Evitha Virgina Bera - Tabel Jurnal

Komunikasi Keamanan |
5A1
DISIAPKAN OLEH Evitha Virgina Bera (201710415152)
Malcolm N. MacDonald & Duncan Hunter, (2019). The Discourse

of Security Language, Illiberalism and Governmentality .
Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 1-22.
1. Latar Belakang Di masa abad ke 20 ini, setelah Kejadian 9/11 sudah berlalu mengenai sayap kiri, dan
beberapa kejadian terorisme. Mengenai pemerintah di beberapa Negara memilih menjadi
sayap kiri. Si penulis ingin tahu diskursus mengenai pasca 9/11
2. Pertanyaan Riset/ -
Problematisasi
3. Tujuan/Objektif Hal-hal apa saja yang hendak dilakukan atau dibahas untuk menjawab dan memecahkan
permasalahan..
• to explore the extent to which the principles of governmentality are

realised in the security discourse produced by national governments,
national media, security agencies and supranational fora;
• to explore the extent to which a ‘state of emergency’ is realised in the
security discourse produced by national governments, national media,
security agencies and supranational fora; and
• to explore the ways in which the security discourse produced by
national governments, national media, security agencies and supranational
fora is constituted as a ‘discursive formation’.
4. Rangkuman State of the Art

-
(SoA)
5. Urgensi/Kebaruan -
6. Kerangka Teoretis/ 9/11, linguistic, discourse

Konseptual
9/11, linguistic, diskursus
7. Metode Kualitatif
5A1
8. Argumen Utama To address the aim of the book set out above, our theorisation of post-9/11 discourse
combines conventional theories of language and discourse with more recent critical
theories in poststructuralist and political philosophy.
9. Argumen Penunjang While discourse analysis is usually the provenance of linguistics and applied linguistics, the
study of security is usually the provenance of political science, international relations and
security studies.
10. Kutipan -
11. Komentar Karna ini masih terdapat di pendahaluan (introduction) menurut saya yang ada ialah
pengenalan bab yang akan di baca masih belum ada kutipan juga
12. Daftar Pustaka
Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford,
CA: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, G. (2005). The State of Exception. Chicago, IL: University of
Chicago Press.
Appleby, N. (2010). Labelling the Innocent: How Government Counter-
Terrorism Advice Creates Labels That Contribute to the Problem. Critical
Studies on Terrorism, 3(3), 421–436.
Baker, P. (2010). Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh
University Press.
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T., &
Wodak, R. (2008). A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical
Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees
and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306.
Bernstein, B. (1990). The Social Construction of Pedagogic Discourse. In
Class, Codes and Control (Vol. IV, pp. 165–219). London: Routledge and
Kegan Paul.
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research,
Critique. London: Taylor and Francis.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research,
Critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bhatia, A. (2009). The Discourses of Terrorism. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2),
279–289.
Bigo, D. (2008). Globalized (In)Security: The Field and the Ban-Opticon.
In D. Bigo & A. Tsoukala (Eds.), Terror, Insecurity and Liberty. Illiberal
Practices of Liberal Regimes After 9/11 (pp. 10–48). Abingdon: Routledge.
Cap, P. (2010). Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary
Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric (2nd Rev ed.). Newcastle:
Cambridge Scholars Press.
Chilton, P. A. (1996). Security Metaphors. Cold War Discourse from
Containment to Common House. New York: Lang.
20 M. N. MacDonald and D. Hunter
De Beaugrande, R. (2004). Critical Discourse Analysis from the Perspective of
Ecologism. Critical Discourse Studies, 1(1), 113–145.
Dunmire, P. L. (2011). Projecting the Future Through Political Discourse: The
5A1
Case of the Bush Doctrine. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fairclough, N. (2000). New Labour, New Language? Abingdon: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1967). Madness and Civilization. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1970). The Order of Things. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1973). The Birth of the Clinic. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Foucault, M. (1984). The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Harmondsworth:
Penguin Books.
Foucault, M. (2004). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France
1975–1976. London: Penguin Books.
Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de
France 1977–1978. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France,
1978–1979. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gabrielatos, C., & Duguid, A. (2015, April). Corpus Linguistics and CDA
Revisiting the Notion of Synergy. Unpublished Paper Presented at the
Conference of Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Gillborn, D. (2006). Rethinking White Supremacy: Who Counts in
Whiteworld. Ethnicities, 6(3), 318–340.
Graham, P., Keenan, T., & Dowd, A.-M. (2004). A Call to Arms at the End of
History: A Discourse-Historical Analysis of George W. Bush’s Declaration
of War on Terror. Discourse & Society, 15(2–3), 199–222.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1976). Language as a Social Semiotic. London: Edward
Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1st ed.).
London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An Introduction to
Functional Grammar (3rd Rev ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Hodges, A. (2011). The ‘War on Terror’ Narrative: Discourse and Intertextuality
in the Construction and Contestation of Socio-Political Reality. New York and
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1 Introduction 21
Kean, T. H., & Hamilton, L. (2004). The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report
of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.
Washington: National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United
States.
Koteyko, N. (2014). Language and Politics in Post-Soviet Russia: A Corpus
Assisted Approach. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Leech, G., & Fallon, R. (1992). Computer Corpora—What Do They Tell Us
About Culture? ICAME Journal, 16, 29–50.
Preston, J. (2009). Preparing for Emergencies: Citizenship Education,
Whiteness and Pedagogies of Security. Citizenship Studies, 13(2), 187–200.
Sahlane, A. (2013). Metaphor as Rhetoric: Newspaper Op/Ed Debate of the
Prelude to the 2003 Iraq War. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(2), 154–171.
Sikka, T. (2006). The New Imperialism: Using Critical Discourse Analysis and
Articulation Theory to Study George W. Bush’s Freedom Doctrine. Global
Change, 18(2), 101–114.
Silberstein, S. (2002). War of Words: Language, Politics and 9/11. London and
New York: Routledge.
Simone, M. A. (2009). Give Me Liberty and Give Me Surveillance: A Case
Study of the US Governments Discourse of Surveillance. Critical Discourse
Studies, 6(1), 1–14.
Subtirelu, N. C., & Baker, P. (2017). Corpus-Based Approaches. In
J. Richardson & J. Flowerdew (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical
Discourse Studies (pp. 107–120). Abingdon: Routledge.
Vessey, R. (2015). Corpus Approaches to Language Ideology. Applied
5A1
Linguistics, 38(3), 277–296.
Wodak, R. (2001). The Discourse-Historical Approach. In R. Wodak & M.
Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 63–95). London:
Sage.
5A1
Taylor C. Bryan , (2017). ‘The movie has to go forward’:

surveying media – security relationship. University of
Rochester, 25.
1. Latar Belakang Pembahasan mengenai perkembangan media yang membuat komunikasi keamanana
semakin berkembang juga, salah satu media yang di bahas ialah film. Penulis ingin
melakukan mengenai media dan senjata nuklir yang meragukan status komunikatif
teknologi keamanan.
2. Pertanyaan Riset/ Apakah teknologi komunikasi senjata nuklir? Jika demikian, bagaimana kita tahu?
Problematisasi Dan mengapa kita harus peduli?
3. Tujuan/Objektif Saya mengusulkan di sini perbedaan heuristik antara dua ontologi hubungan media-senjata
nuklir. Ontologi pertama menekankan independensi relatif dari fenomena ini. Yang kedua
menekankan ketergantungan relatif mereka. Seperti yang akan kita lihat, ontologi ini
menghasilkan laporan berbeda dari penelitian terkait, dan dengan demikian jawaban yang
berbeda untuk pertanyaan ini.
4. Rangkuman State of the Art Diskusi saya di sini tentang pekerjaan itu berasal dari proyek survei literatur ilmiah yang
(SoA) sedang berlangsung menggambarkan hubungan keamanan dan komunikasi. Selama 2014,
saya mengumpulkan bahan-bahan untuk proyek ini dengan melakukan pencarian kata
kunci dari basis data seperti Google Cendekia dan Komunikasi dan Media Massa Lengkap.
Esai yang akan datang akan fokus pada perawatan keamanan di subbidang seperti
retorika, argumentasi, studi wacana, dan komunikasi internasional dan antarbudaya. Esai
ini, bagaimanapun, mengisolasi dan mengklarifikasi hubungan media-keamanan. Ini
dimulai dengan ikhtisar singkat tentang sejarah komunikasi seputar hubungan ini, dan
tren terkini yang merangsang konvergensi interdisipliner media dan beasiswa keamanan.
6. Kerangka Teoretis/ Media; keamanan; senjata nuklir

