English for lawyers – test No’ 1 (15/12/2020)

Name: Mahmud Auinat

ID No’: 025914771

1. The doctrine of vicarious liability.

2. Because it operates as strict or no-fault liability.
3. False, when the wrongdoer be acting as a servant or employee, and that the wrong done be
connected to the employee's course of employment.

4. TO SHOW THAT THE employee acted “on a frolic of his own,” or in other words, if the
employee acted in a way that was unconnected with his employment. And didn’t committed
“within the course of employment.”
5. The law of torts
6. in the course of employment
7. employee employed under a contract of service and independent contractor under
contarct for service.

8. True , because its immaterial if the wrong committed by the employee was authorised or
not.

9. vicarious liability when there is a connection with the “course of employment.”

10. by statute
11. the case of Majrowski v. Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Trust, This circumstance would
potentially arise in the context of harassment within the workplace, where one employee
has been harassed or bullied by another

12. To allow the employer to claim a contribution from the employee under the Civil Liability.
13. "this criteria" referring to “in the course of employment”