Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Moazzami Daniel
Moazzami Daniel
Moazzami Daniel
English 111
Professor Williams
My writing changed to be more expressive and personal during this course. The revisions
on my essay don’t really encapsulate these changes, but the essay overall is a good
demonstration of how I became more personal with my writing. This personality has really
boosted my confidence in my writing. I felt like I can write about anything. I would like to give
The essay I chose represents my best work because it is something that I am very
passionate about. As a person, you tend to care more about stuff you are passionate about. My
passion is making the world a better place. My essay’s topic is about transitioning from
nonrenewable energy to renewable energy. When I started writing this essay, I started with just
getting my rough ideas down on the outline. I didn’t want to keep the ideas short because I had a
clear general idea, so I went into depth a bit with it. This helped me with fleshing out my ideas in
Peer Review helped me with the essay and how it was structured. Instructor Review
helped me find all the large issues that the Peer Reviewer wasn’t sure about. My overall use of
the writing processes of prewriting, drafting, and revising helped me strengthen my essay by
capturing all my main thoughts and chiseling them out, almost like carving out a marble
The strongest part of my essay is probably my general ideas. My revisions didn’t really
change this. I would like to revise my essay with further instruction on how to make stronger
arguments in papers like mine. This type of writing is new to me, and it would be beneficial to
know more about how to write it, because I really like this type of writing.
I honestly really enjoyed this class because it help relight the torch of my writing. It
brought me back into something that I loved to do, but drew away from because the teaching of
years before was not sufficient to keep me interested. I don’t think any single thing requires more
focus as this is a single class, and other classes probably teach about the other topics in depth. I
would recommend this class to anyone debating whether they should take. it
For A Brighter Future
The US is at a crossroads for how we should approach energy production in the future.
Energy production through fossil fuel extraction has been the staple of how the US produces its
energy for much of its existence. It hasn’t been until the past 50 years or so that debates in the
legislative positions of our country have happened discussing whether this should change. There
have been two sides to this story. One side has been pushing for the transfer of our energy
production from nonrenewable fossil fuels to alternative renewable energy sources. The other
side has been saying that the transfer from nonrenewable to renewable would be too costly. They
have said that the technology doesn’t exist yet and the production of available technology is too
I believe that the US should embark on a journey to transition from nonrenewable energy
to renewable energy. Though the side that is against this transition doesn’t believe so, this
transfer would be beneficial to all citizens of America if signed into legislation with proper
legislative considerations. “The bottom line: Renewables are now cheaper than the average cost
to operate coal and the average cost to build new natural gas.” (Marcacci) The number one
prospect of a transition to renewable energy would be lessen the pollution and destruction of our
environment, hence a common name of renewable energy being “Green Energy”. Renewable
energy sources cause little, if not no, pollution nor do they impact the health of the population
negatively.
The side against this transition often discusses the costs of the said transition. They are
not wrong when they say it will be expensive to install, but they are wrong to say that it isn’t
needed: “Cheap renewable energy, climate policies and the coronavirus are pushing fossil fuel
companies towards a process of "terminal decline" that could trigger a new financial crisis unless
regulators act”. (Green) They discuss how the technology to create these alternative forms of
energy aren’t feasible yet or take up too many resources, but our country is extraordinarily
capable of devoting our research capabilities to make these alternative forms of energy more cost
efficient. And we are actively doing that right now: “Over the last decade, wind energy prices
have fallen 70% and solar photovoltaics have fallen 89% on average” (Marcacci)
Another talking point that people against the transfer of renewable energy use is that
workers that are already working in nonrenewable energy sectors will lose their jobs. That is
completely true, but instead of using this as a scapegoat against renewable energy, we should
look at ways to account for this. Why don’t we start making it easier for these workers to learn
that new field of energy production. Also, due to the nearing collapse of the fossil fuel industry,
we should be finding ways to account for our non-renewable fuel source workers so they don’t
suffer in the future: “… Companies across the fossil fuels system are worth $18 trillion in listed
equity, a quarter of the value of global equity markets.” (Green) That would be disastrous for
workers. There will be so many new jobs to fill because of a transition to renewable energy: “As
many as 25 million jobs will be created in the U.S. by an aggressive climate plan.” (Griffith,
Calisch)
A point that should be brought up is the tax burden on the US population from an
initiative to push towards renewable energy in America. Renewable energy critics say that
American people shouldn’t have raised taxes. This shouldn’t be the case. We have evolved past
this notion that we should be individualist and to only worry about ourselves. That’s just not the
case with our society. We should contribute to our society in the form of taxes. Our infrastructure
is crumbling because of lower taxes and misappropriated budgeting. People shouldn’t have to
worry about paying for their suspension being blown out because of a pothole from all the years
of road degradation from no Department Of Transportation funding. The same applies to energy
production. In fact, it would be cheaper in the long run: “With an optimal regulatory
environment, low cost financing, huge industrial scale and steady technology improvements we
can save more than $2500 per year per household.” (Griffith, Calisch)
Moving into the realm of renewable energy being our number 1 source of energy, and
eventually our only source of energy, will be a turning point in our definition of America. The
benefits that renewable energy on a large scale will bring to the American people will be great.
The long term effects of this will make life cheaper for us, as well as providing jobs. You also
have the added enjoyment of having a clean environment. The transfer to renewable energy
production will usher in a new golden age in America. The pure grit and innovation that America
Works Cited
Green, Matthew. “'Terminal Decline' of Fossil Industry Risks Crisis Unless Regulators
www.reuters.com/article/us-climate-change-fossil/terminal-decline-of-fossil-industry
-risks-crisis-unless-regulators-act-study-idUSKBN23B1AL.
Griffith, Saul, and Sam Calisch. “No Place Like Home: Fighting Climate Changing (And
static1.squarespace.com/static/5e540e7fb9d1816038da0314/t/5f9125184a17493652d
b0ba9/1603347768714/No_Place_Like_Home_RA.pdf.
Marcacci, Silvio. “Renewable Energy Prices Hit Record Lows: How Can Utilities Benefit
From Unstoppable Solar And Wind?” Forbes, Forbes Magazine, 20 Jan. 2020,
www.forbes.com/sites/energyinnovation/2020/01/21/renewable-energy-prices-hit-rec
ord-lows-how-can-utilities-benefit-from-unstoppable-solar-and-wind/?sh=652281602
c84.