Professional Documents
Culture Documents
M2R2 Review of The Book - The System of Professions An Essay On The Division of Expert Labor
M2R2 Review of The Book - The System of Professions An Essay On The Division of Expert Labor
DigitalCommons@ILR
6-1990
Part of the Labor Relations Commons, and the Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons
Thank you for downloading an article from DigitalCommons@ILR.
Support this valuable resource today!
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the ILR Collection at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been
accepted for inclusion in Articles and Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more
information, please contact catherwood-dig@cornell.edu.
If you have a disability and are having trouble accessing information on this website or need materials in an
alternate format, contact web-accessibility@cornell.edu for assistance.
[Review of the book The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of
Expert Labor]
Abstract
[Excerpt] In The System of Professions, Abbott directly confronts these important and long-neglected
issues in an original and highly thought-provoking approach to the analysis of professions. Focusing on
the dynamics through which occupations define their jurisdiction, or the right to control the provision of
particular services and activities, this approach draws attention to one of the most critical determinants
of jurisdiction, interprofessional competition. Based on an astoundingly wide, cross-cultural knowledge of
the histories of a variety of occupations, Abbott provides a rich and complex analysis of the nature of
relationships among professional occupations and the forces that shape these relationships over time.
Keywords
professions, jurisdiction, competition, relationships
Disciplines
Labor Relations | Organizational Behavior and Theory
Comments
Suggested Citation
Tolbert, P. S. (1990). [Review of the book The system of professions: An essay on the division of labor]
[Electronic version]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 410-413.
Zur Shapira
Visiting Scholar
Russell Sage Foundation
1 12 E. 64th Street
New York, NY 10021
and
Department of Management
Stern School of Business
New York University
New York, NY 10003
REFERENCES
Bazerman, Max H. Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic, March,James G., and HerbertA.
1986 Judgmentin ManagerialDeci- and Amos Tversky (eds.) Simon
sion Making.New York:Wiley. 1982 Judgment under Uncertainty: 1958 Organizations.New York:
Bernoulli, Daniel
Heuristics and Biases. New Wiley.
York: Cambridge University
1738 "Specimentheoriaenovae de Meehl, Paul E.
Press.
mensurasortis."Commentarri 1954 Clinicalversus StatisticalPre-
academiaescientiarumimpe- Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos diction:A TheoreticalAnalysis
rialespetropolitanae,5: Tversky and a Review of the Evidence.
175-192. 1979 "Prospect theory: An analysis Minneapolis,MN: University
of decision under risk." Eco- of MinnesotaPress.
Cyert, RichardM., and James G. nometrica, 47: 263-291.
March Simon, HerbertA.
1963 A BehavioralTheoryof the Keeney, Ralph L., and Howard 1947 AdministrativeBehavior.New
Firm.EnglewoodCliffs,NJ: Raiffa York:Free Press.
Prentice-Hall. 1976 Decisions with Multiple Objec-
Tversky,Amos, and Daniel
tives. New York: Wiley.
Edwards,Ward Kahneman
1954 "Thetheoryof decision MacCrimmon, Kenneth R., and 1981 "Theframingof decisions and
making."PsychologicalBul- Donald A. Wehrung the psychologyof choice."
letin, 51: 380-417. 1986 Taking Risk: The Management Science, 211: 453-458.
of Uncertainty. New York: Free
Elster,Jon (ed.) Ungson, GerardoR., and Daniel N.
Press.
1986 The MultipleSelf. New York: Braunstein (eds.)
CambridgeUniversityPress. March, James G. 1982 DecisionMaking:An Interdis-
1988 Decisions and Organizations. ciplinaryInquiry.Boston: Kent.
Kahneman, Daniel Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
1982 "Bureaucracies,mindsand the Von Neumann, John, and Oscar
humanengineeringof deci- March, James G., and Zur Shapira Morgenstern
sions." InGerardoUngsonand 1982 "Behavioral decision theory 1944 Theoryof Games and Eco-
DanielBraunstein(eds.), Deci- and organizational decision nomic Behavior.Princeton,NJ:
sion Making:An Interdisci- theory." In Gerardo Ungson PrincetonUniversityPress.
plinaryInquiry:121-125. and Daniel Braunstein (eds.), Von Winterfeldt,Detlof, and Ward
Boston: Kent. Decision Making: An Interdis-
Edwards
ciplinary Inquiry:92-115. 1986 DecisionAnalysisand Behav-
Boston: Kent.
ioralResearch.New York:
1987 "Managerial perspectives on
CambridgeUniversityPress.
risk and risk taking." Manage-
ment Science, 33: 1404-1418.