Konseptual
5A1
7. Metode Teori konstruktivisme (Kualitatif)
8. Argumen Utama Apakah teknologi komunikasi senjata nuklir? Jika demikian, bagaimana kita tahu? Dan
mengapa kita harus peduli? Sebagai tanggapan, dan juga untuk memperbarui
konseptualisasi sebelumnya (Taylor, 1998, 2003)
9. Argumen Penunjang Kekhawatiran utama, selanjutnya, melibatkan kondisi dan kegiatan yang terkait dengan
pemilihan, pengaturan, sirkulasi, dan konsumsi mediasi nuklir - khususnya infleksi mereka
oleh narasi ideologis. Sebagai contoh, Kim dan Jahng (2016) baru-baru ini
mendokumentasikan bias yang ditampilkan dalam liputan berita nasional tentang
proliferasi nuklir terhadap penggunaan terbatas sumber-sumber elit dan etnosentris.
10. Kutipan Yang artinya, jauh dari menjadi objek yang stabil dan mandiri, media hanya dapat
menggambarkan senjata nuklir sebagai fragmen kasar, ambigu, dan metonimik
(mis. Dalam gambar teknologi peluncuran ‘tombol tekan’; Plot- nick, 2012).
11. Komentar Mengenai urgensi saya masih belum memahaminya bu. Terima kasih. Namun jika menurut
KBBI urgensi ialah suat hal yang mendesak. Saya rasa hubungan media-senjata nuklir sesuai
yang di bahas oleh plot nick. Saya sebagai pembaca merasa senjata nuklir sangat ambigu.
12. Daftar Pustaka
Altheide, D. L. (1984). Media hegemony: A failure of perspective. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48(2), 476–
490.
Andrejevic, M. (2011). ‘Securitainment’ in the post-9/11 era. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural
Studies, 25, 165–175. Aradau, C. (2010). Security that matters: Critical infrastructure and objects of
protection. Security Dialogue, 41(5), 491–514.
Ashley, S. (2014). Making the case for war: A comparative analysis of CNN and BBC coverage of colin
powell’s presentation to the United Nations security council. Media, War & Conflict, 8(1), 120–140.
Atkinson, N. S. (2011). Newsreels as domestic propaganda: Visual rhetoric at the dawn of the cold war.
Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 14(1), 69–100.
Awan, A. N., Hoskins, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2011). Radicalization and the media: Connectivity and
terrorism in the new media ecology. New York, NY: Routledge.
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Baudrillard, J.
(1995). The Gulf war did not take place. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Benjamin, W. (1968). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.),
Illuminations (pp. 217–252).
New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich.
Bhattacharyya, G. (2011). Sex, shopping and security: Thinking about feminist media studies again.
Feminist Media Studies,
11(1), 13–20.
Boggs, C., & Pollard, T. (2016). The Hollywood war machine: US militarism and popular culture. New
York, NY: Routledge. Bossio, D. (2011). A war about meaning: A case study of media contestation of the
Australian Anti-terror laws. Continuum:
Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 25(2), 261–271.
Boyd-Barrett, O. (2006). Cyberspace, globalization and empire. Global Media and Communication, 2(1),
21–41.
5A1
Boyd-Barrett, O., Herrera, D., & Baumann, J. A. (2011). Hollywood and the CIA: Cinema, defense and
subversion. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Bradimore, A., & Bauder, H. (2011). Mystery ships and risky boat people: Tamil refugee migration in the
newsprint media.
Canadian Journal of Communication, 36(4), 637–661.
Brinson, M. E., & Stohl, M. (2012). Media framing of terrorism: Implications for public opinion, civil
liberties, and counter- terrorism policies. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 5(4),
270–290.
Buus, S. (2009). Hell on earth, threats, citizens and the state: From buffy to beck. Cooperation and
Conflict, 44, 400–419. Calabrese, A. (2005). Casus belli: US media and the justification of the Iraq war.
Television & New Media, 6(2), 153–175. Campbell, D., & Shapiro, M. J. (2007). Guest editors’
introduction. Security Dialogue, 38, 131–137.
Carragee, K. M. (1993). A critical evaluation of debates examining the media hegemony thesis. Western
Journal of Communication (Includes Communication Reports), 57(3), 330–348.
Chadwick, A., & Collister, S. (2014). Boundary-drawing power and the renewal of professional news
organizations: The case of The Guardian and the Edward Snowden NSA leak. International Journal of
Communication, 8, 2420–2441.
Cottle, S. (2006). Mediatized conflict: Understanding media and conflicts in the contemporary world. New
York, NY: McGraw- Hill International.
Croft, S. (2012). Securitizing Islam: Identity and the search for security. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. Deibert, R. J. (1999). Harold Innis and the empire of speed. Review of International Studies, 25(2),
273–289.
Der Derian, J. (2009). Virtuous war: Mapping the military-industrial-media-entertainment-network. New
York, NY: Routledge. Derrida, J. (1984). No apocalypse, not now (full speed ahead, seven missiles, seven
missives). Diacritics, 14(2), 20–31. Dillon, M. (2002). Politics of security: Towards a political philosophy
of continental thought. New York, NY: Routledge.
Dittmer, J. (2005). Captain America’s empire: Reflections on identity, popular culture, and post-9/11
geopolitics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(3), 626–643.
Dodds, K. (2010). Jason Bourne: Gender, geopolitics, and contemporary representations of national
security. Journal of Popular Film & Television, 38(1), 21–33.
Draper, R. (2016, March 21). The Go-between. The New Yorker. Retrieved from
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/ 2016/03/21/kate-del-castillo-sean-penn-and-el-chapo
Edwards, P. N. (1997). The closed world: Computers and the politics of discourse in cold war America.
Cambridge: MIT Press. Edy, J. A., & Meirick, P. C. (2007). Wanted, dead or alive: Media frames, frame
adoption, and support for the war in
Afghanistan. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 119–141.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication,
43(4), 51–58. Entman, R. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the white house’s frame after 9/11.
Political Communication, 20(4),
415–432.
Erickson, C. W. (2007). Counter-terror culture: Ambiguity, subversion, or legitimization? Security
Dialogue, 38(2), 197–214. Feldman, A. (2005). On the actuarial gaze: From 9/11 to Abu Ghraib. Cultural
Studies, 19, 203–226.
Galison, P. (1994). The ontology of the enemy: Norbert Wiener and the cybernetic vision. Critical Inquiry,
21(1), 228–266. Gates, K., & Magnet, S. (2007). Communication research and the study of surveillance.
The Communication Review, 10(4),
277–293.
Gilboa, E. (2005). The CNN effect: The search for a communication theory of international relations.
Political Communication, 22, 27–44.
Gilboa, E. (2008). Media diplomacy. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of
communication. Blackwell Reference Online. Retrieved from
http://www.blackwellreference.com.colorado.idm.oclc.org/subscriber/tocnode.html?
id=g9781405131995_chunk_g978140513199518_ss26-1.
Gillespie, M. (2007). Security, media and multicultural citizenship: A collaborative ethnography. European
Journal of Cultural Studies, 10, 275–293.
Glander, T. (1999). Origins of mass communications research during the American cold war: Educational
effects and contemporary implications. New York, NY: Routledge.
5A1
Gow, J., & Michalski, M. (2008). War, image and legitimacy: Viewing contemporary conflict. New York,
NY: Routledge. Grossman, L. (2016, March 17). Inside Apple CEO Tim Cook’s fight with the FBI. Time
Magazine. Retrieved from http://time.
com/4262480/tim-cook-apple-fbi-2/
Gusterson, H. (2001). The virtual nuclear weapons laboratory in the new world order. American
Ethnologist, 28(2), 417– 437.
Hall, R. (2007). Of Ziploc bags and black holes: The aesthetics of transparency in the war on terror. The
Communication Review, 10(4), 319–346.
Hamilton, K., & O’Gorman, N. (2015). Visualities of strategic vision: Lookout mountain laboratory and
the deterrent state from nuclear tests to Vietnam. Visual Studies, 30(2), 195–208.
Hammond, P. (2007). Media, war and postmodernity. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hansen, L. (2008). Images, identity and security. Bringing together international politics and media
research. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 53–56.
Hansen, L. (2011). Theorizing the image for security studies: Visual securitization and the Muhammad
cartoon crisis.
European Journal of International Relations, 17, 51–74.
Hariman, R., & Lucaites, J. L. (2007). No caption needed: Iconic photographs, public culture, and liberal
democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hasian Jr, M. A. (2014). Military orientalism at the cineplex: A postcolonial reading of zero dark thirty.
Critical Studies in Media Communication, 31(5), 464–478.
Hayden, C. (2012). The rhetoric of soft power: Public diplomacy in global contexts. Lanham, MD:
Lexington Books. Hecht, G. (2007). A cosmogram for nuclear things. Isis, 98(1), 100–108.
