The document compares the processes from ITIL v3 to the practices in ITIL 4. ITIL v3 had processes organized into four categories: service strategy, service design, service transition, and service operation. ITIL 4 reorganized these into practices and introduced new practices like architecture management, relationship management, and continual improvement. The core processes and functions remain similar between the two frameworks with some changes to organization and naming.
The document compares the processes from ITIL v3 to the practices in ITIL 4. ITIL v3 had processes organized into four categories: service strategy, service design, service transition, and service operation. ITIL 4 reorganized these into practices and introduced new practices like architecture management, relationship management, and continual improvement. The core processes and functions remain similar between the two frameworks with some changes to organization and naming.
The document compares the processes from ITIL v3 to the practices in ITIL 4. ITIL v3 had processes organized into four categories: service strategy, service design, service transition, and service operation. ITIL 4 reorganized these into practices and introduced new practices like architecture management, relationship management, and continual improvement. The core processes and functions remain similar between the two frameworks with some changes to organization and naming.
The document compares the processes from ITIL v3 to the practices in ITIL 4. ITIL v3 had processes organized into four categories: service strategy, service design, service transition, and service operation. ITIL 4 reorganized these into practices and introduced new practices like architecture management, relationship management, and continual improvement. The core processes and functions remain similar between the two frameworks with some changes to organization and naming.