Steps in Analyzing Case Study:

I. Time Context: It is the time when the situation is to be analyzed. It can also be the
last-mentioned date in the case.
II. Point of View/View Point: Any decision maker or person who is in the position to
make the final recommendation as mentioned in the case.
III. Statement of the Problem: This defines the perceived problem in the case which
becomes the subject of the analysis. It is presented in declarative form.
IV. Statement of the Objectives: These are the goals which the case analysis hopes to
achieve. This basically satisfy the test of SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable,
Realistic, Time-bound). Start with the preposition "To".
V. Areas of Consideration: State the internal and external environment of the
company/firm through SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and
Treats).
VI. Alternative Courses of Action (ACA): These are the possible solutions to the
problem identified. Each ACA must stand alone and must be able to solve the stated
problem and achieve the objectives. Each ACA must be mutually exclusive.
Each ACA must be analyzed in the light of the light of the SWOT analysis and
assumptions, it there are any. Pros and Cons of each ACA should be clearly stated. If
the case contains enough information/data. pros and cons should be supported
quantitatively to minimize bias.
VII. Analysis – Analyze ACA. Lagyan ng advantages and disadvantages.
VIII. Conclusion/Recommendation: Based on the analysis of the ACA's, the conclusion/
recommendation can be made. There is no need to repeat the analysis done in the
ACA section of the analysis.
IX. Plan of Action: The plan of action explains the series of actions to be undertaken to
operationalize the adopted ACA. To ensure that the analysis is done comprehensively,
it would be best to program the plan according to the basic functional areas and to
present the plan.
There is a thin line that separates aggressive hiring from poaching. Poaching is when
you are adamant about hiring an employee at a competitor who has not expressly
shown an interest in joining your organization. Encouraging employees to leave their
current job and defect to your company may help you get good talent, but it may also
prove to be disadvantageous in the long term. The poached employee may gain a poor
reputation as someone who may quit his or her current position easily and is vulnerable
to poaching. And if you’re the one who did the poaching, you risk losing the respect of
your competitors.
Does job poaching of Kanluran University affects the ethical and moral value of its
organization?
The problem arises because of the unethical behavior of Kanluran University in pirating
the top performing personnel of other schools. There is nothing wrong with the mission
of the school to produce a board examination topnotcher but it is important for every
organization to hone their reputation and integrity as well.