The National Archive of CJ Data 1991 PDF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 231

If you -

have
-issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov.
--.--~------ -----

Data Collections

Available From

The National Archive of


Criminal Justice Data

1 f~CJRS
't
J." UUL 14 1992
-i
f

Update: Summer 1991


This document describes data collections that have beon processed and
archived by the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data within the
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, These
resources have been developed under a cooperative agreement with tho
Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
137150
U.S. Department of Justice
National Institute of Jusllce
This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the
person or organization originating It. Points of view or opinions stated
in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily
represent the official posltlon or policies of the National Institute of
Justice.

Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material in mi-


crofiche only has bElen granted by
ICPSR/BJS
U.s. Department of Justice
to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS).

Further reproduction outside of the NC.JRS system requires permis-


sion of the copyright owner.
The National Archive
of Criminal Justice Data

Sponsored by the Bureau af Justice Statistics ulty. staff. and students at member schools to
(BJS) In the U.S. Department of Justice, the take advantage of the full range of /CPSR
National Archive of Criminal Justice Data was sElfVices. Because ICPSR Is structured as a
established In 1978 under the auspices of the "partnership' with Its member Institutions, it Is
Inter-university Consortium for Political and able to provide facilities and services to reo
Social Research (ICPSR). Headquarters of searchers and scholars that no one college or
the Criminal Justice Archive are located, along university could offer independently. Most
with the central staff of ICPSR, in the Institute ICPSR services are provided at no charge to
for Social Research at the University of Michigan. the Individual user.

The central mission of the Criminal Justice Ar- Each member institution designates one per-
chive Is to facilitate and encourage research son on campus to serve as the "ICPSR Offi-
in the field of criminal justice through the shar- cial Representative" (OR). The OR functions
ing of data resources. Specific goals inciude: as a liaison between ICPSR and the member
school and can answer questions about data
• Providing computer-readable data for the already on campus and arrange for local us-
quantitative study of crime and the crimi- ers to obtain access to data housed at ICPSR.
nal justice system through the develop-
ment of a central data archive that dis-
seminates computer-readable data
• Supplying technical assistance in select· How to Order Data
Ing data collections and the computer
hardware and software for analyzing data Individuals at member institutions can order
efficiently and effectiveiy data through their campus ORs. Individuals at
• Offering training In quantitative methods of nonmember Institutions may obtain ICPSR
social science research to facilitate secon- data by paying an access fee. The Bureau of
dary analysis of criminal jLlstice data Justice Statistics supports the utilization of
criminal justice data by individuals working in
government or under grants from the Depart-
ment of Justice.
Inter-university Consortium for
Users at nonmember institutions or In govern-
Political and Social Research ment agencies wishing to order criminal jus-
tice-related data collections should contact
Since 1962, ICPSR has served the academic Criminal Justice Archive staff members di·
community by acquiring, processing, and dis- rectly. Individuals at member schools can
tributing data relevant to a broad spectrum of also contact staff regarding substantive and
academic disciplines Including criminology, technical issues. Call or write to:
political science, sociology, law, history, eco-
nomics, gerontology, public health, and educa- National Archive
tion. The Consortium maintains the world's larg- of Criminal Justice Data
est repository of computer-based research and ICPSR
instructional data for the social sciences. Institute for Social Research
P.O. Box 1248
ICPSR is a membership-based organization Ann Arbor. MI48106
with over 350 member colleges and universi-
ties in the United States and abroad. Pay- 80Q-999-0960
ment of an annual institutional fee entitles fac- 313-763-5010

Introduction iii
Using the catalog
-
This catalog Includes descriptions of the data readable codebook (which may be edited and
collections relevant to research on criminal updated as required by further processing), a
Justice. Collections are organized by topic. multllithed draft version, or a photocopy of the
Study descriptions Include a brief outline of Investigator's codebook. My peculiarities In
the substantive content of the collection as the data will be Indicated irl the documenta-
well as the number and length of records In tion. A copy of the documentation will be sup-
the data IlIe(s). plied When the data are requested.

As part of each study description, a ·class Class III studies have been checked by the
designation" is given which Indicates the level ICPSR staff for the appropriate number of
of ICPSR processing conducted. This classifi- cards per case and accurate data locations
cation scheme Is not an Indicator of the sub- as specified by the investigator's codebook.
stantive quality of the data, nor does It always Often frequency checks on these data have
correspond to any given level of technical been made. Known data discrepancies and
data quality. other problems, If any, will be communicated
to the user at the time the data are requested.
Data are usually made available In two One copy of the codebook for these data will
stages: first, in the technical condition In be supplied when the data are requested.
Which they are received (Class IV). and later, The data themselves usually exist only In
after the completion of processing, the nature card Image form.
of Which Is determined by external advisory
committees and the ICPSR staff (Class lor Class IV studies are distributed In the form re-
II). In this way, an attempt Is made to provide ceived by ICPSR from the originallnvestlga-
reasonably quick access to data as they are tcr. Users of Class IV data should keep sev-
released by the pr;nclpallnvestigator and also eral considerations In mind. Problems may
to redlsseminate the data after additional exist which would not be known before proc-
work has been performed on the data and essing begins, and thus ICPSR can take no
documentation. responsibility for the technical condition of the
data The requestor, therefere, must be pre-
Class I datasets have been checked, corrected pared to accept some uncertalnty as to the
if necessary, and formatted to ICPSR specifica- condition of the data Requests for these stud-
tions. Also, the data may have been reccxied ies will normally require a longer time to com-
and reorganized in consultation with thf;llnvesti- plete than more fully processed studies. In
gator to maximize their utilization and accessi- addition, staff assistance on problems en-
bility. A ccxiebook, often capable of being read countered in the use of Class IV data will be
by a computer, is available. This ccxiebook fully limited. This policy is Intended to ensure that
documoots the data and may include descrip- staff resources are maximized while at the
tive statistics such as frequencies or means. same time not preventing early access to
For those Class I datasets thai have ccxis- data for those who must have them as soon
books available In printed form, a copy of the as possible. The documentation for Class IV
printed ccxiebook Is supplied routinely to seeh studies is reproduced from the material origi-
ICPSR Official Representative. All Class I stud- nally received. One copy of the documenta-
Ies E¥'e available on magnetic tape In either tion will be supplied upon request from the Of-
card Image or OSIRIS format. ficial Representative.

Class II studies have been checked and for- Data collections Included In this catalog repre-
matted to ICPSR standards. All nonnumeric sent only a partial listing of the holdings of
codes have been removed. The studies in ICPSR. Users are strongly urged to consult
this class are available on magnetic tape in the ICPSR Guide to Resources and Serv-
either OSIRIS or card Image format. The ices for a complete listing of the archive's
documentation exists as either a machine- data collections.

Introduction v
Contents

Ust of data collections ix

I. Attitude surveys 1

II. Community studies 17

Ill. Corrections - adult 27

IV. Corrections - juvenile 59

V. Court case processing 65

VI. Courts 91

VII. Criminal justice system 109

VIII. Delinquency 121

IX. Govemmental response to crime 141

X. Illegal corporate behavior 143

XI. Official statistics 147

XII. Police 167

XIII. Victimization 187

Index of principal investigators 211

Introduction vii
List of data collections

Attitude surveys 1 CBS News


CBS News "48 Hours" gun poU, March
1989
Bureau of Justice Statistics, (ICPSR 9233) . • • • • • • . • . • . • • • 4
U.S. Department of Justice
National crime surveys: ClUes attitude CBS News/The New York Times
sub-sample, 1972·1975 CBS News/New York Times abortion poll,
(ICPSR 7663) . • . . • • . • • • . • . • . i July 1989
(ICPSR 9488) • • . . . • . . • . • • . . • 5
ABC News
ABC News "Nightline" drugs and alcohol CBS News/The New York Times
poll,August1988 CBS News/New York Times abortion polls,
(ICPSR 9180) . • . . . • . . • • • . . . • 1 September-October 1989
(ICPSR 9491) . . . . . . . • • • • . • . . 5
ABC News
ABC News poll of public opinion on crime, CBS News/The New York Times
December 1982 CBS News/ New York Times drug poll,
(ICPSR 8100) • • • • . • • • • • • . . . . 2 September 1989
(ICPSR 9489) . • • • . . • • • • • • • . • 6
ABC News/Washington Post
ABC News/Washington Post poll, January CBS News/The New York Times
1990 CBS News/New York Times monthly poll,
(ICPSR 9436) . . . . . . • . . . . . .•. 2 March·April1990
(ICPSR 9498) . • • • . . • • • • . . • • . 7
ABC News/Washington Post
ABC News/Washington Post poll, Center for Urban Affalrs and Policy Research
February 1990 Reactions to crime project, 1977 [Chicago,
(ICPSR 9438) . . . . . . • . . . • . . • . 2 Philadelphia, San Francisco]: Survey on
fear of crime and citizen behavior
ABC News/Washington Post (ICPSR 8162) • . • . . • . . • . • • . . . 7
ABC News/Washington Post Souter
nomination poll, July 1990 Davis, James A.
(ICPSR 9402) . . . . • . . . . . . . ••. 3 General social survey, 1972
(ICPSR 7309) . • • • • . • • • • • • . • • 8
American Political Science Association!
Wesley G. Skogan and William Klecka Davis, James A.
Setups: American politics: Fear of crime General social survey, 1973
(ICPSR 7368) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 (ICPSR 7315) • • . . . . . . . . . . . • . 8
Blumenthal, Monica D., Robert L Kahn, and Davis, James A.
Frank M. Andrews General social survey, 1974
ICPSR instructional subset: Justifying (ICPSR 7341) • . . . . . • . . . . . . . . 8
violence: Attitudes of American meli, 1969
(ICPSR 7517) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Davis, James A.
General social survey, 1975
Blumenthal, Monica D., Robert L Kahn, and (ICPSR 7367) • . . . • . . • • . . • . • • 8
Frank M. Andrews
Justifying violence: Attitudes of American Davis, James A. and Tom W. Smith
men, 1969 General social surveys, 1972-1986:
(ICPSR 3504) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 [Cumulative file]
(ICPSR 8609) • . • • • • • . . • • • . . . 9

List of data collections ix


Davis, James A. and Tom W. Smith WCBS-TV News/The New York Times
General social surveys, 1972·1987: WCBS·TV News!New York Times race
[Cumulative file] relations poll, June 1990
(ICPSR 8865) ••••••••••••••• 9 (ICPSR 9502) ••••••••••••••• 14
Davis, James A. and Tom W. Smith Washington Post
General social surveys, 1972·1988: Washington Post Mayor Barry poll,
[Cumulative file] January 1990
{ICPSR 8990} •.••••••••.•.• 10 (ICPSR 9437) . . . . • . • . . • . • . • . 15

Davis, James A. and Tom W. Smith Washington Post


General social surveys, 1972·1989: Washington Post Mayor Barry verdict poll,
[Cumulative file] August 1990
{ICPSR 9275} ••.•••••.•.•.• 10 (lCPSR 9555) ••••.•••.•••.•• 15
Lavrakas, Paul J. and Wesley G. Skogan
Citizen participation and community crime
prevention, 1979: Chicago metropolitan Community studies 17
area survey
(lCPSR 8086) . • . • • • • . . . • . • . 11 American Institutes for Research
National evaluation of the community
Mendelsohn, Harold and Garrett J. O'Keefe anti-crime program, 1979-1981
Media crime prevention campaign in the (lCPSR 8704) . • . . . . . . . • • . . . .17
United States, 1980
(ICPSR 8050) • • . • . . . • . . . • . • 11 Fowla-, Floyd J.
Residential neighborhood crime control
National Opinion Research Center project: Hartford, Connecticut, 1973,
General social survey, 1976 1975-1977,1979
(ICPSR 7398) . • . . • . • . • • • • • . 12 (ICPSR 7682) • . . . . • • • . . . . • • • 17
National Opinion Research Center Greenberg, Stephanie
General social survey, 1977 Characteristics of high and low crime
(ICPSR 7573) . • • • . • . . . • . • . • 12 neighborhoods in Atlanta, 1980
(ICPSR 7951) •.•.••••••••••. 18
The New York Times
New York Times race relations survey, Kobrin, Solomon and Leo A. Schuerman
March 1987: New York City Interaction between neighborhood change
(ICPSR 9214) . . • • . • . . • • • • • . 12 and criminal activity, 1979
(ICPSR 9056) , . . • . • . • • • . • . • • 18
Richardson, Richard, et al.
Public attitudes toward the criminal Loftin, Colin
justice system and criminal victimization Detroit area study, 1979: A study of
in North Carolina, 1971 metropolitan issues
(ICPSR 7670) . . • • . . • . . . . . • • 13 (ICPSR 9301) . • . • . • • . . • . . . . . 19
little, Charles R. McPherson, Marlys, Glenn Silloway, and
Public attitudes toward deviant behavior, David Frey
1972: Iowa, New Jersey, and Oregon Crime, fear, and control in neighborhood
(ICPSR 8480) . • . . . • • . • • • . • . 13 commercial centers: Minneapolis and st.
Paul,1970·1982
WABC-TVlNf!w York Daily News (ICPSR8167) . • . . . . . . . . . • . . • 19
WABC·TVINew York Daily News race
relations poll, January 1988 Milder, N. David
(ICPSR 9187) • • . . • . . . • . . . • • 13 Downtown safety, security, and
development in New York City, 1984
WCBS-TV News/The New York Times (ICPSR 9326) • • • • . . . • . . . . • . . 20
WCBS·TV NewslNew York Times race
relations poll, June 1988 Milkman, Raymond H.
(ICPSR 9106) • • . • . . . • • . • . • . 14 Employment services for ex-offenders,
1981·1984: Boston, Chicago, and San
Diego
(iCPSR 8619) . . . . . . • . • . . • • . • 20

x National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Minnesota Criminal Justice system Driving Bureau of Justice Statistics,
While Intoxicated Task Force U.S. Department of JUstice
Recidivism among convicted drunk Capital punishment In the United States,
drivers: Minnesota, 1982 1973·1988
(ICPSR 8601) •••••••••••••• 21 (ICPSR 9337) ••••••••••••••• 27

Nurco, David Bureau of Justice Statistics,


Criminality among narcotic addicts In U.S. Department of JUstice
Baltimore: The role of nonnarcotic drugs, Capital punishment in the United States,
1973-1978 1973·1989
(lCPSR 8604) •••••.•••••.•• 21 (ICPSR 9507) ••••••••••••••• 28

Pennell, Susan, Christine Curtis, and Joel Bureau of Justice Statistics,


Henderson U.S. Department of Justice
Guardian angels: Citizen response to Census of state adult correctional
crime in selected cities of the United facilities, 1979
states, 1984 (ICPSR 7852) . • • • • • • • • • •. 29
(ICPSR 8935) •••••••••••••• 22
Bureau of Justice Statfstlcs,
Rodgers, Willard L., Robert W. Marans, et aI. U.S. Department of Justice
Quality of life in the Detroit metropolitan Census of state adult correctional
area, 1975 facilities, 1984
(ICPSR 7986) •••.••••••.• •• 23 (ICPSR 8444) . • • • . • • • • • .29

Shannon, Lyle W. Bureau of Justice Statistics,


Sanctions In the justice system, U.S. Department of Justice
1942·1977: The effects on offenders in Historical statistics on prisoners in state
Racine, Wisconsin and federal institutions, yearend
(ICPSR 8530) ••••••.••.•• •• 23 1925·1986: {United States]
(ICPSR 8912) ••.•••.•••••••• 29
Skogan, Wesley G.
Disorder and community decline in 40 Bureau of Justice Statistics,
neighborhoods of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice
1977·1983 National corrections reporting program,
(ICPSR 8944) •••••••••••••• 24 1983: [United States]
(ICPSR 8363) • • • • • • • • • • . • . •• 30
Spelman, William
Reactions to crime in Atlanta and Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Chicago,1979·1980 U.S. Department of Justice
(ICPSR 8215) •••••••••••••• 25 National corrections reporting program,
1984: [United States]
Taub, Richard and D. Garth Taylor (ICPSR 8497) ••••••••••••••• 30
Crime factors and neighborhood decline
in Chicago, 1979 Bureau of Justice Statistics,
(ICPSR 7952) •••••••••.••.• 25 U.S. Department of Justice
National corrections reporting program,
Thompson, James W. 1985: [United States]
Relationships between employment and (ICPSR 8918) •••••••••••.••• 31
crime: A survey of Brooklyn residents,
1979·1980 Bureau of Justice Statistics,
(iCPSR 8649) .••••••••••••• 25 U.S. Department of Justice
National jail census, 1970
(ICPSR 7641} •••••.••••••••• 32
Corrections - adult 27 Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice
Bureau of Justice Statistics, National jail census. 1972
U.S. Department at Justice (ICPSR 7638} • • . • • • • • • • • • • . .32
Capital punishment in the United States,
1973-1987
(ICPSR 9210) •••••••••••••• 27

List of data collections xi


Bureau of Justlce Statistics, Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Justice
National jail census, 1978 Survey of Inmates of state correctional
(ICPSR 7737) ••••••..•••.•• 32 facilities, 1979
(ICPSR 7856) ••••••••••••••• 3$
BureaU of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics,
National jail census, 1983 U.S. Department of Justice
(ICPSR 8203) •••••••••••••• 32 Survey of inmates of state correctional
facilities, 1986: [United States]
Bureau of Justice Statistics, (ICPSR 8711) ••••••••••••••• 37
U.S. Department of Justice
National jail census, 1988 Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department
(ICPSR 9256) •••••••••••••• 33 of Justice
Surl/ey of Inmatos of state correctional
Bureau of Justice Statistics, facilities and cenSU$ of state adult
U.S. Department of Justice correctional facilities, 1974
National survey of jails: Jurisdiction· (ICPSR 7811) ••••••••••••••• 37
level and jail·level data, 1985
(lCPSR 8687) ••••••••••• • 33 Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice
l3ureau of Justice Statistics, Survey of jail inmates, 1972
U.S. Department of Justice (ICPSR 7668) ••••••••••••••• 38
National survey of jails: Jurisdiction·
level and lall·level data, 1986 Bureau of Justice Statistics,
(iCPSR 8871) •••••••••••••• 34 U.S. Department of Justice
Survey of jail inmates, 1978
Bureau of Justice Statistics, (ICPSR 7751) ••••••••••••••• 38
U.S. Department of Justice
National survey of Jails: Jurisdiction· Bureau of Justice Statistics,
level data, 1987 U.S. Department of Justice and
(lCPSR 9074) •••••••••••••• 34 Inter-university Consortium tor Political and
Social Research
Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department Raell of prisoners admitted to state and
of Justice federal institutions in the United States,
National survey of jails: Jurisdiction· 1926·1986
level data, 1989 (ICPSR 9165) ••••••••••••••• 38
(ICPSR 9373) •••••••••••.•• 35
Abt Associates, Inc.
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Survey of American prisons and JailS,
U.S. Department of Justice 1979
Recidivism among released prisoners, (ICPSR 7899) • • • • • • • • • • ••••• 39
1983: [United States]
(ICPSR 8875) •••••••••••••• 35 Apao, William K.
Improving prison classification
Bureau of Justice Statistics, procedures in Vermont: Applying an
U.S. Department of Justice interaction model, 1983·1985
Recidivism among young parolees: A (ICPSR 8933) ••••••••.•••••• 39
study of inmates released from prison in
22 states, 1978 Austin, James
(ICPSR B673} •••••••••••••• 35 Prison crowding and forced releases in
Illinois, 1979·1982
Bureau of Justice Statistics, (ICPSR 8921) ••.•••••••••••• 40
U.S. Department of Justice
Survey of inmates of local jails, 1983: Austin, James and Barry Krisberg
[United States] Differential use of jail confinement In San
(ICPSR 8274) •••••••••••••• 36 Francisco, Los Angeles, and Yolo
counties, 1981
(ICPSR 8920) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .40

xii National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Austin, James and Barry Krlsberg Mande, Mary J.
Supervised pretrial release programs, Validation of the Rand selective
1979·1982: Miami, Milwaukee, and Portland incapacitation survey and the Iowa risk
(lCPSR8919) •••••••••••.•• 41 assessment scale in Colorado, 1982 and
1986
Bell, Raymond, et al. (ICPSR 9292) ••••••••••••••• 50
Learning deficiencies among adult
inmates, 1982: Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Manpower Demonstration Research
and Washington Corporation
(ICPSR 8359) •••••••••••••• 43 National supported work evaluation study.
1975·1979: Public use files
Blumstein, Alfred and Jacqueline Cohen (ICPSR 7865) ••••••••••••••• 50
Adult criminal careers In New York,
1972·1983 Marsden, Mary Ellen and Thomas Orsagh
(lCPSR 9353) •••••••••••••• 43 Matching treatment and offender: North
Carolina. 1980·1982
Bradshaw, Richard Alfred (ICPSR 8515) ••••••••••••••• 51
Cross·validatlon of the Iowa offender risk
assessment model In Michigan, 1980·1982 Messinger, Sheldon
(lCPSR 9236) •••••••••••••• 43 Characteristics and movement of felons in
California prisons, 1945·1964
Goodstein, Lynne, John H. Kramer, John R. (ICPSR 7971) ••••••••••••••• 51
Hepburn, and Doris L. MacKenzie
Effects of determinant sentencing on Nurco, David
institutional climate and prison Crime days precursors study: Baltimore,
administration: Connecticut, Minnesota, 1952·1976
illinois, 1981·1983 (ICPSR 8222) ••••••••••••••• 52
(ICPSR 8278) •••••••••••• •• 44
Palumbo, Dennis J., Michael Musheno, and
Harper, Dean Steven Maynard·Moody
Crime and mental disorder, 1972 Implementation of community corrections
(ICPSR 9088) ••••••••••• • 44 in Oregon, Colorado, and Connecticut,
[1981]
Hartigan, Richard (ICPSR 8407) ••••••••••••••• 52
Cost effectiveness of mlsdemeni1ant
probation in Hamilton County, Ohio, Pearson, Frank S.
1981·'1982 Intensive supervision program in New
(ICPSR 8259) •••.••••••• • 45 Jersey, 1983·1986
(ICPSR 9291) ••••••••••••••• 52
Holeman, Herbert and Barbara J.
Krepps·Hess Peterson, Mark A., Suzanne Polich, and Jan
Women correctional officers in California, Michael Chalken
1979 Survey of California prison Inmates. 1976
(ICPSR 8684) •••••••••••••• 46 (lCPSR 7797) •••••••.••••••• 53
Lattimore, Pamela K. Prentky, Robert and Raymond Knight
Sandhills [North Carolina] vocational Dangerous sex offenders: Classifying,
delivery system evaluation project, predicting, and evaluating outcomes of
1983-1987 clinical treatment in Bridgewater,
(ICPSR 9224) .••••••••••••. 47 Massachusetts, 1982·1985
(ICPSR 8985) •.••••••••••••• 53
Los Angeles District Attorney's Office
Operation hardcore [crime] evaiuation: Rafter, Nicole Hahn
Los Angeles, 1976·1980 Women in prison, 1800·1935: Tennessee,
(ICPSR 9038) ••••••..•••••• 48 New York, and Ohio
(ICPSR 8481) ••••••••••••••• 54
McCartI"¥, Jack, D. Randall Smith, and
William R. Smith The Rand Corporation
Effects of sentences on subsequent Effects of prison versus probation in
criminal behavior in New Jersey, 1976·1977 California, 1980·1982
(ICPSR 8986) ••••••••.••••• 49 (ICPSR 8700) ••••••••••••••• 54

List of data collections xiii


The Rand Corporation Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Survay of jail and prison Inmates, 1978 U.S. Department of Justice
(ICPSR 8169) •••••••••••••• 55 Survey of youths In custody, 1987: [United
States]
Aomm, Joseph (ICPSR 8992) ••••••••••••• , .60
Evaluation of Intensive probation in
Milwaukee, 1980-1981 Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
(ICPSR 8276) •••••••••••••• 56 Prevention,
U.S. Department of Justice
Rossi, Peter Juvenile detention and correctional
Transitional aid research project (TARP), facility census, 1977
1976-1977 (ICPSR 7758) ••••••••••••••• 61
(ICPSR 7874) •••••••• •••••• 66
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Schmidt, Peter and Ann D. Witte Prevention,
Predicting recidivism In North Carolina, U.S. Department of Jusllce
1978 and 1980 Juvenile detention and corre.ctlonal
(ICPSR 8987) •••••••••••••• 66 facility census, 1979
(ICPSR 7845) •••••••.••••••• 61
Snortum, John
Drinking and driving: A survey of licensed Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
drivers In the United States, 1983 Prevention,
(ICPSR 8356) •••••••••••••• 57 U.S. Department of Justice
Juvenile detention and correctlonal
Wright, James and Peter Rossi facility census, 1982·1983
Armed criminals In America: A survey of (ICPSR 8205) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .61
Incarcerated felons, 1983
(ICPSR 8357) •••••••••••••• 58 OHico of Juvenile Justice and Dellnql~ency
Prevention and Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Wright, Kevin U.S. Department of Justice
Improving correctional classification, New Juvenile detention and correctional
York,1981·1983 facility census, 1984-1985
(ICPSR 8437) •••••••••••••. 58 (ICPSR 8495) •••.••••••••••• 62
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention,
Corrections - juvenile 59 U.S, Department of Justice
Juvenile detention and correctional
Bureau of Justice Statistics, facility census, 1986·1987: Public facilities
U.S. Department of Justlce (ICPSR 8973) •••••••••.•.••• 62
Juvenile detention and correctional
facility census, 1971 Office of JUVenile Justice and Delinquency
(ICPSR 7637) ••••••••••.••• 59 Prevention,
U.S. Department of Justice
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Juvenile detention and correctional
U.S. Department of Justice facility census, 1988·1989: Public facilities
JUvenile detention and correctional (ICPSR 9445) ••••.•••••••••• 63
facility census, 1973
(ICPSR 7639) •••••••••••••• 59
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Court case processing 65
U.S. Department of Justice
Juvenile detention and correctional Bureau of Justice Statistics,
facility census, 1974 U.S. Department of Justice
(ICPSR 7706) ••• ••.•••••••• 60 Offender based transaction statistics
(08TS), 1979: Hawaii
Bureau of Justice Statistics, (ICPSR 8042) •.••••••••••••• 65
U.S. Department of Justice
JUVenile detention and correctional
facility census, 1975
(ICPSR 7707) •••••••••••••• 60

xiv National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Bureau of Justice Statistics, Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. DepartmElnt of Justice U.S. Department of Justice
Offender based transaction statistics Offender based transaction statistics
(OBTS), 1980: California, Ohio, New York, (OBTS), 1987: Alabama, Alaska, California,
and Pennsylvania Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri,
(ICPSR 8248) ..•..•.••••••• 65 Nebraska, New Jersey, New York,
Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, and Virginia
Bureau of Justice Statlstics, (lCPSR 9287) . • . . . . . . . . . . . . .68
U.S. Department of Justice
Offender based transaction statistics Bureau of Justice Statistics,
(OBTS), 1981: California, Ohio, U.S. Department of Justice
Pennsylvania, Utah, Minnesota, New York, State and local probation and parole
and Virginia systems, 1976
(ICPSR 8277) .••••••••••••• 65 {ICPSR 7673} . • . . • . . . . . . . . . . 69

Bureau of Justice Statistics, Bureau of Justice Statistics,


U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Justice
Offender based transaction statistics state and local prosecution and civil
(OBTS), 1982: California, Ohio, attorney systems, 1976
Pennsylvania, Utah, Minnesota, New York, (ICPSR 7674) .••••.. , .•••••. 69
Virginia, Virgin Islands
(ICPSR 9408) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Abt Associates, Inc.
Prosecution of felony arrests, 1982:
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Portland, Oregon and Washington, DC
U.S. Department of Justice (ICPSR 8717) • • • • • • . • • • . • • . .69
Offender based transaction statistics
(OBTS), 1983: California, Minnesota, Abt Associates, Inc.
Nebraska, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Prosecution of felony arrests, 1982: St.
Utah, Virgin Islands, and Virginia Louis
(lCPSR 8449) • • • • • . . . . . . . . • 66 (ICPSR 8705) • • . . • • • • . . • • . • .70
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Baldus, David C., George Woodworth, and
U.S. Dep.artment of Justice Charles A. Pulaski, Jr.
Offender based transaction statistics Charging and sentencing of murder and
(OBTS), 1984: Alaska, California, voluntary manslaughter cases in Georgia,
Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, 1973·1979
Nebraska, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, (ICPSR 9264) . . . . • • . • . . •..•• 70
and Virginia
(lCPSR 8675) . . . . . . . • . • • • . • 67 Baldus, David C., George Woodworth, and
Charles A. Pulaski, Jr.
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Procedural reform of jury murder
U.S. Department of Justice convictions in Georgis, 1970·1978
Offender based transaction statistics (lCPSR 9265) . . . . • . . . . . . . . . .71
(OBTS), 1985: Alaska, California,
Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Boland, Barbara
Nebraska, New York, Pennsylvania, and Prosecution of felony arrests, 1986:
Virginia Indianapolis, Los Angeles, New Orleans,
(ICPSR 8911) . . • • • • . . . . • . . • 67 Portland, St. Louis, and Washington, DC
(ICPSR 9094) . . . . • . . . . . • . . • . 71
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice Chalken, Marcia R.
Offender based transaction statistics Selecting career criminals for priority
(OBTS), 1986: Alabama, Alaska, California, prosecution. 1984-1986: Los Angeles
Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, County, California and Middlesex County,
Nebraska, New York, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts
Virginia (ICPSR 89aO) . . • . . . . . • . . . . . .72
(ICPSR 9130) . . . . . . . . • • . . . . 68
Champagne, Anthony S. and Stuart S. Nagel
Legal service agencies, 1970
(ICPSR 7369) • . . . . . . • . . . . • . .73

List of data collections xv


Clarke, Stevens H. Institute for Law and Social Research, Inc.
Alaska plea bargaining study, 1974-1976 Prosecutors management and information
(ICPSR 7714) • . • • • . • • • • • • • • 73 system (PROMIS),
New Orleans, 1979
Clarke, Stevens H. (ICPSR 8219) • . • . • . • . • • • • • . • 81
Felony prosecution and sentencing in
North Carolina, 1981·1982 Prosecutors management and information
system (PROMIS),
(lCPSR 8307) . . • . • • . . . . • • • • 74
Rhode Island, 1979
Clements, William H. (ICPSR 8288) • • . • • • . . . . • . • . . 81
Effectiveness of client specific planning Prosecutors management and information
as an alternative sentence, 1981.1982: system (PROMIS),
Washington, D.C. and Fairfax, st. Louis, 1979
Montgomery, and Prince George counties (ICPSR 8225) . • • • • • • • • . • . • • • 81
(ICPSR 8943) . . . . . , . . . . . . . . 74
Kerstetter, Wayne A.
Cunniff, Mark A. Evaluation of pretrial settlement
Penal code citations: Sentencing in 18 conference, Dade County, Rorida,
American felony courts, 1983·1984 criminal court, 1979
(ICPSR 8396) • • • . • • • • . • • . .. 74 (ICPSR 7710) • . . . . • . • • . • . . . . 82

Cunniff, Mark A. Kritzer, Herbert M •• David M. Trubek, William


Sentencing outcomes in 28 felony courts, LF. Felstiner, Joel B. Grossman, and AUstin
1985 [United States] Sarat
(ICPSR 8708) • • . • . • • . • • • • . • 76 Civil litigation in the United States,
1977·1979
Cunniff, Mark A. and The National (iCPSR 7994) • • • • • • • . • . . • • . .82
Association of Criminal Justice Planners
A sentencing postscript: Felony Loftin, Colin and Milton Heumann
probationers under supervision in the Firearms violence and the Michigan
community,1983 Felony Firearm Law: Detroit, 1976·1978
(ICPSR 8647) • . . • • • . . . . . . • • 76 (iCPSR 8509) • • • • • • • . • • . . . • . 83

Feeney, Floyd Miethe, Terance and Charles A. Moore


Arrests without conviction: How often Evaluation of Minnesota's felony
they occur and why, 1979·1980: sentencing guidelines, 1978·1984
JacksonVille and San Diego (ICPSR 9235) • • • . • . . • . . • • . . . 84
(ICPSR 8180) • • • . . • • . . • • • • • 77
Miller, Herbert S., William McDonald, and
Forst, Brian and William Rhodes James A. Cramer
Sentencing in eight United States district Plea bargaining in the United States, 1978
courts, 1973·1978 (ICPSR 7775) • . . . . • • . . • • • • • . 84
(ICPSR 8622) • . • . . • • . •••• ,. 77
Nagei, Stuart S.
Goldkamp, John S. and Michael R. Search and seizure data, 1963
Gottfredson (ICPSR 7539) . . . • . . . . . . . • . . .85
Judicial decision guidelines for bail: The
Philadelphia experiment, 1981·1982 Nagel, Stuart S. and Anthony S. Champagne
(ICPSR 8358) . . . . • . . • . . • . . . 80 Legal represtlntation data, 1970
(ICPSR 7540) . . . . . • . • . • . • . • • 85
Hindus, Michael S.
Slave trials in Anderson and Spartanburg Nagel, Stuart S., Thomas Eimermann, and
counties, South Carolina, 1818·1861 Kathleen Reinbolt
(ICPSR 8674) . . • . • . . . . . . . • . 80 Free press, fair trial data, 1970
(ICPSR 7541) . . • . . . • . • • . . . . • 85
Institute for Law and Social Research. Inc.
Prosecutors management and information Nagel, Stuart S., Paul Wice, and Marian Neff
system (PROMIS) data, Washington D.C., Pretrial release data, 1969
1974-1975 (ICPSR 7538) . • . . . . . • • • • • . . . 86
(ICPSR 7643) • . • • . . • • . . . . . . 81

xvi National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Nardulll, Peter, James Eisenstein, and Roy B. Courts 91
Aeming
Comparing court case processing in nine
courts, 1979·1980 Bureau of Justice Statistics,
(ICPSR 8621) .••••.••.••••• 86 U.S. Department of Justlce
Census of state felony courts, 1985:
National Center for State Courts [United States]
Criminal case processing in metropolitan (ICPSR 8667) . • . • • • . • . . .91
courts, 1976
(lCPSR 7750) . • • . . • • • . . • • . • 86 Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice
National Center for State Courts National judicial reporting program,1986:
State court statistics, 1987: [United States]
[United States1 (ICPSR 9073) • . . • • . . . • • . • . . . 91
(ICPSR 9266) • • • . . . • • . • • • . . 87
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Pretrial Services Resource Center U.S. Department of Justice
National pretrial reporting program, National judicial reporting program, 1988:
1988-1989 [United States]
(ICPSR 9508) • • • . . • • . . . . . • . 87 (ICPSR 9449) . • • . • • • . . • . . . . • 92

Sipes, Dale Anne and Mary Elsner Oram Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Analyzing trial time in California, U.S. Department of Justice
Colorado, and New J£lrsey, 1986 National survey of court organization:
(ICPSR 9223) . • • . . • • . . • . • . • 88 Courts and court division, 1971·1972
(ICPSR 7640) . • • • • • • • . • . • • . . 92
Sparks, Richard F.
Massachusetts statewide criminal justice Abt Associates, Inc.
guidelines evaluation, 1979: Sentencing Federal justice statistics program data,
data 1978·1986: [United States]
(ICPSR 7909) . • . . . • • . . • • • . • 88 (lCPSR 9296) . . • . . . • . • . . • • . . 93

Sparks, Richard F. Abt Associates, Inc.


New Jersey statewide criminal justice National indigent criminal defense survey,
guidelines evaluation, 1979 1982: [United States]
(ICPSR 7910) . • . . • . • . • . . . . . 89 (ICPSR 8417) • . . . • . . • . . . • • . . 94

Sparks, Richard F. Aikman, Alexander, Mary Elsner Oram, and


New Jersey statewide criminal justice Frederick Miller
guidelines evaluation, 1980: Inmate Use of adjuncts to supplement judicial
survey data resources in six jurisdictions, 1983·1986:
(ICPSR 7911) • . . . • • . • . • . . . • 89 [United States]
(lCPSR 8979) • • • . . . • • • . . . • • . 94
Toborg, Mary A.
Pretrial release practices in the United Association of the Bar of the City of New York
States, 1976·1978 and the Drug Abuse Council, Inc.
(ICPSR 7972) . . • . . . • • . . • • • . 89 New York drug law evaluation project, 1973
(ICPSR 7656) ..•. , . . • • . . . . • . 96
Welch, Susan and Cassia Spohn
Effects of prior record in sentencing Church, Thomas W., Jr.
research in a large northeastern city, Assessing local legal culture: Practitioner
1968·1979: [United States] norms in four criminal courts, 1979
(ICPSR 8929) •••••••••••••. 90 (ICPSR 7808) . . . . • . . . . . • . . . • 96

Cole, George F. and Barry Mahoney


Fines as a criminal sanction: Practices
and attitudes of trial court judges in the
United States, 1985
(ICPSR 8945) . . • . • • . • . . . • . . . 97

List of data collections xvii


Court Statistics and Information Management National Center for Juvenile Justice
Project, Juvenile court statistics, 1984:
National Center for State Courts [United States]
State court statistics, 1978-1980 (ICPSR 8940) • . • • . • . • . . • • • • 'f 02
(ICPSR 8280) . • • . . . • . . . . . . • 97
National Center for Juvenile Justice
Federal Judicial Center Juvenile court statistics, 1985:
Federal court cases 1970-1989: Integrated [United States]
data base (ICPSR 9297) . . . . . • . . • . • . . . 103
(ICPSR 8429) • . . . • • . . . . . . . . 98
National Center for Juvenile Justice
Federal Judicial Center and Minnesota State Court Administration
Judicial district data book, 1983: [United Minnesota juvenile court records,
States] 1984-1987
(lCPSR 8439) . . . • . . . . . . • . . • 99 (ICPSR 9447) . . . • . . . • . • . • • . 103

Grofman, Bernard National Center for Juvenile Justice and


Multnomah County [Oregon] jury project, Missouri Division of Youth Services
1973-1976 Missouri juvenile court records, 1984-1987
(ICPSR 9030) . . . . . . . • . . . . . . 99 (ICPSR 9448) . . . . . . • . . . . . . . 103

Heinz, John P. and Edward O. Laumann National Center for Juvenile Justice
Chicago lawyers survey, 1975 and Nebraska Commission on Law
(ICPSR 8218) . . . • . . • • . . . . . 100 Enforcement and Criminal Justice
Nebraska juvenile court records,
Hindus, Michael S., Theodore M. Hammett, 1975·1987
and Barbara M. Hobson (ICPSR8915) . . • . . . . . . . • . . . 104
Massachusetts superior court files,
1859-1959 National Center for State Courts
(ICPSR 7776) . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Public image of courts, 1977: General
public data
Hirsch, Ronald L (ICPSR 7703) . . . . . . • . . . . . . . 105
National survey of lawyers' career Public image of courts, 1977: Special
satisfaction, 1984 publics data
(ICPSR 8975) . . . . . . . . • . . . 100 (ICPSR 7704) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Marvell, Thomas and Carlisle Moody Pennsylvania Sentencing Commission
State appellate court adaptation to Pennsylvania sentencing data, 1977, 1980,
caseload increase, 1968-1984: 1983
[United States] (ICPSR 8327) . . . . . • . . • . . . . . 105
(ICPSR 8262) • . • . • . . . . . . . • 101
Rowland, C.K.
Nagel, Stuart S. Federal district court civil decisions,
Federal court cases, 1962-1963 1981-1987: Detroit, Houston, and Kansas
(ICPSR 7245) . . . . . . . . . . • . 101 City
(ICPSR 9367) . . . . . . • . . . . . . • 105
Nagel, Stuart S.
Judicial characteristics and judicial Silverstein, Lee and Stuart S. Nagel
decision-making study, 1955 American bar foundation: State criminal
(ICPSR 7084) . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 court cases, 1962
(ICPSR 7272) . . • . . . . . . . . . . . 106
National Center for Juvenile Justice
Juvenile court statistics, 1982: Spaeth, Harold J.
[United States] United States supreme court judicial
(ICPSR 8440) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 database, 1953-1988 terms
(ICPSR 9422) • . . • . . . . . • . • . . 106
National Center for Juvenile Justice
Juvenile court statistics, 1983: United States Sentencing Commission
[United States] Monitoring of federal criminal sentences,
(ICPSR 8656) . • . . . . . . . . . . . 102 1987-1989
(ICPSR9317) . . • . . . . . . . . . • . 107

xviii National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


United States Sentencing Commission Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Organizations convicted in federal U.S. Department of Justice
criminal courts, 1988: [United States] Expenditure and employment data for the
(lCPSR 9513) • • • . • • . • . • . . . 107 criminal justice system: Longitudinal file,
1971·1979
Vera lns~tute of Justice, New York City (ICPSR 7636) • . • • • . • • . . • . . • 111
New York City court employment project
evaluation study, 1976·1979 Bureau of Justice Statistics,
(ICPSR 7832) . • • . . . . . • • . . . 108 U.S. Department of Justice
Justice assistance data for the United
Yankelovich, Skelly, and White, Inc. States: Individual units and estimates,
Survey of judges on the role of courts in 1988
American society, 1979 (ICPSR 9440) . . • • . • • • • • . • . . 111
(ICPSR 7824) . • . • • • . . . . • • • 108
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice
National justice agency list, 1980
Criminal justice system 109 (ICPSR 7858) • . • • . . • . . • . • • . 111

Bureau of Justice Statistics, Bureau of Justice Statistics,


U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Justice
Expenditure and employment data for the National justice agency list, 1985
criminal justice system: Annual files, (ICPSR8489) •••.•••••••••• 113
1971-1979
(ICPSR 7618) . • . . • • • • • . . . . 109 Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice
Bureau of Jus~ce Statistics, National justice agency list, 1986
U.S. Department of Justice (ICPSR 8692) • . . . • . • • . . . • • . 113
Expenditure and employment data for the
criminal justice system [United States]: Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Extract file, 1982 U.S. Department of Justice
(ICPSR 8382) • . . . • . . . . • • . . 109 National justice agency list, 1987
(ICPSR 9482) . • • . • . • . . . . • . 113
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Expenditure and employment data for the U.S. Department of Justice
criminal justice system [United States]: Survey of expenditures for criminal justice
Extr.act file, 1983 agencies [United State$}:
(ICPSR 8455) . • . • . . . . . . . • • 109 Full file and extract file, 1985
(ICPSR 8650) . . . . . . • • . . . . . • 114
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice American Justice Institute
Expenditure and employment data for the Systems and training requirements for
criminal justice system [United States]: criminal justice participants (Project
Extract file, 1984 SfAR), 1971·1974: California, Michigan,
(ICPSR 9162) • • . . . . . • • • • . . • 110 New Jersey, Texas
(ICPSR B392) • . • • . . . • • . . . . • 114
Expenditure and employment data for the
criminal justice system [United States]: Bureau of Social Science Research, Inc.
Extract file, 1985 National manpower survey, 1973-1976
(ICPSR9161) . . . . . . . • . . • . • •110 (ICPSR 7675) • . . . . . • . • . . . . . 114
Expenditure and employment data for the
criminal justice system [United States]: Camp, George M. and LeRoy Gould
Extract file, 1986 Influence of sanctions and opportunities
(ICPSR 9160) . • . • . . . . . . • . . .110 on rates of bank robbery, 1970-1975:
[United States]
Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department (ICPSR 8260) . • . . . . . . . • . . . . 115
of Justice
Expenditure and employment data for the
criminal justice system [United States]:
Extract file, 1987
(ICPSR 9396) • • . . • • . . . • • . . .110

List of data collections xix


Center for Action Research and Social Monitoring the future: A continuing study
Science Education Consortium of the lifestyles and values of youth, 1977
Law-related education evaluation project (ICPSR 7928) • • • • • • • • • • . • • • 121
[United States], 1979-1984 Monitoring the future: A continuing study
(ICPSR 8406) . • • • • • . . • . • • • • 115 of the lifestyles and values of youth, 1978
(ICPSR 7929) • . • • • • • . • . . . • . 121
Chabota', Kent
National assessment of criminal justice Monitoring the future: A continuing study
needs, 1983: [United States] of the lifestyles and values of youth, 1979
(ICPSR 8362) • • • . • . . • • • • • • • 116 (ICPSR 7930) . • . • • . • • • • • . • . 121
Monitoring the future: A continuing study
Feyerherm, William H. of the lifestyles and values of youth, 1980
Individual responses to affirmative action (ICPSR 7900) . • • . . • • • • . • • . . 122
issues in criminal justice agencies, 1981: Monitoring the future: A continuing study
[United States] of the lifestyles and values of youth, 1981
(ICPSR9311) . • • • • • • • . . . • • . 116 (ICPSR 9013) . • • . . . • • . . • • • • 122
Forst, Brian and William Rhodes Monitoring the future: A continuing study
Six-year follow-up study on career of the lifestyles and values of youth, 1982
criminals, 1970-1976: [United States] (ICPSR 9045) • • . • • • . . • . . . • . 122
(ICPSR 8648) • • . • . • • . • . • • • . 117 Monitoring the future: A continuing study
of the lifestyles and values of youth, 1983
Hakim, Simon (ICPSR 83B7) • . • . . • • . . . . • • • 122
Impact of casino gambling on crime in the Monitoring the future: A continuing study
Atlantic City region, 1970-1984 of the lifestyles and values of youth, 1984
(ICPSR 9237) . . . • • • • . . . . . • . 118 (ICPSR B3BB) • . • . . . • • • • . . . . 122
McDonald, William F., Lonnie A. Athens, and Monitoring the future: A continuing study
Thomas J. Minton of the lifestyles and values of youth, 1985
Repeat offender laws in the United States: (ICPSR 8546) . • . • . • • . . . • . . . 122
Forms, uses, and perceived value, 1983 Monitoring the future: A continuing study
(lCPSR 9328) . . . . . • . . . . • . . .118 of the lifestyles and values of youth, 1986
(ICPSR B701) • . • • • . . . . • . • • . 123
Office of Justice Assistance, Research, Monitoring the future: A continuing study
and Statistics of the lifestyles and values of youth, 1987
Law enforcement assistance (lCPSR 9079) . . • . . • . • . . . . . . 123
administration profile data, [1968-1978]
(ICPSR 8075) . • • . . . • . . . • . • .119 Monitoring the future: A continuing study
of the lifestyles and values of youth, 1988
Wise, Lois Recascino (ICPSR 9259) . . • • . • . • • . . • • . 124
Factors influencing the quality and utility Monitoring the future: A continuing study
of government-sponsored criminal justice of the lifestyles and values of youth, 1989
research in the United States, 1975-1986 (ICPSR 9397) . • . • . • . . . • • • . • 125
(ICPSR 9089) . . . . • . . . . . • . . •119
BlUmstein, Alfred and Jacqueline Cohen
Zedlewski, Edwin W. Adult criminal careers in New York,
Public and private resources in public 1972-1983
safety [United States]: Metropolitan area (ICPSR 9353) . . . • • . . . . . . • . . 126
panel data, 1977 and 1982
(ICPSR 8988) . • . . • . . • . . . . . 120 BlUmstein, Alfred and Jacqueline Cohen
Adult criminal careers, Michigan:
1974-1977
(ICPSR B279) . . . . . • . . . . • . • . 126
DGlinquency 121
Debra, Julius
Bachman, Jerald G., Uoyd D. Johnston, and Research on minorities, [1981]:
Patrick M. O'Malley Race and crime in Atlanta and
Monitoring the future: A continuing study Washington, D.C.
of the lifestyles and values of youth, 1976 (ICPSR 8459) . . . . . . . . . • . . . . 127
(ICPSR 7927) . • . . . . . . • . . . . 121

xx National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Denno, Deborah W. Loeber, Rolf
Longitudinal study of biosocial factors Screening of youth at risk for delinquency
related to crime and delinquency, in Oregol1,1980-1985
1959.. 1962: [Pennsylvania) (ICPSR9312) • . . . • • . . • . . . • • 132
(lCPSR 8928) . . . • . . . . . • . • • 127
National Instltute of Justlce,
Elliott, Delbert U.S. Department of Justlce
National youth survey [United Slates]: Drug use forecasting in 20 cities in the
Wave I, 1976 United States, 1987·1988
(ICPSR 8375) • . • . • • . . . • • • • 127 (ICPSR 9477) . • . • • • • . . • . . . . 132

Elliott, Delbert Paternoster, Raymond, et al.


