Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A:ACEP 疗法Dr.Sher
A:ACEP 疗法Dr.Sher
It is well established that women are born with all the eggs occurs in waves. Because the outcome of meiosis is not deter-
they will ever have. That these eggs are arrested in prophase mined until fertilization, if even some of these inactive
I of meiosis and must ultimately reduce their chromosome follicles can be presumed genetically normal, then women
number by half before fertilization can occur is not generally with a history of aneuploid eggs could potentially still
as well appreciated (1). As eggs age, nondisjunctional events produce genetically normal ones in a subsequent cycle.
at the time of ovulation occur more frequently (2–4). This
The most prevalent approaches for treating poor-prognosis
risk becomes so significant that women over the age of 35
patients at present are the short protocol, also known as the
years are routinely offered screening to detect fetal aneu-
microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist
ploidy. Nondisjunctional events at the first meiotic division
‘‘flare’’ (7, 8), and the GnRH antagonist protocol (9–12).
are the most common cause of first trimester miscarriage
Neither of these protocols has been especially effective in
(3) as well as the most common cause of failure of assisted
improving ART outcomes in these patients (13–15). The
reproduction techniques (ART) (4).
initial flare of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in the short
Embryos that are morphologically abnormal are almost protocol may be promoting follicular development, but the
always aneuploid, although many embryos appearing normal luteinizing hormone (LH) flare that occurs with it may be si-
on day 3 (>7 cells, <20% fragmentation) or day 5 are still multaneously promoting apoptosis (14). In a similar fashion,
genetically abnormal (5–6). Because most genetic errors oc- the standard antagonist protocol exposes the maturing
cur at ovulation, manipulation of the hormonal environment oocytes to the patient’s own endogenous androgen produc-
surrounding the oocyte before ovulation may increase the tion during the 6 to 7 days of stimulation before development
chance of that oocyte completing meiosis normally. Primary of a mature follicle (13). Even low levels of androgen could
follicles are metabolically inactive, and follicular growth be significant in patients who are overly sensitive.
We present a novel approach to treating patients with prior
Received June 6, 2006; revised and accepted March 2, 2007.
poor response to ovarian stimulation based on the intrinsic
Reprint requests: Jeffrey D. Fisch, M.D., Sher Institute for Reproductive
Medicine, Las Vegas, 3121 S. Maryland Parkway, Suite 300, Las Vegas, physiology and biochemistry of the ovary. Using a hypothesis
NV 89109 (FAX: 702-892-9666; E-mail: jfisch@sherinstitute.com). of androgen oversensitivity (as opposed to the androgen
342 Fertility and Sterility Vol. 89, No. 2, February 2008 0015-0282/08/$34.00
Copyright ª2008 American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Published by Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.004
overproduction commonly seen in association with anovula- sis. Those with unexplained failure had a presenting diagno-
tion), we developed a protocol promoting estrogen domi- sis of male factor infertility or tubal occlusion. Every patient
nance in the ovary. Using GnRH agonist/antagonist in this cohort had been counseled by her prior physician to
conversion with estrogen priming (AACEP), we have been pursue oocyte donation and that further treatment with her
able to achieve success in women failing the short protocol own eggs would be futile.
or the standard GnRH antagonist approach.
Since 2002, we have used this AACEP protocol in our Ovarian Stimulation
poorest prognosis patients and have seen improvement in
All patients were pretreated with estrogen/progestin oral con-
egg quality compared with their prior response with other
traceptive pills for 1 to 3 weeks. The GnRH agonist (Lupron
standard protocols for poor responders. In 2004 we reported
0.5 mg/day; TAP Pharmaceuticals, Lake Forest, IL) was
results of a small randomized, controlled trial evaluating this
started in a standard long protocol, overlapping the last 5 to
protocol (16). We achieved a 43% ongoing pregnancy rate in
7 days of oral contraceptive. The GnRH agonist was stopped
the AACEP group, all of whom had been given a little chance
with the onset of menses and replaced by low-dose (0.125
of ever conceiving with their own eggs. Since 2003 the AA-
mg/day) GnRH antagonist on cycle day 2.
CEP has been our standard approach for poor responders.
