A Review of Basic Aerodynamics 04.21.2020 (Handouts) PDF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 15

04/21/2020

Airfoil Nomenclature

Upper Surface
Leading Main Camber Line Trailing
A Review of Basic  Edge Edge

Aerodynamics Thickness
Chord Line Camber
Lower Surface

04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 1 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 2

1 2

Airfoil Nomenclature Symmetric Airfoil


Maximum Thickness 1 : Location of Maximum Thickness Chord Line
Leading 2 : Location of Maximum Camber
Edge
Radius
Maximum Camber
Chord Line equal to Main Camber Line
Leading 1
Edge 2
Chord c
Trailing
Edge
Main Camber Line
Trailing Edge Angle
Chord c
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 3 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 4

3 4
04/21/2020

Airfoil Nomenclature Ideal Fluid Flow about an Airfoil


• Leading Edge = Forward edge of the airfoil.

• Trailing Edge = Aft edge of the airfoil.

• Chord = Line connecting the leading and trailing edge.


Denotes the length of the airfoil.
• Mean Camber Line = Line drawn half way between the
upper and lower surface of the airfoil. Denotes the amount
of curvature of the wing.
• Point of Maximum Thickness = Thickest part of the
wing expressed as a percentage of the chord.

04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 5 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 6

5 6

Aerodynamic Forces on an Airfoil Aerodynamic Forces on an Airfoil


 
N
Chord Line R Chord Line L R

   D
M M A

V V
Resultant aerodynamic force R and moment M on the body. Resultant aerodynamic force and the components into which it splits.
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 7 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 8

7 8
04/21/2020

Aerodynamic Forces on an Airfoil Aerodynamic Forces on an Airfoil


• V∞ is the relative wind, defined as the flow velocity far
ahead of the body. The flow far away from the body is 
called the freestream, and hence V∞ is also called the
freestream velocity. By definition,
L  lift  component of R perpendicular to V ,
D  drag  component of R parallel to V ,
N  normal force  component of R perpendicular to c,  
A  axial force  component of R parallel to c.

The angle of attack  is defined as the angle between


c and V . Sign convention for aerodynamic moments.
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 9 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 10

9 10

Aerodynamic Coefficients Aerodynamic Coefficients


• We define a dimensional quantity called the freestream
dynamic pressure as A
Axial force coefficient: CA 
1 q S
q   V2
2 M
L Moment coefficient: CM 
Lift coefficient: CL  q Sl
q S
In the above coefficients, the reference area S and
D
Drag coefficient: CD  reference length l are chosen to pertain to the given
q S geometric body shape; for different shapes, S and l may be
N different things.
Normal force coefficient: CN 
q S

04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 11 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 12

11 12
04/21/2020

Aerodynamic Coefficients Aerodynamic Coefficients


• For 2D bodies such as airfoils, the appropriate reference • The local coefficients are defined for each spanwise
area/span is simply the chord c, and the reference length is location on a wing and may vary across the span.
the chord as well.
In contrast
• The local coefficients are then defined as follows: L D M
CL  , CD  , CM  ,
L' q S q S q Sl
Local lift coefficient: cl 
q c
are single numbers which apply to the whole wing.
D'
Local drag coefficient: cd 
q c S  reference area, l  reference lenght,
M' 1
Local moment coefficient: cm  q   V2  free-stream dynamic pressure,
q c 2 2
where the reference area S  c  1  c.   free-stream fluid density, V  free-stream velocity.
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 13 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 14

13 14

Aerodynamic Coefficients Aerodynamic Coefficients


• Two additional dimensionless quantities of immediate use • It may be demonstrated that
are
Lift     V2  S  Factor
p  p
Pressure coefficient: Cp 
q  Vl V 
Factor  f   ,   ,  ,surface roughness,air turbulence 
  a 

Skin friction coefficient: Cf 
q   attitude of body,
  coefficient of viscosity (dynamic),
where p∞ is the freestream pressure and τ is the shear
stress distribution over the body surface.   kinematic viscocity of the fluid,
a  speed of sound of fluid.

04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 15 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 16

15 16
04/21/2020

Aerodynamic Coefficients Aerodynamic Coefficients


cl
• From dimensional analysis it may also be demonstrated Stall due to separation
that
L cl ,max
CL   f1  Re , M  , ;   ,
q S
D d
CD   f 2  Re , M  , ;   , a0  cl  lift slope
q S d
1
M
CM   f3  Re , M  , ;   ,
q Sl
where s 
 L 0 0
V Vl
M  , Re    ,    .
a  Schematic of lift-coefficient variation with angle of attack for an airfoil.
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 17 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 18

17 18

Aerodynamic Coefficients Aerodynamic Coefficients


cm cl
cm,c 4
Lift curve
0.1

0 16 
8 
8 16
 0
1 Moment curve Angle of attack  
cm ,0
dc 0.1
cm ,  m  moment slope
d

