Implementation Guidelines - Final 08112017 PDF

PLANNING
& DESIGN
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Abu Dhabi National
Housing Guidelines
for Integrated
Communities
FINAL
This page intentionally left blank
CONTENTS
GlossaryVII
1 Introduction 2
1.1 Purpose 2
1.2 Planning & Design Process 2
1.3 Structure of Guideline 3
2 Stage 1: Strategic Definition 10

2.1 Overview 10
2.2 Process Diagram 11
2.3 Description 12
2.4 Forms 16
3 Stage 2: Preparation and Brief 26

3.1 Overview 26
3.2 Process Diagram (Master Planning) 27
3.3 Description (Master Planning) 28
3.4 Process Diagram (Building Design) 35
3.5 Description (Building Design) 36
3.6 Forms 40
4 Stage 3: Concept Design 50

4.1 Overview 50
4.4 Forms (Master Planning) 54
4.7 Forms (Building Design) 60
5 Stage 4: Developed Design 64

5.1 Overview 64
5.4 Forms (Master Planning) 68
5.7 Forms (Building Design) 74
6 Stage 5: Technical Design 78

6.1 Overview 78
Appendix 1 87
Glossary
Glossary
TERM DEFINITION
Building Approval Approval of building design by ADHA and the municipalities at key gate stages.
The Project Brief amended so that it is aligned with the Developed Design and any decisions
Detail Project Brief
made during Stage 4.
A stage of work that is primarily the responsibility of the DPM or developer and
Developed Design
involves detailed master plan and schematic architectural design.
Detailed Master Plan Report organised as per DPM requirements, including the detailed master plan.
The 'Developer' refers to the entity that will be taking the project through into implementation.
Developer
This could be a private sector developer or Musanada.
The brief prepared that brings together the strategic definition of the project with the choice of
Initial Project Brief
appropriate site (which itself is based on the required level of site appraisal).
A stage also known as Stage 2 Preparation and Brief, which involves pre-concept master
Pre-Concept Design
planning and pre-concept building design.
Pre-Concept Master A minimum of three (3) visionary and illustrative master plan design options which demonstrate
Plan the design intent for the site.
Further development of the initial project brief document as the master plan and building
Project Brief
design evolves.
Project Budget The budget for the project agreed with GSEC, up to and including the construction cost.
Schematic Architectural design of buildings during Stage 4: Developed Design Stage. Includes structural
Architecture design and building service systems.
A report prepared by DPM which studies at least three (3) site options, and recommends
Site Options Report
the optional site for development.
A process undertaken by ADHA to review, test and agree to (or otherwise) the site options
Site Validation
report recommendations.
The brief prepared to enable the Strategic Definition of the project. Strategic considerations
Strategic Brief might include initial site considerations, key project outcomes, preliminary planning
parameters, consideration of project type and project programme.
A stage focused on detailed design of infrastructure and buildings. This stage initiates
Technical Design
construction.
Scope of Work. In reference to the stage 2 of the process "Preparation & Brief" it refers to the
SOW
Scope of Work for the design consultant
PLANNING AND DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS VII

1
Introduction
1 Introduction
1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose TECHNICAL STAGES OF WORK
The purpose of the Abu Dhabi National Housing For ease of understanding across different stakeholder
Guidelines Planning and Design Process is to provide a agencies, the process and stages of work have been
robust mechanism to improve the delivery of integrated standardised and aligned with international best practice.
communities for National housing within the Emirate of Abu The Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) Plan of Work
Dhabi. (2013) is used as a model as it clearly aligns the planning
and design process into one framework. This includes five
This report is intended as an internal document for ADHA, stages of work:
the key stakeholders and their appointed consultants. It
includes the process map, supporting descriptions of the 01. Strategic Definition
key stages of work, forms to be completed by relevant 02. Preparation & Brief
stakeholders during key stages of the project, associated
checklists for ADHA to complete and a glossary of terms. 03. Concept Design
1.2 Planning & Design Process 04. Developed Design

The Planning and Design Process organises all master 05. Technical Design
planning and building design tasks required to develop
Five (5) stage gates are introduced to provide a robust
National housing communities into a streamlined workflow.
and auditable process for appropriately timed review
The process is intended to assist with implementation of
and intervention by ADHA into project processes. These
the Abu Dhabi National Housing Guidelines for Integrated
gateways provide clear decision points between the different
Communities. The process provides a clear definition of
stages, and provide assurance to ADHA that the project can
the technical stages of work, identifies timelines, roles and
move to the next stage.
responsibilities of key stakeholders.
It should be noted that Stage 1 primarily applies to the
The process is applicable to technical aspects for the
master planning process. For projects that involve only
delivery of ‘land and loan’, housing, and infill development
the building design, upon identification of the demand, the
projects. Procurement is not documented within the
process will directly lead to preparation of Strategic Brief for
process. For ease of user reference, this document
approval by GSEC.
distinguishes between the process for master planning and
the process for building design.
1 | Strategic definition
WHICH WORKFLOW IS RELEVANT?
Define the project vision and identify the
Figure 1.1 presents the overall Planning and Design Process. best site
This process guides ‘land and loan’ and infill projects
where the master developer is responsible for both master
planning and the delivery of the buildings. 2 | Preparation and brief
Figure 1.2 applies in instances where the master developer Respond to site context through preparation of
pre-concept master plan options
is involved in a ‘land and loan’ or infill project, where there is
no design or delivery of buildings.
Figure 1.3 helps guide individuals, architects and 3 | Concept Design
contractors, involved in the design and delivery of housing
Prepare Concept Master Plan
projects, and design of other buildings (e.g. Mosques,
schools).
4 | Developed Design
Prepare Detailed Master Plan
5 | Technical Design
Detail sustainable infrastructure designs
2 PLANNING AND DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS

Introduction 1
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES This is because:

The Abu Dhabi National Housing Guidelines Planning • The process requires information and analysis to be built in
and Design Process provides a pathway for the shared a systematic way.
and successful delivery of projects to create integrated
communities for Emiratis. The process illustrates the • The stage gateways provide clear decision points against
interrelationships between the key stakeholders through the which changes can be assessed.
five stages of project delivery. The key stakeholders include: • The process has built in ‘change’ mechanisms that will help
manage any changes that occur
• Abu Dhabi Housing Authority (ADHA)
• Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council (DPM) Attachment D in Appendix 1 presents a format for managing
and tracking the changes that occur during the project
• Developers (e.g. Musanada)
lifecycle. Additional new studies/design or validation of
• Municipalities (Abu Dhabi, Al Ain, Western Region) existing studies/design resulting from the change shall be
• Utility agencies (e.g. ADDC, ADSSC) be agreed by the action owner based on the technical stage
• Other agencies (e.g. EAD, ADTCA, DMAT) of work at which the change request is made.
It should also be noted that within each stage, this
document provides a summary overview of the key tasks to
1.3 Structure of Guideline
be undertaken primarily by ADHA. In addition to this, there The remainder of this document is structured into each
is a table within each stage which provides a more detailed stage of the Planning and Design Process. Under each stage:
description of all the tasks and the respective stakeholders • A brief overview of the stage is provided with specifically
responsible. the actions applicable to ADHA highlighted.
ACTIONS • The process diagram for the stage is presented, and where
relevant this is split separately into the master planning
The Abu Dhabi National Housing Guidelines Planning and
process and building design process for clarity.
Design Process flow diagram differentiates between key
actions as follows: • A detailed description of each action is provided. This
includes a description of the tasks, responsibility, time
MASTER BUILDING scale, document flows and supporting notes.
DESCRIPTION GENERAL PLANNING DESIGN • Copies of supporting forms and checklists used to manage
this process.
Process
Documents/
Reports
Decision
Gateway
Recommendations
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
Within any planning or design process potential changes are
inevitable. Evidence from past ADHA projects indicate that
changes in design have had a significant impact on time and
cost of projects.
While the Planning and Design Process will not prevent the
potential need for change, by following a robust process,
with clear gateways, the impact of changes can be better
understood and managed.
PLANNING AND DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS 3

1 Introduction
1.4 Department of Urban Planning and

Municiplaities (DPM) Exemption
In instances where DPM led plans , ADHA NOC and
formal approvals as outlined in the process diagram are not applicable.
However in order to incorporate ADHA’s requirements and identify steps to
minimize the costs of development, a collaborative approach that involves
ADHA’s team input at key gateways identified in the planning and design
process may be adopted as shown below.
ADHA DPM
1. Strategic Site options and

Definition Finalisation of site
appraisal
Pre concept
2. Preparation Identification of Workshop/
and Brief master plan
preferred option meeting
options
3. Concept Input to concept Workshop/ Concept master

Design master plan meeting plan
4. Developed Input to detailed Workshop/ Detailed master

Design master plan meeting plan
Musanada/
Developer
For detailed
5. Technical infrastructure
Design
design

MUNICIPALITIES / UTILITIES / Potential
DPM ADHA DEVELOPER / CONSULTANT
OTHERS Timeline
Master Planning Building Design
1.1 Establish Project Need
1 week
1.2 Strategic Brief
1.3
No Yes
1.4 Identify sites based on Is it an
2030 vision existing
1. Strategic site?
1 month
Definition Engage Municipalities,

1.5 Site Options Report Utility Authorities and other
statutory authorities (like
EAD, ADTCA, DMAT etc.)
1.6 Site Validation and
2 weeks
Selection
1. Strategic Definition
1.7 ADHA
No Approval
of
Strategic
Brief GSEC Project Budget
Approval
1 week + GSEC period
Yes
2.1 Initial Project Brief

2 weeks
Existing Design
P2.2 MP
D2.2
required No New Design D2.3 Pre-Concept Building
Existing
and Choice Design Report (Optioning)
(or) New
of Master
Design
Planner?
DPM Master Plan Yes Developer / Consultant Master Plan
Engage Municipalities,
2. Preparation P2.3 Pre-Concept Master P2.3 Pre-Concept Master Utility Authorities and
Plan Report (Optioning) Plan Report (Optioning) other statutory authorities
& Brief (Pre- (like EAD, ADTCA, DMAT
3 months
etc.)
P2.4 P/D2.4
Concept) Selection Selection No
of of
preferred preferred
option option
Yes
P2.5 Update Initial Project

P2.6 Incorporate
Brief
(DPM Pre-Concept)
2. Preparation & Brief (Pre-Concept)

Consultation with DPM
Development Review/ 2.8 ADHA 2.7 Final Project Brief
Urban Development NOC 1 Consultation with the
Dept GSEC Budget community
4 weeks
Approval (if
variation required)
Existing
D3.2
1 week
Existing
3.1 Initiate Concept Stage
Design New
(or) New?
Master Plan
P3.2
DPM Master Plan Choice Developer / Consultant Master Plan
of Master
# Planner
P3.3 Concept Master Plan P3.3 Concept Master Plan
3 months
3. Concept Report Report
Design
D3.3 Concept Building
Design Report (Optioning)
No
3.4 ADHA
NOC 2
3. Concept Design
2 weeks
Yes
P3.5 DPM Development

No Review & Approval No
2 months
Yes
4.1 Initiate Developed

If changes suggested by Stage
DPM that affect ADHA
1 week
requirement
If no major changes in
CMP submission
P4.2
DPM Master Plan Choice
Developer / Consultant Master Plan
of Master
# Planner
P4.3 Detailed Master Plan P4.3 Detailed Master Plan
Report Report
2 months
4. Developed
D4.2 Schematic Building
Design Design Report
No
4.4 ADHA
NOC 3
1 week
4. Developed Design
Yes

2 months
Yes
5.1 Initiate Technical

requirement D5.2 Detailed Building
Design Report
DMP submission
D5.3
ADHA No
review if
design
change
No
Yes D5.4 Building
4 months
Approval/NOC Yes
5. Technical
P5.2 Concept
Design Infrastructure Planning
Submission No
Yes
P5.3 Preliminary P5.5 Stage review and
Infrastructure Design No approval/NOC from
Submission Municipalities and
5. Technical Design
Yes Utility Providers
P5.4 Detailed
Infrastructure Design No
Submission
Yes
5.7 ADHA
Submission 5.6 Preparation of Tender
to GSEC Documents
2 months
approval GSEC
Construction
PLANNING AND DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS
Budget
Approval
LEGEND Note:
Introduction
Process Documents (reports) Decision Gateway Recommednations # - ADHA NOC and formal approvals will be replaced with collaborative
5
1
meetings if DPM led plans as mentioned in the DPM exemption.

Figure 1.1 Overall Planning & Design Process
6
1
OTHERS Timeline
1 week
Introduction
1.2 Strategic Brief
1.3
No Yes
site? 1 month
1. Strategic 1.5 Site Options Report Utility Authorities and other
Definition 1.6 Site Validation and
2 weeks
Selection
1.7 ADHA
No Approval
of
Strategic
Approval
Yes

2 weeks
Existing Design
P2.2 MP
D2.2
Existing
(or) New
of Master
Design
Planner?
DPM Master Plan Yes Developer Master Plan
P2.3 Pre-Concept Master P2.3 Pre-Concept Master Plan Utility Authorities and
Plan Report (Optioning) Report (Optioning) other statutory authorities
2. Preparation (like EAD, ADTCA, DMAT
3 months
etc.)
P2.4 P/D2.4
& Brief (Pre- Selection Selection No
of of
Concept) preferred preferred
option option
Yes

P2.6 Incorporate
Brief
(DPM Pre-Concept)

Urban Development NOC 1 Consultation with the
4 weeks
Approval (if
variation required)
Existing
D3.2
1 week
Existing
Design New
(or) New?
Master Plan
P3.2
DPM Master Plan Developer Master Plan
Choice
of Master
Planner
#
3 months
Report Report
3. Concept
Design D3.3 Concept Building
No
3.4 ADHA
NOC 2
3. Concept Design
2 weeks
Yes

2 months
Yes

1 week
requirement
CMP submission
DPM Master Plan P4.2

Developer Master Plan
Choice
of Master
Planner
#
Report Report
2 months
4. Developed
Design D4.2 Schematic Building
Design Report
No
4.4 ADHA
NOC 3
1 week
4. Developed Design
Yes

2 months
Yes

Design Report
DMP submission
D5.3
ADHA No
review if
design
change
No
5. Technical Yes D5.4 Building
4 months
Approval/NOC Yes
Design
P5.2 Concept
Infrastructure Planning
Submission No
Yes
5. Technical Design
P5.4 Detailed
Infrastructure Design No
Submission
Yes
5.7 ADHA
for GSEC Documents
2 months
Approval GSEC
Construction
Budget
Approval
LEGEND Note:
Process Documents (reports) Decision Gateway Recommednations
# - ADHA NOC and formal approvals will be replaced with collaborative
Figure 1.2 Master Planning Process
meetings if DPM led plans as mentioned in the DPM exemption.

OTHERS Timeline
1 week
1.2 Strategic Brief
1.3
No Yes
site?
1 month
1. Strategic statutory authorities (like
Definition 1.6 Site Validation and
2 weeks
Selection
1.7 ADHA
No Approval
of
Strategic
Approval
Yes

2 weeks
Existing Design
P2.2 MP
D2.2
Existing
(or) New
of Master
Design
Planner?
DPM Master Plan Yes Developer Master Plan
P2.3 Pre-Concept Master P2.3 Pre-Concept Master Plan
Utility Authorities and other
Plan Report (Optioning) Report (Optioning)
2. Preparation EAD, ADTCA, DMAT etc.)
3 months
P2.4 P/D2.4
& Brief (Pre- Selection Selection No
of of
preferred preferred
Concept) option option
Yes

P2.6 Validation
Brief
(DPM Pre-Concept)

if Master Plan 2.8 ADHA 2.7 Final Project Brief
prepared by NOC 1 Consultation with the
developer GSEC Budget community
4 weeks
Approval (if
variation required)
Existing
D3.2
1 week
Existing
Design New
(or) New?
P3.2
DPM Master Plan Developer Master Plan
Choice
of Master
Planner
Report
3 months
Report
3. Concept
Design D3.3 Concept Building
No
3.4 ADHA
NOC 2
3. Concept Design
2 weeks
Yes
No P3.5 DPM No
Development Review
& Approval
2 months
Yes

1 week
requirement
CMP submission

Choice
of Master
Planner
Report Report
2 months
4. Developed
Design Design Report
No
4.4 ADHA
NOC 3
1 week
4. Developed Design
Yes
No P4.5 DPM Development No

Review & Approval
2 months
Yes

Design Report
DMP submission
D5.3
ADHA No
review if
design
change
No
5. Technical Yes D5.4 Building
4 months
Approval/NOC Yes
Design
P5.2 Concept Infrastructure
Planning Submission No
Yes

Submission Municipalities and Utility
5. Technical Design
Providers
Yes
P5.4 Detailed Infrastructure No

Design Submission
Yes
5.7 ADHA
for GSEC Documents
2 months
Approval GSEC
Construction
Budget
Approval
LEGEND
Introduction
Process Documents (reports) Decision Gateway Recommednations

7
1
Figure 1.3 Building Design Process

1 Introduction

2
Stage 1:
Strategic
Definition
2 Stage 1: Strategic Definition

2.1 Overview
The strategic definition stage is considered a valuable addition to ADHA’s current planning and design process, as it clarifies
the project vision and scope, ‘fixes’ key design criteria (e.g. GFA and FAR), and provides a robust framework for analysing,
testing and selecting the most cost effective and appropriate site for the project. The stage is valuable as it aligns the
project scope, schedule and cost with the vision, goals and budget of ADHA/GSEC and equally applies to the planning or the
design process.
This stage of work primarily applies to the master planning process. For project that involve only the building design, upon
identification of the demand, the process will directly lead to preparation of Strategic Brief for approval by GSEC.
ADHA’s STAGE 1 ACTIONS
1.1 Establish the project need 1.6 Site validation and selection
The starting point for all projects is the Once DPM have identified sites based on 2030
identification of needs according to the supply vision and prepared 1.5 Site options report, based
and demand analysis undertaken by ADHA. on Attachment A: Site Options Appraisal
Request form, ADHA will complete the CH1 Site
Options Validation checklist and Attachment B:
Site Options Evaluation Matrix to help
1.2 Prepare Strategic Brief
determine the optimal site to take forward for
ADHA shall start preparing D1: Strategic Brief development.
Report to provide the DPM basic information
such as the number of units and site area
required and an initial understanding of ADHA’s
vision, objectives and priorities for the project. 1.7 ADHA approval of Strategic
This will help the DPM in 1.5 Preparation of Site Brief
Options. It is expected that any gaps in This is ADHA’s first gateway approval and involves
completing this form by ADHA at this stage, will ‘sign-off’ of the strategic brief and preparation of a
be addressed by ADHA as part of D2: Initial high-level budget for the project, which can initiate
Project Brief. GSEC approval of the project.
At this stage, ADHA is also required to liaise with
developer to receive a high level cost estimate for
1.3 Is it an existing site? the project that can be taken forward to GSEC
If there is an existing site, ADHA has the option approval.
to immediately move to Stage 2. Alternatively,
where there is no site, ADHA shall initiate
the site selection and validation process in
GSEC budget approval
coordination with DPM.
At the end of Stage 1, ADHA will prepare an initial
project budget based on the site condition and
submit for GSEC approval of the project.

