Oz Revised Statutes 14:3292, states: “It shall be unlawful for any person to intentionally expose his or

her undergarment in a public place.”

It is likely that Julie can argue that she did not violate Oz Revised Statutes 14:3292. Julie was
intentionally in a public place wearing a sports bra when she was ticketed for violating Oz Revised
Statutes 14:3292. The only issue in contention for this case is whether Julie’s clothing is considered an
undergarment. In order to determine this, we will need to research case law in this jurisdiction.

Tom is in violation of Oz Revised Statutes 14:3292. He is a person who intentionally exposed his
undergarment (his briefs) in a public place.

It is likely that Suzie can successfully argue that she did not violate Oz Revised Statutes 14:3292. Julie
was in a public place when her undergarment was exposed. Her undergarment was exposed
unintentionally when her blouse snagged and ripped on a branch. This was clearly not an intentional act
and so she can argue that Oz Revised Statutes 14:3292 was not violated.