Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
MIMAROPA Region
Schools Division of Marinduque
Mogpog District
BALANACAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM

S.Y. 2017 – 2018

Name of Employee: DANTE M. MENDOZA Name of Rater: LEGORIA R. LAMOC

Position: SST – I Position: Principal I
Review Period: 2017 – 2018 Date of Review: _________________
Division: Marinduque

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Weight RATING SCORE
PER Efficiency, Timeliness) per
KRA Objectives
1. Teaching- Prepared lesson June 2017 – 20% QUALITY 2% 4 0.8
Learning Process plans, daily logs of March 2018 5 – all daily logs contained objectives, strategies,
activities including materials, activities and remediation.
appropriate,
adequate and 4 – lacked 1 indicator
updated 3 – lacked 2 indicators
instructional 2 – lacked 3 indicators
materials 1 – lacked 4 indicators

TIMELINESS
5 – submitted all complete daily log 2 times a week
4 – submitted all complete daily log once a week
3 – submitted incomplete daily log 2 times a week
1 – submitted incomplete daily log 1 times a week
Facilitate Learning 14% 4 0.56
in the Secondary
through functional
lesson plans, daily
logs and innovative
teaching strategies
Initiated discipline June 2017 – QUALITY 2% 4 0.08
of students March 2018 5 – 40-35 students were guided in the observation
including rules and guideline.
 classroom rules and 4 – 34-30 students were guided in the observation
guidelines and rules and guideline.
group task. 3 – 29-25 students were guided in the observation
rules and guideline.
2 – 24-20 students were guided in the observation
rules and guideline.
1 – 14-10 students were guided in the observation
rules and guideline.

TIMELINESS
5 – 75% of students were guided in the classroom
rules and regulations during class hours.
4 – 70% of students were guided in the classroom
rules and regulations during class hours.
3 – 65% of students were guided in the classroom
rules and regulations during class hours.
2 – 60% of students were guided in the classroom
rules and regulations during class hours.
1 – 55% of students were guided in the classroom
rules and regulations during class hours.
2. Pupil/ Student a. Monitor and June 2017 – 60% QUALITY 5% 5 0.25
Outcome evaluated student March 2018 5 – More than 75% of students increased their
progress. performance in Math 8 subject
4 - More than 70% of students increased their
performance in Math 8 subject
3 - More than 65% of students increased their
performance in Math 8 subject
4 - More than 60% of students increased their
performance in Math 8 subject
5 - More than 55% of students increased their
performance in Math 8 subject

EFFICIENCY
5 – 60 students were 80% and above GSA
4 – 55 students were 80% and above GSA
3 – 50 students were 80% and above GSA
2 – 45 students were 80% and above GSA
1 – 40 students were 80% and above GSA
b. Maintained June 2017 – QUALITY 5% 5 0.25
updated students’ March 2018 5 – More than 85% of students’ record were
school records documented and completed in Math 8 subject.
4 – More than 80% of students’ record were
 documented and completed in Math 8 subject.
3 – More than 75% of students’ record were
documented and completed in Math 8 subject.
2 – More than 70% of students’ record were
documented and completed in Math 8 subject.
1 – More than 65% of students’ record were
documented and completed in Math 8 subject.

TIMELINESS
5 – 100%-95% of students compiled their academic
requirement at a given time
4 – 90%-85% of the students compiled the
requirement.
3 – 80%-75% of the students compiled the
requirement.
2 – 70%-65% of the students compiled the
requirement.
1 – 60%-55% of the students compiled the
requirement.
Conducted June 2017 – QUALITY 10% 4 0.4
remediation or March 2018 5 – 85% of students participated in the remediation
enrichment 4 – 80% of students participated in the remediation
activities 3 – 75% of students participated in the remediation
2 – 70% of students participated in the remediation
1 – 65% of students participated in the remediation

TIMELINESS
5 – conduct enrichment activity 4 times a week
4 – conduct enrichment activity 3 times a week
3 – conduct enrichment activity 2 times a week
2 – conduct enrichment activity 1 times a week
1 – never conducted activity

Attained the 40% 4 1.6

required GSA for
grade level and
learning areas
3. Community Conducted PTA June 2017 – 10% QUALITY 4% 4 0.16
Involvement meetings March 2018 5 – conducted 5 PTA meetings
4 – conducted 4 PTA meetings
3 – conducted 3 PTA meetings
2 – conducted 2 PTA meetings
 1 – conducted 1 PTA meetings

TIMELINESS
5 – 85% attendance of PTA members in meeting/
conferences
4 – 81% attendance of PTA members in meeting/
conferences
3 – 78% attendance of PTA members in meeting/
conferences
2 – 75% attendance of PTA members in meeting/
conferences
1 – 72% attendance of PTA members in meeting/
conferences
Visit parents of June 2017 – QUALITY 4% 2 0.08
students needing March 2018 5 – attended community services 4 times a year
academic 4 – attended community services 3 times a year
monitoring to 3 – attended community services 2 times a year
follow-up 2 – attended community services 1 times a year
1 – never attended community services
Undertaken/ initiate June 2017 – 2% QUALITY 2% 4 0.8
projects/ activities March 2018 5 – 100%-90% responded to the invitation
with external 4 – 85%-80% responded to the invitation
funding 3 – 75%-70% responded to the invitation
sponsorship 2 – 65%-60% responded to the invitation
1 – 55%-50% responded to the invitation

TIMELINESS
5 – talked to students who needs remediation 3 times
in grading period.
4 – talked to students who needs remediation 2 times
in grading period.
3 – talked to students who needs remediation 1 times
in grading period.
2 – talked to students who needs remediation once
every quarter
1 – talked to students who needs remediation once
every 3 quarter
4. Professional Conduct action 10% 2% 0 0.0
Growth research
Participated in 3% 4 0.12
activities such as
teachers association
 etc.
Served as Canteen 3% 2 0.06
Manager and other
related task.
Received special 2% 0 0.0
awards/citation for
exemplary
performance.
SCORE 100% 3.8
OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 3.8

DANTE M. MENDOZA LEGORIA R. LAMOC

Ratee Rater
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION
Final Performance Result Rating Adjectival Rating:
Accomplishment of KRAs and Objectives 3.800 VS (Very Satisfactory)

Employee – Supervisor Agreement

The signature below confirms that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to contents of the performance as captured in this form.

Name of Employee DANTE M. MENDOZA Name of Supervisor: LEGORIA R. LAMOC

Signature Signature:

Date April 16, 2018 Date April 16, 2020

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Strength Development Needs Action Plan (Recommended Timeline Resources Needed
Developmental Intervention)

Helped in organizing and preparing

nutritious and healthy meals for a Personal and Professional Attend training program and
Year Round Personal and School Fund
healthy body and minds of the Development seminar workshops
students.

DANTE M. MENDOZA LEGORIA R. LAMOC

Ratee Rater