National youth survey [United States]: Youths and deterrence: Columbia, South
Wave II, 1977 Carolina, 1979-1981
(ICPSR 8424) . . . . . • . . . . . . • 128 (ICPSR 8255) . . • • • • . . • . . . . . 133

Elliott, Delbert Pennell, Susan, Christlne Curtis, and Jeff


National youth survey [United States]: Tayman
Wave III, 1978 Illegal immigration and crime in San Diego
(ICPSR 8506) . . . . • • . . . . . • . 128 and EJ Paso counties, 1985-1986
(ICPSR 9330) . . . . . . . . • . . . . . 133
Elliott, Delbert
National youth survey [United States]: Poll<. Kenneth
Wave 'W, 1979 Marion County [Oregon] youth study,
(ICPSR 8917) . . . . . • . . . • . • • 128 1964-1979
(ICPSR 8334) . . . . . . . . • . . . . . 134
Elliott, Delbert
National youth survey [United States]: Shannon, Lyle W.
Wave V, 1980 Juvenile delinquency and adult crime,
(ICPSR9112) • • . . . . . . • . . 129 1948-1977 [Racine, Wisconsin]: City
ecological data
Farrington, David P. (lCPSR 8164) . • . . . . . . . . . • . . 135
Cambridge study in delinquent
development [Great Britain], 1961·1981 Shannon, Lyle W.
(ICPSR 8488) • . . . . • . . . . . . . 129 Juvenile delinquency and adult crime,
1948·1977 [Racine, Wisconsin]: Three
Figlio, Robert M., Paul E. Tracy, and Marvin birth cohorts
E. Wolfgang (ICPSR 8163) • • . • • • • • • • . • • . 135
Delinquency in a birth cohort II:
Philadelphia, 1958·1986 Singer, Simon I.
(lCPSR 9293) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 Deterrent effects of the New York juvenile
offender law, 1974-1984
Gold, Martin (lCPSR 9324) . . • . • . . . • . . . . . 136
National survey of youth, 1972
(ICPSR 7593) . . • • • . . . . . • . . 130 Swicord, Donald
Survey of facilities for runaway and
Gold, Martin and Jay R. Williams homeless youth, 1983-1988
National survey of youth, 1967 (ICPSR 9129) . • . . • . . . . . • . . . 136
(ICPSR 3509) . • . • . . . . . • . 131
Tech, Hans and Kenneth Adams
Haapenan, Rudy and Carl F. Jesness Disturbed violent offenders in New York,
Early identification of the chronic ~985
offender, {1978·1980: California] (ICPSR 9325) . • . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
(ICPSR 8226) . • . . . . • . . . . • . 131
Widom, Cathy Spatz
Katz, Jack Child abuse, neglect, and violent criminal
Autobiographical accounts of property behavior in a midwest metropolitan area
offenses by youths at UCLA, 1983-1984 of the United States, 1967·1988
(lCPSR 8950) . . . . . • • . . . . . • 131 (ICPSR 9480) . • • . . . • . . . . . . • 137

List of data collections xxi


Wolfgang, Marvin E., Robert M. Flgllo, and Official statistics 147
Thorsten Sellin
Delinquency In a birth cohort in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1945·1963: Baumer, Terry and Michael D. Carrington
Individual file Robbery of financial institutions in
(ICPSR 7729) . • • . • . • • • • • • . 138 Indiana, 1982·1984
(ICPSR9310) • . • • • • • • • . • . • • 147
Delinquency In a birth cohort in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1945·1963: Bennett, Richard R.
Offenses filo Correlates of crime: A study of 52 nations,
(ICPSR 7729) . . • . . . . • • . • • . 138 1960·1984
(ICPSR 9258) . . • . . • . • . . • • • . 147
Zill, Nicholas, Frank Furstenberg, Jr., and
James Peterson Block, Carolyn Rebecca, and the Illinois
National survey of children: Wave I, 1976, Criminal Justice Information Authority
Wave II, 1981, and Wave III, 1987 Homicides in Chicago, 1965·1981
(ICPSR 8670) . • . . . • . • . . . • . 139 (ICPSR 8941) . • • . . . • . . • . • . • 148

Bureau of the Census,


U.S. Department of Commerce
Governmental response to crime 141 Census of population and housing, 1970
(United States]: Persons in institutions
Jacob, Herbert and other group quarters by age, sex,
Governmental res;,;onses to crime in the race, and Spanish origin
United States, 1£148·1978 (ICPSR 8342) . . . • . . . • . • • . . . 148
(ICPSR 8076) . ' . . . . . . . . . . . 141 Census of population and housing, 1980
[United States]: Group quartors
Pogue, Thomas F. population by age, sex, race, and Spanish
Deterrent effects of arrests and origin
imprisonment in the United States, (ICPSR 8341) . . • . . • . . . . • . • . 148
1960·1977
(ICPSR 7973) . . . . . . . . • . . . . 141 Bureau of the Census,
U.S. Department of Commerce
Rosenbaum, Dennis P., Arthur J. Lurigio, and County and city data book [United States],
Paul J. Lavrakas 1988
Crime stoppers: A national evaluation of (ICPSR 9251) . • . . . . . . . . . • • . 149
program operations and effects, 1984
(lCPSR 9349) . . . . . . . . • . • . . 142 Federal Bureau of Investigation,
U.S. Department of Justice
Uniform crime reporting program data:
[United States]
Illegal corporate behavior 143 (ICPSR 9028) . . . . . . . . . • . . . . 150

Block, Michael K. and Fredrick C. Nold Federal Bureau of Investigation,


Deterrent effects of ,1Intitrust enforcement U.S. Department of Justice
[United States]: The ready-mix concrete Uniform crime reporting program data
industry, 1970·1980 [United States], 1966·1976
(lCPSR 9040) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 (lCPSR 7676) • . . . . • . • . . . • . . 151

Clinard, Marshall B. and Peter C. Yeager Federal Bureau of Investigation,


Illegal corporate behavior, 1975·1976 U.S. Department of Justice
(ICPSR 7855) . . • . . . . . . • . . • 143 Uniform crime reporting program data
[United States]: County level arrest and
Wheeler, Stanton, David Weisburd, and offenses data, 1977·1983
Nancy Bode (ICPSR 8703) . . • • . . . . • . . . .. 151
Nature and sanctioning of white collar
crime, 1976·1978: Federal judi cal districts Federal Bureau of Investigation,
(ICPSR 8989) . . . . . • . . . . . . . 144 U.S. Department of Justice
Uniform crime reporting program data
[United States]: County level arrest and
offenses data, 1984
(ICPSR 8714) . . . . . . . . . . . • • • 152

xxii National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Federal Bureau of Investigation, Fox, James Alan and Glenn L. Pierce
U.S. Department of Justice Uniform crime reports [United States]:
lJniform crime reporting program data Supplementary homicide reports,
[United States]: Detailed arrest and 1976·1983
offense data for 321 counties, 1988 (ICPSR 8657) . . • . . . • . . . . • . . 157
(ICPSR 9470) . . . . . . . . • . . • . 152
Greenberg, David F.
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Age cohort arrest rates, 1970·1980
U.S. Department of Justice (ICPSR 8261) . . . . . . . . . • • • • . 158
Uniform crime reports: COunty level arrest
and offense data, 1986 Gurr, Ted Robert and Erika Gurr
(ICPSR 9119) . • • • • • • . • • • • • 153 Crime in western societIes, 1945·1974
(ICPSR 7769) • . . . . . . . • . . . . . 158
Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S.
Department of Justice Hellman, Daryl A. and James Alan Fox
Uniform crime reports: COunty level Census of urban crime, 1970
detailed arrest and offense data, 1988 (lCPSR 8275) . . . . . • • . . . . . . . 159
(lCPSR 9335) . . . . . • . . . 154
Hewitt, John
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Social order in Middletown, 1932·1975
U.S. Department of Justice (ICPSR 905B) . . . . . • . . • . . • . . 159
Uniform crime reports: Arrest data for the
75 most populous counties in the United Uzotte, Alan J.
States, 1986 Crime on campus, 1978·1979:
(lCPSR9163) • . . . . • . . . . . . . 154 A survey of 150 college campuses
and cities
Federal Bureau of Investigation, (ICPSR 8381) . . . . . • . . . . . . . . 159
U.S. Department of Justice
Uniform crime reports: Arrest data for 121 National Center for Health Statistics
counties in the United States, 1986 Mortality detail files, 1968·1978 [Volume I],
(ICPSR 9226) . . . . . . . . . . . . • 155 1979·1980 [Volume 11],1981·1982 [Volume
111],1983·1964 [Volume IV}, 1965 [Volume
Federal Bureau of Investigation, V), and 1986·1987 [Volume VI]
U.S. Department of Justice (ICPSR 7632) . . . . . . . • • . • • . • 159
Uniform crime reports: County level
detailed arrest and offense data, 1985 and National Center for Health Statistics
1987 Mortality detail file: External cause
(lCPSR 9252) . . . . • . . . . . • . . 155 extract, 1968·1978, 1979-1980
(lCPSR 8224) • . . . . . . . • . . . . . 161
Federal Bureau of Investigation,
U.S. Department of Justice Pierce, Glenn L., William J. Bowers, James
Uniform crime reports, 1966·1976: Data Baird, and Joseph Heck
aggregated by standard metropolitan Uniform crime reports! National time
statistical areas series community-level database,
(lCPSR 7743) • . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 1967·1960
(ICPSRB214) . . . . . . . . • . . . . . 162
Federal Bureau of Investigation,
U.S. Department of Justice Pierce, Glenn L and James Alan Fox
and Bureau of the Census, Uniform crime reports: Offenses known
U.S. Department of Commerce and clearances by arrest time series data,
Uniform crime reports, 1958·1969, 1965·1983
and county and city data books, 1962, (ICPSR 8631) . . . . . . • • . . . • . . 162
1967, 1972: Merged data
(ICPSR 7715) • • . • • • • . . . . 157 Riedel, Marc and Margaret A. Zehn
Trends in American homicide, 1968·1978:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Victim·level supplementary homicide
Department of Justice reports
Uniform crime reporting program data (lepSR 8676) • • . • • • . . • . • • . . 163
[United States]: Offenses known and
clearances by arrest in all cities with
populations over 250,000,1987-1988
(ICPSR9336) • • • • . • • • • • • • • 157

List of data collections xxiii


Vandaele, Walter Edelhertz, Herbert, and Thomas D. OVercast
Participation in illegitimate activities: Organized crime business activities and
Ehrlich revisited, 1960 their implications for law enforcement,
(ICPSR 8677) •.•••••.••••. 164 1986·1987
(ICPSR 9476) •••••••••••••• 170
Wolfgang, Marvin E., Robert M. Flglio, Paul
E. Tracy, and Simon I. Singer Ka'1sas City, Missouri, Police Department
National crime surveys: Index of crime Police response time analysis, 1975
severity, 1977 (ICPSR 7760) •.••••••••.••. 171
(ICPSR 8295) .•.•.•••••••. 165
Klein, Malcolm W., Cheryl L Maxson, and
Zahn, Margaret A. and Marc Aledel Margaret A. Gordon
Nature and patterns of homicide Police response to street gang violence In
in eight American cities, 1978 California: Improving the investigative
(ICPSR 8936) •••..•.•••••• 165 process,1985
(ICPSR 8934) • • • • • • • • . . • • • . 171
Zimrlng, Franklin E. and James Zeuhl
Robberies in Chicago, 1982·1983 Martin, Susan
(ICPSR8951) • . • • . • • • . • • . . 166 Improving evidence collection through
police-prosecutor coordination in
Baltimore, 1984-1985
(ICPSR 9290) • . • • • . • . • • . • • • 172
Police 167
Matulla, Kenneth J.
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Police use of deadly force, 1970·1979
U.S. Department of Justice (ICPSR 9018) • • • • . • . • • • . • • . 173
Directory of law enforcement agencies,
1986: [United States] McCampbell, Michael S.
(lCPSR 8696) . • • • • • • . . • . . . 167 National survey of field training programs
for police officers, 1985·1986
Bureau of Justice Statistics, (lCPSR 9350) • • • • • . • . • . . • . • 173
U.S. Department of Justice
law enforcement management and Monkkonen, Eric
administrative statistics (lEMAS), 1987 Police departments, arrests and crime in
(lCPSR 9222) . • • . • . . . . • . • • 167 the United States, 1860·1920
(ICPSR 7708) . • • . . • . • • • • . . • 174
Bayley, David
Effectiveness of police response: Denver, Orne, Martin T. and Wayne G. Whitehouse
1982 Use and effectiveness of hypnosis and
(iCPSR 8217) . • . • . • . • . • • • . 168 the cognitive interview for enhancing
eyewitness recall: Philadelphia, 1988·1989
Berk, Richard A. and Lawrence W. Sherman (iCPSR 9478) .•••••••••.••• 174
Specific deterrent effects of arrest for
domestic assault: Minneapolis, 1981·1982 Ostrom, Elinor, Roger B. Parks, and Gordon
(ICPSR 8250) . . • • . • • • . . . • . 168 P. Whitaker
Police referral practices and social service
Bowers, William, Jon Hirsch, Jack McDevitt, agency practices in three metropolitan
and Glenn Pierce areas, 1977
Effects of foot patrol policing in Boston, (ICPSR 7791) • • • • • • . • . . • • . . 175
1977·1985
(ICPSR 9351) .•••••••••..• 169 Ostrom, Elinor, Roger B. Parks, and Gordon
P. Whitaker
Dunford, Franklyn W., David Huizinga, and Police services study, Phase 11,1977:
Delbert S. Elliott Rochester, St. louis, and St. Petersburg
Domestic violence experience in Omaha, (ICPSR 8605) • • • . • • • • • . • • . • 175
Nebraska, 1986·1987
(lCPSR 9481) . . • • • . . • . . • • • 169 Pate, Antony M. and Sampson O. Annan
Community policing in Baltimore,
1986·1987
(ICPSR 9401) . • . • • • • • . • . • • . 176

xxiv National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Petersllia, Joan, Allen Abrahamse, and UchIda, CraIg D. and Timothy S. Bynum
James Q. Wilson Effects of "United States vs. Leon" on
Police performance and case attrition in police search warrant practices, 1984-1985
Los Angeles County, 1980·1981 (ICPSR 9348) • . • . . • . . . • • • • . 1B4
(ICPSR 9352) • . . • • . • • • • . . • 177
Van Dulzend, Richard, L Paul SUtton, and
Peterson, Joseph L, Steve Mlhajlovlc, and Charlotte A. Carter
Michael GlIHland Search warrant procedures In seven
Forensic evidence and the police, cities, 1984: [United States)
1976·1980 (ICPSR 8254) • • • . . . . • • . • • • . 185
(ICPSR 8186) • • . • • . . . . , . . . 178
Reiss, Albert J., Jr.
Attitudes and perceptions of police Victimization 187
officers In Boston, Chicago, and
Washington, DC, 1966 Bureau of Jus~ce Statls~csi
(ICPSR 9087) • • . . . . • . . • • . • 178 U.S. Department of Jus~ce
Commercial victimization surveys,
Ralss, Albert J., Jr. 1973·1975 [United States]: Cities sample
Patterns of behavior in police and citizen (iCPSR 8002) • • . • . • • . • • • . • . 187
transactions: Boslon, Chicago, and
Washington, DC, 1966 Commercial victimization surveys,
(ICPSR 9086) . . . . . . . . . . . . , 179 1973·1977 [United States]: National sample
(ICPSR 8003) . • • • . . . . . . • • . • 187
Reiss, Albert J., Jr,
Survey of victimization and attitudes Bureau of Justice Statls~cs,
towards crime and law enforcement in U.S. Department of JUstice
Boston and Chicago, 1966 National crime surveys: Cities sample,
(ICPSR 9085) . • • . . . . . • • • • • 180 1972·1975 (complote sa"';I~le)
(ICPSR 7658) • . . • . • • • . . . . . . 187
Snortum, John R., et aI. National crime surveys: Citios sample,
Police documentation of drunk driving 1972·1975 (person level file)
arrests, 1984-1987: Lor. Angeles, Denver, (ICPSR 7658) . . . • • . • • . • • . . . 187
and Boslon
(ICPSR 9400) . • • . . . . • . . . . . 181 Sureau of Jus~ce Stat/sties, U.S. Department
of Justice
Spelman, William and Dale K. Brown National crime surveys: Crime school
calling the police: Citizen reporting of supplement) 1989
serious crime, 1979 (ICPSR 9394) . • . • . • , . . . . . . • 188
(ICPSR 8185) ••••••••••••• 182
Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department
Stillman, Frances A. of Justice
Concerns of police survivors, 1986: National crime surveys: National sample,
[United States) 1973·1983
(ICPSR 9327) . • • . . . . • . . . . . 182 (lCPSR 7635) . . • . • . • . • • . • • • 188
Teplln, Unda A. Bureau of Jus~ce Statls~cs,
Keeping the peace: Police discretion and U.S. Department of Justice
the mentally disordered in Chicago, National crilTlG survoys: National sample,
1980·1981 1979·1987 [revised questionnaire)
{ICPSR 8438} . • • • • . • . • . . . . 183 (ICPSR 8608) . • • • • • • . . • • . • • 193
Triplett, Ruth, at a1. Bureau of Justice Statistics,
City police expenditures, 1946·1985: U.S. Department of Justice
[United Stales) National crlmo surveys: National sample,
(ICPSR 8706) • • . . • . . . . . . . . 183 1986·1990 [near-term data]
(ICPSR 8864) . . . • . . . • • • . . • . 195
Uchida, Craig D. and Laure W. Brooks
Violence against police: Baltimore County,
Maryland,1984-1986
(ICPSR 9347) . • • . . . . . . • . . . 184

List of data collections xxv


Bureau of Justice Statistics, Gibbs, John J. and Peggy L. Shelly
U.S. Department of Justice Xenon (New Jersey) commercial burglary
National crime surveys: National sample data, 1979-1981
of rape victims, 1973-1982 (ICPSR 8088) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 204
(ICPSR 8625) ••••••••••••• 197
Groves, Robert M.
Bureau of Justice Statistics, National crime surveys redesign data:
U.S. Department of Justice Peoria record check study
National crime surveys: Rodeslgn data, (IOPSR 8669) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 204
1975-1979
(lCPSR 8484) ••••••••••••• 197 Hernon, Jolene o. and Brian Forst
Criminal justice response to victim harm
Bureau of Justice StatIstics, In tho United States, 1981
U.S. Department of ,;ustlce (IOPSR 8249) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 205
National crime surveys: Reverse record
check studies: Washington, D.C., San Home Office Research and Planning Unit
Jose, and Baltimore, 1970-1971 British crime survey, 1982
(ICPSR 8693) ••••••••••••• 198 (IOPSR 8672) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 206
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Home Office Research and Planning Unit
U.S. Department of Justice British crime surveys, 1984
National crime surveys: Victim risk (ICPSR 8685) • • • • • • • • • • . • • • 206
supplement, 1983
(IOPSR8316) •.•••••••.••• 199 Innes, Ohrlstopher A.
National crime surveys extract: Personal
Archer, Dane and Rosemary Gartner crime longitudinal files, 1976-1982:
Violence and crime in cross-national Assault victim experiences
perspective, 1900-1972 (lOPSR 8315) •••••• , • • • • • • . 207
(ICPSR 8612) •••••••••.••. 200 National crime surveys extract: Personal
crime longitudinal files, 1976-1982: Victim
Cook, ROYEr, Barbara Smith, and Adele and non-victim rosponses
Harrell (IOPSR 8315) • • . • • • • . • • •••• 207
Helping crime victims: Levels of trauma
and effectiveness of services in Arizona, Pate, Anthony and Sampson Annan
1983-1984 Reducing fear of crime: Program
(IOPSR 9329) .••....•••••• 200 evaluation survey in Newark and Houston,
1983-1984
Davis, Robert O. (IOPSR 8496) . • • • • • . • • • . • • • 207
Providing help to victims: A study of
psychological and material outcome.:; in Research Tliangle Institute
New York City, 1984-1985 Criminal victimization of District of
(IOPSR 9479) •.••••.•.•..• 201 Columbia residents and Oapitol Hill
employees, 1982-1983
Dutch Ministry of Justice (IOPSR 8228) • • • • • • • . • • • • . • 208
International victimization survey, 1988
(IOPSR 9421) ••••••••••••• 202 Schreiber, Jan E.
Inmate victimization in state prisons in the
Gelles, Richard J. and Murray A. Straus United States, 1979
Physical violence in American families, (lOPSR 8087) • • • • • • . • • • ••.• 208
1985
(IOPSR 9211) • • • • • . . . . . • . • 203 Skogan, Wesley G., Robert O. Davis, and
Arthur J. Lurigio
Gibbs, John J. and Peggy L. Shelly Victim::;' needs and victim services,
Port Authority cargo theft data of New 1988-1989: Evanston, Rochester, Pima
Jersey and New York, 1978-1980 Oounty, and Fayette County
(IOPSR 8089) ••••••.••••.. 203 (lOPSR 9399) . • . • • • • . • • • • • • 209
Gibbs, John J. and Peggy L. Shelly Straus, Murray A. and Richard J. Gelles
SLATS truck theft data of New York City, Physical violence in American families,
1976-1980 1976
(IOPSR 8090) ••..•••..•••• 204 (IOPSR 7733) • . • • • . . . • . •••• 209

xxvi National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Attitude sUlVeys

Bureau of Justice Statistics, hoi abuse In the respondent's community, fed-


U.S. Department of JUstice eral spending on drug abuse, and the relative
effectiveness In controlling the use of drugs of
Nfltlonal crime surveys: CIties attitude strategies such as stopping lIIegalimporta-
sub-sample, 1972-1975 tlon, arresting drug sellers, arresting drug us-
ers, and educating the public. In addition, re-
(lCPSR 7663) spondents were asked if yarlous substances
(e.g., mariJuana, LSD, alcohol, and clga-
The National Crime Surveys were designed rettas) were dangerous to their health, which
by the Bureau of Justice Statistics to obtain caused the most trouble In society, and If sub-
detailed information about crime and Its vic- stances such as cigarettes, alcohol, mari-
tims, and consequences. This sub-sample is juana, and heroin should be legal or Illegal for
a study of personal and household victimiza- an adult to buy. They also were asked If they
tion, with victimization being measured on the agreed or disagreed with the following state-
basis of six selected crimes (inciuding at- merits: (1) Drug abuse won't stop because
tempts): rape, robbery, assault, burglary, lar- people continue to want drugs, (2) People
ceny, and motor vehicle theft. The research should be allowed to take drugs as long as
design consists of a survey of households In they don't hurt someone else, (3) CUrrent
26 major U.S. cities, The data collection was fears about an Illegal drug crisis are Inflated,
conducted by the United States Census Bu- and (4) Illegal drug use had become a central
reau, Initial processing of the data and docu- part of American society. other topics cov-
mentation was performed by the Data Use ered Include the possible outcomes of legali-
and Access Laboratories (DUALabs), and zation of various drugs. Background Informa-
subsequent processing was performed by the tfon on respondents Includes education, age,
ICPSR under grants from the Bureau of Jus- race, sex, and state/region of residence.
tice Statistics (BJS). The Cities Attitude Sub- Class IV
sample also includes Information on percep-
tions of crime and the police and the impact Universe: Adults aged 18 and over living in
of criminal victimization upon the fear of households with telephones In the 48 contigu-
crime. The Sub-sample Is a one-half random ous United States.
sample of the National Crime Surveys: Cities
Sample, 1972-1975 (Complete Sample) Sampling: Random digit dialing.
(ICPSR 7658), In which an attitude question-
naire was administered. The Sub-sample con- Note: The data contain blanks and alphabetic
tains data from the same 26 cities that are characters. A weight variable is Included that
used in the Complete Sample. Class I must be used in any analysis.

Extent of collection: 1 data file

ABC News Card Image data format

ABC News "Nlghtllne" drugs and rectangular file structure


alcohol poll, August 1988
509 cases
{ICPSR 9180} 59 variables
SO-unit-long record
Summary: Focusing on drug and alcohol 2 records per cnse
abuse, this survey solicited respondents' opin-
ioos on the most important problem facing the
country, government prohibition of alcohol In
the 1920s, the use of drugs or alcohol for en-
joymenf, the relative severity of drug and aleo-

Attitude surveys 1
ABC News presidential vote choIce, education, age, relig-
ion, social class, marital status, household
ABC News poll of public opinion on composition, labor union membership, em-
crime, December 1982 ployment status, race, sex, Income, and
state/region of residence. Class IV
(ICPSR 8100)
Universe: Adults aged 18 and over living In
thIs survey was conducted by Chilton Re- households with telephones In the 48 contigu-
search ServIces for ABC News. IntervIews ous United States and the District of
were conducted wIth 2,464 respondents dur- Columbia
Ing December of 1982. Respondents were
questioned regardIng their perceptIons of Sampling: Households were selected by ran-
crime and the crImInal justice system. Ques- dom digit dialing. Within household, the re-
tions assessed the respondents' fears of be- spondent selected was the adult living in the
Ing a victim of crime, perceptions of the household who last had a birthday and who
seriousness of crime In the U.S., eVa/uatlon was at home at the time of the interview.
of the Judicial and penal systems, assess-
ment of police performance, and confidence Note: The data contain blanks and alphabetic
in the ability of the police to prevent crime. characters. A weight variable is included that
The poll also ask~d respondents' opinions to- must be used in any analysis.
ward Reagan's policies, the state of the econ-
omy, and government spending. This data col- Extent of collection: 1 data file
lection consists of a machine-read-able
codebook and an OSIRIS data file with a logi- Card image data format
cal record length of 158 c~\racters. A card-im-
age file is also available. There are 147 vari- rectangular file structure
ables for 2,464 cases. Class II 1,518 cases
121 variables
80-unlt-long record
4 records per case
ABC News/WashIngton Post
ABC News/ Washington Post poll,
January 1990
ABC News/Washington Post
(ICPSR 9436)
ABC News/Washington Post poll,
Summary: This data collection is part of a con- February 1990
tinuing series of monthly surveys that evalu- (iCPSR 9438)
ate the Bush presidency and solicit opinions
on a varlet)' of political and s()Ciallssues. Re- Summary: This data collection Is part of a con-
spondents were asked to name the two most tinuing series of monthly surveys that evalu-
important problems facing the country, if they ate the Bush presidency and solicit opinions
approved of the way George Bush was han- on a variety of political and social Issues. Re-
dling the nation's economy, the environment, spondents were asked if they approved of the
the Illegal drug problem, and foreign affairs, way George Bush was handling the nation's
and If they trusted federal, state, and local economy, the illegal drug problem, foreign af-
governments to do what was right. Respon- fairs, and relations with China, and if they ap-
dents also were questioned cLS to which politi- proved of the way George Bush, Congress,
cal party they trusted to do a better job han- and Dan Quayle were handling their jobs. In
dling a variety of political, economic, and addition, respondents were questioned re-
social problems, If they thought things would garding Bush's State of the Union address
get better in the next ten years, and how they and the leadership roles of Bush and Con-
wouid rate the military and economic power gress. Other topics covered inclUde the capi-
of the United States vis-a-vis Japan and the tal gains tax, abortion, the Social Security sys-
Soviet Union over the past 20 years. Other tem, defense spending, the upcoming
topics covered include the United States' mili- international drug summit, and drug trafficking
tary action in Panama, Manuel Noriega, the il- In Colombia. Background Information on re-
legal drug problem, and respondents' satisfac- spondents includes political alignment, 1988
tion with careers, marriage, children, and presidential vote choice, education, age, relig-
cultural life. Background information on re- ion, social class, marital status, household
spondents Includes political alignment, 1988 composition, labor union membership, em-

2 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


ployment status, race, sex, Income, and ment, education, age, race, sex, and state/re-
state/region of residence. Class IV gion of residence. Class IV
Universe: Adults aged 1B and over living In Universe: Adults aged 18 and over living In
households with telephones In the 48 contigu- households with telephones In the 48 contigu-
ous United States and the District of ous United States.
ColumbIa
Sampling: Households were selected by ran-
Sampling: Households were selected by ran- dom digit dialing. Within household, the re-
dom digit dialing. Within household, the re- spondent selected was the adult living In th",
spondent selected was the adult living In the household who last had a birthday and who
household Who last had a bIrthday and who was at home at the time of the Interview.
was at home at the time of the Interview.
Note: The data contain blanks and alphabetic
Note: The data contaln blanks and alphabetic characters.
characters. A weight variable Is InclUded that
must be used In any analysis. Extent of collection: 1 data file
ExtBflt of collection: 1 data file Card image data format
Card Image data format rectangular file structure
778 cases
rectangular file structure 34 variables
1,OOB cases SO-unit-long record
90 variables 2 records per case
BO-unlt-Iong record
3 records per case

American polnica/ Science Association/


Wesley G. Skogan and William Klecka
ABC News/Washington Post
Setups: American politics: Fear of crime
ABC News/ Washington Post Souter
nomination poll, July 1990 (ICPSR 7368)
(ICPSR 9402) Supplementary Empirical Teaching Units In
Political Science (SETUPS) for American Poli-
Summary: This survey focuses on the nomi- tics are computer-related modules desIgned
nation of David H. Souter to the United States for use in teaching Introductory courses In
Supreme Court. Respondents were asked if American government and politics. The
they favored the 1973 Supreme Court ruling seven modules are Intended to demonstrate
that allowed abortlon within the first three the process of examining evidence and reach-
months of pregnancy, If a nominee's views on Ing conclusions and to stimulate students to
abortlon should influence Senate confirma- Independent, critical thinking and a deeper un-
tion, if they approved of Souter's nomination derstanding of substantive content. They en-
to the Supreme Court, and if they thought able stUdents with no previous training to
Bush should have appointed a minority or a make use of the computer to analyze data on
woman to the Court. Respondents also were political behavior or to see the results of pol-
asked If the Senate should consider Souter's icy decisions by use of a simUlation model.
political views as well as his background and This SETUPS uses 27 variables from the Bu-
qualifications, if Bush should have ascer- reau of Justice Statistics surveys taken in
tained Souter's political and legal views on 1973-1974. The data consists of a sample of
major Issues before nominating him, if the 981 persons from San Diego and 1,017 from
Senate Judiciary Committee should question New York City. The exercises teach students
Souter about his views on Issues such as about the frequency of various kinds of crimi-
abortlon, if they thought the nomination would nal victimization, the personal characteristics
become bogged down in politics in the Sen- of the targets of those crimes. ~nd the impact
ate, and if Souter should be confirmed only if of criminal victimization upon tile fear of
he said he would vote to overturn the Su- crime. (See ICPSR 7663 for full file.)
preme Court's 1973 ruling. Background infor-
rnatlon on respondents includes political align-

Attitude surveys 3
Blumenthal, Monica D., Robert L. Kahn, role of the respondents' personal values, their
and Frank M. Andrews definitions of violence, and their identification
with the groups Involved In violence. To exam-
ICPSR Instructional subset: Justifying ine the degree of violence which American
violence: Attitudes of American men, men felt could be justified for social conirol,
1969 the Investigators asked respondents to react
to situations Involving protests and other dis-
(lCPSR 7517) turbances. These situations Included hood-
lUm gang disturbances, student protests, and
This Instructional subset of 62 variables from black protest demonstrations. The respon-
the original justifying v!olence study Includes dents were asked what police actlons-from
an Initial series of questions which a"lk "letting it go" to ·shootlng to kliI"-were appro-
whether respondents view such actions as priate as police control measures. Several
protest demonstrations, police frisking, loot- such Items were combined to form an Index
Ing, burglary, and draft-card burning as vio- of "vIolence for social control." In questions
lence. Then the study Inquires about possible dealing with the level of violence necessary to
causes of violence and motives of those who bring about social change, respondents were
participate in violence. Another set of vari- asked whether they agreed with the necessity
ables deals with relative views of property of "protest In which some people will be killed"
damage and personal injury and respondents' in order to bring about changes sought by
agreement or disagreement with such state- blacks, by student demonstrators, and in gen-
ments as "it is often necessary to use vio- eral. These items were combined Into an In-
lence to prevent violence," "many people dex of "violence for social change." Class II
learn only through violence," and "when a per-
son harms you, you should turn the other Related Publication:
cheek and forgive him." Respondents were Blumenthal, Monica D., Robert L Kahn,
also asked for their views on the roles of Frank M. Andrews, and Kendra B. Head
courts and police agencies in combating Justifying violence: Attitudes of American
crime. Then, after a number of demographic men. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for So-
and socioeconomic variables (education, cial Research, 1972.
age, region of the country), the subset con-
cludes with a number of derived indices of vio-
lence attitudes which draw upon survey ques-
tions to form general patterns. These derived
Indices include attitudes toward retributive jus- CBS News
tice, self-defense, kindness, suspicion, and CBS News "48 Hours" gun poll, March
trust. Finalty, several summary measures 1989
gauge the respondents' general approval of
violence for social control and social change (ICPSR 9233)
purposes. (See ICPSR 3504 for full file.)
Summary: This data collection consists of re-
sponses to a nationwide survey of Issues sur-
rounding assault weapons. Topics covered in-
Blumenthal, Monica D., Robert L. Kahn, clude legislation regulating the Importation,
sale, and manufacture of assault weapons,
and Frank M. Andrews the sale and use of handguns, and the Na-
Justifying violence: Attitudes of tional Rifle Association. Respondents also
Ame:-Ican men, 1969 were asked to rate the performance of
George Bush as president and to specify
(ICPSR 3504) what they thought was the most Important
problem facing the country. Background Infor-
This survey of attitudes of American men re- mation on respondents Includes political party
garding violence was conducted In the sum- affiliation, sex, age, education, firearm owner-
mer of 1969 by the Survey Research Center ship, and race. Class III
of the Institute for Social Research at The Uni-
versity of Michigan. Tne survey included re- Universe: Adults aged 18 and over in the
sponses from 1,374 men, aged 16-64, drawn United States.
from the Survey Research Center's national
sample of dwellings. The investigators exam- Sampling: Stratified random digit dialing.
ined the level of violence which respondents
viewed as justified to accomplish social con- Note: This file contains a weight variable that
trol and social change and emphasized the must be used in any analysis. Tho data con-

4 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


tain blanks. Telephone exchanges have been dents have been blanked for reasons of
recoded to '999' for reasons of confidentiality. confidentiality.

Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- Extent of collection: 1 data file


readable documentation
Card image data format
Card image data format
rectangular file structure
rectangular file structure 978 cases
663 cases 77 variables
43 variables 80·unit-long record
80-unlt-long record 3 records per case
3 records per case

CBS News/The New York Times


CBS News/The New York Times
CBS NewslNew York T1mes abortIon
CBS NewslNew York Times abortIon polls, September-October 1989
poll, July 1989
(ICPSR 9491)
(lCPSR 9488)
Summary: This data collection focuses on
Summary: In this nationwide survey on abor- abortion issues. Respondents were asked
tion issues, respondents were asked whether whether they approved of the July Supreme
there were more advantages to being a man Court decision in Webster vs. Reproductive
or woman in our society, whether abortion Health Services, whether abortion should be
should be legal or Illegal, whether they ap- legal and under what circumstances (e.g.,
proved of the recent Supreme Court decision possibility of birth defects, rape, unmarried
regarding abortion, and if they knew the ef- mo,therhood, health risk to the woman, age of
fects of this decision. Respondents were thfl female, and whether the pregnancy would
asked under what circumstances they force a teenager to quit high school or a pro·
thought abortion should be legal (e.g., possi- fesslonal woman to interrupt her career), and
bility of birth defects, rape, unmarried mother- whether they favored or opposed possible re-
hood, health risk to the woman, age of the fe- strictions on abortion, such as requiring paren-
male, and whether the pregnancy would force tal consent and prohibiting public employees
a teenager to quit high school or a profes- or hospitals from performing abortions. In ad-
sional women to interrupt her career), and dition, respondents' opinions were sought
whether they favored or opposed possible re- concerning use of public funds for abortion,
strictions on abortion such as requiring paren- child care costs, adoption services for un-
tal consent and prohibiting public employees wanted children, whether their vote choices
or hospitals from performing abortions. In ad- were affected by a candidate's stand on abor-
dition, respondents' opinions were sought tion, government regulation of abortion, the
concerning government regulation of abor- reasonableness/extremism of pro- and anti-
tion, the reasonableness/extremism of pro- abortionists, whether abortion was murder,
and anti-abortionists, whether abortion was and abortion as a form of birth control. In all
murder, and the Importance of the women's surveys, respondents were asked If they ap-
movement In the United States. Background proved of George Bush's handling of the
information on respondents Includes marital presidency. A more detailed evaluation of
status, parental status, political party affili- Bush's performance in specific areas as well
ation, age, income, sex, religious preference, as Bush's relationship with Congress, impor-
education, and race. Class IV tant problem::l facing the natiOtl, taxes, and
United States aid to Eastern Europe and the
Universe: Adults aged 18 and over In the Soviet Union also were addressed In the Na-
United States. tional Survey (Part 1). Background informa-
tion on respondents inclUdes registered voter
Sampling: Stratified random digit dialing. status, 1988 presidential vote choice, political
party affiliation, age, income, sex, religious
Note: This file contains a weight variable that preference, education, and race. Class IV
must be used In any analysis. The data con-
tain blanks. Telephone exchanges have beer. Universe: Adu!ts aged 1Band ovoc.
recoded to '999' and the names of respon-

Attitude surveys 5
Sampling: Stratified random digit dialing. Part 7
Texas
Note: These files contain a weight variable rectangular file structure
that must be used in any analysis. The data 742 cases
contain blanks. Telephone exchanges have 63 variables
been receded to '999' for reasons of SO-unit-long record
confidentiality. 2 records per case

Extent of collection: 7 data files

Card image data format


CBS News/The New York Times
Part 1 CBS News! New York Times drug poll,
National September 1989
rectangular file structure
1,347 cases (ICPSR 9489)
100 variables
SO-unit-Iong record Summary: This data collection Is a general
3 records per case survey of drug problems in the United States.
Topics covered include natIonal efforts to com-
Part 2 bat drug problems, neighborhood drug sales,
California testing students and workers for drugs, treat-
rectangular file structure ment of those convicted of drug offenses,
747 cases sending troops to Colombia to fight drug traf-
63 variables ficking, arrest policies for drug use and other
SO-unit-long record crimes in inner cities, and treatment of indi-
2 records per case viduals by the court system. The survey also
asked about views on homeless people and
Part 3 spending for AIDS treatment. Background In-
Aorida formation on respondents includes political
rectangular file structure party affiliation, parental status, age, income,
630 cases sex, religious preference, education, and
63 variables race. Class IV
SO-unit-long record
2 records per case Universe: Adults aged 1S and over in United
States.
Part 4
Illinois Sampling: Stratified random digit dialing.
rectangular file structure
760 cases Note: This file contains a weight variable that
63 variables must be used in any analysis. The data con-
SO-unit-Iong record tain blanks. Telephone exchanges have been
2 records per case recoded to '999' for reasons of confidentiality.
Part 5 Extent of collection: 1 data file
Ohio
rectangular file structure Card image data format
744 cases
63 variables rectangular file structure
SO-unit-Iong record 824 cases
2 records per case SO variables
SO-unit-long record
Part 6 3 records per case
Pennsylvania
rectangular file structure
S79 cases
63 variables
SO-unit-Iong record
2 records f,i:~r case

6 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


CBS News/The New York Times rectangular file structure
1,515 cases
CBS News/New York TImes monthly 124 variables
poll, March-April 1990 SO-unit-long record
3 records per case
(lCPSR 9498)

Summary: This data collec~on is part of a con-


tinuing series of monthly surveys that evalu-
ate the Bush presidency and solicit opinions Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research
on a variety of poli~cal and social Issues. Top-
ics covered Include foreign policy, the drug Reactions to crime project, 19n
problem, the environment, the federal budget [Chicago, Philadelphia, San
deficit, term limits for members of the House Francisco): Survey on fear of crime
of Representatives, the political party most and citizen behavior
likely to promote prosperity, the political party
that cares most about the needs and prob- (ICPSR 8162)
IElms of Blacks, Bush's concern for the needs
and problems ot Blacks, the peace dividend, This study was sponsored by \he United States
capital punishment, relations with the Soviet Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
Union and Uthuanla, financial assistance to tice. The grant number Is 7S-NI-AX-0057.
Uthuanla and to countries In latin America
that have turned toward democracy, the Cold Summary: This survey was conducted by the
War, German reunification, and troop levels In Center for Urban Affalrs at Northwestern Uni-
Western Europe. Additionalo/, respondents versity. Its purpose was to gather information
were questioned regarding government fund- for two investigations which analyzed the im-
ing of day care services and long-term medi- pact of crime on the lives of city dwellers.
cal care, national health insurance, abortion, These were the Reactions to Crime (RTC)
their party preferences in the 1990 election Project which was supported by the U.S. De-
for House of Representatives and In the 1992 partment of Justice's National Institute of Jus-
presidential election, and their opinions of tice as part of its Research Agreements Pro-
George Bush, Dan Quayle, Ronald Reagan, gram, and the Rape Project which was
Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, the Republi- supported by the National Center for the Pre-
can and Democratic parties, and Mlkhall Gor- vention and Control of Rape, a SUb-division of
bachev. Demographic Information collected in- the National Institute of Mental Health. Both
cludes sex, age, race, education, family projects were concerned with individual be-
income, religion, ethnicity, political orientation, havior and collective reactions to crime. The
party preference, voting behavior, recycling Rape Project was specifically concerned with
habits, day care enrollment, parental status, sexual assault and its consequences for the
health Insurance status, and labor union lives of women. The survey was carried out
membership. Class IV by the Market Opinion Research Corporation
between October and December, 1977, using
Universe: Adults aged 18 and over in the a telephone interview scheme. Questionnaire
United States. preparation and initial pretesting, along with
all sampling and telephone number prepara-
Sampling: Stratified random digit dialing. tion, was conducted at Northwestern. The
three cities selected for study were Chicago,
Note: The data contain a weight variable that Phils.delphia, and San Francisco. A total of
must be used in any analysis. The data con- ten neighborhoods were chosen from these
tain blanks. Telephone exchanges have been cities along a number of dimensions-ethnic-
recoded to '999' and the names of respon- fty. class, crime, and levels of organizational
dents have been blanked for reasons of activity. In addition, a small city-wide sample
confidentiality. was drawn from each city. General topics cov-
ered include how individuals band together to
Extent of collection: 1 data file deal with crime problems, Individual re-
sponses to crime such as property marking or
Card Image data format the installation of locks and bars, and the im-
pact of fear of crime on day-to-day behavior,
for example, shopping and recreational pat-
terns. Respondents were asked several ques-
tions which called for self-reports of behavior;
these include questions about events and

Attitude surveys 7
conditions In their home areas, their relation- ogy and social deviance. Information was ob-
ship to their neighbors, who they know and tained from 1,504 respondents In the form of
visit around their homes, and What they watch 222 variables. The data were collected by the
on TV and read in the newspapers. Also In- NORC as the second In a series of General
cluded were a number of questions measur- Social Surveys. The survey was administered
Ing respondents' perceptions of the extent of in March 1973 to a cross-section national
crime in their communities, whether they sample of adults 18 years of age or older.
knew someone who had been a victim, and The data were obtained from the Roper Cen-
what they had done to reduce their own ter for Public Opinion Research. Class I
chances of being victirnlzed. Data are avail-
able in both OSIRIS and card-image formats,
with machine-readable documentation. There
are approximately 200 variables for each of Davis, James A.
the 5,121 cases. Class II
General social survey, 1974
(lCPSR 7341)
Davis, James A. As in 1972 and 1973, the 1974 Interview in-
General social survey, 1972 cludes items selected by the National Opinion
Research Center (NORC) staff and an advi-
(ICPSR 7309) sory panel of sociologists as "mainstream" in-
terests of academic sociology. In addition to
In addition to the standard personal charac- standard personal data items, the 1974 sur-
teristic Items, the survey covers items viewed vey covers such areas of Interest as the fam-
by the National Opinion Research Center ily, soclo-economlc status, social mobility, and
(NORC) staff and an advisory panel of soci- morale. About two-thirds of the questlonnalre
ologists as "mainstream" interests of modern probed for attitudes and opinions concerning
academic sociology. The interview covers the qualities of a job, satisfaction with life, roles of
areas of stratification, the family, race rela- women, birth control and abortion, sex rela-
tions, social control, civil liberties, and morale. tions, race relations, social control Issues,
A major objective of the project was the repli- and civil liberties. Information was obtained
cation of questions which have appeared in from 1,484 respondents In the form of 240
previous national surveys. Information was variables. The data were collected by the
obtained from 1,613 respondents in the form NORC as the third in a five-year series of
of 123 variables The data were collected by General Social Surveys. The survey was ad-
the NORC as the first in a five year series of ministered in March 1974 to a national cross-
General Social Surveys. The survey was ad- section sample of adults 18 years of age or
ministered in February-April 1972 to a na- older. The data were obtained from the Roper
tional cross-section sample of adults 18 years Center for Public Opinion Research. Class I
of age and older. The data were obtained
from the Roper Center for Public Opinion
Research. Class I
Davis, James A.
General social survey, 1975
Davis, James A. (ICPSR 7367)
General social survey, 1973
The survey covers items viewed by the Na-
(ICPSR 7315) tional Opinion Research Center (NORC) staff
and an advisory panel of sociologists as
The survey covers items viewed by the Na- "mainstream" Interests of modern academic
tional Opinion Research Center (NORC) staff sociology. In addition to standard personal
and an advisory panel of sociologists as data items, the 1975 survey covers such ar-
"mainstream" interests of modern academic eas of interest as race relations, the family, so-
sociology. As in the 1972 survey, the interview cial control, leisure activities, education, mor-
covers the areas of socioeconomic status and als, violence, and pornography. information
social mobility, intrafamlly relations, life cycle was obtained from 1,490 respondents in the
related changes in behavior, racial attitudes, form of apprOXimately 102 variables. The
social control, civil liberties, and morale. Addi- data were collected by the NORC as the
tional questions were added dealing with ecol- fourth In a five-year series of General Social

8 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


SUrveys. The survey was administered In Note: A block of 17 variables out of the 20 In
March and April of 1975 to a national cross- the Vignette File Is repeated 10 times per re-
section sample of adults 18 years of age and cord (respondent), once for each vignette.
older. The data were obtained from the Roper
Center for Public Opinion Research. Class I Extent of collection: 2 data tiles + SPSS con-
trol cards

logical record length data format, and card


Image data format with SPSS control cards
Davis, James A. and Tom W. Smtth
General social surveys, 1972·1986: Part 1
[Cumulative flle1 Cumula.tive file, 1972·1986
rectangular file structure
(ICPSR 8609) 20,056 cases
1,016 variables
Summary: The General Social Survey has 80-unlt-long record
been conducted by the National Opinion Re- 18 records per case
search Center annually since 1972 except for
the years 1979 and 1981. The Roper Center Part 2
for Public Opinion Research has prepared a Supplemental vignette file
cumulative dataset which merges thirteen rectangular file structure
years of the General Social Survey Into a sin- 1,470 cases
gle file, with each year constituting a subfile. 20 variables
The content of each year's survey changes 320-unlt-long record
slightly as some items are added to or de- 1 record per case
leted from the Interview schedule. The most
notable addition to the 1986 wave of the sur-
vey was a group of questions related to the
feminization of poverty. Respondents were Davis, James A. and Tom W. Smfth
asked if they had ever received income from
various governmental assistance programs or General social surveys, 1972·1987:
from alimony or child support payments. Atti- [Cumulative file]
tudes toward welfare were also probed
through agreGment or disagreement with a se- (ICPSR 8865)
ries of statements concerning the welfare sys-
tem. On this same subject, factorial vignettes Summary: The General Social Survey has
were conducted In 1986 and are included as been conducted by the National Opinion Re-
a supplemental file to this collection. These search Center annually since 1972 except for
vignettes, which describe hypothetical situ- the years 1979 and 1981. The Roper Center
ations presented In brief descriptive pas- for Public Opinion Research has prepared a
sages, required each respondent to evaluate cumulative dataset which merges 14 years of
ten different sets of circumstances relating to the General Social Survey into a single file,
family life md the need for publio assistance. with each file constituting a subtile. The con-
Sevftl of the vignettus related to the conditions tent of each year's survey changes slightly as
of young families and three pertained to older some items are added to or deleted from the
women. The respondent's task was to deter- interview schedule. AnnUal topical modules
mine whether or not the family's income designed to Investigate new issues or to ex-
should be augmented with government assis- pand the coverage of an existing subject
tance. Each record in the supplementary file have been part of the GSS since 1984. The
contains all the choioes made by a single re- 1987 topical module concerns socio-political
spondent to all ten vIgnettes. Class IV participation. The 1986 topic was social sup-
port and included questions about contact
Universe:Totai noninstitutionatized English- with family and friends as well as hypothetical
speaking population of the United States, 18 questions about where one would turn in
years of age or older, case of problems. The 1985 topic was the
role of government, including questions on
Sampling: Modified probability sample with civillibertles and law enforcement, education
quotas at block level in 1972-1974. One-half and parenting, economic regulation, and so-
block quota and one-half full probability sam- cial welfare and inequality. The GSS has also
ple in 1975 and 1976. Full probability sample been expanded In recent years by adding a
since 1977. cross-national collaboration between the
United States, Britain, Germany, Italy, and

Attitude surveys 9
Austria. Data from this multinational collabora- Universe: English speaking persons aged 18
tion are being released in the 1972-1987 cu- and ova', living in non-institutional arrange-
mUlative data set. Class IV ments in the United States.

Universe: English speaking persons 18 years Sampling: National Opinion Research Center
of age or ovr!r, living in noninstitutional ar- multistage area probability national sample.
rangements within the United States.
Note: Data for surveys contained In previous
Sampling: National Opinion Research Center cumulative flies remain SUbstantively the
muitistage area probability national sample. same, while particulars of record structure
have changed to accommodate the inclusion
Extent of collection: 1 data file + SPSS con- of 1988 data.
trol cards
Extent of collection: 1 data file + SPSS con-
Card image data format with SPSS control trol cards
cards
Card image data format with SPSS control
rectangular file structure cards
21,875 cases
1,157 variables rectangular file structure
80-unit-long record 23,356 cases
21 records per case 1,327 variables
80-unit-long record
26 records per case

Davis, James A. and Tom W. Smith


General social surveys, 1972-1988: Davis, James A. and Tom W. Smith
[Cumulative file]
General social surveys, 1972-1989:
(iCPSR 8990) [Cumulative file]
Summary: The General Social Survey (GSS) (lCPSR 9275)
has been conducted by the National Opinion
Research Center annually since 1972 except Summary: The General Social Survey (GSS)
for the years 1979 and 1981. The Roper Cen- has been conducted by the National Opinion
ter for Public Opinion Research has prepared Research Center annually since 1972 except
a cumulative dataset that merges 15 years of for the years 1979 and 1981. The Roper Cen-
the GSS into a single file, with each year or ter for Public Opinion Research has prepared
survey constituting a subtile. The content of a cumulative dataset that merges 16 years of
each year's survey changes slightly as some the GSS into a single file, with each year or
items are added to or deleted from the inter- survey constituting a subtile. The content of
view schedule. Annual topical modules desi- each year's survey changes slightly as some
gned to investigate new issues or to expand items are added to or deleted from the inter-
the coverage of an existing subject have view schedule. Topical modules designed to
been part of the GSS since 1984. The 1988 investigate new issues or to expand the cover-
topical module concerns religiOUS socializa- age of an existing subject have been part of
tion, behaviors, and beliefs. Other topics cov- the GSS since 1977. The 1989 topical mod-
ered have been sociopolitical participation ule concerns occupational prestige. Other top-
(1987), the feminization of poverty (1986), so- ics covered have Included religious socializa-
cial networks (1985), and the role of the mili- tion, behaviors, and beliefs (1988), socio-
tary (1984). The GSS also has expanded in political participation (1987), the feminization
recent years by adding a crossnational com- of poverty (1986), social networks (1985),
ponent. In 1985 the first multinational collabo- and the role of the military (1982 and 1984).
ration between the United States, Britain, Ger- The GSS also has expanded In recent years
many, Italy, and Austria focused on the role of by adding a crossnational component. In
government. Other topics addressed have 1985 the first multinational collaboration be-
been social support (1986), and social in- tween the United States, Britain, Germany, It-
equality (1987). Class IV aly, and Austria focused on the role of govern-
ment. Other topics addressed have included
social support (1986) and social inequality
(1987). These data are released as part of

10 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


the 1972-1989 cumulative dataset, along wi.th galn a deeper understanding of the wide
a 1987 module, never before avallable, ex- range of activities In which the American pub-
ploring the Impact on the family of the chang- lic engages to be secure from crime. In par-
Ing labor force participation of women. ticular, this survey was designed to Identify
Class IV the scope of anti-crime activities and Investi-
gate the processes which facilitate or Inhibit
Universe: English speaking persons 18 years the public's involvement in those activities.
of age or over, living In noninstitutional ar- The geographical area for the survey was de-
rangements within the United States. fined by the "commuting basin" of Chicago,
excluding several Independent cities and their
Sampling: National Opinion Research Center suburbs (e.g., Aurora, Waul(egan, and Joliet)
national probability sample. Block quota sam- on the northern and western fringes of that
pling was used in 1972-1974 and for half of area, and excluding all areas In Indiana. A
1he 1975 and 1976 surveys. Full probability "modified random digit dialing with enrich-
sampling was employed In 1977, 1980, 1982- ment" procedure was used to generate a total
1989, and In half of 1he 1975 and 1976 surveys. of 5,346 prospective sample numbers. Inter-
viewing was carried out by the Survey Re-
Note: Data for surveys contalned In previous search Laboratory at the University of illinois
cumulative files remains substantively the tlurlng June through August, 1979. A total of
same, while particulars of record structure 1,803 Interviews were completed. Information
have changed to accommodate the inclusion was gathered on people's opinions toward
of 1989 data. ICPSR is making the data avall- safety, their Involvement with "crime preven-
able In both LRECL and Card Image formats. tion" activities and the quality of life In their
Users should note that the SPSS Control neighborhoods. In addition, data were assem-
Cards define the data In LRECL format, while bled from Census Bureau and police reports
the printed codebook describes the data In for each community area In which respon-
Card Image format. The codebo'ok and con- dents lived In the years Immediately preced-
tro/ cards can be used together by matching Ing the surve,'. Data are avallable in both
on variable names or the cantrC',1 cards can be OSIRIS and card·image formats, with ma-
altered to define card Image data chine-readable documentation. There are
219 variables for each of the 1,803 cases,
Extent of collection: 1 data file + SPSS con- Class II
tro/ cards
Logical record length data format, and card
Image data format with SPSS control cards
Mendelsohn, Harold and Garrett J. O'Keefe
rectangular file structure MedIa crIme prevention campaIgn In
24,893 cases the United States, 1980
1,426 variables
2,24O-unlt-long record (ICPSR 8050)
28 records per case
This study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Jus~ce, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number is 78-NI-AX-0105.
Lavrakas, Paul J. and Wesley G. Skogan
Summary: The "Crime Prevention Survey"
Citizen particlpat/on and community was collected as part of an ambitious project
crime prevention, 1979: Chicago to evaluate the effects of programs intended
metropolitan area survey to encourage crime prevention among the
public. It Was designed by Drs. Harold Men-
(ICPSR 8086) delsohn and Garret O'Keefe, both of the Cen-
ter for Mass Communications Research and
T1is study was sponsored by the United States Policy at the University of Denver. The Roper
Depc:wtment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- Organization performed the sampling and
tice. The grant number is 78-NI-AX-011. field work In April 1980 utilizing a personal In-
terview scheme. The basic sample consisted
Summary: This survey was conducted as part of 1,454 interviews. This survey focused on
of the "Citizen Participation and Community respondents' reports of their media use, their
Crime Prevention" project at the Center for Ur- perception about crime and its nature, and
ban Affalrs and Policy Research, Northwest- the number and nature of neighborhood can·
ern University. The project was conducted to tacts they had. Its original Intent was to evalu-

Attitude surveys 11
I
ate the Impact of a national crime prevention The New York Times
campalgn which was In progress In 1980.
There are 352 variables In the data Class II New York 77mes race relations survey,
March 1987: New York City
(ICPSR 9214)
National Opinion Research Center Summary: This survey examines the attitudes
of New Yorkers toward race relations. Topics
General social survey, 1976 covered Include the racial composition of the
(lCPSR 7398) respondent's neighborhood and friends, the
most Important white and black leaders In
The 1976 survey replicates almost ali Items New York City, police brutality, discrimination
that have appeared In at least two other sur- on racial grounds for housing and Jobs, crime,
veys In this series. Major emphasis Is placed and Important problems facing New York City
on the attitudes and opinions of the respon- such as drugs, transportation, the poor and
dents on Issues such as the faml~, socio- homeless, corruption, and Illegal aliens. Addi-
economic status, social mobility, sooial con- tional questions asked of respondents Include
trol, race relations, sex relations, and morale. If they approved or disapproved of the way
In addition, Information on the respondents' Ed Koch handled his Job as maya, If New
partisan Identifications and thalr 1972 presl- York City courts were tougher on blacks or
dentlal vote Is Included. Information was ob- whites, If the level of racial discrimination had
tained from 1,499 respondents In the form of Increased or decreased, and If a preference
240 variables. The data were collected by the in hiring or promotion should be given to
National Opinion Research Center as the last blacks. Background Information on Individuals
In a five-year series of General Social Sur- Includes party affiliation, age, Income, sex, relig-
veys. The survey was administered In March Ious preference, education, and ra:::e. Class III
and April of 1976 to a national cross-section
sample of adults 18 years of age and older. Universe: Adults In New York City.
The data were obtalned from the Roper Cen-
ter for Public Opinion Research. Class I Sampling: Random sample.

