Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter Iii - Methodology
Chapter Iii - Methodology
This study, which was based in the constructivist paradigm, used a phenomenological
strategy to explain Grade IX students' the effects of using gadgets in the academic
performance.. This chapter describes the research paradigm, approach, and design
that were used to achieve the purposes of the study.
Constructivist Paradigm
A qualitative research approach for this study was chosen because qualitative
methods are especially useful in discovering the meaning that people give to events
that they experience (Merriam, 1998). Specifically, the phenomenological method was
used to understand how participants make meaning of the phenomenon being studied;
i.e., the effects of gadgets in the academic performance of grade 9 students..
Phenomenology is effective in studying a small number of subjects – in this case,
15 participants – to identify the core of their experiences with the phenomenon
(Creswell, 2003) and to produce patterns and identify relationships of meaning that
build new knowledge (Moustakes, 1994).
The qualitative research methods used for this study are described further below
and included purposive sampling, open-ended interviewing, and systematic and
concurrent data collection and data analysis procedures. Specifically, the grounded
theory or constant comparative method (Glaser & Strauss, 1967) was used to analyze
the data and discover the effects of gadgets in the academic performance grade 9
students of review board approved the purpose and procedures for this study
(Appendix C).
Research Design
Procedures for selecting study participants and collecting and analyzing data are
described in this section.
Participants
Grade 9 students are the chosen participants of the study the effects of gadgets in
the academic performance. The goal of the study is to identify the effects of
gadgets in the academic performance, it is important that participants experience
using gadgets in school. The experiences that participants had during this first
year of college gave them a basis from which to compare their college readiness to
other first-year college students who were not exposed to a 1:1 laptop initiative
in high school.