Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lord of Flies Analysis
Lord of Flies Analysis
commenting on the action or intruding into the story. The narrator speaks in the third person, primarily focusing on
Ralph’s point of view but following Jack and Simon in certain episodes. The narrator is omniscient and gives us access to
the characters’ inner thoughts.
THEMES
Civilization vs. Savagery
The central concern of Lord of the Flies is the conflict between two competing impulses that exist within all human
beings: the instinct to live by rules, act peacefully, follow moral commands, and value the good of the group against the
instinct to gratify one’s immediate desires, act violently to obtain supremacy over others, and enforce one’s will. This
conflict might be expressed in a number of ways: civilization vs. savagery, order vs. chaos, reason vs. impulse, law vs.
anarchy.
Lord of the Flies is an allegorical novel, which means that Golding conveys many of his main ideas and themes through
symbolic characters and objects. He represents the conflict between civilization and savagery in the conflict between the
novel’s two main characters: Ralph, the protagonist, who represents order and leadership; and Jack, the antagonist, who
represents savagery and the desire for power.
Golding implies that the instinct of savagery is far more primal and fundamental to the human psyche than the instinct
of civilization. Golding sees moral behavior, in many cases, as something that civilization forces upon the individual
rather than a natural expression of human individuality. When left to their own devices, Golding implies, people
naturally revert to cruelty, savagery, and barbarism. Among all the characters, only Simon seems to possess anything like
a natural, innate goodness.
Loss of Innocence
As the boys on the island progress from well-behaved, orderly children longing for rescue to cruel, bloodthirsty hunters
who have no desire to return to civilization, they naturally lose the sense of innocence that they possessed at the
beginning of the novel. But Golding does not portray this loss of innocence as something that is done to the children;
rather, it results naturally from their increasing openness to the innate evil and savagery that has always existed within
them. Golding implies that civilization can mitigate but never wipe out the innate evil that exists within all human
beings.
The struggle to build civilization forms the main conflict of Lord of the Flies. Ralph and Piggy believe that structure, rules,
and maintaining a signal fire are the greatest priorities, while Jack believes hunting, violence, and fun should be
prioritized over safety, protection, and planning for the future. While initially the boys, including Jack, agree to abide by
Ralph’s rules and democratic decision-making, the slow and thoughtful process of building an orderly society proves too
difficult for many of the boys. They don’t want to help build the shelters, maintain the signal fire, or take care of the
littluns. The immediate fun and visceral rewards of hunting, chanting, and dancing around the fire are more attractive
than the work of building a sustainable society.
The fact that the main characters in Lord of the Flies are young boys suggests the potential for evil is inherent even in
small children. Jack, for example, is initially keen for rules and civility, but becomes obsessed with hunting, frightened
and empowered by the promise of violence. Jack’s desire to control and subjugate proves more powerful than his desire
for empathy, intellect, and civilization, and Jack becomes a brutal and leader. Even Ralph and Piggy, who both strive to
maintain their sense of humanity, ultimately join in on the mass murder of Simon, momentarily surrendering to the thrill
of violence and mass hysteria. While Piggy tries to ignore their participation, Ralph is devastated when he realizes that
he is no better than Jack or Roger, and that he has a darkness inside as well.
Dangers of mob mentality
Lord of the Flies explores the dangers of mob mentality in terrifying scenes of violence and torture. Early on, the boys
sing “Kill the pig. Cut her throat. Spill her blood,” after a successful hunt, elevating their shared act of violence into a
celebratory chant. By coming together as a mob, the boys transform the upsetting experience of killing an animal into a
bonding ritual. Acting as one group, the boys are able to commit worse and worse crimes, deluding one another into
believing in the potential danger posed by the beast justifies their violence. Similarly, the boys use war paint to hide
their identities as individuals, and avoid personal responsibility.
Set during a global war, Lord of the Flies offers a view of what society might look like trying to rebuild after a large scale
manmade catastrophe. In their attempt to rebuild society, the boys cannot agree on a new order and eventually fall into
savagery. Ralph comes to realize that social order, fairness and thoughtfulness have little value in a world where basic
survival a struggle, such as after a devastating war. The paratrooper who lands on the island reminds the reader that
while the boys are struggling to survive peacefully on the island, the world at large is still at war. Even in their isolation
and youth, the boys are unable to avoid violence. In their descent into torture and murder, they mirror the warring
world around them
COMPONENTS
- Linguistic component: To know English, “Basic grammar structures”, to know de alphabet
- Cognitive component: To recognize narrative structures, to acknowledge certain figures of speech to interpret
the written text deeply, to have a wild amount of vocabulary to grasp the descriptions, to know the context
where the story is settled.