Note: The data contain blanks. There are mUl-


tiple records per case.
National Opinion Research Center Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
General social survey, 1977 readable documentation

(lCPSR 7573) Card image data format

The 1977 study Is a continuation of the Na- rectangular file structure


tional Data Program for the Social Sciences. 1,063 cases
Most of the questions have appeared In pre- 81 variables
vious national surveys between 1945 and 80-unlt-long record
1976. The content areas covered In this sur- 3 records per case
vey concern the fami~, socle-economlc
status, social mobility, social control, race rela- Related Publication:
tions, attitudes towards sex and sexual materi- Freedman, Samuel G.
als, and morals. The respondent's party Identi- "New York race tension Is rising despite
fication and voting behavior are also included. gains." The New York Times (March 29,
Information was obtained from 1,530 respon- 1987).
dents in the form of 257 variables. The data
were col/ected by the National Opinion Re-
search Center as part of a series of General
Social Surveys beginning In 1972. The survey
was administered In March and April of 1977
to a national Gross-section sample of adults
18 years of i:!.ge and older. The data were ob-
tained from the Roper Center for Public Opin-
Ion Research. Class I

12 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Richardson, Richard, et al. Extent of collection: 1 data file
Public aHltudes toward the criminal Card image data format
Justice system and criminal
victimization In North Carolina, 1971 rectangUlar file structure
1,993 cases
(ICPSR 7670) 250 variables
80·unit·long record
This study was conducted In 1971 by the Insti- 7 records per case
tute for Research In Social Science at the Uni-
versity of North Carolina. Research for this
project was funded primarily by the North
Carolina Bureau of Local Affalrs, Division of
Law and Order, with support from other agen- WABC·TV/New York Dally News
cies. The purpose of the study (conducted by WABC-TVINew York Dally News race
means of a household survey) was to assist
agencies In assessing public attitudes toward relations poll, January 1988
policies In effect or under consideration, and (ICPSR 9187)
to measure crime In the state. Included are
variables concerning citizen attitudes toward Summary: This data collection examines race
crime; the frequency of criminal victimization; relations In New York City. Respondents were
the reporting of crime by victims; public con- asked to name the most Important black
tact with criminal Justice agencies and the atti- leader In New York City and to gIve their opin-
tudes of the citizens of the state toward the Ions on whether Income and living conditions
agencies which are part of the legal Justice were getting better or worse for most blacks
system. A stratified random sample of the and whether there was more or less antl-
noninstitutional population of North Carolina whita/antl·black feeling among members of
was employed. There are 1,140 cases and the other race. In addition, respondents were
approximately 455 variables in the file. asked if they agreed or disagreed with these
Class IV statements: 1) The police and the courts treat
blacks as fairly as they treat whites, 2) If
blacks tried harder they could be just as well
off as whites, 3) Discrimination has unfalrly
Tittle, Charles R. held blacks down but many problems today
are brought on by blacks themselves, and 4)
Public aHitudes toward deviant Blacks have been held back because Jews
behavior, 1972: Iowa, New Jersey, and control the educational system In the city. Ad-
Oregon ditional topics covered Include the Howard
Beach incident in which several white youths
(ICPSR 8480) were found guilty of manslaughter in the
death of a black youth, the selection of the
Summary: The specific purpose of this study black edUcator Richard Green as chancellor
was to gaUler data concerning Individuals' per- of the city schoolS, and the respondent's opin-
ceptions of the likelihood of being caught and ion of several public figures. Background Infor-
punished for committing various minor of- mation on respondents includes religion,
fenses. However, this study also provides race, sex, and borough of residence. Class IV
data on several other topics ranging from the
respondent's opinion on the importance of fol- Universe: Adults aged 18 and over living in
lowing social norms to self-reports of deviant households with telephones In New York City.
behavior. Class IV
Sampling: Random digit dialing.
Universe: Individuals aged 15 and over from
New Jersey, Iowa, and Oregon. Note: The data contain blanks. A weight vari-
able is Included that must be used in any
Sampling: Samples of the population aged 15 analysis.
and over in New Jersey, Iowa, and Oregon
were drawn by using area probability tech- Extent of collection: 1 data file
nlqu(;!s to identify households. Individual re-
spondents within identified households were Card Image data format
then randomly selected for interviews and two
callbacks were used to maximize the possibil-
ity of including those specific Individuals.

Attitude surveys 13
rectangular file structure Part 2
505 cases Call back, June 26
27 variables rectangular file structure
80-unlt-long record 96 cases
2 records per case 83 variables
80·unlt·long record
2 records per case

Part 3
WOBS-TV News/The New York Times Upstate New York, June 21·25
WCBS-TV News/New York TImes race rectangular fila structure
relations poll, June 1988 455 casas
71 variables
(lCPSR 9106) 80-unlt·long record
2 records per case
Summary: This data collection consists of re-
sponses to a survey of social issues In the
New York City area. Part 1 covers a variety of
topics Including race relations, leadership WOBS·TV News/The New York Times
among the black community, treatment of Indi-
viduals by courts and police, opinions of politi- WCBS·TV NewslNew York TImes race
cal leaders and public figures, and the ban on relations poll, June 1990
smoking In public places. In addition respon-
dents were asked a series of questions con- (ICPSR 9502)
cerning the Tawana Brawley case, in which a
black teenager accused a group of white men Summary: This data collection Is a survey of
of abducting and sexually molesting her in social Issues In the New York City area. Re·
Dutchess County. In Part 2, respondents who spondents were asked for their opinions on
had said they thought Brawley's advisers the quality of life In New York City, the job be·
were lying about the incident were recon- long done by Marlo Cuomo as governor and
tacted and again asked their opinions of David Dinkins as mayor, and the most impor-
these Individuals. Part 3, asked of Dutchess tant problem facing New York City that the
County residents, replicated the Part 1 ques- mayor needed to address. Addltlonallnforma-
tionnaire, with the exception of several ques- tion was gathered from Black respondents
tions specific to New York City. Background In- concerning race relations. Items covered
formation on respondents Includes political were quality of the city's economy, the
party affiliation, age, Income, sex, religious mayor's handling of race relations In the city,
preference, education, and race. Class III leadership among the Black community, treat-
ment of Individuals by courts and police,
Universe: Adults aged 18 and over In New neighborhood safety of Individuals, criminal
York City and Dutchess County. victimization, media Involvement In race rela-
tions, and specific Incidents of racial Insults.
Sampling: Stratified random digit dialing. Background Information on respondents In-
cludes political party affiliation, ethnlclty,
Note: These files contain weig,t variables that amount of media usage, age, Income, sex, reo
must be used in any analysis. The data contain ligious preference, education, and race.
blanks. Telephone exchanges have been re- Class IV
coded to '999' for reasons of confidentiality.
Universe: Adults ~ed 18 and over In New York
Extent of collection: 3 data files + machine- City.
readable documentation
Sampling: Stratified random digit dialing.
Card image data format
Note: This file contains a weight variable that
Part 1 must be used In any analysis. The data con-
New York City, June 21-25 tain blanks. Telephone exchanges have been
rectangular file structure recoded to '999' and the names of respon-
676 cases dents have been blanked for reasons of
78 variables confidentiality.
80.unit·long record
2 records per case Extent of collection: 1 data file

14 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Card Image data format Washington Post
rectangular file structure Washington Post Mayor Barry verdict
1,047 cases poll,August1990
90 variables
BO·unlt·long record (ICPSR 9555)
2 records per case
Summary: This data collection focuses on Is·
sues surrounding the verdict In the trial of Dis·
trict of Columbia'S mayor Marlon Barry. Re·
spondents were asked If they thought Barry
Washington Post had received a fair trial, If the Jury had done a
good Job, and If the federal government's In·
Washington Post Mayor Barry poll, vestlgatlon of Barry that led to the Indictments
January 1990 was racially motivated. Respondents also
(ICPSR 9437) were asked If they thought news coverage of
the Barry case was generally fair, If the trial In·
Summary: This surve,' was conducted follow· creased or decreased racial tensions In the
Ing the arrest of District of Columbia mayor District, If Barry should have to serve some
Marlon Barry on drug charges. Respondents time In Jail, If Barry should run for mayor or
were asked If they had read or heard any· City Council, If Barry should be re·trled on
thing about the {S.1~est, It they thought Barry some of the charges that the Jury could not
should resign, If tederallnvestlgators would or reach a verdict on, If United States Attorney
would not have tried harder to arrest Barry If Jay Stephens should resign, and If Mayor
he had been white, and If they thought Barry Marlon Barry should resign. Background Infor·
was or was not using drugs on the night In mation on respondents Includes registered
question. Respondents also were asked for voter status, section of residence In the Dis·
whom they would vote If the mayoral primary trlct, age, education, race, sex, and Income.
were held that day, toward which candidate Class IV
they were leaning, whether they would vote
for Jesse Jackson If he were a candidate, and Universe: Adults aged 18 and over who were
whether they would vote for Jesse Jackson or residents of the District of Columbia and were
Maurice Turner If the general election were living In households with telephones.
held that day. Background Information on reo
spondents Includes political alignment, regis· Sampling: Households were selected by ran·
tered voter status, age, race, sex, and In· dom digit dialing. Within household, the reo
come. Class IV spondent selected was the adult living In the
household who last had a birthday was at
Universe: Adults aged 1B and over living In home at the time of the Interview, ~d was a
households with telephones In the District of resident of the District.
Columbia
Note: The data contain blanks and alphabetic
Sampling: Households were selected by ran· characters. A weight variable Is Included that
dom digit dialing. Within household, the reo must be used In any analysis.
spondent selected was the adult living In the
household who last had a birthday was at Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine·
home at the time of the interview, ~nd was a readable documentation
resident of the District.
Card Image data format
Note: The data contain blanks and alphabetic
characters. rectangular file structure
603 cases
Extent of collection: 1 data file 37 variables
80·unlt·long record
Card Image data format 1 record per case

rectangular file structure


661 cases
34 variables
BO·unit·long record
1 record per case

Attitude surveys 15
Community studies

American Instftutes for Research Part 3


Acts.2
National evaluation of the community rectangular file structure
anti-crime program, 1979-1991 126 cases
240 variables
(ICPSR 8704) aO-unlt.long record
4 records per case
Summary: This survey Is part of the Commu·
nlty Antl·Crlme (CAC) and Comprehensive Port 4
CrIme Prevention (CCP) projects developed Sites
by the Office of Community Antl·Crlms as rectangular file structure
part of the Law Enforcement Assistance Ad· 36 cases
ministration. The survey was designed to 241 variables
Identify the relationship between crime pre· 80-unit-long record
vention and Involvement by the community 4 records per case
and law enforcement agencies. The data In·
clude Information on program start-up, Imple·
mentation, and the community Itself as well
as Information on the specific activities under·
taken by the programs. Class IV Fowler, Floyd J.
Universe: All community antl·crlme programs Residential neighborhood crime
In the United States. control pro}ect: Hartford, Connecticut,
1973,1975-1977,1979
Note: Variables are not numbered
consecutively. (ICPSR 7682)

Extent of collection: 4 data files this study was sponsored by the United
States Department of Justice, Natlonallnsti-
Card Image data format tute of Justice. The grant numbers are 7S-NI·
99·0044, 75-NI-95-0026 and 79-NI·AX-0026.
Part 1
Global Summary: The Hartford project, funded
rectangular file strl)cture through the Hartford Institute of Criminal and
128 cases Social Justice, began In 1973. The program
228 variables was designed to reduce the rates of burglary
80·unlt-Iong record and robbery or purse snatching and the fear
5 records per case of those crimes. These victimization surveys
provide a consistent measure of the rate at
Part 2 which such crimes occur over time. The sur·
Acts.1 veys also provide critical measures of pea·
rectangular file structure pie's fears and concerns about crime. The
128 cases project's most distinctive feature was Its Inte·
171 variables grated approach. Physical design changes
80-unit-long record were planned, carried out, and coordinated
3 records per case with appropriate citizen and police efforts In a
unique three-pronged program. As part of its
extensive evaluation, the center collected resi~
dent survey data on four occasions over a
five year period: 1973, 1975,1976,1977, and
1979. One half of the Interviews were con-
ducted by telephone and one half In person.

Community studies 17
In each survef, except 1979, respondents re- ber of physical characteristics of parceis and
ported on experiences during the preceding blocks in the study neighborhoods, and as
12-month period; in 1979 the time reference the sampling frame for the household survef.
was the past two years. The survey questions The original data were collected by the City of
are very similar from year to year, with 1973 Atlanta Planning Bureau. There are 9,121
being the most unique. Each year there are cases and approximately 80 lJariables in the
sections with questions on victimization, fear, file. The Atlanta SURVEY fUe contains the re-
and perceived risk of being victims of the tar- sults of a household survey administered to a
get crimes, perceptions of and attitudes to- stratified random sample of households within
ward police, neighborhood problems and each of the study neighborhoods. Variables
neighbors, household and respondent charac- here include respondents' attitudes and be-
teristics. There are five files. The 1973 file havior reiated to the neighborhood, fear of
contains 891 cases and approximately 300 crime, avo/dance and protective measures,
variabies. There are 556 cases and approxi- and victimization experiences. Crime rates,
mately 175 variables in the 1975 survef. The land use, and housing characteristics of the
1976 file contains 249 variables for 146 block in which the respondent resides have
cases. This 1976 survey is not an inde- been coded onto each case record. The data
pendent sample as it was based on some of were collected between August and October
the same households interviewed In 1975. of 1980. There are 523 cases and approxl-
The 1977 file contains 358 variables for 885 mateiy 700 variables. Class II
cases, and the 1979 file contains 320 vari-
ables for 623 cases. Class II

Kobrin, Solomon and Leo A. Schuerman


Greenberg, Stephanie Interaction between neighborhood
change and criminal activity, 1979
Characteristics of high and low crime
neighborhoods In Atlanta, 1980 (ICPSR 9056)
(ICPSR 7951) ThIs study was spcnsored by the United States
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
This study was sponsored by the United States tice. The grant number is 78-NI-AX-0127.
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number is 79-NI-AX-0080. Summary: This study was conducted In 1979
at the Social Science Research Institute, Uni-
Summary: This study examines the question versity of Southern California This study ex-
of how some urban neighborhoods maintain plores the relationship between neighborhood
a low crime rate despite their proximity and change and criminal activity between the
similarity to relatively high crime areas. The years 1950 and 1976. The data were aggre-
purpose of the study is to Investigate differ- gated by unique and consistently defined spa-
ences in various dimensions of the concept of tial areas, referred to as dummy tracts or
territoriality (spatial Identity, local ties, social neighborhoods, within Los Angeles County.
cohesion, informal social control) and physi- By combining U.S. Census data and adminis-
cal characteristics (land use, housing, street trative data from several state, county, and lo-
type, boundary characteristics) in three pairs cal agencies, the researchers were able to de-
of neighborhoods in Atlanta, Georgia. The velop measures which tapped the changing
study neighborhoods were selected by locat structural and compositional aspects of each
Ing pairs of adjacent neighborhoods with dis- neighborhood and its interaction with the pat-
tinctly different crlme levels. The criteria for se- terns of juvenile criminal actiVity. The Interac-
lection, other than the difference In crime tion Between Neighborhood Change and
rates and physical adjacency, were compara- Criminal Activity data are available from
ble racial composition and comparable eco- ICPSR In two formats: a card Image file and
nomic status. This data collection is divided an OSIRIS dataset. The OSIRIS dataset con-
Into two files. The Atlanta PLAN file contains sists of a single logical record for each case.
information on every parcei of land within the There are 996 variables for each of 1,142
six neighborhCY.:lds in the study. The variables cases in the file. Class II
Include ownership, type of land use, physical
characteristics, characteristics of structures,
and assessed value of each parcel of land
v.~thin the six neighborhoods. This file was
used in the data analysis to measure a num-

18 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Loftin, Colin Extent of collection: 1 data file
Detroit area study, 1979: A study of OSIRIS data format
metropolitan Issues
rectangular file structure
(IOPSR 9301) 644 cases
473 variables
Summary: Crime and other matters of crimi- 4,257-unlt-long record
nal justice were the main focus of Inquiry for 1 record per case
this Detroit Area Study. Respondents were
asked to report on Incidents of crime against Related Publications:
themselves, relatives, and friends. They also Young, Robert L.
were queried about their fears of being victim- "Perceptions of crime, racial attitudes and
Ized by crime and about measures they had firearms ownership." Social Forces 64
undertaken to protect themselves against (1985),473-486.
crime. In addition, the survey elicited views on Young, Robert L., David McDowall, and Colin
a wide range of criminal justice Issues such Loftin
as the death penalty, the causes of crime and "Collective security and the ownership of
ways to reduce it, the salience of crime as a firearms for protection." Criminology 25
social problem, the legalization of marijuana (1987),47.62.
use, handgun laws, the criminality of certain
acts such as shooting a fleeing burglar, the
construction of new prisons, the Imposition of
new taxes to improve law enforcement, the al-
location of federal funds to police and other McPherson, Marlys, Glenn SlIIoway, and
services, the activities of the police and courts David Frey
Including their fairness toward blacks, and
whether or not convicting the Innocent was Crime, fear, and control In
better than letting the guilty go free. The SUr- neighborhood commercial centers:
vey also sought respondents' views on other Minneapolis and st. Paul, 1970·1982
social issues, such as prayer In public
schools, labor unions, the Equ;al Rights (ICPSR 8167)
Amendment, defense spending, abortion, the
quality of public schools, and affir.mative ac- This study was sponsored by the United States
tion. Additional Information gathered by the Department of Justice, National Inst~ute of Jus-
survey includes du~ation of residence In the tice. The grant number is 8O-IJ-CX-0073.
tri-county area and at the current address,
place of previous residence, moves planned Summary: the major objective of this study
for the future, teleVision viewing habits, which was to examine how both commercial and
newspapers were read, gun ownership, shop- residential characteristics contribute to crime
ping habits, home aicd motor vehicle owner- and how these affect reactions to crime In
ship, use of public transportation, travel to mixed commercial·resldentlal settings. The
work, political and social class affiliation, satis- variables measured were designed to Investi-
faction with neighborhoods and with the tri- gate how physical characteristics of commer-
county area, and information on age, sex, cial centers and demographic characteristics
place of birth, marital status, education, em- of residential areas Interact with crime. The
ployment, occupation, income, religion, race, physical characteristics include type of busi-
ethnlcity, and household composition. Class III nesses, store hours, arrangement of build-
ings, and defensive modifications In the area.
Universe: Adults aged 18 and over residing In The demographic variables Include racial
households located In the Michigan counties composition, average household size and In-
of Oakland, Macomb, or Wayne. come, and percent change of occupancy. The
crime data Include six types of crime: robbery,
Sampling: Multistage area probability sample. burglary, assaUlt, rape, personal theft, and
shoplifting. Class IV
Restrictions: In order to preserve respondent
confidentiality, certain identifying variables are Universe: All commercial Qnd residential ar-
restricted from general dissemination. Aggre- eas in Minneapolis and S1. PaUl.
gations of this information for statistical pur-
poses that preserve the anonymity of individ- Sampling: Sampling was based on three crite-
ual respondents can be obtained from ICPSR ria: percent minority change from 1970 to
in accordance with existing servicing policies. 19aO, an observational measure of disorder

Community st(.Jdies 19
In each commercial center, and person crime Summary: This date, collection was designed
rates for the entire commercial and residential to address the crime problem as a barrier to
area. the economic health of three outlying com-
mercial centers of New York City: Brooklyn,
Extent of collection: 5 data files Fordham Road In the Bronx, and Jamaica
Center In Queens. Included In the survey are
Card image data format variables concerning the respondent's age,
race, gender, family income, length of resi-
Part 1 dence, and personal victimization experience.
Commercial/Residential data Also included are variables pertaining to per-
rectangular file structure ceptions of safety, physical disorder In the
93 cases area, and source of Information about crime
150 variables in the commercial centEr. Class IV
80-unit-Iong record
7 records per case Universe: All residents in New York City com-
mercial districts of downtown Brooklyn, Ford-
Part 2 ham Road in the Bronx, and Jamaica Center
Area data In Queens.
rectangular file structure
24 cases Sampling: A random sample of residents liv-
183 variables ing in the three areas was systematically se-
80-unit-long record lected from the telephone directory.
9 records per case
Restrictions: For reasons of confidentiality,
Part 3 telephone numbers of respondents have
Telephone survey data been removed from the data file.
rectangular file structure
S70 cases Extent of collection: 1 data file
136 variables
SO-unit-long record Card image data format
4 records per case
rectangular file structure
Part 4 610 cases
Interview data 35 variables
rectangular file structure 80-unit-long record
213 cases 1 record per case
138 variables
SO-unit-long record Related Publications:
7 records per case Milder, N.D.
"Reducing the fear of downtown crime"
Part 5 (unpublished summary). Washington, DC:
Pedestrian activity data National Institute of Justice, 1987.
rectangular file structure Citizens Crime Commission of New York City
7,110 cases and Regional Plan Association
11 variables "Downtown safety, security, and economic
SO-unit-Iong record development program" (unpublished final
1 record per case report). Washington, DC: National Institute
of Justice, 1987.

Milder, N. David
Milkman, Raymond H.
Downtown safety, security, and
development In New York City, 1984 Employment services for ex-offenders,
1981-1984: Boston, Chicago, and San
(ICPSR 9326)
Diego
This study was sponsored by the United (ICPSR 8619)
States Department of JUstice, Nationallnsti-
tute ofJustice. The grant numbers are 84-IJ- This study was sponsored by the United States
CX-0006 and 85-IJ-CX-0070. Department of Justice, National Inst~ute of Jus-
tice. The grant number is 8O-IJ-CX-K013.

20 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


J
Summary: This study was conducted to test Minnesota Criminal JUstice System Driving
whether job counselling and placement serv- While Intoxicated Task Force
Ices, accompanied by Intensive follow-up af-
ter placement, would significantly Increase Recidivism among convicted drunk
the effectiveness of employment programs for drivers: Minnesota, 1982
recent prison releases. Data were collected
on personall criminal, and employment back- (ICPSR 8601)
grounds. Information Is also Included on the
type, duration, and pay of previous employ- Summary: This data collection focuses on re-
ment, living arrangements, marital status, cidivism among persons convicted for driving
criminal history, and characteristics of the em- while IntoxicatEd. It contains Information
ployment placement. Class IV about the charging and sentencing of drunk
driving offenders and repeat offenders. Vari-
Universe: Offenders released from federal, ables Include charge, conviction, sentence,
state, or local adult correctional facilities In number of alcohol and non-alcohol related vlo-
Massachusetts, California, and illinois. lations, subsequent action, sex, age, and
date of sentencing. Class IV
Sampling: Random sample.
Universe: All persons convicted of driving
Extent of collection: 3 data files while Intoxicated In the State of Minnesota.

Card image data format Sampling: Defendants were selected on the


basis of those convicted and sentenced to
Part 1 serve time In the county jall and those con-
Bost-on data victed and sentenced to probation or fine.
rectangular file structure
381 cases Extent of collection: 1 data file
183 variables
80-unit-long record Card Image data format
8 records per case
rectangular file structure
Part 2 499 cases
Chicago data 40 variables
rectangular file structure 80-unlt-long record
529 cases 4 records per case
191 variables
80-unit-long record
8 records per case
Nurco, David
Part 3
San Diego data Criminality among narcotic addicts In
rectangular file structure Baltimore: The role of nonnarcotic
305 cases drugs, 1973-1978
191 variables
BO-unit-Iong record (ICPSR 8604)
8 records per case
This study was sponsored by the United
Related Publications: States Department of Justice, National Institute
Milkman, Raymond H. of Justice. The grant number is 82-IJ-CX-0031.
Codebook for the employment services for
ex-offenders field test. The lazar Institute, Summary: This study investigated the fre-
1985. quency with which various nonnarcotic sub-
Timrots, Anita D. stances were used by male narcotic addicts
~An evaluation of employment services for and the relation of these substances to differ-
ex-offenders." Unpublished master's the- ent types of criminal activity during periods of
sis, University of Maryland, no date. active addiction and periods of nonaddictlon.
The variables were designed to facilitate an
analysis of narcotic addicts as crime risks, pat-
terns of nonnarcotic drug use, and the per-
centage of illegal Income addicts obtained
during periods of addiction compared with pe-
riods of nonaddiction. Information is included

Community studies 21
concerning types of narcotic drug use, crime Shaffer, John W., et al.
~erns, and use of mariJtala, cocaine, bar- "Patterns of non-narcotic drug use among
bituates, CI/'lllhetamines, and Iibrlum. Class IV male narcotic addicts." Journal of Drug Is-
sues (In press).
Universe: Population of known narcotic of-
fenders arrested by the Baltimore police de-
partment between 1952 and 1976.

Sampling: The sample consists of 354 male Pennell, Susan, Christine Curtis, and Joel
narcotic addicts who were selected from a Henderson
population of 6,149 known narcotic offenders Guardian angels: CItizen response to
arrested by the Baltimore police department
between 1952 and 1976. The sample was crime In selected cities of the United
stratified by race and year of police contact. states, 1984
These 354 sample addicts were selected be- (ICPSR 8935)
cause they had used addictive narcotic drugs
at least four days per week for a period of
more than one month. The majority of sub- This study was sponsored by the United States
Jects were heroin addicts. Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number is 83-IJ-CX-0037.
Extent of collection: 3 data files + machine-
readable documentation Summary: This study was designed to
assess the effects of the activities of the
Card Image data format Guardian Angels on citizens' fear of crime, in-
cidence of crime, and police officers' percep-
Part 1 tions of the Guardian Angels. The data, which
Crime risk file were collected in several large American cit-
rectangular file structure ies, provide information Useful for evaluating
354 cases the activities of the Guardian Angels from the
approximately 15-18 variables perspectives of transit riders, residents, mer-
80-unit-long record chants, an~ ~olice officers. Respondents who
24 records per case were transit riders ware asked to provide infor-
mation on their knowledge of and contacts
Part 2 with the Angels~ attitudes toward the group,
Drug use file opinions regarding the benefits and effective-
rectangular file structure ness of the group, and law enforcement expe-
354 cases riences. Data for residents and merchants in-
approximately 15-18 variables ciude demographic characteristics, general
80-unit-long record prob!ems in the neighborhood, opinions re-
24 records per case garding crime problems, crime prevention ac-
tivities, fear of crime, knowledge of the An-
g.el~, ~ttitudes toward the group, and
Part 3
Illegal income file Victimization experiences. Class IV
rectangular file structure
354 cases Universe: Part 1: Transit riders in Boston, Chi-
24 variables cago, Cleveland, and New York City. Part 2:
80-unit-long record Patrol officers in Boston, Chicago Dalias
3 records per case New York City, Sacramento, and San Fr~­
cisco. Part 3: Housing units in an area of 86
Related Publications: city blocks in downtown San Diego. Part 4:
Nurco, David N., Ira H. Cisin, and John C Ball Businesses in the downtown San Diego area
"Crime as a source of income for narc~tic that were open between 7 and 11 p.m.
addicts." Journal of Substance Abuse
Treatment 2 (1985), 113-115. Sampling: Part 1: Convenience sample of pa-
Shaffer, John W., et al. trol officers present for duty on date of survey.
"Th~ frequency of non-narcotic drug use
Part 3: Random sampling of housing units.
and its relationship to criminal activity Respondents were selected from within se-
among IlCl!'cotic addicts." Comprehensive lected housing units. Part 4: Random selec-
Psychiatry26:6 (1985), 558-566. tion of businesses.

Extent of collection: 4 data files

22 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Card Image data format part of a stratified sample of Detroit area resi-
dents. The sample provided adequate repre·
Part 1 sentation of both Detroit Itself and of the sur·
Transit riders rounding area, and of racial and economic
rectangular file structure subgroups. The sample was taken from the
2S6cases geographic area defined as the 1971 Detroit
22 variables SMSA, which Includes Wayne, Oakland, and
SO-unit-long record Macomb counties. There were 1,194 respon-
1 record per case dents who answered questions In face·to-
face Interviews lasting approximately 75 min-
Part 2 utes each. The data were made available by
Police officers the principal Investigators and the Survey Re-
rectangular file structure search Center, the Institute for Social Re-
444 cases search, The University of Michigan. There are
26 variables 1,477 variables. Class III
SO-unlt-Iong record
1 record per case Related Publications:
Marans, Robert W., and J. Mark Fly
Part 3 "Recreation and the quality of urban life:
Residents Recreation resources, behaviors and
rectangular file structure eValuation of people In the Detroit Re-
130 cases gion." Ann Arbor, MI: ISR Research Re-
105 variables port Series, 19S1.
SO-unlt-Iong record Rodgers, W.L.
2 records per case "Density, crOWding, and satisfaction with
the residential environment." Soc/allnd/ca-
Part 4 tors Research 10 (19S1), 75-102.
Merchants Rodgers, W.L.
rectangular file structure "Residential satisfaction In relationship to
110 cases size of place: Ann Arbor: ISR Working Pa-
115 variables per Series, 1979.
SO-unit-Iong record
2 records per case

Shannon, Lyle W.

Rodgers, Willard L, Robert W. Marans, et al. Sanctions In the justice system,


1942-19n: The effects on offenders In
Quality of life In the Detroit Racine, Wisconsin
metropolitan area, 1975
(ICPSR S530)
(ICPSR 7986)
This study was sponsored by the United States
A sample of the residents of the Detroit metro- Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
politan area evaluated their urban environ- tice. The grellt number Is 84-IJ-CX-0013.
ment for this study of the quality of life. The
study was begun in October 1974 and was Summary: The purpose of this data collection
completed In February 1975. This study was was to evaluate the effectiveness of judicial In-
a part of an extensive research project the tervention and varying degrees of sanction se-
purpose of which was to produce theoretically verity by comparing persons who have been
Important and operationally useful research processed at the juvenile or adult level In the
on the urban environment. The specific pur- justice system with persons who have not.
pose of the Detroit area study was to develop The main research question was whether the
valid Indicators of the subjective quality of ur· number of judicial interventions and severity
ban life and to examine the residents' evalu- of sanctions had any effects on the serious-
ations of their environment. Respondents ness of offenders' future offenses or the deci-
answered questions about the public transpor- sion to desist from such behavior. Variables
tation system; the schools; recreational oppor- include characteristics of the person who had
tunities; public safety; and housing, nei~'hbor­ the police contact as well as items specific to
hood, and population characteristics. The a particular police contact. Others are the
respondents were either the head, or the number of police contacts, seriousness of po-
spouse of the head, of household and were lice contacts, severity of sanctions, and age,

Community studies 23
cohort, and decade the contact occurred. gated and merged to produce nelghborhood-
Class IV level data on disorder, crime, fear, residential
satisfaction, and other key factors In commu-
Universe: Persons In RacIne, WisconsIn born nity decline. The 40 neighborhoods studied
In 1942, 1949 and 1955. were located In Atlanta, Chicago, Houston,
Newark, Philadelphia, and San Francisco.
SampHng: The sample population included Variables in the data file Include: (1) disorder
6.127 persons from three birth cohorts (1942, characteristics such as loitering, drugs, van-
1949, and 1955). dalism, noise, and gang actiVity, (2) demo-
graphic characteristics such as race, age,
Note: The files are contact-by-contact data and unemployment rate, and (3) neighbor-
flies, that Is, the contact (not the person) Is hood crime problems such as burglary, rob-
the unit of analysis. Each contact becomes a bery, assault, and rape. Information is also
record. There can be multiple records (con- available on crime avoidance behavIors, fear
tacts) per Individual. Each Individual is identi- of crime on an aggregated scale, neighbor·
fied by the variable called UID (Unique Identi- hood satisfaction on an aggregated scale,
fication Number). and cohesion and social interaction. Class IV

Extent of collection: 2 data files Sampling: The 40 neighborhoods are a con-


venience sample based on the avallability of
Card Image data format surveys with similar variables of Interest.
Each of the five data collections from which
Part 1 the sample was drawn used different proce-
Interview and police contact dures for selecting respondents and different
rectangular file structure definitions of community. See detailed de-
15,245 cases scriptions In Lewis and Skogan (ICPSR
198 variables 8162), Greenberg (ICPSR 7951), Taub and
80-unlt-long record Taylor (ICPSR 7952), Pate and Annan
12 records per case (ICPSR 8496), and Sko~an's final report to
the National Institute of Justice. Full titles are
Part 2 listed in the note below.
Police Contact Data
rectangular file structure Note: Data in this collection were takan from
15,245 cases the following datasets: (1) Reactions to
96 variables crime project, 1977 {Chicago, Philadel·
80-unit-long record phia, San Francisco}: Survey on fear of
12 records per case crime and citizen behavior (lCPSR 8162),
(2) Characteristics of high and low crime
Related Publication: neighborhoods in Atlanta, 1980 (ICPSR
Shannon, Lyle 8951), (3) Crime factors and neighborhood
A more precise evaluation of the effects of decline in Chicago, 1979 (ICPSR 7952), (4)
sanctions (in press). Reducing fear of crime program evalu-
ation surveys in Newark and Houston,
1983·1984 (lCPSR 8496), and (5) a survey of
citizen participation in crime prevention in six
Chicago neighborhoods conducted by Rosen-
Skogan, Wesley G.
baum, Lewis, and Grans.
Disorder and community decline In 40
neighborhoods of the United States, Extent of collection: 1 data file + SPSS con-
trol cards
1977-1983
(lCPSR 8944) Card image data format with SPSS control
cards
This study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- rectangular file structure
tice. The grMt number is 83-IJ-CX-0074. 40 cases
68 variables
Summary: This data coUoction was designed 80-unit-long record
to evaluate the effects of disorderly neighbor- 12 records per case
hood conditions on community decline and
residents' reactions toward crime. Data from
five previously collected datasets were aggre-

24 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Related Publication: Taub, Richard and D. Garth Taylor
Skogan, Wesley
"Disorder and community decline: Final re- Crime factors and neighborhood
port to the National Institute of JUstice." decline In Chicago, 1979
Evanston, IL: Northwestern University,
Center for Urban Affairs and Policy (ICPSR 7952)
Research.
This study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Justice, National Inst~ute of Jus-
tice. The grant number is 7S-Ni-A)(-0079.
Spelman, William S~mmary: This study explores the relation-
ship between crime and neighborhood dete-
Reactions to crime In Atlanta and rioration in eight neighborhoods in Chicago.
Chicago, 1979-1980 The neighborhoods were selected on the ba-
(ICPSR 8215) sis of slowly or rapidly appreciating real es-
tate values, stable or changing racial composi-
ThIs study was sponsored by the United states tion, and high or low crime rates. The Survey
Depa1ment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- file contalns the results of a telephone survey
tice. The grant number Is 78-NI-AX-0107. administered to approximately 400 heads of
households in each study neighborhood; a to-
Summary: Two previously released data col- tal 01 3,310 completed interviews. The survey
lections from ICPSR are combined In this da- was designed to measure victimization experi-
taset. The first is Characteristics of high ence, fear and perceptions of crime, protec-
and low crime neighborhoods in Atlanta tive measures taken, attitudes toward neigh-
1980 (lGPSR 7951) by Stephanie Greenbe~g. borhood quality and resources, attitudes
Information was obtained from 523 residents toward the neighborhood as an investment
Interviewed In six selected neighborhoods In Md density of community Involvement. Re~
Atlanta, Georgia A research team from the spondents from each of the eight neighbor-
Research Triangle Institute sampled and sur- hoods were selected on the basis of random
veyed the residents. The second dataset is digit dialing and screened for street name and
Crime factors and neighborhood decline block number. Each record also Includes ap-
in Chicago, 1979 (lCPSR 7952) by Richard pearance ratings for the block of the respon-
Taub of the National Opinion Research Cen- dent's residence and aggregate figures on
ter. This collection contalns 3,310 interviews personal and property victimization for that
of Chicago residents in eight selected neigh- city block. The aggregate appearance ratings
borhoods. The Spelman data contain 156 were compiled from windshield surveys taken
variables including residents' demographics by trained personnel of the National Opinion
and socioeconomic status, personal crime Research Center. The criminal victimization
rates, property crime rates, neighborhood figures came from Chicago City Police files.
crime rates, and neighborhood charac- This file contains 411 variables on the 3,310
teristics. There are three pieces of information cases. Class 1\
for each variable: variable reference numbers
for both the Atlanta and Chicago datasets'
and the complete wording of the coding ,
schemes adopted by the researcher. The Thompson, James W.
combined dataset contalns 3 833 cases with
three logical records per cas~. The logical re- Relationships between employment
cord length of the files Is 133 charooters. and crime: A survey of Brooklyn
Class IV residents, 1979·1980
(ICPSR 8649)

This study was sponsored by the United states


Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus·
tice. The gran'( number is 81-IJ-CX-0024.

Summary: The study was designed to ex-


plore the relationship between labor market
participation and involvement with the crimi-
nal justice system. The data include informa-
tion on labor market participation, arrests, pe-

Community studies 25
riods of incarceration, and the respondents' and residing In Brooklyn during July and Au-
demographic characteristics. The labor mar- gust, 1979. A sub-sample of 152 respondents
ket Information, which was obtalned through was re-Intervlewed In 1980.
Interviews at the tima of the respondents' ar-
rests, spans a two-year period prior to those Extent of collection: 1 data file
arrests. Prior arrest history and other criminal
justice data cover the two years prior to arrest Card Image data format
and one year following the arrest. Additional
variables Include: employment and occupa- rectangular file structure
tional data, social and neighborhood charac- 902 cases
teristics, and information on perceptions of 541 variables
the risk of committing selected crimes. This 80-unlt·long record
study Is valuable because it examines the em- 19 records per case
pirical relationship between crime and em-
ployment at three points In time: two years Related Publications:
prior to arrest, at the time of arrest, and a Sullivan, M., and J.W. Thompson
year following arrest. Class IV ·Youth crime and employment patterns In
three Brooklyn neighborhoods." New York,
Universe: All males arrested for felony of- NY: Vera Institute of Justice, 1984.
fenses and residing In Brooklyn during July Svlrldoff, M., and J. McElroy
and August 1979. "Employment and crime: A summary re-
port." New York, NY: Vera Institute of Jus-
Sampling: The sample consists of 902 males tice, 1984.
arrested predominantly for felony offenses

26 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Corrections - adult

Bureau of Justice Statistics, Part 1


U.S. Department of Justice Combined file
rectangular file structure
Capital punishment In the United 3,842 cases
States, 1973·1987 36 variables
SS-unlt-/ong record
(ICPSR 9210) 1 record per case
Summary: This data collection provides an- Part 2
nual figures on prisoners under a sentence of Historical file
death and on prisoners whose sentences rectangular file structure
were commuted or vacated. The data furnish 1,743 cases
basic soclodemographic classifications Includ- 36 varIables
ing age, sex, race and ethnicity, marital status 65-unit-long record
at time of imprisonment, level of education, 1 record per case
and state and region of Incarceration. CrimI-
nal history information includes prior felony Part 3
convictions, prior convictions for crimInal Current file
homicide, and legal status at the time of the rectangular file structure
capital offense. Additional information is pro- 2,099 cases
vided on those inmates removed from death 36 variables
row by yearend 1986, inmates receiving a 65-unit-long record
second capital punishment sentence In 1987, 1 record per case
and inmates who were executed. Class"
Related Publications:
Universe: All persons In the United States un- Bureau of Justice StatIstics
der sentence of death between 1973 and "Correctional populations In the UnIted
1987. States, 1986." Washington, DC: U.S. Gov-
ernment Printing Office, February 1989.
Note: Information in this dataset collected Bureau of Justice Statistics
prior to 1972 Is In many cases Incomplete "CapItal punishment 1987." WashIngton,
and reflects vestiges in the reporting process. DC: U.S. Government PrintIng Office, July
The names of the inmates were removed 1988.
from the files for reasons of confidentiality. Us-
ers should note that the Combined file will
contain duplicate Identification numbers due
to changes In status of some inmates. These
Identification numbers were assigned by the Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Bureau of the Census and have no purpose U.S. Department of Justice
outside this dataset.
Capital punishment In the United
Extent of collection: 3 data files + machine- States, 1973·1988
readable documentation + SPSS control (ICPSR 9337)
cards
Summary: This data collection provides an-
LRECL and OSIRIS data formats, With SPSS nual data on prisoners under a sentence of
control cards death and on those whose offense sentences
were commuted or vacated. Information is
available on basic sociodemographic charac-
teristics such as age, sex, race and ethnicity,
marital status at time of imprisonment, level

Corrections - adult 27
of education, and state of Incarceration. Crimi- Bureau of Justice Statistics,
nal history data Include prior felony convic- U.S. Department of Justice
tions for criminal homicide and legal status at
the time of the capital offense. Additlonallnfor- Capital punishment In the United
matlon Is provided on those Inmates removed States, 1973·1989
from death row by yearend 1988 and those In-
mates who were executed. Class II (ICPSR 9507)

Universe: Inmates In state prisons throughout Summary: This data collection provides an-
the United States under the sentence of nual data on prisoners under a sentence of
death. death and on those whose offense sentences
were commuted or vacated during the period
Note: Information collected prior to 1972 Is In 1973-1989. Information Is supplied on basic
many cases Incomplete and reflects vestiges soclodemographlc characteristics such as
In the reporting process. Names of Inmates age, sex, race and ethnlclty, marital status at
have been removed from the files for reasons time of Imprisonment, level of education, and
of confidentiality. The Inmate Identification state of Incarceration. Criminal history data In-
numbers were assigned by the Bureau of clude prior felony convictions for criminal
Census and have no purpose outside this homicide and legal status at the time of the
data collection. capital offense. Additional Information Is ave:;·
able for those Inmates removed from death
Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine- row by yearend 1989 and for those Inmates
readable documentation + SPSS control who were executed. Class II
cards
Universe: All Inmates on death row since
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with 1972 In the United States.
SPSS control cards
Note: Information collected prior to 1972 Is In
Part 1 many cases incomplete and reflects vestiges
Current file In the reporting process. Names of Inmates
rectangular file structure have been removed from the files for reasons
2,263 cases of confidentiality. The Inmate Identification
36 variables numbers were assigned ;y the Bureau of the
64-unit-long r&cord Census and have no purpose outside this
1 record per case data collection.

Part 2 Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine-


Historical file readable documentation + SPSS control
rectangular file structure cards
1,893 cases
36 variables OSIRIS and LRECL data formats, with SPSS
64-unit-long record control cards
1 record per case
Part 1
Related Publications: Historical file
Bureau of Justice Statistics rectangular file structure
"Correctional populations In the United 2,057 cases
States, 1987." Washington, DC: U.S. Gov- 37 variables
ernment Printing Office, February 1990. 66-unit·long record
Bureau of Justice Statistics 1 record per case
"Capital punishment 1988." Washington,
DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, July Part 2
1989. Current file
rectangular file structure
2,368 cases
37 variables
66-unit-long record
1 record per case

28 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Related Publication: analyze the current conditions and needs of
Bureau of Justice Statistics state correctional facilities for adults. Vari-
"Capital punishment 1989." Washington, ables of Interest include physical security, age
DC: United States Department of Justice, of facilities, functions of facilities, programs, In-
Bureau of Justice Statistics, September mate work assignments. stalf employment, fa-
1990. cilities under court order/consent decree for
conditions of confinement, capital and operat-
Ing expenditures, custody level of residents!
Inmates, one-day and average daily popula-
tion counts, race/ethnlclty of inmates, Inmate
Bureau of Justice Statistics, work assignments, Inmate deaths, special In-
U.S. Department of Justice mate counts, and assaults and Incidents by In-
Census of state adult correctional mates. The Institution Is the unit of analysis.
Class Ii
facilities, 1979
(ICPSR 7852) Universe: All United States correctional facUi-
ties stalfed and administered by state employ-
this study was designed by the Bureau of ees, primarily for State prisoners. operational
Justice Statistics and conducted by the on June 30, 1984, and functionally distinct In
United States Bureau of the Census. The cen- a separate physical location under the admini-
sus Includes all state correctional facilities stration of their own warden, superintendent,
known to the Bureau of the Census In 1979. director, or other administrator.
Each facility Is classified Into one of ten cate-
gories such as community center, prison Note: Umltatlons on capital expenditures,
farm, road camp, or reception center. Data for race, ethnlclty and population movement exist
1979 Include: number of Inmates by security In the data and are documented thoroughly.
classification and sex; number of full and part.
time stalf; number of paid and volunteer stalf Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
broken dewn by position, age, pay and educa- readable documentation + SPSS control
tion; number and age of facilities; type of facili- cards
ties provided In each cell by size of cell; hospi-
tal facilities available; programs provided for OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with
the inmates: Job training and Inmate IQ SPSS control cards for each
scores. There are a total of 493 variables for
the 791 facilities in the 1979 census. The data rectangular file structure
are arranged with one record per facility. (An 903 cases
earlier census, In 1974, was released as part 759 variables
of ICPSR 7811). Class II 2,154-unit-Iong record
28 records per case
Related Publication:
Bureau of Justice Statistics
"Census of state correctionallacilities,
1979: AdVance report." NCJ-25642. Wash· Bureau of Justlce Statlstlcs,
Ington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Of· U.S. Department of Justice
fice, 1979.
Historical statistics on prisoners In
state and federal Institutions, yearend
1925·1986: [United States]
Bureau of JUstice Statistics, (ICPSR 8912)
U.S. Department of Justice
Census of state adult correctional Summary: This data collection supplies an-
facilities, 1984 nual data on the size of the prison population
and the size of the general population In the
(ICPSR 8444) United States for the period 1925 to 1986.
These yearend counts include tabulations for
Summary: This study contains a descriptive prisons in each of the 50 states and the Dis-
analysis of confinement facilities and state- trict of Columbia, as well as the ff.3deral pris-
operated community-based correctional facili- ons, and are intended to provide a measure
ties nationwide. Decision-makers, practitip- of the overall size of the prison population.
ners, and researchers may use the Census 10 The figures were derived from a voluntary re-

Corrections - adult 29
porting program In Which each state, the Dis- contalns all three of these record types. Parts 2
trict of Columbia, and the Federal Bureau of through 4 contaln the Individual record types.
Prisons reported summary statlstics as part of
the statistical Information on prison popula- Extent of collection: 4 data files + machine-
tions In the United States. Class" readable documentation + SPSS control cards
Note: This data collection preserves What OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with
was reported In the historical record. No at- SPSS control cards for each
tempts were made to correct any errors that
may have existed In the record. Part 1
Prison admissions and releases, parole
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- releases
readable documentation + SPSS control rectangular file structure
cards. 327,157 eases
95 variables
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with 233-unlt-long record
SPSS control cards for each 4 records per case
rectangular file structure Part 2
54 cases Prison admissions
126 variables rectangular file structure
923-unlt-long record 140,200 cases
14 records per case 95 variables
233-unlt-long record
Related Publications: 4 records per case
Bureau of Justice Statistics
"Historical statistics on prisoners In state Part 3
and federal Institutions, yearend 1925- Prison release
1986: Washington, DC: U.S. Government rectangular file structure
Printing Office, May 1988. 130,531 cases
Bureau of Justice Statistics 95 variables
"Historical Corrections Statistics In the 233-unlt-long record
United States, 1850-1984." Washington, 4 records per case
DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, De-
cember 1986. Part 4
Parole releases
rectangular file structure
56,426 cases
95 variables
Bureau of Justice Statistics, 233-unlt-long record
U.S. Department of Justice 4 records per case
National corrections reporting
program, 1983: [United states]
(lCPSR 8363) Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S, Department of Justice
Summary: This study was conducted to pro-
vide a cons:stent and comprehensive descrip- National corrections reporting
tion of convicted persons' entrances Into and program, 1984: [United states]
departures from correctional custody and cor-
rectional supervision. In order to accomplish (ICPSR 8497)
this goal, data were gathered on prison ad-
missions, prison releases, and paroie re- Summary: In 1983 the National Prisoners Sta-
leases. Class" tistics program on admissions and releases
(NPS) and the Uniform Parole Reports (UPR)
Universe: All sentenced persons who were were combined Into one reporting system, the
admitted to and/or released from a state National Corrections Reporting Program
prison system. (NCRP)_ The NCRP evolved from the need to
Improve and consolidate data on corrections
Note: This dataset Is available In four parts at the national leVel. Its objective Is to provide
containing racords on prison admissions, a consistent and comprehensive description
prison releases, and parole releases. Part 1 of prisoners entering and leaving the custody

30 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


0( supervision of state and federal authorltles. Bureau of Justice Statistics,
ThIrty-four states reported data In 1984, an In- U.S. Department of Justice
crease from the 30 that reported In 1983. In
addition to the states reporting, data from the National corrections reporting
Federal Prison System were added In 1984. program, 1985: [United states1
Data refer only to those prIsoners admitted to
prison, released from prison, 0( released from (ICPSR 8918)
parole In 1984. Class II
Summary: In 1983 the National Prisoners Sta-
Note: A machIne-readable codebook and tistics program on admIssion and release
SPSS control cards are available fO( Part 1. (NPS) and the Uniform Parole Reports (UPR)
Parts 2 through 4 are subsets of Part 1. were combined Into one reporting system, the
National Corrections Reporting Program
Extent of collection: 4 data flies + machine- (NCRP). The NCRP evolved from the need 10
readable documentation + SPSS control Improve and consolidate data on corrections
cards at the natIonal leVel. Its objective was to pro-
vIde a consIstent and comprehensive descrIp-
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with tion of prlscmers entering and leaving the cus-
SPSS control cards for each tody or supervIsion of state and federal
authorities. A total of 40 states reported In
Part 1 1985, an Increase from the 30 that reported In
Prison admissions and releases, parole 1983 and the 34 that reported In 1984. In ad-
reloases dition to the states reporting, the Federal
rectangular file structure PrIson System and the CalifornIa Youth
435,722 cases Authority also began reporting In 1984. Data
95 varIables refer only to those prisoners admitted to
233-unlt-long record prison, releaseo from prison, or released from
4 records per case parole In 1985. Variables Include Incarcera-
~on history, current offenses, and total time
Part 2 served. Background Information on Individu-
Prison admissions als Includes year of birth, sex, age, race, His-
rectangular file structure panIc origin, and educational attainment.
193,514 cases Class II
95 varIables
233-unlt-long record UnIverse: All people Incarcerated In state prIs-
4 records per case ons In 1985.