Hill, I. E. (2012). Not quite bleeding from the ears: Amplifying sonic torture. Western Journal of
Communication, 76(3), 217– 235.
Hoskins, A. (2006). Temporality, proximity and security: Terror in a media-drenched age. International
Relations, 20, 453– 466.
Hoskins, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2010). War and media: The emergence of diffused war. Cambridge:
Polity.
Hughes, P. (2010). Governmentality, blurred boundaries, and pleasure in the docusoap border security.
Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 24(3), 439–449.
Jansson, A. (2012). Perceptions of surveillance: Reflexivity and trust in a mediatized world (the case of
Sweden). European Journal of Communication, 27(4), 410–427.
Johnson, D. (2011). Neoliberal politics, convergence, and the do-it-yourself security of 24. Cinema
Journal, 51, 149–154. Jönsson, C. (1996). Diplomatic signaling in the television age. The Harvard
International Journal of Press/Politics, 1, 24–40. Kamalipour, Y. R., & Snow, N. (Eds.). (2004). War,
media, and propaganda: A global perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman &
Littlefield.
Keeble, R. (2000). Hiding the horror of ‘humanitarian’ warfare. Javnost-The Public, 7(3), 87–97.
Kellner, D. (1999). Virilio, war and technology some critical reflections. Theory, Culture & Society,
16(5–6), 103–125. Kim, Y., & Jahng, M. R. (2016). Who frames nuclear testing? Understanding frames
and news sources in the US and South
Korean news coverage of North Korean nuclear testing. The Journal of International Communication,
22(1), 126–142.
Kittler, F. (1998). On the history of the theory of information warfare. Ars Electronica. Retrieved from
http://90.146.8.18/en/ archives/festival_archive/festival_catalogs/festival_artikel.asp?iProjectID=8439
Lantis, J. S. (2009). Strategic culture and tailored deterrence: Bridging the gap between theory and
practice. Contemporary Security Policy, 30, 467–485.
Lasswell, H. D. (1941). The garrison state. American Journal of Sociology, 46, 455–468.
Lawson, S. (2014). The US military’s social media civil war: Technology as antagonism in discourses of
information-age conflict. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27(2), 226–245.
Lievrouw, L. A. (2014). Materiality and media in communication and technology studies. An unfinished
project. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, & K. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication,
materiality, and society (pp. 21–52). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Livingstone, S. (2009). On the mediation of everything. Journal of Communication, 59, 1–18.
Lukens-Bull, R., & Woodward, M. (2009). Israeli nukes versus Palestinian slingshots: David and Goliath
in Indonesia (Report #0901). Tempe: Arizona State University Consortium for Strategic Communication.
Retrieved from http://comops.org/ article/122.pdf
5A1
MacDonald, M. (2006). Empire and communication: The media wars of Marshall McLuhan. Media,
Culture & Society, 28(4), 505–520.
MacKenzie, D., & Spinardi, G. (1995). Tacit knowledge, weapons design, and the uninvention of nuclear
weapons.
American Journal of Sociology, 101, 44–99.
Maltby, S., & Keeble, R. (Eds.). (2007). Communicating war. Bury St. Edmunds: Abramis.
Manoff, R. K. (1989). Modes of war and modes of social address: The text of SDI. Journal of
Communication, 39(1), 59–84. Martin, A., & Petro, P. (Eds.) (2006). Rethinking global security. New
Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Masco, J. (2004). Nuclear technoaesthetics: Sensory politics from trinity to the virtual bomb in Los
Alamos. American Ethnologist, 31(3), 349–373.
Matellart, A. (1994). Mapping world communication: War, progress, culture. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press. Mazzoleni, G. (2008). Mediatization of politics. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international
encyclopedia of communication.
Blackwell Reference Online. Retrieved from
http://http://www.blackwellreference.com.colorado.idm.oclc.org/
subscriber/tocnode.html?id=g9781405131995_chunk_g978140513199518_ss62-1.
McClean, G. (2011). Cultural threats, cop drama, and ‘community PR’: Diversity and security cultures in
EastWest101.
Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 25(2): 177–188.
McGarrity, N. (2011). Fourth estate or government lapdog? The role of the Australian media in the
counter-terrorism context. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 25(2), 273–283.
McLeod, D. M., & Shah, D. V. (2014). News frames and national security. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
McNamara, L. A. (2007). TRUTH is generated HERE: Knowledge loss and the production of confidence
in the post-nuclear era. In B. Taylor, W. Kinsella, S. Depoe, & M. Metzler (Eds.), Nuclear legacies:
Communication, controversy, and the U.S. Nuclear weapons complex (pp. 167–198). Lanham, MD:
Lexington Books.
McQuail, D. (2006). On the mediatization of war. International Communication Gazette, 68, 107–118.
Meinrath, S. D., & Vitka, S. (2014). Crypto war II. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 31(2), 123–
128.
Mellencamp, P. (2006). Fearful thoughts: US television since 9/11 and the wars in Iraq. In A. Martin & P.
Petro (Eds.), Rethinking global security: Media, popular culture, and the ‘war on terror’ (pp. 117–131).
New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Melley, T. (2012). The covert sphere: Secrecy, fiction, and the national security state. Ithaca, NY: Cornell
University Press. Mirghani, S. (2011). The war on piracy: Analyzing the discursive battles of corporate and
government-sponsored anti-
piracy media campaigns. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 28(2), 113–134.
Mirrlees, T. (2016). US empire and communications today: Revisiting Herbert I. Schiller. The Political
Economy of Communication, 3(2), 3–27.
Morgan, M. (2008). Cultivation theory. The international encyclopedia of communication. Blackwell
Reference Online. Retrieved from
http://www.blackwellreference.com.colorado.idm.oclc.org/subscriber/tocnode.html?id=g978140513199
5_chunk_g97814051319958_ss165-1
Moriarty, S., & Shaw, D. (1995). An antiseptic war: Were news magazine images of the Gulf War too
soft? Visual Communication Quarterly, 2(2), 4–11.
Morley, D., & Silverstone, R. (1990). Domestic communication – technologies and meanings. Media,
Culture & Society, 12
(1), 31–55.
Mosco, V., & Foster, D. (2001). Cyberspace and the end of politics. Journal of Communication Inquiry,
25(3), 218–236.
Mullen, A., & Klaehn, J. (2010). The Herman–Chomsky Propaganda model: A critical approach to
analysing mass media behaviour. Sociology Compass, 4(4), 215–229.
Nakamura, L. (2009). Interfaces of identity: Oriental traitors and telematic profiling in 24. Camera
Obscura, 24(1), 109–133. Nikolaidis, A. (2011). Televising counter terrorism: Torture, denial, and
exception in the case of 24. Continuum: Journal of
Media & Cultural Studies, 25, 213–225.
5A1
O’Brian, J. 2015. Camera atomica. London: Black Dog.
O’Gorman, N., & Hamilton, K. (2011). At the interface: The loaded Rhetorical gestures of nuclear
legitimacy and illegiti- macy. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 8(1), 41–66.
Ono, K. (2009). Critical/cultural approaches to communication. In W. E. Eadie (Ed.), 21st century
communication: A reference handbook (pp. 74–81). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Packer, J. (Ed.). (2009). Secret agents: Popular icons beyond James Bond. New York, NY:
Peter Q. Lang. Packer, J. (2013). Screens in the sky: SAGE, surveillance, and the automation of
perceptual, mnemonic, and epistemologi-
cal labor. Social Semiotics, 23(2), 173–195.
Packer, J., & Wiley, S. B. C. (2013). Communication matters: Materialist approaches to media, mobility
and networks.
New York, NY: Routledge.
Pan, Z. (2008). Framing of the news. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of
communication. Retrieved from
http://www.blackwellreference.com.colorado.idm.oclc.org/subscriber/tocnode.html?id=g9781405131995_
chunk_g978 140513199511_ss42-1.
Parks, L. (2006). Planet patrol: Satellite images, acts of knowledge, and global security. In A. Martin & P.
Petro (Eds.), Rethinking global security: Media, popular culture, and the ‘war on terror’ (pp. 132–150).
New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Parks, L. (2013). Zeroing in: Overheard imagery, infrastructure Ruins, and Datalands in Afghanistan and
Iraq. In J. Packer &
S. B. C. Wiley (Eds.), Communication matters: Materialist approaches to media, mobility and networks
(pp. 78–92). New York, NY: Routledge.
Payne, M. T. (2014). War bytes: The critique of militainment in spec ops: The line. Critical Studies in
Media Communication,
31(4), 265–282.
Peoples, C. (2008). Decoding ballistic missile defense: Semiotics and the power of the image in American
Ballistic Missile Defense. Social Semiotics, 18(1), 17–31.
Peters, J. (2011, May 26). ‘Bombs and/as Media.’ Keynote address for ‘Mediating War and Technology’
Pre-conference (Communication history interest group), Annual conference of the International