2.2 Process Diagram

OTHERS Timeline

1 week
1.2 Strategic Brief
1.3
No Yes
site?
1 month
2 weeks
Selection
1.7 ADHA
No Approval
of
Strategic
Approval
Yes

2 weeks
Existing Design
P2.2 MP
D2.2
Existing
(or) New
of Master
Design
Planner?
UPC Master Plan Yes Developer / Consultant Master Plan

P2.3 Pre-Concept Master P2.3 Pre-Concept Master Utility Authorities and
(like EAD, ADTCA, DMAT
3 months
etc.)
P2.4 P/D2.4
Stage 1: Strategic Definition
Selection Selection No
of of
11
2
preferred preferred
option option
Yes
paration & Brief (Pre-Concept)

P2.6 Incorporate
2.3 Description
Strategic definition is the stage in which the project is identified and strategically defined and appraised before a more detailed brief is
prepared. This stage sets out the core project requirements clearly describing ADHA’s key requirements and aligns these to land
allocations/site identification process.
PROCESS WORKFLOW
NO. PROCESS ACTION DESCRIPTION

Establish the The starting point for all projects is the identification of needs according to the
1.1 Process
Project Need supply and demand analysis undertaken by ADHA.
Based on the above analysis, ADHA will prepare the project's Strategic Brief
which presents the core project information and consideration required for
undertaking the site options and selection process . The main objective of the
Strategic Brief is to focus on what the project needs to achieve rather than
prescribing the potential solutions.
Key information provided will include:

Prepare Strategic • Total land requirement for the project (including community facilities, services
1.2 Report
Brief etc.)
• Feed back from old projects (that influence site selection, key requirement for
site, community feedback etc.), case studies.
• Project goals/project needs, design development and procurement strategy,
project priorities, outline program, stakeholder needs, target budget etc.
• Technical and planning parameters such as number and size of units required,
type of project, planning context, environmental and sustainability strategies to
allow for site section studies shall be carried out by DPM.
In some instances, the project will be development on an already partially
developed site, where the master plan and the infrastructure design are either
already constructed or approved. If this is the case the project should proceed
to Step 1.7 where ADHA's approval is sought.
Is it an existing
1.3 Decision
site? If a new site is required, the Strategic Brief document and a site appraisal
request form is sent to DPM. The site appraisal request form will consist of a
site selection criteria and information request which aims at obtain additional
details to assist during the ADHA site validation process and to prepare for
GSEC queries during the technical project evaluation.
DPM will undertake their internal process to identify potential site(s) to align to
the project requirements. This will be based on internal review of relevant 2030
planning policies, site capacities and consideration of site appropriateness/
readiness for development. Analysis required by ADHA is highlighted by the site
Identify sites based
1.4 Process evaluation checklist (CH1).
on 2030 vision
Engagement of utility and other statutory authorities will be required to get a
commitment so that the project can be serviced during the start of the
operation stage.
DPM will provide ADHA with a consolidated Site Options Report that will
present (i) possible site options, (ii) an initial site physical assessment (based on
available information), (iii) strategic site assessment including infrastructure
availability (iv) an initial development cost of each site, (v) regulatory constraints
Preparation of Site and (vi) recommended site with justification.
1.5 Report
Options
The report will be structured to respond to the ADHA’s CH 1: Site Options
Validation checklist and shall provide all the details requested in Attachment
- A Site Options Appraisal Request Form so that ADHA can answer any queries
arising from GSEC review of the project and its budget.
12
Stage 1: Strategic Definition 2
DOCUMENTS
RESPONSIBILITY TIMESCALE NOTES
TITLE FROM TO
ADHA n/a None n/a n/a
Possible ADHA procurement of term

ADHA 1 week D1: Strategic Brief n/a n/a
consultant to prepare the strategic brief
D1: Strategic Brief
Attachment-A: Site ADHA shall submit the Document D1:

Options Appraisal Strategic Brief and Attachment-A: Site
ADHA n/a ADHA DPM
Request Form Options Appraisal Request Form to guide
the DPM site option report preparation
CH1: Site Options
Validation
DPM None n/a n/a
1 month
It is advisable that more than one site is

identified so that the most appropriate
and cost effective site can be finalised
DPM Site Options Report DPM ADHA
after evaluation process. An initial site
visit is also required to ensure physical
evaluation of the site.
(Cont’d....)

PROCESS WORKFLOW

It is important that the site(s) identified by DPM are validated at an early stage
as site selection will impact cost and programme later on. The aim of the
validation/feasibility study of the site option(s) is two-fold. The first is to identify
the most appropriate site for the project based on the criteria developed in the
site evaluation checklist. This will result in documentation of the development
opportunity for the site. Secondly the evaluation helps in identifying physical
Site Validation and constraints and risks so that these are clearly understood at the start and
1.6 Process
Selection mitigation requirements are built-in to the project development process.
The evaluation will predominantly be a desk top study and will be carried out
based on the information provided by DPM. It may include a site walk-over
visit(s), coordination with the Municipalities over site data and consultation with
the Developer to confirm site conditions and preliminary budget.
The first project gateway is Approval of the Strategic Brief (and associated
high-level budget for the project). The approval decision relates to:
• Project needs and planning parameters
• Site selection
• Preliminary budget
• Project design and procurement strategy, roles and responsibilities (i.e.
master plan by DPM/developer; building design existing/new etc.)
ADHA Approval of • Project timeline
1.7 Gateway
Strategic Brief
Approval of the Strategic Brief and selected site allows the project to proceed
to GSEC for budget approval. On GSEC approval, the Planning and Design
process can progress to Stage 2. Non-approval returns the project back for
re-examination of site options and costs.
All projects (planning and design) must pass through this stage gate
Delegated authority: ADHA Director General

Engage As part of the site identification process, it is recommended that engagement
Municipalities, with the municipalities, utility authorities and other statutory authorities takes
Utility Authorities place so that the project is registered and any immediate local issues can be
and other statutory Recommendation identified. This engagement, driven by ADHA/DPM should provide a cross-
authorities (like check and input into the site validation process and would take the form of a
EAD, ADTCA, DMAT, meeting at which the project is introduced, potential sites discussed and
ADDC etc.) commitments to service the site are made.
14
DOCUMENTS
TITLE FROM TO
CH1: Site Options

Validation
Possible ADHA procurement of site
ADHA 2 weeks n/a n/a appraisal assessment from term
Attachment B: Site
consultants
Options Evaluation
Matrix
This approval forms the basis for

submission of project to GSEC for budget
1 weeks + approval.
GSEC
ADHA None n/a n/a
approval At this stage, ADHA might also require to
timeframe liaison with Musanada to receive a high
level cost estimate for the project that
can be taken forward to GSEC approval.
ALL None n/a n/a

2.4 Forms
Stage 1: Strategic Definition, will be supported by following
reports, forms and checklists
• Document D1: Strategic Brief
• Attachment - A: Site Options Appraisal Request Form
• Checklist CH1: Site Options Validation
• Attachement - B Site Options Evaluation Matrix.
Templates for the above forms are presented in the following
pages.
16
D1: STRATEGIC BRIEF
THIS DOCUMENT IS TO BE COMPLETED BY ADHA (as much as possible) & PROVIDED TO DPM TO GUIDE THE SELECTION OF SITE
OPTIONS
The purpose of the Strategic Brief is to provide an initial outline of the project, its needs, vision and objectives to help inform the
site selection and project initiation processes.
1. PROJECT DETAILS
1.1 Project Title
1.2 Project Ref:
1.3 Type of Project:
1.4. Has site been identified? Yes No

If yes, provide details: If yes, skip to D2 Project Brief D2: Project Brief
2. LAND REQUIREMENT (approximate only)
Unit/plot Area Requirement

Description Number of units Population Comments
size (ha)
2.1 Housing area ADHA to fill in below based on its supply & demand model
Land & infrastructure

Housing
Total land for Housing (ha)
2.2. Community facilities ADHA to fill in below based on community facilities estimate
Mosques (Neighbourhood)
Mosques (Juma)
Community Centres
Nursery
Clinic
Public School
Private School
Police Station
Petrol Station
Sports Centre
Library
Municipal Office
Parks/Opens Spaces
Others
Total land for Community
facilities (ha)
2.3. Infrastructure area ADHA to fill in below based on assumptions
Road ROW area (equal to 20% of the total of 2.1 and 2.2 above) 0
Other services (such as potable water, power, landscape, sewage etc.) - Equal to about
0
10% of the total of 2.1 and 2.2 above
Total land for infrastructure (ha)
Grand Total 0
Note: the information provided above is a high level estimate only. It is the responsibility of the DPM or developer (whichever
is applicable) to test and verify these estimates as part of the master planning process. (Cont’d....)

3. PROJECT VISION AND OBJECTIVES
3.1 Project Description

{provide a description of the project, key priorities for ADHA, any particular standards, guidelines or technologies that ADHA wishes to apply (e.g. 0-carbon)
3.2 Indicative Project Timeline/Programme

(Provide a ghant chart to support the proposed project programme/timescale below)
Phase Year No. units / plots
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 4
Grand Total
3.3 Project Vision and Objectives

(Provide a project vision statement that captures the project aim and the intention)
Performance measures that against which ADHA will assess the pre-
Objectives
concept master plan
3.4 Initial project budget, (if available) AED
4. PROVIDE SITE INFORMATION Attachment A Site Option Appraisal Request Form
{Provide to DPM with Attachment-A Site Options Appraisal Request Form. Attachment A is to be completed by DPMfor each site option identified.
This is required to support the queries of GSEC's technical committee}
5. OTHER INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED
5.1 Lessons form Other Projects:

{Are there any lessons from previous projects to be aware of in designing this project? Including site selection, development timeline, cost etc.}
5.2 Procurement Strategy

{Provide details of the procurement approach relevant to the project such as who is anticipated project partner?, Is it a PPP?, is the master planner DPM
or a developer? Will the development be modular or regular construction?....etc.}
18
ATTACHMENT A: SITE OPTIONS APPRAISAL REQUEST FORM

THIS FORM IS TO BE COMPLETED BY ADHA and DPM AND ATTACHED WITH THE SITE
OPTIONS REPORT
The purpose of the site options appraisal request form is to provide a template for assessing potential sites to meet the
requirements of GSECs technical committee. Fill separate request forms of each of the selected sites.
1. SITE OPTIONS (This section only needs to be completed in one form)
1.1 How many sites are available?

If less than 3, please explain why
1.2 Describe the regional context of the site options

(Provide a plan and supporting written description of the site options strategic context. The plan shows the site options in relation to surrounding land
uses, features and other ADHA projects.)
2. SITE OPTION STUDY (This section is to be completed for each site)
SITE OPTION NO.
2.1 Land Area Available (ha)
2.2 Land Use Zoning

Description of the current 2030 zoning (and proposed, if applicable) of the site and its surrounds. Plan attached as needed.
2.3 Existing Land Use Activities

Explanation of existing land use activities and any structures/buildings/infrastructure on site and identification of any land use constraints (e.g. existing
farming activities on site, or rail corridor impacting site). Should be accompanied by a photo-referenced site plan.
(Cont’d....)

2.4 Surrounding Land Use Activities

Explanation of surrounding land use activities and adjoining structures/buildings/ infrastructure and identification of constraints (e.g. site located next to
undesirable uses such as industry or electricity substation).
2.5 Are there any existing or proposed community

Yes No
facilities near the site?
If yes, please provide details & attach a plan if needed
2.6 Are there any proposed / new developments

Yes No
near the site?
If yes, please provide details & attach a plan if needed
2.7 What is the environmental condition of the site?

(Provide a description of the sites natural condition (vegetation, habitats etc.), describe the level of human disturbance and any evidence of
contamination. Provide photographs of site and a plan if needed.)
2.8 Attach a slope analysis plan showing areas > and < 10% slope.
% of site area (ha)
% of site < 10% slope
% of site > 10% slope
2.9 Are there any geotechnical and

Yes No
hydrogeological risks?
If yes, please describe any constraints requiring mitigation including sabkha, sinkholes, flood plains, high dunes etc. & attach supporting evidence as
needed
2.11 Describe existing and committed roads access options
Please provide details and plan
(Cont’d....)
20
2.12 Is there existing or committed utility infrastructure to support the site? (Supported by letter of communication from the utility authorities
confirming the availability of supply for the site as per project phasing)
Utility Yes/No Please provide details on availability and timing
Power
Potable water
Waste water
Telecom/ICT
Irrigation (TSE)
2.13 What is the approximate developable land area?
Please describe assumptions made for the purpose of

Area Area (ha) % site
providing high level estimates of land areas for deductions
Total site area

Deductions for terrain (e.g.
high dunes, >10% slope)
Deductions for geotechnical
considerations (e.g. sabkha,
flood plain, contaminated
lands)
Deductions for strategic
infrastructure corridors &
security (e.g. critical national
facility boundaries, gas
pipeline, setback for 400kv
powerlines)
Deductions for
environmental buffers (e.g
clusters of ghaf trees,
mangroves, mud flats)
Other deductions as
appropriate
Approximate developable
area (ha)

CH.1 SITE OPTIONS VALIDATION
THIS FORM IS FOR ADHA'S INTERNAL USE AS A CHECKLIST TO ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION ARE PROVIDED IN THE UPC'S SITE
OPTIONS REPORT
The checklist can be attached to D1. Strategic Brief and provided to the DPM to guide preparation of the site options report.
Site selection and validation checklist

A key outcome of Stage 1 (Strategic definition) of the Planning & Design process is the selection of a preferred site to meet ADHA
requirements. Prior to preceding to Stage 2 (Pre-concept master planning), a detailed review and validation of the site options is required.
This checklist helps review and evaluate the site options, and identify a preferred site which is free from major physical constraints and
has infrastructure and utilities readily available.
CH1.1 The Project Description of the Project and the Site Options
CH1.1.1 Project description Confirmation of type of project (e.g. 'land and loan' projects, infill housing projects).
CH1.1.2 Demand profile Table identifying the number of dwellings units / plots required by year.
CH1.1.3 Development statistics Confirmation of the plot size and dimensions & maximum GFA and FAR.
Strategic plan (to scale) showing the location of the site options in relation to surrounding land uses, urban
CH1.1.4 Site options plan
and natural features, and other ADHA projects.
Plans & details for each of the options, which demonstrate they are appropriate (prepared for
CH1.2 Site Details
minimum of 3 sites)
CH1.2.1 Site plan Plans (to scale) which show the dimensions, total site area and access to the sites.
CH1.2.2 Zoning: Plans showing 2030 zoning of the sites.
Explanation and photographic evidence of land use activities, tenants and structures/buildings/
CH1.2.3 Land use & tenure:
infrastructure (utility corridors) on site. Confirmation of any significant land uses constraints.
CH1.3 Site Context Plans & descriptions of the site in its local context (prepared for minimum of 3 sites)
CH1.3.1 Surrounding zoning Plan showing 2030 zoning of surrounding sites.

Explanation and photographic evidence of surrounding land use activities and adjoining
CH1.3.2 Surrounding land uses
structures/buildings/ infrastructure. Confirmation of any non-compatible adjoining land uses.
CH1.3.3 Development proposals: Explanation of all development proposals or projects within 500m of the site.
CH1.3.4 Community facilities: Identification of existing and proposed community facilities within proximity of the site.
Plans & descriptions of the site conditions, including infrastructure availability (prepared for
CH1.4 Site Conditions
minimum of 3 sites)
CH1.4.1 Environmental condition Plan and narrative of the sites habitats, proximity to protected areas and any environmental constraints.
CH1.4.2 Site contamination Description of any land use contamination on site.

CH1.4.3 Slope analysis Topographic plan and analysis of slope.
CH1.4.4 Ground conditions Geotechnical and hydrogeological review of site.
Plan and narrative of available utility infrastructure (both existing and committed) to serve the site (with
CH1.4.5 Infrastructure
communication letter from authorities regarding availability of supply).
Plan and narrative of available transportation infrastructure (both existing and committed) to serve the
CH1.4.6 Transportation
site.
CH1.5 Development Capacity Estimate of the developable site area and No. dwelling units (prepared for minimum of 3 sites)
CH1.5.1 Developable site area: Estimate of developable area of the site (hectares).
CH1.5.2 Total dwellings: Table of estimated capacity of the site (No. of dwelling units).
CH1.5.3 Total GFA: Table of estimated total GFA for the site.
CH1.6 Development Cost High level initial estimate of development costs (prepared for minimum of 3 sites)
Table and plan showing high level estimate of cut/fill requirements based on CH1.4.3 (slope analysis) and
CH1.6.1 Estimate of cut/fill
CH1.4.4 above (ground conditions).
Estimate of site development
CH1.6.2 Table of estimated site development costs including site preparation, roads and infrastructure.
costs
Estimate of building costs (if Table of estimated building costs based on CH1.1.2 and CH1.1.3 (Demand profile & development
CH1.6.3
applicable) statistics) above.
Note: After using this checklist to review the completeness of the DPM Site Options Report, ADHA shall proceed to use Attachment B - Site Option Evaluation Matrix, to help define
the preferred site option. Attachment B should be attached to this form when both completed.

