Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Community Leadership Medicine
Community Leadership Medicine
Joshua DeKlotz
LDRS 450: Contemporary Issues of Leadership
Dr. Josh Armstrong
September 30, 2020
Leadership Interview Reflection Paper
Dr. Helen Taussig was arguably one of the most accomplished and influential women to
grace the field of medicine. Born in 1898, she is commonly credited as the founder of the field of
pediatric cardiology and notably developed a procedure that extends the lives of babies born with
blue baby syndrome. What made Dr. Taussig especially remarkable was her ability to connect
and communicate with her patients. Dr. Taussig was mostly deaf as an adult, and relied on lip-
reading and non-traditional methods of communication. Astonishingly, Taussig was able to use
her fingers to literally “feel” the heart rhythms of her patients, allowing her to diagnose and
understand her patients in an unprecedented manner. Taussig went on to win numerous awards
and commendations, notably becoming the first woman to be the head of the American Heart
When I interviewed Dr. Paul Francis, a retired pediatric cardiologist, about leadership in
the field of medicine, he stated “it is important to realize that we are standing on the shoulders of
giants,” referring to Dr. Taussig as one of his personal heroines. Caring about legacy and how
one shapes the people that come after oneself was one of the major themes that Dr. Paul
emphasized in our conversation about leadership. Dr. Paul went on to narrate a story about the
first time he met Dr. Taussig, the joy emanating from his smile as he spoke of her. Dr. Paul went
on to talk about how he had received a plant that had belonged to Dr. Taussig, and as an act of
symbolism and rite of passage, he has given a leaf from that plant to each of the pediatric
cardiology students that he has helped teach and inspire. Dr. Paul was moved almost to tears just
recounting the story to me, which was incredibly inspiring as a young and aspiring physician to
2
get a glimpse of the fulfillment and pride that come from a lifetime of teaching, leadership, and
mentorship. From this interview, I hoped to get a taste of some wisdom learned from a lifetime
of medical practice and leadership. I had the pleasure of interviewing Dr. Paul to discuss his
experience with leadership qualities, the practice of leadership, servant leadership, and some
Dr. Paul Francis is an exemplary model of a lifetime of leadership in the medical field.
Dr. Paul was the oldest child, a leader within his own family of sorts. He identified leadership
qualities in himself from a young age. His academic success was spurred in high school when he
won the “Harvard Book Club Award,” which partially led him to declare one day to his family in
the car that he was going to be a doctor someday. He attended UC Davis medical school and
graduated in the 5th cohort to come out of the newly established institution. Picking a specialty
was not a straightforward process. Dr. Paul was staunchly determined to go into orthopedic
surgery, but was discouraged from that particular career path after he witnessed a surgery in
which a drill bit broke while piercing into a bone, and a team member had to run down to the
hardware store to pick up a replacement. In his words, this experience made him say “no way!”
to orthopedics. Dr. Paul discovered his passion for cardiology in a unique way: listening to his
father’s records of heart sounds on their record player. Dr. Paul recounted how fascinating and
beautiful it was to simply sit and listen to the heart. During one of his shifts in the ER, the time
listening to the heart paid off, as he was able to identify a heart irregularity just by matching its
sound to what he recognized from the record player—a diagnosis all of his peers and higher-ups
Dr. Paul became more interested in cardiology, reading a book about EKGs over break.
His newfound knowledge of cardiology made him the “heart guy” among his peers. They called
3
him the “heart guy” for a reason, as he received the leadership award and was distinguished
among his peers as a resident. Dr. Paul went on to do his fellowship at Cincinnati Children’s
hospital. Dr. Paul went on to hold other leadership roles including the chief of Pediatrics at
UCSF, chief of pediatric cardiology and of all pediatric subspecialties, president of the Western
Society of Pediatric Cardiology, and now teaches young pediatric cardiologists at the Oregon
Health and Science University—cementing his personal philosophy that a leader is someone who
is equally committed to both learning and teaching. As another fun fact, he is also fluent in
Dr. Paul and I began our conversation on leadership discussing how he had seen
medical leadership evolve throughout his tenure and what qualities he envisions in an effective
leader. Dr. Paul noted that when he was a younger doctor, he noticed that there were sometimes
flaws in the system that chose its medical leaders. He noted that it was common for people to be
promoted to leadership positions of given authority for “the wrong reasons,” including things
like research success, lucrative practice, academic reputation, or even skill as a clinician. While
Dr. Paul noted that all these traits are good and important, they do not necessarily make one a
good leader in practice. Leadership positions were sometimes seen as rewards--bestowed for
pleasing the people in charge. According to Dr. Paul, this led to some real “hit or miss”
leadership candidates. In his book, The Practice of Adaptive Leadership, Ronald Heifetz notes
that “the formal authority of your position is not enough to effect change” (Heifetz, 2009, p. 52).
