Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Modern Hindi Plays
Modern Hindi Plays
Author(s): N. C. Zamindar
Source: Books Abroad , Winter, 1966, Vol. 40, No. 1 (Winter, 1966), pp. 38-39
Published by: Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Books Abroad
Narayan
expertly in The Glass Menagerie? Mishra,
- but it Shreeniwas
was Das, Kishori lal
a stage play actually writtenGoswami,
in 1953 and others
and ap- wrote plays in the style
parently resurrected from of Bhartendu,
a pile taking themes from religious,
of unused
manuscripts in the attic, andhistorical, and social
no evidence subjects, and experiment-
ap-
ing to
peared that it had been adapted with farce. Bhartendu's achievement was
a different
medium. Act I: The drawing room;
great, Act II: his tradition was not
but unfortunately
The gentleman's flat; Act carried forward.
III: Back toThere
thecame about a bifurca-
drawing room. The camera was tion of the drama
almost movement, with the drama-
never
out-of-doors. When he revived this
tists work into
divided the two groups. One wrote
author should have reread itplays
most carefully;
merely as a literary form having little
both he and the New Zealand scene were
relation with the stage, and the other wrote
twelve years older, more sophisticated, and the for the stage. The first group of literary
purely
daughter Winsome on this count wasdramatists
just wrote plays which make good
reading
too bad to be true. She was not just simple, she but are mostly useless for the stage.
appeared slightly mentally deficient. The The
play outstanding figure of this group was
was far too long; judicious cuts reducingJayashankar
the Prasad. His historical plays, writ-
playing time to less than an hour wouldten have
in high-flown style, have only literary ap-
eliminated many of the dull spots, especially
peal. He forgot the vital fact that "the drama-
tist requires a theater." Prasad set a wrong
those in Act I. From a writing and production
tradition for Hindi playwrights by totally
viewpoint, television plays of thirty or forty
minutes are more likely to succeed. ignoring the theater. It can also be argued
that the nonexistence of theater compelled
Stage plays are an obvious source of tele-
vision material, but full-length plays ofPrasad
real to write literary drama. Prasad's Ajat
merit are a rarity in New Zealand, many Shatru
of S\anda gupta and Chandragupta
them being merely inflated one-act plays suited
hope- his grand style.
lessly unable to hold the interest of an audience
Laxminarayan Misra wrote some plays un-
over the longer time. Bruce Mason has demon-der the influence of Ibsen. Sindoor Ki Holt
strated what can be done; it could be the andgene-
his other plays were staged but were not
sis of a flourishing era of television writing.
successful. Practically all important Hindi
Auckland Teachers' Collegeprose writers and some poets tried their hands
at the drama, and all were failures. Govind
Modern Hindi Plays Vallabh Pant's Varmala and other plays were
By N. C. Zamindar unsucessfully enacted. Bechan Sharma Ugra
It can hardly be disputed that all the Indian some realistic plays, but they also did
wrote
not come on the stage successfully.
languages - except Urdu - derive inspiration
for their plays from Bhart Muni's Natya Harikrishna Premi and Dr. Govind Das
are major Hindi playwrights. The latter has
Shastra. The Sanskrit plays were written with
a full knowledge of stagecraft. After the written
Mus- more than fifty plays. Harikrishna
lim invasion in North India, dramatic art Premi's
suf- plays were successfully staged in La-
fered an eclipse. There is no evidence thathore,
the and the plays of Govind Das were staged
Muslim rulers patronized the dramaticinart. Jabalpur, but it cannot be said that the plays
Drama survived in the form of folk art. are popular. Because of the lack of a theater
Perhaps the only Muslim prince interestedand a good dramatic troupe, all these plays re-
in dramatic art was the Nawab of Oudh Wajidmain on the shelf of the library.
Uday Shankar Bhatt and J. C. Mathur
Ali Shah (1821-87). He not only wrote a play
Inder Sabha but formed a troupe and even among the older playwrights have written
acted in it. It must be regarded as the some
firstgood plays. J. C. Mathur 's Konar\ and
Shardiya have been successfully enacted.
attempt to revive the stage in North India.
The father of modern Hindi, Bhartendu Among the younger playwrights Upendra-
nath Ashk, Ramesh Mehta, Laxminarayan
Harishchandra (1850-85), is also the father
of the modern Hindi stage and plays. Lal,
Heand Mohan Rakesh have written stage-
formed a troupe which enacted his plays.worthy plays. Ramesh Mehta has the luck to
Bhartendu and his contemporaries were bein-
backed by a theater in Delhi; his plays
therefore have become popular. Dr. Lai's and
fluenced by the Bengali stage plays. Bengali
Mohan Rakesh's plays have also been success-
in its turn was influenced by English litera-
ture. fully staged. Rakesh's Asadh Ka El Din is a
Bhartendu wrote seven original plays and
really fine play. Based on the life of Kalidas, it
translated seven. His contemporaries, develops
Pratap into a poignant tragedy.