Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Restructuring A Specialty Animal Hospital (Organizational Analysis & Restructuring Proposal)
Restructuring A Specialty Animal Hospital (Organizational Analysis & Restructuring Proposal)
Restructuring A Specialty Animal Hospital (Organizational Analysis & Restructuring Proposal)
Eric Foltrauer
December 7, 2015
Restructuring a Specialty Animal Hospital 2
I. Case
For 2 years, I’ve worked in the emergency room of a veterinary hospital run by an
the only radiation treatment machine on Long Island that is used for animals. The Center for
History
The Center for Specialized Veterinary Care (CSVC) in Westbury, New York was
incorporated twenty-two years ago in 1993. The trend of hospitalizing animal companions has
substantially increased in America during the 1980s which saw a sudden increase in pet
ownership. The growth in demand for medical pet services emerged in a vacuum on Long Island.
Suburban families, which highly populate the region, consider buying or rescuing a pet when
they have expendable income. There existed primary care veterinary offices within and among
the communities of Long Island. There was however not a sufficient supply of advanced care for
beloved pets, or animal companions. Critical and peculiar problems can only be remedied by
veterinary facilities that specialize in areas such as emergency and intensive care, dermatology,
oncology, cardiology, neurology and neurosurgery, radiology and imaging, surgery, internal
medicine, hyperbaric oxygen treatment, and alternative medicine that includes utilizing Chinese
herbs as treatments. After its inception, other specialty hospitals in the local region were
established.
Restructuring a Specialty Animal Hospital 3
The emergency room of the facility is also designated as the intensive care unit which
houses animal-patients that are in danger of acute, deteriorative relapses from their presented
chronic or acute states or ‘primary problems’ that is, their reason for inpatient stay. Although the
entire hospital requires intervention, for the purposes of this article, only one department, the ER,
will be used as an example that can be carried on to the rest of the organization.
Problem
Protocol is a very frequently heard word on any given day at the hospital. It refers to the
way in which every work-related task should be done according to those in charge, the executive
doctors. Proper protocol takes into account everything from the organization of clinical areas
such as the crash carts, procedure tables, counter and drawer space, the proper usage of blood
machines, handling of medical equipment such as oxygen tanks, sleeping gas masks, pulse-Ox
machines, the management of medical records, and step-by-step medical procedure instructions.
From the simple stocking and organization of supplies to the delicate techniques used for clinical
procedures, all protocol is subject to change and some of it changes with great frequency.
CSVC considers the education of its staff a very high priority. Teaching is taken very
seriously by the managing technicians who are in charge of all the workers of a given department
but the specialists do not successfully explain and implement new standards and practices.
Change here currently starts at the top, with those who make decisions, and are sent down to
employees who actually do the majority of the work. Since the specialists are overworked, they
do not have the chance to show how to use the new pulse-Ox machine, for example, which reads
Restructuring a Specialty Animal Hospital 4
how much oxygen is in the blood of a patient or, explain the new series of blood tests that will be
routinely used.
The usual route for communicating change is by writing emailed memos. They have
instructions to be read and understood by everyone. Recipients must then respond to the doctor
who sent the memo and say whether or not they comprehend the new change. The doctors, who
each run a department, have the least time of anyone to be making sure people understand how to
conduct a physical process that has been relayed via written words.
Since the departments were made based on the function of specific jobs, employees with the
same skills were placed together; working together as a group dissociated from the rest of the
organization.
The dedication to the chains of demand—i.e., the line of reporting to specific individuals
based on authority—are very high. There are multiple chains of command at the hospital; one in
each department. The unity of command, or the prevalence to only report to one superior, is
strong in every department. The span of control, or the quantity of subordinates that can be
directed well, for each manager is small. There are too many managers. Some of them do
redundant work, like scheduling, resulting in frustrated employees and beleaguered managers.
Since all of the decision making at the organization is centralized, employees performing
small but necessary tasks get little say in making the processes more efficient. This leads to a
The bureaucratic structure makes very rigid regulations and procedures, centralized
authority, detached departments, constricted spans of control, little communication, feedback and
change, and a single route of decision making within each department. Since factors in avant-
Restructuring a Specialty Animal Hospital 5
garde medicine cannot flourish with the typical standardizations applied to organizations, the
hospital should be made less standardized. Innovation departments like Respiratory Therapy and
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy can be quite variant, they need different measures and space for
creativity. The new respiratory treatments become popular often, the hospital has not been
II. Diagnosis
structure that was thought to be sufficient by the founders of the company. The problems begin
with the lack of communication from the top. Doctors cannot tell their staffers every new piece
of information. The hierarchical aspects of the structure result in subordinates not being made
aware of updates relevant to them that are not recognized as important by the doctors who first
find out about the changes. This leads to the doctors forgetting to mention these less pertinent
updates that involve the responsibilities of subordinates. The bureaucratic aspects of the structure
result in the implementation of changes that make some work more difficult. This is because the
employees who actually conduct the procedures were not asked how such procedures can be
improved. Those mandating changes have no familiarity with the actual proceedings of most of
is imprinted in scientific history as the convention the global medical community uses to conduct
training and practice. Specialists with the most experience train interns, those who are learning.