Part 3 Note: The records for Aonda data could not


Prison releases be verified as valid at time of release.
rectangular file structure
165,856 cases Extent of collection: 3 data files + machine-
95 variables readable documentation + SPSS control
233-unlt-long record cards
4 records per case
logical record length data format with SPSS
Part 4 control cards
Parole releases
rectangular file structure Part 1
86,352 cases Pri~oner admissions
95 variables rectangular file structure
233-unlt-long record 223,579 cases
4 records per case 103 variables
SSg-unlt-long record
1 record per case

Part 2
Prison releases
rectangular file structure
195,071 cases
103 variables
35g-unlt-long record
1 record per case

Corrections - adult 31
Part 3 that had been Identified In the National Jail
Parole releases Census, 1970, and were stili In existence In
rectangular file structure 1972. There are 3,580 records, one for each
96,637 cases jail. Data Include: number of Inmates held,
103 variables types of accommodations, number of dlfferElf1t
359-unlt-long record types of staff personnel, procedures for sEl!:ire-
1 record per case gating certain types of Inmates, selected facili-
ties, and programs and services. National JaJl
Censuses were also conducted In 1970
(ICPSR 7641) and In 1978 (ICPSR 7737).
Data and documentation were prepared by
Bureau of Justice Statistics, the Center for Advanced Computation, Univer-
U.S. Department of Justice sity of Illinois, Urbana. Class II
National Jail census, 1970
Related Publication:
(ICPSR 7641) "The nation's jails." Washington, D.C.:
U.S. Government Printing Office, Stock
The study was conducted for the National No. 02'1-000-00326-5.
Criminal Justice Informc:tlon and Statistics
Service by the Government's Division of the
United States Bureau of the Census. Coun-
ties and municipalities with a 1960 population Bureau of Justice Statistics,
of 1,000 or more were surveyed to determine
the presence of ajall. Data were collected for U.S. Department of Justice
jalls which were operated by the local jurisdic- National Jail census, 1978
tion and which confined Inmates for 48 hours
or more. There are data for 4,037 local jails. (ICPSR 7737)
Data Include jail population by reason being
held, age (juvenile or adult) and sex, maxi- The National jail census was conducted In
mum sentence that can be served in the fecll- early 1978 by the U.S. Bureau of the Census
ity, type of security available, facility capacity, for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The Cen-
age, construction and renovation of the facil- sus was taken of all locally administered
ity, employment, and operating expenditures. county and municipal jalls which had the
National Jail Censuses were also conducted authority to hold prisoners more than 48
In 1972 (ICPSR 7638) and in 1978 (ICPSR hours. Data are presented for 3,493 Jails In
7737). Data and documentation were pre- 45 states. Excluded are Connecticut, Dela-
pared by the Center for Advanced Computa- ware, HawaII, Rhode Island, and Vermont. In-
tion, University of illinois, Urbana. Class /I formation Includes Jail population by legal
status, age and sex of prisoners, maximum
Related Publication: sentence, admissions and releases, available
Bureau of Justice Statistics services, str~ture and capacity, expenditure,
"Local jails: A report presenting data for in- and employment. Class II
dividual county and city jails from the 1970
National Jail Census." Washington, D.C.:
U.S. Government Printing Office, Stock
No. 2700-00178.
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice
National Jail census, 1983
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
(ICPSR 8203)
U.S. Department of Justice
National jail census, 1972 The National Jail census was conducted by
the U.S. Census Bureau for the Bureau of
(ICPSR 7638) Justice Statistics. The Census was taken of
all locally administered county and municipal
Formerly: Survey of inmates of local j1.'ils: jails which had the authority to hold prisoners
institutional data, 1972. The survey was for more than 48 hours. Data are presented
conducted for the National Criminal Justice In- for 3,338 Jails in 45 states. Excluded are Con-
formation and Statistics Service by the Demo- necticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Rhode Island,
graphic Survey Division, United States Bu- and Vermont. Information includes Jail popula-
reau of the Census. The survey covers jails tion by legal status, age and sex of prisoners,

32 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


maximum sentence, admissions and re- rectangular file structure
leases, available services, structure and ca- 3,316 cases
pacity, expenditure, and employment. There 575 variables
are 452 variables. Class II 1,429-unit·long record
22 records per case

Bureau of Justice Statistics,


U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of JUstice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice
National Jail census, 1988
National survey of Jails: Jurisdiction-
(ICPSR 9256)
level and jall·leVf~1 data, 1985
Summary: National jall census, 1988 Is the (ICPSR 8687)
fifth In a series of data collection efforts aimed
at studying the nation's locally administered Summary: The Bureau of Justice Statistics
jails. For purposes of this data collection, a Jall (BJS) sponsors the Sample Survey of JaBs
was defined as a confinement facility In- as part of a series of statistical programs
tended for holding adults and In some cases measuring the correctional popUlation. A com-
juveniles pending adjudication or having sen- plete census of local jails Is conducted every
tences of a year or less. Jalls were further de- five years and In the intervening years this
fined as being administered and staffed by Sample Survey provides basic data about the
municipal or county employees. Also Included natlgnal jail population. The first Sample Sur-
In this collection are six Jalls that are now pri- vey was conducted In 1982 and was followed
vately operated under cDntract for local gov- by a complete census of jails In 1983. Sample
ernments. Variables Include information on Surveys have been conducted In 1984 and,
jail population by legal status, age, and sex of most recently, In 1985. The Omnibus Crime
pl'isoners, maximum sentence, admissions Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 as
and releases, avallable services, structure amended (42 U.S.C. 3732) • .'.UJthorized the
and capacity, expenditure, and employment. collection of this information. The Sample SUr-
Class II vey meets BJS's need to analyze continu-
ously the "spillover" effect on local jails of the
Universe: All locally administered jails in the growth In federal and state prison popula-
United States. tions. The data. are used in conjunction with
statistics on federal and state prisoners to pro-
Note: The mailing list used for the census vide a complete picture of the adult correc-
was derived from the American Correctional tional system and to measure changes In that
Association Directory of Justice Agencies, system. Class IV
publications such as American jails, tele-
phone calls to large metropolitan jall systems Universe: All jails In the United States.
(e,g., New York City), state jail Inspection bu-
reaus, and newspaper articles. Following the Sampling: Asimple random sample of jurisdic-
initial mallout to 3,448 facilities, 44 Jails were tions stratified by average daily population as
added and 176 deleted according to the crite- reported In the 1983 National Jail Census.
ria for inclusion, leaving a total of 3,316 facili-
ties In 44 states. Excluded from the census Extent of collection: 2 data files
were federal or state administered facilities in-
cluding the combined jall-person systems In Logical record length data format
Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, HawaII,
Rhode Island, and Vermont. Part 1
Jail-level
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- rectangular file structure
readable documentation + SPSS control 1,142 cases
cards 170 variables
1,820-unit-long record
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with 1 record per case
SPSS control cards for each

Corrections· adult 33
Part 2 Part 2
Jurisdiction-level Jurisdiction-level data
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
874 cases 868 cases
170 variables 174 variables
1,820-unlt-long record 695-unit-long record
1 record per case 11 records per case

Bureau of Justice Statistics, Bureau of Justice Statistics,


U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Justice
National survey of jails: Jurisdiction- National survey of Jails: Jurisdiction-
level and jail-level data, 1986 level data, 1987
(lCPSR 8871) (ICPSR 9074)

Summary: This data collection provides an- Summary: This data collection provides an-
nual data on Jail populations across the nation nual data on Jail populations across the nation
and examines the ·spillover" effect on local and examines the ·spillover" effect on local
Jails resulting from the dramatic growth In Fed- Jails resulting from the dramatic growth in fed-
eral and state prison populations. These data eral and state prison populaticns. These data
permit an assessment of the demands placed permit an assessment of the demands placed
on correctional resources. Information Is avail- on correctional resources and provide a com-
able on the number of Inmates by sex, race, piete picture of the adult correctional system
adult or Juvenile status, reason being held, and the changes that occur In that system. In-
and cause of death. Class II formation is available on the number of in-
mates by sex, race, adult or juvenile status, rea-
Universe: All city and county Jails in the son being held, c:nd cause of death. Class II
United States.
Sampling: A stratified simple random sample
Sampling: A stratified simple random sample of jurisdictions stratified by the average daily
of jurisdictions stratified by the average daily population (ADP) as reported by the National
population (ADP) as reported by the National Jail Census, 1983.
Jail Census, 1983.
Note: The Census Bureau used a nine-digit
Note: The Census Bureau used a 9-digit Gov- Government Identification number In order to
ernment Identification number in order 10 uni- Identify each jail uniquely. Due to restrictions
quely identify each Jail. Due to restrictions in in OSIRIS, this variable has been broken up
OSiRIS, this variable has been broken up into Into four different variables. Users of the data
four different variables. Users of the data will will have to combine these four variables in or-
have 10 combine these four variables in order der to identify a particular Jail.
to identify a particular jail.
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine- readable documentation + SPSS control
readable documentation + SPSS control cards
cards
OSIRIS and card image data formats, with
OSIRIS and card image data formats, with SPSS control cards for each
SPSS control cards for each
rectangular file structure
Part 1 866 cases
Jail-level data 176 variables
rectangular file structure 1,660-unit-long record
1,137 cases 21 records per case
176 variables
740-unit-long record
12 records per case

34 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. rnatas are supplied on recidivism among pris-
Department of Justice oners of all ages with all types of postrelease
supervision. Data cover recidivism both within
National survey of Jails: Jurisdiction- and outside the states in which the prisoners
level data, 1989 were released. Variables include sociodemo-
graphic indices, type of sentence, length of
(ICPSR 9373) sentence, offense, court action, and date of
court action. Class II
Summary: This data collection provides an-
nual data on jail populations across the nation Universe: Prisoners released from prison In
and examines the "spillover" effect on local 1983 from the following states: California,
Jails resultirig from the dramatic growth In fed- Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, New
eral and state prison populations. These data Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Ore·
permit an assessment of the demands placed gon, and Texas.
on correctional resources and provide a com-
plete picture of the adult correctional system Sampling: Systematic stratified sample.
and the changes that occur in that system. In-
formation is available on the number of in- Note: This data set has five levels. Level 1
mates by sex, race, adult or Juvenile status, contains 66 varIables and one record per
reason being held, and cause of death. case for each of 16,355 Identification seg-
Class II ments. Level 2 contains 154 variables and
one record per case for each of 126,620 ar-
Sampling: A stratified simple random sample rests. Leval 3 contains 119 variables and one
of Jurisdictions stratified by the average dally record per case for each of 84,741 judicial
population (ADP) as reported by the 1988 contacts. Level 4 contains 144 variables and
Census of Local Jails with allocation to the one record par case for each of 35,337 cus-
strata based on 1983 ADP. tody segments. Level 5 contains 139 vari-
ables and one record per case for 36,846
Note: The Census Bureau used a nine-digit event segments. The data contain blanks and
Government Identification number in order to alphabetic characters.
identify each jail uniquely. Due to restrictions
In OSIRIS, this variable has been broken up Extent of collection: 1 data file
into four different variables. Users of the data
will have to combine these four variables in or- logical record length data format
der to identify a particular Jail.
hierarchical file structure
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- 536-unlt-long record
readable documentation + SPSS Control
Cards Related Publication:
Beck, Allen J.
OSIRIS and card image data formats, with "Bureau of justice statistics special report,
SPSS control cards for each recidivism of prisoners released in 1983."
Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statis-
rectangular file structure tics, March 1989.
809 cases
188 variables
964-unit-long record
15 records per case
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice
Recidivism among young parolees: A
Bureau of Justice Statistics, study of Inmates released from prison
U.S. Department of JustIce in 22 states, 1978
Recidivism among released prisoners, (ICPSR 8673)
1983: [United States]
Summary: This study examines the criminal
(ICPSR 8875) activities of a group of young offenders after
their release from prison to parole supervi-
Summary: This data collection provides com- sion. Previous studies have examined recidi-
prehensive criminal history data on prisoners vism using arrests as the principal measure,
released from custody in 1983. Precise estl·

Corrections - adult 35
whereas this study examines a variety of fac- Bureau of Justice Statistics,
tors, Including length of Incarceration, age, U.S. Department of Justice
sex, race, prior arrest record, prosecutions,
length of time between parole and rearrest, Survey of Inmates of local jails, 1983:
parolees not prosecuted for new offenses but [United States]
having their parole revoked, rearrests in
states other than the paroling states, and the (ICPSR 8274)
nature and location of rearrest charges. Parol-
ees In the 22 states covered In this study, ac- Data for the Survey of Inmates of Local Jails,
count for 50 percent of all state prisoners pa- 1983 were collected by the Bureau of the
roled In the United States In 1978. Class II Census for the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
The 5,785 respondents were selected from a
Universe: Population of offenders aged 18 to universe of 3,600 Institutions housing
22, released from prison to parole supervision. 190,000 male and 13,000 female Inmates.
The sample Included 400 Institutions, 4,300
Sampling: Random selection, or stratified male and 1,800 female Inmates. The survey
sampling, or all persons paroled, depending consists of Information regarding socioeco-
on the state, selected to ensure maximum nomic characteristics and demographics of re-
coverage. spondents; previous military service; prior
criminal hlstory;jall activities; drug and alco-
Note: This data collection Is hierarchically hol use; health care; and current offenses.
structured with two levels. The first level con- There are 1,040 variables In the dataset,
tains Uniform Parole Report data and has a which has a logical record length of 1,850
logical record length of 354, 49 variables, and characters. Class II
4,002 records. The second level contains re-
cord of arrest and prosecution and has a logi-
cal record length of 354, 169 variables, and
22,192 records. Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Restrictions: For certain variables, the data U.S. Department of Justice
have been masked In order to maintain the Survey of Inmates of state correctional
confidentiality of respondents participating in facilities, 1979
social science research.
(ICPSR 7856)
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machlne-
readable documentation Designed by the Bureau of Justice Statistics
and conducted by the Bureau of the Census,
OSIRIS data format this survey was one of a series of data-gather-
ing efforts undertaken during the 1970's to as-
hierarchical file structure sist policymakers in assessing the nation's
354·unit-long record correctional Institutions and in formulating
measures to overcome any deficiencies. Un-
Related Publications: der the terms of the Crime Control Act of
illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority 1976, the Law Enforcement Assistance Ad-
"The pace of recidivism in Illinois." Re- ministration (LEAA) was authorized by Con-
search Bulletin (Number 2, April 1986) . gress to survey existing and future needs in
Klein, S. and M. Caggiano federal, state, and local correctional facilities.
"The prevalence, predictability, and policy The Survey of Inmates of State Correctional
Irnplications of recidivism.· Santa Monica, Facilities gathered extensive information on
CA: Rand Corporation, 1986. demographic, socioeconomic, and criminal
Delaware Statistical Analysis Center history characteristics. Also obtained were de-
"Recidivism in Delaware - A study of rear- tails of inmates' military service records such
rest after release from incarceration.· De- as time of service and branch of service, eligi-
cember, 1984. bility for benefits, type of discharge, and con-
tact with veterans' groups. Other variables In-
clude age, ethnicity, education, life-time drug
use, drinking pattern prior to arrest, prior Incar-
ceration record, and prearrest annual/ncome.
All information was provided by Inmates who
participated in personal Interviews on a volun-
tary basis. The data comprised of 993 vari-
ables are in a single file with 11,397 records

36 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


and a logical record length of 1,959 charac- 7852 and 7856) and previously In 1974
ters per record. (An earlier survli¥, in 1974, (ICPSR 7811).
was released as part of ICPSR 7811). Class I
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machIne-
readable documentation + SPSS control
cards
Bureau of Justice Statistics, OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with
U.S. Department of Justlce SPSS control cards for each
Survey of inmates of state correctional
rectangular file structure
facilities. 1986: [United States} 11,397 cases
(lCPSR 8711) 1,136 varlabl es
1,642-unit-long record
Summary: The purpose of this survey was to 31 records per case
obtaln Information on the characteristics of
persons confined to state prisons, their cur- Related Publications:
rent and past offenses, and the circum- Bureau of Justice Statistics
stances or conditions of their confinement. ·Profile of state prison inmates, 1986."
This information, which Is not available on a BJS Special Report, NCJ-109926, Janu-
national basis from any other source, is In- ary 1988.
tended to assist the criminal justice commu- Bureau of Justice Statistics
nity and other researchers In analysis and "1984 census of state adult correctional fa-
evaluation of correctiollSi Issues. The collec- cilities." BJS Report, NCJ-105585, August
tion focuses on topics and Issues of current 1987.
concern in research and policy within the field Bureau of Justice Statistics
of corrections. Chief among these are the ·Prisoners in 1984." BJS Bulletin, NCJ-
characteristics of the inmate population, crimi- 97118, April 1985.
nal histories of inmates, and Inmate back-
grounds. Also included Is extensive Informa-
tion on Inmates' drug and alcohol use,
program participation, and the victims of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S.
inmates' most recent offenses. Class II Department of Justice
Universe: All adult inmates in the United Survey of Inmates of state correctional
States housed in correctional facilities oper- facilities and census of state adult
ated by a state government. correctional facilities, 1974
Sampling: The sample design employed was (ICPSR 7811)
a stratified two·stage selection with the prob.
abilities proportional to the size of the correc- Summary: The survey and census were part
tional facility. The sample was selected inde- of a series of data collection efforts under-
pendently from two frames, one for males taken to assist policymakers in assessing and
only and a second that allowed an oversam- remedying deficiencies in the nation'S correc-
pie of females. Within each frame, facilities tional institutions. The survey was designed
were stratified by type (prison versus commu- to provide information on social and eco·
nity corrections facility) and by census region. nomic characteristics of inmates. criminal and
In the second stage, interviewers visited each correctional backgrounds, court experiences,
selected facility and drew a sample of In- and prison routines. The census gathered a
mates using predetermined sampling proce- wide range of information on all federal COf-
dures.ln 1986, 275 facilities were selected, rectional facilities operating in 1974. The fo-
yielding a sample of about 15,000. A total of cus of the survey file is on the inmate, while
13,71 1 inmates were successfully Interviewed. the focus of the census file is on the facility.
Class II
Note: A companion data collection, Census
of state adult correctional facilities, 1984 Universe: The survey sample totaled 10,000
(ICPSR 8444), collected detailed information inmates or approximately 1 in every 18 offend-
on each of the 903 prisons and community ers under the jurisdiction of state correctional
corrections facilities in operation in 1984 and authorities. The data collection includes 9,040
provided the basis for sampling procedures of these interviews. The census enumerated
used in this 1986 survej. A similar census all 592 state correctional facUities.
and survey were conducted in 1979 (ICPSR

Corrections - adult 37
Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine- Related Publication:
readable documentation National Criminal Justice Information and Sta·
tlstics Service
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with ·Survey of local Jails, Advance report. Na-
SPSS control cards for each tional prisoner statistics special report."

Part 1
Survey of Inmates of state correctional
facilities, 1974
rectangular file structure Bureau of Justice Statistics,
9,040 cases U.S. Department of Justice
432 variables SU/vey of jail Inmates, 1978
746-unlt-long record
11 records per case (ICPSR 7751)

Part 2 In February of 1978, locally operated jalls


Census of state adult correctional were surveyed on a national seale. Of the
facilities, 1974 more than 158,000 persons who were esti-
rectangular fila structure mated to be held In these jails at that time, a
592 cases sample of 5,247 Inmates was drawn. Informa-
388 variables tion was gathered regarding type of facility,
746-unlt-long record availability of health care in the facility, per-
11 records per case sonal and educational backgrounds, reasons
for incarceration, sentencing, numbers of of-
fenses and inmate drug use. There are 579
variables for 5,247 cases. The data were col-
Bureau of Justice Statistics, lected by the U.S. Bureau of the Census for
the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). A Sur-
U.S. Department of Justice vey of Jail Inmates was also conducted in
Survey of jail Inmates, 1972 1972 (ICPSR 7668). Class"
(ICPSR 7668)

Summary: Formerly Survey of local jails: In·


mate data, 1972, this survey was conducted Bureau of Justice Statistics,
for the National Criminal Justice Information U.S. Department of Justice and
and Statistics Service by the Demographic Inter-university Consortium for Political and
Survey Division, United States Bureau of the Social Research
Census. The data were obtained In personal
interviews from a sample of the inmates of 10- Race of prisoners admitted to state
eal jails. There is information about 4,238 in- and federal Institutions In the United
mates, including: basic demographic data, in- States, 1926·1986
come and employment data, reasons for
incarceration, bail status, dates of admission (ICPSR 9165)
and sentencing, length and type of sentence,
and previous incarceration history. A survey of Summary: This data collection Includes tabu-
Jail Inmates was also conducted in 1978 lations of annual adult admissions to federal
(ICPSR 7751). Data and documentation were and state correctional institutions by race.
prepared by the Center for Advanced Compu- Data are provided tor the years 1926 to 1986
tation, University of Illinois, Urbana. Class II and include tabulations for prisons in each of
the 50 states and the District of Columbia, as
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- well as federal prison totals and United States
readable documentation totals. The figures were derived from a volun-
tary reporting program in which each state,
OSIRIS and card image data formats the District of Columbia, and the Federal Bu-
reau of Prisons reported summary and de-
rectangular data format tailed statistics as a part of the National Pris-
4,238 cases oner Statistics series. Individual state and
116 variables United States population figures according to
218-unit-long record racial categories also are provided. Class"
3 records per case

38 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Note: The 54 cases In this collection repre- dUty survey contalns 208 variables for 405
sent the 50 United States and the District of cases. Class"
Columbia plus three additional categories,
"United States totals,· "federal totals," and
"state totals." The "United States totals" are
the sum of the federal and state categories.
Apao, William K.
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machlne- Improving prison classification
readable documentation + SPSS Control procedures In Vermont: Applying an
Cards
Interaction model, 1983·1985
OSIRIS and card Image data format, with (ICPSR 8933)
SPSS control cards for each
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
rectangular file structure Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
54 cases tice. The grant number Is 84-IJ-CX-00227.
350 variables
3,276 unit-long record Summary: The purpose of this data collection
47 records per case was to develop and test an Interactive model
for classifying prisoners. The model includes
Related Publication: person variables, environmental or situation
Langan, Patrick variables, and prison-environmentalinterac-
"Historical prisoner statistics on the race of tion variables In order to study the Interac-
persons admitted to state and fedoral insti- tions between Individuals and their environ-
tutions, 1926-1986." Washington, DC: ments and to predict offender behaviors such
U,S. Dept. of Justice. Bureau of Justice as Elscape, misconduct, and violence. The
Statistics, 1991. model was designed to enhance the predic-
tive validity of the National Institute of Correc-
tions' classification system that was being
used In Vermont prisons. Included are scores
Abt Associates, Inc. from the National Institute of Corrections' cus-
tody classification and reclassification Instru-
SUlVey of American prisons and Jails, ments, scores from a needs assessment, sen-
1979 tencing Information, and characteristics of the
prison In which the Inmate was housed.
(ICPSR 7899) Class IV
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States Universe: Inmates of state correctional facili-
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- ties In Vermont.
lice. The grant number is 77 -NI-AX-C018.
Sampling: The sample consists of 92 inmates
Summary: The Survey of American Prisons incarcerated In Vermont state correctional fa-
and Jails, 1979 was conducted by Abt Associ- cilities who had at least 30 days to serve In
ates of Cambrid~e, Massachusetts. The data the sentences. Median age of the sample
collection consists of two parts, a survey of was 25 years with a range of 15 to 69 years.
state and federal adult correctional systems Males constituted 97.5 percent of the sample
and a survey of community-based pre-re- and had a median-minimum sentence of one
lease facilities. These surveys attempted to year and a median-maximum of three years.
more precisely assess institutional conditions
in state and federal prisons and halfway Extent of collection: 1 data file
houses. Questionnaires were rr.al/ed to 558
federal and state prisons and 405 community Logical record length data format
based pre-release facilities. The response
rate was 100 percent. The variables Include rectangular llIe structure
inmate counts by sex and security class; age 982 cases
of facility and rated capacity; spatial density; 617 variables
composition of inmate population according 1,923-unit-long record
to race, age and offense type; inmate labor 1 record per case
and earnings; and race, age and sex charac-
teristics of prison staff. The federal state
prison survey contains 291 variables for 558
cases. The community based pre-release fa-

Corrections - adult 39
Austin, James Note: Names of Inmates were blanked for rea-
sons of confidentiality. The unit of observation
Prison crowding and forced releases for Part I, the Inmate Jacket File, Is the Indlvid-
In illinois, 1979·1982 uallnmate, while the unit of observation for
the Arrest Rap Sheet file Is the arrest.
(ICPSR 8921)
Extent of collection: 2 data flies
This study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- logical record length data format
tice. The gra1t number Is 83-IJ-CX-K026.
Part 1
Summary: These data were collected In the Inmate jacket
illinois prison system where, In response to a rectangular file structure
prison overcrowding crisis, approximately two- 1,557 cases
thirds of the Inmates released by the illinois 94 variables
Department of Corrections (IDOC) were dis- 310-unlt-long reocrd
charged prior to serving their expected sen- 1 record per case
tences. This study was designed to evaluate
the eifoots of an early release program on Part 2
prisoners, prison populations, offense rates, Arrest rap sheet
local criminal just!ce systems, and the gen- rectangular file structure
eral public. The files oontaln extensive Fed- 17,361 cases
eral Bureau of Inve~tigation arrest history In- 22 variables
formation and oth~r personal and social 70-unlt-long record
Indicators describ~ng Inmates released from 1 record per case
the state prison system. Data are available
for three comparison groups: (1) a sample of Related Publication:
prisoners who served their regular sentences AUstin, James, Barry Krlsberg, and Paul
prior to the "forced release" program, (2) a Kitsky
group that served regular sentences after im- "Using early release to relieve prison
plementation of the program, and (3) a group crowding: A dilemma In public policy."
of Inmates who were released early under the CrIme and Delinquency 32 (1984), 405-
program (i.e., before serving their full sen- 502.
tences). The "Inmate jacket file," which Is the
comprehensive Institutional file malntalned for
all Inmates, contalns variables for each In-
mate on social and personal characteristics,
criminal conduct, prior release and return re- Austin, James and Barry Krisberg
cords, method of release, condition of supervi-
sion, and parole violation records. The arrest Differential use of Jail confinement In
file Includes variables which describe the type San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Yolo
and number of charges at arrest, case dispo- counties, 1981
sition of each charge, probation length, Incar-
ceration length, admission and release dates, (ICPSR 8920)
and release type. Class IV
This study was sponsored by the United States
Universe: Inmates released from Illinois pris- Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
ons between July 1979 and December 1982. tice. The grant number Is 81-IJ-CX-0008.

Sampling: A total of 1,600 Inmates was ran- Summary: This study provides detailed infor-
domly selected from the IDOC automatic in- mation on inmate characteristics, length of
formation system's records of Inmates re- time in jail, methods of release, conditions of
leased between July 1979 and December release, disciplinary violations, and types of
1982. Of these, Inmate jackets were located program participation while In Jail. The file con-
for 1,557 cases and arrest history information tains variables for each Inmate, including in-
was available for 1,430 of the cases. Of the formation about inmates' demographic char-
1,557 Inmates included in the study, 355 were acteristics, current offenses, prior records
released prior to June 1, 1980. The remaining confinement conditions, disciplinary prob.'
1,202 inmates were released during the op- lems, and nature and time of disposition.
eration of the program. Not all of these were Class IV
early releases. Some Inmates served their
normal expected sentences. Universe: Sentenced and unsentenced In-
mates of jails in three California counties:

40 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Yolo, a rep- AUstin, James and Barry Krisberg
resentative county.
Supervised pretrial release programs,
Sampling: Sampling procedures vary by 1979·1982: Miami, Milwaukee, and
group and location: (1) Unsentenced In- Portland
mates-A systematic sample drawn at the
point of booking at jail. Sampling fractions (ICPSR 8919)
vary by jurisdiction. (2) Unsentenced Inmates
held more than 72 hours-Systematlc sam- This study was sponsored by the United States
ples With sampling fractions that vary by Juris- Department of Justice, Nallona Institute of Jus·
diction were drawn at the point of booking. tice. The grarlt number Is ao·IJ·CX·K014.
Those who had not been taken In the first
sample and who met the 72·hour criterion Summary: This data collection effort was de·
were taken. (3) Sentenced sample-Inmates signed to assess the effects of different types
In the sentenced group were sampled at the of supervised pretrial release (SPR). Four mao
time of release from Jail. Sampling fractions jor types of effects were examined: (1) defen-
vary by Jurisdictions. A total of 700 Inmates dants' behaviors 'Imlle awaiting trial (failure to
was selected at each site over a 12·month pe· appear and arrests for new offenses), (2) the
riod. Each sampled group contained between costs of SPR to victims and the criminal jus.
200 and 300 Inmates. tice system, (3) pretrial release practices, and
(4) Jail populations. This study provides de·
Note: A table In the codebook provides gen- tailed Information for a selected group of de-
erallnformatlon for each site: popuhtlon char· fendants awaiting trial on criminal histories
acterlstlcs, Jail characteristics, crime and ar- and arrests while awaiting trial. Data are also
rest rates, type of residency, average dally Jail available on services provided between arrest
population, annual Jail admissions, proportion and disposition. The study produced four dif·
pretrial, Federal Bureau of Investigation In· ferent databases. The first, Supervised Re·
dexed crime rates, and felony arrest rates. lease Information System (SRIS), contains In·
take Information on current arrest, criminal
Extent of collection: 1 data file reccrd, socioeconomic status, ties With the
community, contact With mental health and
Card Image data format substance abuse facilities, and pretrial reo
lease decisions. The release section of this
rectangular file structure data base contains information on program,
2,103 cases personal characteristics at termination, crimi·
95 variables nal charges at disposition, and new charges
80·unlt·long record resulting from arrests while under pretrial
3 records per case status. The Arrest Data Base includes vari-
ables on type and number of crimes commit·
Related Publications: ted by SPR defendants, property casts to vic·
Austin, James and Barry Krisberg tims, personal Injury costs, and court
"Differential use of jail confinement In Call· disposition for each offense. The Retrospec·
fornia: Executwe summary." San Fran· tIve Data Base supplies variables on charges
cisco, CA: National Council on Crime and filed and method of release, personal charac·
Delinquincy, 1984. teristlcs, length of pretrial incarceration, ball,
Austin, James and Barry Krlsberg whether the defendant was rebooked during
"Differential use of Jail confinement In Cali. the pretrial period, charge at disposition, sen·
fornia: Final report." San Francisco, CA: tence, total court appearances, and total fall·
National Council on Crime and Delln· ures to appear In court (FTAs). The Jail Popu·
quency, 1984. lation Data Base contains monthly counts of
jail popUlation and average da.i\y population.
Class IV

Universe: Felony defendants eligible for pre·


trial release or supervised release in Dade
County (Miami) Florida, Milwaukee County
(Milwaukee) Wisconsin, and Multnomah
County (Portland) Oregon.
Sampling: (1) Supervised Release Informa·
tion System (SRIS): 3,232 felony defendants
were selected from the three sites between

Corrections - adult 41
19S0 and 1982, Including those defendants Part 5
who were unable to gain pretrial release due Merged intake and release
to seriousness of their prior records, but were rectan:.iular file structure
judged by the court to be suitable for release 1,672 C'3.ses
with supervision. Of these, 1,692 cases en- 141 variables
tered the experimental program. (2) Arrest SO-unlt-Iong record
Data Base: A sample of 245 arrests Involving 15 records per case
205 SPR defendants during the experimental
period was drawn. (3) Retrospective Data Part 6
Base: A random sample of approximately 400 Arrest data
felony defendants drawn from booking logs in rectangular file structure
each site for 19S0 and again for 19S1 was se- 245 cases
lected. The 1980 sample was drawn from a 115 varlabl es
list of 1,25S defenclants In the 12-month pe- SO.unit·long record
riod prior to the project start-up. The 1981 11 records per case
sample was selected from 1,040 defendants
in the 12-month period the SPR program was Parts 7 and S
in operation. This sample provides baseline Retrospective data and duplicated
data that can be compared with the SRIS da- retrospective data
tabase. (4) Jail Population Data Base: This rectangular file structure
sample consists of monthly observation for 2,415 and 2S cases
periods of time that vary by site. For Miami 52 variables
the dates were January 1979 to October SO·unlt·long record
1981, for Milwaukee, December 1979 to Au- 5 records per case
gust 1981, and for Portland, January 19S0 to
November 1981. Part 9
Miami jail data
Note: The unit of observation for the Super- rectangular file structure
vised Release Information (SRIS) and the 34 cases
Retrospective Data Base Is the defendant. 9 variables
The unit of observation for the Arrest Data SO·unlt·long record
Base Is the arrest, and the unit of observation 1 record per case
for the Jail Population Data Base Is the
month. Not all of the flies provided by the prin- Part 10
cipal Investigators are completely docu- Milwaukee jail data
mented. Also, the number of records for rectangular file structure
some files Is greater than the number ex- 20 cases
pected for unkown reasons. For three of the 4 variables
files, a separate file Is provided with duplicate SO-unit·long record
records only. 1 record per case

Extent of collection: 11 data files Part 11


Portland jail data
Card Image data format rectangular file structure
23 cases
Parts 1 and 2 2 variables
Master intake and duplicated intake SO·unlt-long record
rectangular file structure 1 record per case
3,232 and S cases
59 variables Related Publications:
SO-unit-Iong record Austin, James, Barry Krlsberg, and Paul Utsky
6 records per case "Evaluation of the field test of supervised
pretrial release: Final report." San Fran-
Parts 3 and 4 cisco, CA: National Council on Crime and
Master release and duplicated release Delinquency, 1984.
rectangular file structure Austin, James, Barry Krisberg, and Paul Utsky
1,699 and 2 cases "Supervised pretrial release test design
S5 variables evaluation: Executive summary: San
SO-unit-Iong record Francisco, CA: National Council on Crime
9 records per case and Delinquency, 19S4.

42 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Austin, James, and Paul Utsky prior criminal record. Included [n this collec-
"Evaluation of pretrial supervised release tion are the criminal records of Individuals
program: Final evaluation design report.· aged 1Q years or older who were arrested In
San Francisco, CA: National Council on the state of New York from 1972 to 1986. Two
Crime and Delinquency, 1984. separate data files are supplied. Part 1 con-
tains data on all adults arrested In New York
from 1972 to 1976 for rape, murder, robbery,
aggravated assault, or burgIat;'. Part 21n-
cludes data on all Individuals arrested for lar-
Beli, Raymond, at al. ceny or auto theft In Albany and Erie coun-
Learning defIciencies among adult ties. Variables Include Items such as sex,
Inmates l 1982: LoUisiana, race, age, number of prior arrests, date and
place of arrest, arrest charged, number of
Pennsylvania, and Washington mUltiple counts, court disposition of charges,
(ICPSR 8359) and type and length of sentence. Class IV

ThIs study was sponsored by the United States Universe: Adults, aged 16 or older, arrested In
Depf;lrtment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- the general aleas of New York state for the of-
tice. The grmt number Is 81-IJ-CX·0014. fenses of murder, rape, robbery, aggravated
assault, or burglary and for larceny or auto
Summary: The National Institute of Justice theft In Albany or Erie counties.
sponsored this study of 1,065 prison Inmates
In louisIana, PennsylvanIa, and WashIngton. Note: The data are organized hierarchically In
Respondents were adminIstered an aca- two levels: (1) a person record, and (2) one or
demic achievement test and an indlvldualln- more arrest records. Each of the two data
telllgence test. Two screening tests were also files has a variable number of records per
given to certain respondents. Testing was case. The number of records Is dependent on
completed between January 1982 and Janu- the number of arrests an offender had. There
ary 1983. Specifically, the following seven are 14 variables and 129,010 cases at the
:Jroups of variables were examined: 1, Demo- person level, and 16 variables and 12,555
graphic variables: age, sex, race, employ- cases at the arrest level.
ment history, physical condition. 2. Criminal
Justice variables: offenses committed, prior in- Extent of collection: 2 data files
stitutionalization, juvenile adjudication. 3. Edu-
cational background variables: years of for- Logical record length data format
mal education, academic and vocational
participation while Incarcerated, previous diag- Part 1
noses, and prior tlilst results. 4. Family back- Arrests for serious crimes
ground variables: childhood home situation, hierarchical file structure
death of parents, number of siblings, child-
hood problems. 5. Academic achievement Part 2
variables: as measured by the Tests of Basic Arrests for larceny or auto theft
Education. 6. Ability variables: as measured hierarchical file structure
by the Wechsler Adult [ntelllgence Scale-Re-
vised. 7. Disability variables: as measured by
the Mann-Suiter Disabilities Screening Test.
The data are contained in one file that has a Bradshaw, Richard Anred
logical record length of 100 characters. Class IV
Cross-validation of the Iowa offender
risk assessment model In Michigan,
1980-1982
Blumstein, A~red and Jacqueline Cohen (lCPSR 9236)
Adult criminal careers In New York,
1972-1\983 ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Justice, Nationallnstnute of Jus-
(ICPSR 9353) tice. The grant number is 85-IJ·CX-0Q35.

Summary: This data collection was designed Summary: These data were collected in an at-
to estimate the extent and variation of crimi- tempt to cross-validate the 1984 and 1985
nal offenses by crime type, race, age, and versions of the Iowa model for assessing risk
of offending while on parole by applying the

Corrections - adult 43
model to a Michigan sample of male parolees Goodstein, Lynne, John H. Kramer, John
over a follow·up period of two and one·haIf R. Hepburn, and Doris L MacKenzie
years. Different measures of predictors such
as prior criminal history, current offense, sub· Effects of determinant sentencing on
stance abuse history, age, and recidivism on Institutional climate and prison
parole are available. The first file contains In· administration: Connecticut,
formation on parolees such as demographic Minnesota, ""nols, 1981·1983
characteristics, drug use history, prior criminal
history, risk scores, and parole history. The (ICPSR 8278)
second file Includes parolees' detailed crimi·
naI histories Including the total number of vlo· This study was sponsored by the United States
lent and nonviolent felony arrests and dates, Department of Justice, NatIonal Instnute of Jus-
and charges and dispositions of each arrest tice. The grant number Is SO·NI-AX-COO6.
with a maximum of eight arrests. Class IV
Summary: The effects of determinant sen-
Universe: Male parolees In tho state of Michl· tencing on prison climate and administratIon
gan In 1980. are examined In this data collection. Three
data collection periods are Included In the da-
Sampling: A random sample of 676 male pa. taset, and there are nIne flies. The first three
rolees was selected from the population of tiles contain data taken from a total random
4,084 Inmates released on parole by the sample of offenders housed at five prisons.
Michigan Parole Department during calendar File one was taken from the first data collec-
year 1980. tion period, file two from the second, and file
three from the thIrd data collectIon period.
Extent of collection: 2 data files The fourth file Is an additional sample from
the state of Connecticut of those Inmates
Card Image data format serving determinate sentences, collected dur-
Ing the third period of data collection. The fifth
Part 1 file Is indeterminate sample data from data
Parolees file collection periods one and two while the sixth
rectangular file structure file is indeterminate panel sample data taken
676 cases from collection period three. The seventh and
38 variables eighth files are determinate panel sample
80·unit-long record data from collection periods one and two, re-
1 record per case spectively. The ninth and final file is determi-
nate panel sample data from collectlon period
Part 2 three. There were six questionnaires used In
Crimes file collecting these data. The following Issues
rectangular file structure are covered In the questionnaires: inmates'
617 cases feelings about their arrest, court case, and
112 variables conviction, feelings about the law, physical
80-unlt-long record problems developed during prison term, how
6 records por case time Is spent In prison, family contacts outside
prison, relationships with other prisoners and
Related Publication: staff (guards), Involvement In prison pro·
Bradshaw, R.A. grams, and crlm!nal history. Each file has 550
"Multlvariate actuarial predletlon of felonl· records. The logical record length of each file
ous recidivism of male parolees: Compara· Is 80. Class IV
tlve cross-validation of two risk assess-
ment models on a Michigan sample.·
Unpublished dissertation, Michigan State
University, 1986.
Harper, Dean
Crime and mental disorder, 1972
(ICPSR 9088)

This study was sponsored by the United States


Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus·
tice. The grant number Is OJP·85·M-431.

44 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Summary: The purpose of this data collection Related Publication:
was to explore the relationship between crime Harper, D.
and mental disorder among Jallinmatos. ·Crlme and mental disorder." Unpublished
Three sample groups were studied: Jail In- final report submitted to the National Instl·
mates who had psychiatric contacts, jail In- tute of Justice, Washington, DC, 1986.
mates who did not have psychiatric contacts,
and a control group of psychiatric patients
who were not In Jan. Psychiatric diagnosis his-
tory for Inmates and patients with psychiatric
contacts spanning 18 years (1960-1977) Is Hartigan, Richard
available along with each subjecrs crime re- Cost effectiveness of misdemeanant
cord and sentencing history. Variables Include probation In Hamilton County, OhiO,
demographic characteristics, type of offenses
sentenced, and number of arrests. Also In- 1981·1982
cluded are psychiatric contact Information In- (ICPSR 8259)
cluding date of contact, diagnosis, type of
service given, date of treatment termination, THs study was sponsored by the United States
and reason for termination. Class IV Department at Justlce, National Institute of Jus-
tlee. The grant number Is 8O-IJ·CX-0083.
Universe: Prisoners who served time In a
county jail In the United States I. , 1972. Summary: This research was designed to de-
termina whether or not the supervision 01 mis-
Sampling: The sample Is composed of 617 demeanant probationers was cost-effective
prisoners who served time In a county Jail dur- for Increasing the level of succassful proba-
Ing 1972. Among these Individuals. 386 had tion completions !n Hamilton County, Ohio.
psychiatric contacts either before or after their Tha primary objective was to examine the ra-
Imprisonment (I.e., between 1960 and 1977) lationships among these factors: suparvision
and 231 did not. A control group of 386 psy- costs, the col/ection of court costs, fines, and
chiatric patients who had not eerved Jail time restitution, typas of supervision, risk assess-
during 1972 was also selected from the lists ment and probationer conduct for the popula-
of the Psychiatric Case Register. These pa- tion of probationer'!. Probationers were In-
tients were matched to Jail inmates with the itially classified according to risk assessment
psychiatric contacts on the following charac- and then randomly assigned to a supervision
teristics: year of first psychiatric contact, cen- category. Probationer's riSK potential was a
sus tract of first contact, birth year, gonder, numerical score derived from demographic
and race. background variables, prior record, and his-
tory of substance use. The DSCP (Degree of
Note: The file has a variable number of re- Successful Completion of Probation) was da-
cords per case because It Is hierarchically veloped specifically to measure probationer
structured at two levels: (1) the Individual conduct and to compare trends and relation-
level and (2) the psychiatric contact level. For ships. Data were collected on 2,756 misde-
each Individual there are at least two SO-col- meanant probation experiences batween
umn records of data. For each prisoner with January 1. 1981 and December 31, 1982.
psychiatric contacts and for each control Tha variables examined In the study Include:
group patient. there are one or more addi- risk assessment at Intake, supervision level
tional 80-column records, each representing assigned, number of times the probationer
a separate entry In the Psychiatric Case Reg- was assigned to probation. start and planned
ister. At the least, a case would have 58 vari- termination dates. date of last status change.
ables describing it, at most, 1.103. For rea- status at termlnatlon, degree oJ successful
sons of confidentiality, all references that completion of probation achieved, costs in-
would Identify the geographic location of this curred in administering probation, and
study have been blanked In the documenta- amounts collected from each probationer for
tion and blanked or recoded in the data. court costs, restitution and fines. The data are
contained in three liIes. Although data were
Extent of collection: 1 data file col/ected on 7,072 misdemeanant probation
experiences, there are only 2,756 probation-
Card Image data format ers Included In the study. The remaining
4,316 cases were excluded due to failure of
hierarchical file structure the probationer to show up for screening or
80-unlt-long record for other reasons that did not meet the re-
search criteria. For these 2,756 probationers,
there are 6,618 records of actual misdemean-

Corrections - adult 45
ant experience In the data file. Each record from 75 percent of the mainline Inmates out of
represents one experience, so It Is possible a population of 25,838 male felons.
for an Individual probationer to have multiple
records. There are 16 variables per case. All Extent of collection: 6 data files + machine-
three files have logical record lengths of 80 readable documentation
characters. Class IV
Card Image data format

Part 1
Census
Holeman, Herbert and Barbara J. rectangular file structure
Krepps-Hess 386 cases
Women correctional officers In 31 variables
80-unlt-long record
California, 1979 1 record per case
(ICPSR 8684)
Part 2
This study was sponsored by the United States Staff
Depa1ment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- rectangular file structure
tice. The grant number Is 79-NI-AX-0006. 241 cases
49 variables
Summary: This study examines women cor- 80-unit·long record
rset/onal officers working In California's male 1 record per case
institutions, focusing on three aspects: (1)
demographic characteris~cs of the female offi- Part 3
cers, (2) assessments of their ability to per- Inmate
form the jobs, and (3) attitudes of male and fe- rectangular file structure
male officers and inmates about female 400 cases
correctional officers. Class IV 41 variables
80·unit-long record
Universe: Male and female correctional offl- 1 record per case
cers and felons in 11 California male inmate
Institutions. Part 4
Profile
Sampling: Three different samples were col- rectangular file structure
lectl;ld: (1) A department-wide census that In- 252 cases
cluded every female corrootional officer work- 32 variables
Ing in the 11 California male inmate 80-unit·long record
institutions. This Includes baseline data for 1 record per case
386 female correctional officers. (2) Job per-
formance data from 168 female correctional Part 5
officers was matched (using age and job ten- Female
ure) with 168 male correctional officers. Only rectangular file structure
seven of the 11 Institutions were used since 168 cases
four of the Institutions employed less than 24 53 variables
female officers. For this reason, 24 women BO-unlt-Iong record
and 24 men were selected from each of 1 record per case
these seven institutions. For those institutions
employing more than 24 women officers, a Part 6
random digit table was used to select 24 Male
women. (3) Survey responses were gathered rectangular file structure
from structured attitude questionnaires given 168 cases
to 182 male and 59 female correctional offi- 53 variables
cers and 400 Inmates from seven Institutions. 80-unit·long record
For the officer sample, a proportionate strati- 1 record per case
fied random sample was conducted, using
the seniority listing of correctional officers.
The sample was stratified by sex and Institu-
tion so It would be representative of all correc-
tional officers In California Within each strata,
10 percent of the officers were selected. For
the inmate sarrlple, the selection Was made

46 National Archive of Criminal Justk;e Data


Lattimore, Pamela K. (2) Sandhilis Inmate Enrollment File: enroll-
ment date, demographic characteristics, em-
Sandhllls [North Carolinal vocational ployment history, type of current offenses
delivery sys\tem evaluation project, committed, sentence length, highest grade
1983·1987 completed at cOnflnement, and date and rule
violation. (3) Poik/Harnett Inmate Enrollment
(lCPSR 9224) File: enrollment date, demographic charac-
teristics, employment history, type of current
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States offenses committed, and sentence length. (4)
Depmment of Justice, Nalioncl Institute of Jus- Inmate Post Release File: current activity, pre-
~t'e. The groot number Is 85-IJ-CX-0060. sent job, job satisfaction rating, number of
hours worked, length of job search, othsr job
*'iummary: This data collection was designed In last period, and why left previous activities.
to eValuate the effectiveness of a vocational (5) Inmate Unemployment File: monthly
tralrl~g program on post-release vocational county unemployment rates during June
skills, employment, and recidivism of youthful 1983-December 1985. (6) County Crime
male Inmates 18 to 21 years old. The study Rate File: county crime rrues for five semian-
used an experimental design to examine the nual periods July 1983-December 1985. (7)
differences In post-release activities among County Population Fiie: monthly population
three Inmate groups. Acomprehensive in- in Sandhills Youth Center and Cameron Morri-
mate data base was created to describe In- son Youth Center between June 19B3 and
mates' confinement history, employment his- March 1987. (8) Inmate Confinement File:
tory, and their criminal records. The date of admission, type of conditional release,
contextual data files provide addltlonallnfor- custody level, gaIn time rate, parole records,
mation relevant to Inmates' post-release activi- type of offense committed, type of offender
ties. Class IV classified, sentence results, type of work re-
lease, and work rating. (9) Inmate Recidivism
Universe; Youthful Inmates 18-21 years old In File: date of admission, time from enrollment
North Carolina. to new admission, type of new offense, num-
ber of prior sentences, and total consecutive
Sampling: Three study groups were formed In maximum-minimum sentence. (10) Inmate
two stages of the study: an external compari- Probation Record File: supervision level as-
son group, an internal control group, and an signed, supervision costs charged, type of as-
Internal experimental group. Arandom sam- sessment, total needs score, type of convic-
ple was Internally selected from two diagnos- tion, sentence type, type of release, probation
tic centers: Polk and Harnett Youth Centers status, attitude of parole, social Identification,
for Youthful Inmates ages 18 to 21 in North and risk Items verified. (11) Inmate JaIl Educa-
Carolina. The sample was divided into two tion File: date and type of training, education
categories: an external comparison group completed in prison, and complete scores.
and an experimental-control group desig- (12) Inmate Arrest File: arrest sequence num-
nated for transfer to the Sandhills and ber, date and location of arrest, offenses
Cameron Morrison Youth Centers. The trans- charged, and disposition of arrest. (13) In-
ferred group members were screened by ad- mate Wage Rle: date released, number of
ditional criteria for sample selection. Qualified employers In each quarter during 1983-1987,
members were then randomly assigned to and wages paid In each quarter during 1983-
either the experimental group or to the Inter- 1987.
nal control group. These three groups re-
sulted in 295 experimental group cases, 296 Extent of collection: 13 data files
internal control group cases, and 236 external
comparison group cases. Logical record length data format
Note: Some variables In this collection have Part 1
undocumented codes. Also, the data for sev- Inmate activity file
eral variables are inconsistent with formats or rectangular file structure
code descriptions provided In the documenta- B,978 cases
tion. Files and variables presented in this col- 18 variables
lection Include: (1) Inmate Activity File: type of 111-unit.long record
activity received, arncUllt of time spent in ac- 1 record per case
tivity, scores at beginning and completion of
activity, reason for ending activity, vocational
and academic programs, drug and alcohol
counseling, and in-prison work assignments.

Corrections - adult 47
Part 2 Part 9
Sandhills inmat') enrollment Inmate recidivism file
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
591 cases 157 cases
153 variables 80 variables
1,085-unlt-long record 595-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 3 Part 10
Polk/Harne" inmate enrollment file Inmate probation record file
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
236 cases 1,108 cases
88 variables 752 variables
590-unlt-long record 2,948-unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 4 Part 11
Inmate post release file Inmate jail education file
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
925 cases 815 cases
60 variables 130 variables
445-unit-long record 936-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 5 Part 12
Inmate unemployment file Inmate arrest file
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
31 cases 6,012 cases
102 variables 10 variables
415-unlt-long record 66-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 6 Part 13
County crime rate file Inmate wage data file
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
100 cases 533 cases
7 variables 45 variables
56-unit-long record 336-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 7 Related Publication:


County population file Lattimore, P.K., A.D. VVitte, and J.K. Baker
ractangular file structure "The Sandhllls vocational delivery system
50 cases experiment: An experimentation of correc-
7 variables tional program Implementation and effec-
64-unlt-long record tiveness." Washington, DC: Unpublished fi-
1 record per case nal report submitted to the National
Institute of Justice, 1988.
Part 8
Inmate confinement file
rectangular file structure
815 cases
436 variables Los Angeles District Attorney's Office
3,041-unlt-long record Operation hardcore [crime] evaluation:
1 record per case Los Angeles, 1976·1980
(ICPSR 9038)

This stu~1 was sponsored by tho United States


Department of Jus~ce, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number is 81-IJ-CX-OOS1.

48 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Summary: The Operation Hardcore [Crime] McCarthy, Jack, D. Randall Smtth, and
Evaluation was a special prosecutorial pro- William R. Smtth
gram which was developed and Implemonted
by the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office Effects of sentences on subsequent
to examine the effectiveness of specialized criminal behavior In New Jersey,
prosecutorlal activities in dealing with the lo- 1976-1977
cal problem of rislnl1 gang violence. One part
of the evaluation was a system performance (ICPSR 8986)
analysis, a quantitative assessment of how
criminal justice agencies handled criminal Inci- llis study \W,$ sponsored by the United States
dents Involving gang violence. This Included Department of Jus~ce, National Institute of Jus~
the analysis of data describing actions taken tice. The grant number Is SS-IJ-CX-0005.
by several criminal justice agencies In the
complete process of handling of criminals and Summary: This data collection examines the
criminal Incidents. The purposes of this sys- effects of sentencing on offenders' sub-
tem performance analysis were: to describe sequent criminal behaviors. Special charac-
the problems of gang violence In Los Angeles teristics of the collection Include detailed Infor-
and the ways that Incidents of gang violence mation on the demographic and psychological
have been handled by the Los Angeles crimi- background of defendants, a description of
nal Justice system; to document the activities the offenses and the victims, and criminal re-
of the special gang prosecution unit, Opera- cidivism information fOf adult defendants.
tion HardcOI'e, and the criminal Justice han- More specifically, the file contains data on the
dling of the cases prosecuted by that unit; defendant's family, educational background t
and to evaluate the &;.(tent to which Operation psychological condition, social activities, finan-
Hardcore has affected criminal justice han- cial status, employment history, substance
dling of gang violence. The Los Angeles Dis- abuse, prior and follow-up criminal records,
trict Attorney's Office systematically screens sentence and correctional histories, and other
all referrals from local police agencies and disposition Information. Class IV
keeps computer-generated listings of a1llndl-
vlduals referred for prosecution. These list- Universe: All court cases heard in the New
Ings, one for acceptances and one for rejec- Jersey State Court from October 1976 to Sep-
tions, are kept for each year. These listings tember 1977.
were used to identify those individuals Identi-
fied by the police who were subsequently Sampl1ng: Court cases involving robbery, bur-
prosecuted by the District Attorney. Finally, glary, or drug offenses ware selected for the
the District Attorney maintains working files sample.
on all cases prosecuted by deputies In his of-
fice. These case files Include copies of police, Note: Work is continuing on this collection by
court, and criminal history records, as well as the principal investigators. Researchers
information on case prosecution and were should note that estimates derived from these
used as the primary source of data describing data may not be reliable.
criminal Justice handling. Several supplemen-
tary sources were used Include the auto- Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
mated Prosecuters Management Information readable documentation
System (PROM IS) maintained by the District
Attorney's Office, and court records In the Su- Card image data format
perior Court of California in Los Angeles
Country, the local felony court. The study is in rectangular file structure
6 parts: The Incident-based file has 14 vari- 6,257 cases
ables with 526 cases; The Case-based fila 1,321 variables
has 16 varlablas with 223 cases; The Victim- 80-unlt-long record
basad file has 14 variables with 659 cases; 32 records per case
The Suspect-based file has 17 variables with
1,016 cases; The Defendant-based file has Related Publication:
17 variables with 319 cases; The Charge- McCarthy, Jack
based file has 19 variables with 722 cases. "The effects of sentences on subsequent
Class II criminal behavior." Unpublished research
proposal submitted tn ~he National Insti-
tute of Justice.

Corrections - adult 49
Mande, Mary J. Part 2
Iowa data
Validation of the Rand selective rectangular file structure
Incapacitation survey and the Iowa 1,069 cases
risk assessment scale In Colorado, 157 variables
1982 and 1986 129-unit-long record
4 records per case
(lCPSR 9292)
Related Publications:
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States Mande, Mary J., and Kim English
Depa1ment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- "Estimating individual offending rates in
tice. The grait number Is 84-IJ-CX-0034. Colorado." Washington, DC: Unpublished
final report submitted to the National Insti-
Summary: This data collection was designed tute of Justice, 1987.
to replicate the Rand Selective Incapacitation Mande, Mary J., and Kim English
SUrvey and the Iowa Risk Assessment Scale "Validation of the Iowa assessment scale
using a group of Colorado offenders. The on a 1982 release cohort of Colorado In-
Iowa model provides two assessments of of- mates: Washington, DC: Unpublished fi-
fender risk: (1) a measure of general risk to nal report submitted to the Nationallnsti-
society and (2) a measure of the risk of new tute of Justice, 1988.
violence. The Iowa dataset Includes crime in-
formation from defendants' self-reports and
from official crime records. Both files contain
important self-report items such as perceived
probability of being caught, weapon used in Manpower Demonstration Research
the offense committed, months free on the Corporation
street during the reference period, and de- National supported work evaluation
tailed activity description during the free pe-
riod. Other items covered Include employ- study, 1975-1979: Public use files
ment history, plans, reasons for committing (ICPSR 7865)
the crime, and attitudes toward life, lem, pris-
ons, and police. Class IV The National Supported Work Demonstration
(of which this study Is an evaluation) was a
Universe: Incoming male inmates and re- transitional, subsidized work experience pro-
leased inmates in Colorado. gram for four target groups of people with
longstanding employment problems: ex-of-
Sampling: The sample for replicating the fenders, former drug addicts, women who are
Rand study was an incoming cohort of 313 long term recipients of welfare benefits, and
males sentenced to the Colorado Department school dropouts, many with criminal records.
of Corrections in 1986. Inmates housed at the For four years, at 15 locations across the
Reception and Diagnostic Unit were selected country, the program provided up to 12 to 18
first from an alphabetical list and later by loca- months of employment to a total of about
tion of cell block. Inmates backlogged at COlKlty 10,000 individuals. In ten of these sites-At-
jails Wf1:e systematically selected from a list. lanta, Chicago, Hartford, Jersey City, Newark,
The sample for validation of the Iowa model New York, Philadelphia, Oakland, San Fran-
was selected from all Inmates released from cisco and Wisconsln-6,600 eligible appli-
prison in 1982 who had been sentenced in the cants were randomly assigned either to ex-
districts of Denvf1:, Jefff1:son, EI Paso, or Mesa perimental groups (offered a job in supported
These districts were selected because of their work) arlo control groups, and an evaluation
well-maintained criminal records. was conducted on the effects of the Sup-
ported Work program. At the time of enroll-
Extent of collection: 2 data files ment, each respondent was given a retrospec-
tive baseline intf1:View, generally covering the
Logical record length data format previous two years, which was followed by up
to four follow-up Interviews scheduled at nine-
Part 1 month intervals. Each interview collected data
Rand data on demographic characteristics, ernployment
rectangular file structure history, job search, mobility, household in-
313 cases come, housing, and respondent's drug use.
584 variables AFDC recipients were further asked about
931-unit-long record children in school and welfare participation,
1 record per case while all non-AFDC respondents were ques-

50 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


tioned about any extralegal activities. Two Universe: Male tnmates released from the
public use flies have been compiled from this North Carolina Prison SystGm during the first
data collection, the SUpported Work Employ- six months of 1980.
ment and Earnings File and the Supported
Work Deviant Behavior File. Eaci: file con- Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
talns data for 6,500 persons for up to five In- readable documentation
terviews. The Employment and Earnings Fife
contalns data from all interview modules EX- Card Image data format
CEPT the drug and crime sections; the Devi-
ant Behavior File contains all variables on the rectangular file structure
Employment and Earnings File and adds 1,425 cases
drug and crime Information. Each respondent 53 variables
has up to six logical, fixed-!ength records, 80-unit-long record
with each record corresponding to a com- 11 records per case
pleted Interview (up to five) and one addi-
tional short "cross-document" record. These
files are currently available only In fourbyte bi-
nary. They may be read using IBM (compat-
ible) Fortran. The binary files require three MeSSinger, Sheldon
2,400 foot magnetic tapes written at 6,250 Characteristics and movement of
b.p.1. or 4-6 reels at 1,600 b.p.!. A User's felons in California prisons, 1945·1964
Guide describing the collection and its compo-
nents is available and should be read before (ICPSR 7971)
the collection or any part of it is ordered.
Class IV This study was Sponsoied by the United States
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number Is 78-NJ·AX·OO93.

