Галібей Тетяни мСОУМа-12

Lord of the Flies

by William Golding
COMPREHENSION
1.
Describing all text – YES. But, lines 2-3 show us that Jack doesn’t express any
remorse at having let the fire go out.
2.
He said: “We had to have them in the hunt or there wouldn’t have been enough for a
ring” (line 18-19)
3.
Jack wants to share with Ralph emotion of happiness.
4.
Piggy began to cry out, shrilly (line 41)
5.
Jack is guilty. He go off hunting and let out the fire. (51-52)
6.
He go off hunting and let out the fire. And Piggy’s words “ You didn’t ought to have
let the fire out” (line 63)
7.
Piggy was crying because Ralph made a step forward and Jack smacked. Piggy’s
glasses flew off and tinkled on the rocks. (line 72-73)
8.
Simon
9.
He had a bad vision. And when Jack hit Piggy, his glasses flew off and one side was
broken. And he couldn’t see good. That is he only got one eye.
ANALYSIS
1.
a. Yes. (lines 37-39)
b. It adds greater impact to Ralph’s accusation.
“You let the fire out.” (lines 1, 14, 37, 46)
To show tension, to intensify feelings, to show that Jack is guilty, and must repent.
“you shouldn’t have seen it” (lines 12, 29)
I also noticed repetition “We can light the fire again.” (lines 4, 21)
c.
To my mind, in the beginning of the passage.
2.
a. Exhilarated. Confused. Satisfied. Happy.
b. Shuddening or shaking.
c. Maybe when we quench our thirst, we feel pleasure, enjoyment, and when Jack
killed a pig, he feels his masculine ability to be a miner, and gets pleasure and
pride from it.
3.
a. It is more direct.
b. It is possible that it the glasses are broken, do not glue them back already, do
not repair, and this applies to other gross errors that cannot be corrected.