DEG BO03 Company Supervisors Evaluation Form

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

UNISEL-PT01-FS-KE-LI-BO03(DEG)

Effective date: 15 April 2019


Issue No: 1
UNIVERSITI SELANGOR
Faculty of Engineering & Life Sciences
Department of Engineering
UNISEL Bestari Jaya Campus
Jalan Timur Tambahan, Bestari Jaya
45600 Kuala Selangor, Selangor Darul Ehsan
Tel : 03-55223511

COMPANY SUPERVISOR’S EVALUATION FORM

To be completed by the Company Supervisor and submitted to the Academic Supervisor by the final week of the Industrial Training.
(Note: The total mark represents 40% of student’s overall performance.)

ACADEMIC SEMESTER:

Company Supervisor Information


Student Name & Matric No. : MOHD SHAHRIZAN BIN MOHMAD SHA

Company Supervisor Name : RUTHER AMBROSE LUMANIB

Designation / Department : TECHNICAL DEPARTMENT Company Name : JETAMA WATER SDN BHD

Topic Poor Average Good Excellent


(Weight) (0) (1) (2) (3) Points

◻ ◻ ◻ ◻
Hardly to identify Able to identify Able to identify Able to identify
Problem Solving problems. problems at surface problems with problems with
Skills level but unable to evident of critical evident of critical
produce ideas to thought to resolve thought to resolve
(1) resolve the problems. problems and display
problems. capabilities to solve.

Total Points for PLO 3 /3


◻ ◻ ◻ ◻
Difficulties to Able to manage Able to manage Able to manage
manage all resources related resources to related resources related resources
Managerial Skill
and given tasks solve technical systematically to systematically to
within time frame problem and given solve technical solve technical
(1)
tasks within time problem and given problem and given
frame tasks within time tasks prior to the
frame time frame

◻ ◻ ◻ ◻
No consideration of Taking consideration Taking consideration Taking consideration
Entrepreneurial financial perspective of financial of financial of financial
in solutions perspective in perspective in perspective in
(1) solutions solutions with proper solutions with cost
analysis effective.

Total Points for PLO 7 /6


◻ ◻ ◻ ◻
Unable to contribute Able to give some Able to contribute Able to contribute
Team Work
any duties as a team contribution as a effectively as a team effectively as a team
Performance
member team member member member and also
inspire other team
(1)
members

Page 1 of 4
◻ ◻ ◻ ◻
Unable to contribute Able to contribute Able to contribute Able to contribute
Leadership ideas, making some ideas, making various ideas, innovative ideas,
decision and some decision and making most decision making most decision
(1) demonstrate demonstrate few and demonstrate and demonstrate
responsibilities responsibilities high responsibilities responsibilities with
high confidence

Total Points for PLO 8 /6


◻ ◻ ◻ ◻
Poor oral and written Somewhat Good oral and Excellent oral and
Communication
skills; developed oral and written skills; written skills;
skills
Poor organization of written skills; well organized Excellent written
presentations with Presentations are presentations ; documents;
(1)
unclear main points slightly organized but and creative slides
and conclusions; not always effective; presentations:

Total Points for PLO 9 /3


◻ ◻ ◻ ◻
Lack of knowledge of Demonstrates few Demonstrates tools Expertly
the engineering tools knowledge of tools procedures demonstrates of the
Handling Tools
procedure and procedure and able independently and tools procedures and
requires help from to operate with help discuss with peers to gladly helps others to
(1)
others for basic from others solve technical solve technical
operation problems problems

◻ ◻ ◻ ◻
Results are Some results are not Data results are Results are accurate.
incomplete, correct and accurate with Observations are
inaccurate and very imprecise. reasonable precision very thorough and
imprecise Observations are Observations are may overcome
Data Interpretation Observations are incomplete or thorough possible errors in
incomplete or not unorganized Work is generally data collection
(2) included recorded neat and organized Work is neat and
organized
Includes appropriate
symbols, units and
significant digits

Total Points for PLO 10 /9


◻ ◻ ◻ ◻
Ethical issues No understanding Few understanding Good understanding Deep understanding
& knowledge of ethical knowledge of knowledge of all of professional
Professional or professional professional and important issues involved and
behaviour issues. ethical issues. professional and the ethical
ethical issues related implication of norm
(1) to various practices engineering practice
and decisions.

Total Points for PLO 11 /3


◻ ◻ ◻ ◻
Completes required Completes required Completes required Completes required
Initiative work but unable to work and identifies work, identifies and work, pursues and
identify opportunities opportunities to pursues grab opportunities to
(1) to expand expand knowledge, opportunities to expand knowledge,
knowledge, skills and skills and abilities. expand knowledge, skills and abilities.
abilities. skills and abilities.

◻ ◻ ◻ ◻
Explores a topic at a Explores a topic with Explores a topic in Explores a topic in
surface level, some evidence of depth, yielding depth yielding a rich
Learning Curiosity providing little insight depth, providing insight and/or awareness and/or
and/or information occasional insight information little known
(2) beyond the very and/or information indicating interest in information
basic facts indicating indicating mild the related field. indicating
low interest in the interest in the related intense interest in
related field. field. the related field.
Total Points for PLO 12 /9

OVERALL
◻ Poor ◻ Average ◻ Good ◻ Excellent TOTAL
PERFORMANCE

POINTS
REQUIRED
0–8 9–18 19–28 29–39 / 39

Comments:

Company Supervisor’s Signature & Official Stamp:

Date:
COMPANY’S FEEDBACK

Please fill the following for analysis purpose

PART A: Scope of Training

Type of training underwent by the student:

R&D
Technical Sales
Production/ Manufacturing
Consultancy
Design and Fabrication
Other (please specify) :
Service and Maintenance
_
Quality Assurance/ Control

PART B : Importance of skills/ qualities for recruitment

Instruction: Please assess the importance of future applicants’ skills/qualities for recruitment in your company

1 – Not Important at All


2 – Not Important
3 – Average
4 – Important
5 – Very Important

i) Technical knowledge (theory and hands-on) /


ii) Current GPA (3.0 or better)

iii) IT/ Computer skills (usage and interpretation)

iv) English language proficiency

v) Communication skills (verbal and written)

vi) Interpersonal skills

vii) Leadership skills

viii) Team working skills

ix) Problem solving skills

x) Decision making skills

xi) Competent and multi-tasking skill

xii) Entrepreneurial skills/ risk taker

xiii) Good work ethics/ professionalism

xiv) Motivation/ Initiative/ Creative

xv) Flexibility/ Adaptability

xvi) Self-confidence

You might also like