This work further describes our experience with the AACEP Estradiol valerate, 2 mg, was given intramuscularly every
protocol among a large cohort of women with poor prognosis 3 days for two doses. Estrogen suppositories were used to
who were not ready to consider oocyte donation. maintain the endometrium until at least one follicle measured
15 mm. Follicular development was then stimulated using re-
combinant FSH in initial doses of 600 or 750 IU/day, decreas-
MATERIALS AND METHODS ing to 225 IU/day after 5 days. After the first 2 days, hMG at
Patients 75 IU/day was substituted for the 75 IU/day of recombinant
Between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2006, 137 FSH. Transvaginal ultrasound monitoring began after 7
women aged %42 years with prior IVF failure and poor days of stimulation. The average patient needed 13 days of
quality embryos were treated using their own eggs with an stimulation before hCG administration. No cases of over-
AACEP protocol at our center by a single physician. All stimulation occurred. Ovulation was triggered using hCG
patients in this analysis had only their first AACEP treatment when at least one follicle was 18 mm and half of the remain-
cycle included. Characteristics of the population are shown in der were 15 mm. Oocytes were recovered transvaginally
Table 1. Every patient was found to be a poor responder to using ultrasound guidance 34.5 hours after trigger.
stimulation, with all transferred embryos in prior attempts
<7 cells or >20% fragmentation on day 3. In addition to
previous IVF failure, every patient in this cohort had an addi- Embryo Culture
tional diagnosis of either advanced maternal age (R41 years; Metaphase II (MII) oocytes were fertilized using intracyto-
n ¼ 26), decreased ovarian reserve (AFC <5; n ¼ 7), elevated plasmic sperm injection (ICSI) 4 to 6 hours after retrieval
levels of FSH (>9.0 mIU/mL; n ¼ 40), endometriosis (stage in all cases. Embryos were cultured individually in 50-mL
III–IV; n ¼ 12), or unexplained poor response to stimulation droplets of early cleavage medium (ECM) (Sage BioPharma,
(<6 mature follicles; n ¼ 52). Several patients, especially Pasadena, CA) under oil at 37 C in a 5% CO2, 5% O2, 90%
those with advanced maternal age, had more than one diagno- N2 environment. All embryos were serially evaluated over
TABLE 1
Characteristics 137 low responding women aged %42 with prior IVF failure using agonist/antagonist
conversion with estrogen priming.
Characteristic n Ongoing gestation n (%)
Patents treated 137 37 (27.0)
Mean prior IVF attempts (SD) 1.9 (1.3)
Diagnosis
Unexplained poor response 52 15 (28.9)
(<6 mature follicles)
Elevated FSH (R9.0 mIU/mL) 40 14 (35.0)
Advanced maternal age (R41 years) 26 5 (19.2)
Endometriosis (stage III–IV) 12 2 (16.7)
Decreased ovarian reserve (AFC <5) 7 1 (14.3)
Fisch. Agonist/antagonist conversion. Fertil Steril 2008.
344 Fisch et al. Agonist/antagonist conversion Vol. 89, No. 2, February 2008
TABLE 2
Characteristics and ART cycle outcomes of 137 fresh embryo transfers into low responding women
aged %42 with prior IVF failure using agonist/antagonist conversion with estrogen priming.
<38 38–42
Characteristic Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Embryo transfer cycles (n) 63 74
FSH dosage: 600 IU/day (n) 41 31
750 IU/day (n) 22 43
Age (years) 33.6 (2.8) 39.6 (1.2)
Previous IVF failures 2.1 (1.2) 1.8 (1.3)
Peak estradiol (pg/mL) 1179 (667) 1105 (810)
Endometrial thickness (mm) 11.8 (2.1) 11.8 (2.0)
Metaphase II oocytes 6.9 (5.2)a 5.3 (3.7)
Fertilized embryos 5.4 (4.0)a 4.1 (2.9)
Embryos transferred 2.6 (1.1) 2.6 (1.1)
Pregnancy rate 44% (28/63) 51% (38/74)
Ongoing gestation rate 25% (16/63) 28% (21/74)
Implantation rate (sacs/ET) 18% (29/165) 18% (36/196)
a
P< .05 compared with age 38 to 42.
Fisch. Agonist/antagonist conversion. Fertil Steril 2008.
activity (31). Exposure to LH is also reported to down-regu- levels. Oversuppression from the pill has been a potential
late the formation of connexin gap junctions between granu- concern, but because its actions are central, direct ovarian
losa cells (32) and close existing channels necessary for stimulation with exogenous FSH should overcome any
coordinated follicular development (33). issues.
