Report - Arc Flash27112020

Ultratech Cement Ltd
MUMBAI
ARC FLASH STUDY REPORT
1 Revised on customer remarks 27/11/2020 CBR RC CBR

00 Initial Submission 15/11/2020 CBR RC CBR
Revision Revision Particulars Date Reviewed Checked Approved

CLIENT Ultratech Cement Ltd,MUMBAI
PROJECT 132 kV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION NETWORK,80 TPH ROLLER PRESS GRINDING UNIT AT PATLIPUTRA
PROJECT ID PCORD /1/2020-21

CONSULTANT
DOC NO REVISION: 1
No. of Pages 47 (INCLUDING THIS FRONT PAGE)
Contents
Sl.No Particulars Page No

1 Notes on ArcFlash Analysis 3
2 Arc Flash Boundaries illustration 15
3 Arc Flash Energy Calculation Table 16
4 ArcFlash Labels 18
5 PPE Illustrations 39
Notes on Arc Flash Analysis
ARC FLASH RISK ASSESSMENT
Objective:
A person performing a task on energized electrical equipment should be able to survive without permanent physical
damage, should an arc flash occur while the person is performing the task.
Premise:
A potential arc flash hazard is presumed to exist
✓ Whenever energized electrical conductors or circuit parts are considered to be exposed and an employee is within the
limited approach boundary
✓ When an employee works on an energized electrical equipment when conductors or circuit parts are not exposed.
Usually, an Arc Fault event occurs as a result of some movement and Under normal operating conditions. When no
activity is ON, the potential for Arc Fault Hazard is low.
Approach:
In order to prevent the Arc Flash HAzard, one needs
➢ To identify Arc Flash Hazards
➢ To eliminate the likelihood of occurrence of injury of damage to health and potential severity of injury or damage
to Health.
➢ To determine the need for additional protective measures including the use of PPEs
The arc flash risk assessment should be re-evaluated to lower the risk or incident energy prior to determining the
necessary through the appropriate action with respect to the elements of Power Distribution before deciding on PPEs.
PPE should not be the first or only control element used. Properly selected arc-rated PPE limits the severity of an injury
but does not necessarily prevent an injury if an incident occurs.
Considerations:
The requirement for arc flash protection when the incident energy is below 1.2cal/cm2 is not considered critical, since the
expected injury from such an incident will be survivable and non-permanent.
Properly rated PPE should limit the injury to a second-degree burn if an arc flash were to occur while performing work
within the arc flash boundary.
Factors influencing the Likelihood of Arc Flash and Severity of the injury:
✓ The design of the electrical equipment, including its overcurrent protective device and its operating time.
✓ The operating condition of the electrical equipment and the condition of maintenance.
✓ The position of the person in relation to the arc flash.
✓ The incident energy level that is impinged upon the body.
✓ Appropriateness of the safety-related work practices. An abnormal condition exists when all of the normal
operating conditions have not been met.
✓ The arc flash boundary.
✓ The hierarchy of risk controls employed to address arc flash mitigation. Greater would be the risk of injury if
the upstream overcurrent device has not been maintained
✓ The PPE to be used within the arc flash boundary.
✓ PPE is considered the least effective and lowest level of risk control for employee protection and should be the
last line of control , after all other risk controls have been exhausted.
Risk Components:
The two considerations for additional protective measures are required are
✓ the likelihood of occurrence of injury or damage to health
✓ the severity of injury or damage to health
that results from a hazard.
Design Considerations:
Proven designs such as