ATTACHMENT B: SITE OPTIONS EVALUATION MATRIX

THIS MATRIX IS TO BE COMPLETED BY ADHA BASED ON THE INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM DPM
ATTACHMENT B: SITE OPTIONS EVALUATION MATRIX

THIS MATRIX IS TO BE COMPLETED BY ADHA BASED ON THE INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM UPC
The site options evaluation matrix is a tool to compare site option score to identify the most appropriate site for the development.
The site options evaluation matrix is a tool to compare site option score to identify the most appropriate site for the development.
Site Option 1 Site Option 2 Site Option 3 Site Option 4
Scale Scores Scores Scores Site Option 1

Scores
Parameter Evaluation Criteria Metric Weighted Average Weighted Average Average Weighted
0 1 2 3 Score Average Score Weighting
Score
Total Score
Score
Weighting
Score
Total Score
Score
Weighting Weighted Score Total Score
Score
Weighting
Score
Total
Vision and Objective Compliance with ADHA Vision Rating (0 -3) 0-50% >50% >75% 100% 1 2 1 2
Compliance with ADHA Objectives Rating (0 -3) 0-50% >50% >75% 100% 2
0
3
3
Scale 3
0
2
0
Scores
Site Suitability Economic activity, residents or tenants to be resettled and/or compensated Rating (0 -3) High Medium Negligible No
Parameter Evaluation Criteria Metric Weighted
Conflict with surrounding uses and activities Rating (0 -3) High Medium Negligible No 2
0
0
1 2 2
3 Score Average Score 3 Weighting Total
Master Planning
Existing or proposed compatible surrounding uses (such as residential, commercial Rating (0 -3) No Low Medium High 3 0 0 0 Score
63% 27%2 37% 50%
Vision and Objective centre)

Compliance with ADHA Vision % deviation >10% 3
1.900 20%
Rating (037%-3)63%
0.127
0-50%
0
0.800
>50%
20% 0.053
>75%
7
7
2 100%
1.1 20% 0.07 1 37%
4
1.5 20% 0.10 50%
Net developable land availability less than ADHA's requirements >5% 3-5% <3%, meets % 50%
0.37 3 0.73 63%0.63 0.50
Compliance with ADHA Objectives or exceeds
Rating (0 -3) 0-50% >50% %>75% 100% 2
Existing Community Facilities Adjacency to health facility Distance - >5km 3-5km <3km 2 0 0 0
SiteAdjacency
Suitability Adjacency to education Economic
facility activity, residents or tenants
Distance to be
- resettled
>5km and/or
3-5km compensated
<3km 2 Rating (0 -3) High
0 Medium Negligible 3 No 0 3
Adjacency to social, religious and commercial facilities Distance - >5km 3-5km <3km 3 0 0 0
Adjacency to open spaces, parks, leisure facilities Distance - >5km 3-5km <3km 1 0 0 1
Infrastructure Network
Conflict with surrounding uses and activities
Existing/ committed key infrastructure (Power, Potable water, Sewage) to site Rating (0 -3) No Poor Adequate Good 1
Rating (0 -3)33% High
0
Medium Negligible 2
No 2 0
Master Planning
Utility
Anticipated capital cost to connect with surrounding infrastructure Rating (0 -3) High Medium Low Marginal 0 33% 1 50% 50% 2 50%50% 2 42%
1.000 25% 0.083 1.500 25% 0.125 1.5 25% 13% 50% 1.250 25% 0.1041667 42%
67% 50% 58%0.58
Existing or proposed compatible surrounding uses (such as residential, commercial
Amount of earthworks required for the development of site Rating (0 -3) High Medium Low Marginal 1
Rating (0 -3) 0.67
No
2
Low Medium0.50 2
High 3 0.50 2
Ease of future phasing- earthwork and utilities. Rating (0 -3) No Limited Adequate Good 2 3 0 1
63%
Transportation network centre)
Existing/ committed road connection to the site Yes / No No - - Yes 2 1 0 0
Access
No. of road accesses to the site Number 0 1 2 <3 2 2.000 25% 0.167
33%
0.67
67%
1 1.000 25% 0.083
33%
0.33 1 1.0 25% 8% 1.900
0.33
33% 2 20%
1.000 25% 0.127
0.0833333 0.33
67% 33% 37%
Net developable land availability less than ADHA's requirements % deviation >10% >5% 3-5%
67%
<3%, meets 3 67%
Other proposed road improvement to the site Rating (0-3) No Studies Planned Committed 2 0.33 1 0.67 2 0.67 1 0.67 63%
Environmental issues Impact of the site development on environmental receptors & biodiversity Rating (0 -3) Severe Significant Moderate Limited 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 or exceeds 1
0.37
Proximity to environmental sensitive and/or protected area Distance - >5km 3-5km <3km
Environment
Is there flood risk on site? Rating (0-3) Severe Significant Limited No 1 0 3 1
Are there any significant natural constraints to be mitigated or avoided (e.g Rating (0-3) Severe Significant Moderate Limited 1 1.167 20% 0.078 1 0.500 20% 0.033 17% 1 1.2 20% 8% 3 1.17 20% 0.0777778
39% 39%
Existing Community Facilities Adjacency to health facility
dunes, natural drainage flow path) Distance61%
39%
39%
- >5km 3-5km
83%
17%
<3km 2 39%
61%
61%
39%
Air quality and noise quality impact to the site from surrounding uses
Rating (0-3) Severe Significant Moderate Limited 1 61% 0 83% 0 61% 1 61%
Adjacency Adjacency to education facility Yes / No
Is there any site contamination No - - Yes 2 Distance 0- >5km 3-5km 1 <3km 2 0
Geotechnical and Are there identified geotechnical risks for the site (e.g. cavities, sabkha)
Rating (0 -3) High Medium Negligible No 2 0 0 2
Adjacency to social, religious andRating
commercial High facilities Distance22%78% - >5km 3-5km
33%
<3km 3
Geo
topographical Are there identified water table risks to be mitigated (0 -3) Medium Negligible No 2 2.333 10% 0.078 78% 1 1.000 10% 0.033
67%
33% 2 1.3 10% 4% 56%
44% 44% 1 1.333 10% 0.0444444 56%
44% 44%
Anticipated capital cost required to overcome the risks Rating (1 -3) Highest Lowest 3 2 2 1
WEIGHTED SCORE Adjacency to open spaces, parks, leisure facilities Distance
22%
- >5km 3-5km
67%
<3km 1 56% 56%
0.53 2.80 0.33 1.60 0.40 2.03 0.41 2.08
Infrastructure Network Existing/ committed key infrastructure (Power, Potable water, Sewage) to site Rating (0 -3) No Poor Adequate Good 1
Utility
Anticipated capital cost to connect with surrounding infrastructure Rating (0 -3) 53.22% High Medium Low 33%33% Marginal 0 40% 41% 33%
33%
40%
47%
46.78%53% 67% 60% 60%1.000 25% 0.083 59%41%
67%
Amount of earthworks required for the development of site Rating (0 -3) High Medium Low
67%
Marginal 1 59%
0.67
Ease of future phasing- earthwork and utilities. Rating (0 -3) No Limited Adequate Good 2
Transportation network Existing/ committed road connection to the site Yes / No No - - Yes 2
Access
33%
No. of road accesses to the site Number 0 1 2 <3 2 2.000 25% 0.167 0.67
67%
Other proposed road improvement to the site Rating (0-3) No Studies Planned Committed 2 0.33
Environmental issues Impact of the site development on environmental receptors & biodiversity Rating (0 -3) Severe Significant Moderate Limited 1
Proximity to environmental sensitive and/or protected area Distance - >5km 3-5km <3km 1
Environment
Is there flood risk on site? Rating (0-3) Severe Significant Limited No 1
Are there any significant natural constraints to be mitigated or avoided (e.g Rating (0-3) Severe Significant Moderate Limited 1 1.167 20% 0.078
39%
39%
dunes, natural drainage flow path) 61%
Air quality and noise quality impact to the site from surrounding uses Rating (0-3) Severe Significant Moderate Limited 1 61%
Is there any site contamination Yes / No No - - Yes 2
Geotechnical and Are there identified geotechnical risks for the site (e.g. cavities, sabkha) Rating (0 -3) High Medium Negligible No 2
22%
Geo
topographical Are there identified water table risks to be mitigated Rating (0 -3) High Medium Negligible No 2 2.333 10% 0.078 78%
78%
Anticipated capital cost required to overcome the risks Rating (1 -3) Highest Lowest 3 22%
WEIGHTED SCORE 0.53 2.80
53.22%

3
Stage 2:
Preparation
and Brief
3 Stage 2: Preparation and Brief

3.1 Overview
This stage of work focusses on preparing a pre-concept master plan and building design that meets ADHA’s requirements
prior to moving to the concept stage.
2.1 Prepare Initial Project Brief On the basis of this review, ADHA is responsible
for selecting the preferred pre-concept master
ADHA shall start filling in D2: Project Brief
plan and building design option to be take forward
to provide the DPM or the developer the key
for concept development in stage 3.
requirements that need to be addressed as part
of the pre-concept design preparation. ADHA
may not be able to complete all information
that is required in the form at this stage. 2.5 Update Initial Project Brief
Notwithstanding, ADHA will provide as much If the pre-concept master plan is not prepared by
information as possible, to provide a basis for the developer, ADHA will work with DPM to
preparation of 2.5 Update initial project brief by update and complete the master planning part of
the developer. the 2.1 Prepare Initial Project Brief. This will be
issued to the developer for incorporation and the
preparation of the cost estimate, which the
developer will include in 2.7 Final Project Brief.
2.2 MP required and Choice of
master planner? The final project brief will become the basis
This decision point provides the option for for design and will include a change control
the pre-concept master plan document to be procedure implemented. Changes or deviations to
prepared by either the DPM or the developer. the final project brief shall only be made with the
This step also initiates Pre-Concept Building agreement of the stakeholders that are potentially
Design if applicable. impacted by the proposed changes.
Impact of the changes on the project timeline and
budget should be evaluated for the project, based
2.4 Selection of preferred option on the design stage of its occurance to estimate
ADHA shall provide a blank copy of CH2: the delay in the overall process.
Pre-concept Design Review checklist to the
developer prior to them preparing the pre-
concept options. This checklist will clearly 2.8 ADHA NOC No. 1
document the criteria against which ADHA NOC 1 is the first elevated authority stage gate
will assess pre-concept design options. For that requires ADHA’s Director General signature.
the master plans prepared by DPM planners, After approval of the Final Project Brief the
collaborative meetings will be organised to project will commence to the concept design
capture ADHA’s requirements in the master plan. stage. Information within the Project Brief shall be
ADHA will use CH2: Pre-concept Design Review used for presentation to GSEC and also as part of
checklist to carry out the assessment of each the community consultation process.
of the pre-concept options prepared by the
developer.
If the developer is also preparing building designs,
GSEC budget approval
ADHA shall use CH7: Building Design Review At the end of Stage 2, a cost estimate that is
Deliverables and Attachment C: Building Space more closely aligned with the project master plan
Design Parameter. to ensure three valid options and building design will be prepared. ADHA may
are prepared. choose to approach GSEC for a revised project
budget approval if found appropriate at this stage.

1.3
No Yes
site?
1 month
2 weeks
Selection
3.2 Process Diagram (Master Planning)
1.7 ADHA
No Approval
of
Strategic
Brief GSEC Project Budget MUNICIPALITIES / UTILITIES / Potential
Approval OTHERS Timeline
Yes Master Planning Building Design
Establish
1.12.1 Initial Project Need
ProjectBrief
Existing Design
2 weeks1 week
1.2 Strategic
P2.2 MP Brief
D2.2
Existing
(or) New
of Master
Design
Planner?
1.3
No Yes
2030 vision DPM Master Plan Yes
existing Developer Master Plan
site?
1 month
Definition
P2.3 Pre-Concept Master P2.3 Pre-Concept Master Plan Engage Municipalities,
Utility Authorities and
Plan Report
1.5 Site (Optioning)
Options Report Report (Optioning) Utility
otherAuthorities and other
statutory authorities
(Pre-Concept)
statutory authorities
(like EAD, ADTCA, DMAT (like
etc.)
P2.41.6 Site Validation and P/D2.4
Strategic
3 months2 weeks
Selection
of of
1. Brief
preferred preferred
option option
1.7 ADHA Yes

No Approval
of
Strategic P2.6 Incorporate
Brief
Brief GSEC Project Budget (DPM Pre-Concept)
Approval
2. Preparation &
Yes
Urban Development 2.1 Initial
NOC Project
1 Brief Consultation with the
2 weeks

4 weeks
Existing Design
Approval (if
variation required)
P2.2 MP
D2.2
Existing
and Choice Note:
(or) New
of Master
Design Existing
Planner?
# - ADHA NOC and formal approvals will be replaced with collaborative
D3.2 meetings if DPM planners prepare the master plan inhouse. This
1 week

Existing exemption does not apply to Consultants appointed by the DPM.
Design New
(or) New?

P2.3 Pre-Concept Master Master Plan P2.3 Pre-Concept Master Utility Authorities and
P3.2 (like EAD, ADTCA, DMAT
UPC Master Plan Developer Master Plan
3 months
Choice etc.)
Stage 2: Preparation and Brief
P2.4 of Master P/D2.4

Selection Planner Selection No
#
of of
& Brief (Pre-Concept)

27
3
preferred preferred
3 months
Report Report
option option
Design
Yes
paration
ncept
3.3 Description (Master Planning)

Preparation & Brief is the stage in which the project is developed into sufficient detail to provide clarity on the design direction and the
overall project budget. This stage articulates the project vision and sets out the core project objectives, quality objectives/aspirations,
intended outcomes and results in the development of a design brief that aligns the budget and the design outcomes. This stage
demonstrates how the site opportunities can be maximised, and constraints and risks are acknowledged and addressed.
PROCESS WORKFLOW
The initial project brief articulates the project vision and translates them into
tangible KPI’s that can be used to evaluate the design outcome. The initial
project brief will combine the outcome of the site validation/ selection
process with the Strategic Brief and forms the key document upon which
the design and its approach will be based.

• Site validation study/ information to assist development of design opportuni-
ties and constraints
• Key decision parameters such as project vision, objectives, quality aspira-
tions, intended outcomes, ADHA’s preferences and principles.
2.1 Initial Project Brief Report
• Key design parameters such as public realm, streetscape, block structures,
zoning, spatial requirements, movement pattern, safety and security,
• Key project planning parameters such as project programme, known risks,
budget, outcomes of initial consultation with authorities, confirmation of
design and procurement strategy/roles and responsibilities
• KPI’s to measure the success of the project and the design
• A project risk assessment and mitigation plan
• ADHA design guidelines and aspects to be incorporated in the design
(design checklists)
• Case studies from the past completed projects that documents the needs of
the end users and to present the design aspirations and structures
Certain projects undertaken by ADHA such as small scale infill projects and
projects within an already master planned area will not require preparation
of a new master plan. In such cases the project will directly proceed to the
MP required and pre-concept architecture decision Step 2.7
P2.2 Choice of Master Decision
Planner If the Initial Project Brief identifies that a masterplan is required for the
project, the next step is to prepare the pre-concept master plan and the
choice is to have the plan prepared either by DPM or the Developer
(Musanada/other private developer).
A pre-concept master plan report covering the following will be prepared:
• the existing context of the site (climatic, urban systems, transport and
utilities);
• site-level design opportunities and constraints; and,
• pre-concept master plan options (minimum three) demonstrating key design
parameters such as land use, urban structure (streets, block structure/
pattern), road layout and project site access arrangements based on initial
trip calculations, open space & community facilities location and connec-
Prepare tions, development orientation, development statistics (GFA/BUA, FAR,
Pre-Concept population density), high-level utility demands, high level development cost
P2.3 Process
Master Plan and three-dimension illustrations/models,
(optioning)
The report will clearly demonstrate how the requirements of the initial
project brief document has been addressed in the master plan.
The step will be undertaken by Developer and the pre-concept options will
be submitted to ADHA for review and section of the preferred option. For
master plan prepared by DPM planners, collaborative meetings will be
organised between DPM and ADHA to capture ADHA’s requirements in the
master plan.
28
Stage 2: Preparation and Brief 3
DOCUMENTS
TITLE FROM TO

consultant to prepare the initial project
brief
The initial project brief will be a key

document to develop the SOW for the
consultants by the Developer as part of
ADHA 2 weeks D2: Project Brief n/a n/a their procurement strategy. In order to
ensure that the key projects
requirements of the project briefs are
covered in the SOW document, it is
mandatory that the developer obtain
ADHA’s approval for the SOW before
issue of consultancy tender to the
market.
ADHA to provide the document D2:

D2: Project Brief
Project Brief (Initial) and the checklist
ADHA n/a DPM/ CH2:Pre-Concept Design Review to the
CH2: Pre-concept ADHA
Developer developer to guide the pre-concept
Design Review
design preparation
For developers the options can be

submitted in the form of a report or
presentation in a format that is agreed
with ADHA based on the project size,
Pre -conce pt master plan Developer ADHA
DPM/ Developer 2 months complexity and scale. The submission
options by the developer
should address all the requirements
that are highlighted in the CH2:
Pre-concept design review
(Cont’d....)

