Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IM Group Assignment On Case 3-OLPC
IM Group Assignment On Case 3-OLPC
Prepared By:
Sec.B ID
1. Dawit Asmelash ILI/MBA/15/034/19
2. Gelila Tilahun
3. Robera Wakshum
4. Okelo Fekadu
5. Selamawit Gizachew
6. Fenet Shewalem
August, 2020
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
CASE 3: One Laptop per Child (OLPC)
ONE LAPTOP PER CHILD 2
1. Why are Microsoft, Intel, and other leading for-profit companies interested in low-cost
It depends on two things: Catching the opportunity and Refurbishing their company
image. For catching the opportunities: Vendors should be fully aware of the growing market of
developing countries. Even the consumers may not be able to buy laptops for themselves now.
After decades, those country will be a huge market. Using China for example, the biggest PC
market even didn’t have computer industry 20 years ago. OLPC project is the most cheapest and
efficient way for vendors which enable them to conquer the emerging market with a low cost.
The second reason might be social responsibility and company image. Consumers prefer buying
products from enterprises that are engaged in social causes and associated to a non- ‐profit
project. Showing the developing consumers they are responsibility. They will reach the highest
reputation they ever have in those countries. So as the leading organization Microsoft and Intel
have the social responsibility for the developing countries children and they also see the
In General, from their social responsibility point of view and for the marketing of their
own brand names into people minds they interested in low cost computes for the developing
world.
ONE LAPTOP PER CHILD 3
Yes. I think this is unavoidable and necessary. Microsoft is the monopoly company in
operating system industry. Only if they associate Microsoft and earn their agreements, can they
be able to reality their project easily. Microsoft is the most powerful company in the world and
has the strongest charisma. Coordinate with Microsoft will strengthen the project’s relationship
with other huge vendors, make this project more attractive, and also is helpful to improve their
financial situation. Microsoft can also benefit from the project’s good reputation. This is a win-
win situation.
3. Assess the thinking behind the “give one, get one” promotion. Do you think this is a
Yes, I think it’s good. A good tactic should be engaging and promoting the products
while increase the profit. When referring to this tactic, In November 2007, in an effort to
increase production, OLPC announced the promotion of Give One, Get One. The OLPC team
started this promotion to grab the market attention of their nonprofit ambitious project. Because
prior to the initiatives launch, the OLPC had been a fascinating demonstration of hardware and
software ingenuity, but actual unit sales and donations had been far smaller than originally
predicted.
Though the tactic of Give One, Get One is aggressive marketing strategies in order to
gain market share and capitalize on its competitive strengths. Though the aggressive marketing
tactic like Give one, Get One always not good for the all types of products. But the OLPC project
had strong competent like Intel Classmate. So to grab the attention of mass people and gain
maximum market share and achieve the goal of developing country’s poor children education
this marketing tactic was good for the project. Because OLPC announced two weeks give one get
ONE LAPTOP PER CHILD 4
one promotion first but for its huge response to the markets they increased their promotional
offer time.
References
Web. (2013) "One Laptop per Child." One Laptop per Child (OLPC): Mission
Naughton, John. (2013) "The $100 Laptop Question." The Observer. Guardian News and
Media.