Marsden, Mary Ellen and Thomas Orsagh Summary: Felons In the California prison sys-
tem are documented In this data collection.
Matching treatment and offender: Information is provided for each felon who
North Carolina, 1980·1982 was committed to the Department of Correc-
tions, returned to prison as a parole violator,
(ICPSR 8515) paroled, suspended from or reinstated on pa-
role, discharged, or who died or was exe-
This study was sponsored by the United States cuted from January 1, 1945 through Decem-
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- ber 31, 1964. The df.ta are arranged by year
tice. The gT~t number Is 81-IJ-CX-0061. and type of movement. Each record contains
Information on certain characteristics of the
Summary: The purpose of this data collection person involved, such as age at admission,
was to evaluate the implications of rational race, marital status, education, military his-
choice theory for offender rehabilitation. The tory, occupation, number of prior arrests, es-
hypothesis of the research was that income- cape record, date and type of releases, and
enhancing prison rehabilitation programs are parole violations. Class IV
most effective for the economically motivated
offender. The offender was characterized by Note: All files are rectangular, with logical re-
demographic and socioeconomic charac- cord lengths of 50 characters, and one record
teristics, criminal history and behavior, and per case. There are approximately 55 variables
work activities during Incarceration. Informa- in each file. Prisoner serial numbers have been
tion was also collected on type of release and extrooted for reasons of confidentiality.
postrelease recidivistic and labor market
measures. Recidivism was measured by ar- Extent of collection: 128 data files
rests, convictions, and reincarcerations after
release, length of time Until first arrest after re- Logical record length data format
lease, and seriousness of offense leading to
incarceration. Class IV Admissions to prison
17 female (1945-54. 1959-64).3 male (1945.
Sampling: Males who had been in prison at 1957,1964) files
least six months, who had not been out of 87-368 female, 1,950-5,010 male cases
prison for significant periods of time during
their recent incarcerations, and who had been
released into North Carolina.

Corrections - adult 51
Parole releases sonalincome, mobility, and drug treatment, if
16 female (1945-55, 1959-64),3 male (1945, any. There are four files In the data collection,
1957,1964) files each one containing 5,438 card-Image re-
50-560 female, 1,560-7,230 male cases cords. Class IV

Suspension of parole
16 female (1945-55, 1959-61, 1963-64),
2 male (1957, 1964) files Palumbo, Dennis J., Michael Musheno,
1-487 female, 1,170-4,230 male cases
and Steven Maynard-Moody
Reinstatement of parole Implementation of community
2 female (1963-64), 2 male (1957, 1964) files corrections In Oregon, Colorado, and
150-167 female, 270-600 male cases
Connecticut, [1981]
Parole violator returned (ICPSR 8407)
17 female (1945-55, 1958-61, 1963-64),
2 male (1957, 1964) files This study was sponsored by the United States
15-285 female, 1,380-3,300 male cases Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number Is 82-15-CU-K015.
Institutional termination to prison
18 female (1945-55, 1958-64),2 male (1957, Summary: Data were collected from three
1964) files states to evaluate the success of community
2-25 female, 960-1,050 male cases corrections programs and to identify the condi-
tions that underlie these successes. Personal
Active parole termination field Interviews and mall questionnaires were
17 female (1945-55,1959-64),1 male (1964) files used on state, county, and district levels. The
296 female, 2,580 male cases variables in the study were designed to exam-
ine the kind of people who implement and
Inactive parole termination maintain these programs, the level of commit-
18 female (1946-47, 1953-55, 1959, 1961, ment by judicial and prison officials to these
1963-64), 1 male (1964) files programs, community support, and the goals
1-55 female, 210 male cases of cost reduction, work training, and rehabilita-
tion. The data for this collection are contained
in eight files. Three files of SPSS control
cards document the eight data files. There
Nurco, David are 920 cases in Connecticut, 3171n Colo-
rado, and 444 In Oregon. The logical record
Crime days precursors study: length of all the files Is 80 characters. Class IV
Baltimore, 1952·1976
(lCPSR 8222)

TIls study was sponsored by the United States Pearson, Frank S.


Department of Justice, Nationa/lnstitute of Jus- Intensive supervision program In New
tice. The grant number Is 82-IJ-CX-0031.
Jersey, 1983·1986
Summary: This study focuses on 354 male (lCPSR 9291)
narcotic addicts who were selected using a
stratified random sample from a population of This study was sponsored by the United States
6 149 known narcotic abusers arrested or Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
identified by the Baltimore, Maryland Police tice. The grant number Is 83·IJ-CX-K027.
Department between 1952 and 1976. The
sample was stratified based on race and year Summary: These data evaluate the New Jer-
of police contact. These data were collected sey Intensive Supervision Program (ISP), a
between July 1973 and January 1978. Vari- program implemented by the New Jersey De-
ables include respondent's use of marijuana, partment of Corrections in 1983-1986. The
hallucinogens, amphetamines, barbituates, central premise of ISP is that certain felony of-
codeine heroin, methadone, cocaine, tranquil- fenders sentenced to prison can be resen-
izers ~d other narcotics. Also of interest is tenced to a program of intensive supervision
the r~spondent's past criminal activity includ- in which they are successfully supervised in
ing arrests, length of incarceration, educa- the community. The data collection evaluates
tional attainment, employment history, per-

52 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


the Impact of ISP on recidivism rates, prison Peterson, Mark A., Suzanne Polich, and
space avallabillty, and cost effectiveness and Jan Michael Chaiken
also assesses the opinions of criminal justice
professionals toward the program. In the first SUlVey of California prison Inmates,
file data collected on four types of sentenced 1976
felons include education, psychological condi-
tion, financial status, substance abuse, prior (ICPSR 7797)
and follow-up criminal records, earning and
payment records, sentence and correctional This study was sponsored by the United States
histories, and case characteristics including Department of Jus~ce, National Institute of Jus-
sentences, offenses, and other dispositions. tice. The grant number Is 83-IJ-CX-OOOS.
The second file presents data on type of crimi-
nal justice professional interviewed .• opinion Summary: This survey of inmates In five Cali-
scale scores on aspects of ISP, and sugges- fornia prisons was conducted by the Rand
tions for ISP. Class IV Corporation with a grant from the National In-
stitute of Justice. Researchers distributed an
Universe: All sentenced felons In New Jersey anonymous self-administered questionnalre
from 1983 to 1985, and criminal justice profes- to groups of 10-20 Inmates at a time. Using
sionals in New Jersey. the self-report technique, the survey obtalned
detalled information about the crimes commit-
Sampllng: A computer program for random ted by these prisoners prior to their Incarcera-
sampling was used to select both ISP experi- tion. Variables were calculated to examine
mental groups and members of a compari- the characteristics of repeatedly arrested or
son/control group. A purposive sampling of convicted offenders (recidivists) as well as of-
criminal justice professionals was used to se- fenders reporting the greatest number of seri-
lect persons who had knowledge of the ISP ous crimes (habitual criminals). The variables
program. include crimes committed leading to incar-
ceration, rates of criminal activity, and soclal-
Extent of collection: 2 data files psychological scales for analyzing motiva-
tions to commit crimes. The collection
Card image data format contalns three files: the survey data, the docu-
mentation provided by the Rand Corporation,
Part 1 and frequency counts for the variables In the
Felons study. The collection is avallable in OSIRIS
rectangular file structure and card image formats. The data contaln in-
1,990 cases formation on 624 respondents with 21 cards
167 variables par respondent. Class II
80-unlt-iong record
6 records per case Related Publication:
Peterson. Mark A. and Harriet S. Sralker, with
Part 2 Suzanne Polich
Survey "Doing crime: A survey of California prison
rectangular file structure inmates." Santa Monica, CA: The Rand
60 cases Corporation, 1980.
11 variables
80-unit-long record
1 record per case
Prentky. Robert and Raymond Knight
Related Publication:
Pearson, Frank S. Dangerous sex offenders: Classifying,
"Research on New Jersey's Intensive su- predicting, and evaluating outcomes
pervision program: Washington, DC: Un- of clinical treatment In Bridgewater,
published report submitted to the National
Institute of Justice, 1987. Massachusetls,1982-1985
(ICPSR 8985)

This study was sponsored by the United States


Departmant of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number is 82-IJ-CX-0058.

Summary: The purpose of this data collection


was to validate two classification systems,

Corrections - adult 53
one for rapists and one for child molesters, Summary: This data collection focuses on
used In a Massachusetts treatment center for problems in the women's correctional system
sexually aggressive offenders. Rapists and and examines specifically the origins and de-
child molesters were classified as two types velopment of prisoner and sentencing charac-
of sex offenders and then clinically classified teristics In three states. Information Is in-
Into different subtypes based on criteria for cluded on parents' place of birth, occupation,
the two taxonomies being tested. Variables In- marital status, offense, sentence, prior com-
clude type of traffic offenses, criminal of- mitments, method of release from prison, and
fenses, and sex offenses charged. Data on presence of crime partners. Class IV
dispositions of cases are also provided along
with parole and discharge Information. Of- Sampling: Cases were Identified from official
fenders' post-release offenses were catego- prison records that included a time span of
rized into traffic offenses, non-traffic offenses ten years before and after the opening of
and sex offenses. Class IV separate women's state prisons.

Universe: All sex offender cases referred to a Universe: All women housed In State prisons
treatment center In Brldgewata-, Massachu- from 1800 to 1935.
setts for Intensive observation and then
released. Extent of collection: 1 data file
Sampling: Of the 1,500 sex offender cases Card image data format
that were referred to the treatment center In
Bridgewater, Massachusetts for intensive ob- rectangular tile structure
servation during 1982-1985, 500 ware com- 4,609 cases
mitted and became treatment patients. Of 30 variables
these patients, 270 were released after vary- 80-unit-long record
ing lengths of treatment and were selected as 3 records per case
the sample in the study.
Related Publication:
Extent of collection: 1 data file Rafter, Nicole Hahn
Partial justice: Women In state prisons,
logical record length data format 1800-1935. Boston, MA: Northeastern Uni-
versity Press, 1985.
rectangular file structure
270 cases
332 variables
2,197-unit-long record
1 record per case The Rand Corporation
Effects of prison versus probation in
Related Publications: California, 1980-1982
Prentky, R.A., and A.A. Knight
"Impulsivity in the lifestyle and criminal be- (ICPSR 8700)
havior of sexual offenders." Criminal Jus-
tice and Behavior 13 (1986), 141 -164. This study was sponsored by the United States
Knight, R.A., R. Rosenberg, and B. Schneider Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
Classification of sexual assault: A research tice. The grant number Is 83-IJ-CX-QOO2.
hancbook. New York, NY: Garlard, 1985.
Summary: This study was divided Into two
phases. The first assessed the effects of dif-
ferent sanctions on separate criminal popula-
Rafter, Nicole Hahn tions, focusing on probation as a sentencing
alternative for felons. The second phase used
Women In prison, 1800-1935: a quasi-experimental design to address how
Tennessee, New York, and Ohio imprisonment affects criminal behavior when
criminals are released. Specific Issues In-
(ICPSR 8481) cluded (a) the effect which imprisonment (vs.
probation) and length of time served have on
This study was sponsored by the United States recidivism, (b) the amount of crime prevented
Depa1ment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- by imprisoning offenders rather than placing
tice. The grant number i~ 79-NI-AX-0039. them on probation, and (e) costs to the sys-
tem for achieving that reduction in crime.
Class IV

54 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Universe: Convicted offenders. The Rand Corporation
Sampling: Statewide file covers convictions In Survey of jail and prison Inmates, 1978
the 17 largest counties In California Prisoner (ICPSR 8169)
and Probationer files cover Los Angeles and
Alameda counties. ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Jus~ce, National Institute of Jus-
Note: For reasons of confldentlallly,lndlvldual tice. The grarlt number Is 83-IJ-CX-0006.
Identifiers and dates have been deleted from
the fifes. Summary: This survey was conducted as part
of the Rand Corporation's research program
Extent of collection: 3 data files + SAS control on career criminals. Rand's Second Inmate
cards Survey was sdmlnlstered In late 1978 and
early 1979 to convicted male Inmates at 12
Card Image data format with SAS control prisons and 14 county jails In California, Michi-
cards gan and Texas. The purpose of the study was
to provide detalled information about the crimi-
Part 1 nal behavior of offenders and their associated
Statewide database characteristics. Emphasis was placed on In-
rectangular file structure vestigating other major areas of interest SUch
12,324 cases as the quality of prisoner self-reports, varie-
66 variables ties of criminal behavior, selective Incapaclta.
80-unit-long record tion, and prison treatment programs. Class IV
2 records per case
Part 1: Primary survey from Modules A·E
Part 2 for all inmates
Probationer sample Part 2: Retest survey from Modules A·E
rectangular file structure Part 3: Primary survey from Module F
611 cases Part 4: Retest survey from Module F
120 variables Part 5: Official record data for California
80-unlt-long record prisoners
5 records per case Part 6: Official record data for Michigan
prisoners
Part 3 Part 7: Official record data for Texas
Prison sample prisoners
rectangular file structure Part 8: Primary survey from Modules A·E
511 cases for Texas prisoner replacements
122 variables Part 9: Primary survey from Module F for
aO-unlt-long record Texas prisoner replacements
5 records per case Part 10: Official records data for Texas
prisoner replacements
Related Publications: Part 11: Survey from Modules A·E for
Petersilia, J. Texas jail respondents
"Research in brief: Probation and felony of- Part 12: Primary survey from Modules A·E
fenders: Washington, D.C.: Nationallnsti- for all inmates
tute of Justice, 1985. Part 13: Retest survey from Modules A·E
Peters ilia, J., S. Turner, and J. Kahan {frequencies}
"Granting felons probation: Public risks Part 14: Primary survey from Module F
and alternatives." Santa Monica, CA: The (frequencies)
Rand Corporation, 1985. Part 15: Retest survey from Module F
Petersilia, J., S. Turner, and J. Peterson (frequencies)
"Prison versus probation In California: Im- Part 16: Official record data for California
plications for crime and offender recidi- prisoners (frequencies)
vism." Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Cor- Pat117: Official record data for Michigan
poration, 1986. prisoners (frequencies)
Part 18: Official record data for Texas
prisoners (frequencies)
Part 19: Primary survey from Modules A·E
for Texas prisoner replacements
(frequencies)

Corrections - adult 55
Part 20: Primary survey from Module F for mlsslonsrrermlnatlons files represents data
Texas prisoner replacements on an Individual probationer. There are 84
(frequencies) variables for 1,343 cases In the Reassess-
Part 21 : Official records data for Texas ment file and 218 variables for 1,922 cases In
prisoner replacements (frequencies) the Admlsslonsffermlnations file; both files
Part 22: Survey from Modules A-E for have logical record lengths of 100 characters.
Texas jail respondents (frequencies) Of the 1,922 cases for which admissions data
Part 23: Codebook were collected (about 133 variables), 397
Part 24: SAS control cards cases also have termination data available
Part 25: Follow-up data, California 1 (an additional 85 variables). Cases In the
Part 26: Follow-up data, California 2 Chronological file are records of probation
Part 27: Follow-up data, California 3 agent contacts with probationers over the
Part 28: Follow-up data, California 4 course of the study. There are 17 variables
Part 29: Follow-up data, Michigall1 for 47,169 cases (contacts) In this file which
Part 30: Follow-up data, Michigan 2 Includes Information on 1,781 probationers.
Part 31 : Follow-up data, Michigan 3 As many as 270 contacts with a single proba-
Part 32: Follow-up data, Michigan 4 tioner are recorded. this file has a logical re-
Part 33: Follow-up data, Texas 1 cord length of 80. Class IV
Part 34: Follow-up data, Texas 2
Part 35: Follow-up data, Texas 3
Part 36: Follow-up data, Texas 4
rectangular file structure Rossi, Peter
68 to 6,883 cases per part Transitional aid research project
8 to 455 variables per part (TARP), 1976·1977
43- to 133-unlt-long records per part
1 to 10 records per case per part (ICPSR 7874)

The Transitional Aid Research Project


(TARP) was an experiment conducted In
Romm, Joseph Texas and Georgia in 1976-1977. Stratified
random samples of Inmates were assigned,
Evaluation of Intensive probation In at the time of release from prison, to experi-
Milwaukee, 1980-1981 mental and control groups. The groups varied
In the amount of money and job placement
(ICPSR 8276) services they received upon their release.
Originally, the data were recorded In nine files
This study was sponsored by the United States for each state, corresponding to each of the
Depa1ment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- nine different sources of Information for each
tice. The grCV'\t number Is J-LEAH-027-78. TARP case. These files Included each In-
mate's prison history, data from four Inter-
Summary: The purpose of this study was to views, state arrest data, record of TARP pay-
evaluate the results and Impact of a two-year ments, social security wages and parole
experiment In Innovative probation practices records. The ICPSR dataset has comblneJ
In Milwaukee, Wisconsin. After being classi- these Into one file for each state. There are
fied according to the Wisconsin risk and 1,590 variables for each of 1,975 cases In the
needs assessment scale, ondividuals who had Texas file and 1,921 variables for each of
been sentenced to probation between Janu- 2,007 cases In the Georgia file. Class II
ary 2, 1980 and June 30, 1981 and had re-
ported to the probation department for intake
were randomly assigned to one of eight
experimental and control groups. The experi-
ment was limited to adult residents of Milwau- Schmidt, Peter and Ann D. Witte
kee County who were not already on proba- Predicting recidivism in North
tion, were not judged to be severe psychotic Carolina, 1978 and 1980
or severe sex-dev!ant cases, and were not as-
signed to jail work-release sentences of more (ICPSR 8987)
than ten days followed by probation (Huber
cases). There are three files In this data col- This study was sponsored by the United States
lection: the Reassessment file, the Admis- Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
slonsrrerminations file, and the Chronological tice. The grant number is 84-IJ-CX-0021.
file. Each case In the Reassessment and Ad-

56 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Summary: This data collection examines the Snortum, John R.
relationship between Individual characteristics
and recidivism for two cohorts of Inmates re- Drinking and driving: A survey of
leased from North Carolina prisons In 1987 licensed drivers In the United States,
and 1980. The survey contains questions on 1983
the backgrounds of the ollenders, Including
their Involvement In drugs or alcohol, level of (ICPSR 8356)
schooling, nature of the crime resulting In the
sample conviction, number of prior Incarcera· ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
tlons, and recidivism following release from Department of Justice, National Instttute of Jus·
the sample Incarceration. The data collection tice. The grMt number Is 82-IGCX·0059.
also contains In/ormation on the length of
time until recidIvism occurs. Class IV Summary: The drinking and driving habits of
Americans are examined In this study. The
Universe: All Individuals released from North universe for the survey was adults 16 years
Carolina prisons during the periods of July 1, of age and older who possessed a valid
1977, through June 30,1978, and July 1, drlver's license. The first 1,000 cases were
1979, through June 30, 1980. drawn using a national probability sample of
the 48 contiguous states, while the flnal 400
Note: For 1978 data, 4,709 Individual records cases were selected from oversampling In 20
were missing one or more variables and states. Conditions were Imposed to yield ap-
placed In a missing data file. The other 4,618 proximately 50 percent males and 50 percent
obs9fVatlons, which contained complete Infor- females resulting In 1,401 cases In all. Re-
mation, were randomly split Into an estimation spondents were Interviewed over the tele·
sample of 1,540 observations and a valida· phone using random digit dialing. The ques-
tlon sample of 3,078. For 1980 data, 3,810 In· tionnaire contains 51 questions. Respondents
divldual records were missing Information on are asked about their frequency of consump-
one or more variables and were placed In a tion of alcoholic beverages, where they most
missing data file. The other 5,739 observa- often drink and their mode of transportation to
tions, which contained complete Information, and from this location, their driving and drink·
were randomly split Into an estimation sample ing eXperiences, and their age, sex, educa-
of 1,435 obs9fVatlons and a validation sam- tional attainment, and socioeconomic status.
ple of 4,304 obs9fVations. The study contains one file that has a logical
record length of SO characters for each of the
Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine· 1,401 cases. Class IV
readable dOCUmentation
Related Publications:
Card Image data format Snortum, J.R., D.E. Berger, and R. Hauge
"Legal knowledge and compliance: Drink-
Part 1 ing and driving in Norway and the United
1978 data States." Alcohol, Drugs, and Driving 4
rectangular file structure (1988), 251-263.
9,327 cases Berger, D.E., and J.R. Snortum
19 variables "A structural model of drinking and driving:
SO·unlt·long record Alcohol consumption, social norms, and
1 record per case moral commitments." Criminology 24
{19S6),139-153.
Part 2 Snorturn, J.R., and D.E. Berger
1980 data "Detecting the 'dark figure' of compliance."
9,549 cases Journal of Criminal Justice 14 (1986), 475-
19 variables 489.
SO·unlt·long record
1 record per case
Related Publication:
Schmidt, P., and A.D. Witte
Predicting recidivism using survival mod-
els. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1988.

Corrections - adult 57
Wright, James and Peter Rossi Wrlght,:<evln
Armed criminals In America: A survey Imprtwlng correctional classl1lcatJon,
of Incarcerated felons, 1983 New Y~r'hl 1981·1983
(ICPSR 8357) (ICPSR 8437)

Ttis study was sponsored by 1he United c'tates ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
Oepa1ment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grmt number Is 82-IJ-CX-OO'{ • tice. The grant number Is 83-IJCX-001.
Summary: The data for this study ~Iere col- Summary: There were three specific goals of
lected using salf-admlnlstered quesllonnalres this research. The first was to evaluate three
given to a non-probability sample of IrlCarcer- procedures currently available for the classifi-
ated felons In ten states. There are 1,874 cation of correctional Inmates: the Risk Analy-
cases (surveyed parsons) Included In this sis method, Megargee's MMPR Typology,
data collection with approximately 600 vari- and Toch's Prison Preference Inventory. Sec-
ables. Each case has 10 records of Informa- ond, the research devised and tested a post-
tion. The codebook contains information dlctlve model of adjustment to prison life,
about questionnaire wording, responses, cod- Third, a new classification scheme was devel-
Ing of the data, column location and frequen- oped for predicting Inmate adjustment to
cies. More specifically, the original question- prison life that considers Individual and organ-
naire wording Is Included as well as values for Izational (contextual) level factors and various
missing data. These data are contained In Interactions between the two. These data
one file, with SPSS control cards In a second were collected from a sample of 942 volun-
file. Information In the data Include socioeco- teer Inmates from ten New York state correc-
nomic status of the Inmate, prior criminal re- tional facilities, five of which were maximum
cord, drug use, weapon usage, family history, security five of which were medium security
and demographic Information on the Inmate. facilities. Only ona-half of the original 942 In-
The logical record length of the data file Is 89 mates completed the MMPI. Background and
characters; the SPSS control card file has 80 questionnaire data were collected during the
characters. Class IV summer and fall of 1983. Outcome data on
each Inmate Infraction were collected for a
three-year period prior to that time. Each
case In the first file represents survey re-
sponse data from an Individual Inmate. There
are 172 variables for 882 cases In this file. Of
the 172 variables, 56 are from the Prison Pref-
erence Questionnaire (PPQ), 86 are from the
Prison Environment Inventory (PEl), and the
remaining 30 are from the Prison Adjustment
Questionnaire (PAQ). Cases In the second
file are records of medical contacts and diag-
noses of Inmates' Illnesses. There are five
variables for the 12,502 cases. Class IV

58 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Corrections - juvenile

Children in Custody Series Bureau of Justice Statistics,


U.S. Department of Justice
The Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facll· Juvenile detention and correctional
Ity Census was conducted from 1971 to fttclllty census, 1973
1979/ In 1982, 1~·, 1987, and In 1989. Each
file Is described In this section. (ICPSR 7639)

The stUdy was designed by the Bureau of


Justice Statistics and conducted by the
Bureau of Justice Statistics, United States Bureau of the Census. The cen·
U.S. Department of Justice sus Includes Juvenile detention and correc.
tional facilities that were operated by state or
Juvenile detention and correctional local governments In November, 1973, and
facility census, 1971 had been In operation at least a month prior
to June 30, 1973. There are 794 records, one
(ICPSR 7637) for each Juvenile detention or correctional fa·
cllity. Each Is classified Into one of six catego-
The study was designed by the Department ries: detention centers; shelters; reception or
of Health, Education, and Welfare and the Bu· diagnostic centers; tralnlng schools; ranches,
reau of Justice Statistics and conducted by forestry camps and farms; halfway houses:
the United States Bureau of the Census. The and group homes. Data for 1973 Include:
census Includes JuvenUe detention and correc· state,county, and city Identification; level of
tional facilities that were operated by state or government responsible for the facility: type
local governments In October, 1971, and had of agency and agency Identification; number
been In operation at least a month prior to of admissions and discharges by type and
June 30, 1971, and had a resident population sex for the fiscal year 1973; quarterly resident
of at least 50 percent Juveniles. There are 722 population by detention status and sex; num·
records, one for each juvenile detention or ber of residents adjudged delinquent or de·
correctional facility. Each Is classlfled Into one clared In need of supervIsion by type of of·
of six categories: detention centers; shelters; fense and sex: average length of stay;
reception or diagnostic centers; training number of full· and part. time staff and vacan·
schools; ranches/ forestry camps and farms; cles by type of position and payroll status;
halfway houses and group homes. Data for and expenditures. Data were also collected
1973 Include: state, county, and city Identifica· for the fiscal year 1972 and Include: number
tion; level of g~ernment responsible for the of admlsslons and discharges by sex: resl·
facility; type of agency and agency Identifica· dent population by detentlon status and sex:
tion; resident populatlon by sex, age range, average length of stay; and expenditures.
detention status and offense; admissions and Data and documentation were prepared by
departures of population; average length of the Center for Advanced Computation, Univer-
st<y, staffing and expenditures; age and ca· sity of illinois, Urbana. Class II
paclty of facility; and programs and services
avallable. Data and documentation were pre· Related Publlcatlons:
pared by the Center for Advanced Computa· Statistics Division, National Criminal JUstice
tion, University of illinois, Urb&na. Class II Information and Statistics Service
·Children In custody: AdVance report on
Related Publication: the Juvenile detention and correctional fa-
Statistics DivisIon, National Criminal Justice cill!'J census of 1973: WashIngton, D.C.:
Information Md Statistics Service U.S. Government Printing Office, $lock
"Children In custody: Washington, D.C.: No. 027·000-0033-8.
U.S. Government Printing Office, Stock
No. S·45413-577.

Corrections - juvenile 59
Statistics Division, National Criminal Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Information and Statistics Service U.S. Department of Justice
·Chlldren In custody: Final report on the ju-
venile detention and correctional facility Juvenile detention and correctional
census of 1973." Washington, D.C.: U.S. facility census, 1975
C'lOvernment Printing Office.
(ICPSR 7707)

The stUdy was designed by the Bureau of


Justice Statistics and conducted by tlle
Bureau of Justice Statistics, United States Bureau of the Census. The cen-
U.S. Department of Justice sus Includes jwenlle detention and correc-
tional facilities that were operated by state or
Juvenile detention and correctional local governments In November, 1975, and
facility census, 1974 had been In operation at least a month prior
(ICPSR 7706) to June 30,1975. There are ~74l'ecords one
for each jwenlle detention or corractlonai fa-
The study was designed by the Bureau of cility. Each is classified into one of seven cate-
Justice Statistics and conducted by the gories: detention centers; shelters; reception
United States Bureau of the Census. The cen- or diagnostic centers; training schools:
sus Includes jwenile detention and correc- ri:lnches, forestry camps and farms; halfway
tional facilities that were operated by state or houses; and group homes. Data for 1974 in-
local governments In November, 1974, and clude: state, county, and city identification;
had been In operation at least a month prior number of admissions and discharges by
to June 30,1974. There are 829 records, one type and sex for the fiscal year 1975; annual
for each jwenile detention or correctional fa- resident population by detention status and
cility. Each is classified into one of eight cate- sex; number of residents adjudged delinquent
gories: detention centers: shelters' reception or declared In need of supervision by type of
or diagnostic centers; training sch~ols: offense and sex; average length of stay; num-
ranches, forestry camps and farms: halfway ~er of full- and part-time staff by type of posi-
houses: group homes; and non-residsntial tion and payroll status, and facility expendi-
community programs. Data for 1974 include: tures. Class II
state, county, and city identification' number
of admissions and discharges by tYpe and Related Publications:
sex for the fiscal yet.!. 1974; annual resident Statistics Division, National Criminal Justice
population by detention status and sex; num- Information and Statistics Service
ber of residents adjudged delinquent or de- "Children in custody: Advance report on
clared In need of supervision by type of of- the jwenlle detention and correctional fa-
fense and sex; average length of stay; cility census of 1975." Washington, D.C.:
num~er of full- and part-time staft by type of
U.S. Government Printing Office, Stock
position and payroll status and facility expen- No. 027-000-00599-3.
ditures. Class II Statistics Division, National Criminal Justice
Information and Statistics Service
Related Publications: ·Children in custody: Final report on the ju-
Statistics Division, National Criminal Justice venilo detention and correctional facility
Information and Statistics Service census of 1975." Washington, D.C.: U.S.
·Children In custody: Advance report on Government Printing Office.
the jwenile detention and correctional fa-
cility census of 1974." Wash!ngton, D.C.:
U.S. Government Printing Office, Stock
No. 027-000-00492-0. Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Statistics Division, National Criminal Justice U.S. Department of Justice
Information and Statistics Service
·Chlldren in custody: Final report on the ju- Survey of youths In custody, 1987:
venile detention and correctional facility [United States]
census of 1974." Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Government Printing Office. (ICPSR 8992)

Summary: This data collection is the first sur-


vey of youths confined to long-term state-op-
erated institutions and was undertaken to
complement existing Children in Custody cen-

60 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


suses. It also serves as a companion to the was conducted by the U.S. Bureau of the
SUrveys of Inmates of State Correctional Fa- Census. The variables Included are: type of
cilities, allowing comparisons between adult facility; level of government responsible for
and Juvenile populations. The survey provides administering the agency; number of admis-
detailed Information on the characteristics of sions by type of offense and sex; quarterly
those youths held primarily In secure settlngs resident population by detention statut'!'Jld
within the Juvenile Justice system. The data sex; number of residents adjudged dl:..:mquent
contain Information on criminal histories, de- or declared In need of supervision by offense
scriptions of family situations, drug and alco- and sex; facility capacity; statistics on the age
hol use, and peer group activities. For youths of residents by sex; average length of stay;
committed for violent acts, data are available number of full- and part-time staff; &idf vacan-
on the victims of ttnlr crimes and on weapon cies by type of position and payroll status,
use. Class II and facility expenditures. The 1977 survey
has 992 records In the data file, with 227 vari-
Universe: All youths In long-term state-oper- ables for each record. Comparable data were
ated Juvenile Institutional facilities. collected In 1971, 1973, 1974, and 1975.
Class II
Sampling: Stratified systematic rmdom sample.
Note: Several variables were blanked for rea-
sons of confidentiality, ICPSR makes the Chil-
dren In Custody census files aVallable under Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
the titles, Juvenile detention and correc- Prevention,
tional facility census, 1971 (lCPSR 7637), U.S. Department of Justice
1973 (ICPSR 7639), 1974 (ICPSR 7706),
1;375 (lCPSR 7707), 1977 (ICPSR 7758), Juvenile detention and correctional
1979 (ICPSR 7846), 1982·1983 (ICPSR facility census, 1979
8205), and 1984-1985 (ICPSR 8495). The (ICPSR 7846)
SUrveys of State Prisons are available under
the tit/es, Survey of inmates of state correc- The JUVenile Detention and CorrectIonal Faell-
tional facilities, 1974 (ICPSR 7811),1979 ity Census Is conducted biannually by the
(ICPSR 7856) and 1986 (lCPSR 8711). U.S. Bureau of the Census. In 1979, 1,015 fa-
cilities responded to the survey which asked
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- questions about expenditures, personnel, and
readable documentation + SPSS control resident populations. The data Include the
cards number of futt- and part-time staff, operating
and capital expenditures, physical size of fa-
OSIRIS and card image data formats, with cilities, number of admissions and types of of-
SPSS control cards for each fenses for resldentjuvenile popUlation, sex
and average age, detention status, and aver-
rectangular file structure age length of stay for committed Juveniles.
2,621 cases
The collection contains 238 variables for the
278 variables 1,015 facilities and has a logIcal record length
476-unit-long record of 716 characters. Class U
7 records per case

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency


Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention,
Prevention,
U.S. Department of Justice
U,S, Department of Justice
Juvenile detention and correctional
Juvenile detention and correctional
facllity census, 1977 facility census, 1982·1983
(ICPSR 8205)
(ICPSR 7758)

The Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facil- The Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facil-
iiy Census, 1982·1983 is the seventh In a se-
ity Census, 1977, is the fifth in a series of sur- ries of surveys conducted by the Bureau of
veys of state and loes! public residential facili-
the Census. It contalns information on state
ties in the juvenile justice systam. The census
and local public residential facilities which the

Corrections - juvenile 61
Juvenile Justice system operated during the fis- rectangular file structure
cal year 1982. The previous surveys covered 1,040 cases
the years 1972,1973,1974,1975,1977, and 279 variables
1979, and they are included in the ICPSR ar- 80-unlt-long record
chive. Each data record is classified into one 9 records per case
of six categories: (1) detention center; (2)
shelter; (3) reception or diagnostic center; (4)
tralning school; (5) ranch, forestry camp, or
farm; and (6) halfway house or group home.
Data Include state, county, and city identifica- Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
tion; level of government responsible for the Prevention,
facility; type of agency; agency Identification; U.S. Department of Justice
resident population by sex, age range, deten-
tion status, and offense; and admissions and Juvenile detention and correctional
departures of population. Also included in the facility census, 1986·1987: Public
data are average length of stay, staffing ex- facilities
penditures, capacity of the facility, and pro-
grams and services avallable. There are 369 (ICPSR 8973)
variables and 1,023 casas, one for each Juve-
nile detention or correctional facility. Class" Summary: The purpose of this data collection
Is to provide Information on the number and
type of juveniles placed In state and local resl·
dentlal facilities for juvenile offenders and to
facilitate the development of programs under
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency the Juvenile J:Jstice and Delinquency Preven-
Prevention and Bureau of Justice Statistics, tion Act of 1974. The collection augments in-
U.S. Department of Justice formation currently avallable on the adequacy
and needs of the nation's juvenile correctional
Juvenile detention and correctional system. Six types of public facilities are cov-
facility census, 1984·1985 ered: (1) detention centers, (2) shelters, (3) re-
ception or diagnostic centers, (4) tralnlng
(ICPSR 8495) schools, (5) ranches, forestry camps, and
farms, and (6) halfway houses and group
Summary~ This survey pfovldes information homes. Data a'I> provided in this collection on
on the characteristics and administration of ju- the number o!.· 'enlles held according to
venile detention and correctional facilities. Six age, sex, race.,::.thnlc origin, reason for cus-
types of facilities are covered: (1) detention tody, facility type, and number of staff and
centers, (2) shelters, (3) reception or diagnos- educational programs. Class IV
tic centers, (4) training schools, (5) ranches,
forestry camps, and farms, and (6) halfway Universe: All state-, county-, and city-oper-
houses and group homes. Survey items in- ated public juvenile facilities in the United
clude facility capacity, number of full-time and States. These Include residential programs
part-time staff, number of admissions and dis- and group homes that were (1) in operation
charges, average quarterly population, and on February 2,1987, (2) housed three or
expenditures by the facility. Data for facility more residents, at least 50 percent of whom
residents include age, sex, and average were juvenile, and (3) had accused or adjudi-
length of stay. Class II cated delinquents or status offenders making
up at least one percent of the dally population.
Universe: Residential facilities operated by
state and local governments as juvenile de- Extent of collection: 1 data file
tention and correctional facilities that were in
operation at the time the census was Initiated Logical record length data format
(February 1, 1984).
rectangular file struct:;re
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- 1,107 cases
readable documentation + SPSS control 600 variables
cards 6,32o-unit-long record
1 record per case
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with
SPSS control cards for each

62 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Universe: All state-, county-, and clty-oper-
Prevention, ated public juvenile facilities In the United
U.S. Department of Justice States. Nonresidential facilities, facllitles ex-
clusively for drug or alcohol abusers or non of-
Juvenile detention and correctional fenders, federal juvenile correctional facilities,
facility census, 198Q..1989: Public and juvenile facilities operated as part of adult
facilities Jails were excluded.

(ICPSR 9445) Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-


readable documentation
Summary: This survey provides Information
on the population and characteristics of public logical record length data format
juvenile detention and correctional facilities In
the United States. Population data Include In- rectangular file structure
formation on age, sex, type of offense, race, 1,100 cases
and reason for custody. Facilities data Include 514 variables
Information on type of facilltt, staffing, educa- 5,020-unlt-long record
tional and medical treatment programs, physi- 1 record per case
cal setting, security arrangements, and finan-
clalsupport and expenditures. Class IV

Corrections - juvenile 63
Court case processing
-
Bureau of Justice Statistics, California. Ohio, New York, and Pennsylva-
U.S. Department of Justice nia Using the Individual adult offender as the
unit for analysis, selected Information Is pro-
Offender based transaction statistics vided about the offender and his or her arrest,
(08TS), 1979: HawaII prosecution, and court disposition. Examples
of variables Included are: arrest and level of
(ICPSR 8042) arrest charge, date of arrest, charge filed by
the prosecutor, prosecutor or grand jury dispo-
Summary: This data collection was complied sition, type of counsel, type of trial, court dis-
In order to analyze, publish, and disseminate position, sentence type, and minimum and
statistical Information concerning the opera- maximum sentence length. Dates of disposi-
tion of the criminal justice system at the fed- tion of each stage of the process allow for
eral, state, and local levels. Facts are in- tracking of time spent at each stage. In cases
cluded for an arrested offender showing where the offender is charged with multiple of-
actions by the police, prosecutor, and court. fenses, the most serious charge and most se-
The individual offender is the unit of analysis, rious outcome at each stage of the process
and felony arrests and other related disposi- (from the offender's point of view} are pro-
tions are Inclooed. Class IV vided. Individual offenders are also given
unique Identification which is consistently
Universe: Population of adults charged with used when they are involved In subsequent
felonies In Hawaii. cases, Class II
Extent of collection: 1 data file Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
readable documentation + SPSS control
Logical record length data format cards
rectangular file structure logical record length data format w~h SPSS
4,253 cases control cards
49 variables
99-unlt-loog record rectangular file structure
1 record per case 360,676 cases
60 variables
152-unlt-long record
1 record per case
Bureau of JUstice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice
Offender based transaction statistics Bureau of Justice Statistics,
(08TS), 1980: California, Ohio, New U.S. Department of Justice
York, and Pennsylvania
Offender based transaction statistics
(ICPSR 824f3) (OBTS)J 1981: California JOhlof
Pennsylvania, Utah, Minnesota, New
Summary; the Offender Based Transaction
Statistics (OBTS) consist of data which allow York, and Virginia
examination of offender characteristics and (ICPSR 8277)
patterns of court action and case disposition.
Collected by individual states from existing Summary: The Offender Based Transaction
data. the dataset includes all cases which Statistics consist of data which allow examina-
reached disposition during the calendar year tion of offender characteristics and patterns of
1980. Data were collected and submitted by court action and case dispOSition. Collected

Court case processing 65


by Individual states from existing data, the da- of counsel, type of trial, sentence type, and
taset includes all cases which reached dispo- sentence length. Class II
sition during the calendar year 1981. Using
the Individual adult offender as the unit of Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
analysis, selected information is provided readable documentation + SPSS control
about the offender and his or her arrest, cards
prosecution, and court disposition. Examples
of variables included are: arrest and level of logical record length data format with SPSS
arrest charge, date of arrest, charge filed by control cards
the prosecution, prosecutor or grand Jury dis-
position, type of counsel, type of trial, court rectangular file structure
disposition, sentence typa, and minimum and 457,190 cases
maximum !lentence length. Dates of disposi- 60 variables
tion of each stage of the process allow for 152-unit-long record
tracking of time spent at each stage, in cases 1 record per case
where the offender is charged with muitlple of-
fenses the most serious charge and most seri-
ous outcome at each stage of the process
(from the offender's point of view) are pro-
vided. Class II Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- Offender based transaction statistics
readable documentation + SPSS control
cards (08TS), 1983: California, Minnesota,
Nebraska, New York, Ohio,
Logical record length data format with SPSS Pennsylvania, Utah, Virgin Islands,
control cards and Virginia
rectangular file structure (ICPSR 8449)
440,036 cases
60 variables Summary: This data collection offers statisti-
152-unit-long record cal information concerning the operation of
1 record per case the criminal Justice system at the federal,
state and local levels. The data provide se-
lected information on arrested offenders and
examine measures taken by the police, prose-
cutors, and courts to remove offenders from
Bureau of Justice Statistics, the arrest-prosecution process. The individual
U.S. Department of Justice adult offender Is the unit of analysis, and fel-
ony arrests and other related dispositions are
Offender based transaction statistics included. Class II
(08TS), 1982: California, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Utah, Minnesota, New Universe: Population of adults charged with
York, Virginia, Virgin Islands felonies in California, Minnesota, Nebraska,
New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, Virgin
(lCPSR 8408) Islands, and Virginia.
Summary: This Offender Based Transaction Extent of collection: 1 data fila + machine-
Statistics dataset is the third In a series of readable documentation + SPSS control
data collection efforts which allow examina- cards
tion of offender characteristics and patterns of
court action and court disposition. The first Logical record length data format with SPSS
data collection occurred In 1980 (lCPSR control cards
8248), and the second in 1981 (ICPSR 8277).
The 1982 data were collected in seven states rectangular file structure
and the Virgin Islands, and they include all 458,902 cases
cases which reached disposition during that 60 variables
year. The Individual offender is the unit of 152-unit-long record
analysis. Information is provided on arrest, po- 1 record per case
lice action, prosecutor action, level of
charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type

66 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Bureau of Justice Statistics, rectangular file structure
U.S. Department of Justice 531,896 cases
60 variables
OHender based transaction statistics 152·unlt·long record
(08TS), 1984: Alaska, California, 1 record per case
Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota,
Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, and Virginia
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
(ICPSR 8675) U.S. Department of Justice
Summary: 09TS is designed to coUect infor- Offender based transaction statistics
mation tracking adult offenders from the point (OBTS), 1985: Alaska, California,
of entry into the criminal justice system (typi. Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota,
cally by arrest), through final disposition, re- Missouri, Nebraska, New York,
gardless of whether the offender is convicted
or acquitted. Information is provided on ar- Pennsylvania, and Virginia
rest, police action, prosecutor actiPn, level of (ICPSR 8911)
charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type
of counsel, type of trial, sentence type, and Summary: 08TS Is designed to collect infor-
sentence length. This allows researchers to mation tracking adult offenders from the point
examine how the criminal justice system proc- of entry into the criminal Justice system (typi-
esses offenders, to measure the changing vol- cally by arrest) through final disposition, re-
ume of offenders moving through the different gardless of whether the offender is convicted
segments of the criminal justice system, to or acquitted. Information Is provided on ar-
calculate processing time Intervals between rest, police action, prosecuto," action, level of
major decision-making events, and to assess charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type
the changing structure of the offender popula- of counsel, pre-trial status. type of trial, sen-
tion. Overall, an assessment of the perform- tence type, and sentence length. This allows
ance of the adult criminal justice systems in researchers to examine how the criminal JUs-
the states included in this dataset can be tice system processes offenders, to measure
made. Class II the changing volume of offenders moving
through the different segments of the criminal
Universe: Persons In the United States who justice system, to calculate processing time In-
have achieved adult status (as specified by in- tervals between major decision-making
dividual state laws) and who have been proc- events and to assess the changing structure
essed for felonies by the police, prosecutors, of the ~ffender population. Class II
or courts whether or not there is a final deter-
mination of guilt. Universe: Persons in the United States who
have achieved adult status (as specified by In-
Note: The data contaln blanks within alphanu- dividual state laws) and who have been proc-
meric fields. essed for felonies by the police, prosecutors,
or courts whether or not there Is a final deter-
Restrictions: For certaln variables, the dat:=! mination of guilt.
have been masked by the ICPSR in order to
malntain the confidentiality of the respon- Note: The data contain blanks within alphanu-
dents. The original, unmasked data are avail- meric fields.
able from ICPSR. Requests for such data
must be submitted in writing, including spe- Restrictions: For certain variable:>, the data
cific reasons for the request. have been masked by the ICPSR In order to
malntain the confidentiality of the respon-
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine· dents. The original, unmasked data are avail-
readable documentation + SPSS control able from ICPSR. Requests for such data
cards must be submitted in writing, including spe-
clfio reasons for the request.
Logical record length data format with SPSS
control cards Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
readable documentation + SPSS control
cards

Court case processing 67


logical record length data format with SPSS Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
control cards readable documentation + SPSS control
cards
rectangular file structure
548,852 cases Logical record length data format with SPSS
60 variables control cards
152-unlt-long record
1 record per case rectangular file structure
587,237 cases
60 variables
152-unlt-long record
1 record per case
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice
Offender based transaction statistics
(08TS), 1986: Alabama, Alaska, Bureau of Justice Statistics,
California, Delaware, Georgia, U.S. Department of Justice
Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Offender based transaction statistics
York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia
(08TS), 1987: Alabama, Alaska,
(ICPSR 9130) California, Delaware, Georgia,
Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New
Summary: 08TS is designed to collect infor- Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Utah,
mation tracking adult offenders from the point Vermont, and Virginia
of entry into the criminal justice system (typi-
cally by arrest) through final disposition, re- (ICPSR 9287)
gardless of whether the offender is convicted
or acquitted. Information is provided on ar- Summary: 08TS is designed to collect infor-
rest, police action, prosecutor action, level of mation tracking adult offenders from the point
charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of entry Into the criminal justice system (typi-
of counsGl, pretrial status, type of trial, sen- cally by arrest) through final disposition, re-
tence type, and sentence length. This allows gardless of whether the offender Is convicted
researchers to examine how the criminal jus- or acquitted. Information is provided on ar-
tice system processes offenders, to measure rest, police action, prosecutor action, level of
the changing volume of offenders moving charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type
through the different segments of the criminal of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sen-
justice system, to calculate processing time in- tence type, and sentence length. These data
tervals between major decision-making allow researchers to examine how the crimi-
events, and to assess the changing structure nal Justice system processes offenders, to
of the offender population. Class II measure the changing volume of offenders
moving through the different segments of the
Universe: Legal adults who were processed criminal justice system, to calcuiate process-
for felonies by the criminal justice system dur- Ing time intervals between major decision-
Ing the year 1986 and whose cases reached making events, and to assess the changing
final disposition in 11 states: Alabama, structure of the offender population. Class II
Alaska, California, Delaware, Georgia, Minne-
sota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Pennsyl- Universe: Persons in the United States who
vania, and Virginia have achieved adult status (as specified by in-
dividual state laws) and who have been proc-
Note: The data contain blanks within alphanu- essed for felonies by the police, prosecutors,
meric fields. or courts whether or not there is a final deter-
mination of guilt.
Restrictions: For certain variabies, the data
have been masked by ICPSR in order to Note: The data contain blanks within alphanu-
maintain the confidentiality of the respon- meric fields.
dents. The original unmasked data are avail-
able from ICPSR. Requests for such data Restrictions: For certain variables, the data
must be submitted in writing, inciuding spe- have been masked by the ICPSR in order to
cific reasons for the request. maintain the confidentiality of respondents.
The original unmasked data are available
from ICPSR. Requests for such data must be

68 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


submitted in writing, Including specific rea- Abt Associates, Inc.
sons for the request.
Prosecution of felony arrests, 1982:
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- Portland, Oregon and WashIngton, DC
readable documentation + SPSS control
cards (ICPSR 8717)

logical record length data format with SPSS Summary: This study provides data on how
control cards prosecutors and the courts disposed of crimi-
nal cases Involving adults arrested for felony
rectangular file structure crimes in two Individual urban jurisdictions,
642,127 cases Portland, Oregon and Washington, D.C.
60 variables Cases in the data files were Initiated or filGd in
152-unlt-long record 1982. Both the Washington, D.C. file and the
1 record per case Portland file contaln Information on all let any
arrests (which Include arrests declined as
well as those filed), cases filed, and cases in-
dicted. Sentencing information Is provided In
the Portland file but Is not available for Wash-
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Ington D.C. Class IV
U.S. Department of Justice
Universe: All Information stored on aJurisdic-
State and local probation and parole tlon's manageml:lnt system for felony cases
systems, 1976 Initiated in 1982, cases initiated in 1981, and
cases initiated in the two or more years after
(ICPSR 7673) 1982.
This study Is a census of all state and local Note: For reasons of confidentiality, the pollee
probation and parole systems. it was con- department Identification number, the individ-
ducted In late 1976 by the United States Bu- ual's true name, and the circuit attorney's
reau of the Census for the Bureau of Justice manual case file number have been blanked.
Statistics. The data contain Information on This Is part of a larger three-part study.
each agency, Including: jurisdiction, funding
and operation, employment, and client Extent 01 collection: 2 data files
caseload. There are 93 variables for 3,587
agencies. Class II logical record length data format

Part 1
Washington, D.C.
Bureau of JUstice Statistics, rectangular file structure
U.S. Department of Justice 11,185 cases
18 variables
State and local prosecution and civil 1OS-unlt·long record
attorney systems, 1976 1 record per case
(ICPSR 7674) Part 2
Portland
The study is a census of all state and local rectangular file structure
prosecutors and civil attorney systems. The 6,146 cases
data Vlere collected in late 1976 by the U.S. 30 variables
Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Jus- 180-unlt-long record
tice Statistics. The study includes Information 1 record per case
concerning jurisdiction, funding and opera-
tion, employment, compensation, policies, Related Publications:
and number and type of employees. There Brosl, Kathleen
are 43 variables for 9,229 agencies. Class 11 "A cross-city comparison ollelony case
processing." Washington, D.C.: U.S. Gov-
ernment Printing Office, 1979.
Boland, Barbara and Elizabeth Brady
"The prosecution of felony arrests, 1980."
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Print-
Ing Office, 1985.

Court case processing 69


Boland, Barbara and Ronald Stones Boland. Barbara and Ronald Stones
"The prosecution of felony arrests, 1981." "The prosecution of felony arrests. 1981."
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government PrInt- Washington. D.C.: U.S. Government Print-
Ing Offics, 1986. Ing Office. 1986.