➢ arc-resistant switchgear
➢ remote racking (insertion or removal),
➢ remote opening and closing of switching devices,
➢ high-resistance grounding of low-voltage and 5000-volt (nominal) systems,
➢ current limitation,
➢ specification of covered bus or covered conductors within equipment
could reduce the risk associated with Arc Flash incidents.
Methods:
If a person’s body (or part of his body) needs to be within the arc flash boundary, in order to perform a task, an arc flash risk
assessment must be performed
✓ to determine the amount of incident energy that might be impinged upon the person, in calories per square
centimetre(Cal/cm2).
✓ to determine the PPE to be used.
The person then must select and use, appropriate PPE, having a rating, at least as high as the predicted incident energy that
is available from the energy source.
There are several methods for estimating the incident Energy and Arc Flash Boundary. NFPA 70E does not limit calculation
methods and other appropriate techniques available to estimate the incident Energy and Arc Flash Boundary.
Within NFPA 70E, there are only two methods that are prescribed for selecting the PPEs for arc flash and the short circuit
current and the fault clearing time needs to be the basis.
1. The incident energy analysis method, which results in an arc flash boundary at a distance where the incident
energy is 1.2 cal/cm2 in accordance with 130.5(G)
2. The arc flash PPE category method, which results in an arc flash boundary selected directly from the tables in
accordance with 130.7(C)(15)
Only one of the methods shall be used on the same piece of equipment. The procedure that defines how to perform the arc
flash risk assessment must also specify which method is preferred.
Incident Energy Analysis Method:

The level of the incident energy shall be based on the working distance of the face and chest area of the person from the
prospective source of the arc flash during the performance of the specific task. With the increase in incident energy
further closer to the working distance considered above , additional PPEs shall be used for parts of the body closer to the
source of the arc flash, than the working distance. Thus, the actual working distance might be different from what is
specified on the label.
Incident Energy Analysis method involves extensive calculation and allows for a more precise determination of PPEs for
working at a given distance from the Equipment or the Electrical System.
Thus, any task performed, at a distance less than the working distance specified is susceptible to exposure to increased
energy levels and the work permit issued considering the distance in the label would become ineffective.
The body parts, such as hands and arms that get extended closer to the working distance would demand usage of
additional protective measures.
The arc rated PPEs used at a rating lesser than the actual rating of the PPE would be enable better protection.
Incident Energy Analysis Method:
The incident energy analysis shall take into consideration
✓ the characteristics of the overcurrent protective device
✓ its fault clearing time
✓ condition of maintenance.
Hence, it is important to update the changes in the Electrical Distribution Systems in incident Energy analysis.
The Change in Electrical Distribution System could be
✓ Addition of a new equipment that would require a new label to be made
✓ Alterations or modifications carried out in an Electrical System for various operational reasons
✓ Changes made in the Power Distribution System by the Utility companies, resulting in a change in the Source Fault levels
Under the above circumstances the ARC Flash Analysis would be required to be reviewed.
The accuracy of the Incident Energy analysis shall be reviewed at an interval not more than 5 years.
Limitations:
While usage of PPE could protect the person from the high energy released from the fault in terms of heat energy. However,
PPE would not provide protection against
✓ The strength of the pressure wave created by the Arc Flash
✓ The shrapnel ejected at a velocity high enough to prevent the body.
TABLE 130.5(G) Selection of Arc-Rated Clothing and Other PPE, when the
Incident Energy Analysis Method Is used (H.3(b) in 2015 version)
Sl. PPE Description Incident Energy Exposure (1.2Cal/Cm2 to 12Cal/Cm2) Incident Energy Exposure
No. (greater than 12Cal/Cm2)
1 Arc-rated clothing with an arc rating equal to or greater than the estimated with an arc rating equal to or greater than the estimated
incident energy a incident energy a
Long-sleeve shirt and pants or coverall or arc flash suit Long-sleeve shirt and pants or coverall or arc flash suit
(SR) (SR)
2 Face Protection Arc-rated face shield and arc-rated balaclava or arc Arc-rated arc flash suit hood
flash suit hood (SR) b
3 Arc-rated (e.g., jacket, parka, rainwear, hard hat liner) (As needed) (e.g., jacket, parka, rainwear, hard hat liner) (As needed)
outerwear
4 Hand Protection Heavy-duty leather gloves, arc-rated gloves, or rubber Arc-rated gloves or rubber insulating gloves with leather
insulating gloves with leather protectors (SR) c protectors (SR) c
5 Head Protection Hard hat Hard hat
6 Eye Protection Safety glasses or safety goggles (SR) Safety glasses or safety goggles (SR)
7 Hearing As appropriate Hearing protection
protection
8 Legs Leather footwear Leather footwear
When using the incident energy analysis method, the selection of PPE must also comply with the requirements of 130.7(C).
TABLE 130.5(G) Selection of Arc-Rated Clothing and Other PPE, when the
Incident Energy Analysis Method Is used (H.3(b) in 2015 version)
SR: Selection of one in group is required.
a :Arc ratings can be for