Pretreatment with estrogen/progestin oral contraceptive The GnRH agonist was retained in this protocol to take ad-
pill is important to establishing an estrogenic environ- vantage of the FSH/LH ‘‘flare’’ effect occurring in the artifi-
ment. The dual actions of progestin-mediated LH suppres- cial luteal phase of oral contraceptive pretreatment, where it
sion and estrogen-mediated stimulation of sex hormone– may augment follicular recruitment. However, GnRH recep-
binding globulin result in decreased follicular androgen tors have been identified in the ovary, and, due to its relatively
TABLE 3
Characteristics and ART outcomes of 137 fresh embryo transfers stratified by FSH dosage into low
responding women aged %42 with prior IVF failure using agonist/antagonist conversion with estrogen
priming.
600 750
FSH dosage (IU/day) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Embryo transfer cycles (n) 72 65
Age (years) 36.1 (3.6)a 37.6 (3.5)
Previous IVF 1.8 (1.1) 2.1 (1.5)
Peak estradiol (pg/mL) 1197 (738) 1096 (753)
Endometrium (mm) 11.8 (2.1) 11.7 (1.9)
Mature oocytes 7.2 (4.7)b 4.7 (3.9)
Fertilized embryos 5.7 (3.8)b 3.5 (2.7)
Embryos transferred 2.8 (1.1) 2.5 (1.1)
Pregnancy rate 49% (35/72) 48% (31/65)
Ongoing gestation rate 29% (21/72) 25% (16/65)
Implantation rate (sacs/ET) 21% (41/200) 15% (24/161)
a
P< .02 compared with 750 IU/day.
b
P< .002 compared with 750 IU/day.
Fisch. Agonist/antagonist conversion. Fertil Steril 2008.
346 Fisch et al. Agonist/antagonist conversion Vol. 89, No. 2, February 2008
hormone antagonist on day 1 as compared to day 6 of the stimulation: 27. Kowalik A, Barmat L, Damariao M, Lui HC, Davis O, Rosenwaks Z.
effect on hormonal levels and follicular development in in vitro fertiliza- Ovarian estradiol production in vivo. Inhibitory effects of leuprolide ac-
tion cycles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:5632–7. etate. J Reprod Med 1998;43:413–7.
14. Kolibianakis EM, Albano C, Kahn J, Camus M, Tournaye H, Van 28. Schachter M, Friedler S, Raziel A, Strassburger D, Bern O, Ron-el R.
Steirteghem AC, et al. Exposure to high levels luteinizing hormone Improvement of IVF outcome in poor responders by discontinuation of
and estradiol in the early follicular phase of gonadotropin releasing hor- GnRH analogue during the gonadotropin stimulation phase—a function
mone antagonist cycles is associated with a reduced chance of pregnancy. of improved embryo quality. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001;18:197–204.
Fertil Steril 2003;79:873–80. 29. Land JA, Yarmolinskaya MI, Dumoulin JC, Evers JL. High-dose human
15. Kolibianakis EM, Albano C, Camus M, Tournaye H, Van Steirteghem AC, menopausal gonadotropin stimulation in poor responders does not
Devroey P. Relationship between LH and oestradiol in IVF cycles before improve in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1996;65:961–5.
GnRH antagonist initiation. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;7:190–3. 30. Fanchin R, Castelo-Branco A, Kadoch I, Hosny G, Bagirova M,
16. Fisch JD, Sher G, Keskintepe L. A randomized, controlled trial of low Frydman R. Premenstrual administration of gonadotropin-releasing
dose GnRH antagonist started on day 2 in poor responders undergoing hormone antagonist coordinates early antral follicle sizes and sets up
stimulation with luteal phase GnRH agonist, estrogen priming and the basis for an innovative concept of controlled ovarian hyperstimula-
high-dose FSH. Oral presentation at the 59th Annual meeting of the tion concept. Fertil Steril 2004;81:1554–9.
American Society for Reproductive Medicine, San Antonio, Texas, 31. Fanchin R, Schonauer LM, Cunha-Filho JS, Mendez-Lozano DH. Coor-
October 11–15, 2003. dination of antral follicle growth: basis for innovative concepts of
17. Fisch JD, Sher G, Rodriguez H, Overby G, Adamowicz M, Keskintepe L. controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Semin Reprod 2005;23:354–62.