Abt Associates, Inc. Baldus. David 0 .• George Woodworth, and


Oharles A. Pulaski. Jr.
Prosecution of felony arrests, 1982:
St. Louis ChargIng and sentencing of murder
(ICPSR 8705) and voluntary manslaughter cases In
Georgia, 1973·1979
Summary: This data collection provides data (ICPSR 9264)
on how prosecutors and the courts disposed
of crIminal cases Involving adults arrested for Summary: These data were collected to as-
felony crimes In an Individual urban jurisdic- sess the levels of racial discrimination and ar-
tion st. Louis. The cases In the data file rep- bitrariness occurring at different levels within
res~t cases initiated in 1982, defined as Georgia's capital charging and sentencing
screened, or filed in 1982. The collection in- system. Data cover approximately 1.000 mur-
cludes disposition data on felonies for which der and voluntary manslaughter cases. Infor-
an initial court charge was filed (cases filed) mation was obtained for all known penalty
and for those felony arrests that were ulti- trial cases and for certain cases stratified by
mately Indicted or bound over to the felony case type (voluntary manslaughter conviction,
court for disposition (cases Indict). It does not nonpenalty trial life sentence, and penalty
Include Information on all felony arrests de- trial) and by state judicial circuit. Numerous
clined for prosecution. It Is, with a few excep- measures of defendant blameworthiness
tions, extracted from the defendant, case, were developed as a basis for assessing lev-
charge and sentence records. Class IV els of arbitrariness and discrimination In the
capital charging and sentencing system. Vari-
Universe: All information stored on ajurisdic- ables Include race, sex, and socioeconomic
tion's management system for felony cases class as well as crime codes. jurylbench deci-
initiated in 1S82, cases Initiated In 1981, and sions, final plea, term, and number of counts
for two or more years after 1982. convicted. Class IV
Note: For reasons of confidentiality, the police Universe: Defendants convicted of murder or
department Identification number (POlO), the voluntary manslaughtGr In Georgia between
Individual's true name (NAME), and the circuit March 1973 and December 1979.
attorney's manual case file number (CASE-
JACK) have been blanked. This is part of a Sampling: Stratified probability sample Includ-
larger three-part study. Ing all known sentence and penalty trial
cases.
Extent of coIl~tion: 1 data file
Note: Some data fields were blanked due to
Logical record length data format problems with confidentiality.
rect.'lOgular file structure Extent of collection: 1 data file
3,6"17 cases
30 variables Card image data format with SAS control
173-unlt-long record cards
1 record per case
rectangular file structure
Related Publications: 1.081 cases
Brosi, Kathleen 689 variables
"A cross-city comparison of felony case 80-unlt-long record
processing." Washington, D.C.: U.S. Gov- 48 records per case
ernment Printing Office, 1979.
Boland, Barbara and Elizabeth Brady
"The prosecution of felony arrests, 1980."
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Print-
Ing Office, 1985.

70 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Related Publications: Related Publications:
Baldus, D., G. Woodworth, and C. Pulaski Baldus, D., G. Woodworth, and C. Pulaski
EC1Jal Justice and the d£1ath penalty: A legal EC1Jal Justice 3fld the death penalty: A legal
and errplrlcal analysis. Boston, MA: North- and empirical analysis. Boston, MA: North-
eastern University Press, 1990 (in press). eastern University Press, 1990 (In press).
Baldus, D., G. Woodworth, and C. Pulaski Baldus, D., G. Woodworth, and C. Pulaski
"Law and statistics in conflict: Reflections "Comparative review of death sentences:
on Mccleskey v. Kemp: In D. Kagehlro An empirical study of the Georgia experi-
and W. Laufer (eds.), Handbook on Psy- ence.· Journal of Criminal Law and Crimi-
chology and Law, 1990 (In press). nology 24 (1983), 661.
Woodworth, G. Baldus, D., G. Woodworth, and C. Pulaski
"Analysis of a y-stratified sample: The "Arbitrariness and discrimination in the ad-
Georgia charging and sentencing study: ministration of the death penalty: A chal-
In Proceedings of the Second Workshop lenge to state supreme courts: Stetson
on Law and Justice Statistics. Bureau of Law Review 15 (1986), 133.
Justice Statistics, 1983.

Boland, Barbara
Baldus, David C., George Woodworth, and
Charles A. Pulaski, Jr. Prosecution of felony arrests, 1986:
Indianapolis, Los Angeles, New
Procedural reform of jury murder Orleans, Portland, 5t. Louis, and
convictions In Georgia, 1970-1978 Washington, DC
(ICPSR 9265) (iCPSR 9094)
Summary: The purpose of this data collection Summary: This data collection represents the
was to assess the Impact of the 1973 reforms sixth In a series of statistical reports spon-
of the death penalty laws on the levels of arbi- sored by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The
trariness and discrimination In capital sentenc- purpose of the series is to provide statistical
Ing In Georgia The data cover two different Information on how prosecutors and the
periods corresponding to the periods before courts dispose of criminal cases involving
and after the reform: 1970-1972 and 1973- adults arrested for falony crimes. The 1986 re-
1978. Numerous measures of defendant port provides data on cases that originated as
blameworthiness were developed as a basis felony arrests and were disposed In 1986 for
for assessing levels of arbitrariness and dis- these six jurisdictions; SI. Louis, MO, Wash-
crimination In Georgia's capital charging and Ington, DC, Portland, OR, Indianapolis, IN,
sentencin{1 system. Specific variables Include Los Angeles, CA, and New Orleans, LA.
race, sex, current offense, prior conviction Class II
and arrests, method of killing, and number of
victims. Class IV Universe: All felony arrests disposed In 1986
in Indianapolis, Los Angeles, New Orleans,
Urjverse: All defendmts convicted of murder at Portland. St. Louis. and Washington. DC.
trial during 1973-1978, and for 1970-1972 all
death cases plus life-sentence cases that re- Ext~nt of collection: 6 data files + machine-
sUted in a murder trial conviction in Georgia readable documentation + SPSS control
cards
Sampling: Nonprobabllity sample for 1970-
1972 and all cases (death and life sentence) Card Image data format
convicted of murder at trial from 197310 1978.
Part 1
Extent of collection: 1 data file Indhmapolis
rectangular file structure
Card image data format with SAS control 3,579 cases
cards 31 variables
80-unlt-long record
rectangular file structure 1 record per case
762 cases
160 variables
80-unlt-long record
31 record per case

Court case processing 71


Part 2 formation about prosecutors' dlscretlonary
los Angeles judgments on sampled cases was obtained
rectangular file structure from Interviews of prosecutors and case re-
50,491 cases view forms completed by attorneys. Respon-
31 variables dent and nonrespondent flies, taken from offi-
80-unit-long record cial court records, contain Information on
1 record per case current and past records of offenses commit-
ted, arrests, dispositions, sentences, parole
Part 3 and probation histories, SUbstance abuse re-
New Orleans cords, Juvenile court appearances, criminal
rectangular file structure justice practitioners' assessments, and demo-
3,957 cases graphic characteristics. The prosecutor inter-
25 variables view files contain variables relating to prose-
80-unlt-long record cutors' opinions on the seriousness of the
1 record per case defendant's case, subjective criteria used to
decide suitability for prosecution, and case
Part 4 status at intake stage. Information obtained
Portland from prosecutors' case review forms include
rectangular file structure defendants' prior records and situatlonal vari-
6,583 cases ables related to the charged offenses. The
18 variables self-report files contain data on the defen-
80-unit-long record dants' employment histories, substance
1 record per case abuse and criminal records, sentence and
confinement histories, and basic socioeco-
PartS nomic characteristics. Class IV
St.louis
rectangular file structure Universe: All males prosecuted in los Ange-
4,050 cases les County and Middlesex County for bur-
31 variables glary, homicide, and robbery between 1984
80-unlt-long record and 1986.
1 record per case
Sampling: The sample was a random subset
Part 6 of male priority prosecuted defendants not
Washington, DC prosecuted as career criminals but originally
rectangular file structure charged with such crimes as homicide, bur-
14,694 cases glary, and robbery.
27 variables
80-unlt-long record Note: In the seli'-report surveys of defendants,
1 record per case multiple indicators were included to assess re··
liability of responses. Data on Los Angeles
nonrespondents were also collected to exam-
Ine the possible response bias.
Chaiken, Marcia R.
Extent of collection: 9 data files
Selecting career criminals for priority
prosecution, 1984-1986: Los Angeles Card Image data format
County, California and Middlesex Part 1
County, Massachusetts Respondents: los Angeles County 1
(ICPSR 8980) rectangular file structure
84 cases
This study was sponsored by the United States 416 variables
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- 80-unit-long record
tice. The grant number is B4-IJ-CX-0055. 53 records per case

Summary: Collection of these data was under- Part 2


taken in order to develop offender classifica- Nonrespondents: los Angeles County 1
tion criteria that could be used to identify rectangular file structure
career criminals fer priority prosecution. In ad- 1 case
dition to the crime records obtained from offi- 416 variables
cial sources and defendents' self-reports, in- 80-unit-long record
53 records per case

72 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 3 Champagne, Anthony S. and Stuart S.
R9spondents: Los Angeles County 2 Nagel
rectangular file structure
200 cases Legal service agencies, 1970
399 variables
80-unlt-long-record (ICPSR 7369)
51 records per case
These data, collected by the CllIce of Legal
Part 4 Services under the Off/ce of Economic Oppor-
Nonrespondents: Los Angeles County 2 tunity. concern the effectiveness of legal serv-
rectangular file structure Ice programs. The data Include Information
26 cases about each a~ency, Its budget, and the char-
399 variables acteristics of its clients and personnel. Evalu-
SO-unlt·long record ations of the agencies' effectiveness and op-
51 records per case eration wore made by a visiting observer
based on consultations with staff and commu-
PartS nity members. Evaluative measures Include
Respondents: Middlesex County community attitudes, agency resources, and
rectangular file structure staff competence. The dataset contains 175
190 cases variables on 197 agencies. Class II
391 variables
80-unlt-/ong record Related Publications:
51 records per case Champagne, Anthony S.
Causes of legal services effectiveness.
Part 6 Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications (Se-
Prosecutors: Los Angeles County ries In Administration and Policy Studies),
rectangular file structure 1975.
29B cases Nagel, Stuart S.
7 variables "A graphic look at the legal servIces pro-
80-unlt-long record gram: Frontiers of EconomIcs 1:118-124,
1 record per case 1975.

Part 7
Prosecutors: Middlesex County
rectangular file structure Clarke, Stevens H.
181 cases
48 variables Alaska plea bargaining study I
SO-unlt-Iong record 1974-1976
6 records per case
(lOPSR 7714)
PartB
Self response: Los Angeles County This study examines the characteristics of
rectangular file structure criminal offenders as they affect the primary
29B cases outcomes of their court cases, particularly
377 variables plea bargaining decisIons. The study was con-
BO-unlt-Iong record ducted In Anchorage, Juneau, and Fairbanks,
10 records per case Alaska. over a two-year period from August
1974 to August 1976. The data were col-
Part 9 lected from poHce booking sheets, public fin-
Self response: Middlesex County gerprint files, and court dockets, The unit of
rectangular file structure observation Is the telony case, I.e., a single
202 cases felony charge against a single defendant.
377 variables Each unIt of data contaIns Information about
BO-unlt-Iong record both the detendant and the charge. There are
10 records per case 3,586 cases. The approxImately 200 vari·
abies include demographic and social charac-
Related Publication: teristics of the offender, criminal history ot the
Chalken, Marcia R. and Jan M. Chalken offender, nature ot the offense, evidence, vic-
"Selecting career criminals for priority tim characteristics, and administrative factors
prosecution." Unpublished final report sub- related to the disposition of the case. Class 11
mitted to the National Institute of Justice,
1987.

Court case processing 73


Clarke, Stevens H. summary: This data collection was designed
to evaluate the Client Specific Planning
Felony prosecution and sentencing In (CSP) program of the National Center on In-
North Carolina, 1981·1982 stitu'Jons and Alternatives (NCIA). The CSP
program offers nonlncarceratlve sentencing
(ICPSR B307) options and alternatives prepared for Judges
and presented by an NCIA caseworka-. The
Ttis study was sponsored by the United States study measures thalmpact of the program on
DepMment of Justice, Nation~ Inst~ute of Jus- sentence length, sentence severity, the effec-
dce. The grMt number is 8O-IJ·CX-0004. tiveness of the program at diverting serious
felony offenders from Incarceration, and the
Summary: Thl~ research wac designed to as- rate, type, seriOUsness, and timing of recidi-
sess the impact of a determinant sentencing vism In a 24-month post-sentence risk period.
leN, the Fair Sentencing Act, whIch became Variables are provided for each defendant on
effectiVe July 1, 1981 in North Carolina. State- demographic characteristics, criminal history,
wide data from tWelve counties were col- prior counseling experiences, prior Incarcera-
lected on felony prosecution and sentencing tion, charges and dispositions of the recidivist
frvm police depal1ments, arrest reports, po- arrests, and types of sentencing alternatives
lice investigation reports, and District and SUo recommended In the CSP program. Class IV
perie!' Court files during a three-month period
in 1979 and again in 1981. The 12 counties Extent of collection: 1 data file
reflect a purposive sample of North Carolina
counties and were selected on the basis of re- Card image data format
gion, urbanization, and workload of the court.
Variables In the cIa.taset Include Information rectangular file structure
from official court records on witness testi- 258 cases
mony and quality of evidence, Information 436 variables
from prison staff and probation/parole offi- 80-unlt-long record
cers, and social, demographiC, and criminal 15 records per case
history data for defendants. In this dataset It
is possible to trace defendants through the Related Publication:
criminal Justice system from arrest to disposi- Clements, William H.
tion. The data inclUde Information on the de- "The effectiveness of client specific plan·
fendant's entry point In the system, charge ning as an alternative sentence." Unpub·
and charge reduetion information, arraign- lished Ph.D dissertation, University of
ment status, and mode and type of disposi- Delaware, 1987.
tion. There is a total of four files, two data files
and two containing SAS control cards. Each
case In the 1979 and the 1981 data flies rep-
resents data on an individual defendant.
There are 279 variables for 1,378 cases in CunnHf, Mark A.
the 1979 data file and 322 variables for 1,280
cases in the 1981 data file. Both data files Penal code citations: sentencing In 18
have logical record lengths of 80 characters. American felony courts, 1983-1984
Class IV (ICPSR 8396)

Summary: Data for this study concerning fel·


ony court sentencing practices were collected
Clements, William H. from 18 jurisdictions in 15 states. The data
collection was sponsored by the U.S. Depart-
Effectiveness of client specific ment of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics
planning as an alternative sentence, (BJS). The jurisdictions consisted of cities
1981-1982: Washington, D.C. and and counties with an average population of
Fairfax, Montgomery, and Prince 886,000 persons, making them repre-
George counties sentative of urban and densely populated sub-
urban areas. Among jurisdictions, the sen-
(ICPSR 8943) tencing schemes available to the judiciary
varied; both determinate and indeterminate
Ttis study was sponsored by the United States sentencing practices are represented in the
Department of Justice, National Inst~ute of Jus- sample. The variables include information
tice. The grant number Is 85-IJ·CX-0047. about the criminal charges, nature of convic-
tions, sentences imposed, terms and location

74 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


of prison sentences, and the age of persons Part 7
sentenced. The elata are arranged by Jurisdic- Jurisdiction 8
tion Into 18 files, each consisting of 20 vari- rectangular file structure
ables with logical record lengths of 80 charac- 945 cases
ters. The number of records per file varies 24 variables
from 146 to 1,384 with an average of 830 re- 80-unlt·long record
cords. Class II 1 record per case

Extent of collection: 19 data fitgs + machine- Part 8


readable documentation + SPSS control Jurisdiction 9
cards rectangular file structure
610 cases
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with 24 variables
SPSS control cards tor each BO-unit-long record
1 record per case
Part 1
Jurisdiction 1 Part 9
rectangular file structure Jurisdiction 10
731 cases rectangular file structure
24 variables 330 cases
80-unlt-long record 24 variables
1 record per case 80-unit-long record
1 record per case
Part 2
Jurisdiction 2 Part 10
rectangular file structure Jurisdiction 11
509 cases rectangular fila structure
24 variables 146 cases
SO-unit-long record 24 variables
1 record per case SO-unit-long record
1 record per case
Part 3
Jurisdiction 4 Part 11
rectangular file structure Jurisdiction 12
1.282 cases rectangular file structure
24 variables 1,284 cases
80-unlt-long record 24 variables
1 record par case SO-unlt-Iong record
1 record per case
Part 4
Jurisdiction 5 Part 12
rectanQular file structure Jurisdiction 13
964 cases rectangular file structure
24 variables 471 cases
80-unlt-long record 24 variables
1 record per case BO-unlt-Iong record
1 record per case
PartS
Jurisdiction 6 Part 13
rectangular file structure Jurisdiction 14
697 cases rectangular file structure
24 variables 1,162 cases
80-unlt-long record 24 variables
1 record per case 80-unlt-long record
1 record per case
Part 6
Jurisdiction 7
rectangular file structure
B34cases
24 variables
80-unlt-long record
1 record per case

Court case processing 75


Part 14 lish a statistical series on sentencing out-
Jurisdiction 15 comes In felony courts throughout the United
rectangular file structure States. The Jurisdictions consist of cities and
1,002 cases counties with an average popUlation of 1.1
24 variables million persons. Among the Jurisdic~ons the
Bo-unlt-Iong record sentencing schemes available varied, with
1 record per case both determinate and Indeterminate sentenc-
Ing practices In operation. The study distin-
Part 15 guishes between core Informational Items
Jurisdiction 17 such as the criminal charges, the type of SP'1-
rectangular file structure tence Imposed and the terms of the prison
BOO cases sentence, and optional Items such as the
24 variables characteristics of the offense, case process-
BO-unit-Iong record Ing, and the defendant. Class IV
1 record per case
Universe: Twenty-eight jurisdictions with popu-
Part 16 lations ranging from 294,000 to 7,900,000.
Jurisdiction 18
rectangular file structure Sampling: All sentences meted out In courts
1,204 cases of general jUrisdictions for 7 felony offenses.
24 variables Sampling was low for homicide and rape but
BO-unlt-Iong record higher for burglary, larceny and drug traffiqk-
1 record per case Ing. The cases are weighted by the inverse of
their sampling ratio with 23,389 records ad-
Part 17 justed to represent 71,231 weighted records.
Jurisdiction 19
rectangular file structure Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
871 cases readable documentation + SPSS control
24 variables cards
80-unlt-long record
1 record per case OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with
SPSS control cards for each
Part 18
Jurisdiction 20 rectangular file structure
rectangular file structure 23,389 cases
934 cases 28 variables
24 variables 130-unit-long record
80-unlt-long record 2 records per case
1 record per case

Part 19
All jurisdictions
rectangular file structure Cunnnf, Mark A. and The National
14,876 cases Association of Criminal Justice Planners
24 variables A sentencing postscript: Felony
80-unlt-long record
1 record per case probationers under supervision In the
community, 1983
(ICPSR 8647)

Cunnnf, Mark A. Summary: This study provides an overview of


how the supervision of a class of felony proba-
Sentencing outcomes in 28 felony tioners Is operating as a whole In a jurisdic-
courts, 1985 [United States] tion, and gives a baseline against which the
Impacts of change to probationary supervi-
(ICPSR 8708) sion can be measured. The objectives of this
study are to describe the demographic char-
Summary: The purposes of this study are to acteristics c! probationers, the nature and
describe sentencing outcomes in felony level of supervision that probationers receive,
courts for selected serious offenses-homi- the extent and types of specified conditions
cide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, bur- Imposed on probationers, the degree of pro-
glary, larceny and drug trafficking-and estab-

76 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


batloner compliance with these speclfled con- National Association of Criminal Justice
ditions, the extent to which probationers are Planners
arrested and/or subjected to probationary dis- "The scales of Justice: Sentencing out-
ciplinary hearings while under supervision, comes in 18 felony courts." Washington,
and the exit status of probationers from com- D.C.: National Association of Criminal Jus-
munity supervision. Class I tice Planners, 1984.

Universe: Convicted adult felons sentenced


to probation for the crimes of homicide, rape,
robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, lar- Feeney, Floyd
ceny, and drug trafficking.
Arrests without conviction: How often
Sampling: Sampling rates varied by type of they occur and why, 1979·1980:
crime and Jurisdiction, with the desired goal of
30 cases for each type of crime In each of the Jacksonville and San Diego
jurisdictions. (ICPSR 8180)
Extent of collection: 4 data files + machine- ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
readable documentation + SPSS control Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
cards tice. The grant number Is 78-NI·AX·0116.
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with Summary: This data collection Includes infor-
SPSS control cards for each mation on robberies and burglaries In two cit-
Ies, JacksonvlUe, Florida and San Diego, Cali-
Part 1 fornia. The unit of analysis Is defendants of
Probation hearings and new arrests felony cases. There are five tiles In the data
rectangular file structure set: Jacksonville robberies, (N=200); San Di-
1,601 cases ego robberies, (N=200); San Diego burgla-
34 variables ries, (N=219); Jacksonville burglaries 1,
1OS-unlt-Iong record (N=200); and Jacksonville burglaries 2,
2 records per case (N=200). The Jacksonville burglaries are di-
vided into two separate files which, after
Part 2 merging, form the complete data set. Informa-
Financial conditions tion on each defendant Includes demograph-
rectangular file structure Ics, socioeconomic status, criminal history,
1,161 cases weapon usage, relationship to victim, trial pro-
35 variables cedures, and disposition. The logical record
58-un1t-long record length of each file varies: Jacksonville robber-
1 record per case Ies, 1,355; San Diego robberies, 1,392; San
Diego burglaries, 1,332; Jacksonville burgla-
Part 3 ries 1,660; and Jacksonville burglaries 2,915.
Behavioral conditions Class IV
rectangular file structure
1,024 cases
21 variables
34-unit-long record
1 record per case Forst, Brian and William Rhodes
SentenCing In eight United States
Part 4
Master file on probation district courts, 1973·1979
rectangular file structure (ICPSR 8622)
2,648 cases
26 variables This study was sponsored by the United
47-unlt-long record States Department of Justice! Natlonallnsti-
1 record per case tute of Justice. The grant number Is J-42723.
Related Publications: Summary: This data collection provides Infor-
Bureau of Justice Statistics mation about sentencing patterns established
"Report to the nation on crime and justice: by the United States District Courts for fed-
The data" Washington, D.C.: U.S. Depart- eral offenses. Eleven types crime were In-
ment of Justice, 1983. cluded: bank robbery, embezzlement, Income

Court case processing 77


taX, mall theft, forgery, drugs, random other, Part 4
false claims, homicide, bribery of a public offi- PSI: Forgery
cial, and mall fraud. There are three kinds of rectangular file structure
data files which pertain to the eleven types of 751 cases
crimes: psi files, offense files, and AO files. 187 variables
The psi files describe defendant demographic 326-unit·long record
background and criminal history. The offense 1 record per case
files contain questions tailored to a particular
type of offense committed by a defendant and PartS
the results of conviction and sentencing. The PSI: Mail theft
AO files provide additional Information on de- rectangular file structure
fendants' background characteristics, court re- 154 cases
cords, and dates of court entry and exit. this 187 variables
collection Is one of only a few studies that has 326-unlt-long record
examined federal sentencing patterns, court 1 record per case
Involvement, sentencing, and criminal histo-
ries. Class IV Part 6
PSI: Narcotics
Universe: All defendants sentenced in Fed- rectangular file structure
eral District Courts from 1973-1978 for 11 se- 726 cases
lected offenses. 187 variables
326-unit-long record
Sampling: The eight districts were selected to 1 record per case
represent some degree of geographic spread
and variation In size. The most recent 120 Part 7
presentence Investigation reports per offense PSI: Income tax
from each of the five largest districts Were se- rectangular file structure
lected and the most recent 40 pre-sentence 636 cases
investigation reports were chosen. 187 variables
326-unit-long record
Note: Certain variables have been blanked 1 record per case
for reasons of confidentiality.
PartS
Extent of collection: 27 data files + SPSS con- PSI: Bribery
trol cards rectangular file structure
602 cases
logical record length data format with SPSS 187 variables
control cards 326-unit-long record
1 record per case
Part 1
PSI: Bank embezzlement Part 9
rectangular file structure PSI: False claims
561 cases rectangular file structure
187 variables 573 cases
326-unit-long record 187 variables
1 record per case 326-unit-long record
1 record per case
Part 2
PSI: Bank robbery Part 10
rectangular file structure PSI: Homicide
723 cases rectangular file structure
187 variables 578 cases
326-unit-long record 187 variables
1 record per case 326-unit-long record
1 record per case
Part 3
PSI: Random other
rectangular file structure
681 cases
187 variables
326-unlt-long record
1 record per case

78 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 11 Part 18
PSI: Mail fraud Offense: Narcotics
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
499 cases 726 cases
187 variables 74 variables
326-unlt-long record 376-unlt-Iong record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 12 Part 19
Offense: Bank embezzlement Offense: Income tax
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
561 cases 636 cases
94 variables 93 variables
378-unlt-long record 401-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 13 Part 20
Offense: Bank robbery Offense: Bribery
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
723 cases 602 cases
86 variables '75 variables
409-unlt-long record 326-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 14 Part 21
Offense: Random other Offense: False claims
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
751 cases 573 cases
85 variables 79 variables
494-unit-long record 326-unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 15 Part 22
Offense: Forgery Offense: Homicide
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
751 cases 578 cases
85 variables 115 variables
386-unit·long record 443-unlt-long record
'I record per case 1 record per case

Part 16 Part 23
Offense: Mail theft Offense: Add l'Iarcotics
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
154 cases 737 cases
74 variables 6 variables
376-unit-long record 15-unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 17 Part 24
Offense: Mail fraud AO: Combined
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
480 cases 4,728 cases
72 variables 28 variables
388-unit·long record as-unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

GOUlt case processing 79


Part 25 selected from the Philadelphia Municipal
AO: Bribery Court. Eight judges were randomly selected
rectangular file structure to use guidelines or be "experimental judges";
776 cases and eight were randomly selected to be
28 variables nonguldellnes or "control judges." Data were
86-unit-long record taken from defendant's files and include num-
1 record per case ber of suspects involved, number of different
offenses charged, most serious Injury experi-
Part 26 enced by the victlm(s), preliminary arraign-
AO: Homicide ment disposition, amount of ball, socioeco-
rectangular file structure nomic status and demographics of the
863 cases defendant, prior criminal history, and reason
28 variables for granting or denying ball. There are two
86-unit-long record files In this data collection. The first contains
1 record per case SPSS control cards and the second contains
data for the 1,920 cases; each case has 10
Part 27 records of data 80th files have logical record
AO: False claims lengths of 80 characters. Class IV
rectangular file structure
744 cases
28 variables
86-unit-long record
1 record per case Hindus, Michael S.
Slave trials In Anderson and
Related Publications: Spartanburg counties, South Carolina,
Bartolomeo, John
"Judicial reactions to sentencing guide- 1818-1861
lines." Washington, D.C.: Department of (iCPSR 8674)
Justice, 1981.
Bartolomeo, John, et aI. Summary: This dataset is part of a larger data
"Sentencing decision making: The logic of collection effort conducted by the principal in-
sentence decisions and the extent and vestigator to study crime, justice, and penal
sources of sentence decisions." Washing- reform in Massachusetts and South Caroline.
ton, D.C.: Department of Justice, 1981. from 1760 to 1880. Data are presented in this
Campbell, Davidson, Janet McKernan, and file on over 600 slave trials in two counties of
Mary laing-McKernan ante-bellum South Carolina from 1818-1861.
"Data documentation for the analysis of The data were obtained from the Anderson
federal sentencing decisions." Washing- and Spartanburg counties surviving public re-
ton, D.C.: Institute for Law and Social Re- cords of the Courts of Magistrates and Free-
search, 1980. holders. Included are variables documenting
the accused crime, verdict, punishment, and
item stoien (if applicable), as well as the de-
fendent's name, sex, status, owner, and date
Goldkarrp, John S. and Michael R. of the trial. Class IV
Gottfredson
Universe: Male and female slaves tried for ac-
Judicial decision guidelines for ball: cused crimes in Spartanburg and Anderson
The Philadelphia experiment, counties, South Carolina.
1981-1982
Note: The data contaln blanks.
(ICPSR 8358)
Extent of collection: 1 data file
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
Depcrtnent of Justice, National Institute of Jus- Card image data format
tice. The gr~t number is 81-IJR-0027.
rectangular file structure
Summary: The purpose of this study was to 1,086 cases
test the utility of a first version of ball guide- 16 variables
lines. An experimental research approach 80-unit-long record
was selected. A sample of judges, based 1 record per case
upon a stratified quota sampling design, were

80 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Instttute for Law and Social Research, Inc. slve volumes of cases and the assembly line
fragmentation at responsibility and control
Prosecutors management and has created a situation where one case Is in-
Information system (PROMIS) data, distinguishable from another and where the
Washington D.C., 1974-1975 effects of problems at various points or
stages In the assembly line on ultimate case
(ICPSR 7643) disposition go undetected and uncorrected.
One unique feature of PROMIS which ad-
These data were generated by the operation dresses these problems is the automated
of the Prosecutors Management Information evaluation of cases. Through the application
System and contain Information on all cases of a uniform set of criteria, PROMIS, assigns
and defendants brought to the Superior Court two numerical ratings to each case: one signi-
Division of the United States Attorney's Office fying the gravity of the crime through a meas-
for the District of Columbia. The data were urement of the amount of harm done to soci-
prepared for public release by the Institute for ety, and the other signifying the gravity of the
Law and Social Research, Washington, D.C. prior criminal record of the accused. These
The data collection effort was sponsored by ratings make it possible to select the mere Im-
the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of portant cases for Intensive, pre-trial prepara-
Justice Statistics (BJS). The dataset contains tion and to assure even-handed treatment of
selected variables Including type and gravity cases ot like gravity. A complementary feature
of the crime, a score reflecting the defen- of PROMIS Is the automation of reasons for
dant's past criminal record, and detailed Infor- decisions made or actions taken along the as-
mation of the administration of each case. sembly line. Reasons for dismissing cases
The 1974 data Include only sentencing infor- prior to trial on their merits can be related to
mat!on. The 1974 dataset contains 295 vari- earlier cycles of postponements for various
ables for 17,534 cases and the 1975 data reasons and to the reasoning behind intake
have 293 variables for 18,893 cases. Class II and screening decisions. The PROMIS >!s-
tasel also Includes information about the de-
fendant; case characteristics and processes;
charge, sentencing and continuance proc-
Institute for Law and Social Research, Inc. esses; and the witnesseslvictfms involved
with a case. PROMIS was lirst used in 1971
Prosecutors management and In the U.S. Attorney's Office fer the District of
Information system (PROMIS), Columbia. To enhance the ability to transfer
New Orleans, 1979 the PROMiS concepts and software to other
communities, LEAA. awarded a grant to the
(ICPSR 8219) Institute for Law and Social Research
(INSLAW) In Washington. D.C.
Prosecutors management and
Information system (PROMIS), The New Orleans PROM IS dataset is one
product of this grant. The New Orleans
Rhode Island, 1979
PROMIS dataset Is organized In a hierarchi-
(ICPSR 8288) cal data structure with over 88,000 records
and a total of six records per case. Each re-
Prosecutors management and cord Includes data about a particular aspect
Information system (PROMIS), of a case including data about the (1) defen-
dant (about 12 variables): (2) case (about 72
st. LOUis, 1979 variables); (3) charges (about 26 variables);
(ICPSR 8225) (4) sentencing (about 18 variables); (5) con-
tinuances (about 16 -variables): and (6) wit-
The Prosecutor's Management and Informa- nessesNlctims (about 18 variables).
tion System (PROMIS) is a computer-based
management Information system for public The St. Louis and Rhode Island data structures
prosecution agencies. PROMIS was initially also are organized Into hierarchical data struc-
developed with funds from the U.S. Depart- tures and have over 109,000 and 98,000 re-
ment of Justice, Bureau of JUstice Statistics cords, respectively. There are six records p~
(BJS) to cope with the problems of a large, ur- case, Each record Includes data about a par-
ban prosecution agency where mass produc- ticular aspect of a case Inc1udl~ data about
tion operations have superseded the tradi- the (1) defendant (14 variables for Rhode Is-
tional practice of a single attorney preparing land; 16 variables for St. louis): (2) case (about
and prosecuting a given case from Inception 131 variables for Rhode Island; 80 variables for
to final disposition. The combination of mas- St. Louis); (3) charges (about 32 variables for

Court case processing 81


Rhode Island and St. louis): (4) sentencing abies for 320 cases In the Defendant Rle,
(oooot 24 variables for Rhode Island and St. 153 variables for 353 cases in the Victim File,
louis); (5) contlruMce (about 27 va-iables and 95 variables for 431 cases in the Police
for Rhode IslMd; 21 for St. Louis); and (6) wit- Rle. class"
nesslvlctlms (about 17 va-iables for Rhode Is-
Iar1d; 15 for St. Louis). The data for both col-
lections a-e va-looly b1ooked. Class "
Krttzer, Herbert M., David M. Trubek,
William L.F. Felstlner, Joel B. Grossman,
and AUstin Sarat
Kerstetter, Wayne A.
Civil litigation In the United States,
Evaluation of pretrial settlement
19n·1979
conference, Dade County, Florida,
criminal court, 1979 (ICPSR 7994)
(ICPSR 7710) ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States tice. The gr;;nt number is 82-IJ-CX-0003.
Depa1rnent of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The gr;;nt number Is 76·NI-99-0088. Summary: The Civil Utlgation Research Pro-
ject, based at the University of Wisconsin
Summary: This study reports on the imple- Law Schooi, was organized in 1979. The ma-
mentation of a proposal to involve, on a volun- jor goals of the project were the development
tary basis, victims, defendants, and police in of a large database on dispute processing
judicial plea negotiation conferences In Dade and litigation and the collection of information
County, Florida. Parts 1-3 (Defendants, Vic- on the costs of civil litigation. Data were gath-
tims and Police Flies) consist of question- ered on such topics as negotiation proceed-
naires given to victims, defendants, and po- ings, relationship between the lawyer and the
lice. The questionnaires, administered during client, and organizations' influence on the out-
20-minute Interviews, were conducted after come of a dispute. Class IV
the case had been completed. The interview
instruments were designed to collect data on Note: Documentation for this collection is ma-
three major issues: first, the extent to which chine-readable only. The unit of analysis Is
respondents reported participation In the proc- the "dispute" or "case". The data collection
essing of their ce.3es; second, respondents' consists of five files, the first two of which are
knowledge of ihe way their cases were proc- hierarchical and variably blocked and the last
essed; and third, respondents' views of crimi- three of which are rectangular. In Part 1,
nal Justice system. Part 4 is a Conference Ob- there are 75,996 records generated from data
servation File. During the pretrial settlement gathered on approximately 4,050 disputes.
conference, an observer wrote In sequence The number of records per case varies de-
as much as possible of the verbal behavior. pending upon the characteristics of the dis-
After the session the observer made some pute. There are 40 possible record types that
subjective ratings, provided descriptive data may describe a dispute. Examples Include (1)
about the conclusion of the session, and clas- "institutional" records, which record the basic
sified comments Into one of the eight substan- events that transpired during a case, (2) "ap-
tive categories: (1) F~ts of the Case, (2) Prior peals" records, whiQh document the events
Record, (3) Law and Practices, (4) Maximum surrounding the ap.udal of a case and (3) the
Sentence, (5) Prediction of Trial Outcome, (6) "relations with opponent" records, which pro-
Conference Precedent, (7) Personal Back- vide data on the nature of the relationship be-
ground History, and (8) Recommendations. tween the opposing parties In a dispute. The
Part 51s the Case Information File. Case infor- average record length for Part 1 Is 142 char-
mation was drawn from court records. It in- acters, and the maximum record length is
cluded Information on the type of case, num- 1,029 characters. In Part 2, the microcom-
ber of charges, sentence type, sentence puter version of the dataset described above,
severity (stated and perceived), seriousness there are a9,607 records generated from the
of offense, date of arrest, date of arraignment, same 4,050 disputes. The average record
date of conference, prior incarceration, and length Is 112 characteristics with the maxi-
defendant background information. There are mum length being 249 characters. Parts 1
91 variables for 1,073 cases in the Case Infor- and 2 are documented by the same code-
mation File, 215 variables for 533 cases In book. Column locations for the first record of
the Conference Observation Rle, 140 vari-

82 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


tha twelfth re<::ord type In the microcomputer Loftln, Coltn and Milton Heumann
data should be Increased by 13 to match the
data The ather records In this group are car- Firearms violence and the Michigan
reedy documented. Felony Firearm Law: Detroit, 1976-1978
Sampling: A random dlglt dialing scheme was (ICPSR 6509)
employed for the screener sUrVeys, and vary-
Ing types of sampling designs were used for This study was sponsored by the United
courts and InstJtutions. See pages 0-7 States Department of Justice, Natlon/;/llnstJ-
through through 0-11 01 Comprehensive Da- Me of JustJce. The grant numbers are 78-NI·
talUe codebook for complete detalls of sam- AX-0021 and 79-NI-AX-0094.
pling procedures.
Summary: This study gauges the Impact of
Unlversa: Disputes processed In the United the Michigan Firearm Law on the processing
States by courts and by alternative third party 01 detendants In Detroit's Recorder's Court.
InstJMlons, and those processed bilaterally, Most variables In the study focus on the de-
I.e., without the Involvement of a third partf. fendant and court processing decisions made
at different stages. Special attention was
Extent of coIlectJon: 4 data files + machlne- given to determining the presence and use of
readable documentation firearms and other weapons In each offense.
Variables Include gender of the defendant,
logical record length data format race of the defendant, original charges, type
of counsel, amount of ball, felony firearm
Part 1 charges, number of convlctJons, race of vic-
Comprehensive civil litigation reports for tim, firearm used, judge, and sentence.
mainframe computers Class III
hierarchical llIe structure In variable blocked
format Universe: All defendants listed In Recorder's
2,000 variables Court Docket Control records who were ar-
raigned for a violent felony.
Part 2
Comprehensive civil litigation reports for !:xtent of collection: 1 data file
micro computers
hierarchical file structure in variable blocked OSIRIS and card image data format
format
2,000 variables rectangUlar file structure
8,414 cases
Part 3 73 variables
Household screener 175-unlt-lon9 record
rectangular file structure 3 records per case
5,202 cases
1,874 variables Related Publications:
4,371-unlt-Ion9 record Heumann, Milton, and Colin Loftin
1 record per case "Mandatory sentencIng and the abolition
of plea bargaining: Law and Society Re-
Part 4 vIew 13 (1979), 393-430.
Organizational screener LoftJn, Coiln, Milton Heumann, and David
rectangular file structure McDowall
1,516 cases "Mandatory sentencing and firearms Vio-
742 variables lence: Evaluating an alternatJve to gun
160·unit-long-~ecord control: Law and SocIety Review 17
1 record per case (1983},287-318.

Part 5
Dispute survey open-ended questions
20,402 cases
84-unlt-long record
1 record per case