Communication Association, Boston. Pinkerton, A., Young, S., & Dodds, K. (2011). Postcards from
heaven: Critical geographies of the cold war military–indus-
trial–academic complex. Antipode, 43(3), 820–844.
Plotnick, R. (2012). Predicting push-button warfare: US print media and conflict from a distance, 1945–
2010. Media, Culture & Society, 34(6), 655–672.
Pooley, J. (2008). The new history of mass communication research. In D. Park & J. Pooley (Eds.), The
history of media and communication research: Contested memories (pp. 43–69). New York, NY: Peter
Lang.
Price, E., & Nethery, A. (2012). Truth-telling at the border: An audience appraisal of border security.
Media International Australia, 142(1), 148–156.
Pringle, T. (2014). Photographed by the earth: War and media in light of nuclear events. NECSUS.
European Journal of Media Studies, 3(2), 131–154.
Rasmussen, M. V. (2006). The risk society at war. Terror, technology and strategy in the twenty-first
century. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Reese, S. D., & Lewis, S. C. (2009). Framing the war on terror the internalization of policy in the US
press. Journalism, 10(6), 777–797.
Reeves, J., & Packer, J. (2013). Police media: The governance of territory, speed, and communication.
Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 10(4), 359–384.
Rix, M. (2011). Counter-terrorism and information: The NSI Act, fair trials, and open, accountable
government. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 25(2), 285–297.
Roach, C. (Ed.). (1993). Communication and culture in war and peace. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Robinson, P., Seib, P., & Frohlich, R. (Eds.). (2016). Routlege handbook of media, conflict and security.
Rogers, R., & Ben-David, A. (2010). Coming to terms: A conflict analysis of the usage, in official and
unofficial sources, of ‘security fence’, ’apartheid wall’, and other terms for the structure between Israel and
the Palestinian territories. Media, War & Conflict, 3(2), 202–229.
5A1
Rutherford, P. (2004). Weapons of mass persuasion: Marketing the war against Iraq. Toronto: University
of Toronto Press.
Sanger, D. (2012, June 1). Obama order sped up wave of cyberattacks against Iran. New York Tiimes.
Retrieved from http:// www.nytimes.com/2012/06/01/world/middleeast/obama-ordered-wave-of-
cyberattacks-against-iran.html?_r=0
Schiappa, E. (1989). The rhetoric of nukespeak. Communications Monographs, 56(3), 253–272.
Schiller, D. (2008). The militarization of U.S. communications. Communication, Culture & Critique, 1,
126–138.
Schulte, S. R. (2008). ‘The wargames scenario’: Regulating teenagers and teenaged technology (1980–
1984). Television & New Media, 9, 487–513.
Schwoch, J. (2009). Global TV: new media and the cold war, 1946–69. Urbana-Champaign: University of
Illinois Press. Seib, P., & Janbek, D. M. (2011). Global terrorism and new media: The post-Al Qaeda
generation. New York, NY: Routledge. Shapiro, M. J. (1990). Strategic discourse/discursive strategy: The
representation of ‘security policy’ in the video age.
International Studies Quarterly, 34, 327–340.
Shapiro, M. J. (2009). Cinematic geopolitics. New York, NY: Routledge.
Sheller, M. (2013). Materializing US – Caribbean borders. In J. Packer & S. B. C. Wiley (Eds.),
Communication matters: Materialist approaches to media, mobility and networks (pp. 233–244). New
York, NY: Routledge.
Siegel, G. (2011). Radiating emergency: The perils and promise of the broadcast signal in the atomic age.
Silverstone, R. (1993). Television, ontological security and the transitional object. Media, Culture &
Society, 15, 573–598. Simpson, C. (1994). Science of coercion: Communication research and
psychological warfare 1945–1960. New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
Smith, C. M., & McDonald, K. M. (2011). The mundane to the memorial: Circulating and deliberating the
war in Iraq through vernacular soldier-produced videos. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 28,
292–313.
Sonwalkar, P. (2008). Terrorism and communication technologies. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The
international encyclopedia of communication. Blackwell Reference Online. Retrieved from
http://www.blackwellreference.com.colorado.idm.oclc.
org/subscriber/tocnode.html?id=g9781405131995_chunk_g978140513199525_ss45-1
Stahl, R. (2009). Militainment, Inc.: War, media, and popular culture. New York, NY:
Routledge. Stockwell, S. (2011). Messages from the apocalypse: Security issues in American TV series.
Continuum: Journal of Media &
Cultural Studies, 25, 189–199.
Suchman, L. (2015). Situational awareness: Deadly bioconvergence at the boundaries of bodies and
machines.
MediaTropes, 5(1), 1–24.
Sylvest, C. (2015). Shots of ambivalence: Nuclear weapons in documentary film. In R. Van Munster & C.
Sylvest (Eds.),
Documenting world politics: A critical companion to IR and non-fiction film (pp. 95–113). New York,
NY: Routledge.
Takacs, S. (2005). Jessica Lynch and the regeneration of American identity and power post-9/11. Feminist
Media Studies, 5 (3), 297–310.
Taylor, B. C. (1998). Nuclear weapons and communication studies: A review essay. Western Journal of
Communication (includes Communication Reports), 62(3), 300–315.
Taylor, B. C. (2003). ‘Our bruised arms hung up as monuments’: Nuclear iconography in post-cold war
culture. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 20(1), 1–34.
Taylor, I. (2008). Surveying the battlefield: Mapping the different arguments and positions of the Iraq war
debate through frame analysis1. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 5(3), 69–90.
Taylor, B. C., Kinsella, W. J., Depoe, S. P., & Metzler, M. S. (Eds.). (2007). Nuclear legacies:
Communication, controversy, and the US nuclear weapons complex. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Tebbutt, J. (2011). Towards a history of listening and surveillance. Continuum: Journal of Media &
Cultural Studies, 25(2), 239–249.
Treat, S. (2009). How America learned to stop worrying and cynically ENJOY! The post-9/11 superhero
zeitgeist.
5A1
Tsfati, Y., Tukachinsky, R., & Peri, Y. (2009). Exposure to news, political comedy, and entertainment talk
shows: Concern about security and political mistrust. International Journal of Public Opinion Research,
21(4), 399–423.
Tulloch, J., & Blood, R. W. (2012). Icons of war and terror: Media images in an age of international risk.
London: Routledge. Van Ham, P. (2003). War, lies, and videotape: Public diplomacy and the USA’s war
on terrorism. Security Dialogue, 34(4),
427–444.
Vujakovic, P. (2002). Mapping the war zone: Cartography, geopolitics and security discourse in the UK
press. Journalism Studies, 3(2), 187–202.
Vultee, F. (2010). Securitization: A new approach to the framing of the ‘war on terror’. Journalism
Practice, 4(1), 33–47. Wajcman, J., & Jones, P. K. (2012). Border communication: Media sociology and
STS. Media, Culture & Society, 34(6), 673–
690.
Wæver, O. (1995). Securitization and desecuritization. In R. D. Lipschutz (Ed.), On security (pp. 46–86).
New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Walsh, L., & Barbara, J. (2006). Speed, international security, and ‘new war’ coverage in cyberspace.
Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 12, 189–208.
Walters, W. (2014). Drone strikes, Dingpolitik and beyond: Furthering the debate on materiality and
security. Security Dialogue, 45(2), 101–118.
Weldes, J. (1999). Going cultural: Star Trek, state action, and popular culture. Millennium: Journal of
International Studies, 28, 117–134.
Wessels, E. (2011). ‘Where were you when the monster hit?’ Media convergence, branded security
citizenship, and the trans-media phenomenon of Cloverfield. Convergence: The International Journal of
Research into New Media Technologies, 17(1), 69–83.
Wildermuth, M. E. (2007). Electronic media and the feminine in the national security regime: The
Manchurian candidate before and after 9/11. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 35(3), 121–126.
Wilken, R. (2011). Fantasies of control: Numb3rs, scientific rationalism, and the management of everyday
security risks.
Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 25, 201–211.
Wilkins, K. G. (2012). Mapping the nation and security in global space: A comparative study of Danish,
Egyptian, and US action-adventure fans. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2609–2627.
Winthrop-Young, G. (2002). Drill and distraction in the yellow submarine: On the dominance of war in
Friedrich Kittler’s media theory. Critical Inquiry, 28(4), 825–854.
Zelizer, B. (2010). About to die: How news images move the public. New York, NY: Oxford University
Press. Zelizer, B., & Allan, S. (Eds.). (2011). Journalism after September 11. New York, NY: Taylor &
Francis.
Zollmann, F. (2009). Is it either or? Professional ideology vs. corporate-media constraints. Westminster
Papers in Communication and Culture, 6(2) 97–118.
5A1
Bryan C. Taylor, Hamilton Bean, Ned O’Gorman & Rebecca Rice,

