The passage summarizes two essays from the book "Modernism and Food Studies". The first essay analyzes William Faulkner's novel "Sanctuary" and argues that the Southern tradition of hospitality was actually an unequal exchange system that was not a stable foundation for the South's social order or identity. The second essay discusses Langston Hughes' engagement with utopian ideas around the early 20th century chocolate industry and how he used chocolate as a metaphor to challenge racial theories of the time. Overall, the passage emphasizes how the book brings together diverse texts and methodologies to generate new insights at the intersection of modernist studies and food studies.
The passage summarizes two essays from the book "Modernism and Food Studies". The first essay analyzes William Faulkner's novel "Sanctuary" and argues that the Southern tradition of hospitality was actually an unequal exchange system that was not a stable foundation for the South's social order or identity. The second essay discusses Langston Hughes' engagement with utopian ideas around the early 20th century chocolate industry and how he used chocolate as a metaphor to challenge racial theories of the time. Overall, the passage emphasizes how the book brings together diverse texts and methodologies to generate new insights at the intersection of modernist studies and food studies.
The passage summarizes two essays from the book "Modernism and Food Studies". The first essay analyzes William Faulkner's novel "Sanctuary" and argues that the Southern tradition of hospitality was actually an unequal exchange system that was not a stable foundation for the South's social order or identity. The second essay discusses Langston Hughes' engagement with utopian ideas around the early 20th century chocolate industry and how he used chocolate as a metaphor to challenge racial theories of the time. Overall, the passage emphasizes how the book brings together diverse texts and methodologies to generate new insights at the intersection of modernist studies and food studies.
The collection’s final section, “Imagination and Exchange,” focuses on
food as a site of performative hospitalities. For Carrie Helms Tippen, in
“‘A New Confederacy’: The Economy of Southern Hospitality in William Faulkner’s Sanctuary,” one of William Faulkner’s least studied novels provides a powerful critique of Southern hospitality. Hospitality, she shows, functioned in the South as an informal exchange economy, a system later employed to market the South to tourists. The images of gracious hosts setting out bountiful tables for their guests were particularly effective tools for encouraging national reunification after the Civil War. Despite these promises, she argues, Sanctuary shows that the “unequal exchanges” necessitated by hospitality are “neither a stable structure on which to build a social order, nor a gallant system on which to build a proud regional identity” and that “many presumed ‘sanctuaries’ hardly deserve the designation.” Adam Fajardo explores another sort of “sanctuary” in “Here There Will Be No Unhappiness: Chocolate and Langston Hughes’s Utopian Impulse,” albeit one that veers into “impossible” social relations. Fajardo argues that Hughes engaged with a little-studied utopian discourse that fermented around the early-twentieth-century chocolate industry. Using chocolate as a racial metaphor, Hughes mounts a challenge to the primitivist theories of race that dominated the modernist era. The diversity of texts, concerns, and methodologies collected in Modernism and Food Studies attests to the generative power of combining these two vibrant disciplines. The organizing logic of the chapters, broadly speaking, moves from early in the period (Wilde, Huysmans) to late (Tarashankar, Hughes) and from the particular (the body, cookbooks) to the abstract (utopian impulses and dreams deferred). But we also invite the reader to move through the collection as one might at a buffet, sampling here and there, experiencing the novel combinations that would have been lost had these essays been published individually. For if there is anything we have learned from creating a shared space for new modernist studies and food studies to mingle, it is that much can be gained from unexpected encounters.