Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment 1 - Critical Reflection and Discussion - NSB204 2020. - 1 - Docx
Assessment 1 - Critical Reflection and Discussion - NSB204 2020. - 1 - Docx
ASSESSMENT TASK 1
Assessment Task 1
Length: 1100 words +/- 10% (word length includes in-text referencing and
excludes your reference list).
Weighting: 30 %
How will I be assessed: 7 point grading scale using the attached CRA
Due date: 2/08/20 submitted as a word document via Turnitin in your NSB204
Blackboard site by 11.59pm.
Assessment submitted after the due date without an approved extension
will not be marked and will receive a grade of 1. More information about
QUT’s Late Assessment Policy is available
Presentation Your assignment should be written in CiteWrite APA style and prepared
requirements: as follows:
• Cover sheet with the assessment title, your name, student
number, tutor name (not necessarily the Unit Coordinator) and
word count.
• Include a ‘footer’ on each page with your name, student number,
unit code and page number.
• 3 cm margins on all sides, double-spaced text
• Use font, such as Times New Roman, Arial or Calibri; font size 12
• CiteWrite APA style referencing. It is a requirement that you
include page numbers for all in-text references
• (see http://www.citewrite.qut.edu.au/)
o Headings can be used to structure your assignment
logically
o You do not need an introduction or a conclusion
o Please use “I”… if you are being asked to reflect
o Do not use dot points
o Use a minimum of ten (10) valid, contemporary peer
reviewed articles with the addition of textbooks as
appropriate -
o References should be no older than 7 years
Resources needed to • Week 0 and Week 1 readings, lectures and tutorials on the
complete task: Blackboard site for NSB204.
• The videos “Surviving Schizophrenia” (2016) and “Imagine there
was no stigma to mental illness” (2016).
• Cite|Write APA guide.
• Turnitin Tip Sheets.
Academic Integrity
The School of Nursing takes academic integrity very seriously. All work
submitted must be your own work and work not previously submitted
for other study. The work of others needs to be correctly
acknowledged and referenced according to the CiteWrite APA
guidelines.
Demonstrates an Full and detailed Well developed Sound description of the Described in general Struggled to Did not meet the
understanding of the description of the description of the challenges and factors terms the challenges describe the requirement of
factors that can challenges and factors challenges and that can compromise and factors that can challenges and the task
promote or that can compromise factors that can mental health for compromise mental factors that can
compromise mental mental health for compromise mental ourselves and others, in health for ourselves and compromise mental
health in others ourselves and others, in health for ourselves order to promote positive others, in order to health for ourselves
order to promote positive and others, in order mental health and well- promote positive mental and others, in order
Weighting: 25%
mental health and well- to promote positive being. health and well-being. to promote positive
being. mental health and mental health and
well-being. well-being.
Describes how new
Gave a full and detailed Gave a well- Gave a sound Gave a description in Struggled to Did not meet the
learnings will be
description of how developed description of how general terms of how describe how requirements of
applied to clinical
knowledge of mental description of how knowledge of mental knowledge of mental knowledge of the task
practice.
health and illness can be knowledge of health and illness can be health and illness can be mental health and
Weighting: 25% applied to person- mental health and applied to person- applied to person- illness can be
centred/recovery-oriented illness can be centred/recovery- centred/ recovery- applied to person-
care applied to person- oriented care oriented care
Communicates in
Maintained appropriate Maintained Maintained appropriate Maintained appropriate Suspected failure to Suspected failure
academic writing
standards of academic appropriate standards of academic standards ofacademic maintain to maintain
incorporating
integrity.Met the standards of integrity.Met several integrity.Met a few appropriate appropriate
expected information
presentation academic aspects of the aspects of the standards of standards of
literacy standards
requirements.Consistently integrity.Met, for the presentation presentation academic academic
used professional non- most part, the requirements.Mostly requirements.Sometimes integrity.Met few integrity.Ignored
20%
discriminatory presentation used professional non- used professional non- aspects ofthe presentation
language.Expressed your requirements.Almost discriminatory discriminatory presentation requirements.Did
ideas clearly, concisely always used language.Usually language.Expressed requirements.Rarely not use
and fluently with correct professional non- expressed your ideas your ideas used professional professional non-
spelling and discriminatory clearly with correct clearly.Occasionally non-discriminatory discriminatory
grammar.Consistently language.Expressed spelling and cited sources and language.Ideas language.Ideas
and accurately cited your ideas concisely grammar.Mostly cited sometimes correctly were not expressed were not
sources & appliedQUT and fluently with sources correctly and applied QUT APA style clearly.Rarely cited expressed
APA style of correct spelling and applied QUT APA style of referencing.Kept to sources or correctly clearly.Rarely
referencing.Kept to word grammar.Almost of referencing.Kept to word limit. applied QUT APA cited sources or
limit. always cited word limit style of correctly applied
sources correctly & referencing.Was QUT APA style
applied QUT APA under or over the of
style of word limit. referencing.Was
referencing.Kept to significantly
word limit. under or over the
required word
limit.
Satisfactorily
complied with the
Academic Integrity
standards outlined in
the MOPP C/5.3
Academic Integrity
.