(2017). A fearful engine of power: conceptualizing the
communication–security relationship. FU Berlin, 27.
1. Latar Belakang Masyarakat kontemporer menganggap bahwasannya konsep keamanan suatu konsep yang
sangatlah kompleks. Namun Dalam beberapa tahun terakhir, bisa dibilang, nilai 'keamanan'
telah menjadi yang utama/yang pokok. Konvergensi(konvergensi kebijakan neo-liberal,
neo-konservatif, dan neo-imperialis yang ditempuh oleh perusahaan multi-nasional,
negara, dan rezim internasional selama 40 tahun terakhir.) ini telah menghasilkan banyak
efek keamanan
2. Pertanyaan Riset/ Yang mereka lakukan saat ini ialah mencari tau mengenai konvergensi komunikasi keamanan
Problematisasi itu memang lah nyata atau tidak.
3. Tujuan/Objektif pertama, dengan membahas konvergensi interdisipliner yang berkembang di

sekitar studi komunikasi dan keamanan. Berikut ini, kami meninjau lima
subbidang beasiswa komunikasi yang secara jelas terkait dengan keamanan:
komunikasi strategis, analisis wacana, studi argumen publik, retorika, dan studi
komunikasi kritis-budaya
4. Rangkuman State of the Art Esai ini mengisolasi dan mengeksplorasi badan penelitian komunikasi yang berkembang
(SoA) yang berkaitan dengan ‘keamanan.’ Ini dibuka dengan mendefinisikan konsep ini, dan
mendiskusikan tren geopolitik dan interdisipliner terkini yang berkontribusi pada
hubungannya dengan komunikasi.
6. Kerangka Teoretis/ Keamanan; hubungan Internasional; komunikasi strategis; analisis wacana; studi
Konseptual argumen publik; retorik; studi komunikasi kritis-budaya
7. Metode Kualitatif
5A1
8. Argumen Utama Konvergensi ini telah menghasilkan banyak efek keamanan, termasuk 'precarity' (suatu
kondisi keberadaan tanpa prediktabilitas atau keamanan, memengaruhi kesejahteraan
materi atau psikologis.) dari warga negara yang kehilangan hak dan perlindungan
tradisional (misalnya akses ke perawatan kesehatan dan pekerjaan yang stabil),
penggunaan konsep ancaman-resmi oleh serikat internasional risiko profesional- manajer.
(Bigo, 2012)
9. Argumen Penunjang Sumber daya ini diperlukan untuk mendukung keterlibatan lapangan kami dengan
fenomena keamanan yang berkembang, hibrida - dan terkadang kontradiktif, seperti
kolonisasi militeristik upaya bantuan kemanusiaan (Motter, 2010)
10. Kutipan Secara bergantian, kita harus merenungkan bagaimana itu mendukung, memperluas,
menantang - dan berpotensi menggusur - tradisi ilmiah yang dikhususkan untuk topik-
topik serumpun seperti perdamaian, perang, konflik, dan pemerintahan. Misalnya, genre
yang diusulkan 'retorika keamanan nasional' (Hasian, Lawson, & McFarlane, 2015)
11. Komentar Bagian mengenai urgensi menurut saya, pentingnya kita menyadari bahwasannya factor
yang membuat kita tidak merasakan aman bukan lah sebuah negara melainkan sebuah
suku,ras (di dalam Negara).
12. Daftar Pustaka
Albert, M., Kessler, O., & Stetter, S. (2008). On order and conflict: International relations and the
‘communicative turn’.
Review of International Studies, 34(S1), 43–67. doi:10.1017/S0260210508007791
Andrejevic, M. (2006). Interactive (in)security: The participatory promise of ready. Cultural Studies, 20(4–5),
441–458. doi:10.1080/09502380600708838
Andrejevic, M. (2009). iSpy: Surveillance and power in the interactive era. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
Aradau, C., & Van Munster, R. (2010). Post-structuralism, continental philosophy, and the remaking of
security studies. In
M. D. Cavelty, V. Mauer, & T. Balzacq (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of security studies (pp. 73–83).
Bajc, V. (2013). Sociological reflections on security through surveillance. Sociological Forum, 28(3), 615–
623. doi:10.1111/ socf.12040
Balan, N. (2010). A corrective for cultural studies: Beyond the militarization thesis to the new military
intelligence. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 23–24, 144–177.
Balzacq, T. (Ed.). (2011). Securitization theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve. Abingdon:
Routledge.
Barney, T. (2014a). Diagnosing the third world: The “map doctor” and the spatialized discourses of disease
and develop- ment in the cold war. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 100, 1–30.
doi:10.1080/00335630.2014.887215
Barney, T. (2014b). Mapping the Cold War: Cartography and the framing of America’s international power.
Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
5A1
Bean, H. (2009). “A complicated and frustrating dance”: National security reform, the limits of parrhesia,
and the case of the 9/11 families. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 12, 429–459. doi:10.1353/rap.0.0108
Bean, H. (2013). Rhetorical and critical/cultural intelligence studies. Intelligence and National Security, 28,
495–519. doi:10.
1080/02684527.2012.699284
Bean, H. (2016). Strategic communication and U.S. national security affairs: Critical-cultural and rhetorical
perspectives. In
A. Dudo & L. Kahlor (Eds.), Strategic communication: New agendas in communication (pp. 105–124). New
York, NY: Routledge.
Bean, H., Keränen, L., & Durfy, M. (2011). “This is London”: Cosmopolitan nationalism and the discourse of
resilience in the case of the 7/7 terrorist attacks. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 14, 427–464.
doi:10.1353/rap.2011.0018
Beer, F. A., & Hariman, R. (Eds.). (1996). Post-realism: The rhetorical turn in international relations. East
Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Bennett Furlow, R. B., & Goodall Jr., H. L. (2011). The war of ideas and the battle of narratives: A
comparison of extremist storytelling structures. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 11, 215–223.
doi:10.1177/1532708611409530
Berinsky, A. J. (2009). In time of war: Understanding American public opinion from World War II to Iraq.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Berland, J., & Fitzpatrick, B. (2010). Introduction: Cultures of militarization and the military-cultural complex.
TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 23–24, 9–27.
Biesecker, B. A. (2007). Forum introduction. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 4, 204.
doi:10.1080/ 14791420802024319
Bigo, D. (2012). Globalization and security. In E. Amenta, K. Nash, & A. Scott (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell
companion to political sociology (pp. 204–213). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
Bockstette, C. (2010). Jihadist terrorist use of strategic communication management techniques. Darby,
PA: Diane. Bostdorff, D. M. (2008). Proclaiming the Truman Doctrine: The Cold War call to arms. College
Station: Texas A&M University
Press.
Broda-Bahm, K. T. (1999). Finding protection in definitions: The quest for environmental security.
Argumentation and Advocacy, 35(4), 159–170.
Browne, S. (2015). Dark matters: On the surveillance of blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Butterworth, M. L. (2010). Baseball and rhetorics of purity: The national pastime and American identity
during the war on terror. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Butterworth, M. L., & Moskal, S. D. (2009). American football, flags, and “fun”: The Bell Helicopter Armed
Forces Bowl and the rhetorical production of militarism. Communication, Culture & Critique, 2(4), 411–433.
doi:10.1111/j.1753-9173. 2009.01046.x
Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2009). The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Cahill, S. (2010). Conflict(ing) narratives: Representations of war in The Battleground Project and the
performative potential of audience. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 23–24, 190–202.
Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign.
Discourse & Society, 17, 563–581. doi:10.1177/0957926506066345
Chávez, K. R. (2010). Border (in)securities: Normative and differential belonging in LGBTQ and immigrant
rights discourse.
Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 7, 136–155. doi:10.1080/14791421003763291
Cheshier, D. M., & Dauber, C. E. (1998). The place and power of civic space: Reading globalization and
social geography through the lens of civilizational conflict. Security Studies, 8(2–3), 35–70.
doi:10.1080/09636419808429374
Chilton, P. A. (1996). Security metaphors: Cold war discourse from containment to common house. Bern:
Peter Lang. Cioppa, T. M. (2009). Operation Iraqi freedom strategic communication analysis and
assessment. Media, War & Conflict, 2,
25–45. doi:10.1177/1750635208101353
Cisneros, D. (2014). The border crossed us: Rhetorics of borders, citizenship, and Latino/a identity.
Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Cloud, D. L. (2004). “To veil the threat of terror”: Afghan women and the ⟨clash of civilizations⟩ in the
imagery of the U.S.
war on terrorism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 90(3), 285–306. doi:10.1080/003356304200027026
Cole, T. M. (1999). Avoiding the quagmire: Alternative rhetorical constructs for post-cold war American
foreign policy.
Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 2, 367–393. doi:10.1353/rap.2010.0137
Compton, J. (2010). Fear and spectacle on the planet of slums. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural
Studies, 23–24, 345– 362.
5A1