✓ a single layer, such as an arc-rated shirt and pants or a coverall, or for an arc flash suit or
✓ a multi-layer system if tested as a combination consisting of an arc-rated shirt and pants, coverall, and arc flash suit.
b :Face shields with a wrap-around guarding to protect the face, chin, forehead, ears, and neck area are required by 130.7(C)(10)(c).
Where the back of the head is inside the arc flash boundary, a balaclava or an arc flash hood shall be required for full head and neck protection.
c :Rubber insulating gloves with leather protectors provide arc flash protection in addition to shock protection.
Higher class rubber insulating gloves with leather protectors, due to their increased material thickness, provide increased arc flash protection.
The incident energy analysis shall be updated when changes occur in the electrical distribution system that could affect the results
of the analysis. The incident energy analysis shall also be reviewed for accuracy at intervals not to exceed 5 years.
ARC FLASH RISK ASSESSMENT - PPE category method
When conducting the arc flash risk assessment using the PPE category method, the tables must be used in the following
sequence:
1. It must be determined if an arc flash is likely for the tasks specified
2. If an arc flash is likely, the hierarchy of risk controls must be exhausted before determining necessary PPE.
3. When PPE will be employed as a risk control, the level of PPE necessary must be determined from either Table
130.7(C)(15)(a) for ac systems or Table 130.7(C)(15)(b) for open-air dc systems.
4. Table 130.7(C)(15)(c) must then be used to determine the personal equipment needed to achieve the required PPE
category.
It is inappropriate to utilize the PPE category method as justification for authorizing energized work.
TABLE 130.7(C)(15)(c) Selection of Arc-Rated Clothing and Other PPE,
when the PPE category method is used
Sl. No. PPE Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4
Description Min. 4 cal/cm2 Min. 8 cal/cm2 Min. 25 cal/cm2 Min. 40 cal/cm2
1 Clothing Arc-rated long-sleeve shirt and Arc-rated long-sleeve shirt and Arc-rated long-sleeve shirt (AR) Arc-rated long-sleeve shirt (AR)
pants or pants or Arc-rated pants (AR) Arc-rated pants (AR)
arc-rated coverall arc-rated coverall Arc-rated coverall (AR) Arc-rated coverall (AR)
b
2 Face Arc-rated face shieldb or arc Arc-rated face shield Arc-rated Arc-rated arc flash suit jacket Arc-rated arc flash suit jacket (AR)
Protection flash suit hood flash suit hood (AR) Arc-rated arc flash suit pants (AR)
or / and Arc-rated arc flash suit pants Arc-rated arc flash suit hood
arc-rated balaclava (AR)
Arc-rated arc flash suit hood
3 Over cover Arc-rated jacket, parka, Arc-rated jacket, parka, Arc-rated jacket, parka, Arc-rated jacket, parka, rainwear,
rainwear, or hard hat liner (AN) rainwear, or hard hat liner (AN) rainwear, or hard hat liner (AN) or hard hat liner (AN)
4 Protective Equipment Protective Equipment Protective Equipment Protective Equipment
5 Head Hard hat Hard hat Hard hat Hard hat

