Testing 2020 Slides

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

17.11.

2020

Reasons for testing


 To inform the teacher and students about
Testing and assessment students’ knowledge (gaps in knowledge)
and progress
 To motivate students to learn
Kristel Ruutmets
2020
 To give a structure to the course
 To find out about students’ language level
and assign them in suitable groups
…

Analysing tests
Good tests should … • Which language skills (listening, reading, writing)
• test what has been taught. and knowledge (vocab, grammar) are covered?
• have clear and specific objectives. • Does the test focus more on receptive or
• have clear, unambiguous instructions; if productive knowledge?
necessary, contain samples. • How varied are the tasks?
• reflect classroom tasks and knowledge. • How clear are the instructions of the tasks?
• be suitable for the level of students. • How attractive is the layout of the test?
• have a good balance of items and timing.
• What is the scoring of individual tasks / the whole
• have a variety of tasks and focus on different test? Is it objective? If there is no scoring, how
skills.
would you score the test?
• have scoring which reflects objectives.
• Which aspects do you like about the test?
• be fairly easy to mark and correct.
• Which changes would you make in the test?

Some test task types I Some test task types II


Use test items that are similar to tasks that  Speaking:
students have been doing in their lessons.
 information-gap, interview, presentation, group
discussion, (guided) role-play, retelling, picture
 Listening and reading: description or story
 order (pictures, events, sentences), match, list,  Writing:
label, answer questions (open-ended, closed), fill  copying, guided writing (based on models,
in the table, gap-fill, multiple-choice, T/F/NI pictures, notes, diagrams), summary writing
statements, correct mistakes, sentence or text (based on a reading text), free writing (e.g. write
completion about your hobbies), dictation, writing a text based
dictation (listening only) on questions or keywords, writing a reply to a
letter/email

1
17.11.2020

Some test task types III Testing terms


 A valid test measures what it is supposed to
 Vocabulary: measure.
 word test, matching, multiple-choice, gap-fill,  A reliable test has consistent and trustworthy
crossword, labelling, classification, word formation, results when administered on different occasions.
anagrams, writing words for definitions or vice
 Objective testing – there is one correct answer
versa,
for every question / item.
 Grammar:
 Subjective testing – it is possible to answer in a
 multiple-choice, sentece completion or number of correct ways.
transformation (rewriting but keeping the meaning
 Washback (backwash) – a positive or negative
the same)
effect a test has on the teaching and learning
process.

Is the test reliable? Validity of a test


 Two learners of obviously different levels get  A multiple-choice written grammar test consists of
roughly the same score on a test. items such as:
 The same learner gets a different score on two How long are you living / do you live / have you
different occasions of taking the same test. lived here now?
 The vocabulary test is based on 15 words/word
combinations. Students have to study around 70  The test is valid for finding out the students’ ability
words/word combinations for the test. to match grammatical forms to their contexts.
 A student takes an oral test. There is only one  The test is valid for finding out students’ ability to
examinar who scores the student on a scale from use different tenses in their contexts in written
0-5. There are no scoring criteria. form and/or orally.
 The answer is „No“ in all the cases.  The test is valid for both occasions given above.

Testing speaking
 You need to test students’ ability to retell the story. Some dangers tests have
What might be the testing criteria?
• Too much focus on accuracy and memory.
• Grades cause unhealthy competition.
• Tests make learners nervous, the results
may not reflect their actual knowledge.
• Negative washback, e.g. teachers focus on
what will be tested, learners focus on what they
think they will be tested on.
• Aim at finding out what students do not
know

2
17.11.2020

Sources used I Sources used II


Scrivener, J. (2011). Learning Teaching. Oxford: Macmillan
Ellis, G., & Ibrahim, N. (2015). Teaching Children How to Education.
Learn. Peaslake: Delta Publishing. Spratt, M., Pulverness, A., & Williams, M. (2005). The Teaching
Hadfield, J., & Hadfield, C. (2008). Introduction to Teaching Knowledge Test Course. Cambridge: CUP.
English. Oxford: OUP. Thornbury, S. (2006). An A-Z of ELT. Oxford: Macmillan
Harmer, J. (2012). Essential Teacher Knowledge. Harlow: Education.
Pearson Education Limited. Walker, A., & White, G. (2013). Technology Enhanced
Harris, M., & McCann, P. (1994). Assessment. Oxford: Language Learning. Oxford: OUP.
Macmillan Heinemann English Language Teaching.
Lindsay, C., & Knight, P. (2006). Learning and Teaching
English. A Course for Teachers. Oxford: OUP.
Pinter , A. (2006). Teaching Young Language Learners. Oxford:
OUP.

You might also like