Court case processing 83


~~~~--~--~-~--

Mlethe, Terance and Charl~s A. Moore Part 1


County raw data file
Evaluation of Minnesota's felony rectangular file structure
sontonclng guidelines, 1978·1984 6,525 cases
37 variables
(ICPSR 9235) 265-unit-long record
1 record per case
Tlls study was sponsored by the United States
Depmment of Justice, Nallonal Institute of Jus- Part 2
tice. The grmt number Is SS-IJ-CX-0054. Statewide raw data file
rectangular file structure
Summary: This data collection gauges the ef- 19,687 cases
fects of the Minnesota felony sentencing 27 variables
guidelines on prosecutlonal charging prac- 142-unlt-long record
tices, plea negotiations, and sentencing deci- 1 record per case
sions. The collection provides primary
sources for evaluating the statewide changes Related Publications:
In the determinants of charging and sentenc- Mlethe, T.D.
Ing decisions after the sentencing guidelines "Charges and plea bargaining practices
were enacted. In addition, the data flies pro- under determinate sentencing: An Investi-
vide Information on offender, offense, and gation of the hydraulic displacement of dis-
various case processing characteristics. cretion." Journal of CrimInal Law and
Class IV CrimInology 78 (1987), 101-122.
Mlethe, T.D., and C.A. Moore
Universe: Convicted defendants In Minnesota. "Evaluation of Minnesota's felony sentenc-
Ing guidelines." Washington, DC: Final re-
Sampling: Two data flies represent two differ- port submitted to the National Institute of
ent samples. The statewide file contains all of Justice, 1987.
the convictions In the state of Minnesota dur- Moore, C.A., and T.D. Mlethe
Ing the years studied. The county file Is a ran- "Regulated and non-regulated sentencing
dom sample from case flies of convicted fel- decisions: An analysis of first-year prac-
ons who were sentenced during the study tices under Minnesota's felony sentencing
period In eight Minnesota counties. guidelines." Law and SocIety Review 20
(1986),253-2n.
Note: The statewide defendants file contains
Information on offender's demographic char-
acteristics, year of disposition, descriptions of
the convicted offense, criminal history scores,
types of sentence Imposed, the presumptive Miller, Herbert S., William F. McDonald,
disposition and duration of confinement, dis- and James A. Cramer
positional location In the sentencing grid of
the guidelines, and types of dispositional de- Plea bargaining In the United States,
parture from presumptive sentences. Vari- 1978
ables In the eight-county sample data are
similar to those available In the statewide (ICPSR 7775)
data. However, the county sample data con-
tain additional Information on characteristics This study was sponsored by the United States
of cases and case processing variables such Department of Justice, Nallonal Institute of Jus-
as whether the defendant was convicted of tice. The grant number Is 77 -NJ-gg.OO49.
mUltiple behavioral incidents and varIous
types of plea bargaining. Summary: This stUdy was conducted In 1978
at the Institute of Criminal Law and Procedure
Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine- of the Georgetown University Law Center.
readable documentation The stUdy consists of three files. The first con-
tains Information from 3,397 case files In six
logical record length data format U.S. cities. Thtl 63 variables Include demo-
graphic Informatfon on the accused and the
victim, past record of the accused, serious-
ness of the offense, pleas entered, speed of
trial process, and sentencing. The second file
contains Information gathered from In-court
observations focusing on the formal supervi-
sion of plea bargaining by judges. There are

84 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


approximately 33 variables for each of the representation of Indigent and unpopular cli·
711 court observations. The third file consists ents; 3) analyzing the Joint causation phe-
of the results ot a plea bargainIng simulation nomenon whereby neither favorable attitudes
game. There are 17 variables for each of the nor favorable opportunities alone lead to rep·
479 cases In the file. Class IV resentatlon of the unpopular but the comblna·
tIon of both together does so substantIally.
The attorneys sample consists of the last
practicing lawyer found at every tenth page of
Nagel, stuart S. the alphabetic sections of the 1970 Mar·
tindale·Hubbeli Legal Directory. There were
Search and selzuro data, 1963 239 useable responses representing 51 per-
cent of the sample. Class IV
(ICPSR 7539)
Related Publication:
The data were obtained In 1963 by mailed Nagel, Stuart S.
questionnaires to one police chief, prosecu- Improving the Isgal process: Effects of al-
ta, trial court Judge, defense attorney, and ternatives. Lexlngton·Heath, 1975.
ACLU officIal In each of the fifty states. Ques·
tlons were asked concerning the practices of
various crIminal Justice decision makers In the
handling of search and seizure evidence
since the 1961 Supreme Court decisIon reo Nagel, Stuart S., Thomas Efmermann, and
qulrlng all states to exclude Illegally seized Kathleen Refnbott
evidence from courtroom proceedings. Ques· Free press, fair trial data, 1970
tions were also asked concerning the knowl·
edge and values of the respondents, and the (ICPSR 7541)
use of civil and legal action to deter Illegal
searches. Of the 250 questionnaire reclpl· The data were obtained In 1970 by mailing
ents, 113 or 45 percent sent back usable 600 questionnaires to newspaper editors, po.
questionnaires. Class IV lice chiefs, prosecuting attorneys and defense
attorneys from a sample of 166 cities across
Related Publications: the country. Quastlons asked mainly con·
Nagel, Stuart S. cerned: 1) the degree of pretrial press public-
·Testing the effects of excluding Illegally Ity in pending criminal cases, 2) relevant attl·
seized eVIdence: Wisconsin Law Review tUdes, especially concerning ways of
(1965) 283·310. reducing the adverse effects of pretrial public·
Nagel, Stuart S. Ity while stili having an Informed public, and,
The legal process from a behavioral per- 3) 30 prevailing procedures by £IditOl'S, pollee,
spective. Dorsay Press, 1969. prosecutors, defense attorneys and Judges.
Flfty·four percent of the newspaper £IditOl'S,
65 percent of the police chiefs, 50 percent of
the prosecuting attorneys, and 48 percent of
Nagel, Stuart S. and Anthony S, Charrpagne the defense attorneys, representing all 50
states, responded. Class IV
Legal representation data, 1970
Related Publications:
(ICPSR 7540) Nagel, Stuart S., K. Reinbolt, and T. Elmermann
"A linear programming approach to prob.
These data were obtained In 1970 by malling lems of conflicting legal values like free
questionnaires to a random sample of 474 at· press versus falr trial." Rutgers Journal of
torneys across the country. Questions were Compurers and the Law (1975).
asked concerning their experiences In repre- Nagel, Stuart S., K. Reinbolt, and T. Elmermann
senting IndIgent or unpopular clients, their attl· "Free press-fair trial controversy: Using
tudes toward such cller'lts, and the charac- empirical analysis to strike a desirable bal·
terIstics of the responding lawyers and their ance.· St. Louis University Law Journal
communIties. The research objectives in· (1976).
cluded: 1) determining the relatIons between
the behavlor of the attorneys In representing
Indigent or unpopular clients and the atti·
tudes, specialities, backgrounds and environ·
ments of the attorneys; 2) arriving at some
policy recommendations for Increasing the

Court case proceSSing 85


Nagel, stuart S., Paul Wice, and Marian cases and defendants, the officials Involved In
Neff the cases, personality characteristics of offi·
clals and the perceptions that these officials
Pretrial release data, 1969 have of each other. Class IV
(ICPSR 7538) Universe: Defendants in Michigan, lilinols,
and Pennsylvania.
The survey Involved asking police chiefs,
judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys and Sampling: Three counties In three states with
ball project directors In 80 cities a variety of populations between 100,000 and 1,000,000
quastions concerning the processing of ar- In Michigan, illinois and Pennsylvania.
rested persons prior to trial. The research ob-
Jectives Included: 1) developing a model de- Extent of collection: 1 data file + SPSS con-
signed to determine the optimum percentage trol cards
of defendants to hold prior to trial, 2) develop-
Ing a model designed to make decisions on Card image data format
whether a defendant should be released or
held In jail prior to trial, 3) comparing cities rectangular file structure
having ball reform projects with cities not hav- 7,475 cases
Ing them, 4) comparing cities that require ar- 264 variables
rested persons to provide 10 percent of the 80·unit·long record
bond with cities requiring 100 percent of the 27 records per case
bond, and 5) determining the causes and ef-
fects of variations across cities In the percent- Related Publications:
age of defendants held In jail prior to trial. The Nardulll, Peter F., Eisenstein, James, and
data were obtained by mailing questionnaires Roy B. Fleming
In 1969 to judges, prosecutors, defense attor- "Sentencing as a sociopolitical process:
neys and ball project directors In 80 cities. Of Environmental, contextual, and Individual
the 280 questionnaires mailed, 156 respon- level dimensions." Unpublished final report
dents or 56 percent sent back usable ques- submitted to NIJ, June 30,1983.
tionnaires. The questionnaire recipients were Eisenstein, James, Nardulll, Peter F., and
determined by consulting such directories as Roy B. Flemming
the American Bar Association Criminal Law "Interim report: Explaining and assessing
Directory and the Martindale·Hubbell Legal criminal case disposition: A comparative
Directory. Class IV study of nine counties." Unpublished reo
port submitted to NIJ, August 31, 1982.
Related Publications:
Nagel, Stuart S., P. Wlce, and M. Neff
Too much or too little policy: The example
of pretrIal release. Sage Publications,
1977. National Center for state Courts
Nagel, Stuart S., and M. Neff
Legal policy ana~vsis: Rnding an optimum Criminal case processing in
level or mix. Lexington·Heath, 1977. metropolitan courts, 1976
(lCPSR 7750)

In 1977, the National Center for State Courts,


Nardulll, Peter, James Eisenstein, and Roy in cooperation with the National Conference
B. Fleming of Metropolitan Courts, began a reseai'ch and
demonstration project on delay In major met·
Comparing court case processing In ropolitan courts. The objectives were: 1) to de-
nine courts, 1979-1980 termine the scope and extent of delay In such
courts, 2) to identify factors associated with
(ICPSR 8621) delay, and 3) to suggest and ultimately test
techniques which might work to reduce delay.
This study was sponsored by the United States The variables include geographic location, dis·
Department of Justice, Nationa Institute of Jus- position type, most serious charge against de·
tice. The grant number is 81-IJ·CX·0027 fendant, and dates of arrest, trial, disposition,
and sentencing. There are 10,476 records in
Summary: This study looks at the charac- the data file and 14 variables. Class I
teristics of officials who are Involved in court
case processing. Data were collected on

86 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


----------- .. ---

National Center for State Courts Related Publication:


National Center for State Courts, Court Statis-
State court statistics, 1987: tics Project
[United States} "state court caseload statistics: Report
1987." Williamsburg, VA: National Center
(ICPSR 9266) for State Courts, 1989 (Publication No.
R-109).
Summary: This data collection provides com-
parable measures of stata appellate and trial
court caseloads by type of case for the 50
states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto
Rico. Court caseloads are tabulated accord- Pretrial Services Resource Center
Ing to generic reporting categories developed National pretrial reporting program,
by the Court Statistics and Technology Com-
mittee of the Conference of State Court Ad- 1988-1989
ministrators. These categories describe differ- (ICPSR 9508)
ences In the unit of count and the point of
count when compiling each court's caseload. Summary: This data collection effort was un-
Major areas of investigation Include: (1) case dertaken to determine whether accurate and
filings In state appellate and trial courts, (~) comprehensive pretrial data can be collected
case dispositions In state appellate and tnal at the local level and subsequently aggre-
courts, and (3) appellate opinions. Within gated at the state and federal levels. The data
each of these areas of Investigation, cases contained In this collection provide a picture
are separated by main case type. Types In- of felony defendants' movaments through the
clude civil cases, capital pUnishment cases, criminal courts and what happens during the
other criminal cases, juvenile cases, adminis- course of their journey. Offenses were ra-
trative agency appeals, and several other coded into 14 broad categories that conform
types. Class IV to the Bureau of Justice Statistics crime defini-
tions. Other variables Include sex and age,
Universe: State appellate and trial court prior record, relationship to criminal Justice
cases in the Unltad States. system at the time of tha offense, pretrial re-
lease, detention decisions, court appear-
Note: Both parts of this collection contain aI- ances pretrial rearrest, adjudication and sen-
phabetlcs. SPSS/PC+ control cards accom- tencing, and elapsed time events. The unit of
pany each file. analysis is the defendant. Class II
Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine- Universe: Felony court filings during February
readable documentation 1988 in the 75 most populous counties in the
United StahlS.
Card image data format
Sampling: In a two-stage sampling process,
Part 1 the first stage was a stratified sample to se-
Appellate court data lect 4Q of the most populous counties, and
rectangular file structure the second stage was a systematic sample of
94 cases felony filings (defendants) within each se-
190 variables lected county.
80-unit-long record
10 records per case Extent of collection: 1 data file + machlne-
readable documentation + SPSS Control
Part 2 Cards
Trial court data
rectangular file structure OSIRIS and card image data format, with
183 cases SPSS control cards for each
182 variables
BO-unlt-Iong record rectangUlar file structure
13 records per case 11,063 cases
103 variables
332-unit-long record
8 records per case

Court case processing 87


Sipes, Dale Anne and Mary Elsner Oram Part 1
Civil trial file
Analyzing trial time In California, rectangular file structure
Colorado, and New Jersey, 1986 827 cases
172 variables
(ICPSR 9223) 80-unlt-long record
7 records per case
llis study was sponsored by the United States
Depa1ment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- Part 2
tice. The grmt number Is as-IJ-CX-0044. Criminal trial file
rectangular file structure
Summary: This study of nine courts was un- 624 cases
dertaken to Identify procedural factors that 1'72 variables
can be used to reduce the length of criminal 80-unlt-long record
and civil trials without impairing fairness. The 7 records per case
data collection provides direct Information on
the actual amount of time consumed by vari- Part 3
ous trial segments and the perceived length Judge survey file
of trial segments as gauged by judges and at- rectangular file structure
torneys. In ad~ition, ~ata are supplied o~ the 57 cases
legal community's attitlJdes toward existing 150 variables
trial length, reasons fOl' it, and judicial control 80-unit-long record
over it. The trial case file contains Information 4 records per case
on types of cases and trials, estimated trial
length, type of disposition, type of defense at- Part 4
torney, number of claims, cross-claims and Criminal attorney survey file
counterclaims, number of exhibits introduced, rectangular file structure
number of expert and lay witnesses called by 197 cases
the defense, number of peremptory chal- 78 variables
lenges, and day and time the trial ended. 80-unit-long record
The questionnaire data contaln Information 2 records per case
on professional experiences, number of
cases tried per month, opinions about time Part 5
consumed by each segment of the trial, esti- Civil attorney survey file
mated time used In each segment, and atti- rectangular file structure
tudes toward judicial control over the trial 131 cases
length. Class IV 713 variables
80-unit-long record
Universe: Civil and criminal trial cases, trial 3 records per case
judges, and civil and criminal attorneys in Cali-
fornia, Colorado, and New Jersey'. Related Publication:
Sipes, D.A., and M.E. Dram
Sampling: There are two samples. In the trial ·On trial: The length of civil and criminal tri-
case sample, cases were obtained from a als." Williamsburg, VA: National Center for
convenience sample of ongoing trials heard State Courts, 1988.
during M~ch 1986-January 1987 in three
counties In each of the three states. For the
survey', mailing lists of judges, civil plaintiffs
attorneys, private criminal defense attorneys,
criminal prosecutors, and public defenders Sparks, Richard F.
were obtained from the court administrator's
office at each site. Completed surveys were Massachusetts statewide criminal
received from 57 judges (50 percent re- justice guidelines evaluation, 1979:
sponse rate), 197 criminal attorneys (47 per- Sentencing data
cent) and 131 civil attorneys (38 percent).
(ICPSR 7909)
Extent of collection: 5 data files + SPSS con·
trol cards This study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
Card image data format tice. The grant number is 78-NI-AX-0147.

Summary: The Evaluation of Statewide Sen-


tencing Guidelines project was established to

88 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


study the development, Implementation a1d tual survey was conducted. The inmate back-
use of state-wide sentencing guidelines a1d to grolXld data file, therefore, Includes Informa-
report on the perceptions of criminal justice sys- tion on both survey respondents and non-re-
tem personnel and Inmates regarding those spondents. The Inmate Stxvey Data file
glide lines. The project was carried out by the contalns information on 146 Inmates'. Fre-
Rutgers University School of Criminal Justice quency distributions for the 209 variables are
from October 1978 to June 1981. The Massa- included in this documentation, as is the sur-
crusetts Sentencing Data contalns Informatloo vey instrument. Both the Inmate Background
on a IC¥1dom sample of 1,440 convicted defen- Data and the Inmate Survey Data are avall-
da1ts sentenced In the Massa::husetts Supe- able In card-image format, with one and five
rior Colrl between November 1977, and Octo- records per case, respectively. Class IV
ber 1978. The sal'nple represents
approximately one third of the actual number of
defendants sentenced in the Massachusetts
S4lerior Colrl during a one year period. The
cases were selected a1d coded by the Massa- Sparks, Richard F.
crusetts Sentencing Guidelines project dlXing New Jersey statewide criminal Justice
1979. The 128 variables include Information guidelines evaluation, 1980: Inmate
about each defenda1t's social and economic
backgrOlXld, jwenile and alLit criminal history, survey data
characteristics of the current offense, and the (ICPSR 7911)
elements of the disposition of the current of-
fense. Data are avallable In card-Image format The Evaluation of Statewide Sentencing Glide-
with three records per case. Class IV lines project was established to study the devel-
opment, implementation and use of statewide
sentencing guidelines and to report on the per-
ceptions of criminal justice system persomel
Sparks, Richard F. and inmates regarding those guidelines.
Funded by the National Institute of Law En-
New Jersey statewide criminal justice forcement and Criminal Justice, the project
guidelines evaluation, 1979 was carried out by the Rutgers University
School of Criminal Justice from October 1978,
(ICPSR 7910) to JlXle 1981. One part of the research con-
sisted of interviewing Inmates about their atti-
The Evaluation of Statewide Sentencing Guide- tudes toward the relative seriousness of of-
lines project was established to study the devel- fenses, severity of plXllshments, appropriate
opment, Il'T'Plementation a1d use of statewide penalties for various kinds of crimes, and about
sentencing guidelines a1d to report on the per- their perceptions of sentencing guidelines as a
ceptions of criminal justice system persomel tool to structure judidal sentencing decisions.
and Inmates regarding those guidelines. The 1980 New Jersey Inmate SUrvey Data in-
Funded by the National Institute of Law Enforce- eludes 191 variables for eooh of 157 inmates
ment and Criminal Justice, the project was car- interviewed. The frequency distributions and
ried out by the Rutgers University School of survey instrument are Inciuded in this documen-
Criminal Justice from October 1978, to JlXle tation. The data are avallable in card-Image for-
1981. One part of the research consisted of in- mat with 4 records per case. Class IV
terviewing inmates aboot their attitudes toward
the relative seriousness of offenses, severity of
ptXlishments, appropriate penalties for various
kinds of crimes, a1d about their perceptions of
sentencing guidelines as a tool to structure judi- Taberg, Mary A.
dal sentencing decisions. The 1979 NewJer- Pretrial release practices In the United
~ Inmate data are in tv.o files: Inmate Back-
grOlXld Data, a1d Inmate Survey Data_ The states, 1976·1978
Inmate Bookground Data file includes 25 vari- (ICPSR 7972)
ables contalning socioeconomic, residential,
and current and prior crln-Jnal history Informa- This study was sponsored by the United States
tion on a random sample of 226 Rahway New Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
Jersey State Prison inmates. Background infor- tice. The grant number is 79-NI-AX-0038.
mation was coliected for all of the Inmates se-
lected to participate In the 1979 New Jersey in- Summary: This is Phase II of a larger project
mate survey. However, not all of inmates to evaluate pretrial release practices. This
selected agreed to be interviewed when the 00-

Court case processing 89


study focuses on four major topics: release- Summary: This data collection examines the
rates and types of releases, defendant or impact of defendants' prior criminal records
case character/stlcs and their Impact on the on the sentencing of male and female defen-
release decision; court appearance-extent dants committing violent and nonviolent
to which released defendants appear In court, crimes. The collection also provides data on
factors associated with defendants' fallure to which types of prior records most influenoed
appear in court; pretrial crimlnality-the num- the sentencing judges. Variables deal specifi-
ber of re-arrests during the pretrial period and cally with the defendant, the judge and the
the factors predicting re-arrest, charges and characteristics of the current case. Only
rates of conviction for crimes committed dur- cases that felt into one of the 14 categories of
Ing the pretrial period; impact of pretrial re- common offenses were included. These of-
lease programs-effect of programs on re- fenses were murder, manslaughter, rape, rob-
lease decisions and on behavior of bery, assauit, minor assault, burglary, auto
defendants. The study Is limited to adult de- theft, embezzlement, receiving stolen prop-
fendants processed through state and local erty, forgery, sex offenses other than rape,
trial courts, and to pretrial release rather than drug possession, and driving while intoxi-
pretrial Intervention or diversion progrMls. cated. Class IV
Part One is an analysis of release practices
and outcomes in eight jurisdictions (Baltimore Universe: All defendants in felony cases
City and Baltimore County, Maryland; Wash- heard between 1968 and 1979 in a large
ington, D.C.; Dade County, Aorida; Jefferson northeastern city.
County, Kentucky; Pima County, Arizona;
Santa Cruz County, California; and Santa Sampling: Random sample of convicted de-
Clara County, California). The pretrial release fendants selected from a larger sample. The
"delivery systems," that is, the major steps, In- sample was stratified by the gender of the
dividuals and organizations In the pretrial re- judge with sampling fractions of .2 for male
lease process, were analyzed in each jurisdic- and 1.0 for female judges, yielding a larger
tion. Additionally, a sample of deferdants from number of female judges in the final sample.
each site was studied from point of arrest to fi-
nal case disposition a"ld sentencing. PartTwo Extent of collection: 1 data file
of this study examines the impact of the exist-
ence of pretrial release programs on release, Card Image data format
court appearance a"ld pretrial release out-
comes. For this, a"l experimental design was rectangular file structure
used to compare a group of defendants who 5,562 cases
pa1icipated in a pretrial release program with a 19 variables
control grot.p who did not. Experiments were 80-unit-long record
conciJcted In Pima County (Tucson), Arizona; 1 record per case
Baltimore City, Maryland; Uncaln, Nebraska;
Jefferson County (Beaumont-Port Arthur), Related Publications:
Texas. In Tucson, separate experiments were Gruhl, J., C. Spohn, and S. Welch
conciJcted for felony a"ld misdemeanor cases. ·Women as policymakers: the case of trial
The data ard documentation are available In judges." American Journal of Political Sci-
OSIRIS ard card-image format. Part 1 con- ence 25 (1981), 308-322.
tains 223 va-icbles for 3,410 records with a logi- Spohn, C., and S. Welch
c:a record length of 362 characters. Part 2 con- "The effect of prior record in sentencing re-
tains 274 variables for 1,598 records with a search: An examination of the assumption
logical record length of 428 characters. Ciass II that any measure is adequate." Justice
Quarterly 4 (1987), 2B7-302.
Uhlman, Thomas, M.
"The impact of defendant race in trial-court
Welch, Susan and Cassia Spohn sanctioning decisions." In John A.
Gardiner (ed.), Public Law and Public Po/-
Effects of prior record In sentencing icy. New York, NY: Praeger, 1977.
research In a large northeastern city,
1968·1979: [United States]
(ICPSR 8929)

T1is study was sponsored by the United States


Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
1Ice. The gra"lt number is 84-IJ-CX-0035.

90 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Courts

Bureau of Justice Statistics, Bureau of JUstice Statistics,


U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Justice
Census of state felony courts, 1985: National Judicial reporting program,
[United states] 1986: [United States]
(ICPSR 8667) (ICPSR 9073)

Summary: The purpose of this study was to Summary: This data collection tabulates the
update the directory listing of felony courts In number of persons convicted of felonies In
this country, and to provide a universe from state courts and describes the sentences
which a sample of courts could be selected these Individuals receiVed. Data were col-
based on felony caseload. The study Includes lected from state courts and state prosecutors
Information on all state felony courts In the In 100 counties of the United States. The col-
United States, Including the number of cases lection contains soclodemographlc Informa-
filed and dispoGed by conviction, acquittal, dis- tion such as age, race, and sex of felon.
missal, or other means. Court administrators Types of offenses committed Include homi-
were asked to Indicate the manner In Which cide, rape, and robbery. Adjudication vari-
cases filed and disposed were counted, such ables referring to the process between arrest
as by defendant, charge, or Indictmentlinfor- and sentencing are also a part of this dataset.
malion. The total number of cases disposed Data can be analyzed on a national level or
during the period was also collected for juve- by the Individual counties. Class II
nile delinquents and fex traffic offenses (mov-
Ing violations,) where applicable. Finally, data Universe: Sentenced felons In the United
were gathered on whether felonies reduced States.
to misdemeanors were Included In the felony
count and whether felonies reduced to misde- Sampling: A two-stage stratified cluster sam-
meanors were Included In the felony count pling design was employed. At the first stage
and whether lower courts In the jurisdiction ac- all counties In the nation were divided Into six
cept guilty pleas to felonies. Class II strata. At the second stage, a systematic sam-
ple of felons sentenced for murder/nonnegll-
Universe: All general Jurisdiction courts In the gent manslaughter, rape, robbery, aggravated
United States. assault, burglary, felony larceny/motor vehicle
theft, drug tralficking, and other offenses was
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- selected from each county's official records.
readable documentatIon + SPSS control cards
Extent of collection; 1 data file + machine-
OSIRIS and card image data formats, with readable documentation + SPSS control
SPSS control cards for each cards

rectangular file structure OSIRIS and card image data formats, with
3,590 cases SPSS control cards for each
48 varIables
193-unit-long record rectangular file structure
3 records per case 55,966 cases
66 variables
293-unlt-long record
5 records per case

Courts 91
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Related Publication:
U.S. Department of Justice Langan, Patrick A., and John N. Dawson
"Felony sentences in state courts, 1988."
National Judicial reporting program, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Print-
1988: [United States] ing Office, December 1990.
(ICPSR 9449)

Summary: This data collectJon tabulates the


number of persons convicted of felonies In Bureau of Justice Statistics,
state courts and describes the sentences U.S. Department of Justice
these Individuals received. Data were col-
lected from state courts and state prosecutors National survey of court organization:
In 100 countJes of the United States. The coI- Courts and court diVision, 1971-1972
lectJon contains soclodemographlc Informa- (ICPSR 7640)
tJon such as age, race, and sex of felon.
Types of offenses committed Include homi-
cide, rape, and robbery. Adjudication vari- The study was conducted for the Bu\ea~ of
ables referring to the process between arrest Justice Statistics by the Government s DIVi-
and sentencing are also a part of thIs dataset. sion of the Bureau of the Census. Its purpose
Data can be analyzed on a national. level or was to document the existing organization of
by the Individual counties. Class II courts In the 50 states and the District of Co-
lumbia as of 1971-1972. The survey covers
Universe: Sentenced felons in the United all appellate courts, courts of general jurisdic-
States. tion special courts, and other courts of limited
juri~dlction. Excluded were justJces of the
Sampling: A two-stage stratified cluster sam- peace and similar magls~ates whose .com-
pling design was employed. At the first stage pensation Is solely on a dlrec~ fe~ ~asls, and
300 counties wore selected from the 3,109 to- courts of limited or special JUrisdiction located
taJ counties In the nation. At the second In municipalities or townships with a 1960
stage a systematic sample of felons sen- population of less than 1,000. The data are
tenced for murder/non-negligent manslaugh- stored In a hierarchical fashion with two lev-
ter, rape, robbery, aggravated assault. bur- els: courts and subdivisions. There are
glary, felony larceny/motor vehicle theft, drug 17 061 records for courts and 20,799 records
trafficking, and other offenses were selected for'subdivlslons. The data for courts include:
from each county's official records. organization of the court; geographic location;
type of court; level of government administer-
Note: Users wishing to reconstruct figures in ing the court; number, types, and full- or part-
the Bureau of Justice Statistics report based tJme status of judicial and other personnel;
on these data titled "Felony Sentences in method of appealing cases; location of court
State Courts, 1988" also will need to use Uni- records and type of statistics. Data for court
form Crime Reporting Program Data subdivisions include: organization of the
[United States]: Detai/ed Arrest and Of· courts; geographic location; type of court;
fense Data for 321 Counties, 1988 (lCPSR level of government administering the court;
9470). types of jurisdiction; percentage of judges'
time spent on types of cases; availability of
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- jury trials; and length of sentence and
readable documentation + SPSS Control amounts of fines which may be imposed by
Cards the court. This dataset Is available either In a
hierarchical or a rectangular file. If requesting
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with these data or documentation for the study,
SPSS control cards for each please specify the type of file desired so that
appropriate documentation can be sent. Data
rectangular file structure and documentation were prepared by the
80,930 cases Center for Advanced Computation, University
71 variables of lilinois, Urbana. Class II
300-unit-long record
5 records per case Related Publication:
Bureau of Justice Statistics
"National survey of court organization."
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Print-
ing Office, Stock No. 2700-00228.

92 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Abt Associates, Inc. log the match file with SAS and SPSSX com-
mercial software packages.
Federal Justice statistics program
data, 1978-1986: [United States] Restrictions: Federal law prohibits the use of
these files for any purposes other than
(ICPSR 9296) research.
Summary: Data In this collection examine the Extent of collection: 12 data files + SAS con-
processing of lederal ollenders. The Docket trol cards
and Reporting System files Include Informa-
tion on suspec;ts In Investigative matters that logical record length data format
took an hour or more 01 a United States attor-
ney's time with one of the following out- Parts 1-3
comas: (1) the United States attorney de- Federal cases terminated, 1984-1986
clined to prosecute, (2) the case was flied J~ rectan~ular file structure
federal district court, or (3) the matter was dIS- 50,795 to 55,687 cases per part
posed by a United States magistrate. Codes 49 variables
for each disposition and change of status are 142-unlt-long record
also provided. The Cases Terminated files 1 record per case
contain information about defendants In crimi-
nal cases filed in the United States federal dis- Parts 4·7
trict court and terminated In the calendar year Federal docket and reporting system data,
Indicated. Defendants In criminal cases may 1983-1985
either be Individuals or I.;orporatlons, and rectangular file structure
there Is one record for each delendant In 49,220 to 181,443 cases per part
each case terminated. D£lta on court proceed- 85 variables
ings, date the case was filed, date the case 340-unit-Iong record
was terminated, most serious charge, and 1 record per case
reason for termination are Included. The Pre-
trial Services Data present variables on the Part 8
circuit, district, and office where the defendant Federal pretrial services data, 1983-1986
was charged, type of action, year of birth and rectangular file structure
sex of the defendant, major offense charge, 101,831 cases
and results of initial and detention hearings. 203 variables
The Parole Decisions Data contain informa- 444-unlt-long record
tion from various parole hearings such as 1 record per case
court date, appeal action, reopening decision,
sentence, severity, offense, and race and eth- Part 9
nicity of the defendant. Class IV Federal parole decisions data, 1978-1986
rectangular file structure
Universe: For the Docket and Reporting Sys- 259,191 cases
tem Data files the universe is all suspects in 43 variables
federal offenses on whose cases the United 158-unit-long record
States Attorney spent one hour or more. For 1 record per case
the Pretrial Services Data the universe is all
federal arrestees interviewed for or granted Part 10
pretrial release. For the Parole Decisions Match index file
Data the universe is ali offenders convicted, rectangular file structure
sentenced to prison, and eligible for parole. 411,401 cases
Offenders with prison sentences shorter tha" 9 variables
one year are not eligible for parole. 29-unit-long record
1 record per case
Note: For Users who wish to follow particular
defendants as they progress through various Part 15
federal agencies, a match Index file Is in- Offenders on supervision, 1984-1986
cluded. To track particular defendants, one rectangular file structure
must match records from two or more data 176,366 cases
files. The match index file contains the se- 149 variables
quential record numbers and case identifica- 796-unit-long record
tion numbers for all individual cases. The 1 record per case
codebook provides further information on us-

Courts 93
Part 16 Part 1
Offenders who terminated supervision, County data
1984-1986 rectangular file structure
rectangular file structure 491 cases
76,612 cases 46 variables
149 variables 289-unlt-long record
796-unlt-long record 4 records per case
1 record per case
Part 2
Related Publications: Preliminary program data
Bureau of Justice Statistics rectangular file structure
"Federal criminal cases, 1980-87: Federal 750 cases
offenses and offenders." Washington, DC: 180 variables
Bureau of Justice Statistics, July 1989. 461-unlt-long record
Bureau of Justice Statistics 6 records per case
"Pretrial release and detention: The ball re-
form act of 1984." Washington, DC: Bu- Part 3
reau of Justice Statistics, February 1988. Conflict program data
rectangular file structure
148 cases
180 variables
461-unlt-long record
Abt Associates, Inc. 6 records per case
National Indigent criminal defense
survey, 1982: [United States]
(ICPSR 8417) Aikman, Alexander, Mary Bsner Cram,
Summary: This survey was conducted to pro- and Frederick Miller
vide defense practitioners, policy makers, and Use of adjuncts to supplement Judicial
planners in the criminal justice system with
resources In six Jurisdictions,
national-level data on topics such as system
types, funding sources, costs, and caseloads 1983·1986: [United States]
of Indigent defense programs. The goal of the (ICPSR 8979)
survey effort was to obtain data concerning
the nature and scope of Indigent service deliv- ThIs study Vvas sponsored by the United States
ery. Specifically, the three basic objectives Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
were to provide descriptive data, to assess tice. The grant number is 83-IJ-CX-0021.
the level of response to defense service deliv-
ery requirements, and to facilitate further re- Summary: This multi-site data collection
search. Class II evaluates the Impact of Judicial adjunct attor-
neys and referees on the court system at the
Universe: Indigent defense programs In the county and state levels In six Jurisdictions: (1)
United States. Pima County, Arizona, (2) Multnomah County,
Oregon, (3) King County, Washington, (4)
Sampling: Stratified random sample based on Hennepin County, Minnesota, (5) Phoenix,
county population size, as reported In the Arizona, and (6) the state of Connecticut •.
1980 Census of the Population. There are three different units of observation
In this study: (1) civil trial cases, (2) trial
Extent of collection: 3 data files + machine- judges, Including regular Judges and adjunct
readable documentation + SPSS control attorneys, and (3) litigating attorneys. The
cards court case data include information on type of
case, date of trial, type of judge, type of dispo-
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with sition, and date of disposition. For the ques-
SPSS control cards for each tionnaire data obtained on judges, adjuncts,
and litigating attorneys, information Includes
experience with the program, satisfaction,
and Ideas for changes. Class IV

Sampling: Sampling procdeures varied by


site. In Tucson all the civil court trial cases dis-

94 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


posed by Judicial adjuncts or regular Judges Part 4
between January 1984 and March 1985 were Connecticut superior court referee dabl
selected. The first 50 civil cases disposed rectangular file structure
each quarter that requested Jury trials also 31 cases
were Included In the sample. In Portland 10 38 variables
percent of the cases with motions for sum- aO-unlt-long record
mary Judgments heard by judicial adjuncts 1 record per case
and regular Judges between January 1983
and December 1985 were selected for the Part 5
sample. In Minneapolis the sample consisted Connectlcul superior court attorney data
of all the civil cases referred to arbitration rectangular file structure
hearings conducted by adjunct attorneys from 16 cases
September 1985 to June 1986. In Seattle the 36 variables
sample Included regular Judges, adjunct attor- SO-unlt-Iong record
neys, and litigating attorneys who responded 1 record per case
to a malled questionnaire. In PhoeniX the
sample InclUded civil appeals that were dis- Part 6
posed by adjunct attorneys and Judges be- Multnomah County circuit court data
tween 1983 and 1985. In Connecticut a sam- rectangular file structure
ple was selected from all the civil cases 252 cases
referred to the trial reference program In three 17 variables
Superior Courts from January 1984 through 80-unit-long record
June 1985. For Connecticut there Is also a 1 record per case
sample of regular Judges, trial adjunct attor-
neys, litigating attorneys, and clients who re- Part 7
sponded to a mailed questionnaire. King County panelist data
rectangular file structure
Extent of collection: 10 data files + SPSS con- 27 cases
trol cards 68 variables
BO-unit-Iong record
Card Image data format with SPSS control 1 record per case
cards
Part 8
Part 1 King County attorney data
Hennepin County civil case data rectangular file structure
rectangular file structure 44 cases
1,1B1 cases 50 variables
37 variables 80-unlt-long record
BO-unlt-Iong record 1 record per case
1 record per case
Part 9
Part 2 Pima County pro tem program
Phoenix civil case dat& rectangular file structure
rectangular file structure 306 cases
1,703 cases 38 variables
36 variables 80-unit-long record
BO-unit-Iong record 1 record per case
1 record per case
Part 10
Part 3 Pima County jury trial data
Connecticut superior court data rectangular file structure
rectangular file structure 160 cases
217 cases 38 variables
39 variables 80-unit.long record
BO-unlt-Iong record 1 record per case
1 record per case
Related Publication:
Alkarn, Alexander B., Mary Elsner Cram, and
Frederick G. Miller
Friends of the courts: Lawyers as supple-
mental judicial resources.

Courts 95
Association of the Bar of the Cny of NGW on at least one felony charge In Manhattan's
York and the Drug Abuse Council, Inc. Criminal Court In 1972 and 1975, were
sampled.
New York drug law evaluation project,
1973 Criminal court study file: The data contain
1,802 records, 901 respondents, 2 records
(ICPSR 7656) per respondent, and approximately 44 vari-
ables. The purpose of this study was to esti-
T1is study was sponsored by the United States mate the number and proportion of felony
Depcrtmsnt of Justice, National Institute of Jus- crimes committed In Manhattan that are attrlb·
tice. The grMt number Is 76-NI-GG-0115. utable to narcotics users. Case records for
male defendants, ages 16 and OVfK, who
Summary: The Association of the Bar of the were arraigned on at least one felony charge
City of New York and the Drug Abuse Council In Manhattan's Criminal Court or Manhattan's
jointly organized a committee and research Supreme Court, were sampled from 1971
project to collect data, In a systematic fash- through 1975. Eighty percent of the sample
Ion, about the 1973 drug law revision and to was drawn from the Criminal Court while the
evaluate the law's effectiveness. The objec- remalnlng 20 percent was taken from the Su-
tives of the project were: 1) to ascertain the re- preme Court.
percussions of the drug law revision; 2) to
analyze, to the degree possible, why the law Prison detox study file: The data contain
was revised; 3) to Identify any general princi- 7,100 records, 3,550 respondents, 2 records
ples or specific lessons that can be derived per respondent, and approximately 67 vari-
from the New York experience and that can ables. The purpose of this study was to esti-
be helpful to other states as they wrestie with mate the number and proportion of felony
the problem of illegal drug use and related crimes attributable to narcotics users In Man·
crime. Class" hattan. Detained malE!ll ages 16 and over In
Manhattan pretrial detention centers who face
Ave files contained within the study are being at least one current felony charge were
released at this time. These files are de- sampled.
scribed as follows:

Ex-drug user file: The data contain 867 re-


cords, with 289 cases, 3 records per respon-
dent, and 169 variables. The purpose of this Church, Thomas W., Jr.
survey was to determine the extent of knowl- AsseSSing local legal culture:
edge of the 1973 drug law among ex-drug Practitioner nonns In four criminal
users In drug treatment programs, and to dis-
cover any changes In their behavlur In re- courts, 1979
sponse to the new law. Interviews were given (ICPSR 7808)
to 289 non-randomly selected volunteers
from three modalilies: residential drug·free ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
programs, ambulatory methadone mainte- Department of Justice, Nationalinstttute of Jus-
nance programs, and the detoxification unit of tice. The grant number Is 78·MU-AX-0023.
the New York City House of Detention for
Men. Summary: This study attempted to operation-
allze the concept of local legal culture by ex-
Predicate felony file: The data contain 443 amining differences In the processing of 12
records, with 443 cases, 1 record per respon- hypothetical criminal cases In four criminal
dent, and approximately 39 variables. The courts. Questionnaires asking how these hy-
purpose of this study was to Investigate the ef· pothetical cases should best be handled were
fects of the 1973 predicate felony provisions administered to judges, district attorneys, and
on crime committed by repeat offenders. defense attorneys In four cities: Bronx County
(New York City), New York; Detroit, Michigan;
Charge reduction study file: The data con- Miami, Florida; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
taln 319 records, with 319 cases, 1 record per In each city, the presiding judge, prosecutor,
respondent, and approximately 27 variables. and head of the public defender's office were
The purpose of the study was to estimate the informed of the project. QUestionnaires were
number and proportion of felony crimes com- distributed to prosecuting attorneys and pub-
mitted in Manhattan that are attributable to lic defenders by their supervisors. Judges
narcotics users. Case records for male defen- were contacted in person or given question-
dants, ages 16 and OVfK, who were arraigned naires with a cover letter from the presiding

96 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


judge. All ques~onnalres were completed Related Publication:
anonymously and returned separately by re- Cole, G.F=., B. Mahoney, M. Thornton, and
spondents. The variables Include number of R.A. Hanson
years respondent had been In the criminal JUs. "The practices and attitudes of trial court
~ce system, preferred mode of disposition judges regarding flnes as a criminal sane·
and of sentencing for eOlCh 01 the twelve ~on." Williamsburg, VA! National Center
cases, and respondents' predictions of the for State Courts, 1987.
probability of convl~on In each case. There
are 242 cases and 111 variables. The data
are available on 187-cl1aracter logical re-
cords. Class II Court Statistics and Information
Management ProJect,
National Center for $tate Courts
Cole, George F. and Bany Mahoney State court statistics, 1978·1980
Flno& as a criminal sanction: Practices (ICPSR 82BO)
and attitudes of trial court ludges In
the United States, 1985 The State Court Statistics are the product of
the National Center for State Court Statistics.
(ICPSR 8945) The study was sponsored by the U.S. Depart-
ment of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States (BJS). The data were collected from annual
Department of Justice, Nationallns~ute of Jus- reports supplied by the Individual states as
1ice. The grmt number Is 84-IJ·CX·0012. well as unpublished materials provIded by dif-
ferent state court administrators and appel-
Summary: These data were collected to ex- late court clerks. Follow-up correspondence
amine the practice and views of state trial and telephone contacts were utilized to co!·
court judges with respect to their Use of fines lect any missing data and to verity the OlCCU-
as a criminal sanc~on. Respondents were racy 01 the data. The Bureau of the Census
asked about the composition of their population estimates pUblished In the Statisti-
case/oads, sentencing practices (Including cal Abstract of the United States were used
fines Imposed for various circumstances), for the population figures for the data The
avallable Information about the offender at unit of analysis for the study Is statewide data
time of sentencing, enforcement and collec- on courts with the same Jurisdiction. The
tion procedures In their courts, and their OItti· years 1979-1980 are covered, and five file
tudes toward the use of fines. In addition to types of d!;lta are Included:
questions concerning the jtJdges' use of fines
and other sanctions, the questionnaire pre- 1. State court caselolld inventory: ThIs da·
sented the judges with hypothetical cases. taset Includes the number of begIn-pendIng,
Class IV filed, disposed, and end· pending cases for
criminal, civil, traffic, and juvenile cases.
Universe: All state court judges of general Ju- There are 268 Variables.
risdiction and limited, but not special, Jurisdic-
tion In the United States. 2. Criminal disposition in state trial courts:
The variables here Include number of trials,
Sampling: Stratified random sample. guilty pleas, convictions, acquIttals, dIsmiss-
als, nolle prosses, balliorieitures, bound
Extent of collection: 1 data file overs, transfers, and dispositions for bench
and jury trials for criminal cases. There are ap-
Card Image data format proximately 370 Variables.
r.:::tangular tile structure 3. Civil disposition in state trial courts: The
1,265 cases d31a have Information on the rumbElf of trials,
144 variables uncontestecVdefault cases, dismlssafs, with-
SO-unlt·long record dr/ilwn/settled cases, transfers, arbitrated
3 records per case cases, and other type dvil bench and jury trials.
There are a total of 258 variables In this file.
4. Traffic disposition In state trial courts:
The data include the number of trials, convic-
tions, guilty pleas, acquittals, dismissals, ball

Courts 97
forfeitures, fines, ti'ansfers, and other traffic Parts 15·28
dlsposi~ons for bench and Jury trials. This file Appellate tormlnatlons flies, 1971·1984
contains 145 variables. rectangular file structure
12,428 to 31,186 cases per part
5. State appellate court caseload inven- 80 variables
tory: These data have variables on the num· 218·unlt·long record
ber of begin· ending, filed, disposed, end· 1 record per case
pending, and ·certiorari granted" cases for
various appeals, original proceedings, reo Parts 29·32
quests to appeal cases, and other appellate· Criminal Terminations, 1984-1987
level case types. Each file of this study has In· rectangular file structure
formation on state population; number of 48,400 to 57,700 cases per part
judges; court's jurisdiction; court's repo~ng 46 variables
year; court's jury and bench trial deflnl~ons; 133· to 134·unlt·long records per part
and court's c/vll and criminal units of court. 1 record per case
The data are for the 50 states, Guam, Puerto
Rico, and the District of Columbia. There are Part 33
15 files each with a logical record length of 80 Criminal pending, 1987
characters. Class II rectangular file structure
37,500 cases
46 variables
134·unlt·long record
1 record per case
Federal Judicial Center
Federal court cases 1970·1989: Parts 34·36
Integrated data base Appellate terminations, 1985·1987
rectangular file structure
(ICPSR 8429) 31 ,388 to 34,444 cases per part
80 variables
Summary: This data collection provides an of· 218·unlt-long record
fiC/al public record of the functioning of the 1 record per case
federal courts. Gathered from 100 court of·
fices throughout the United States, these data Part 37
focus on two points In the life of a case, filing Appel/ate pending, 1987
and termination, and are grouped Into three rectangular file structure
categories: criminal terminations, appellate 26,008 cases
termlna~ons, and appellate pending data. 80 variables
The termination data contain Information on 218·unlt·long record
both filing and termination while the pending 1 record per case
data contain only filing Informa~on. For the ap.
pellate data, the unit of analysis Is a single Parts 38·55
case. The unit of analysis for criminal data Is Civil terminations, 1970·1987
a single defendant. Class II rectangular file structure
80,520 to 238,080 cases per part
Universe: All federal court cases. 42 variables
147·unlt·long record
Exte.,t of collection: 64 data flies + machine· 1 record par case
readable documentation + SPSS control
cards Part 66
Civil pending, 1987
logical record length data format rectangular file structure
243,240 cases
Parts 1·14 42 variables
Criminal terminations files, 1970·1983 147-unit·long record
rectangular file structure 1 record per case
39,400 to 62,500 cases per part
46 variables
133· to 134·unlt·long records per part
1 record per case

98 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 58 Pa~t6f!;
Criminal terminatIons, 1988 CI\li~ !pi\lndlr~!V, 1989
rectangular file structure rOO'II:~\'Jgu!ar fife structure
56,480 cases 242,4QO cases
39 variables 30 vll'Il'Sablss
122-unlt-long record i 3q.-001t.·long record
1 record per case i rl1iCord per case
Part 59
Criminal terminations, 1989
rectangular file structure federal ..I~rdlclal Center
58,720 cases
39 variables JudlcllllldJstrlt.'i data book, 1983:
122-unlt·(ong record [United stl.'lt,9$]
1 record per case
(ICPSR 8439)
Part 60
Criminal pendlng,19S9 The Federal Judicial Center contracted with
rectangular file structura Clarluls Corporation to produce the three
46,400 cases data flies In this collection from the Census
39 variables Bureau's 1983 County and City Data Book.
122-unlt·long record The data. which are summarized by Judicial
1 record per case units, were compiled from a county·level file
and Include Information on area and popula-
Part 62 tion, households, vital statistics, health, In-
Appellate terminations, 1989 come, crimes, housing, education, labor
rectangular file structure force, government finances, manufacturers,
37,400 cases wholesale and retall trade, service Industries,
64 variables and agriculture. The data are In three files.
206·unlt-long record The first file, which provides data for federal
1 record per case judicial districts, has 92 cases; the second
file, federal administrative divisions, has 204
Part 63 cases; and the third file, federal Jury divisions,
Appellate data pending, 1989 has 320 cases. The logical record length of
rectangular file structure each file Is 2,751 characters. Class IV
30,040 cases
64 variables
200-unlt-long record
1 record per case
Grefman, Bernard
Part 64 Multnomah County [Oregon} Jury
Civil terminations, 1988 proJect, 1913·1976
rectangular file structure
238,800 cases (ICPSR 9030)
30 variables
134-unlt-long record The Multnemah County [Oregon1 Jury Pro-
1 record per case ject, 1973-1976 was conducted as part of the
Modeling Jury Decision Project funded by the
Part 65 National Science Foundation. These data rep-
Civil terminations, 1989 resent a census of 32 Jury panels which
rectangular file structure served from July 1973 through March, 1976
235,260 cases in the Fourth Circuit Court In Multnomah
30 variables County (Portland) Oregon. Information was
134-unlt-long record obtained for both six-member and twelve-
1 record per case member juries. Data were collected from the
official court records, monthly Juror panel sum-
maries, and from self-administered Juror
demographic data sheets. Information col-
lected Includes: members of the lury, their
votes, the final verdict, the type of Cas9, the
name of the judge, the amount of time taken
by the jury to arrive at a decision, juror's age,

Courts 99
occupation and years In residence In Oregon, dataset consists of 82 variables for civil cases
educational background, family Information, Including type of complaint, relationship be·
and past jury and trial Information. The data tween parties, relief sought and relief granted,
Include both Individual-level juror and aggre- size of file, and the historical Interest of the
gate jury case data. The data collection con- case. Fifty-two variables exist for the criminal
talns 199 variables and the data are In card- cases, Including type of crime, pleas, sen·
Image format with a logical record length of tences, appeals, size of file, and the historical
80 characters. The data Include Information Interest of the case. Class IV
on 6,657 jurors and 1,159 trials. There are
48,244 records with 7 records per case. Related Publication:
Class IV Hindus, M.S., T.M. Hammett, and B.M. Hobson
"The files of the Massachusetts Superior
Court, 1859-1959: An analysis and a plan
for action." Report of the Massachusetts
Judlclai Records Committee to the su-
Heinz, John P. and Edward O. Laumann preme Judicial Court, Boston, 1979.
Chicago lawyers survey, 1975
(ICPSR 8218)

The American Bar Foundation, the Russell Hirsch, Ronald L.


Sage Foundation, and the National Science National survey of lawyers' career
Foundation funded this study which contains satisfaction, 1984
Information collected in 1975 on attorneys In
Chicago. The purpose of this data collection (ICPSR 8975)
was to describe and analyze the social organi-
zation of the legal profession In Chicago. Sev- Summary: The purpose of this data collection
eral major aspects of the legal profession was to assess career satisfaction among
were investigated here: the organization of young lawyers throughout the United States.
lawyers' work; the social stratification within The questionnaire was designed to Include as
the locai (Chicago) Bar Association; prestige many factors as possible that might reason-
within the profession; lawyers' personal val- ably affect job satisfaction. The data collection
ues; career patterns and mobility; networks of Includes information on lawyers' job descrip-
association; and the "elites· within the profes- tions, educational background, psychological
sion. The data were collected based upon a characteristics, and basic demographics.
stratified sample with simple random selec- Other variables pertain to job setting, substan-
tion of elements within strata using Sullivan's tive law areas of the respondent, geographl·
Law Directory as a primary source, and as a cal area in which the law firm was located,
supplementary source, Martindale-Hubbell time spent each day on certain projects, and
Law Directory. The universe Is all attorneys In job stress. Class III
the city of Chicago who are non-retired and
not recent graduates from law :school (one Universe: Lawyers in the United States In
year) who had law offices. Interviews were 1984.
completed by 777 attorneys, anld the dataset
contains approximately 870 varJables. The Sampling: Three target groups were Identi-
logical record length of the data records is fied: lawyers 36 years of age and above who
1,221 characters. Class III were members of the American Bar Associa-
tion (ABA), all the remaining members of the
ABA excluding law students, and aii lawyers
In the nonmember files kept by the ABA. A
Hindus, Michael S., Theodore M. systematic random probability sample was
drawn to represent each of the three groups
Hammett, and Barbara M. Hobson of lawyers involved in the surve,'. The group
Massachusetts superior court flies, of young lawyers was oversampled.
1859-1959
Note: The principal inve~,igators supplied
(ICPSR 7776) these data to ICPSR in two formats, SAS and
SPSS system files. To facilitate use of the
A stratified sample of 1,968 civil cases and data, both files were converted to raw data by
1,422 criminal cases was drawn from the ICPSR. For the SAS format, control cards,
court files of two Massachusetts counties raw data, and a machine-readable codebook
, (one urban county and one rural county). The are provided. For the SPSS format, control

100 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


cards and raw data are available. Evan Note: These data are organIzed In a time-
though the same data are contained In the series cross-sectional design.
two raw data files, the total logical record
length varies In the files due to free field for- Extent of collection: 1 data file
mat In SPSS data and listed format In SAS
data Card Image data format

Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- rectangular fila structure


readable documentation + SPSS control 1,020 cases
cards + SAS control cards 260 variables
BO-unlt-Iong record
Card Image data format with SAS control 26 records per case
cards and SPSS control cards
Related Publication:
Part 1 Marvell, Thomas and Carlisle Moody
Raw data for SPSS program package "State appellate court adaptation to
rectangular file structure caseload growth: Final report." Washing.
2,281 cases ton, D.C.: National Institute of Justice,
431 variables 1986.
80-unlt-long record
12 records per case

Part 2 Nagel, Stuart S.


Raw data for SAS program package
rectangular file structure Federal court cases, 1962-1963
2,281 cases
431 variables (tCPSR 7245)
80-unlt-long record
12 records per case The data for this study were taken from both
civil and criminal cases for the fiscal years
1962-1963. The data include procedural, juris-
dictional, and other legal Information, includ·
Ing the disposition of each case. Requests
Marvell, Thomas and Carlisle Moody may be made for the criminal and/or civil
State appellate court adaptation to cases for one or both years. These are ap-
caseload Increase, 1968-1984: proximately 100,000 cards of data per fiscal
year with one card psr case. Class IV
[United States]
(ICPSR 8262) Related Publication:
Nagel, Stuart S.
This study was sponsored by the United States "Disparities In criminal procedure." UCLA
Department of Justice, Nation~ Inst~ute of Jus- Law Review 2 (1967), 1272.
~ce. The grCV'lt number Is 83-IJ·CX·4046.

Summary: This data collection examines the


impact of caseload pressures on both Inter- Nagel, Stuart S.
mediate appellate courts and supreme courts
for each state In the nation. The data describe Judicial charactel'lstics and Judicial
In detall the changes made by appellate decision-making study, 1955
courts and supply Information related to each
change. These changes include (1) adding (ICPSR 7084)
judges, law clerks, and staff attorneys, (2) ex-
panding or creating intermediate appellate The data consist of Information on the judges
courts, (3) reducing panel size, (4) using sum- serving on state and federal supreme courts
mary procedures, (5) curtailing opinion prac- In 1955. Background information was ob-
tices by deciding cases without opinion or un- tained from standard biographical sources; ju-
published and memo opinions, and (6) dicial decision measures were derived from
curtailing oral argument length. Class IV court records. The study contains non-nu-
meric codes. Variables measure party Identifi-
Universe: All state appellate courts In the cation, organizational affiliations, judicial deci-
United States. sion scores over a dozen separate areas and
the career history of judges. There are 313 r~-

Cour/stot
spondents, one record per respondent and United States having jurisdiction over juvenile
approximately 50 variables. Class IV matters.

Related Publications: Note: The "unit of count" varies across


Nagel, Stuart S. sources. Review of the data notes for each
"Political party affiliation and judges' deci- source Is necessary before attempting to com-
sions." American Political ScIence Review bine data across sources. Data contain non-
55 (1961), 843. numeric codes.
Nagel, Stuart S.
"Multiple correlations of judicial back- Extent of collection: 1 data file
grounds and decisions." Aorida State UnI-
versity Law Review 2 (1974), 258. Logical record length data format

rectangular file structure


3,087 cases
26 variables
National Center for Juvenile Justice 140-unlt·long record
Juvenile cou rt :statistics, 1982: 1 record per case
[United States]
Related Publication:
(ICPSR 8440) National Center for Juvenile Justice
"Juvenile court statistics: 1983." Washing-
These data describe the volume of juvenile ton, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Of-
cases disposed by courts In the 50 states, the fice, December 1985.
District of Columbia, and the territories of the
Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico during calen-
dar year 1982. The data contaln all avallable
summary information on children's cases dis- National Center for Juvenile Justice
posed In courts having Jurisdiction over juve-
nile matters, delinquency status, and depend- Juvenile court statistics, 1984:
ency/ neglect. The data are contalned in one [United States]
file and there are 3,085 cases, one record for
each case. The logical record length of the (ICPSR 8940)
file is 144 characters. Class IV
Summary: This data collection describes In
quantitative terms the volume of juvenile
cases disposed by courts having jurisdiction
over juvenile matters (delinquency, status and
National Center for Juvenile Justice dependency cases). This collection is the old-
Juvenile court statistics, 1993: est continuous source of information on the
[United States] processing of delinquent and dependent
youth done by juvenile courts, a record in-
(ICPSR 8656) augurated in 1926 to furnish an index of the
problems brought before the juvenile courts.
Summary: This data collection describes the Information Is provided on state, county, num-
volume of juvenile cases disposed of during ber of delinquency cases by sex, number of
calendar year 198310 courts having jurisdic- dependency cases by sex, and total number
tion over juvenile matters (delinquency and of cases. Class IV
dependency/neglect cases) in the 50 states,
the District of Columbia, and the territories of Universe: All delinquency and dependency/
the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico. This col· neglect cases disposed in 1984 by courts In
lection Is part of ths oldest continuous source the United States having jurisdiction over juve-
of infermatlon on the processing of delinquent nile matters.
and dependent youth done by juvenile courts,
a record inaugurated in 1926. It furnishes an Extent of collection: 1 data file
index of the general nature and extent of the
problems brought before the juvenile courts. Logical record length data format
Class IV

Universe: Delinquency and dependency/ne-


glect cases disposed in 1983 by courts in the

102 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


rectangular file structure and btrth date of Juveniles. court referral date,
3,093 cases major allegation, number of law vlolatlons l
26 variables number of prior referrals, detention status l
139-unlt-long record court action, and placement status. Class IV
1 record per case
Universe: Records from the state of Minne-
sota's courts with juvenile Jurisdiction.

National Center for Juvenile JUstice Extent of collection: 4 data files + machine-
readable documentation
Juvenile court statistics, 1985:
[United States1 Logical record length data format

(lCPSR 9297) Part 1


Minnesota juvenile court data, 1984
Summary: This data collection describes, In rectangular file structure
quantitative terms, the volume of Juvenile 17,777 cases
cases disposed by courts having jurisdiction 56 variables
over juvenile matters (delinquency, status, 154-unlt-long record
and dependency cases). Inaugurated In 1926 1 record per case
to furnish an Index of the problems brought
before the juvenile courts, this collection Is Part 2
the oldest continuous source of Information Minnesota juvenile court data, 1985
on the processing of delinquent arId depend- rectangular file structure
ent youth done by juvenile courts. Information 24,943 cases
is provided on state, county, number of delin- 56 variables
quency cases by sex, number of dependency 160-unlt-Iong record
cases by sex, and total number of cases. 1 record per case
Class IV
Part 3
Universe: All delinquency and depend- Minnesota juvenile court data, 1986
encylneglectcases disposed In 1985 by rectangular file structure
courts In the United States having jurisdiction 30,061 cases
over juvenile matters. 56 variables
160-unlt-long record
Extent of collection: 1 data file 1 record per case

logical record length data format Part 4


Minnesota juvenile court data, 1987
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
3,094 cases 32,584 cases
26 variables 56 variables
139-unlt-Ion9 record 164-unit-Iong record
1 record per case 1 record per case

National Center for JUVenile Justice National Center for Juvenile JUstice and
and Minnesota State Court Administration Missouri Division of Youth Services
Mlnnesnta Juvenile court records, Missouri juvenile court records,
1984-1987 1984·1987
(ICPSR 9447) (ICPSR 9448)

Summary: This data collection provides Infor- Summary: This data collection provides Infor-
mation on the disposition of juvenile court mation on each juvenile case disposed in the
cases (delinquency, status, and dependency) state of Missouri during calendar years 1984-
in the state of Minnesota. Data are included 1987. The Missouri Division of Youth Services
on all cases petitioned before the juvenile within the Department of Social Services be-
courts and supply Information on sex, race, gan collecting and disseminating juvenile
court data In 1975 as the result of legislation

Courts 103
passed by the state. Despite this legislation, Office of JUVenile Justice and Delinquency
no binding laws required the courts to submit Prevention
data to the Division of Youth Services. In "Updates on statistics." Washington, DC:
1980, such a law was passed, and data were U.S. Government Printing Office, n.d.
first collected In 1982 and 1983. The system
was automated In 1984, and these data are
now aVailable for public use. The data files
provide Information on Juveniles' progress National Center for Juvenile Justice
through the Juvenile Justice system from the
time of referral to Juvenile court to final dispo- and Nebraska Commission on Law
sition. Variables include sex, race, and birth Enforcement and Criminal Justice
date of the Juveniles, court referral date, ma-
jor allegation, number of law violations, num-
Nebraska Juvenile court records,
ber of prior referrals, detention status, jail 1975·1987
status, court orders, placement status, and fi- (ICPSR 8915)
nal court action. Class IV
Summary: Data In this collection provide infor-
Universe: Records from the state of Mis- mation on the disposition of JUVenile court
souri's courts with Juvenile Jurisdiction. cases In the state of Nebraska. The data files
contain Individual records on each delin-
Extent of collection: 4 data files + machine- quency, status offense, neglect, and depend-
readable documentation ency case disposed. Cases processed for-
mally (with a petition) and those handled
logical record length data format Informally (without a petition) are Included for
most courts. Records contain a county code,
Part 1 the youth's data of birth, age at referral, sex,
Missouri juvenile court data, 1984
date of referral, source of referral, number of
rectangular file structure prior referrals, care pending disposition, rea-
48,418 cases son for referral, manner of handling, date of
49 variables disposition, and case disposition. A case may
10S-unit-long record have Included more than one offense, but
1 record per case only the "most serious· offense (In the opinion