Protection
6 Eye Protection Safety glasses or safety goggles Safety glasses or safety goggles Safety glasses or safety goggles Safety glasses or safety goggles
(SR) (SR) (SR) (SR)
7 Hearing Hearing protection (ear canal Hearing protection (ear canal Hearing protection (ear canal Hearing protection (ear canal
c c c c
Protection inserts) inserts) inserts) inserts)
c
8 Hand Heavy-duty leather glovesd Heavy-duty leather glovesd Arc-rated glovesd Arc-rated gloves
Protection
9 Foot Leather footwear (AN) Leather footwear Leather footwear Leather footwear
Protection
EQUIPMENT LABELING
AN: As needed (optional).
AR: As required.
SR: Selection required.
a : Arc rating is defined in Article 100.
b : Face shields are to have wrap-around guarding to protect not only the face but also the forehead, ears, and neck, or,
alternatively, an arc-rated arc flash suit hood is required to be worn.
c : Other types of hearing protection are permitted to be used in lieu of or in addition to ear canal inserts provided they are worn
under an arc-rated arc flash suit hood.
d : If rubber insulating gloves with leather protectors are used, additional leather or arc-rated gloves are not required. The
combination of rubber insulating gloves with leather protectors satisfies the arc flash protection requirement.
Exception No. 1: Unless changes in electrical distribution system(s) render the label inaccurate, labels applied prior to the
effective date of this edition of the standard shall be acceptable if they complied with the requirements for equipment labelling in
the standard in effect at the time the labels were applied.
Exception No. 2: In supervised industrial installations where conditions of maintenance and engineering supervision ensure that
only qualified persons monitor and service the system, the information required in 130.5(H)(1) through 130.5(H)(3) shall be
permitted to be documented in a manner that is readily available to persons likely to perform examination, servicing,
maintenance, and operation of the equipment while energized.
82
ARC FLASH ENERGY CALCULATION TABLE
Project: ETAP
Location: 18.0.0C
Contract: Study Case: A_SC
Engineer:
Filename: utcl_patna
Summary - Arc Flash Hazard Calculations
Faulted Bus Fault Current Trip Device

Bolted Fault (kA) Energy
PD Arc Source Trip Device Trip Open FCT Arc Flash Incident Energy Working
ID Nom. kV Equipment Type Gap (mm) Level
Bus PD Fault (kA) ID (cycle) (cycle) (cycle) Boundary (m) (cal/cm²) Distance (cm)
6.6 kV BUS SEC2 6.600 Switchgear 152 15.491 15.491 14.923 6.6kV _IC2 7.50 1.00 8.50 3.4 8.6 46 Level D
Bus1 6.600 Other 13 14.785 14.785 14.255 6.6kV BUS OG3 2.50 1.00 3.50 0.7 3.2 46 Level B
Bus1_Sec1 0.720 MCC 25 33.804 3.688 3.206 CMILL _IC 7.50 1.00 5.00 2.0 13.8 46 Level D
Bus1_Sec 2 0.720 MCC 25 33.795 3.687 3.206 CMILL _IC 7.50 1.00 8.50 2.8 23.5 46 Level D
CMILL LTP SEC 1 0.415 MCC 25 32.602 2.139 1.025 CMILL_OG1 7.50 1.00 8.50 1.6 9.1 46 Level D
CMILL LTP SEC2 0.415 MCC 25 32.560 2.136 1.024 CMILL_OG3 7.50 1.00 8.50 1.6 9.1 46 Level D
CTR1_HV 6.600 Other 13 14.629 14.629 14.107 CMILL _IC 7.50 1.00 8.50 1.2 7.6 46 Level C
CTR2_HV 6.600 Other 13 14.616 14.616 14.094 CMILL _IC 7.50 1.00 8.50 1.2 7.6 46 Level C
C_MILL BUS 6.600 Switchgear 152 14.785 14.785 14.255 CMILL _IC 7.50 1.00 8.50 3.3 8.1 46 Level D
DTR1_HV 6.600 Other 13 14.586 14.586 14.066 CMILL_OG1 7.50 1.00 8.50 1.1 7.6 46 Level C
DTR2_HV 6.600 Other 13 14.475 14.475 13.960 CMILL_OG3 7.50 1.00 8.50 1.1 7.5 46 Level C
MCC10 0.415 MCC 25 27.431 27.431 13.570 CM_LTP_OG1 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.3 0.7 46 Level A
MLDB1 0.415 MCC 25 23.492 23.492 11.954 CM_LTP_OG13 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.3 0.5 46 Level A
MPDB 0.415 MCC 25 23.492 23.492 11.954 CM_LTP_OG14 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.3 0.5 46 Level A
N:BE MTR 0.415 MCC 25 19.740 19.740 8.813 CM_LTP_OG4 8.00 0.00 8.00 1.0 4.6 46 Level C
N:CAP1 0.415 MCC 25 28.995 28.995 14.200 CM_LTP_OG6 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.4 0.8 46 Level A
N:CAP2 0.415 MCC 25 28.960 28.960 14.186 CM_LTP_OG11 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.4 0.8 46 Level A
N:SPARE MTR 0.415 MCC 25 19.740 19.740 8.813 CM_LTP_OG5 4.00 0.00 4.00 0.7 2.3 46 Level B
N:VFD1 0.720 Other 13 33.804 33.804 32.944 CTR1_OG2 1.90 0.00 1.90 0.9 4.9 46 Level C
N:VFD2 0.720 Other 13 33.804 33.804 32.944 CTR1_OG4 1.90 0.00 1.90 0.9 4.9 46 Level C
N:VFD_BHF 0.720 Other 13 33.795 33.795 32.935 CTR2_OG2 1.90 0.00 1.90 0.9 4.9 46 Level C
SPARE 0.415 Other 13 28.995 28.995 15.824 CM_LTP_OG3 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.4 0.9 46 Level A
SPARE2 0.415 MCC 25 23.517 23.517 11.964 CM_LTP_OG7 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.3 0.5 46 Level A
SPARE3 0.415 MCC 25 23.517 23.517 11.964 CM_LTP_OG8 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.3 0.5 46 Level A
SPARE 4 0.415 MCC 25 19.722 19.722 10.360 CM_LTP_OG12 0.62 0.00 0.62 0.2 0.4 46 Level A
# The theoretically derived Lee method was used to determine the incident energy and arc flash boundary for this location since the bolted fault current or nominal voltage are outside the empirical method range. ((Ibf" < 0.7 kA or Ibf" > 106 kA) and (0.208 ≤
Nominal kV ≤ 15 kV))
ARC FLASH LABEL
Flash Protection Shock Protection 132000 VAC
Shock Hazard when
covers removed
Limited Approach Boundary 3.35 m
Cannot be Determined Restricted Approach Boundary 1.17 m
Prohibited Approach Boundary 1.01 m
PPE Glove Class
V-Rating 132000 VAC
Equipment: 132kV Main Bus Moose Source Protective Device:
Equipment Name:
Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020
Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