Their medical opinions are superior to those had by doctors with less practice. Thus, hospitals
Restructuring a Specialty Animal Hospital 6
are run in a chain fashion. At the top, there’s the specialists. Next is the managing technicians
who run the work done in their respective departments. Everyone is commanded in a downward
fashion, giving an air of certainty to all work commanded. But when doctors delegate explaining
This hierarchical structure the hospital has is ineffective vestige of earlier organizational
models. It is no longer useful in the new environment because doctors are spending less time
with subordinates than they used to, and the majority of protocol updates do not pertain to
clinical procedures that are strictly conducted by medical specialists. The following
communication failures that result include opinionated argument driven by the fear of conducting
a task in a way not condoned by official updates. Occasionally, arguments ensue in critical
emergency situations that do not come with ample time. Eventually there are two versions of the
same process or procedure taking place at the hospital, one official and one outdated.
Currently, the specialists make all the decisions regardless of how mundane the issue may
be (see Figure 1 below). Then, as mentioned earlier, they send memos, receive responses, and
expect everyone to be well-informed. The specialists are overburdened by the requests they get
are informally communicating with each other to teach what has been overlooked by upper
management. These teams are mostly defined by position. Assistants are discussing protocol
updates together, as are technicians and managers. Nearly all of the staff at CSVC have high
personal motivation (they take their work personally). They are professional, accomplished,
Restructuring a Specialty Animal Hospital 8
motivated, discerning individuals from all breadth of training in canine and feline veterinary
health. But they are being hindered by a flurry of contradictive opinions and hearsay which
causes uncertainty in the conduction of relevant procedures and anxious discussion in emergency
situations in employees argue about best practice and consequences of subpar practice.
Very involved leaders who try to make sure every employee is aligned with new changes
being made, or taking place, in an organization are referred to as transformational leaders. Joris
van der Voet found that transformational leaders are essential to emergent change—that is,
change that organically occurs. So, if a new structure is emerging, having an interpersonally
skilled leader already familiar with the operations of the hospital will be necessary to make
IV. Intervention
The hospital will function more seamlessly with interlayered teams, teams composed of
individuals from each department who can bring complementary knowledge in problem-solving
situations. The task of restructuring an organization should be organized into three phases, each
with multiple tasks. In phase one, the project must be organized, parameters must be decided,
and the state of the organization as it presently stands must be assessed. Decentralization and
defining clear responsibilities are the main themes of the first phase (Recardo & Heather 2013).
Restructuring a Specialty Animal Hospital 9
incumbency (Recardo & Heather 2013). Assistants will discuss and learn, together, the new
processes presented in memos. Technicians will do the same as well as managers and specialists.
Then a representative of each position-based group will be part of team composed of a specialist,
a managing technician, a non-managing technician, and an assistant (see Figure 2 on the next
page). The representatives should be decided by recognizing then officially installing those who
naturally emerge as leaders in the process (Voet 2014). Teams will focus on one aspect of
hospital care like emergency procedures, non-emergency procedures, patient comfort, blood
Restructuring a Specialty Animal Hospital
10
machine scheduling, etc. The representative will then dispense the official protocol along with
The teams will have a fairly high authority and report only to the liaison who represents
them. Spans of control should be maximized and the team making the restructuring decisions
should be made up of a diverse group (Recardo & Heather 2013). No longer will each
department head, manager, and room leader have to make sure everyone under him or her has
been properly briefed and taught about updated protocol. This division of labor will free up time
for maximal clinical work. The managerial hierarchy already in place will be functioning
alongside the team-based network to do its job as originally entrusted, but now with less
distraction. The position-based groups will hold workshops to demonstrate new protocol,
techniques, procedures, and allow for discussion and answering relevant questions. They need to
revisit the topic semi-regularly to review the progress of the updated protocol. If the organization
were to implement this, executive doctors, upper management, and room leaders would be able
challenges and want to stay at the top of animal care in the whole of the United States are
motivated to be ahead of the trends. Also, procedures and instruments improve for the purposes
of effectiveness. Developed updates by the executive doctors include some of the most important
11
References
Joris van der Voet (2014). The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public
Recardo R.J., & Heather, K. (2013). Ten Best Practices for Restructuring the Organization.