Connelly, E. (2012). State secrets and redaction: The interaction between silence and ideographs. Western
Journal of Communication, 76(3), 236–249. doi:10.1080/10570314.2011.653470
Constantinou, C. M. (2008). Communications/excommunications: An interview with Armand Mattelart.
Review of International Studies, 34(S1), 21–42. doi:10.1017/S0260210508007766
Constantinou, C. M., Richmond, O. P., & Watson, A. (2008). International relations and the challenges of
global communication. Review of International Studies, 34(1), 5–19. doi:10.1017/S026021050800778X
Copeland, D. (2013). Taking diplomacy public: Science, technology, and foreign ministries in a heteropolar
world. In R. S. Zaharna, E. Arsenault, & A. Fisher (Eds.), Relational, networked and collaborative
approaches to public diplomacy: The connective mindshift (pp. 56–69). New York, NY: Routledge.
Corman, S. R., Trethewey, A., & Goodall Jr., H. L. (Eds.). (2008). Weapons of mass persuasion: Strategic
communication to combat violent extremism. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Cull, N. J., Culbert, D., & Welch, D. (2003). Propaganda and mass persuasion: A historical encyclopedia
1500 to the present.
Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Dalby, S. (1997). Contesting an essential concept: Reading the dilemmas in contemporary security
discourse. In K. Krause & M. C. Williams (Eds.), Critical security studies: Concepts and cases (pp. 3–31).
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dauber, C. E. (2001). Implications of the Weinberger Doctrine for American military intervention in a post-
desert storm age. Contemporary Security Policy, 22(3), 66–90. doi:10.1080/135232605123313911238
De Beaugrande, R. (2004). Critical discourse analysis from the perspective of ecologism: The discourse of
the “new patri- otism” for the “new secrecy”. Critical Discourse Studies, 1, 113–145.
doi:10.1080/17405900410001674542
Debrix, F. (Ed.). (2003). Language, agency, and politics in a constructed world. London: M.E. Sharpe.
Dechaine, D. R. (2009). Bordering the civic imaginary: Alienization, fence logic, and the minuteman civil
defense corps.
Quarterly Journal of Speech, 95, 43–65. doi:10.1080/00335630802621078
Der Derian, J., & Shapiro, M. J. (1989). International/intertextual relations: Postmodern readings of world
politics. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Di Carlo, G. S. (2013). Vagueness as a political strategy: Weasel words in security council resolutions
relating to the second Gulf War. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Dubrofsky, R. E., & Magnet, S. A. (Eds.). (2015). Feminist surveillance studies. Durham, NC: Duke
University Press. Dunmire, P. L. (2005). Preempting the future: Rhetoric and ideology of the future in
political discourse. Discourse & Society,
16(4), 481–513. doi:10.1177/0957926505053052
Dunmire, P. L. (2009). “9/11 changed everything”: An intertextual analysis of the Bush Doctrine. Discourse
& Society, 20(2), 195–222. doi:10.1177/0957926508099002
Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2006). U.S. public diplomacy in the Middle East: A critical cultural approach. Journal
of Communication Inquiry, 30, 102–124. doi:10.1177/0196859905285286
Earle, C. (2015). Good Muslims, bad Muslims, and the nation: The “Ground Zero mosque” and the problem
with tolerance.
Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 12(2), 121–138. doi:10.1080/14791420.2015.1008529
Edwards, J. A., Valenzano, J. M., & Stevenson, K. (2011). The peacekeeping mission: Bringing stability to
a chaotic scene.
Communication Quarterly, 59(3), 339–358.
doi:10.1080/01463373.2011.583497 Elmer, G., & Opel, A. (2006). Surviving the inevitable future:
Preemption in an age of faulty intelligence. Cultural Studies, 20
(4–5), 477–492. doi:10.1080/09502380600708929
Endres, D. (2009a). From wasteland to waste site: The role of discourse in nuclear power’s environmental
injustices. Local Environment, 14(10), 917–937. doi:10.1080/13549830903244409
Endres, D. (2009b). The rhetoric of nuclear colonialism: Rhetorical exclusion of American Indian arguments
in the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste siting decision. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 6(1),
39–60. doi:10.1080/ 14791420802632103
Engels, J. (2009). Friend or foe?: Naming the enemy. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 12, 37–64.
doi:10.1353/rap.0.0096
English, E., Llano, S., Mitchell, G. R., Morrison, C. E., Rief, J., & Woods, C. (2007). Debate as a weapon of
mass destruction.
Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 4, 221–225.
doi:10.1080/14791420701296646 Eyre, D. P., & Littleton, J. R. (2012). Shaping the zeitgeist: Influencing
social processes as the center of gravity for strategic
5A1
communications in the twenty-first century. Public Relations Review, 38, 179–187.
doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.006 Farrell, T. (1995). Norms of rhetorical culture. New Haven, CT: Yale
University Press.
Farwell, J. P. (2012). Persuasion and power: The art of strategic communication. Washington, DC:
Georgetown University Press.
Finnegan, C. A., & Keranen, L. (2011). Review essay: Addressing the epidemic of epidemics: Germs,
security, and a call for biocriticism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 97(2), 224–244.
doi:10.1080/00335630.2011.565785
Fitzpatrick, K., Fullerton, J., & Kendrick, A. (2013). Public relations and public diplomacy: Conceptual and
practical connec- tions. Public Relations Journal, 7(4), 1–21.
Genosko, G. (2010). The terrorist entrepreneur. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 23–24,
330–344. Goldstein, D. M. (2010). Toward a critical anthropology of security. Current Anthropology, 51,
487–517. doi:10.1086/655393 Goodnight, G. T., & Green, S. (2010). Rhetoric, risk, and markets: The dot-
com bubble. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 96, 115–
140. doi:10.1080/00335631003796669
Goodnight, T. G. (2006). Strategic doctrine, public debate, and the terror war. In William W. Keller &
Gordon R. Mitchell (Eds.), Hitting first: Preventative force in U.S. security strategy (pp. 93–114). Pittsburgh,
PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Graham, P., Keenan, T., & Dowd, A. M. (2004). A call to arms at the
end of history: A discourse–historical analysis of George
W. Bush’s declaration of war on terror. Discourse & Society, 15, 199–221. doi:10.1177/0957926504041017
Greene, R. W., & Hicks, D. (2010). Conscientious objections: Debating both sides and the cultures of
democracy. In D. Gouran (Ed.), Selected essays of the sixteenth annual conference on argumentation (pp.
172–178). Washington, D.C.: National Communication Association.
Grey, C. (2009). Security studies and organization studies: Parallels and possibilities. Organization, 16(2),
303–316. doi:10.
1177/1350508408100480
Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gusterson, H., & Besteman, C. (Eds.). (2010). The insecure American: How we got here and what we
should do about it.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Günter Brauch, H. (2005). Threats, challenges, vulnerabilities and risks in environmental and human
security. United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security. Retrieved from
http://collections.unu.edu/view/UNU:1868 Hafen, S. (2009). Patriots in the classroom: Performing
positionalities post 9/11. Communication and Critical/Cultural
Studies, 6(1), 61–83. doi:10.1080/14791420802632111
Hall, R. (2015). The transparent traveler: The performance and culture of airport security. Durham, NC:
Duke University Press. Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., Van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007).
Defining strategic communication.
International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1, 3–35. doi:10.1080/15531180701285244 Hansen, L.
(2006). Security as practice: Discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hart, C., & Feenberg, A. (2014). The insecurity of innovation: A critical analysis of cybersecurity in the
United States.
International Journal of Communication, 8, 2860–2878.
Hartnett, S. J., & Goodale, G. (2008). The demise of democratic deliberation: The Defense Science Board,
the military– industrial complex, and the production of imperial propaganda. In D. Timmerman & T.
McDorman (Eds.), Rhetoric and democracy: Pedagogical and political practices (pp. 181–224). East
Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Hartnett, S. J., & Stengrim, L. A. (2006). Globalization & empire: The U.S. Invasion of Iraq, free markets,
and the twilight of democracy. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Hasian Jr., M. (2006). Unitary executives, rhetorical histories, and the national security agency’s strategic
remembrances of the foreign intelligence surveillance act (FISA). Free Speech Yearbook, 43, 1–19.
doi:10.1080/08997225.2006.10556326 Hasian Jr., M. (2011). The Simon Mann trial, the demise of the
“dogs of war,” and the discursive legitimation of “humanitarian” private security companies in Africa.
Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 4(4), 272–289.
doi:10.1080/17513057.2011.582954
Hasian Jr., M., Lawson, S., & McFarlane, M. D. (2015). The rhetorical invention of America’s national