calculated values and PPE requirements which may result in a hazardous
condition.

Shock Hazard when
covers removed
PPE Glove Class
V-Rating 132000 VAC
Equipment: 132kV Main Bus Zebra Source Protective Device:
Equipment Name:

condition.
Level D Shock Hazard when
Incident Energy (cal/cm²) 8.6 covers removed
Working Distance 45.7 cm Restricted Approach Boundary 0.66 m
Arc Flash Boundary 3.44 m Prohibited Approach Boundary 0.18 m
PPE Requirements have not been approved PPE Glove Class 1
V-Rating 7500 VAC
Equipment: 6.6 kV BUS SEC2 Source Protective Device: 6.6kV _IC2
Equipment Name:

condition.

Level B Shock Hazard when
V-Rating 7500 VAC
Equipment: Bus1 Source Protective Device: 6.6kV BUS OG3
Equipment Name:

condition.
V-Rating 1000 VAC
Equipment: Bus1_Sec 2 Source Protective Device: CMILL _IC
Equipment Name:

condition.

V-Rating 1000 VAC
Equipment: Bus1_Sec1 Source Protective Device:
Equipment Name:

condition.
V-Rating 1000 VAC
Equipment: Bus2_Sec1 Source Protective Device: CMILL _IC
Equipment Name:

condition.

V-Rating 1000 VAC
Equipment: Bus2_Sec2 Source Protective Device: CMILL _IC
Equipment Name:

condition.
V-Rating 7500 VAC
Equipment: C_MILL BUS Source Protective Device: CMILL _IC
Equipment Name:

condition.

V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment: CMILL LTP SEC 1 Source Protective Device: CMILL_OG1
Equipment Name:

condition.
V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment: CMILL LTP SEC2 Source Protective Device: CMILL_OG3
Equipment Name:

condition.

Level C Shock Hazard when
V-Rating 7500 VAC
Equipment: CTR1_HV Source Protective Device: CMILL _IC
Equipment Name:

condition.
V-Rating 7500 VAC
Equipment: CTR2_HV Source Protective Device: CMILL _IC
Equipment Name:

condition.

V-Rating 7500 VAC
Equipment: DTR1_HV Source Protective Device: CMILL_OG1
Equipment Name:

condition.
V-Rating 7500 VAC
Equipment: DTR2_HV Source Protective Device: CMILL_OG3
Equipment Name:

condition.

