Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Emma Martinez - Reading Practical Research Planning and Design Chapter 1 2 P
Emma Martinez - Reading Practical Research Planning and Design Chapter 1 2 P
**This is intended to be exposure to the resources available to you. This entire text is helpful for many parts of the research
process. So, while we may not be reading all of it, it is always available to you! Pro-tip, the detailed table of contents and section
headers are hyperlinked**
As you read, note helpful sections in the boxes below and answer the questions for each section.
What IS Research?
Research is analyzing and processing data in order to further understand a topic that we may be interested in
- Beginning with a problem
- Creates a goal
- Divides the problem into small sections to better articulate
Using the research cycle, what step of the process is NEXT for you?
In the research process, based on the research cycle the next place for me to begin is honestly number one. I have a
really good idea of what my question may look like, but no pencil to paper yet.
Which part of that step do you think will be the most challenging? Why?
In the research cycle, I think that the hardest step for me will be number 5 - a plan to address/answer the question. I
don’t want to have people fill out a survey, but rather use research from other professionals in order to create a better
understanding of my question, along with some of my own research.
Qualitative: Looking at the characteristics of data/variable. Look at the complexities of the thing and it cannot be
researched or described in a numerical way and most likely has to involve humans in order to conduct some sort of
research.
After reading about the philosophical assumptions underlying research methodologies, which do you believe yourself
to be? (Positivist, Pospositivist, or Constructivist) Why?
I think that I am more of a positivist when it comes to research. I believe that with the right research and in a good
orderly fashion, research can be correctly conducted and identified. While I’m aware that some questions are just
unanswerable, I believe that with today’s technology and advancements, any research question can be moderately or
even fully understood through extensive research.
At this point, do you see yourself as more likely to participate in basic research or applied research? Why?
I think that my topic can most likely be put into basic research. It’s not something that can be specifically applied to
something at the moment, but it’s good and useful information that may be beneficial in the future.
Which of Leedy’s four situations to avoid when considering problems to research do you feel presents the biggest
potential trap? (In other words, which one do you think could be easy to fall into and/or hardest to distinguish your
research from?)
I think that in my case number one - research projects should not be simply a ruse for achieving self-enlightenment -
This is something that could potentially become a future problem because it is a topic that I am generally curious
about learning about and something that could potentially benefit me. I think that this motive or desire to know could
be an issue as a research.
Which strategy or strategies for choosing an appropriate problem have you participated in and which do you think
could be a good use of your time over the next few weeks?
Some of the strategies I have participated in include finding a topic that intrigues/motivates me and a topic that others
could possibly relate to/find interesting. Some of the strategies that I think could be a good use of my time include
being realistic about what I want to accomplish. I need to really figure out what exactly my end goal of this project is
going to be and most importantly how I choose to do so.
CREATE AND EVALUATE A RESEARCH PROBLEM BASED ON YOUR INTEREST AREA AT THE MOMENT:
For this exercise, use the guidelines on pages 50-53