security state. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Hay, J. (2007). The many responsibilities of the new citizen-soldier. Communication and Critical/Cultural
Studies, 4(2), 216– 220. doi:10.1080/14791420701296604
5A1
Hay, J., & Andrejevic, M. (2006). Introduction: Toward an analytic of governmental experiments in these
times: homeland security as the new social security. Cultural Studies, 20(4–5), 331–348.
doi:10.1080/09502380600708747
Hayden, C. (2007). Arguing public diplomacy: The role of argument formations in US foreign policy rhetoric.
The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2, 229–254. doi:10.1163/187119007x240514
Herschinger, E. (2011). Constructing global enemies: Hegemony and identity in international discourses on
terrorism and drug prohibition. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hogan, J. M. (2000). The science of Cold War strategy: Propaganda and public opinion in the Eisenhower
administration’s ‘war of words’. In M. J. Medhurst & H. W. Brands (Eds.), Critical reflections on the Cold
War: Linking rhetoric and history (pp. 154–1155). College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
Hutchison, E. (2010). Trauma and the politics of emotions: Constituting identity, security and community
after the Bali bombing. International Relations, 24, 65–86. doi:10.1177/0047117809348712
Ivie, R. L. (1999). Fire, flood, and red fever: Motivating metaphors of global emergency in the Truman
Doctrine speech.
Presidential Studies Quarterly, 29(3), 570–591. doi:10.1111/j.0268-2141.2003.00050.x
Ivie, R. L. (2005). Democracy and America’s war on terror. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Ivie, R. L., & Giner, O. (2009). More good, less evil: Contesting the mythos of national insecurity in the
2008 presidential primaries. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 12, 279–301. doi:10.1353/rap.0.0087
Jensen, K. B. (2013). The cultural contexts of media and communication. In K. B. Jensen (Ed.), A
handbook of media and communication research: Qualitative and quantitative methodologies (pp. 203–
218). New York, NY: Routledge.
Kaufer, D., & Al-Malki, A. M. (2009). The war on terror through Arab-American eyes: The Arab-American
press as a rhetorical counterpublic. Rhetoric Review, 28(1), 47–65. doi:10.1080/07350190802540724
Keller, W. W., & Mitchell, G. R. (Eds.). (2006). Hitting first: Preventive force in US security strategy.
Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Khakimova, L. F. (2013). Public diplomacy at Arab embassies: Fighting an uphill battle. International
Journal of Strategic Communication, 7(1), 21–42. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2012.738446
Kienscherf, M. (2010). Plugging cultural knowledge into the US military machine: The neo-orientalist logic
of counterin- surgency. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 23–24, 121–143.
Krause, K., & Williams, M. C. (Eds.). (1997). Critical security studies: Concepts and cases (pp. vii–xxi).
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lasswell, H. D. (1941). The garrison state. American Journal of Sociology, 46, 455–468.
doi:10.1086/218693
Lawson, S. T. (2013a). Nonlinear science and warfare: Chaos, complexity and the US military in the
information age.
Lawson, S. T. (2013b). Beyond cyber-doom: Assessing the limits of hypothetical scenarios in the framing of
cyber-threats.
Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10(1), 86–103.
Leff, M. (2003). Tradition and agency in humanistic rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 36, 135–147.
doi:10.1353/par.2003.
0019
Lemish, D., & Barzel, I. (2000). ‘Four Mothers’: The womb in the public sphere. European Journal of
Communication, 15, 147–169. doi:10.1177/0267323100015002001
Lindsay, J. R., Cheung, T. M., & Reveron, D. S. (Eds.). (2015). China and cybersecurity: Espionage,
strategy, and politics in the digital domain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lipschutz, R. D. (Ed.). (1995). On security. New York, NY: Columbia
University Press. Louw, E. P. (2003). The ‘war against terrorism’: A public relations challenge for the
Pentagon. International Communication
Gazette, 65, 211–230. doi:10.1177/0016549203065003001
MacDonald, M. N., Hunter, D., & O’Regan, J. P. (2013). Citizenship, community, and counter-terrorism: UK
security discourse, 2001–2011. Journal of Language & Politics, 12(3), 445–473.
doi:10.1075/jlp.12.3.07mac
Magnet, S., & Gates, K. (2013). Communicating surveillance: Examining the intersections. In S. Magnet &
K. Gates (Eds.),
The new media of surveillance (pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Routledge.
Marusek, S. K. (2007). Between disability and terror: Handicapped parking space and homeland security at
Fenway Park. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique,
20, 251–261. doi:10.1007/ s11196-007-9043-3
Masco, J. (2014). The theater of operations: National security affect from the Cold War to the war on terror.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5A1
Mattelart, A. (1986/1994). Mapping world communication: War, progress, culture. (S. Emanuel & J. A.
Cohen, Trans.).
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Matusitz, J. (2013). Interpersonal communication perspectives in hostage negotiation. Journal of Applied
Security Research,
8(1), 24–37. doi:10.1080/19361610.2013.738406
McCready, A. L. (2010). Tie a yellow ribbon ‘round public discourse, national identity and the war:
Neoliberal militarization and the yellow ribbon campaign in Canada. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural
Studies, 23–24, 28–51.
McKenna, C. R. (2010). Canadian and American cultures of militarism: Coping mechanisms in a military-
industrial-service- complex. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 23–24, 77–99.
McKie, D., & Munshi, D. (2007). Reconfiguring public relations: Ecology, equity, and enterprise. London:
Routledge. Medhurst, M. J. (1993). Dwight D. Eisenhower: Strategic communicator. Westport, CT:
Greenwood Press.
Medhurst, M. J., Ivie, R. L., & Wander, P. (Eds.) (1990). Cold war as rhetoric: Strategy, metaphor, and
ideology. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
Meyer, D. S. (1995). Framing national security: Elite public discourse on nuclear weapons during the Cold
War. Political Communication, 12, 173–192. doi:10.1080/10584609.1995.9963064
Milliken, J. (1999). The study of discourse in international relations: A critique of research and methods.
European Journal of International Relations, 5, 225–254. doi:10.1177/1354066199005002003
Mirrlees, T. (2008). Review essay: Historicizing US imperial culture. The Communication Review, 11(2),
176–191. doi:10.
1016/10.1080/10714420802068409
Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic narratives: Communication power and the
new world order.
Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2012). Forging the world: Strategic narratives and
international relations (Centre for European Politics/New Political Communications Unit Working Paper).
Retrieved from http://newpolcom. rhul.ac.uk/storage/Forging20the 20World
20Working20Paper%202012.pdf
Mitchell, G. R. (2000). Strategic deception: Rhetoric, science, and politics in missile defense advocacy.
East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Mitchell, G. R. (2002). Public argument-driven security studies. Argumentation & Advocacy, 39, 57–71.
Mitchell, G. R. (2006). Team B intelligence coups. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92, 144–173. doi:10.1080/
00335630600817993
Monahan, T. (2010). Surveillance in the time of insecurity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
Monahan, T. (2015). The right to hide? Anti-surveillance camouflage and the aestheticization of resistance.
Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 12(2), 159–178. doi:10.1080/14791420.2015.1006646
Motter, J. (2010). American exceptionalism and the rhetoric of humanitarian militarism: The case of the
2004 Indian Ocean tsunami relief effort. Communication Studies, 61(5), 507–525.
doi:10.1080/10510974.2010.514834
Na’puti, T. R., & Bevacqua, M. L. (2015). Militarization and resistance from Guåhan: Protecting and
defending Pågat.
American Quarterly, 67(3), 837–858. doi:10.1353/aq.2015.0040
Nisbet, E. C., Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., & Shanahan, J. E. (2004). Public diplomacy, television news,
and Muslim opinion. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9(2), 11–37.
doi:10.1177/1081180X04263459
O’Gorman, N. (2011). Spirits of the Cold War: Contesting worldviews in the classical Age of American
security strategy.
Lansing, MI: MSU Press.
O’Gorman, N., & Hamilton, K. (2011). At the interface: The loaded rhetorical gestures of nuclear legitimacy
and illegiti- macy. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 8(1), 41–66.
doi:10.1080/14791420.2010.543986
Ohl, J. J. (2015). Nothing to see or fear: Light war and the boring visual rhetoric of U.S. drone imagery.
Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101, 612–632. doi:10.1080/00335630.2015.1128115
Ono, K. (2009). Critical/cultural approaches to communication. In W. E. Eadie (Ed.), 21st century