PROCESS WORKFLOW
It is important that the pre-concept optioning process culminate in the

selection of a preferred option by ADHA which can then be used to develop
the concept and the detailed design. ADHA’s approval for the selected
Selection of
P2.4 Decision option will be required before progressing to the preparation of the final
preferred option
project brief and the project budget.
Delegated authority: ADHA Executive Director
In case the pre-concept master plan is prepared by DPM, upon the

identification of the preferred option by ADHA, the initial project brief will be
Update Initial updated to include the outcomes of the pre-concept master plan stage. This
P2.5 Report
Project Brief stage will be carried out to provide a complete pre-concept master plan
package to the developer to be incorporated into the preparation of the final
project brief document and the project budget as part of Step 2.9
Validation is ONLY required in case of a DPM Pre-Concept master plan. Since

the Developer will be responsible for the implementation, it is important
Incorporate(DPM Process they understand the project and the site, and provide confirmation of the pre-
P2.6
Pre-Concept only) concept approach adopted by DPM. The aim is to reduce risk and issues
later in the development programme.
The initial project brief report will be updated with inclusion of the pre-
concept design and the cost estimate for the preferred option. Other section
of the initial project brief report such as the project risk assessment and
mitigation plan, project programme shall be updated considering the
outcomes of the pre-concept design process and the outcomes of the
2.7 Fianl Project Brief Report
authorities consultation.
The project brief shall be frozen at the end of this stage and change control
procedures should be introduced to prevent further changes without
appropriate justifications and authorisation.
NOC 1 is the first elevated authority stage gate that requires ADHA
Executive Director signature. This is the first stage at which project
definition is of sufficient detail for a more robust cost estimate to be
prepared; it is also the end of the stage before the consulting costs on the
project start to increase. The budget approved at this stage should replace
that already highlighted to GSEC and will inform the basis on which the
project goes forward.
Approval relates to:

• Project vision and objectives
• Pre-concept design (Preferred option)
2.8 ADHA NOC 1 Gateway • Updated estimate
• Project timeline
After approval of the Project Brief the project will commence to the concept
development stage. Non-approval returns project back to re-examination of
pre-concept options and costs. All projects (planning and design) must pass
through this stage gate.
If project variations are identified, further GSEC approval is required at this

stage gate.
30
DOCUMENTS
TITLE FROM TO
CH2: Pre-Concept
ADHA 2 weeks ADHA Developer
Design Review
Updating of the initial project brief is an

interim task to ensure that the complete
pre-concept package is given to the
ADHA 1 week D2: Project Brief ADHA Developer developer to inform the final project
brief preparation. This step shall be
skipped based on the project size,
complexity and scale of the project.
Developer 1 week None n/a n/a
Developer 2 weeks D2: Project Brief ADHA Developer
ADHA 2 week L1: NOC Letter ADHA Developer
(Cont’d....)

PROCESS WORKFLOW
As part of the pre-concept design development, it is recommended that

engagement with stakeholders, such as utility and statutory authorities,
takes place so that local issues and commitment from the authorities to
service the development during its operation is obtained. This will act as a
Engage
key to mitigate future project risks associated with availability of various
Municipalities,
infrastructure facilities like power, water, sewer and road connections during
Utility Authorities
the handover of the project to the community.
and other statutory Recommendation
authorities (like
Consultation with community facilities provides such as ADEC, Mosque
EAD, ADTCA, DMAT,
committee, ADM Parks are also encouraged at this stage.
ADDC etc.)
This engagement, will be driven by the developed would take the form of a
meeting at which the project and its demands are introduced and
commitment is sought from the stakeholders.
Consultation with focused community groups, who are identified for

allocation of house/plots in the project is recommended at end of this stage.
Consultation with This is to align the design to the expectations of the end user and to avoid
Recommendation
community the risk of the end product being rejected. The consultation process will be
led by ADHA with support from the developer. Involvement of municipality
and utility authorities is encouraged to explain the surrounding context.
Consultation with DPM Development Review/Urban Development Dept

Consultation with for the preferred option of the pre-concept master plan if the plan is
Recommendation
DPM encouraged to mitigate the risk of delay in the concept and detailed master
plan approval process.
32
DOCUMENTS
TITLE FROM TO
A consolidated stakeholder consultation

matrix and outcome report shall be
prepared and submitted to ADHA. This
Stakholder consultation
Developer n/a Developer ADHA document will be updated regularly and
matrix
used as a tool to follow during the
design stages to follow-up on
stakeholder consultation
The consultation will be supported by

graphic materials, physical models and
mock-ups as required to explain the
project in sufficient detail to the
ALL 2 weeks None n/a n/a community. ADHA in consultation with
the developer will develop the process
and responsibilities of the community
consultation taking into account the
project specific requirements.
ADHA 1 week None n/a n/a

34
1.3
No Yes
site?
1 month
2 weeks
Selection
3.4 Process Diagram (Building Design)
1.7 ADHA
No Approval
of
Strategic MUNICIPALITIES / UTILITIES / Potential
DPM Brief ADHA GSEC Project Budget DEVELOPER / CONSULTANT
Approval OTHERS Timeline
Yes

2 weeks
Existing Design
1 week
1.2 Strategic
P2.2 MP
Brief
D2.2
Existing
(or) New
of Master
Design
Planner?
1.3
No Yes
2030 vision DPM Master Plan Yes
existing Developer Master Plan
site?
1 month
Definition
Site Options Report Utility
UtilityAuthorities
Authorities and other
and other
Plan
1.5 Report (Optioning) Report (Optioning)
(Pre-Concept)
statutory
authorities (like
EAD, ADTCA, DMAT
EAD, ADTCA, DMAT etc.) etc.)
3 months
P2.41.6 Site Validation and P/D2.4
Strategic
Selection Selection
2 weeks
Selection No
of
1.Brief
of
preferred preferred
option option
1.7 ADHA Yes

No Approval
of
P2.5 Update
StrategicInitial Project
P2.6 Validation
Brief
(DPM Pre-Concept)
Approval
2. Preparation &
Yes

2.1 Initial Project Brief Consultation with the
prepared by NOC 1
2 weeks
developer GSEC Budget Existing Design community

4 weeks
Approval (if
variation required)
P2.2 MP
D2.2
Existing
(or) New
of Master
Design Existing
Planner?
D3.2
1 week

Existing
Design New
(or) New?

P3.2 (like EAD, ADTCA, DMAT
3 months
UPC Master Plan Choice etc.)

Stage 2: Preparation and Brief
P2.4 of Master P/D2.4

Selection Planner Selection No
of of

35
3
preferred preferred
Report
3 months
Report option option
Design
Yes
paration
ncept
3.5 Description (Building Design)

Preparation & Brief is the stage in which the project is developed into sufficient detail to provide clarity on the design direction and the
overall project budget. This stage articulates the project vision and sets out the core project objectives, quality objectives/aspirations,
intended outcomes and results in the development of a design brief that aligns the budget and the design outcomes. This stage
demonstrates how the site opportunities can be maximised, and constraints and risks are acknowledged and addressed.
PROCESS WORKFLOW
The initial project brief articulates the project vision and translates them into
tangible KPI’s that can be used to evaluate the design outcome. The initial
project brief will combine the outcome of the site validation/ selection process
with the Strategic Brief and forms the key document upon which the design
and its approach will be based.

• Key decision parameters such as project vision, objectives, quality aspirations,
intended outcomes, ADHA’s preferences and principles.
• Design philosophies for the architectural, structural, MEP and other building
services
2.1 Initial Project Brief Report
• Building language and character definition to reflect the national identity
• Specialist’s requirement
• Future expansion requirements
• Key project planning parameters such as project programme, known risks,
budget, outcomes of initial consultation with authorities, confirmation of design
and procurement strategy/roles and responsibilities
• KPI’s to measure the success of the project and the design
• A project risk assessment and mitigation plan
• ADHA design guidelines and aspects to be incorporated in the design (design
checklists)
• Case studies to show the design aspirations and structures
In terms of building design, there are two potential paths ADHA can take based
on the nature of the project (i.e. fast track or normal process). For example in a
fast track project, considering the quick turn around required in a very limited
Existing (or) New timeframe, it might be possible that an existing housing typologies shall be
D2.2 Decision
Design used for the construction, while in case of a normal project, options shall be
prepared for housing typologies. For the project where use of existing housing
typology is considered the next step will directly proceed to Step 2.7 - Final
Project Brief
For projects that are identified to go through the pre-concept building design, a
pre-concept design report covering options for building spatial allocation and
preliminary layout (minimum three), building massing and elevation character,
privacy considerations (hierarchy/separation of spaces (public/private/
semi-private), overlooking views, orientation etc.), three-dimension illustration/
Pre-Concept
D2.3 Report model, (No Suggestions) intent, regulatory compliance will be prepared. The
Building Design
report will clearly demonstrate how the requirements of the initial project brief
document has been addressed in the master plan.
The pre-concept report will be submitted to ADHA for review and selection of
the preferred option.
36
DOCUMENTS
TITLE FROM TO

consultant to prepare the initial project
brief
The initial project brief will be a key

document to develop the SOW for the
consultants by the Developer as part of
ADHA 2 weeks D2: Project Brief n/a n/a their procurement strategy. In order to
ensure that the key projects
requirements of the project briefs are
covered in the SOW document, it is
mandatory that the developer obtain
ADHA’s approval for the SOW before
issue of consultancy tender to the
market.
ADHA n/a None n/a n/a
The options can be submitted in the form

Pre-concept building
of a report or presentation in a format
design options by the
that is agreed with ADHA based on the
developer
project size, complexity and scale. The
2 month
submission should address all the
Developer (parallel to CH7. Building Design Developer ADHA
requirements that are highlighted in the
MP process) Deliverables
CH2: Pre-concept design review, CH7:
Building design deliverable and
Attatchment C : Building
Attachment C: Building space design
Space Design Parameter
parameter
(Cont’d....)

PROCESS WORKFLOW
It is important that the pre-concept optioning process culminate in the

selection of a preferred option by ADHA which can then be used to develop the
concept and the detailed design. ADHA’s approval for the selected option will
Selection of
D2.4 Decision be required before progressing to the preparation of the final project brief and
preferred option
the project budget.

The initial project brief report will be updated with inclusion of the pre-concept
design and the cost estimate for the preferred option. Other section of the
initial project brief report such as the project risk assessment and mitigation
plan, project programme shall be updated considering the outcomes of the
2.7 Project Brief Report pre-concept design process and the outcomes of the authorities consultation.
The project brief shall be frozen at the end of this stage and change control
procedures should be introduced to prevent further changes without
appropriate justifications and authorisation.
NOC 1 is the first elevated authority stage gate that requires ADHA Executive
Director signature. This is the first stage at which project definition is of
sufficient detail for a more robust cost estimate to be prepared; it is also the
end of the stage before the consulting costs on the project start to increase.
The budget approved at this stage should replace that already highlighted to
GSEC and will inform the basis on which the project goes forward.
Approval relates to:

• Project vision and objectives
• Pre-concept design (Preferred option)
• Updated estimate
2.8 ADHA NOC 1 Gateway
• Project timeline
After approval of the Project Brief the project will commence to the concept
development stage. Non-approval returns project back to re-examination of
pre-concept options and costs. All projects (planning and design) must pass
through this stage gate.
If project variations are identified, further GSEC approval is required at this

stage gate.
38
DOCUMENTS
TITLE FROM TO
CH2: Pre-Concept DPM/

ADHA 2 weeks ADHA
Design Review Developer
Developer 2 weeks D2: Project Brief Developer ADHA
ADHA 2 week L1: NOC Letter ADHA Developer

3.6 Forms
Stage 2: Preparation and Brief, will be supported by
following reports, forms and checklists
• Document D2: Project Brief
• Checklist CH2: Pre-Concept Design Review
• Letter: No Objection Certificate
pages.
40
D2: PROJECT BRIEF
THIS DOCUMENT IS TO BE COMPLETED BY ADHA (AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE) & PROVIDED TO DPM (or) DEVELOPER (as applicable) FOR UPDATE FOR FINAL ADHA APPROVAL
The Project Brief is a more detailed statement for the project that is developed throughout Stage 2. It provides sufficient detail to enable the pre-concept
design stage to progress.
The diagram below explains the process of developing the Project Brief document, and key responsibilities as per the tasks within the planning and design process.
2.1 PREPARE INITIAL 2.5 UPDATE INITIAL 2.9 PROJECT BRIEF 2.10 ADHA NOC No.1
PROJECT BRIEF PROJECT BRIEF The developer updates all ADHA provides final
ADHA initially prepares If DPM prepares the pre- sections of the project approval of project
the project brief & concept master plan, brief below. brief document &
provides this to the DPM ADHA works with the initiates Stage 3.
or developer (as DPM to update section
applicable) as a key 2.0- 5.0 below.
data input for the pre-
concept design
1. PROJECT DETAILS
1.1 Project Title
1.2 Project Ref:
2. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT DATA

{Use information from section 2 of Strategic Brief and any later updates}
Number of Plots/ Size of Plots/

Land Use Site Area (ha) GFA FAR Population Building Height Phasing
units units
2.1 Housing area ADHA or developer to update information based on the selected pre-concept master plan option
Land & infrastructure

Housing
Total land for Housing
(ha)
2.2. Community
ADHA or developer to update information based on the selected pre-concept master plan option
facilities
Mosques (Neighbourhood)
Mosques (Juma)
Community Centres
Nursery
Clinic
Public School
Private School
Police Station
Petrol Station
Sports Centre
Library
Municipal Office
Parks/Opens Spaces
Others
Total land for
community facilities
(ha)
2.3. Infrastructure area ADHA or developer to update information based on the selected pre-concept master plan option
Road ROW
Utilities
Buffers
Total land for
Infrastructure
Grand Total 0
Note: the information provided above is to be verified and updated as part of Stage 3: Concept Design
(Cont’d....)
3. PROJECT VISION AND OBJECTIVES

3.1 Project Description
{provide a description of the project, key priorities for ADHA any particular standards, guidelines or technologies that ADHA wishes to apply (e.g. 0-carbon)
3.2 Project vision & objectives

(Provide project vision statement that captures the project aim and the intention)
Performance measures that against which ADHA will assess the pre-concept master
Objectives
plan
4. THE SITE AND SURROUNDS

{ADHA to complete section 4.0 using Attachment-1 Site Options Appraisal Request Form (as completed by DPM) and the outcomes of CH1 evaluation checklist}
4.1 Land Area Available (ha) ha
4.2 Developable Land Area (ha) ha
4.3 Existing Zoning and Land Use context

Identify any land use constraints that may affect the programme, cost or design of the project (e.g. tenants to be resettled). Explain how these will be addressed / mitigated.
4.4 Surrounding zoning,

Identify any adjacent land use opportunities or constraints that may impact the programme, cost or design of the project (e.g. adjacency to a bachelor housing area, availability of
community facilities nearby). Explain how these will be addressed / mitigated.
4.5 Existing or proposed site access, highway and utility infrastructure

Identify any opportunities or constraints that may impact the programme, cost or design of the project (e.g. can options be developed which are not reliant on high cost investment in
new infrastructure?). Explain how these will be addressed / mitigated.
4.6 Potential geotechnical, topographical and other physical considerations and risks to be addressed
Explain how opportunities and constraints of the site conditions are addressed in the design (e.g flood risk, sand dune mitigation)
(Cont’d....)
42
4.7 Environmental considerations to be addressed

Explain how any important habitats or features are to be preserved or protected (e.g. high dunes, clusters of vegetation), and the approach for land remediation (if applicable).
4.8 Sustainability consideration to be addressed

Describe the Estidama intent for the masterplan project
4.9 Approval requirements and planning consents

Identify whether the Master Plan approval requires the following studies such as TIS and EIA approval, archaeology, hazardous materials etc.
5. MASTER PLANNING TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

ADHA to attach copy of Abu Dhabi National Housing Guidelines for Integrated Community (ADNHG) - Planning summary
Additional design considerations, such as examples below could be included in the section
The intention is to highlight all ADHA, key planning requirements
5.1 Neighbourhood block structure consideration

Describe/illustrate the approach to the design of neighbourhood block layout (eg. plot layout, access, organization of the block)
5.2 Public realm, open space and community facilities location, design and provision considerations
Demonstrate the approach for providing an integrated public realm with accessible community facilities
5.3 Privacy, cultural needs, climatic and orientation considerations

Describe how the masterplan addresses privacy, cultural requirements, climatic and orientation considerations (eg. Sikka, mosque, social considerations)
5.4 Site circulation and access

Describe / illustrate how the internal vehicular and non-vehicular movement system are considered in the master plan to achieve an efficient and safe road network, whilst promoting
accessibility for pedestrians and cyclists.
5.5 Utilities demand and service provision considerations

Describe how the masterplan optimises the provision of utility services (e.g. road layout achieves reduces utility networks costs)
5.6 Provide best practice examples which demonstrate the design intent
(Cont’d....)

