Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

III.

Labor Standards
A. Coverage/Exclusions
 Art. 82, Labor Code 1. No
 Book III, Rule I, Sec. 2, Implementing Rules (Labor Code) rm
 David v. Macasio, G.R. No. 195466, July 2, 2014 al
 Penaranda v. Baganga Plywood, G.R. No. 159577, May 3, 2006
 PICP v. Laguesma, G.R. No. 101738, April 12, 2000
Hours of Work
 Art. 83, Labor Code a. C
 Book III, Rule 1, Secs. 3-4, Implementing Rules (Labor Code) o
 DO No. 65-04, Series of 2004 m
 R.A. 8972, Sec. 6 p
 R.A. 10361, Secs. 20-21 r
 CHED Memorandum Circular No. 40, Series of 2008 e
s
sed Work Week
 DOLE Dept. Advisory No. 2, Series of 2004 2. Meal break
 DOLE Dept. Advisory Art.
No. 2,
85,Series
LaborofCode
2009
 DOLE Dept. Advisory Book
No. 4,III,
Series
RuleofI,2010
Sec. 7, Implementing Rules (Labor Code)
 R.A. 11165  Letter-Opinion dated Nov. 27, 1989, Sec. Drilon to Kodak Philippines
 DOLE D.O. No. 202,  Series
Manualof on
2019
Labor Standards 2004- Bureau of Working Conditions
 DOLE D.O. No. 184, Series of 2017
 DOLE D.O. No. 178, Series of 2017
 Sime Darby v. NLRC, G.R. No. 119205, April 15, 1998 3.
 Pan Am v. Pan Am Employees, G.R. No. L-16275, February 23, 1961 3.
3.
Waiting Time
 Book III, Rule I, Sec. 5, Implementing Rules (Labor Code) 4. Overtim
 Arica v. NLRC, G.R. No. 78210, February 28, 1998 e
Work/Pay
 Art. 87, Labor Code
 Book III, Rule I, Secs. 8-11, Implementing Rules (Labor Code)
 See Manual on Labor Standards 2004- Bureau of Working Conditions
 Art. 88, Labor Code
 Art. 89, Labor Code
 No. 3, DOLE Handbook on Workers Statutory Monetary Benefits
 Robina Farms v. Villa, G.R. No. 175869, April 18, 2016
 Pigcaulan v. Security and Credit, G.R. No. 173648, January 16, 2012
5. Night Work (R.A. 10151); Night Differential
 R.A. 10151 6.
 GMA Network v. Pabriga, G.R. No. 176419, November 27, 2013 6.
6.
Part-time Work
 PAL v. Pascua, G.R. No. 143258, August 15, 2003
 Perpetual Help Credit v. Faburada, G.R. No. 121948, October 8, 2001
 CIT v. Ople, G.R. No. L-58870, December 18, 1987
 UST v. NLRZ, G.R. No. 85519, February 15, 1990
 Herrera-Manaois v. St. Scholastica’s Collehe, G.R. No. 188914, December 11, 2013
 Lacuesta v. ADMU, G.R. No. 152777, December 9, 2005
 Saint Mary’s University v. C.A., G.R. No. 157788, March 8, 2005
 See DOLE Handbook on Workers Statutory Monetary Benefits
7. Contract for Piece of Work
 Art. 1713, Civil Code B. W
 Dingcong v. Guingona, G.R. No. 76044 June 28, 1988 ag
 Mackay v. Spouses Caswell, G.R. No. 183872, November 17, es
2014

Arts. 97-98, Labor Code


1. Wage v. Salary
 Equitable v. Sadac, G.R. No. 164772, June 8, 2006
 Songco v. NLRC, G.R. Nos. 50999-501000, March 23, 1990
 Reyes v. NLRC, G.R. No. 160233, August 8, 2007
 Sugue v. Triumph International, G.R. No. 164804, January 30, 2009
 International School v. Quisumbing, G.R. No. 128845, June 1, 2000
 Atok-Big Association v. Atok-Big Wedge, G.R. No. L-7349, July 19,
1955
 Our Haus v. Parian, G.R. No. 204651, August 6, 2014
 Book III, Rule VII-A
 DOLE D.O. No. 126-13, April 2013
2. Minimum wage; Minimum wage setting
 Art. 99, Labor Code
 R.A. 6727, Wage Rationalization Act
 R.A. 8188
 Book III, Rule VII, Sec. 1, Implementing Rules (Labor Code)
 NWPC Guidelines No. 1, Series of 2007 (June 19, 2007)
 See Wage Order No. ROVII-20, February 13, 2017
 Employees Confederation v. NWPC, G.R. No. 96169, September 24,
1991
 Nasipit Integrated v. Nasipit Employees, G.R. No. 162411, June 27,
2008
3. Minimum wage of workers paid by results
a. Workers paid by results
 Art. 124, Labor Code b. Appr
 Art. 101, Labor Code entice
 Book III, Rule VII-A, Implementing Rules (Labor s
Code)
 Tan v. Lagman, G.R. No. 151228, August 15, 2002
c. Learners (B&C)
 Arts. 57-60, Labor Code d. P
 Arts. 73-77, Labor Code e
 Book II, Rule VI, Sec. 29, Implementing Rules (Labor rs
Code) o
n
s with disability
 Arts. 78-81, Labor Code e. Employed
 R.A. 7277, Magna Carta for Disabled Fishers
Persons  DOLE D.O.
156-16, Series of 2016
 DOLE D.O. 196, Series of 2018
4. Commissions
 See Songco v. NLRC, G.R. Nos. 50999-501000,  Iran
March 23, 1990 v.
 See Reyes v. NLRC, G.R. No. 160233, August 8,
2007
 Soriano v. NLRC, G.R. No. L-75510, October 27,
1987
NLRC, G.R. No. 121927, April 22, 1998
5. Deductions from wages
 Arts. 113-118, Labor Code 6.
 Book III, Rule VIII, Secs. 10-11, Implementing Rules (Labor 6.
Code) 6.
 DOLE D.O. No. 195, Series of 2018 6.
 Arts. 1706, 1708, Civil Code 6.
 DOLE Labor Advisory No. 11, Series of 2014 6.
 Art. 59, R.A. 6938, Cooperative Code of the Phils. 6.
 Bluer Than Blue v. Esteban, G.R. No. 192582, April 7, 2014 6.
 Nina Jewelry v. Trinidad, G.R. No. 188169, November 28, 2011 6.
 Milan v. NLRC, G.R. No. 202961, February 4, 2015 6.
 SHS Perforated v. Diaz, G.R. No. 185814, October 13, 2010 6.
6.
Non-diminution of benefits
 Art. 97
100,(f),Labor
Labor Code
Code 7. F
 SLL International
Wesleyan v. NLRC,
University G.R.G.R.
v. Faculty, No. No.
172161, March
181806, 2, 12,
March a
2011
2014 c
 Mabeza
Vergara v. NLRC, G.R.G.R.
Coca-Cola, No. No.
118506, AprilApril
176985, 18, 1997
1, 2013 i
 See Our Haus v. Parian, G.R. No. 204651, August 6, 2014
Central Azucarera v. Labor Union, G.R. No. 188949, July 26, 2010 l
 Netlink v. Delmo, G.R. No. 160827, June 18, 2014 i
t
ies v. Supplements

You might also like