Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rubber-Compositional Analysis by Thermogravimetry (TGA) : Standard Test Method For
Rubber-Compositional Analysis by Thermogravimetry (TGA) : Standard Test Method For
Rubber-Compositional Analysis by Thermogravimetry (TGA) : Standard Test Method For
for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Tue Dec 15 10:50:54 EST 2020
1
Downloaded/printed by
Universidad Industrial de Santander (Universidad Industrial de Santander) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
D6370 − 99 (2019)
5.3 This test method is not suitable for rubber compounds 9.4 Heat from 50 to 560°C at 10°C/min.
containing filler materials which decompose in the temperature 9.5 Cool to 300°C and allow the temperature to equilibrate
range of 50 to 800°C, for example, CaCO3, Al(OH)3(3H2O), for a minimum of 2 min.
etc. Analysis of compounds containing fillers of this type
requires knowledge of the filler type and some correction for 9.6 Change the purge gas to air or oxygen and purge at 75
mass loss. cm3/min or the manufacturer’s recommended flow.
9.7 Heat from 300 to 800°C at 10°C/min.
6. Apparatus
10. Calculation
6.1 Thermogravimetric Analyzer—A system of related in-
struments that are capable of continuously weighing a test 10.1 Record the percent mass loss for organics, carbon
sample, at a sensitivity of 62 µg, and recording the change in black, and ash as follows (see Fig. 1):
mass of the test sample under atmospheric control over a 10.2 For EPDM, NR, PE, PP and SBR:
specified temperature range. Component % Mass Loss
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Tue Dec 15 10:50:54 EST 2020
2
Downloaded/printed by
Universidad Industrial de Santander (Universidad Industrial de Santander) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
D6370 − 99 (2019)
TABLE 1 Precision for Thermogravimetric Analysis
(Type 1 Precision)
NOTE 1—No relative precision given for percent ash, mean values close to zero.
Part 1—Percent Organics
Within Laboratories Between Laboratories
Material Mean SrA rB (r)C SRD RE (R)F
C 63.7 0.171 0.478 0.75 0.248 0.694 1.09
B 64.9 0.252 0.705 1.09 1.933 5.41 8.34
A 65.4 0.109 0.306 0.47 0.181 0.508 0.78
Part 2—Percent Carbon Black
Within Laboratories Between Laboratories
Material Mean Sr r (r) SR R (R)
A 34.3 0.113 0.316 0.92 0.157 0.439 1.28
B 34.6 0.224 0.628 1.82 1.73 4.850 14.02
C 34.6 0.106 0.296 0.86 0.186 0.520 1.50
Part 3—Percent Ash
Within Laboratories Between Laboratories
Material Mean Sr r SR R
A 0.26 0.110 0.307 0.134 0.375
B 0.31 0.094 0.264 0.158 0.442
C 1.64 0.144 0.403 0.244 0.682
A
Sr = repeatability standard deviation, in measured %.
B
r = repeatability, in measured %.
C
(r) = repeatability, relative basis, % of %.
D
SR = reproducibility standard deviation, in measured %
E
R = reproducibility, in measured %
F
(R) = reproducibility, relative basis, % of %
12.2 The precision results in this precision and bias section established as the value tabulated in Table 1 for each material.
give an estimate of the precision of this test method with the Two single test results, obtained under normal test method
materials (rubbers, etc.) used in the particular interlaboratory procedures, that differ by more than this tabulated r (for any
test program (ITP) as described below. The precision param- given level) must be considered as derived from different or
eters should not be used for acceptance or rejection testing of nonidentical sample populations.
any group of materials without documentation that the param- 12.5 Reproducibility—The reproducibility R, for each test
eters are applicable to the particular group of materials and the (organics, carbon black, ash) of this test method has been
specific testing protocols of the test method. established as the value tabulated in Table 1 for each material.
12.3 A Type 1 interlaboratory test program was conducted Two single test results obtained in two different laboratories,
in 1998 on three materials or compounds (A, B, C) containing under normal test method procedures, that differ by more than
35 % carbon black; A = EPDM, B = NBR and C = SBR. the tabulated R must be considered to have come from different
Thirteen laboratories participated in the ITP conducting dupli- or nonidentical sample populations.
cate tests on each of two successive test days. A test result is
12.6 The relative repeatability and reproducibility, (r) and
the average of two measurements for each of the tests
(R), also are given in Table 1. These precision parameters have
conducted; % organics, % carbon black and % ash. The
the same applicability statements as given in 12.4 and 12.5.
database generated by the ITP was subjected to h-outlier and
k-outlier analysis as given by Practice D4483. Several outlying 12.7 Bias—In test method terminology, bias is the difference
laboratories were found for the tests; the outlier values were between an average test value and the reference (or true) test
deleted and replaced by the average values for all laboratories property value. Reference values do not exist for this test
for that test and material. The revised database (outliers method since the value (of the test property) is exclusively
removed) was then analyzed for test method precision. The defined by the test method; therefore, bias cannot be deter-
results are given in Table 1. The results in the table indicate that mined.
the precision for the NBR compound is substantially poorer
than for EPDM and SBR. 13. Keywords
12.4 Repeatability—The repeatability r, for each test 13.1 ash; carbon black; filler; oil; organics; plasticizer;
(organics, carbon black, ash) of this test method has been polymer; rubber; thermogravimetry
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Tue Dec 15 10:50:54 EST 2020
3
Downloaded/printed by
Universidad Industrial de Santander (Universidad Industrial de Santander) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
D6370 − 99 (2019)
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org). Permission rights to photocopy the standard may also be secured from the Copyright Clearance Center, 222
Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, Tel: (978) 646-2600; http://www.copyright.com/
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Tue Dec 15 10:50:54 EST 2020
4
Downloaded/printed by
Universidad Industrial de Santander (Universidad Industrial de Santander) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.