6. BUILDING DESIGN TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

ADHA to attach copy of Abu Dhabi National Housing Guidelines for Integrated Community (ADNHG) - Design summary
Additional design considerations, such as examples as shown below could be included in the section
The intention is to highlight all the ADHA, key building design requirements
6.1 Design philosophy

Describe the design philosophies for architectural, structural, MEP and other building services
6.2 Building character and style to reflect the national identity

Describe the approach to the design of key building elements and services with illustration (eg. Architectural language for the building, integration with master plan context)
6.3 Specialist requirements for the project

Document any involvement of specialist consultants for the project (eg. Specialist structural consultant for projects in Sabkha, Acoustic for projects near to high noise area)
6.4 Likelihood of future expansion and flexibility considerations

Explain the future expansion requirements for the buildings (eg future bedrooms, extension of living room)
6.5 Sustainability/Estidama intent for the building

Describe the Estidama intent for the masterplan project
6.6 Provide best practice examples which demonstrate the design intent and aspirations for the project
7. PROJECT RISK REGISTER AND MANAGEMENT
Document all the key risks and their mitigation actions clearly establishing the timeframe for the risk action and the owner of the risk
Owner and Probability Consequence Mitigation
Risk Timeframe for Action Notes/Comments
responsibilities (low/med/hig (L/M/H) Actions
8. PROJECT PROGRAM AND TIMESCALE

{A Gantt chart clearly explaining the major project activities, milestone, tasks, responsibilities and timeframe to be included}
(Cont’d....)
44
9. PROJECT MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

9.1 Roles and responsibilities
Describe the roles and responsibilities of each of the stakeholders involved in the project with contact details
9.2 Communication Plan

Describe the communication channels and the communication responsibilities to be followed in the project (eg. approval requirements, project manager meetings )
9.3 Project deliverables and stages

Reiterate the deliverable requirements and link to the project program
9.4 Project procedures for checking etc.
10. INDICATIVE PROJECT BUDGET (TO BE UPDATED IN THE FINAL PROJECT BRIEF)

CH.2 PRE-CONCEPT DESIGN REVIEW
THIS FORM IS FOR ADHA'S INTERNAL USE AND IS A CHECKLIST TO ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION ARE PROVIDED IN THE DPM/
DEVELOPER PRE-CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT
The form can also be attached with the D2 Project Brief (initial) document to DPM/Developer to guide the pre-concept design report preparation
Pre-concept master plan and/or design review checklist
The purpose of Stage 2 (Preparation and brief) of the Planning & Design Process is to prepare the pre-concept master plan. The pre-concept master plan
illustrates how the sites physical opportunities, constraints and risks have been addressed, articulates the project vision and reflects the values of ADNHG.
CH2.1 Site Details Plans & details for the site, which demonstrate responsiveness to the site context & conditions
Plan & narrative explaining how the site will be developed in relation to surrounding features, land uses and
CH2.1.1 Context plan:
infrastructure (existing and proposed).
Plan & narrative to illustrate how the sites opportunities, constraints & risks will be addressed / or mitigated,
CH2.1.2 Site plan:
including timing of infrastructure availability.
CH2.2 Development Concepts Plans and illustrations of master plan - a minimum of 3 options
Narrative explaining how ADHA's project vision, objectives and design approach such as incorporating
CH2.2.1 Development intent (1 page):
sustainability, privacy, cultural identity, tradition and sense of place are addressed in the master plan.
Initial master plan options (to scale) & supporting 3D illustrations/ sketches which articulate the project vision,
Pre-concept master plan objectives and master planning technical considerations such as neighbourhood block structure, public realm, open
CH2.2.2
options space, community facilities location, privacy, climatic and orientation considerations, responsiveness to site
conditions and cultural needs; as defined by ADNHG.
CH2.2.3 Land use plan: Plan showing all land uses across the site that relates directly to the development statistics. (CH2.2.4)
Table which distinguishes between total site area and developable area; and provides land use types, total GFA and
CH2.2.4 Development statistics:
FAR based on the estimated No. dwelling units. Also provides an estimate of population and population density.
CH2.3 Transportation & Utilities Plans and illustrations of transport & utilities - a minimum of 3 options
Site circulation and access Plan showing site access, key internal road network, vehicular/non-vehicular connection between community
CH2.3.1
plan: facilities and dwellings, access to public transport/school bus etc.
Table showing high level utility demand (power, potable water, waste water & TSE) and narrative to explain the
CH2.3.2 Utility demand calculations:
approach towards sustainability, water and energy conservation.
Pre-Concept Building
CH2.4 Plans and illustrations of typical building typologies - a minimum of three options
Design (if applicable)
A narrative, diagrams and/or sketches describing the project vision and design philosophy for the architectural,
CH2.4.1 Design philosophy
structural, MEP and other service design of the buildings. Demonstrate how ADNHG requirements are incorporated.
Building character and Conceptual illustrations demonstrating the design philosophy and their compliance with the project vision and
CH2.4.2
national identity ADNHG guidelines for national identity, materials and colour palettes.
CH2.4.3 Building statistics summary Plans (to scale) and tables which show GFA, site coverage, FAR and setbacks.
CH2.5 Development Cost Estimate of development costs - for the 3 options

Estimate of site development
CH2.5.1 Table of estimated site development costs including site preparation, roads and infrastructure.
costs:
Estimate of building costs (if
CH2.5.2 Table of estimated building costs based on CH2.2.4 (Development statistics) above.
applicable):
Master Planning Discipline
Building Design Discipline
Note:
1. Refer to CH7: Architectural Deliverables for list of drawings to be completed to support the review of Pre-Concept Building Design
2. Refer to Attachment-C for building design parameters to be completed by the developer
46
<ADDRESSEE>
ADDRESS LINE1
ADDRESS LINE2
ADDRESS LINE3
Abu Dhabi
UAE
No Objection Certificate
<Date>
Project Name:
Reference: No Objection Certificate For [1: Pre-Concept / 2: Concept / 3. Technical] Design Stage
Dear Sirs,
Further to submission of [document reference], this letter is to confirm ADHA has reviewed the details of the
submission and has no objections under the following conditions.
{Insert key conditions}
Development Parameters
{Insert key development parameters}
Gross Floor Area (sqm):
FAR:
No. of Dwellings (units):
Population Density (pers/ha):
SD/-
Director General
Abu Dhabi Housing Authority

48
4
Stage 3: Concept
Design
4 Stage 3: Concept Design

4.1 Overview
The purpose of the concept design stage is to prepare the concept masterplan and the building design in accordance
with ADHA and UPC’s requirements and get approval for the Concept Master Plan from DPM, and (if applicable)
Concept Architectural Design from ADHA.

3.1 Initiate Concept Stage The developer, shall prepare D3.3 Concept
The concept master plan and concept building building design report as per the requirements of
design stage is initiated on the basis of ADHA’s this checklist.
NOC No.1. A letter instruction is provided to the
DPM or the Developer to commence work.
3.4 ADHA NOC No. 2
NOC No. 2 is the second elevated authority
P 3.2 Choice of master planner? stage gate requiring ADHA’s signature. This
Although a pre-concept master plan has already NOC ensures that ADHA’s priorities and vision
been prepared by the developer or the DPM as shown in the pre-concept master plan and
(whichever is applicable), this step is introduced building design are maintained in the concept
design. ADHA’s approval of the concept master
to provide potential for change of the
plan will initiate the master plan submission to the
master planner, such as in the event of a change
DPM for the development review.
of procurement or ‘fast-tracking’ of the project.
P 3.3 Concept Master Plan Report

ADHA will provide the Developer a blank copy of
CH3. Concept Master Plan Review checklist. This
checklist identifies the criteria and documentation
that ADHA will be considering in the review
process, which is additional to UPC’s standard
requirements for master plans.
The developer shall prepare P3.3 Concept master
plan report as per the requirements of this
checklist.
For the master plans prepared by DPM planners,
collaborative meetings will be organised to
capture ADHA’s requirements in the master plan.
D 3.3 Concept Building Design

Report
ADHA will provide the Developer a blank copy
of CH4. Concept Design Review checklist. This
checklist identifies the criteria and documentation
that ADHA will be considering in the review
process. In addition, ADHA will also provide the
designer the requirements of CH7. Building Design
Review Deliverables and Attachment C: Building
Space Design Parameter.

P2.3 Pre-Concept Master P2.3 Pre-Concept Master Plan Utility Authorities and
Plan Report (Optioning) Report (Optioning) other statutory authorities
3 months
etc.)
P2.4 P/D2.4
of of
preferred preferred
option option
Yes

4.2 Process Diagram (Master Planning) P2.6 Incorporate
Brief
(UPC Pre-Concept)
2. Preparation & Brief (Pre-

Consultation with UPC
Urban Development NOC 1 MUNICIPALITIES
Consultation/with the
UTILITIES / Potential
DPM
Dept ADHA GSEC Budget DEVELOPER / CONSULTANT community
4 weeks
OTHERS Timeline
Approval (if
variation required)

Existing
1 week
D3.2
1 week
Existing
1.2 Strategic
3.1 Initiate ConceptBrief
Stage
Design New
(or) New?
Master Plan
1.3
No Yes
1.4 Identify sites basedDPM
on Master Plan IsP3.2
it an Developer Master Plan
Choice
of Master
site?
1 month
Planner
Definition
#
3 months
Report Report Engage Municipalities,
Design
1.6 Site Validation and D3.3 Concept Building
2 weeks
Selection
1. Strategic
No
3.4 ADHA
NOC 2
3. Concept
2 weeks
1.7 ADHA
No Approval
of Yes
Strategic
Approval

No Review & Approval No Yes
Yes 2.1 Initial Project Brief

2 months 2 weeks
Existing Design

P2.2 MP
Note:
If changes suggested by Stage D2.2
UPC that affect ADHA Existing
and Choice Design Report - ADHA NOC
# (Optioning) and formal approvals will be replaced with collaborative
(or) New
1 week
requirement
If no major changes
ofinMaster
Design meetings if DPM planners prepare the master plan inhouse. This exemption does
CMP submission Planner?
not apply to Consultants appointed by the DPM.
Master P4.2
UPC UPC Master
Plan Plan Yes Developer Master Plan
Choice Developer / Consultant Master Plan
of Master
Planner
#
P4.3 Detailed Master Plan P4.3 Detailed Master Plan Engage Municipalities,

P2.3 Pre-Concept
Report Master P2.3 Pre-Concept
Report Master Utility Authorities and
(Pre-Concept)
2 months

3 months
etc.)
Stage 3: Concept Design
P2.4 P/D2.4 D4.2 Schematic Building

Selection Selection No Design Report
of of
& BriefDesign
51
4
preferred No preferred
option 4.4 ADHA option
NOC 3
1 week
Yes
4. Developed
paration
P2.5 Update Yes
Initial Project

In the concept master planning stage the preferred master plan option is developed into a concept design in line with the requirements
of the Project Brief. The concept design will include a number of project strategies such as sustainability strategy, public realm strategy,
open space strategy, community facilities strategy, transportation and utilities strategy etc. to influence the master plan development.
(Note: in parallel the construction and maintenance workflows should also be initiated by ADHA which will focus on development of
aspects such as construction strategy, O&M strategy, H&S strategy and updated project execution plan).
PROCESS WORKFLOW
The concept design stage of the project will be initiated once NOC1 is received
Initiate Concept from ADHA by the Developer (subject to step P3.2 below). The concept stage is
3.1 Process
Stage initiated through the issuing of a Project Request Form to proceed to the next
stage.
Though the decision to use the service of either DPM or the developer for
preparation of the master plan is agreed during “Stage-2: Preparation & Brief”
Choice of Master there might be a requirement to change the earlier decision due to changing
P3.2 Decision
Planner priorities such as sudden need to make the project fast track, or change in
procurement strategy or executive directives. This step is introduced in the
process to allow for these changes and provide flexibility.
A concept master plan report will be prepared at this stage. The report will be
organised as per DPM requirement (DPM Concept Development Review
application requirement), however it will highlight how the design addresses the
requirements of ADHA design guidelines for the National Housing such as
community structure, transport and movement, public realm and community
Concept Master
P3.3 Report facilities.
Plan Report
All statutory requirements related to DPM concept master plan submission such
as consultation with DMAT on the transport study, EAD on EIA study,
consultation with utility authorities shall be completed before submission for
ADHA’s review.
NOC 2 is the second elevated authority stage gate that requires ADHA Project
Directors signature. This is the stage at which the design for the project is
clearly defined and strategies towards construction and implementation start
to emerge. Upon the NOC the master plan will proceed for submission to
DPM development review. The building design stream will proceed towards the
schematic design stage.
Upon receipt of NOC2, the developer will submit the concept Master Plan report
for DPM development review. In cases where the Concept MP is prepared by
UPC Development
P3.5 Process DPM, colloborative meetings between DPM and ADHA will decide if the project
Review & Approval
needs to be submitted to the DPM development review team before
proceeding to the developed/detailed MP stage
52
Stage 3: Concept Design 4
DOCUMENTS
TITLE FROM TO
ADHA shall issue CH3: Concept Master

CH3: Concept Master
ADHA n/a ADHA Developer Plan Review checklist to developer to
Plan Review
guide the preperation of the report
List of drawings and studies within the

concept master plan report will be
Concept Master Plan
Developer 3 months Developer ADHA guided by the DPM submission
Report
requirements to reduce duplicaiton of
information by the developer.
The concept master plan application to

DPM will include the NOC from ADHA
CH3: Concept Master and detailed explanation of ADHA's key
Plan Review requirements and how they are
addressed in the master plan. This is
L1: NOC Letter included in the package to assist DPM
for consideration of ADHA's
requirements during the development
review process.
DPM approval
DPM 2 months DPM Developer
letter issued

4.4 Forms (Master Planning)

Master Planning part of Stage 3: Concept Design will be
supported by following reports, forms and checklists
• Checklist CH3: Concept Master Plan Review
pages.
54
CH.3 CONCEPT MASTER PLAN REVIEW

THIS FORM IS FOR ADHA'S INTERNAL USE AS A CHECKLIST TO ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION ARE PROVIDED IN THE DPM/DEVELOPER CONCEPT
MASTER PLAN REPORT
The form can also be issued to DPM/Developer to guide the concept master plan report preparation
Concept master plan review checklist
The purpose of Stage 3 (Concept Design) of the Planning & Design process is to prepare and get approval for the concept master plan. This checklist is
designed to support the preparation and review of the Concept Master Plan to ensure that ADHA requirements for the planning of integrated and liveable
National Housing communities are met, and focuses on the important criteria for ADHA (albeit mindful of DPM & DMAT requirements)
CH3.1 Site Details Plan & illustrations indicating the development within the context of the surrounding area
CH3.1.1 Affection plan Correct affection plan with accurate geo-referenced coordinates included, consistent with the pre-concept master plan.
CH3.1.2 Context plan Project context and site plans are aligned with ADHA's approved pre-concept master plan and (if applicable) approved concept
CH3.1.3 Site plan building design.
Plans & illustrations that demonstrate the intent, form and design for the master plan and compliance with regulatory
CH3.2 Development Concepts
controls
CH3.2.1 Development intent Development intent reflects ADHA's approved vision and objectives of the master plan agreed to at pre-concept stage.
CH3.2.2 Street level plan

CH3.2.3 Massing plan Plans and illustrations which align with ADHA's approved pre-concept master plan and (if appropriate) ADHA's approved concept
CH3.2.4 Building and site sections building design and support ADNHG.
CH3.2.5 Perspectives
CH3.2.6 Land use plan Plan showing all land uses across the site that relates directly to the development statistics (CH3.2.7).
Demonstrate ADHA requirements have been met as per the agreed pre-concept master plan, by providing total site area; land use,
CH3.2.7 Development statistics
GFA and FAR by type; building heights; % site coverage; % landscaped area; and population.
CH3.3 Development Delivery Indicates the phasing of the development and development management
Phasing plan and phasing summary accurately cross-referenced which specifically meets ADHA phasing requirements by clearly
CH3.3.1 Phasing plan
specifying the timing of delivery of the public realm and community facilities based on forecast population growth.
CH3.3.3 Development M'gmt Development management table aligns with ADHA's approved approach to development delivery, management and maintenance.
CH3.4 Public Realm Describes and illustrates the public realm vision for the development.
CH3.4.1 Plan
Public realm summary, plan, perspectives and sections that meet ADNHG requirements. For instance, sizing of open spaces to
Plan to demonstrate privacy
CH3.4.2 support cultural events (e.g. weddings & Ramadan); demonstrating passive surveillance and consideration of privacy; and providing
considerations
traditional connections and linkages within the master plan (e.g. Meyadeen, Barahaat and Sikkak).
CH3.4.2 Perspectives and sections
CH3.5 Community Facilities Describe how community facilities will be affected and/or required by the development
Narrative and plan of community facilities which demonstrates adherence to ADNHG requirements including provision and design of
CH3.5.1 Summary & plan facilities to meet the specific needs of Nationals (e.g. Neighbourhood Mosques, Juma Mosques, Eid prayer areas, community majilis,
gender separation) and traditional forms of access to the facilities at the neighbourhood level (e.g. sikkah, barahaat etc).
CH3.6 Transportation & Utilities Describe the transportation aspects and infrastructure demands of the development
Site circulation and access Road network and hierarchy plan, integration of land use and transportation network, non vehicular movement systems (such as
CH3.6.1 
plan bicycle, pedestrian) highlighting safe and secure connections to community facilities/ key nodes and road crossings.
Cross sections to illustrate public realm and location of non vehicular movement systems, access to emergency vehicles, public
CH3.6.2 RoW cross-sections 
transport, special vehicles such as school bus, refuse trucks to all part of the master plan, and public parking locations.
Methodology Report for the Transportation Impact Study (TIS), which gives due consideration to the impact of larger private
 vehicles on the ROW design; and additional parking allowances within plots and the public realm, to reflect higher rates of car
ownership and special cultural events (e.g. Ramadan) as per ADNHG requirements.
 Plans and calculations which demonstrate the approach towards sustainability, water and energy conservation; setbacks and
CH3.6.3 Utility demand calculations
screening of utility infrastructure from adjoining properties.
CH3.6.4 Utility plans  Provide evidence of initial utility authorities approval of demand forecast and supply options, clearly specifying the required
commitment and timing of delivery of infrastructure based on the community's forecast growth and development phasing.
CH3.6.5 Utility corridor plans
CH3.7 Development Cost Estimate of development costs at concept level
CH3.7.1 Concept level cost estimate Cost estimate for the site development and master plan/infrastructure development.