Level A Shock Hazard when
V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment: MCC10 Source Protective Device: CM_LTP_OG1
Equipment Name:

condition.
V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment Name:

condition.

V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment Name:

condition.
V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment Name:

condition.

V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment: MLDB1 Source Protective Device: CM_LTP_OG13
Equipment Name:

condition.
V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment: MPDB Source Protective Device: CM_LTP_OG14
Equipment Name:

condition.

V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment: N:BE MTR Source Protective Device: CM_LTP_OG4
Equipment Name:

condition.
Shock Hazard when
covers removed
PPE Glove Class 0
V-Rating 1000 VAC
Equipment: N:BHF1 Source Protective Device:
Equipment Name:

condition.

Shock Hazard when
covers removed
PPE Glove Class 0
V-Rating 1000 VAC
Equipment: N:BHF2 Source Protective Device:
Equipment Name:

condition.
V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment: N:CAP1 Source Protective Device: CM_LTP_OG6
Equipment Name:

condition.

V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment: N:CAP2 Source Protective Device: CM_LTP_OG11
Equipment Name:

condition.
Shock Hazard when
covers removed
PPE Glove Class 0
V-Rating 1000 VAC
Equipment: N:RP11 Source Protective Device:
Equipment Name:

condition.

Shock Hazard when
covers removed
PPE Glove Class 0
V-Rating 1000 VAC
Equipment Name:

condition.
Shock Hazard when
covers removed
PPE Glove Class 0
V-Rating 1000 VAC
Equipment Name:

condition.

Shock Hazard when
covers removed
PPE Glove Class 0
V-Rating 1000 VAC
Equipment Name:

condition.
Level B Shock Hazard when
V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment: N:SPARE MTR Source Protective Device: CM_LTP_OG5
Equipment Name:

condition.

V-Rating 1000 VAC
Equipment: N:VFD_BHF Source Protective Device: CTR2_OG2
Equipment Name:

condition.
V-Rating 1000 VAC
Equipment: N:VFD1 Source Protective Device: CTR1_OG2
Equipment Name:

condition.

V-Rating 1000 VAC
Equipment: N:VFD2 Source Protective Device: CTR1_OG4
Equipment Name:

condition.
V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment: SPARE Source Protective Device: CM_LTP_OG3
Equipment Name:

condition.

V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment: SPARE 4 Source Protective Device: CM_LTP_OG12
Equipment Name:

condition.
V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment Name:

condition.

V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment Name:

condition.
V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment: SPARE2 Source Protective Device: CM_LTP_OG7
Equipment Name:

condition.

V-Rating 500 VAC
Equipment: SPARE3 Source Protective Device: CM_LTP_OG8
Equipment Name:

condition.
Sample WorkPermit
PPE ILLUSTRATIONS
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94

Report - Arc Flash27112020

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Report - Arc Flash27112020

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report - Arc Flash27112020

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ultratech Cement Ltd

ARC FLASH STUDY REPORT

1 Revised on customer remarks 27/11/2020 CBR RC CBR

Revision Revision Particulars Date Reviewed Checked Approved

PROJECT ID PCORD /1/2020-21

Sl.No Particulars Page No

Proven designs such as

Incident Energy Analysis Method:

SR: Selection of one in group is required.

a :Arc ratings can be for

4 Protective Equipment Protective Equipment Protective Equipment Protective Equipment

5 Head Hard hat Hard hat Hard hat Hard hat

Faulted Bus Fault Current Trip Device

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Flash Protection Shock Protection 132000 VAC

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Flash Protection Shock Protection 6600 VAC

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Flash Protection Shock Protection 690 VAC

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Flash Protection Shock Protection 690 VAC

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Flash Protection Shock Protection 415 VAC

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Flash Protection Shock Protection 6600 VAC

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Flash Protection Shock Protection 6600 VAC

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Flash Protection Shock Protection 415 VAC

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020

Changes in equipment settings or system configuration will invalidate the

Flash Protection Shock Protection 415 VAC

Contract # Engineer Date 13-11-2020