In the past, it was simply a product of the system when underqualified leaders were put in
positions of authority. Heifetz notes that it is common for organizations to “get trapped by their
current ways of doing things, simply because these ways worked in the past” (Heifetz, 2009, p.
51). However, it takes leadership to notice ineffective practices and change them. Dr. Paul
4
explained how he has seen a shift in medical leadership over the years, and how he has played an
active role in changing the way that medical leadership is cultivated. Dr. Paul discussed how he
took part in “leadership lunches” in which principles of effective leadership were discussed with
young people in the field. Dr. Paul believes it is a much rarer occurrence now to be chosen
wrongfully as a leader, since different leadership qualities are cultivated and appreciated in
modern medicine.
There is a saying that leading in medicine is like trying to herd cats. Dr. Paul noted that
there is some truth to this saying. When working with medical professionals, you are working
with a group of people who have all, for the most part, achieved great academic and professional
success in their endeavors. Some level of confidence, stubbornness, and ego tend to accompany
that success. Heifetz offers a similar observation, “As tried-and-true patterns of thinking and
acting produced success for the organization, they also produced success for the individuals who
embraced those patterns…Moving away from what has worked in the past is especially difficult
for people in midcareer who have enjoyed considerable professional success” (Heifetz, 2009, pp.
51-52). Alas, medicine is a dynamic field. With new technologies, procedures, laws, finance, and
protocols affecting medicine every year, flexibility and adaptivity are crucial to the success of a
manage the self, and energize others. Dr. Paul believes the key to this is maintaining personal
relationships. To paraphrase, he told me that the most important thing one can do to cultivate
relationships as a leader through every interaction is to make the person you are talking to feel
like they are the most important person in the world to you while you are with them. Leadership
is built from the ground-up by maintaining genuine connection with colleagues and creating an
environment in which they can best thrive. Our leadership literature discusses the importance of
5
“getting on the balcony” to enhance your perspective of the systems and people around you. I
built with the people you are observing. This is especially important in the field of medicine—an
extremely emotional, stressful, and human profession that is hard to understand fully from the
outside.
An effective leader is not necessarily the chief problem solver as much as they are the
chief cultivator and team builder. Dr. Paul noted that in one of his leadership positions at UCSF,
he was assigned the role of chief of pediatrics while doing a minimum amount of pediatrics. This
echoes a sentiment from O’Malley’s and Cebula’s Your Leadership Edge, in which the authors
note that “leadership on adaptive challenges is less about implementing solutions and more about
creating the conditions for those with the problem to solve the problem. Leadership is mobilizing
others to make progress on daunting challenges” (O’Malley & Cebula, 2015, p. 44). Dr. Paul
also emphasized this when discussion his idea of healthcare as a team effort among many
physicians, nurses, and specialists. One thing he said that stuck with me is that he would always
tell his students to start rounds by asking the nurse that was on overnight duty what they had
observed overnight before consulting the charts or data. A leader knows and appreciates the
contributions and worth of all members of a team and creates an environment for the team
members to thrive. Dr. Paul rejects the “I’m the Boss” mentality. Especially in healthcare, there
are no individual winners or losers; any success is shared success among doctor, nurse, and
patient alike. One other personal philosophy that Dr. Paul shared that I resonated with was that
he would never ask “can we….?” He would always ask, “how do we…?” I thought this was
another small indication of Dr. Paul’s commitment to the team mentality and “mobilizing others
Dr. Paul also shared some other general advice and wisdom with me about how to be
successful and happy in the field. Firstly, we talked about the importance of keeping medicine
personal. It is becoming more normal to solve medical problems with technology, machines, or
medicines, but there is a significant part of medicine that cannot be done by mere technology.
The most vital part of medicine is the human aspect—the patient contact—that keeps medicine
personal and intimate. Dr. Paul expressed how he would do little things to establish physical
connection like putting a hand on a shoulder while listening to heart sounds. Small things like
this allow a patient to know that they are cared for by another human being who values their
physical presence. Another thing we discussed was the necessity for a deep desire to serve.
Medicine is a terrible field to go into if you seek power or glory. It is too hard, demanding, and
draining of a job to do without a deeply held passion for your work. At the heart of this passion
is the will to serve others which connects to the idea of servant leadership. Lastly, we discussed
the importance of keeping the wonder in what you do. The human body, mind, and spirit are
wonder-filled things, and maintaining a sense of awe and curiosity help to sustain one’s passion.
As Dr. Paul said, “listen to the heart,” which resonates in both the literal and metaphorical. After
reflecting on this experience, I am coming away with a reminder to keep my sense of awe, a
fresh perspective on what leadership means in the field of medicine, and a reminder to stay
References
Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The Practice of Adaptive Leadership: Tools
and Tactics for Changing Your Organization and the World. Harvard Business Press.
O'Malley, E., & Cebula, A. (2015). Your Leadership Edge: Lead any Time, Anywhere. KLC
Press, Kansas Leadership Center.