<ADDRESSEE>
ADDRESS LINE1
ADDRESS LINE2
ADDRESS LINE3
Abu Dhabi
UAE
<Date>
Project Name:
Dear Sirs,
FAR:
SD/-
Director General
56
Utility Authorities and other
Plan Report (Optioning) Report (Optioning)
3 months
P2.4 P/D2.4
of of
preferred preferred
option option
Yes

P2.6 Validation
Brief
4.5 Process Diagram (Building Design) (UPC Pre-Concept)
2. Preparation & Brief (Pre

Consultation with UPC
prepared by NOC 1 Consultation with the
developer GSEC Budget MUNICIPALITIES / UTILITIES /
community Potential
4 weeks
Approval (if OTHERS Timeline
variation required)

Existing
1 week
D3.2
1 week
Existing
3.1 Initiate Concept
1.2 Strategic Stage
Brief Design New
(or) New?
1.3
P3.2
No Yes
1.4 Identify sites basedDPM
on Master Plan Is it an
Choice
2030 vision ofexisting
Master
site?
Planner
1 month
Definition
Report
3 months
Report
Design
1.6 Site Validation and Design Report (Optioning)
2 weeks
Selection
No
1. Strategic
3.4 ADHA
NOC 2
3. Concept
1.7 ADHA
No Approval
of Yes
Strategic
Approval
No P3.5 DPM No
2 weeks1 week + GSEC period
Development Review
& Approval Yes
Yes
2 months 2 weeks
Existing Design

If changes suggested by P2.2 MP
Stage D2.2
UPC that affect ADHA required No New Design D2.3 Pre-Concept Building
Existing
and Choice
1 week
requirement (or) New Design Report (Optioning)

If no major changes
ofinMaster
CMP submission Planner? Design
UPC Master Plan P4.2

UPC Master Plan ChoiceYes Developer / Consultant Master Plan
of Master
Planner
P4.3 Detailed Master Plan P4.3 Detailed Master Plan Engage Municipalities,

P2.3 Pre-Concept
Report Master P2.3 Pre-Concept
Report Master Utility Authorities and
Plan Report (Optioning)
2 months
Plan Report (Optioning) other statutory authorities
(Pre-Concept)
3 months
etc.)
Stage 3: Concept Design
P2.4 P/D2.4
Selection Selection No Design Report
of of
& BriefDesign
57
4
preferred No preferred
4.4 ADHA
option NOC 3 option
1 week
Yes
4. Developed
Yes
paration

Concept design of buildings would include development of options for the architcture, structural, MEP and other building services to
identify a preferred option for development in future stages of design. It also involve development of a number of project stategies such
as quality outcome, construction technology, sustainability consideration, material definition and finishing schedule. (Note: in parallel
the construction and maintenance workflows should also be initiated by ADHA to start development of related tasks such as
construction strategy, O&M strategy, H&S strategy and updated project execution plan).
PROCESS WORKFLOW
The concept design stage of the project will be initiated once NOC1 is received
Initiate Concept
3.1 Process from ADHA. The concept stage is initiated through the issuing of a Project
Stage
Request Form to proceed to the next stage.
Though the decision to use either an existing building typology or develop new
building typology is agreed during the “Stage-2: Preparation & Brief” there
might be a requirement to change the earlier decision due to changing priorities
such as sudden need to make the project fast track, or change in procurement
Existing Design (or)
D3.2 Decision strategy or executive directives. This step is introduced in the process to allow
New
for these changes and provide flexibility.
For projects where existing building typology is used it will proceed directly to
Step:3.6
For projects that will be continued in the path of developing new building
typologies, a concept architecture report will be prepared at this stage. The
concept architecture report will include a minimum of three options for the
building design. The report will primarily address the requirement of the ADHA
Design Guidelines and will demonstrate how the requirements of the guidelines
are met in the design.
Concept Building
D3.3 Report
Design Report
The report will also include outline proposals for structural design, building
services systems, outline specifications. During this stage a number of initial
strategies that complement the design are prepared. These strategies consider
post-occupancy and operational issues along with the consideration of
buildability such as construction strategy, O&M strategy, sustainability
strategy. Third party consultations are also essential.
NOC 2 is the second elevated authority stage gate that requires ADHA Project
Directors signature. This is the stage at which the design for the project is
clearly defined and strategies towards construction and implementation start
to emerge. Upon the NOC the master plan will proceed for submission to
DPM development review. The building design stream will proceed towards the
schematic design stage.
58
DOCUMENTS
TITLE FROM TO
ADHA shall issue CH4: Concept Building

CH4 : Concept Building
ADHA n/a ADHA Developer Design Review checklist to the developer
Design Review
to guide the preperation of the report
Concept Master Plan

The options can be submitted in the form
Report
of a report or presentation in a format
that is agreed with ADHA based on the
CH7 : Building Design
Developer 3 months Developer ADHA project size, complexity and scale. The
Deliverable
submission should address all the
requirements that are highlighted in the
Attachment C : Building
checklists.
Space Design Parameter
The concept master plan application to

DPM will include the NOC from ADHA
CH4 : Concept Building and detailed explanation of ADHA’s key
Design Review requirements and how they are
addressed in the building design. This is
L1 : NOC Letter included in the package to assist DPM
for consideration of ADHA’s
review process.

4.7 Forms (Building Design)

Building Design part of Stage 3: Concept Design will be
• Checklist CH4: Concept Building Design Review
pages.
60
+
CH.4 CONCEPT BUILDING DESIGN REVIEW
THIS FORM IS FOR ADHA'S INTERNAL USE AS A CHECKLIST TO ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION ARE PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPER's CONCEPT
BUILDING DESIGN REPORT
The form can also be issued to the developer to guide the concept building design report preparation
Concept building design review checklist

A key objective of Stage 3 (Concept Design) of the Planning & Design process is to prepare and get approval for the Concept Building Design. This
checklist is designed to support the preparation and review of the Concept Master Plan to ensure that ADNHG requirements for the planning of
integrated and liveable National Housing communities are met, and focuses on the important criteria for ADHA (albeit mindful of DPM & DMAT
requirements)
Building Placement and Site analysis plan showing building orientation, sun and wind direction, and the relationship between the
CH4.1
Context Analysis building and plot in the design.
Plan to demonstrate the following:
 Villas are oriented to capture prevailing winds (typically from the north/ northwest) to pass between individual
developments and promote cross ventilation.
 Facades are oriented towards the south, east and west should reduce the amount of glazing exposed to direct sun
radiation through smaller openings or increased shading.
CH4.1.1 Site analysis plan  Shaded connection between indoor and outdoor spaces is provided to take advantage
of natural available light and ventilation.
 Villas fronting public streets have a primary entrance and main windows facing the
street.
 Visual privacy between adjacent plots is maintained and overlooking into habitable rooms or outdoor spaces of
neighbouring dwellings is avoided.
Site plan and floor plans detailing the outdoor and indoor spaces and their interlinkages. Future extensions
CH4.2 Site design
should be considered and indicated on the plans.
Plans to demonstrate the following:
CH4.2.1
 Maximum plot coverage and integration of indoor and outdoor spaces is compliant with ADNHG requirements.
 Minimum setbacks on plot comply with ADNHG requirements; and front setbacks are consistent along street
CH4.2.2
Site plan frontages, or in clusters of villas, if possible.
CH4.2.3  Any outbuilding or ancillary structure maintains a minimum setback from the main villa as per ADNHG requirements.
 Any extension or expansion to the original building is built only within the permitted building zone and does not
CH4.2.4
exceed the permissible GFA or prescribed plot coverage.
CH4.2.5 Elevations  Elevation plans to show the maximum allowable building height, as per ADNHG requirements.
Spaces and rooms Site plan and floor plans, FAR, GFA and plot coverage that demonstrate consideration of connectivity between
CH4.3
adjacencies relevant spaces and privacy; the separation of spaces for private, semi-private, semi-public and public use
CH4.3.1  Floors plans and calculation tables (use Attachment C as the template) to show area breakdown and GFA calculations.
CH4.3.2 Diagrammatic layout of the  Floors plans that comply with the universal accessibility code as per ADNHG requirements.
hierarchy of spaces; floor
CH4.3.4 Elevations which show that roofs are a functional part of the design and location for mechanical equipment.
plans and GFA calculation
Diagrams to demonstrate dwellings are designed around four hierarchies of space: Public, Semi-public, Semi-private
table
and Private.
CH4.3.5
 Diagrams to demonstrate that rooms are organized to provide privacy between public and private areas, and between
male and female users.
CH4.3.6 Plans to demonstrate room adjacencies as per the ADNHG.
Plot access, parking and

CH4.4 Site plan highlighting pedestrian access, vehicular access and car parking.
utilities
CH4.4.1  A plan which shows plot access and its relationship with the dwelling design.
CH4.4.2  Table which demonstrates the number of parking spaces meets ADNHG requirements.
Site plan & calculations
 Plan which demonstrates required parking (including space for loading/unloading) is provided in an assigned area and
CH4.4.3
is not visible from, and encroaching into the public realm.
CH4.4.4 Utilities and services  Plan and concept to demonstrate sustainability concepts and conservation of water, electricity and other resources
CH4.5 Development cost Estimate of development costs at concept level

CH4.5.1 Concept level cost estimate  Cost estimate for the building, including all services.
Note:
1. Refer to CH7: Architectural Deliverables for list of drawings to be submitted to support the review of Concept Building Design
2. Refer to Attachment-C for building design parameters to be filled by the developer

<ADDRESSEE>
ADDRESS LINE1
ADDRESS LINE2
ADDRESS LINE3
Abu Dhabi
UAE
<Date>
Project Name:
Dear Sirs,
FAR:
SD/-
Director General
62
5
Stage 4:
Developed
Design
5 Stage 4: Developed Design

5.1 Overview
This stage of work is primarily the responsibility of the DPM or developer (whichever is applicable) in the preparation of
the detailed master plan report as per DPM requirements and the schematic building design report. ADHA plays an
important role in providing approval of the master plan report prior to moving to the technical stage of work.
4.1 Initiate Developed Stage Once

the DPM has provided development approval of
the concept master plan, the developed design
stage can be initiated by ADHA in the form of a
letter instruction to the appointed master planner.
P 4.2 Choice of master planner?

An option for changing master planner is provided
at this stage to provide flexibility, such as in the
event that DPM was the master planner for the
concept stage, but detailed master planning is to
undertaken by the developer.
4.4 ADHA NOC 3

At this stage, ADHA provides final NOC for the
detailed master plan and the schematic building
design report, assuming the developer has met
ADHA’s requirements as per NOC 2.
ADHA shall use CH5. Developed Master Plan
Review (Detailed master plan) and CH6.
Developed Building Design Review (Schematic
building design) to determine whether its
requirements have been met, and it can issue
the NOC. In addition for the building design, the
developer shall provide all required information as
per CH7. Building Design Review Deliverable
and Attachment C: Building Space Design
Parameter prior to ADHA issuing the NOC.

P3.2
Choice
of Master
Planner
#
3 months
Report Report

No
3.4 ADHA
NOC 2
3. Concept Design
2 weeks
Yes
P3.5 UPC Development

No Review & Approval No MUNICIPALITIES / UTILITIES / Potential
2 months
OTHERS Timeline
Yes

1 week
1 week
requirement
1.2 Strategic Brief
CMP submission

Choice
of Master
Planner
1.3
# No Yes
1.4 Identify
P4.3 sites
Detailed Master on
basedPlan Is it an P4.3 Detailed Master Plan
2030 vision
Report existing Report
site?
21months
month
Definition
D4.2 Schematic Building Engage Municipalities,
1.5 Site Options Report Design Report Utility Authorities and other
No EAD, ADTCA, DMAT etc.)
4.4 ADHA
1.6 Site Validation
NOC 3 and
12week
weeks
Selection
1. Strategic Design
4. Developed
Yes
1.7 ADHA
1 week
P4.5 DPM Development No Approval

Review & Approval of
No No
Strategic
2 months

Approval
Yes
+ GSEC period
Yes
2.1 Initial Project Brief Note:

2 weeks
5.1 Initiate Technical Existing Design

If changes suggested by Stage # - ADHA NOC and formal approvals will be replaced with collaborative
UPC that affect ADHA meetings if DPM planners prepare the master plan inhouse. This
requirement P2.2 MP D5.2
exemption Building
Detaileddoes not apply to Consultants appointed by the DPM.
D2.2
required No New Design D2.3Design
Pre-Concept
Report Building
Existing
If no major changes
andinChoice Design Report (Optioning)
DMP submissionof Master (or) New
Design
Planner? D5.3
ADHA No
review if
UPC Master Plan Yes design
change
No
Yes Engage Municipalities,

P2.3 Pre-Concept Master P2.3 Pre-Concept Master D5.4 Building
Utility Authorities and
4 months
Plan Report (Optioning) Plan Report (Optioning) Approval/NOC

other statutory authoritiesYes
(Pre-Concept)
P5.2 Concept
3 months
etc.)
Infrastructure Planning
Stage 4: Developed Design
P2.4 P/D2.4
Submission No
of of Yes
& Brief Design
65
5
preferred preferred
option option P5.3 Preliminary P5.5 Stage review and
Yes Submission Municipalities and
5. Technical
paration
P2.5 Update Initial Project P5.4 Detailed

During this stage, the Concept Design is further developed and, crucially, the design work of the core designers is progressed until the
spatial coordination exercises have been completed. This process may require detailed design and use of different tools, including design
workshops to finalise the design. By the end of this stage all the design would have been checked by the lead designer and signed off so
that no changes shall take place without prior approval.
PROCESS WORKFLOW
The developed design stage will be initiated once NOC is received from DPM for
the concept master plan.
Initiate Developed If the comments received from DPM on the concept master plan impact on the
4.1 Process
Stage ADHA’s key requirements for the design, ADHA will facilitate further discussion
with DPM so that the comments can be resolved without impacting on the
ADHA’s requirements for master planning. Upon successful completion of this
process the developed design stage will be initiated.
Choice of master planner is considered at this stage because there might be an
option that DPM will develop the master plan only till the concept design and it
Choice of Master
P4.2 Decision will be transferred to the developer for further development. The reason for
Planner
this would be due consideration for infrastructure detailing in the master plan
beyond this stage.
A detailed master plan report will be prepared at this stage for submission to
DPM. The report will be organised as per DPM requirement (DPM Detailed
Development Review application requirement), and will also highlight how the
design addresses the requirements of ADHA design guidelines for the National
Detailed Master Housing such as community structure, transport and movement, public realm
P4.3 Report
Plan Report and community facilities.
All statutory requirements related to DPM detailed master plan submission such
as TIS approval from DMAT, EIA approval from EAD, utility authorities approval
shall be completed before submission for ADHA’s review.
The stage gateway is approval of the detailed master plan report. This is the
stage at which the design and strategies towards construction and
implementation is clearly understood. Upon receipt of the NOC, the master
plan will proceed for submission to DPM development review.
Upon ADHA approval the developer will submit the detailed master plan report
for DPM development review. In cases where the Detailed MP is prepared by
UPC Development
P4.5 Process DPM, colloborative meetings between DPM and ADHA will decide if the project
Review & Approval
needs to be submitted to the DPM development review team before proceeding
to the next stage.
66
Stage 4: Developed Design 5
DOCUMENTS
TITLE FROM TO
ADHA shall issue CH5: Developed Master

CH5: Developed Master
ADHA 1 week ADHA DPM Plan Review checklist to developer to
Plan Review
guide the preperation of the report
DPM/
ADHA n/a none ADHA
Developer
List of drawings and studies within the

concept master plan report will be
Detailed master plan
Developer 2 months Developer ADHA guided by the DPM submission
report
requirements to reduce duplicaiton of
information by the developer.
Aim of the review and approval is to

ensure that there are no changes to the
approved concept design.
CH5: Developed Master
The detailed master plan application to
Plan Review
ADHA 1 weeks ADHA Developer DPM will include a detailed explanation
of ADHA’s key requirements and how
L1 : NOC Letter
they are addressed in the master plan.
This is included in the package to assist
DPM for consideration of ADHA’s
review process.
DPM 2 months DPM approval letter issued DPM Developer

5.4 Forms (Master Planning)

Master Planning part of Stage 4: Developed Design will be
• Checklist CH5: Developed Master Plan Review
pages.
68
CH5: DEVELOPED MASTER PLAN REVIEW (Detailed Master Plan)

THIS FORM IS FOR ADHA'S INTERNAL USE AS A CHECKLIST TO ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION ARE PROVIDED IN THE DPM/
DEVELOPER's DETAILED MASTER PLAN REPORT
The form can also be issued to DPM/Developer to guide the detailed master plan report preparation
Developed Master Plan review checklist
The purpose of Stage 4 (Developed Design) of the Planning & Design process is to prepare and get approval for the detailed master plan. This
checklist is designed to support the preparation and review of the detailed master plan to ensure that ADNHG requirements for the planning of
integrated and liveable National Housing communities are met.
CH5.1 Site Details Plan and illustrations which indicate the development within the context of the surrounding area
CH5.1.1 Affection plan Correct affection plan with accurate geo-referenced coordinates included in the concept review application.
CH5.1.2 Context plan Project context and site plans aligned with ADHA's approved concept master plan and (if applicable) ADHA's approved
CH5.1.3 Site plan schematic architecture design.
Plans and supporting Illustrations that demonstrate the detailed design for the development, land use and
CH5.2 Development Design
development statistics
Detailed statement on development intent that continues to reflect ADHA's approved vision and objectives of the
CH5.2.1 Development intent
master plan as agreed at the pre-concept stage.
CH5.2.2 Street level plan
CH5.2.3 Massing plan
All project plans and illustrations align with ADHA's approved concept master plan.
CH5.2.4 Building and site sections
CH5.2.5 Perspectives
Plot specific land use plan showing all land uses across the site that relates directly to the development statistics
CH5.2.6 Land use plan
(CH5.2.7).
Demonstrate ADHA's requirements have been met as per the approved concept master plan, including total site area;
CH5.2.7 Development statistics
land use, GFA and FAR by type; building heights; % site coverage and landscaped area; and population.
CH5.3 Development Delivery Indicate in detail the phasing of the development across the site
The phasing plan and phasing summary are accurately cross-referenced and meet ADHA phasing requirements with
CH5.3.1 Phasing plan respect to the timely delivery of the public realm and provision of community facilities to meet expected growth of the
community.
Development management table and supporting narrative, include detailed breakdown of rates for any service fees
CH5.3.2 Development M'gmt anticipated and land use regulations and community rules to be implemented. Demonstrate alignment with ADHA's
approved approach to development delivery, management and maintenance.
CH5.4 Development Control Master Plan Level Design Regulations & Guidelines
Master plan/precinct design regulations and guidelines compliant with ADNHG requirements for landscaping,
CH5.4.1 Regulations and guidelines
materials, shading, lighting, universal access and signage and wayfinding.
CH5.4.2 Building typology plan Building Typology Plan aligns with ADHA's approved Schematic Architecture Design
CH5.4.3 Plot control regulations Plot context to be developed in line with ADHA approved Concept Master Plan.
CH5.5 Public Realm Describe and illustrate in detail how the public realm concept will be delivered.
CH5.5.1 Plan Public realm summary and all plans to reflect ADHA's approved vision and objectives for public realm agreed to at the
CH5.5.2 Perspectives and sections concept stage.
Describe and illustrate in detail how community facilities will be affected and/or required by the
CH5.6 Community Facilities
development.
Narrative and plan of community facilities which demonstrates adherence to ADHA's requirements as agreed at the
CH5.6.1 Plan
concept stage.
Transportation and (Cont’d....)

