Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contribution To The Professionalization of The Field of Peace-Building
Contribution To The Professionalization of The Field of Peace-Building
The peace initiatives on the micro level addressed the problems of the communities such
as IDPs, the citizens living near the contact line etc. The PCC program in Ukraine sought to
deal with a broad complex of issues such as trauma healing, inclusion of the people suffering
from stigmatization, low level of awareness about nonviolent communication and conflict
transformation contributing to the conflict prevention on the Peace Writ Large level.
The Peace and Conflict Consultants programme (2017) was devoted to the strengthening
of the formed group of the Local Coordinators who acted as multipliers; implemented their
local workshops and started to develop their own network of peacebuilders. Since 2017 the
goal of building up the infrastructure for peace has been deeply embedded in each peace
initiative of the PCCs and Local Coordinators. At the beginning of the third phase, the PCCs
conducted the Training of Trainers for the Local Coordinators, where they helped the
multipliers to plan the local workshops leaving free space for creativity on the topic, target
audience and setting of the desirable goals of the initiatives.
Contribution to the Professionalization of the Field of Peace-building
The main actors which share the burden in restoring peace and stability in the country
are: state actors, intergovernmental organizations, foreign states (mainly through funding
different peace initiatives via embassies), NGOs both of the Ukrainian and foreign origin and
separate individuals (mediators and dialogue-facilitators).
The main areas of realization of the peace-building activities:
humanitarian activity for people who were directly affected by the armed conflict in
the East of Ukraine on government as well as on non-government-controlled areas
under the auspices of the UN;
strengthening the capacity of civil society in the area of peacebuilding through
workshops and through direct involvement of CSO into the resolution of particular
inter-group conflicts which is realized mainly by different NGOs;
organization of the dialogue initiatives enforced by different peacebuilding
organizations as well as by separate individuals;
support for the government authorities in the realization of reforms necessary to the
prevention of the relapse to inner instability and violent conflicts.
There are various programs and initiatives, which aim to develop capacities in
intercultural dialogue or dealing with conflicts. Below we give an overview about different
formats of trainings for peace-builders, this overview is not meant to be comprehensive but
should rather give an idea about different objectives, approaches and achievements of the
trainings for peace-builders.
The program consists of three levels, each of them includes 10 sessions for 45
minutes, which start with general notions of leadership and get deeper into peaceful conflict
resolution on a community-based level. The target groups of the project are students between
12 and 19.
Women connecting for Peace
It is one of one of the few programs in North Caucasus (Russian Federation), which
involve women into peace issues. The initiative publishes information materials on
approaches to reconciliation between the conflicting parties in the Caucasus. The main aim is
to improve the skills and opportunities for peacemaking and restore confidence between
internally displaced and conflict-affected women.102
Infrastructure for Peace Mapping
In 2016
The country team’s Theory of Change developed in 2016 was to contribute to shaping
a society in which citizens are conscious about their oppression and are capable to challenge
the structures and cultural norms that maintain and validate violence, by getting involved in
creative nonviolent actions and constructive social interventions. 2016 is also the year when
the country team adopted the name “BuclucPozitiv”, inspired by the web resource and book
Beautiful Trouble. Two workshops focused on theories, principles and tactics of nonviolent
action.
The participants got involved in creative nonviolent actions related to irregularities in the
electoral system and to public security.Integrating curricula standards would be one more
step towards professionalization of peacebuilders, which, in our opinion, leads to
increasing the quality of peacebuilding activities.
Relevance: the curriculum content should be linked to the socio-economic context of the
trainees as well as the current issues, influencing the local context in which they are working.
This also means that the trainers should be ready to adapt the content during the training for
peace-builders.
Consistency: components of the training should be planned and connected. The
trainers need to set a vision and discuss objectives of the concrete modules, as lack of
consistency leads to confusion and demotivation.
Practicability: by discussing the usefulness of the content and testing the acquired
competences, the participants get an opportunity to internalize how far the content of the
training is useful in the daily practice. Here practitioners include exercises, which require
implementing the new competencies.
Effectiveness: the modules should include sessions for reflection on the curriculum,
its content and approach. The programs, which consist of training modules and
implementation phases, should be particularly suitable for testing the effectiveness of the
curriculum, as participants can reflect on their own experience and express suggestions for
adjustments.
Sustainability: trainers should include regular evaluation and repetition of the covered
content and share with the participants more opportunities for continuous learning.
Multidimensionality
It is the involvement of the UN in Namibia in 1989 that represents the first attempt to
implement this paradigm. This peace operation goes far beyond the traditional supervision of
ceasefires and is mandated to assist the establishment of democratic political institutions as
well as monitor elections that would ensure the country’s independence.
The security dilemma that assaults groups involved in intrastate conflicts is considerably
higher than among countries involved in interstate conflicts, to the extent that the
strengthening of state authority involves the recovery of the monopoly of the legitimate
use of force and control of the entire territory; that is, it entails precisely the reconstitution
of a central political power with the capacity to impose itself over the remaining political
and military powers.
The military and security dimension of the peacebuilding model therefore has two
objectives: to establish a balance between the warring parties and to restrict the ability of
combatants to return to hostilities.
There is, accordingly, a program specifically aimed at soldiers, which includes the
standardized phases known as “DDR”: (1) demobilization, (2) disarmament and (3)
reintegration into civilian life or the national armed forces.
The politico-constitutional dimension
This dimension seeks to carry out a political transition that involves the legitimation
of government authority; reform of the State’s administration dismantled during the
conflict; and the transfer of tensions among conflicting groups to the institutional
level—that is the idea of politics as a continuation of the conflict through non-violent
means, a notion which comes from Michel Foucault and that Ramsbotham calls
“Clausewitz in reverse.
The political regime that underlies these changes is liberal democracy, which is
This dimension aims to reverse the particularly devastating impact of armed conflict
on a country’s socio-economic fabric, drawing upon international financial aid.
Following a continuum between relief, recovery and development,the international
community usually begins with humanitarian aid and also has a crucial role in
medium- to long-term support for the reconstruction of basic infrastructure and the
application of macroeconomic stabilization policies.