- Local component: Sow – wild pig, barmy – crazy, bloody – cursed, chastisement – punishment, do us - kill us,
queer – different, wacco – excellent.
- Sociocultural component: Give him a four penny one - hit him on the jaw, taken short – having diarrhea, round
the bend – crazy
SPEAKING
Situation: A bunch of British kids crashed in an island and they are trying to survive
Participants: Ralph, Piggy, Jack, Simon, SamandEric, Roger, the littluns, Maurice, Roger, Johnny, Percival, Henry.
Ends: To narrate the end of innocence, the darkness of man’s heart, the conflict between two competing impulses that
exist within all human beings: the instinct to live by rules, act peacefully, follow moral commands, and value the good of
the group against the instinct to gratify one’s immediate desires, act violently to obtain supremacy over others, and
enforce one’s will.
Act sequence:
Genre: Novel, Allegory. Allegorical fiction employs specific characters, settings, and events to represent something on a
much larger scale or with much deeper meaning.
FIGURES OF SPEECH
Simile
- The breezes that on the lagoon had chased their tails like kittens were finding their way across the platform and
into the forest.
- This toy of voting was almost as pleasing as the conch.
- the sun gazed down like an angry eye
- The rock was as large as a small motor car.
Metaphor
- The Conch Shell - the conch shell becomes a powerful symbol of civilization and order in the novel. The shell
effectively governs the boys’ meetings, for the boy who holds the shell holds the right to speak. In this regard,
the shell is more than a symbol—it is an actual vessel of political legitimacy and democratic power.
- Piggy’s Glasses - his glasses represent the power of science and intellectual endeavor in society.
- The Signal Fire - The signal fire burns on the mountain, and later on the beach, to attract the notice of passing
ships that might be able to rescue the boys. As a result, the signal fire becomes a barometer of the boys’
connection to civilization. The signal fire thus functions as a kind of measurement of the strength of the civilized
instinct remaining on the island.
- The Beast - The imaginary beast that frightens all the boys stands for the primal instinct of savagery that exists
within all human beings. The more savagely the boys act, the more real the beast seems to become.
- The Lord of the Flies - the Lord of the Flies becomes both a physical manifestation of the beast, a symbol of the
power of evil, and a kind of Satan figure who evokes the beast within each human being.
- Ralph, Piggy, Jack, Simon, and Roger - Lord of the Flies is an allegorical novel, and many of its characters signify
important ideas or themes. Ralph represents order, leadership, and civilization. Piggy represents the scientific
and intellectual aspects of civilization. Jack represents unbridled savagery and the desire for power. Simon
represents natural human goodness. Roger represents brutality and bloodlust at their most extreme.
- then returned as a fighter-plane
Alliteration
Irony/Understatement
- The fire that was meant to kill and destroy saved them from the island.
Oxymoron
- deafening silence
- Concealing splendors of the sunlight.
Chiasmus
- Percival was mouse-colored and had not been very attractive even to his mother; Johnny was well built, with fair
hair and a natural belligerence.
SUBCATEGORIES OF DESCRPTION
PROSOPOGRAPHY
ETOPEIA
- I could swim when I was five. (Ralph)
- He’s a commander in the Navy (Ralph’s dad)
-
TOPOGRAPHY
- The shore was fledged with palm trees. These stood or leaned or reclined against the light and their green
feathers were a hundred feet up in the air.
- the island ran true to form and the incredible pool, which clearly was only invaded by the sea at high tide, was
so deep at one end as to be dark green.
VOCABULARIO
CORAL REEF
SPEAR – VENABLO/LANZA
LOGS – TRONCOS
CLIFF – ACANTILADO
THE CONCH
A conch is a type of mollusk with a pink and white shell in the shape of a spiral. Once the animal inside dies, the shell can
be used as a trumpet by blowing into one end. In Lord of the Flies, the boys use a conch to call meetings and also to
designate who is speaking. In this way, the conch symbolizes democracy and free speech – anyone who is holding the
conch can speak his mind, and everyone else must listen and wait their turns for the conch. However, the fact that the
conch is easily broken, signaling the end of civil communication, symbolizes the fragility of democracy, which needs
protection by all participants in order to survive.