CH5.7 Describe in detail the transportation aspects and infrastructure demands of the development
Infrastructure
CH5.7.1 Site circulation and access plan Detailed road network plan, cross sections, non-vehicular movement (cyclists and pedestrians), access to emergency
and special vehicles (e.g. refuse trucks, school buses) and movement plans based on the agreed networks as per of
the concept stage. Demonstrate safety and security of the non-vehicular users.
CH5.7.2 RoW & cross-Sections:
CH5.7.3 Utility demand calculations Detailed plans and calculations demonstrating the approach to sustainability; utility conservation and consumption
efficiency; and safety setbacks from utility infrastructure.
CH5.7.4 Utility plans
PLANNING
Proof of commitment from utility providers that the AND DESIGN
community's IMPLEMENTATION
forecast PROCESS
growth and utility demand is aligned with 69
CH5.7.5 Utility corridor plans committed supply and development phasing.
CH5.4.2 Building typology plan Building Typology Plan aligns with ADHA's approved Schematic Architecture Design
CH5.4.3 Plot control regulations Plot context to be developed in line with ADHA approved Concept Master Plan.

CH5.5 Public Realm Describe and illustrate in detail how the public realm concept will be delivered.
CH5.5.1 Plan Public realm summary and all plans to reflect ADHA's approved vision and objectives for public realm agreed to at the
CH5.5.2 Perspectives and sections concept stage.
Describe and illustrate in detail how community facilities will be affected and/or required by the
CH5.6 Community Facilities
development.
Narrative and plan of community facilities which demonstrates adherence to ADHA's requirements as agreed at the
CH5.6.1 Plan
concept stage.
Transportation and
CH5.7 Describe in detail the transportation aspects and infrastructure demands of the development
Infrastructure
CH5.7.1 Site circulation and access plan Detailed road network plan, cross sections, non-vehicular movement (cyclists and pedestrians), access to emergency
and special vehicles (e.g. refuse trucks, school buses) and movement plans based on the agreed networks as per of
the concept stage. Demonstrate safety and security of the non-vehicular users.
CH5.7.2 RoW & cross-Sections:
CH5.7.3 Utility demand calculations Detailed plans and calculations demonstrating the approach to sustainability; utility conservation and consumption
efficiency; and safety setbacks from utility infrastructure.
CH5.7.4 Utility plans
Proof of commitment from utility providers that the community's forecast growth and utility demand is aligned with
CH5.7.5 Utility corridor plans committed supply and development phasing.
CH5.8 Development Cost Estimate of development costs at developed level
CH5.8.1 Developed level cost estimate Cost estimate for the development and master plan/infrastructure development.
70
Choice
of Master
Planner
Report
3 months
Report

No
3.4 ADHA
NOC 2
3. Concept Design
2 weeks
Yes
No P3.5 UPC No
Development Review
& Approval MUNICIPALITIES / UTILITIES / Potential
2 months
OTHERS Timeline
Yes

11week
week
requirement
CMP submission
1.2 Strategic Brief

Choice
of Master
Planner
1.3
No Yes
P4.3
1.4 Detailed
Identify Master
sites Plan
based on Is it an P4.3 Detailed Master Plan
Report
2030 vision existing Report
site?
2 months
1 month
Design
D4.2 Schematic Building Engage Municipalities,
Design Report Utility Authorities and other
1.5 Site Options Report
No EAD, ADTCA, DMAT etc.)
4.4 ADHA
NOC 3
1 2week
Strategic Definition
weeks
Selection
Developed
4. 1.
Yes
1.7 ADHA
No P4.5 DPM Development No
1 week
No Approval
Review & Approval of
Strategic
2 months

Yes Approval
+ GSEC period
Yes

2 weeks
5.1 Initiate Technical Existing Design

UPC that affect ADHA
P2.2 MP
D2.2
required No New Design D2.3Design
Pre-Concept
Report Building
If no major changes Existing
andinChoice Design Report (Optioning)
DMP submissionof Master (or) New
D5.3 Design
Planner?
ADHA No
review if
UPC Master Plan Yes design
change
No
Yes Engage
D5.4 Municipalities,
Building

P2.3 Pre-Concept Master P2.3 Pre-Concept Master
4 months
Approval/NOC
Utility Authorities and Yes
Design
3 months
P5.2 Concept Infrastructure etc.)

Stage 4: Developed Design
P2.4 P/D2.4 Planning Submission No

of of Yes
71
5
preferred preferred
option P5.3 Preliminary P5.5 Stage review and
option
Yes
5. Technical
Providers
Yes
paration
P2.5 Update Initial Project P5.4 Detailed Infrastructure

During this stage, the Concept Design is further developed and, crucially, the design work of the core designers is progressed until the
spatial coordination exercises have been completed. This process may require detailed design and use of different tools, including design
workshops to finalise the design. By the end of this stage all the design would have been checked by the lead designer and signed off so
that no changes shall take place without prior approval.
PROCESS WORKFLOW
The developed design stage will be initiated once NOC is received from ADHA
for the concept master plan.
Initiate Developed
4.1 Process It will be required that any changes to the concept design during the design
Stage
development process should be communicated to ADHA and resubmited if
required to get the acceptance before proceeding to the next stages of design
development.
Concept building design will be developed to add additional details related to

structural design, building services systems and outline specifications. No
change in spatial layout is envisaged at this stage.
Schematic Building
D4.2 Report
Design Report Project Strategies that were prepared during Stage 3 should be developed
further and in sufficient detail to allow ADHA to sign them off once the lead
designer has checked each strategy and verified that the cost information
incorporates adequate allowances.
The stage gateway is approval of the schematic building design report (and
associated cost estimate) This is the stage at which the design and strategies
towards construction and implementation is clearly understood. Upon receipt
4.4 ADHA NOC 3 Gateway of the NOC,the building design stream will proceed towards the Technical
design stage.
72
DOCUMENTS
TITLE FROM TO
CH6 : Developed
ADHA 1 week ADHA DPM
Building Design Review
Schematic building
design report
CH7 : Building Design

Developer 2 months Deliverable Developer ADHA
Attachment C : Building
Space Design
Parameter
Aim of the review and approval is to

CH6 : Developed
ADHA 1 week ADHA Developer ensure that there are no changes to the
Building Design Review
approved concept design.

5.7 Forms (Building Design)

Building Design part of Stage 4: Developed Design will be
• Checklist CH6: Developed Building Design Review
pages.
74
CH6: DEVELOPED BUILDING DESIGN REVIEW (Schematic Building Design)
THIS FORM IS FOR ADHA'S INTERNAL USE AS A CHECKLIST TO ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION ARE PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPERS
SCHEMATIC BUILDING DESIGN REPORT
The form can also be issued to the developer to guide the schematic building design report preparation
Developed building design review checklist
A key objective of Stage 4 (Developed Design) of the Planning & Design process is to prepare and get approval for the Schematic Architecture
Design. This checklist is designed to support the preparation and review of the Schematic Architectural Plans to ensure that ADNHG
requirements for the planning of integrated and liveable National Housing communities are met.
Site plan and floor plans detailing the outdoor and indoor spaces and their interlinkages. Future
CH6.1 Site Design
extensions should be considered and indicated on the plans.
Floor plans and GFA Floor plans with details of indoor and outdoor spaces demonstrating compliance with approved concept building
CH6.1.1
calculation table design.
 The minimum setbacks, plot coverage including coverage of all buildings comply with the approved concept
CH6.1.2
building design as per ADNHG requirements .
CH6.1.3  All outbuilding or ancillary structures maintain a minimum distance as per ADNHG requirements.
CH6.1.4  Outdoor spaces accommodate a range of outdoor activities.
Site plan
 Outdoor amenities can be accessible throughout the day or night, aided by shade structures
CH6.1.5
or lighting features.
 Planting are used within the setback zone to provide a visual buffer increasing privacy and shading within the plot.
CH6.1.6
The planting palette shall comply with ADNHG requirements.
CH6.1.7 The maximum number of storeys for an outbuilding does not exceed one storey.
Elevations
CH6.1.8 Maximum allowable building height, as per ADNHG.
Spaces and Rooms Site plan and floor plans that demonstrate consideration of connectivity between relevant spaces and
CH6.2
Adjacencies privacy; the separation of spaces for private, semi-private, semi-public and public space spaces.
 Calculation tables and floors plans with space area breakdown and GFA calculation that complies with ADNHG
CH6.2.1
Diagrammatic layout of the minimum spacing requirements.
hierarchy of spaces and floor  Facilities provided in each room comply with the ADNHG requirements (for example, master bed room provided
CH6.2.2
plans with attached bathroom and walk-in-closet).
CH6.2.3  Dwelling design reflects approved design at concept design stage.
CH6.3 Plot Access Site plan and floor plans highlighting pedestrian access, vehicular access and car parking.
CH6.3.1 Plot entrances for various functions (vehicular and non-vehicular) comply with ADNHG requirements.
CH6.3.2 Entrances for driver accommodation is separate, and faces away from the villa.
CH6.3.3 The width of vehicular and non vehicular access complies with ADNHG requirements.
Site plan
CH6.3.4 and floor plans Required parking (including space for loading/unloading) is provided in compliance with ADNHG requirements.
The minimum number of parking spaces and the dimension of the parking space on plot comply with ADNHG
CH6.3.5
requirements.
CH6.3.6
(Cont’d....)

Building Form and Plans, elevations and sections showing the development of the selected design option.
CH6.4
Appearance Detailed 3D renderings of the building show external and internal finishes.
CH6.4.1  A distinction between a visitor entrance and a private entrance to the villa is created.
CH6.4.2
Site plan
CH6.4.3 and Floor Plans  Minimum shading as per ADNHG is provided within the plot.
 Parking facilities inside the plot boundary should have appropriate landscaping, screening and
CH6.4.4
shading, and be suitably integrated into the overall building and site design.
Elevations to show:
CH6.4.5  Shading of south façades is provided to all glazed elements through either a horizontal projection with a width
equal to, or exceeding, the glazed unit, and have a minimum projection of half the window height.
CH6.4.6 Elevations  Shading of east and west façades is provided through appropriate shading systems.
CH6.4.7  Boundary wall height and design comply with ADNHG requirements.
CH6.4.8  Any ancillary building on the boundary wall has a height complying with ADNHG requirements.
CH6.4.9  The scale, texture and colour of the dwellings should reflect the area’s unique character.
Finishes Schedule  The outer surface of the shading elements such as canopies must have a minimum Solar Reflectance Index as
CH6.4.10
required by ADNHG.
Structural and MEP

CH6.5 Schematic drawings and narratives describing structural and MEP considerations in the design
systems
CH6.5.1 Structural GA drawings Show location and size of structural elements, and highlight any elements that may protrude from walls or ceilings.
Describe the building services systems, and strategies in place which are aligned with ADNHG 'Structural and MEP
CH6.5.2 MEP design narrative
Systems' section.
CH6.5.3 MEP layouts Show utility lines within the plot, and demonstrate the locations of utility rooms are compliant with ADNHG.
CH6.6 Development Cost Estimate of development costs at schematic level
CH6.6.1 Concept level cost estimate Cost estimate for the building, including all services.
Note:
1. Refer to CH7: Architectural Deliverables for list of drawings to be submitted to support the review of Concept Building Design
2. Refer to Attachment-C for Building Design Parameters to be completed by the developer
76
6
Stage 5:
Technical
Design
6 Stage 5: Technical Design

6.1 Overview
The technical design stage of work is concerned with developing the infrastructure and the detailed building design. This
stage of work is primarily the responsibility of the developer and includes preparing designs and obtaining approvals/ NOC’s
from the utility providers and the municipality.

5.1 Initiate Technical Stage
4.6 DPM Development Review & Approval
instigates the technical design stage. ADHA shall
provide a letter instruction to the developer to
move to the technical design stage on receipt of
the DPM approval.
D 5.3 ADHA review if design change

ADHA will receive a copy of 5.6 Detailed Building
Design Report only if there is any change in the
building design. This includes changes in the
schematic stage based on the authorities and
municipalities requirements. This step is included
to ensure that key elements of the approved
building design from Stage 4 have not been
modified during the technical design stage. It is
not intended that ADHA will review the technical
specifications of the drawings as this is the
responsibility of the municipality. ADHA will only
review the elements of interest to it as per its
Design Guidelines document.
5.7 ADHA submission for GSEC

approval
ADHA will provide an approval for the tender
document from the developer upon finalisation
and receipt of the approvals/NOC’s from the
relevant stakeholders for the infrastructure and
building design. This approval will initiate the
submission of the tender document to GSEC for
approval and start the construction stage.
GSEC Construction budget approval

At the end of Stage 5, ADHA will submit to GSEC
the project for construction budget approval for
the project.

Choice
of Master
Planner
#
Report Report
2 months
Design Report
No
4.4 ADHA
NOC 3
1 week
4. Developed Design
Yes
P4.5 UPC Development

2 months
Yes OTHERS Timeline

1 week

1.2 Strategic Brief
Design Report
DMP submission
D5.3
ADHA No
1.3
No review
Yes if
design
change
site? No
1 month
Definition
Yes D5.4 Building
4 months
Approval/NOC
Engage Municipalities, Yes
Design
P5.2 Concept statutory authorities (like
Infrastructure Planning EAD, ADTCA, DMAT etc.)
1.6 Site Validation and Submission No
2 weeks
Selection Yes
1. Strategic
5. Technical
1.7 ADHA Yes Utility Providers
No Approval
of P5.4 Detailed
Strategic Infrastructure Design No
Brief GSEC Project Budget Submission
Approval
Yes
Yes
5.7 ADHA
for GSEC Documents
2 months
Approval
2.1 Initial Project Brief GSEC
2 weeks
Construction
Budget Existing Design
Approval
P2.2 MP
D2.2
Existing
(or) New
of Master
Design
Planner?

3 months
etc.)
Stage 5: Technical Design
P2.4 P/D2.4
of of
79
6
preferred preferred
option option
Yes


The stage will focus on further detailed design of the infrastructure and the buildings. By the end of this stage, all aspects of the design
will be completed, apart from minor queries arising from the site during the construction stage.
PROCESS WORKFLOW
The Technical design stage will be initiated once NOC is received from DPM for
the detailed design.
Initiate Technical
5.1 Process
Stage Consultation between ADHA and DPM is recommended if the changes to the
master plan impact ADHA’s key requirements for the design before the start of
the infrastructure design.
Upon DPM approval for the master plan, the data is transferred to the
municipalities to update into their GIS systems. In a master plan context this
consist of two sets of information. 1) the plots and 2) the ROWs and Service
Corridors. After various iterations within the municipality system the PLOTS are
issued as Affection Plans and proceed into the Building Architecture/design
Concept process. The developer of the master plan then proceeds with the infrastructure
Infrastructure planning submission of the ROW’s and Service Corridors with the Municipality
P5.2 Process
Planning Planning Department. This process will demarcate the various easements within
Submission ROWs, utility plots and NOC from the authorities to obtain infrastructure
planning approval to proceed with the preliminary and detailed design of the
infrastructure facilities.
The developer will follow the applicable standards and codes as required by the
respective statutary authorities in the approval process.
Preliminary As part of the approval from the Municipality Planning Department, the plots
P5.3 Infrastructure Process and utility easements/corridors are transferred to the respective external
Design Submission authorities to undergo their design process. Services that are part of
municipality assets such as roads, street lighting, landscape, storm water and
drainage go through the Infrastructure Design Approval process within the
Detailed municipality system.
P5.4 Infrastructure Process
Design Submission Each authority has slightly different approval stages established within their
design work flow for infrastructure design which will be undertaken by the
developer.
Review and
approval/NOC of
The process involves approval for the detailed design/technical design of the
infrastructure
infrastructure networks and plots. An NOC is provided at the end of this stage
P5.5 design by Process
for the design, however a construction permit will be issued only after a
municipalities and
contractor is on board and available to implement the design
respective
authorities
Preparation of Upon obtaining NOC for the infrastructure design and building design the
5.6 Process
Tender Documents developer will proceed to preparation of the construction tender document.
TThe final design level project gateway is the approval of the tender document
which will then proceed to the construction. The approval decision relates to:
- Detailed design of all infrastructure within the master plan (such as but not
limited to roads, utility networks, site preperation)
- Construction, O&M, H&S, procurement, handover strategies
- Project execution plan, program, updated risk assessment
- Updated project budget
ADHA submission
5.7 Gateway Approval of the Technical Design allows the project to proceed to GSEC
for GSEC Approval
approval for the appointment of the contractor and start of construction. On
GSEC approval, the Planning and Design process can progress to construction.
Non-approval returns the project back for re-examination of the design.
All projects (planning and design) must pass through this stage gate.
80
Stage 5: Technical Design 6
DOCUMENTS
TITLE FROM TO
ADHA 1 week None ADHA Developer
Municipality/
Concept Infrastructure
Developer 3 weeks Developer Respective
planning report
authority
Municipality/
Preliminary infrastructure
Developer 1.5 months Developer Respective
design report
authority
Municipality/
Detailed infrastructure
Developer 1.5 months Developer Respective
design report
authority
Municipality/ Municipality/
1 month
Respective NOC letter Respective Developer
(together)
authority authority
Developer 1 months Tender Document Developer ADHA

82
Choice
of Master
Planner
Report Report
2 months
Design Report
No
4.4 ADHA
NOC 3
1 week
4. Developed Design
Yes
No P4.5 UPC Development No

Review & Approval
2 months
Yes OTHERS Timeline

1 week

1.2 Strategic Brief
Design Report
DMP submission
D5.3
ADHA No
1.3
No review
Yes if
design
change
site? No
1 month
Definition
Yes D5.4 Building
4 months
Approval/NOC
Engage Municipalities, Yes
Design
P5.2 Concept Infrastructure EAD, ADTCA, DMAT etc.)
Planning Submission No
2 weeks
Selection Yes
1. Strategic
5. Technical
1.7 ADHA Providers
Yes
No Approval
of
P5.4 Detailed Infrastructure No
Strategic
GSEC Project Budget Design Submission
Brief
Approval
Yes
Yes
5.7 ADHA
for GSEC Documents
2 months
Approval
2.1 Initial Project Brief GSEC
2 weeks
Construction
Budget Existing Design
Approval
P2.2 MP
D2.2
Existing
(or) New
of Master
Design
Planner?

