The document is a rubric for evaluating student bridge building projects. It assesses bridge structure and effort, use of engineering design/diagrams, bridge reports and reflections, and analysis of bridges. Students can earn scores from 1-4 points in categories such as structural design, explanation of engineering process, use of scientific evidence, and completion of an "About Bridges" worksheet. Higher scores are given for well-designed bridges that can bear weight, detailed explanations of the engineering design process using critical thinking, clear written reports using proper grammar and scientific evidence, and fully completed worksheets with correct answers.
The document is a rubric for evaluating student bridge building projects. It assesses bridge structure and effort, use of engineering design/diagrams, bridge reports and reflections, and analysis of bridges. Students can earn scores from 1-4 points in categories such as structural design, explanation of engineering process, use of scientific evidence, and completion of an "About Bridges" worksheet. Higher scores are given for well-designed bridges that can bear weight, detailed explanations of the engineering design process using critical thinking, clear written reports using proper grammar and scientific evidence, and fully completed worksheets with correct answers.
The document is a rubric for evaluating student bridge building projects. It assesses bridge structure and effort, use of engineering design/diagrams, bridge reports and reflections, and analysis of bridges. Students can earn scores from 1-4 points in categories such as structural design, explanation of engineering process, use of scientific evidence, and completion of an "About Bridges" worksheet. Higher scores are given for well-designed bridges that can bear weight, detailed explanations of the engineering design process using critical thinking, clear written reports using proper grammar and scientific evidence, and fully completed worksheets with correct answers.
The document is a rubric for evaluating student bridge building projects. It assesses bridge structure and effort, use of engineering design/diagrams, bridge reports and reflections, and analysis of bridges. Students can earn scores from 1-4 points in categories such as structural design, explanation of engineering process, use of scientific evidence, and completion of an "About Bridges" worksheet. Higher scores are given for well-designed bridges that can bear weight, detailed explanations of the engineering design process using critical thinking, clear written reports using proper grammar and scientific evidence, and fully completed worksheets with correct answers.
Bridge Structure Use of Bridge About Bridges Analysis and Effort Engineering Report and Design/ Reflection Diagram Structural Engineer The students 3-D The student The students The “About Bridges” bridge structure is engineers written worksheet is filled out to the Excellent exceptional. It effectively explanation uses best of the student’s ability. 4points replicates a explain their scientific The student has used proper researched bridge design in full evidence to grammar and sentence design. The bridge is detail explain how the structure and all of the six able to bear weight throughout the bridge design questions are answered and the engineers design process. enables it to correctly. went beyond The students hold weight. expectation. fully showcased This is critical thinking appreciated as they problem grade level solved design sentence improvements. structure and grammar. Bridge Designer The students 3-D The student The students The “About Bridges” structure is well-done. engineers in written worksheet is filled out and Satisfactory The bridge replicates a basic detail explanation uses there are a couple errors. The 3points researched bridge throughout the basic scientific student has somewhat used design. The bridge is bridge design evidence to proper grammar and able to bear some process. The explain how the sentence structure and some, weight and the students bridge design but not all, of the six engineers followed all demonstrated enables it to questions are answered given instruction. some critical hold weight. The correctly. thinking as they students problem solved frequently use some design grade improvements. appropriate spelling and grammar. Errors exist but do not interfere with the report. Bridge Watcher The students 3-D The student The students There is a portion of the structure gives limited engineers written worksheet that is filled out Needs improvement thought to the explain in few explanation but there are excessive 2points researched bridge details through leaves out lots errors. The student has not design. Their bridge the design of important used proper grammar or may be able to or may process to show scientific sentence structure and there not be able to bear how the bridge evidence to are many incomplete weight. The engineers was created. explore how the sentences. did not follow all The students are bridge design instruction. limited in enables it to showing how hold weight. they used Few if any critical thinking details are used to problem solve in their grammar in the design. and writing, which are not grade level appropriate. There are several errors that interfere with the report. Drive-by Visitor The students 3-D The student The students There is a portion of the structure is missing engineers use written reports worksheet that is not filled Unsatisfactory many components of limited detail did not use out, with excessive errors. 1point a researched bridge through the relative The student has not used design. The bridge design process. scientific proper grammar or sentence can’t hold any weight The students did evidence to structure, making the and there is no not adequately explain how the worksheet hard to evidence of a thought- show how bridge design interpreter. There are many out design. The critical thinking enables it to incomplete sentences and engineers did not was used to hold weight. the spelling/grammar is not follow instruction. show the bridge There are grade level appropriate. design. significant gaps in the information. There are grammar and spelling errors that prevent understanding of the report.