Graduated embryo score (GES) is superior to day-3 morphologic criteria 32. Tilly JL, Kowalski KI, Schomberg DW, Hsueh AJ. Apoptosis in atretic
alone for predicting ART outcome. Fertil Steril 2003;80:1352–8. ovarian follicles is associated with selected decreases in messenger
18. Keskintepe L, Fisch JD, Adamowicz M, Zody R, Sher G. Transferring ribonucleic acid transcripts for gonadotropin receptors and cytochrome
embryos to blastocyst medium 46 hrs post ICSI in preparation for day P450 aromatase. Endocrinology 1992;131:1670–6.
3 embryo transfer, improves implantation and pregnancy potential. 33. Hsueh AJW, Eisenhauer K, Chun SY, Hsu SY, Billing H. Gonadal cell
Poster presentation at the 59th annual meeting of the American Soci- apoptosis. Recent Prog Horm Res 1996;51:433–55.
ety for Reproductive Medicine; San Antonio, Texas; October 11–15, 34. Andersen CY. Characteristics of human follicular fluid associated with
2003. successful conception after in vitro fertilization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
19. Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology 1993;77:1227–34.
and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines for the 35. McNatty KP, Makris A, Reinhold VN, DeGrazia C, Osathanondh R,
number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril 2004;84(Suppl 1):S1–2. Ryan KJ. Metabolism of androstenedione by human ovarian tissues in
20. McNatty KP, Makris A, DeGrazia C, Osathanondh R, Ryan KJ. The vitro with particular reference to reductase and aromatase activity.
production of progesterone, androgens and estrogens by granulosa cells, Steroids 1979;34:429–43.
thecal tissue and stromal tissue from human ovaries in vitro. J Clin 36. Hiller SG, Van den Boogard AMJ, Reichert LE, Van Hall EV. Intraovar-
Endocrinol Metab 1979;49:687–99. ian sex steroid hormone interactions and the regulation of follicular
21. McNatty KP, Makris A, DeGraziak C, Osathanondh R, Ryan KJ. maturation: aromatization of androgens by human granulosa cells in
Steroidogenesis by recombined follicular cells from human ovary in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1980;50:640–7.
vitro. J Clin Endorinol Metab 1980;51:1286–92. 37. Ackert CL, Gittens JE, O’Brien MJ, Eppig JJ, Kidder GM. Intracellular
22. Greisen S, Ledet T, Ovesen P. Effects of androstenedione, insulin and communication via connexin43 gap junctions is required for ovarian
luteinizing hormone on steroidogenesis in human granulosa luteal cells. folliculogenesis in the mouse. Dev Biol 2001;233:258–70.
Hum Reprod 2001;16:2061–5. 38. Antagon (ganirelix acetate) injection package insert. West Orange, NJ:
23. Zelinski-Wooten MB, Hutchinson JS, Hess DL, Wolf DP, Stouffer RL. Organon USA, May 2004.
Follicle stimulating hormone alone supports follicle growth and oocyte 39. Granot I, Dekel N. The ovarian gap junction protein connexin43: regula-
development in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist-treated tion by gonadotropins. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2002;13:310–3.
monkeys. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1658–66. 40. McNatty KP, Smith DM, Makris A, DeGuzia C, Tulchinsky D,
24. Erickson GF, Magoffin DA, Dyer CA, Hofeditz C. The ovarian androgen Osathanondh R, et al. The intraovarian sites of androgen and estrogen
producing cell: a review of structure/function relationships. Endocr Rev formation in women with normal and hyperandrogenic ovaries as judged
1985;6:371–99. by in vitro experiments. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1980;50:755–63.
25. Chabab A, Hedon B, Arnal F, Diafouka F, Bressot N, Flandre O, et al. 41. Clark JR, Dierscke DJ, Wolf RC. Hormonal regulation of ovarian
Follicular steroids in relation to oocyte development in human ovarian folliculogenesis in rhesus monkeys. III. Atresia of the preovulatory
stimulation protocols. Hum Reprod 1986;1:449–54. follicle induced by exogenous steroids and subsequent follicular
26. The European Recombinant Human LH Study Group. Recombinant development. Biol Reprod 1981;25:332–41.
human luteinizing hormone (LH) to support recombinant human 42. Fanchin R, Cunha-Filho JS, Schonauer LM, Kadoch IJ, Cohen-Bacri P,
follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)-induced follicular development in Frydman R. Coordination of early antral follicles by luteal estradiol
LH- and FSH-deficient anovulatory women: a dose finding study. administration provides a basis for alternative controlled ovarian
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:1507. hyperstimulation regimens. Fertil Steril 2003;79:316–21.