3 months
etc.)
Stage 5: Technical Design
P2.4 P/D2.4
of of
83
6
preferred preferred
option option
Yes


The stage will focus on further detailed design of the infrastructure and the buildings. By the end of this stage, all aspects of the design
will be completed, apart from minor queries arising from the site during the construction stage.
PROCESS WORKFLOW
Initiate Technical The Technical design stage will be initiated once review of the schematic design
5.1 Process
Stage of the building is completed by ADHA
The architectural, building services and structural engineering designs are
further refined to provide technical definition of the project and the design
work of specialist subcontractors is clearly developed and concluded. A design
responsibility matrix is set out to provide the interface requirements between
Detailed Building
D5.2 Report various design teams. By the end, all aspects of the design will be completed
Design Report
apart from minor queries arising from the site during the construction stage.
The developer will follow the applicable standards and codes in coordination
with the respective municipalities building permit department requriements.
ADHA review will be required only if there are any major changes that are
required in the design based on the detailed design/technical design exercise
ADHA Review (if
D5.3 Decision and on the outcome of the discussion with the municipality building approval
any changes)
section. In such cases ADHA will facilitate meetings between the developer and
municipalities (if required) to resolve the issues and obtain approval.
The process involves approval for the detailed design/technical design of the
Building Approval/ building design including Civil Defense requirements. An NOC is provided at the
D5.4 Process
NOC end of this stage for the design, however a construction permit will be issued
only after a contractor is on board and available to implement the design
Preparation of Upon obtaining NOC for the building design the developer will proceed to
5.6 Process
Tender Documents preparation of the construction tender document.
The final design level project gateway is the approval of the tender document
which will then proceed to the construction. The approval decision relates to:
- Detailed design of buildings (including finishes, external works, sustainability
etc.)
- Construction, O&M, H&S, procurement, handover strategies
- Project execution plan, program, updated risk assessment
- Updated project budget
ADHA submission
5.7 Gateway Approval of the Technical Design allows the project to proceed to GSEC
for GSEC Approval
approval for the appointment of the contractor and start of construction. On
GSEC approval, the Planning and Design process can progress to construction.
Non-approval returns the project back for re-examination of the design.
All projects (planning and design) must pass through this stage gate.
84
Stage 5: Technical Design 6
DOCUMENTS
TITLE FROM TO
ADHA 1 week none ADHA Developer
Detailed building design

Developer 1.5 months Developer ADHA
report
ADHA 1 week none ADHA Developer
Municipalities 3 months NOC letter Municipalities Developer
Developer 1 months Tender Documentation Developer ADHA

Appendix 1
Appendix 1

Appendix 1
CH7: BUILDING DESIGN DELIVERABLES
THIS CHECKLIST IS FOR THE DEVELOPER / ARCHITECTS USE ONLY, AND EXPLAINS THE BUILDING DESIGN DRAWING DELIVERABLE REQUIREMENTS
Developed design review checklist
The purpose of the checklist is to provide the list of minimum required drawings by ADHA for the building design at Stages 2, 3 and 4 of the Planning &
Design process, to review and provide approval for the building design.
Stage -2: Preparation and Brief (Pre-concept Building Design - minimum 3 Options)
Deliverables Scale Information Included
N/A Project specific vision.

Pre-concept design narrative N/A Project objectives.
N/A Design philosophy.
Sketches and diagrams articulating the pre-concept design narrative and showing the proposed building image that
Conceptual illustrations N/A
corresponds to the narrative.
Materials and colours palette N/A A selection of colours and materials intended to be used in the project.
Bubble diagrams N/A Identify the main zones and relationships between them.
Plans should be dimensioned and indicate the building setbacks. The GFA calculation table should also indicate the
resultant FAR.
- Site plan of the project showing location of all buildings, roads, parking and landscape elements.
- Plans of all floors showing the room layout and all other details such as furniture layout, dimensions, openings etc. and
explaining how the privacy requirements both at plot level and with the adjacent plots are achieved.
Conceptual floor plans and GFA
1:100 - Elevation of the building showing all the details such as floor levels and overall dimensions.
calculation table
- 3D renderings portraying the building massing, character and identity.
- Future expansion options/
- Interior 3D views of prominent spaces showing indicative interior finishes.
- Room Sizes, GFA and other key planning details/
- Indicative cost estimate/
Stage -3: Concept Design (Concept Building Design)
Concept design narrative N/A Project specific vision.

N/A Project objectives.
N/A Design philosophy.
N/A The development of design from the previous stage.
3D visualizations N/A 3D renderings portraying the building massing, character and identity.
Concept floor plans indicating mandatory planning and design codes requirements applicable to the building type, such
Code analysis 1:100 / 1:200
as:
 Land use restrictions.
 Permissible GFA and FAR.
 Building area limitations, construction classification, occupancy use, including multiple and special usage’s, occupancy
load and egress capacity.
 Means of egress.
 Site accessibility.
 Planning for Estidama documentation.
Key plan or location plan 1:1000 / 1:500
Site analysis 1:200 Solar orientation and prevailing wind direction diagrams.
Site plan 1:200 Site plan of the project showing location of all buildings, roads, parking and landscape elements.
Clear delineation of the project limit lines.
Conformance to zoning restrictions such as setbacks.
Preliminary spot elevations.
Identify number of parking spaces and code/zoning requirements.
Plans of all floors showing structural grid, vertical circulation elements, core elements, vertical shafts, interior partitions,
Floor plans 1:100
door and window locations and floor elevations.
1:100 Must be at a detail level that demonstrates compliance with prevailing building codes and regulations.
1:100 Key dimensions, bay sizes and overall dimensions.
1:100 Room names, tags and areas are noted on each room.
1:100 Accessible routes.
1:100 Meet the requirements of planning authority, i.e. heights.
Elevations
1:100 Indicate elevation of floor levels, key and overall dimensions.
1:100 Show atrium, mezzanine, staircases, immediate road and street levels.
Sections
1:100 Indicative ceiling heights and vertical clearances.
1:200 Drawings highlighting the areas considered in the GFA calculation, based on the DPM definition for GFA calculation.
GFA calculation
N/A Tables listing the areas at each floor and the total areas.
Schedule of rooms areas N/A A list of proposed areas for each room in comparison with the minimum requirements of ADNHG.
Schedule of finishes N/A Preliminary finish schedule for typical areas.
(Cont’d....)
Appendix 1
Stage -4: Developed Design (Schematic Building Design)
Concept design narrative N/A Project specific vision

N/A Project objectives
N/A Design philosophy
N/A The development of design from the previous stage.
3D visualizations N/A 3D views showing the building form and the exterior finishing materials, and landscape.
N/A Interior 3D views of prominent spaces showing the proposed interior finishes.
Close-up views of any prominent architectural elements and spaces such as entrances, courtyards, canopies, shading
N/A
devices.
Provided in the form of concept floor plans, and will include mandatory planning and design codes requirements
Code analysis N/A
applicable to the building type, such as:
N/A  Land use restrictions
N/A  Code footprint
 Identify building area limitations, construction classification, occupancy use, including multiple and special usage’s,
N/A
occupancy load and egress capacity.
N/A  Means of egress.
N/A  Site accessibility.
Key plan or location plan 1:1000 / 1:500
Site plan 1:500 Site plan showing location of all buildings, roads, parking and landscape elements.
 Clear delineation of the project limit lines.
 Conformance to zoning restrictions for easements and setbacks, etc.
 Spot elevations.
 Identify number of parking spaces and code/zoning requirements.
 Provisions for waste management.
 Existing and proposed utilities documented.
 Site drainage, storm water removal or detention documented.
1:200 Hard and soft landscape layout.
Landscape plan and details
1:20 Details of features, pergolas, gazebos, tents, water features, swimming pools etc.
 Plans of all floors showing structural grid, vertical circulation elements, core elements, vertical shafts, interior partitions,
Floor plans 1:100
door and window locations and floor elevations.
 Details should demonstrate compliance with prevailing building codes and regulations.
 Key dimensions, bay sizes and overall dimensions.
 Plan indicating major extent of materials and any special conditions or equipment.
 Room names, tags and areas are noted on each room.
 Accessible routes.
 Proposed structural system.
 MEP design considerations; services rooms requirements and locations of equipment.
Elevations 1:100  Meet the requirements of planning authority, i.e. heights.
 Indicate elevation of floor levels, key and overall dimensions.
 Indicate materials of the building exterior.
Sections 1:100  Show atrium, mezzanine, staircases, immediate road and street levels.
 Indicate ceiling heights and vertical clearances.
 Indicate the build up materials of walls, floor and roof slabs.
 Show any equipment on the roof and height and distances from parapets.
Plans and sections showing the number of steps on each flight, dimensions of risers and threads, handrails and guardrails
Staircase Details 1:50
details (scale 1:10).
Vehicular, Pedestrian and Accessible
1:200 Plans and sections showing the width, gradient of ramps and the details of railing, where provided.
Ramps Details
Specialists Details 1:20 / 1:50 Typical wall sections, canopies, shading devices, cladding/screening systems, skylights, waterproofing systems etc.
Schedule and Elevations of Doors and
1:20 Door/window types, material, Ironmongery and fire rating.
Windows
Schedule of Finishes N/A Identifying finishes of each room.
Outline Specifications N/A Identify specification sections and major building material systems and finishes.
Schedule of Rooms Areas N/A A list of proposed areas for each room in comparison with the minimum requirements of the ADNHG.
Estidama Documentation N/A See Estidama Pearl Rating System manual for villas.

Appendix 1
ATTACHMENT C: BUILDING SPACE DESIGN PARAMETER

THIS FORM IS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DEVELOPER & PROVIDED TO ADHA FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL
This form compares the areas provided for different rooms and spaces in comparison with ADHA minimum requirements. This form also
documents the estimated utilities loads and car parking spaces.
This form can be used at each stage of the design process.
1. PROJECT DETAILS
1.1 Project Title
1.2 Project Ref:
2. GROSS FLOOR AREA BREAKDOWN
Proposed Proposed Proposed Minimum Required

Occupancy Category Room Name
Length (m) Width (m) Area (m2) Area (m2)
Residential Spaces Majlis (Male) 42
Majlis (Female) 27
Living room 27
Dining Room 25
Powder Room 3.2
Toilet - 1 4
Toilet - 2 4
Guest Bedroom 20
Kitchen 25
Kitchenette 12
Store Room 5
Laundry Room 9
Master Bedroom 30
Standard Bedroom - 1 20
Staff Bedroom - 1 9
Staff Bedroom - 2 9
Master Bathroom 6.4
Standard Bathroom - 1 4.8
(Cont’d....)

1.1 Project Title
1.2 Project Ref:
Appendix 1
2. GROSS FLOOR AREA BREAKDOWN
Proposed Proposed Proposed Minimum Required

Occupancy Category Room Name
Length (m) Width (m) Area (m2) Area (m2)
Residential Spaces
Residential Spaces Standard
Majlis Bathroom - 2
(Male) 4.8
42
Standard
Majlis Bathroom - 3
(Female) 4.8
27
Standard
Living Bathroom - 4
room 4.8
27
Staff Bathroom
Dining Room - 1 3
25
Staff Bathroom
Powder Room - 2 3
3.2
Master- 1Walk-in Closet

Toilet 5
4
Standard
Toilet - 2 Walk-in Closet - 1 4
Standard
Guest Walk-in Closet - 2
Bedroom 4
20
Standard Walk-in Closet - 3

Kitchen 4
25
Standard Walk-in Closet - 4

Kitchenette 4
12
Balconies
Store Room N/A
5
with depths of 1.5 or more
Laundry Room N/A

9
Master Bedroom N/A

30
Additional Spaces
(If Applicable) Standard Bedroom - 1 N/A
20
Standard Bedroom - 2 N/A

20
StaircasesBedroom - 3
Standard N/A
20
Circulation
Corridors
Staff Bedroom - 1 N/A
9
Structure WallsBedroom
Staff and Columns
-2 N/A
9
Building Services
Master Bathroom
Electrical, Mechanical, Telecome Rooms 6.4
N/A
(Excluded from GFA)
Proposed GFA
Standard Bathroom - 1 0 4.8
(Current Phase)
Future Extension GFA
TOTAL GFA 0
Note: the information provided above is to be verified and updated as part of Stage 4: Developed Design
3. SERVICES
3.1 Electrical Loads (kW) kW
3.2 Potable Water Demad (m2/day) m2/day
3.3 Waste Water Load (m2/day) m2/day
3.4 Required Number of Car Parking 3.5 Provided Number of Car Parking
Spaces Spaces

Appendix 1 2
Attachment D Change (Scope / Variations) Log
Project Name:
Project Number:
Update Date:
Affected
Change Owner & Instruction Affected studies to be verified Contract value
ID Change to be Actioned Request date Primary Change Secondary Change Cause / Impact Action Owner Due Date Priority Contract clause / Status
Ref. or reviewed impact
scope
ADHA Utility / infrastructure design & demand

1 Increase in the GFA of units xxxxxx Building design Cause: Request by GSCEC
Ref No.xxxxx calculations
Closed: change
Impact 1 : Delay in project Project implemenation plan ADHA High AED 0.00
approved
Impact 2: Re-design of buildings

Pre-concept; concept and Musanada /
LY
High AED 0.00
Closed: change
N
detailed building design Consultant rejected
O
LE
Concept & detailed master Musanada /
Impact 3 : Re-design of infrastructure High AED 0.00 Open: under review
P
plan reports Consultant
Musanada /
AM
EX
Impact 4: Authorities consultation na High AED 0.00 Open: under review
Consultant
Impact 5: etc Low AED 0.00 Open: under review
10
11
12
13
14
15

2 Appendix 1

Implementation Guidelines - Final 08112017 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Implementation Guidelines - Final 08112017 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PLANNING

2 Stage 1: Strategic Definition 10

3 Stage 2: Preparation and Brief 26

4 Stage 3: Concept Design 50

5 Stage 4: Developed Design 64

6 Stage 5: Technical Design 78

PLANNING AND DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS VII

1.2 Planning & Design Process 04. Developed Design

Prepare Detailed Master Plan

Detail sustainable infrastructure designs

2 PLANNING AND DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES This is because:

PLANNING AND DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS 3

1.4 Department of Urban Planning and

1. Strategic Site options and

3. Concept Input to concept Workshop/ Concept master

4. Developed Input to detailed Workshop/ Detailed master

4 PLANNING AND DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS

Master Planning Building Design

1.1 Establish Project Need

Definition Engage Municipalities,

2.1 Initial Project Brief

DPM Master Plan Yes Developer / Consultant Master Plan

P2.5 Update Initial Project

2. Preparation & Brief (Pre-Concept)

3. Concept Report Report

P3.5 DPM Development

4.1 Initiate Developed

P4.5 DPM Development

5.1 Initiate Technical

Yes Utility Providers

meetings if DPM led plans as mentioned in the DPM exemption.

Master Planning Building Design

1.1 Establish Project Need

1.2 Strategic Brief

PLANNING AND DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS

DPM Master Plan Yes Developer Master Plan

P2.5 Update Initial Project

2. Preparation & Brief (Pre-Concept)

P3.5 DPM Development

4.1 Initiate Developed

DPM Master Plan P4.2

P4.5 DPM Development

5.1 Initiate Technical

Yes Utility Providers

meetings if DPM led plans as mentioned in the DPM exemption.

Master Planning Building Design

1.1 Establish Project Need

2.1 Initial Project Brief

DPM Master Plan Yes Developer Master Plan

P2.5 Update Initial Project

2. Preparation & Brief (Pre-Concept)

4.1 Initiate Developed

DPM Master Plan P4.2

No P4.5 DPM Development No

5.1 Initiate Technical

P5.3 Preliminary P5.5 Stage review and

P5.4 Detailed Infrastructure No

Process Documents (reports) Decision Gateway Recommednations

Figure 1.3 Building Design Process

This page intentionally left blank

8 PLANNING AND DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS

2 Stage 1: Strategic Definition 10

3 Stage 2: Preparation and Brief 26

4 Stage 3: Concept Design 50

5 Stage 4: Developed Design 64

6 Stage 5: Technical Design 78