0 Variation (smoothed) of section moment coefficient about the


 quarter chord for an NACA 63-210 airfoil. Re = 3 × 106.
negative stall  stall  , s
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 19 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 20

19 20
04/21/2020

cm ,0 of Airfoil Sections Aerodynamic Coefficients


cm,c 4
NACA 0012
Positive camber 0.3
cm ,0 negative NACA 2412
0.2

0.1 cm,0  0
Zero camber cm,c 4
0.0
cm ,0  0
0.1 cm ,0  0 
0.2
Negative camber
0.3 
cm,0 positive 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20
Moment curves for symmetric (NACA 0012) and cambered (NACA 2412) airfoils.
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 21 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 22

21 22

Aerodynamic Coefficients Aerodynamic Coefficients


cm ,ac



The variations of pitching moment coefficient versus angle of attack

cm ,ac

cl

The variations of pitching moment coefficient versus lift coefficient
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 23 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 24

23 24
04/21/2020

Angle of Attack (AoA) Angle of Attack (AoA)


 L0   ZLL   G  geometric AoA,
Zero Lift Line  L0  zero lift AoA, CL
  absolute AoA.
 L 0 Chord Line
    G   L 0
G CL
 L0   ZLL CL0 1
U  V
   G   L 0 CL  0
 G  geometric AoA,
Positive cambered airfoil  , G
 L0  zero lift AoA,
  L 0 G
  absolute AoA.  L0  0. 
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 25 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 26

25 26

Angle of Attack (AoA) Angle of Attack (AoA)


 L0   ZLL Zero Lift Line  L0   ZLL
Zero Lift Line
Chord Line Chord Line
 L 0
   L 0
G
U  V
U  V CL CL
CL  CL0 G  0
Positive cambered airfoil CL  CL0

 L0  0.  , G  , G
   L0    L0
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 27 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 28

27 28
04/21/2020

Orientation of Airfoil at Zero Lift The Flapped Airfoil


 L0   ZLL Flap
Zero Lift Line
Chord Line

U  V 
G  L 0
      L
CL

Camber Line
“Virtual” increase in
 0 angle of attack
 G   L 0 A
CL  0 
 , G B
 0 U  V
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 29 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 30

29 30

Effect of Flap Deflection on Lift Curve The Flapped Airfoil


cl Pressure distribution of the wing p  p
  10 cp 
cp when Hight Lift Devise (HLD) q
1.5 deflected
 0 

  10
1.0

cl
0.5
 Pressure distribution
  of original wing
10 0 5 10

0.5 x
c

1.0
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 31 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 32

31 32
04/21/2020

The Flapped Airfoil The Flapped Airfoil


L L2 p  p • At the airfoil level, a HLD deflection tends to cause the
cp 
cp q following six changes in the airfoil features:
L1
1. Lift coefficient (cl) is increased.
-
+    L
2. Maximum lift coefficient (cl,max) is increased.
3. Zero-lift angle of attack (αL=0) is changed.
L  L2  L1  0 4. Stall angle (αs) is changed.
5. Pitching moment coefficient is changed.
x
6. Drag coefficient is increased.
c
 7. Lift curve slope is increased.
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 33 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 34

33 34

Effect of Flaps on Lift The Effects of Flaps


without flap deflection with flap deflection without flap deflection
cl with flap deflection

Increase in cl ,max cl cm cd

cl ,max
Same slope
cd ,min

  cl

 s Laminar
0 drag
Change in  L 0 Decrease in  s
bucket

04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 35 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 36

35 36
04/21/2020

Airfoil Nomenclature Airfoil Nomenclature


• Center of Pressure. • Center of Pressure.

The center of pressure (cp) is a point along the airfoil With increasing angle of attack, the position of the cp
chord, aft of the leading edge, about which the moves closer to the center of gravity (cg).
aerodynamic pitching moment equals zero.
The consequence of this movement is that the wing-body
The algebraic summation of the aerodynamic pressures lift has relatively no influence on the overall aerodynamic
over the upper and lower surfaces of the wing produce a moment which can only be varied significantly by
resultant force which has a definite magnitude and controlling the tail plane lift.
direction and can be deemed to act at the cp.

The moment of the force about the cp would then be zero.

04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 37 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 38

37 38

Center of Pressure Airfoil Nomenclature


N' • Aerodynamic Center.
cp The aerodynamic center (ac) is a point along the chord
M'
LE
where the pitching moment is independent of the angle of
A' attack, that is, the derivative of the pitching moment
coefficient, about the ac, with respect to the angle of
xcp attack is zero, ∂cm/∂α = 0.