communication: A reference handbook (pp. 74–81). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ott, B. L., Bean, H., & Marin, K. (2016). On the aesthetic production of atmospheres: The rhetorical
workings of biopower at The CELL. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 13(4), 346–362.
doi:10.1080/14791420.2016.1195505
5A1
Parry-Giles, S. J. (2002). The rhetorical presidency, propaganda, and the Cold War, 1945–1955. Westport,
CT: Praeger. Paul, C. (2011). Strategic communication: Origins, concepts, and current debates. Santa
Monica, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Peeples, J. (2011). Toxic sublime: Imaging contaminated landscapes. Environmental Communication: A
Journal of Nature and Culture, 5(4), 373–392. doi:10.1080/17524032.2011.616516
Rich, M. H., & Craig, R. T. (2012). Habermas and Bateson in a world gone MAD: Metacommunication,
paradox, and the inverted speech situation. Communication Theory, 22, 383–402. doi:10.1111/j.1468-
2885.2012.01412.x
Riley, E. (2010). Operation Nunalivut: Photo essay. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 23–
24, 178–189. Riley, P., & Hollihan, T. A. (2012). Strategic communication: How governments frame
arguments in the media. In F. H. van
Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Exploring argumentative contexts (pp. 61–77). Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Roberts, D. E. (2015). Race, gender, and genetic technologies: A new reproductive dystopia? In R. E.
Dubrofsky & S. A. Magnet (Eds.), Feminist surveillance studies (pp. 169–187). Durham, NC: Duke
University Press.
Rojecki, A. (2008). Rhetorical alchemy: American exceptionalism and the war on terror. Political
Communication, 25(1), 67– 88. doi:10.1080/10584600701807935
Saghaye-Biria, H. (2012). American Muslims as radicals? A critical discourse analysis of the US
congressional hearing on “The extent of radicalization in the American Muslim community and that
community’s response”. Discourse & Society, 23, 508–524. doi:10.1177/0957926512452972
Schiller, D. (2008). The militarization of US communications. Communication, Culture & Critique, 1(1), 126–
138. doi:10.
1111/j.1753-9137.2007.00013.x
Schiller, H. (1969). Mass communications and American empire. New York, NY: A.M. Kelley.
Seib, P. (2009). Toward a new public diplomacy: Redirecting U.S. foreign policy. New York, NY: Palgrave
Macmillan. Simone, M. A. (2009). Give me liberty and give me surveillance: A case study of the US
Government’s discourse of sur-
veillance. Critical Discourse Studies, 6, 1–14. doi:10.1080/17405900802559977
Simpson, C. (1994). Science of coercion: Communication research and psychological warfare 1945–1960.
New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Snow, N. (2002). Propaganda, Inc. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Seven
Stories Press. Stahl, R. (2008). A clockwork war: Rhetorics of time in a time of terror. Quarterly Journal
of Speech, 94, 73–99. doi:10.1080/
00335630701790826
START: National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. (n.d.). About START.
Retrieved from http://www.start.umd.edu/about/about-start
Stritzel, H. (2012). Securitization, power, intertextuality: Discourse theory and the translations of organized
crime. Security Dialogue, 43(6), 549–567. doi:10.1177/0967010612463953
Taylor, B. C. (2010). “A hedge against the future”: The post-Cold War rhetoric of nuclear weapons
modernization. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 96(1), 1–24. doi:10.1080/00335630903512721
Taylor, B. C. (2017). ‘The movie has to go forward’: Surveying the media-security relationship. The Annals
of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 46–69. doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1288069.
Taylor, B. C., & Hendry, J. (2008). Insisting on persisting: The nuclear rhetoric of “stockpile stewardship”.
Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 11, 303–334. doi:10.1353/rap.0.0040
Taylor, B., Kinsella, W. J., Depoe, S. P., & Metzler, M. S. (Eds.). (2007). Nuclear legacies: Communication,
controversy, and the
U.S. nuclear weapons complex. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Thucydides. (1972). The history of the peloponnesian War. (R. Warner, Trans.). Translated by Rex Warner.
New York, NY: Penguin. (Original work published 431 BCE)
Triangle Institute for Security Studies. (n.d.). About TISS. Retrieved from
http://tiss-nc.org/ Vicaro, M. P. (2016). Deconstitutive rhetoric: The destruction of legal personhood in the
global war on terrorism. Quarterly
Journal of Speech, 102, 333–352. doi:10.1080/00335630.2016.1209547
Wæver, O. (1995). Securitization and desecuritization. In R. Lipschutz (Ed.), On security (pp. 46–86). New
York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Walker, M. K. (2016, November). How communication scholars and national security policy makers can
work together to solve wicked problems. Panel session presented at the meeting of The National
Communication Association, Philadelphia, PA.
Walker, R. B. (1997). The subject of security. In K. Krause & M. C. Williams (Eds.), Critical security studies:
Concepts and cases (pp. 61–82). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Wedeen, L. (1999). Ambiguities of domination: Politics, rhetoric, and symbols in contemporary Syria.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5A1
Weldes, J. (1999). The cultural production of crises: U.S. identity and missiles in Cuba. In J. Weldes, M.
Laffey, H. Gusterson, & R. Duvall (Eds.), Cultures of insecurity: States, communities, and the production of
danger (pp. 35–62). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Williams, M. C. (2007). Culture and security: Symbolic power and the politics of international security.
London: Routledge.
Winkler, J. R. (2008). Nexus: Strategic communications and American security in World War I. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Winseck, D. (2008). Information operations ‘blowback’: Communication, propaganda and surveillance in
the global war on terrorism. International Communication Gazette, 70, 419–441.
doi:10.1177/1748048508096141
Wolfe, D. P. (2007). Sidestepping environmental controversy through a rhetoric of security: George W.
Bush in Summerhaven, Arizona. Western Journal of Communication, 71(1), 28–48.
doi:10.1080/10570310701199178
Yang, A., Klyueva, A., & Taylor, M. (2012). Beyond a dyadic approach to public diplomacy: Understanding
relationships in multipolar world. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 652–664.
doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.07.005
Yesil, B. (2006). Watching ourselves: Video surveillance, urban space and self-responsibilization. Cultural
Studies, 20(4–5), 400–416. doi:10.1080/09502380600708770
Zaharna, R. S., Arsenault, E., & Fisher, A. (Eds.). (2013). Relational, networked and collaborative
approaches to public diplomacy: The connective mindshift. New York, NY: Routledge.
Zarefsky, D. (2007). Making the case for war: Colin Powell at the United Nations. Rhetoric & Public Affairs,
10(2), 275–302. doi:10.1353/rap.2007.0043
Zhang, J. (2007). Beyond anti-terrorism: Metaphors as message strategy of post-September-11 U.S. public
diplomacy.
Public Relations Review, 33(1), 31–39. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.006

Evitha Virgina Bera - Tabel Jurnal

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Evitha Virgina Bera - Tabel Jurnal

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Evitha Virgina Bera - Tabel Jurnal

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Komunikasi Keamanan |

DISIAPKAN OLEH Evitha Virgina Bera (201710415152)

Malcolm N. MacDonald & Duncan Hunter, (2019). The Discourse

• to explore the extent to which the principles of governmentality are

4. Rangkuman State of the Art

6. Kerangka Teoretis/ 9/11, linguistic, discourse

12. Daftar Pustaka

DISIAPKAN OLEH Evitha Virgina Bera (201710415152)

Taylor C. Bryan , (2017). ‘The movie has to go forward’:

6. Kerangka Teoretis/ Media; keamanan; senjata nuklir

12. Daftar Pustaka

DISIAPKAN OLEH Evitha Virgina Bera (201710415152)

Bryan C. Taylor, Hamilton Bean, Ned O’Gorman & Rebecca Rice,

3. Tujuan/Objektif pertama, dengan membahas konvergensi interdisipliner yang berkembang di

12. Daftar Pustaka

Ono, K. (2009). Critical/cultural approaches to communication. In W. E. Eadie (Ed.), 21st century

You might also like