In the case of a symmetrical wing section, the position of


'  x  N '  M' the ac is fixed and is coincident with the ac.
M LE cp xcp   LE
N'
In the case of a cambered wing, the position of the cp
usually lies aft of the ac.
Center of pressure for an airfoil.
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 39 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 40

39 40
04/21/2020

Airfoil Nomenclature The Pressure Center Movement


• Aerodynamic Center. TE
1.0
Flight angle of attacks
For subsonic sections, the ac lies near the quarter-chord
0.8
position, that is, 25% of the chord length back from the
leading edge.
0.6 Pressure center
For supersonic sections, the position moves aft, closer to
the mid-chord position. 0.4 
ac 0.1
Aerodynamic center
0.2 0.0 cm
Pitching moment coefficient 0.1
0.0  0.2 
LE 4 0 4 8 12 16 20
Angle of attack  
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 41 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 42

41 42

Equivalent Systems of Forces Center of Pressure


L' L' L pl  pu
cp
M c' 4
D' or D' or D'
x
M' c M cp'  0!
LE xcp
4
Resultant Resultant force Resultant force
force at at quarter- at center of L' L' L'
leading edge. chord point. pressure xcp
or or
  1  sin     N '  L '.
Equivalent ways of specifying the force-and-moment system M '0 M'0 M'0
on an airfoil.
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 43 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 44

43 44
04/21/2020

Quarter-chord Point x = c/4 Center of Pressure


F
pl  pu cp

The force on pressure center.


 5  0   5 
F F
L' ac
 M '  0 Addition of two equal and
opposite forces.
xcp xcp xcp 
F F
L'
M'
Force and moment on the
aerodynamic center (ac).
c4 c4 c4 Mc 4 ac
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 45 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 46

45 46

Useful Aerodynamic Expressions Useful Aerodynamic Expressions


 t CL  CL ,0  CL ,  CL ,   HOT .
CL ,  CL  1.8  1  0.8 max 
  c 
tmax
 maximum thickness-to-chord ratio of the airfoil.
c  
 CM ,c 4  C M ,c 4   0  C M , c 4   C M ,c 4   HOT
For 2D airfoils: cl ,  cl  2  0    0   0
  0  0  0

 
  CM ,c 4  0  CM ,0 , C M ,c 4  CM , , CM ,c 4  CM ,  ,
C L  C L  0  C L   CL   HOT ,  0    0   0
 0   00   0  0  0
 0

  CM ,c 4  CM ,0  CM ,  CM ,   HOT .
CL  0  CL ,0 , CL  CL , , CL  CL , ,
 0   00   0
 0
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 47 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 48

47 48
04/21/2020

Divergence Elastic and Flexural Axes


• The mass axis it is the locus of the mass centers of the
cross sections.

• The shear center is defined as the point on a particular 2D


wing cross-section at which a transverse shear load must
be applied in order to produce zero rate of twist (i.e. zero
twist per unit span) at that section; it is important to note
that it is a section property.

• The flexural center is the point on a particular wing cross-


section at which a transverse shear load must be applied in
order to produce zero twist of that section relative to the
ac
U wing root.
Elastic Axis
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 49 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 50

49 50

Elastic and Flexural Axes Elastic and Flexural Axes


• The elastic axis is then defined as the locus of shear The bending and torsion deformation of the wing can be
centers along the wing, whilst the flexural axis (or line) is defined about the elastic axis and the elastic potential (or
the locus of flexural centers, and so is a wing property. strain) energies evaluated in terms of the flexural rigidity
EI and torsional rigidity GJ, both defined about the elastic
For the simple case of a uniform unswept homogeneous
axis.
wing, these axes will be straight, and the elastic and
flexural axes will coincide, whereas for a more realistic Thus the use of the elastic axis permits the static
wing where sweep, taper, warping and cut-outs etc. are decoupling of bending and torsion.
present, then the two axes will be different and sometimes
However, if the mass axis does not coincide with the
difficult to define.
elastic axis then dynamic coupling will occur through
Arguably, the flexural axis is more relevant than the elastic inertia terms.
axis for the more complex cases and can help in
understanding aeroelastic phenomena.
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 51 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 52

51 52
04/21/2020

Divergence Divergence
• Hypotheses: • Hypotheses:

1.   0 and  is small. cl  cl ,0  cl ,  0  2  2 ,

2. Linear Aerodynamics:
L  q Scl  q S  cl ,   2 q S .
 CL ,  constant, HOT  0.
3. 2D-Thin Airfoil Theory:
cm ,c 4  cm,0  cm ,  0  0  0,
 CL  cl , CL ,  cl ,  2 , cl  cl ,0  cl , .

4. Symmetric Airfoil: M c 4  q Sccm ,c 4  0.


 cl ,0  0, cm,0  0. 
cm,  cm ,c 4  0.
  0
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 53 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 54

53 54

Aileron Reversal Aileron Reversal


1.0

Effectiveness
Aileron

Aileron
Reversal
Speed

Rigid Wing
U 
0.0
Equivalent Airspeed

cl
 Elastic Wing
U  elastic

cl
 rigid
04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 55 04/21/2020 Cálculo Estructural III/FCEFyN UNC 2020 by S. Preidikman 56

55 56
04/21/2020

57

You might also like