of court personnel) Is recorded. The majority
Part 2 of records also Include Information on diag-
Missouri juvenile court data, 1985 nostic services needed, educational attain-
rectangular file structure ment employment and school status, length
53,054 cases of re;ldence of child in county, child's living ar-
49 variables rangements at referral, marital status of natu-
1OS-unit-Iong record ral parents, combined family annual Income,
1 record per case
whether or not the youth was represented by
counsel, and the occupation of the primary
Part 3 parent or guardian. Class IV
Missouri juvenile court data, 1986
rectangular tile structure Universe: Records from the state of Ne-
56,847 cases braska's courts with juvenile jurisdiction.
49 variables
1OS-unit-long record Extent of collection: 13 data files + machine-
1 record per case readable documentation
Part 4 logical record length data format
Missouri juvenile court data, 1987
rectangular file structure Parts 1-13
57,963 cases Nebraska Juvenile court data, 1975-1985
49 variables rectangular file structure
1OS-unit-Iong record 4,454 to 6,856 cases per part
1 record per case 40 variables
80-unit-long record
Related Publications: 1 record per case
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention
"Juvenile court statistics." Washington,
DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, n.d.

104 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Related Publication: Yankelovlch, Skelly and White, Inc.
Nebraska Commission on Law Enforcement "The public Image of courts: A national sur-
and Criminal Justice vey of the general public, judges, lawyers
"Juvenile court report, 1975-1984: Ne- and community leaders· (complete re-
braska Clearinghouse #L2500S002, 1976- port), 1978.
1985.

Pennsylvania Sentencing Commission


National Center for State Courts
Pennsylvania sentencing data, 1977,
Public Image of courts, 1977: General 1980, 19B3
public data
(lCPSR8327)
(ICPSR 7703)
The Pennsylvania Sentencing Data have in-
Public Image of courts, 1977: Special formation on sentencing decisions for three
publics data years, 1977, 1980, and 1983. The 1977 data
are based on Individual 12 percent random
(ICPSR 7704) samples of sentences selected from each of
Pennsylvania's 67 counties. The data include
These surveys represent national studies of sentences Imposed for felonies and misde-
attitudes toward courts and justice. They meanors, excluding driving under the Influ-
sought to measure perceptions of and experi- ence. There are 2,907 cases In the 1977
ences with local, state and federal courts as data The 1980 data were collected in 23 of
well as general attitudes toward the admini- Pennsylvania's 67 counties. The sampling
stration of Justice and legal actors. The gen- strategy varied by county and a dascriptlon Is
eral objectives of the study were to: 1) deter- InclUded in the codebook. There are 2,023
mine the levels of public knowledge of courts; cases in the 1980 data. The 1983 data are
2) test reactions to situations which might or based on sentencing guideline forms submit-
might not prompt recourse to courts; 3) deter- ted to the Commission by sentencing judges.
mine the Incidence, nature and evaluations of There are 16,569 cases In the 1983 data
court experience; 4) describe and account for Variables in the three files include defendant's
evaluations of court performance; 5} indicate sex, race, age, prior record, offense charge,
attitudes toward legal actors; 6) indicate reac- sentences Imposed, weapon usage, victim in-
tions to alternative means of dispute resolu- formation, and socioeconomic status of the
tion. Two samples were drawn: a national defendant. The logical record length of the
sample of the general pubUc and a "special data is 80 characters. Class IV
publics" sample of judges, lawyers and com-
munity leaders. The 1,931 respondents in the
general public sample were Interviewed In
person by the National Consumer Field Staff
of Yankelovich, Skelly and White, Inc. The Rowland, C.K
1,111 respondents in the special publics sam- Federal district court civil decisions,
ple were interviewed by a special group of 1981-1987: Detroit, Houston, and
interviewers described as "retired business
executives specially trained to interview lead- Kansas City
ership groups." All interviews took place from (ICPSR 9367)
October to December 1977. There are 10 re-
cords per respondent In the general public SUMMARY: These data describe unpub-
sample and 9 per respondent in the special lished civil cases filed and terminated in the
publics sample. Class I three federal district courts of Detroit, Michi-
gan, Houston, Texas, and Kansas City, Mis-
Related Publications: souri, between 1981 and 1987. The data
Yankelovlch, Skelly and White, Inc. were collected to enabie researchers to meas-
"The public image of courts: Highlights of ure the relative influence of local legal environ-
a national survey of the general public, ments and politicized judicial appointments
judges, lawyers, and community leaders" on unpublished substantive and procedural
(a summary report), 1978. outcomes. Variables in the collection specify
the date a case was filed and terminated,
type of case filed, specific judgment and na-

Courts 105
ture of the decision, whether a monetary Spaeth, Harold J.
award was granted and, If so, the amount In-
volved. Information also Is Included on United States supreme court JudiCial
whether a government litigant was Involved, If database, 1953·1988 tenns
a Jury trial was requested and by whom, type
of attorney for plaintiff and defendant, tvpe (ICPSR 9422)
and number of motions filed (and by whom),
and outcome of appeal, If applicable. Summary: This data collection encompasses
CLASS IV all aspects of United States Supreme Court
decision-making from the beginning of the
Universe: Civil federal district court cases Warren Court In 1953 to the completion of the
filed and terminated In Houston, Detroit, and most recent term of the Rehnqulst Court. Vari-
Kansas City, between 1981 and 1987. ables in this database concern six distinct as-
pects of the Court's decisions. (1) Identifica-
Extent of collection: 1 data file tion variables Include case citation, docket
number, unit of analysis, and number of re-
logical record length data format cords per unit of analysis. (2) Background
variables offer Information on origin of case,
rectangular file structure source of case, reason for granting cert, par-
7,995 cases ties to the case, direction of the lower court's
37 variables decision, and manner in which the Court
60-unlt-long record takes jurisdiction. (3) Chronological variables
1 record per case cover date of oral argument, reargument
~ate, decision date, term of Court, chief jus-
tice, and natural court. (4) Substantive vari-
ables Include multiple legal prOVisions, author-
ity for decision, Issue, issue areas, and
Silverstein, Lee and Stuart S. Nagel direction of decision. (5) Outcome variables
supply information on form of decision. dispo-
American bar foundation: State sition of case, winning party, declaration of un-
criminal court cases, 1962 constitutionality, and multiple memorandum
(ICPSR 7272) decisions. (6) Voting and opinion variables
pertain to the vote in the case and the direc-
During the years 1963-1964 data were col- tion of the Individual Justices' votes. Class IV
lected on the 1962 criminal court cases for
the 50 states and the District of Columbia. A Note: This data collection contains both nu-
sample of cases from 194 counties was se- meric and alphanumeric fields.
lected and weighted to yield a national cross-
section of cases. The data Include demo- Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
graphic information on the defendant, state readable documentation
and county of trial, offense charged, sen-
tence, type of counsel, amount of bail, length Logical record length data format and SPSS
of time in jail ant,' other variables relating to export file
disposition of the case. Thore Is one card of
data for each of the 11,257 cases. Class IV Part 1
Court raw dala file
Related Publications: rectangular file structure
Nagel, Stuart S. 9,976 cases
"Disparities In criminal procedure." UCLA 188 variables
Law RevIew 14 (1967), 1272. 555-unit-long record
Nagel, Stuart S. 1 record per case
"The tipped scales of American justice."
Transaction: Social Science and Modern Part 2
Society 1966, 3. SPSS export file
Nagel, Stuart S. 80-unlt-long record
"Effects of alternative types of counsel on
criminal procedure." Indiana Law Journal Part 3
48 (1973), 404. Codebook
80-unit-long record

106 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Related Publication: Part 2
Spaeth, Harold J., and Jeffrey A. Segal 1989 data
"Decisional trends on the Warren and Bur- rectangular file structure
ger courts: Results from the supreme 22,676 cases
court data base project." Judicature 72 90 variables
(1989),103-107. 226-unlt-long record
1 record per case

Related Publication:
United States Sentencing Commission
Untted States Sentencing Commission Annual report, 1988.
Monitoring of federal criminal
sentences, 1987·1989
(lCPSR 9317) Untted States Sentencing Commission
Summary: Two databases of federal criminal Organizations convicted In federal
cases sentenced under the Sentencing criminal courts, 1998: [United States]
Guidelines and Policy Statements of the Sen-
tencing Reform Act of 1984 comprise this (ICPSR 9513)
data collection. The first database Includes all
cases received by the United States Sentenc- Summary: The data describe offense and
Ing Commission that had sentencing dates sentencing characteristics for organizations
between November 1, 1987 and December sentenced in federal district courts in 1988.
31, 1988 and were assessed as constitu- The purpose of the collection was to shape
tional. Constitutionality compares each case's the guidelines development process of the
sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to United States Sentencing Commission. The
provide uniformity in reporting the cases. The Commission's primary function is to Inform
cases are categorized as New Law, with all of- federal courts of sentencing policies and prac-
fenses occurring after the November 1, 1987 tices that include guidelines prescribing the
Guidelines, or as Mixed Law, with at least one appropriate form and severity of punishment
count occurring after the Guideline effective- for offenders convicted of federal r.rimes.
ness date and other counts prior to the Guide- Court-related variables include primary of-
lines. This database contains 6,129 New Law fense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain,
caseH and 94 Mixed Law cases. The second dates of disposition and sentencing, method
database Includes all cases received as of of determination of gUilt, number of counts
Novamber 8, 1989 that were sentenced be- pled and charged, and dates and types of
t1'leen January 1, 1989 and June 30, 19B9. It sentencing and restitution. Defendant organi·
contains 9,233 New Law and 127 Mixed Law zation variables Include ownership structure,
cases. Class IV number of owners and employees, highest
level of corporate knowledge of the criminal
Universe: All federal criminal court cases en- offense, highest level of corporate Indictment
tering the court system between 1987 and and conviction for participation in the criminal
1989. offense, annual revenue, equity and financial
status of the defendant organization, whether
Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine- it was a criminal organization, duration of
readable documentation criminal activity, and risk to national security.
Class IV
logical record length data format
Universe: An organizational defendants sen-
Part 1 tenced In federal district courts during 1988.
1987·1988 data
rectangular file structure Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
6,223 cases readable documentaticn
90 variables
236-unit-long record Logical record length data format
1 record per case
rectangUlar file structure
328 cases
80 variables
999-unit-long record
1 record per case

Courts 107
Vera Inst~ute of Justice, New Yorl< C~y nal Justice Agency, and CEP were used to ob-
tain Information on the prior and subsequent
New York City court employment arrests of the participants. Variables include
project evaluation study, 1976·1979 the age, sex, race and charges aga/nst the
defendant, previous training and work experi-
(ICPSR 7832) ence, satisfaction with CEP services, atten-
dance at counselling sessions, type of
The New York City Court Employment Project employment found, job attendance, and sub-
(CEP) Is an Independent corporation under sequent arrests and convictions. The collec-
contract to New York City's Human Re- tion contains 29,422 card Images with up to
sources Administration. CEP Was designed to 61 records for each of the 666 cases. Class IV
divert accused offenders from routine court
procedures of criminal prosecution, sentenc-
Ing and possible Incarceration, and to place
the~ Into jobs, training, or vocationally ori-
ented counseling services. Established In Yankelovich, Skelly, and Whtte, Inc.
1968, making it one of the oldest pretrial Inter- Survey of Judges on the role of courts
vention programs In the U.S., the ultimate aim
of CEP Is to change the incomegenerating ba- In American society, 1979
havior of its participants to reduce their sub- (ICPSR 7824)
sequent criminal activity. Eligible defendants
must agree to attend mandatory counselling The U.S. Department of Justice's Office for
sessions, devise and execute an Individual Improvements In the Administration of Justice
plan for securing training and employment, authorized this survey of judges on the role of
and avoid arrest and conviction during their courts In American society. The role of courts,
participation. Charges are dismissed by the rather than encompassing issues of policy-
court if, at the end of the six-month period, making, Is more narrowly focused on Issues
CEP counselors determine that the defendant of caseload management. Federal and state
has participated successfully. The Vera Insti- judges In five districts (Milwaukee/Eastern
tute of Justice, a nonprofit New York City pol- Wisconsin, South Carolina, Philadelphia!
icy research agency which originally organ- Eastern Pennsylvania, Albuquerque/New
Ized CEP, conducted its evaluation of CEP Mexico, and Los Angeles/Central California)
With funding from the National Institute of Law were questioned about the amount of time
Enforcement and Criminal Justice. The study they spent on routine judicial activities, the
compares a control group of non-CEP offend- time spent on certain types of cases, their
ers With an experimental group of CEP partici- techniques for reducing or more expeditiously
pants to assess the program's effectiveness handling heavy caseloads, and their sugges-
In helping offenders find and maintain employ- tions for extra-jUdicial dispute settlement proc-
ment or training and avoid criminal activity. esses that could serve as alternatives to
Data were collected on 666 SUbjects With 410 courts. Variables include judges' legal edu~a­
in the experimental group and 256 in the con- tion and experience, types of cases heard In
trol group. Three interviews were conducted the previous year, percent of time spent on
at six-month intervals with each subject, in- particular types of cases, characteristics of
itially to record self-reports about criminal ac- cases requiring excessive time, and tech-
tivity work experience, social service and niques for caseload management. The collec-
training needs, and then to maintain current tion contains approximately 250 variables for
information about their school, employment, each of the 104 respondents and has a logi-
Income arid court processing status. Files cal record length of 720. Class IV
from th~ NYC Police Department, the Crimi-

108 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Criminal justice system

Bureau of Justice Statistics, l3ureau of Justice Statistics,


U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of JUst/ce
Expenditure and employment data for Expenditure and employment data for
the criminal justice system: Annual the criminal Justice system [United
flies, 1971-1979 States]: Extract file, 1982
(ICPSR 7618) (ICPSR 8382)

The data were collected by the UnIted States These dala are taken from a specIal compila-
Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Jus- tion of dala and sources aVallable from the
tice Statistics. There is a separate dataset for Census Bureau's 1982 Census of Govern.
each fiscal year beginning In 1970-1971. ments. The census on governmental and pub-
Data were collected for all state and county lic employment provides data on expenditure
governments, all municipal governments with and employment, by function, of federal,
a population over 10,000, and a sample of state, and local governments (counties, cities,
municipal governments with a popUlation un- townships, school districts, and other special
der 10,000. The survey was accomplished us- districts). Information Is Included on total em-
Ing both field compilation and mail canvass. ployment, total police protection, police pro-
The variables include Identincation of each tection with arrest powers, other police protec-
government, number of full and part-time em· tion, Judlcial.legal employment, corrections
ployees, level of full- and part-time payroll, employment, total expenditures, police protec-
current expenditure, capital outlay, and Inter- tion expenditures, judicial-legal expenditures,
governmental expenditures for six sectors: po- and corrections expenditures. The data are
lice protection, Judicial, legal servicas and contalned in one file which has a logical re-
prosecution, public defense, corrections and cord length of 803 characters. There are 80
other. There are approximately 8,000 records variables and 321 cases. Class If
In each file. Data and documentation for fiscal
years 1971-1975 were prepared by the Cen-
ter for Advanced Computation, University of il-
linois, Urbana. Class 11 Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Related Publication: U.S. Department of justice
U.S. Department of Commerce. U.S. Bureau Expenditure and employment dats for
of the Census
"Expenditure and employment data for the the criminal Justice system [United
criminal Justice system." Washington. States]: Extract file, 1983
D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. (ICPSR 8455)
One publication for each ye:at.
Summary: These data were compiled from
the United States Census Bureau's 1983 sur-
veys of governmental finances and employ-
ment, which provide information on expendi-
ture and employment, by function, of the
federal, state, and local governments. Fed·
eral government financial data for this collec-
tion were obtained from those data contalnaci
in the Budget of the United States for the Rs·
cal Year 1985. State and large county and
city finance statistics were compiled by Cen-
sus Bureau representatives from official re-

Criminal justice system 109


ports and records. Federal government cIvil- and part·tlme payroll, current oxpendltures,
Ian employment data were gathered from re- capital outlay, and Inter·governmental expen·
cords malntainl3d by the United States Office ditures. Class 1/
of Personnel Management. A mall survey gen-
erated the data for state and local govern- Universe: All state, county, municipality, and
ments. Class 1/ township governments and university campus
police departments in the United States.
Sampling: There are 321 agencies Included
In this file which are extracted from the An- Sampling: Aprobability sampling was used in
nual Survey of Governments, 1983 Finance which the relative size of a government's
Statistics (ICPSR 8448) dataset. criminal justice expenditure as reported In the
1982 Census of Governments determined its
Universe: Federal, state, and local govern- probability of selection. Each sample case
ments (counties, cities, townships, school dis- was assigned a weight based on its prob·
tricts, and special districts). ability of selection. Included were 173 state,
county, municipality, and township govern·
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- ments serving populations of 10,000 or more,
readable documentation + SPSS control 8,100 general purpose state and local govern·
cards ments with populations under 10,000, and
1,000 special campus police departments
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with from universities and colleges.
SPSS control cards for each
Extent of collection: 3 data files + machine·
rectangular file structure readable documentation + SPSS control
321 cases cards for each collection
78 variables
782-unlt·long record OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with
13 records per case SPSS control cards for each

rectangular file structure


321 cases
Bureau of JUstice Statistics, 96 variables
480 to 489·unlt·long records
U.S. Department of Justice 8 records per case
Expenditure and employment data for
the criminal Justice system [United
states]: Extract file, 1984
Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S.
(ICPSR 9162) Department of Justice
Expenditure and employment data for Expenditure and employment data for
the criminal Justice system [United the criminal Justice system [United
states]: Extract file, 1985 States]: Extract file, 1987 .
(ICPSR 9161) (ICPSR 9396)

Expenditure and employment data for Summary: This file provides data on federal,
the criminal Justice system [United state, and local governmental expenditures
states]: Extract file, 1986 and employment for criminal justice activities
in the United States. Information is supplied
(ICPSR 9160) on police protection, judicial and 1El9a1 servo
ices, and correctional institutions and agen·
Summary: These data collections prElsent cies. Variables describing each of these crimi·
public expenditure and employment data per· naI Justice functions include number of and
taining to criminal justice activities in the payroll for full·time, part·time, and full·time
United States. Information on employment, equivalent employees, current total and gen·
payroll, and expenditures Is provided for po. eral expenditures, capital outlay, and intergov·
lice, courts, prosecutors' offices, and correc· ernmental expenditures. Class 1/
tions agencies. Specific variables include
Identification of each government, number of Universe: Local governments identified in the
full· and part·time employees, level of full· 1982 Census of Governments, modified by

110 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


the additlon or deletion of governments going tice. These types of data are needed because
Into or out of existence since 1982. the Justice Improvement Act of 1'[;,/9, as
amended, requires that block grants to each
Sampling: Larger governments were selecqed state be allocated between the state and local
with certalnty. Smaller governments were se- governments according to the ratio of state·to·
lected using probability sampling based on a local Justlce expenditure. Class II
ratio of governmental expenditures or Indebt-
edness to the total expenditures and Indebted- Universe: All state and county governments,
ness of all noncertalnty governments In speci- all municipal and township governments with
fied groups. 10,000 or more population, and special cam·
pus police of public universities and colleges
Note: The data contain alphabetic variables. In the United States.
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- Sampling: A probability sample In Which the
readable code book + SPSS Control Cards. chance of selection Is based on the relative
size of a government's expenditure for police
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with protection as provided In the 1982 Census of
SPSS control cards for each Governments.
rectangular file struoture Extent of collection: 2 data flies + machine·
321 cases readable documentation + SPSS Control
81 variables Cards
7OS-unlt-long record
10 records per case OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with
SPSS Control Cards for each
Part 1
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Individual units
rectangular file structure
U.S. Department of Justlce 7,328 cases
Expenditure and employment data for 182 variables
the criminal Justice system: ','75·unit·long record
15 records per case
Longitudinal file, 1971~1979
(ICPSR 7636) Part 2
Estimate file
In order to facilitate cross·temporal analysis, rectangular tile structure
the ICPSR has merged variables common to 366 cases
each yearly Employment and Expenditure file 167 variables
into a single dataset. Units for which there is 840·unlt·long record
no coverage in a partlcular year have miSSing 1 record per case
data codes padded for that year's variables.
For a description of survey coverage, vari-
ables and related publications. see ICPSR
7618. Class II Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice
National justice agency list, 1980
Bureau of Justice Statistics, (ICPSR 785S}
U.S. Department of Justice
The National Justice Agency Ust is a master
Justice assistance data for the United name and address file created and main·
States: Individual units and estimates, talned by the Bureau of the Census for the
1988 Bureau of Justice Statistics. The fila was first
created In 1970 and the Bureau of the Cen-
(ICPSR 9446) sus has continued to maintaln and expand
the file. The master file contalns Information
Summary: The purpose of this data collection for ten separate sectors: Prosecution and
was to collect civil and criminal justice expen· Civil Attorney Sector, Public Defender Sector,
diture and employment data for the Bureau of Law Enforcement Sector, Court Sector, Pro·
Justice Assistance (aJA). Department of Jus· bation and Parole Sector, Juvenile Correc·

Criminal justice system 111


-----~-I

tlons Sector, Local Adult Corrections Sector, Part 4 I


State Adult Corrections Secter, Other Justice Probation and parole agencies
Agencies Sector, and Federal and Indian There are 3,575 agencies listed. Variables
Tribal Sector. The ICPSR has separated the Include type of system, agency client
master file Into ten subfiles, corresponding to case/oad, agency employment size and
the ten sectors In the master file. Every file funding code. There are 31 variables In this
has variables containing the names and ad· file.
dresses of agencies In that sector and Infor·
matlon relevant only to the agencies within PartS
the secter. The original survey of criminal Jus. "Other" agencies
tlce agencies was conducted In January of There are 1,788 agencies listed. Variables
1970 by the U.S. Bureau of the Census. Each Include type of services and agency
county In the United States and each munlcl· employment size. There are 37 variables In
pallty and township with a 1960 population of this file.
1,000 or more persons was surveyed to Iden·
tify the names and addresses of the criminal Part6
Justice agencies and Institutions controlled by local jails
local government. The survey was conducted There are 3,495 local Jails listed. Variables
by mall canvass for the governmental units Include sex of Inmates, number of female
mentioned above. In addition to th@ mall sur· Inmates, Inmate population and funding code.
VfJI, the Burl8au of the Census collected Infor· There are 31 variables In this file.
matlon on stw·)-Ieve/ governments and coun·
ties with a 1960 population of 500,000 or Part 7
more and for cities with a 1960 population of Prosecution and civil attorney agencies
300,000 or more through In-house research There are 8,562 agencies listed. Variables
methods. The reference information Included Include type of agency, types of cases
a variety of published government documenLl.I prosecuted, agency employment size,
such as budget statements, organization number of attorneys, and funding code. There
manuals, and sta1e, county, and municipal di- are 31 variables In this file.
rectories. Class II
Part 8
Part 1 Federal and Indian tribal agencies
Courts There are 1,215 agencies listed. Variables
There are 10,000 courts listed. In addition, IncIud a type of justice sector, employment
State government agencies are also Included. size, and funding code. There are 28
Variables Include court struc!Ure, type of variables In this file.
Jurisdiction the court has, and the location of
court records. This file has 28 variables and Part 9
20,002 records, each with a log!ca1 record length law enforcement agencies
of 205. There are 19,298 agencies listed. Variables
Include type of agency, employment size, and
Part 2 number of sworn police. There are 30
State adult correctional facilities variables In this file.
There are 791 facilities listed. Variables
include type of institution, agency Part 10
employment size, sex of Inmates and funding Juvenile and correctional facilities
code. There are 31 variables In this file. There are 1,019 facilitIes listed. Variables
Include type of facility, sex of residents,
Part 3 resident population, and employment size.
Public defender agencies There are 30 varIables In this Iile.
There are 746 agencies listed. Variables
Include type of agency, type of cases Related Publication:
handled, agency employment size and Bureau of Justice Statistics
funding code. There are 31 variables In this "Justice agencies In the United States"
file. (surrmary report). Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Government Printing Office, 1980.

112 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Bureau 01 Justice Statistics, Extent of collection: 1 data llIe
U.S. Department of Justice
logical record length data format
National Justice agency list, 1985
rectangular file structure
(ICPSR 8489) 59,975 cases
39 variables
Summary: The National Justice Agency Ust, 360.unlt·long record
1985 Is a master name and address file cre- 1 record per case
ated and maintained by the Bureau of the
Census for the Bureau of JUstice Statistics. Related Publication:
The file contains Information for the Prosecu· Bureau of Justice Statistics
tlon and Civil Attorney Section, Public De· "Justice agencIes In The United States"
fender Section, law Enforcement Section, (summary report). Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Court Section, Probation and Parole Section, Government Printing Office, 1980.
Juvenile Corrections Section, Local Adult Cor-
rections Section, Other Justice Section, and
Federal and Indian Tribal Section. Class IV

UnIverse: All criminal Justice agencies In the Bureau of Justice Statlsllcs,


United States. U.S. Department of Justice
Extent of collection; 1 data file National justice agency list, 1987
(lepSR 9482)
logical record length data format
Summary: The National Justice Agency Ust,
rectangular file structure 1987 Is a master name and address file cre-
60,826 cases ated and maintained by the Bureau of the
38 variables Census for the Bureau of Justlce Statistics.
360·unit·long record The fite contains Information for the following
1 record per case topics: Public Defenders, Law Enforcement,
Courts, Probation Enforcement, Probation
and Parole, Juvenile Corrections, Local Adult
Corrections, State Adult Corrections, Federal
Bureau of Justice StatisticS, Adult Corrections, and Other Justice Agen-
U.S. Department of Justice cies. Variables Include name of the agency,
address, state and region Identification, tele-
National Justice agency list, 1986 phone number, FIPS code. population, total
workload, and number of professional and to-
(ICPSR 8692) tal employees. Class IV
Summary: This list has been updated by add- Universe: All criminal Justice agencies In the
Ing various surveys conducted In the past United States.
three years. They are: the 1984 State Correc·
tional Facilities Survey, the 1986 JUVenile De- Extent of collection: 1 data file
tention and Correctional Facilities SUrvey, the
1986 Directory Survey of law Enforcement logical record length data format
Agencies, and the 1986 Dlractory Survey of
General Jurisdiction Courts. The prison sec- rectangular fife structure
tor has also been updated using the recently 61 ,408 cases
published American Correctional Association 40 variables
DlrectOl'Y. The populations section has been 360·unlt·long record
updated by replacing the old populations with 1 record per case
1984 populations for cities and townships and
1985 estimated populatlons for the remaining Related Publication:
agencies. Class IV Bureau of Justice Statistics
"Justice agencies In the United States" (sum-
Universe: All criminal Justice agencies In the mary report). WashIngton, DC: U.S. Govern-
United States. ment Printing Office, 1980.
Note: This collection Is a complete update to
ICPSR 7858 and 8489.

Criminal justice system 113


------------------------------------

Bureau of Justice Statistics, American Justice Inst~ute


u.s. Department of Justice Systems and training requirements for
Survey of expenditures for criminal criminal Justice participants (Project
Justice agencies [United States]: STAR), 1971·1974: California,
Full file and extract file, 1985 Michigan, New Jersey, Texas
(ICPS8 8650) (ICPSR 8392)

Summary: This dataset presents public ex- Project STAR was designed to collect Infor-
penditure and employment data on criminal mation about the various roles of operational
justice activities In the United States. Informa- criminal justice personnel In order to anslst In
tion on employment, payroll, and expendi- the design of educational and training pro-
tures Is provided for police, courts, prosecu- grams for these personnel. Data were col-
tors' offices, and corrections agencies. lected from a two-part questionnaire adminis-
Specific variables are Identification of each tered to criminal justice personnel In four
government, number of full- and part-time em- state~: California, Michigan, New ,Jersey and
ployees, level of full- and part-time payroll, Texas. The first part of the questionnaire con-
current expenditures, capital outlay, and Inter- tains general Information Including personal,
governmental expenditures. Class II attitUdinal, and opinion Items as well as ques-
tions concerning the goals of the criminal jus-
Universe: All state, county, municipality, and tice system. The second part consists of 97
township governments and university campus situations which the respondent was asked to
police departments In the United States. rank using a five-part scale. The situations
deal with the roles of police officers, prosecut-
Sampling: Probability sampling In which the Ing attorneys, defense attorneys, Judges, pro-
relative size of a government's criminal justice bation officers, correctional officers and pa-
expenditure as reported in the 1982 Census role officers. The data are organized In four
of Governments determines Its probability of flies by state. The logical record length Is
selection. Each sample case was assigned a 3,912 characters for aU cases. Class IV
weight based on its probability of selection. In-
cluded were 173 state, county, municipality,
and township governments serving popula-
tions of 10,000 or more, 8,100 general pur-
pose state and local governments with popu- Bureau of Social Science Research, Inc.
lations under 10,000, and 1,000 special National manpower survey, 1973·1976
campus police departments from universities
and colleges. (ICPSR 7675)

Extent of collection: 2 data tiles + machine- The National Manpower Sur.vey was under-
readable documentation + SPSS control taken in 1974 to assess the adequacy of exist-
cards Ing fedeial, state and local training and educa-
tion (T and E) programs to meet both current
OSIRIS and card Irnage data formats, with personnel needs In various law
SPSS control cards for each enforcement and criminal justice functions
and operations. In order to assess the future
Part 1 adequacy of T and E resources, the study In-
Full tended to project futlJre personnel and train-
rectangular tile structure Ing needs by occupation, In relation to antici-
7,276 cases pated availability of qualified personnel. It
166 variables also sought to establish "needs priorities· as a
1, 153-unit-long record basis for future training and ClCadamlc assis-
19 records per case tance programs to be funded by the Bureau
of Justice Statistics (BJS). The study design
Part 2 systematically covers the personnel needs In
Estimate all state and local government agencies
rectangular file structure which are part of the law enforcement and
366 cases criminal justice system. Sectors within the sys-
143 variables tem Include: 1) law enforcement sector, con-
691-unit-long record sisting of police departments and sheriffs
11 records per case agencies ranging In size from one person con-
stabularies to largo city departments employ-

114 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


ing 20,000 or more personnel; 2) COI'T9cUonai information on crime clearance rates, arrests,
soota, including both adult and Juvenile cor- and sentences. Class IV
rectionallnstitutions and agencies; 3) Judicial
process sector Including: a wide range of Universe: Bank robberies in the 60 states,
courts with varying Jurisdictions and scopes, 1970-1976.
district attorneys' or prosecutors' offices and
public defenders' offices. The Bureau of So- Sampling: The data collection is a pooled
cial Science Research was respsonsible for cross-sectional time·serles of bank robberies
the acquisition and assessment of existing in 60 states over a period of 6 years (1970-
statistical data as well as the design and exe- 1976), resulting in 300 observations.
cution of systematic mall surveys of agencies,
officials and employees within the lawen- Extent of collection: 1 data file
forcemanVcr/minal justice system. Nine na-
tionwide surveys were directed to executives Card Image data format
in criminal justice agencies and two addiUonal
surveys were sent to general and appellate ju- rectangular file structure
risdiction courts. The surveys attempted to as- 300 cases
sess manpower problems, in-service training 66 variables
content, and attitudes toward various Issues 80-unit-long record
such as plea bargainIng and team policing. 7 records per case
The data contaIn approxImately 358 variables
varyIng from 200 to 2,000 cases per file, and Related Publication:
a total of 98,924 acrO$S all 11 surveys. Class II Gou!d, L.C., G.M. Camp, and J.K. Peck
"Economic and sociological theories of de-
terrence, motivation, and criminal opportu-
nIty: A regression analysis of bank robbery
and other property crimes" (unpublished
Camp, George M. and LeRoy Gould report). South Salem, NY: Criminal Justice
Influencll! of sanctions and Institute, Inc., 1983.
opportunities on rates of bank
robbery, 1970·1975: [United States}
(ICPSR 8260) Center for Action Research and Social
Science Education Consortium
This study was sponsored by the United States
Depcvtment of Justice, Nat/ana/Institute of Jus- Law-related education evaluation
tice. The grant number Is 79-NI-AX-0117. project [United states], 1979-1984
Summary: This study was designed to ex- (ICPSR 8406)
plaln variations in crimtl rates and to examine
the deterrent effects of sanctions by combin- Data were gathered for this evaluation to as-
ing the effects of economic and sociological sess the degree of awareness of and receptIv-
independent variables. The study concen· ity to law·reiated education among profes-
trated primarily on bank robberies, but It also sional groups and primary and secondary
examined burglaries and other kinds of rob- students. In 1981 and 1982, questionnaires
beries over the period 1970-1975. The re- were mailed to a sample of professionals In
search design combined variables from three certain educational organizations as well as
different perspectives: economic, sociological, to school principals, jwenile justice person-
and opportunity, in order to examine the ef· nel, and law school deans. The respondents
fects of sanctions on robberies. Economic were asked about their knowledge of and in·
variables included certainty, severity, and im- terest In law-related educational programs.
mediacy of criminal sanctions. Sociological Primary and secondary school students were
variables Included urbanization, population selected for an impact evaluation of the law-
mobility, rigidity of class structure, and eco· related education programs. Questionnalres
nomic means ends discontinuities. Opportu- were administered to students during aca-
nity variables consisted of exposure, guardi· demic years 1982·83 and 1983-84, before
anshIp, and attractiveness of object. Other and after taking law-related education
variables examined were: 1) demographic in- courses. The data are organIzed in four files,
formation, Including population changes and two files from the mailout surveys and two
growth, percent nonwhite, Income, and unem- from the student impact questionnaires. The
ployment, 2) characteristics of banks, bank logical record length for the mailed surveys is
robberies, and assets, and 3) criminal justice 73 characters, with 1,790 cases in 1981 and

Criminal justice system 115


1,200 cases In 1982. The student file for sponses of criminal justice employees to af-
1982-83 has 1,348 cases and a logical record firmative action within criminal justice agen-
length of 567, the file for 1983-84 has 1,120 cies. Information Is provided on employees'
cases and a logical record length of 484. (1) general mood, (2) attitudes across various
Class IV attributes, such as race, sex, rank, education,
and length of service, and (3) demographic
characteristics including age, sex, race, edu-
catlonallevel, parents' occupations, and living
Chabotar, Kent arrangements. The use of criminal justice em-
ployees as the units of analysis provides atti-
National assessment of criminal tudinal and perceptual data In assessing af-
justice needs, 1983: [United States] firmative action programs within each agency.
Variables Include reasons for becoming a
(lCPSR 8362) criminal Justice employee, attitudes toward af-
firmative action status In general, and atti-
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States tudes about affirmative a.ction in criminal jus-
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- tice settings. Class IV
tice. The grant number is 8O-IJ·CX-0001.
Universe: Employees of criminal Justice agen-
Summary: In 1983, the National Institute of cies In the United States.
Justice (NIJ) sponsored a survey by Abt Asso-
ciates that was designed to Identify the high- Sampling: A sample of 19 agencies was
est priority needs for groups were surveyed: taken from over 200 criminal justice organiza-
judges and trial court administrators, (N=234); tions nationwide. Employees within those 19
corrections officials, (N=275); public defend- agencies were then randomly sampled.
ers, (N=78); police, (N=403); prosecutors,
(N=273); and probation/parole officials, Note: Two versions of the questionnaire were
(N=184). Over 1,400 persons responded to used, one for employees who worked for cor-
the mail survey, or 61 percent of those sur- rectional agencies, another slightly different
veyed. Selected respondents were then con- version for employees of law enforcement
tacted by telephone in order to clarify their ex- agencies. The substantive content of the
pressed problems and needs. The codebook questions was not altered.
includes the mailed questionnaire sent to
each of the six groups In the study as well as Extent of collection: 1 data file
a copy of the telephone interview guide. Vari-
ables In this study Include background infor- Card Image data format
mation on the respondents and their particu-
lar agencies, financial resources available to rectangular file structure
the agency, and technical assistance, re- 905 cases
search, and initiative programs used by the 165 variables
agency. There are six files In this dataset, all 80-unit-long record
of which have logical record lengths of 80 17 records per case
characters. Class IV
Related Publications:
Feyerllerm, William
"Analysis of Individual responses to affirm·
ative action Issues" (final report). Washing-
Feyerherm, William H. ton, DC: National Institute of Justice, 1984.
IndivIdual responses to afflnnatlve Feyerherm, William
action Issues In criminal Justice "Assessment of a!firmative action In crimi-
nal justice agencies: An executive sum-
agencies, 1981: [United States] mary." Washington, DC: National Institute
(ICPSR 9311) of Justice, '1984.

This study was sponsored by the United States


Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number is 81-IJ·CX·KOO3.

Summary: These data, which are part of a


larger study underta/(en by the University of
Wisconsin·Milwaukee, evaluate the re-

116 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Forst, Brian and William Rhodes Extent of collection: 6 data files + SPSS con-
trol cards
Six-year follow-up study on career
criminals, 1970-1976: [United States] logical record length data format with SPSS
control cards
(ICPSR 8648)
Part 1
Tlis study was sponsored by the United statE:lS PSI data
Depmment of Justice, Natlon~ Institute of Jus- rectangular file structure
tice. The gra1t number Is JYFRP-81-C0126. 1,567 cases
311 variables
Summary: The major objective of the Six- 653-unit-long record
year Follow-up Study on Career Criminals 1 record per case
was to provide data describing the effects of
sentencing decisions on the behavior of ca- Part 2
reer criminals. A second purpose was to de- Parole data
velop programs to target career offenders at rectangular file structure
the time of sentencing who were likely to com- 1,762 cases
mit crimes In the future and Incarcerate them 160 variables
accordingly. The data collection Includes de- 296-unit-long record
talled demographic background and complete 1 record per case
prior and follow-up criminal records for each
selected offender. There are two types of Part 3
data sets in the stWy, the PSI data set based PSI rap sheet
on pre-sentence InvestigaUon (PSI) reports, hierarchical file structure
and the Parole data set based on Parole 39·unit-long record
Commission records. The PSI data set de-
scribes each offender's demographic back- Part 4
ground, criminal history, and court entry/exit Parole rap sheet
history. The Parole data set contains informa- hierarchical file structure
tion about the offender's background charac- 39-unit-long record
teristics, prior records of arrests, convictions,
dispositions and sentences, and follow-up re- PartS
cords for a period of six years. Arrests are de- PSI-rap link
scribed in terms of arrest date. offense rectangular file structure
charge, disposition, result of sentence, and 1,318 cases
months incarcerated. Class IV 2 variables
8-unlt-long record
Universe: Defendants convicted of federal of- 1 record per case
fenses in 1969-1970 and sentenced to up to
a year in prison, given probation, or fined, and Part 6
federal offenders released from prison during Parole-rap link
the first six months of 1970. rectangular file structure
659 cases
Note: The PSI Rap Sheet and Parole Rap 2 variables
Sheet files are structured hierarchically with a 12-unit-long record
varying number of records per offender. The 1 record per case
first physical record corresponding to an of-
fender is an identification record containing 7 Related Publication:
variables. Each of the subsequent records for Rhodes, William, Herbert Tyson, James
that offender represents a single arrest. The Weekly, Catherine Conly, and Gustave Powell
maximum number of arrest records per of- "Developing criteria for identifying career
fender is 31 for the PSI Rap Sheet file and 53 criminals." Washington, D.C.: Institute for
for the Parole Rap sheet file. There are 17 Law and Social Research, 1982.
variables per arrest record. The PSI Rap
Sheet file contains a total of 6,430 records
representing 1,320 offenders. The Parole
Rap Sheet file has 7,257 records repre-
senting 659 offenders. The PSI data files and
Parole data files can be linked to the corre-
sponding Rap Sheet files using the appropri-
ate Unk file.

Criminal justice system 117


Haklm, Simon Part 2
1970/1980 file
Impact of casino gambling on crime In rectangUlar file structure
the Atlantic City region, 1970-1984 144 cases
25 variables
(ICPSR 9237) 208·unit-long record
1 record per case
T1is study was sponsored by 1he United States
Depa1ment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- Related Publication:
tice. The grant number Is 85-IJ·CX-P394. Hakim, S.
"The impact of casino gambling on crime
Summary: The aim of this data collection was in Atlantic City and its region." Unpub-
to gauge the Impact of legalized casino gam- lished final report submitted to the Na-
bling on the level and spatial distribution of tional Institute of Justice, Washington, DC,
crime In the Atlantic City region by comparing 1985.
crime rates before and after the introduction
of this type of gambling in the area. Data for
the years 1972 through 1984 wera coli ected
from various New Jersey state publications
for 64 localities and Include Information on McDonald, William F., Lonnie A. Athens,
population size and density, population char- and Thomas J. Minton
acteristics of race, age, per capita Income,
education and home ownership, real estate Repeat offender laws In the United
values, number of police employees and po- states: Forms, uses, and perceived
lice expenditures, total city expenditure, and value, 1983
number of burglaries, larcenies, robberies
and vehicle thefts. Spatial variables include (ICPSR 9328)
population attributes standardized by land
area in square miles, and measures of acces- This study was sponsored by the United States
sibility, location, and distance from Atlantic Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
City. For the 1970/1980 data file, additional tice. The grant number is 83-IJ-CX-0023.
variables pertaining to population charac-
teristics were created from census data to Summary: This survey of prosecutors, de-
match economic and crime attributes found in fense attorneys, and judges In jurisdictions
the 1972-1984 data Data on eight additional with sentence enhancement statutes for reo
locations are avallab!e in the 1970/1980 file. peat offenders collected information about the
Class iV characteristics of the laws and the views of
criminal justice professionals regarding the
Universe: Cities and towns in Atlantic County, falrness, effectiveness, and practice of the
Cape May County, and Ocean County in New laws. The jurisdiction file includes variables
Jerse,'. such as jurisdiction size, number of provisions
in the IaN, number of felony cases handled
Sampling: All cities and towns in Atlantic, under the law per year, number of defendants
Cape May, and Ocean counties In New Jer- sentenced as repeat offenders, frequency of
sey for which 1970 and 1980 census data charging and sentencing under the law, and
were available (72 localities). minimum and maximum sentences specified
in the statutes. The three surveys of practitio-
Extent of collection: 2 data files ners contain data related to their familiarity
with the laws, descriptions of recent cases,
Logical record length data format and satisfaction with the new statutes.
Class IV
Part 1
1972-1984 file Universe: General recidivist laws In effect dur-
rectangular file structure ing 1983 in the United States.
832 cases
20 variables Sampling: Within each of the 49 jurisdictions
188-unit-long record with general repeat offender laws, two local ju-
1 record per case risdictions were randomly selected: one from
localities with populations between 50,000
and 250,000 in 1980, and the other from
larger localities. Criminal justice professionals
who were familiar with the repeat offender

118 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


laws were selected from a convenience sam- sored programs. Two types of data elements
ple of prosecutors, defense attorneys, and are used to describe the projects In this file:
Judges.
1. Basic data. These elements Include the ti-
Extent of collection: 4 data files tle of the grant, Information regarding the loca-
tion of the grantee and the project, critical
Card Image data format funding dates, the government level and type
of grantee, financial data, the name of the pro-
Part 1 ject director, and Indication of the availability
Prosecutors survey of reports, and appropriate identification
rectangular file structure numbers.
179 cases
57 variables 2. Program descriptors. These elements.
80-unit-long record which form the program classification system,
1 record per case describe the key characteristics of the pro-
gram-its subject, its primary and secondary
Part 2 activity, whether it affects a juvenile or adult
Defense attorneys survey problem, and what specific crimes, clients,
rectangular file structure staff, program strategies, agencies, equip"
96 cases ment or research methods are to be used or
57 variables affected by the project. There are approxi-
80-unlt-long record mately 17,000 records In the data file with a
1 record per case lotal of 34 variables. Each record has a logi-
cal record length of 2,154 characters. Class IV
Part 3
Judges survey
rectangular file structure
89 cases Wise, Lois Recascino
57 variables
80-unlt-long record Factors Influencing the quality and
1 record per case utility of government-sponsored
Part 4 criminal Justice research In the United
Jurisdiction data States, 1975-1986
rectangular file structure (ICPSR 9089)
96 cases
57 variables This study was sponsored by the United
80-unit-long record States Department of Justice, Nationallnstl-
1 record per case tute of Justice. The grant numbers are 88·NIJ-
84/OJP-86-M-275.
Related Publication:
McDonald, W.F., LA. Athens, and T.J. Minton Summary: This data collection examines the
"Repeat offender laws in the United effect of organizational environment and fund-
States: Their use and perceived value" ing level on t/1l) utility of criminal Justice re-
(executive summary). Washington, DC: search projeo'is sponsored by the National In-
Georgetown University Law Center, 1985. stitute of Justice (NIJ). The data represent a
unique source of information on factors that
influence the quality and utility of criminal Jus-
tice research. Variables describing the re-
Office of Justice Assistance, Research, search grants include NIJ office responsible
and Statistics for monitoring the grant (e.g., courts, police,
corrections, etc.), organization type receiving
Law enforcement assistance the grant (academic or nonacademic), type of
administration profile data, [1968-1978] data (collected originally, existing, merged),
and priority area (crime, victims, parole, po-
(ICPSR 8075) lice). The studies are also classified by: (1)
sampling method employed, (2) presentation
The Office of Justice Programs File (PRO- style, (3) statistical analysis employed, (4)
FILE) System was designed for the auto- type of research design, (5) number of obser-
mated storage and retrieval of information vation points, and (6) unit of analysis. Addi-
describing Office of Justice Programs spon- tional variables provided Include whether

Criminal justice system 119


there Was a copy of the study report In the Na- Zedlewskl, Edwin W.
tional Criminal Justice Archive, whether the
study contained recommendations for policy Public and private resources In public
or practice, and whether the project was com- safety [United States]: Metropolitan
pleted on time. The data file provides two indi- area panel data, 1977 and 1982
ces-one that represents quality and one that
represents utility. Each measure Is generated (ICPSR 8988)
from a combination of variables In the dataset.
Class IV This study was sponsored by the United
States Department of Justice, Natlonallnsti-
Universe: Research grants In the United tute of Justice.
States sponsored by the National Institute of
Justice. Summary: This data collection provides a se-
ries of measures relating to public safety for
Sampling: Random sample. all SMSAs in the United States at two time pe-
riods. Variables Include: municipal employ-
Note: These data contain alphabetic codes. ment (e.g., number of municipal employees,
number of police employees, police payrolls,
Extent of collection: 1 data file municipal employees per 10,000 Inhabitants),
municipal revenue (total debt, property taxes,
Logical record length data format utility revenues, income taxes). nonmunicipal
employment (retail services, mining services,
rectangular file structure construction services finance services), crime
75 cases rates (murder, robbery. auto theft, rape), labor
52 variables force and unemployment, property value, and
93-unlt-long record other miscellaneous topics. Class IV
1 record per case
Universe: All standard Metropolitan Statistical
Related Publication: Areas In the United States as defined by the
Wise, LR. Office of Management and Budget for the
"Academics and entrepreneurs: Factors af- years 1977 and 1982.
fecting the quality and utility of govern-
ment-sponsored research.· Knowledge: Extent of collection: 1 data file + SAS control
Creation, Diffusion, and Utilization 1:1 cards
(forthcoming).
logical record length data format

rectangular file structure


366 cases
343 variables
2,621-unit-long record
1 record per case

120 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Delinquency
Bachman, Jerald G., Uoyd D. Johnston, the percentage distributions of all variables as
and Patrick M. O'Malley well as a year-to·year cross reference table
organized by item number, question number,
Monitoring the future: A continuing and variable number lor 1976·1981, and by
study of the lifestyles and values of item number alone for 1982. Class"
youth
Monitoring the future: A continuing
The Monitoring the Future annual surveys are study of the lifestyles and values of
designed to explore changes In many Impor-
tant values, behaviors, and lifestyle orienta-
youth, 1976
tions of contemporary American youth. Two (iCPSR 7927)
general types ot tasks may be distinguished.
The first is to provide a systematic and accU- The 1976 sample of public and private high
rate description of the youth population of in- school students includes a total of 16,677
terest In a given year, and to qu~tlfy the di- respondents.
rection and rate of change occurring over
time. The second task, more analytic than de- Monitoring the future: A continuing
scriptive, involves the explanation of the rela- study of the lifestyles and values of
tionships and trends observed. Each year, a
large, nationally representative sample of youth,1977
high school seniors in the U.S. Is asked to re- (lCPSR 7928)
spond to approximately 100 drug use and
demographic questions as well as an aver- The 1977 nationally representative sample of
age of 200 additional questions on a variety public and private high school students in-
of subjects, including attitudes toward govern- etudes a total of 18,436 respondents. This is
ment, social instiMions, race relations, chang- the third survey In this series.
ing roles for women, educational aspirations,
and occupational alms as wall as marital and Monitoring the future: A continuing
family plans. There are more than 1,300 vari-
ables in all. Each year, the total sample is di- study of the lifestyles and values of
vided Into 5 subsamples and each subsample youth,1978
Is administered a different form of the ques- (ICPSR 7929)
tionnaire, although all the respondents an-
swer the "core" drug and demographic ques-
The 1978 sample Includes a total of 18,924
tions. Each of the questionnaires generates a respondents. This is the fourth survey of the
corresponding data file. In addition, there is a
series.
sixth file which contains only the "core" vari-
ables present in all 5 forms. Each of the sub-
samples contains approximately 3,500 re- Monitoring the future: A continuing
spondents. Full details on the research study of the lifestyles and values of
design and procedures, sampling methodol- youth,1979
0tJf content areas and questionnaire design
as ~ell as percentage distributions by respon- (tCPSR 7930)
dent's sex, race, region, college plans, and
drug use appear In the annual ISR volumes The fifth survey in the series contains re-
Monitoring the Future: Questionnaire Re- sponses from 16,662 students tram the na-
sponses from the Nation's High School Sen- tionally representative sample of public and
Iors. There are 6 OSIRIS dictionaries, 6 da- private high school students.
tasets, and 6 data maps available per year,
corresponding to the 6 forms noted above.
Data are available In OSIRIS and card.image
formats. A machine-readable codebook gives

Delinquency 121
Monitoring the future: A continuing Johnston, L.D., J.G. Bachman, and P.M.
study of the lifestyles and values of O'Malley
youth,1980 "Student drug use, attitudes, and beliefs:
National trends, 1975-1981." DHHS Publi-
(ICPSR 7900) cation No. ADM 83-1260, 1982.

In the 1980 wave, 16,524 students were Monitoring the future: A continuing
questioned. study of the lifestyles and values of
youth,1985
Monitoring the future: A continuing
study of the lifestyles and values of (ICPSR 8546)
youth,1981
Summary: The eleventh annual survey In the
(ICPSR 9013) Monitoring the Future series continues that
series' exploration of changes in many Impor-
This is the seventh In the continuing series of tant values, behaviors, and lifestyle orienta-
annual surveys of high school seniors In the tions of contemporary American youth. A na-
U.S. The 1981 nationally representative sam- tionally representative sample of high school
ple of public and private high school students seniors was asked to respond to a set of drug
includes a total of 18,267 respondents. use and demographic questions. In addition
to these "core" questions, which were In-
Monitoring the future: A continuing cluded In all five questionnaire forms, each of
study of the lifestyles and values of the forms sought student response to ques-
tions on certain other subjects. These in-
youth,1982 cluded attitudes toward government, social In-
(ICPSR 9045) stitutions, race relations, changing roles for
women, educational aspirations, occupational
The eighth survey questioned 18,348 public alms, and family plans. Class II
and private high school students from a na-
tionally representative sample. Universe: High school seniors in the contigu-
ous United States.
Monitoring the future: A continuing
study of the lifestyles and values of Sampling: National multistage sample.
youth,1983 Extent of collection: 6 data files + machlne-
(ICPSR 8387) readable documentation + SPSS control
cards
Th.e 1983 sample of public and private high
school students include 16,947 respondents. OSIRIS and card image data formats, with
SPSS control cards for each
Monitoring the future: A continuing
Part 1
study of the lifestyles and values of Form 1 questionnaire
youth,1984 rectangular file structure
(ICPSR 8388) 3,312 cases
650 variables
The 1984 sample of public and private high 663-unit-long record
school students Include 16,499 respondents. 10 records per case

Related Publications:
Part 2
Bachman, J.G. and LD. Johnston Form 2 questionnaire
rectangular file structure
"The monitoring the future project: Design 3,329 cases
and procedures." Ann Arbor, MI: Institute 354 variables
for Social Research, 1978.
O·Malley,P.M., J.G. Bachman, and L.D. 367-unit-long record
6 records per case
Johnston
"Period, age, and cohort effects on sub-
stance use among American youth: 1976-
1982." Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social
Research, 1983.

122 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 3 Part 2
Form 3 questionnaire Forro 2 questionnaire
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
3,299 cases 3,174 casas
364 variables 360 variables
an-unit-long record 373-unlt-long record
6 records per case 6 records per case

Part 4 Part 3
Form 4 questionnaire Form 3 questionnaire
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
3,278 cases 3,148 cases
323 variables 369 variables
337-unit-long record 382-unlt-long record
5 records per case 6 records per case

PartS Part 4
Form 5 questionnaire Form 4 questionnaire
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
. 3,284 cases 3.120 cases
392 variables 325 variables
405-unlt-long record 339-unlt-long record
6 records per case 5 records per case

Part 6 Part 5
Core variables Form 5 questionnaire
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
16,502 cases 3,083 cases
117 variables 395 variables
130-unlt-long record 408-unlt-long record
2 records per case 6 records per case

Monitoring the future: A continuing Part 6


study of the lifestyles and values of Core variables
youth,1986 rectangular file structure
15,713 cases
(ICPSR 8701) 117 variables
130-unlt-long record
Summary: This Is the twelfth annual survey 2 records per case
undertaken In this series that examines the
changes in important values, behaviors, and Monitoring the future: A continuing
lifestyles among American youth. Class II study of the lifestyles and values of
youth,1987
Universe: High school seniors In the contigu-
ous United States. (ICPSR 9079)

Sampling: National multistage sample. Summary: This Is the thirteenth annual sur-
vey in this series that examines values, life-
Extent of collection: 6 data files + machine- styles, and behaviors among American youth.
readable documentation + SPSS control Class II
cards
Universe: High school seniors in the contigu-
OSIRIS and card image data formats, with ous United States.
SPSS control cards for each
Sampling: National multistage sample.
Part 1
Form 1 questionnaire Extent of collection: 6 data files + machine-
rectangular file structure readable documentation + SPSS control
3,188 cases cards
661 variables
676-unit-long record OSIRiS and card image data formats, with
10 records per case SPSS control cards for each

Delinquency 123
Part 1 and rate of change occurring over time. The
Form 1 questionnaire second obJective, more analytic than descrip-
rectangular file structure tive, Involves the explanation of the relation-
3,375 cases ships and trends observed. Several questions
673 variables relate to respondents' use of drugs-for ex-
689-unlt-long record ample, use of cigarettes, alcoholic beverages,
9 records per case mariJuana, hashish, psychedelic drugs, am-
phetamines, barbiturates, tranquilizers, co-
Part 2 caine, crack, heroin, and other narcotics. Also
Form 2 questionnaire Included are questions on parents' marital
rectangular file structure status and education, as weil as respondents'
3,368 cases religious preferences, school activities, politi-
377 variables cal beliefs and preferences, educational aspi-
390-unlt-long record rations, occupational alms, and mental and
5 records per case family plans. Additional questions probe for re-
spondents' attitudes toward government, so-
Part 3 clallnstltutlons, race relations, and changing
Form 3 questionnaire roles for women. Demographic Information on
rectangular file structure respondents such as race, sex, education,
3,358 cases and marital status are supplied. Class II
369 variables
382-unlt-long record Universe: High school seniors In the contigu-
5 records per case ous United States.

Part 4 Sampling: Nationally representative mUlti-


Form 4 questionnaire stage sample. The total sample Is divided Into
rectangular file structure five subsamples consisting of approximately
3,376 cases 337 variables 3,359 respondents. Each subsample Is ad-
351-unlt-lon9 record ministered a different form of the Question-
5 records per case naire, although all the respondents answer
the ·core" drug and demographic questions.
Part 5 Each of the questionnaires generates a corre-
Form 5 questionnaire sponding data file.
rectangular file structure
3,366 cases Extent of collection: 6 data files + machine-
395 variables readable documentation + SPSS control
408-unlt-long record cards
6 records per case
OSIRIS and card image data formats, with
Part 6 SPSS control cards for each
Form 6 questionnaire
rectangular file structure Part 1
16,843 cases Form 1 questionnaire
117 variables rectangular file structure
130-unlt-long record 3,386 cases
2 records per case 673 variables
689-unlt-long record
Monitoring the future: A continuing 10 records per case
study of the lifestyles and values of
youth,1988 Part 2
Form 2 questionnaire
(ICPSR 9259) rectangular file structure
3,356 cases
Summary: This is the fourteenth annual sur- 377 variables
vey in the Monitoring the Future series, a 390-unit-long record
data collection effort designed to explore 6 records per case
changes in important values, behaviors, and
liiestyie orientations of contemporary Ameri-
can youth. The study has two objectives. The
first Is to provide a systematic and accurate
description of the youth population of interest
in a given year, and to quantify the direction

124 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 3 Ing roles for women, educational asplrations,
Form 3 questionnaire and occupational alms along with their marital
rectMgular fila structure and family plans. Demographic Information
3,364 cases on respondents such as race, sex, education,
369 variables and marital status are supplied. Class II
382-unlt-long record
6 records per case Universe: High school seniors in the condgu.
ous United States.
Part 4
Form 4 questionnaire Sampling: Nationally representative multi-
rectangular file structure stage sample. The tc',a! sample Is divided Into
3,358 cases five subsamples C<3nslsting of approximately
341 variables 2,857 respondents, and each subsample Is
3SS-unlt-long record administered a different form of the question-
5 records per case naJre, although all the respondents answer
the ·core" drug and demographic questions.
PartS Each of the questionnaires generates a corre-
Form 5 questlonnalril sponding data fUe.
rectangular file structure
3,331 cases Extent of collection: 7 data files + machine-
396 variables readable documentatlon + SPSS Control
408·unlt-long record Cards
6 records per case
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with
PartS SPSS control cards for each
Core variables
rectangular fila structure Part 1
16,795 cases Core variables
117 variables rectangular file structure
130-unlt-long record 17,142 cases
2 records per case 117 variables
130-unlt-long record
Monitoring the future: A continuing 2 records per cas 0
study of the lifestyles and values of
youth, 1989 Part 2
Form 1 questionnaire
(ICPSR 9397) rectangular file structure
2,872 cases
Summary: This is the fifteenth annual survey 675 variables
in the Monitoring the Future sEll'ies, a data col- 691-unlt-long record
lection effort designed to explore changes In 10 records per case
Important values. behaviors, and lifestyle ori-
entations of contemporary American yputh. Part 3
The study has two objectives. The first is to Form 2 questionnaire
provide a systematic and accurate description rectangular file structure
of the youth population of Interest In a given 2,866 cases
year and to quantify the direction and rate of 377 variables
change O!:)currlng over time. The sscond ob" 390-unit.long record
jective, more analytic than descrJptive, In- 6 recrxds per case
volves the explanation of the relertlonshlps
and trends observed. OUestion topics related Part 4
to drug use Include respondents' use of ciga- Form 3 quostionnaire
rettes, alcoholic beverages, marijuana, hash- rsctangular fila structure
Ish, psychedelic drugs, amphetamines, barbl· 2,847 cases
turates, tranqulUzEll's. cocaine, crack, heroin, 369 variables
and other narcotics. Also included are ques- 382-unit.long record
tions on parents' marital status and educa- 6 records per case
tion, as well as respondents' religious prefer-
ences, school activities, and political beliefs
and prefEll'ences. Additional questions probe
for respondents' attitudes toward govern-
ment, socla11nstlMions, race relations, chang-

Delinquency 125
Part 5 Note: The data are organized hlerarhlcally In
Form 4 questionnaire two levels: (1) a person record, and (2) one or
rectangular file structure more arrest records. Number of records per
2,854 cases case varies In Elach of the two data files. The
341 variables number of records Is dependent on the num·
355·unlt·long record ber of arrests an offender had. There are 14
5 records per case variables and 129,010 cases at the person
level, and 16 variables and 12,555 cases at
Part 6 the arrest level.
Form 5 questionnaire
rectangular file structure Extent of Collection: 2 data flies
2,852 cases
395 variables logical Record Length data format
408·unlt·long record
6 records per case Part 1
Arrests for serious crimes
Part 7 hierarchical file structure
Form 6 questionnaire
rectangular file structure Part 2
2,851 cases Arrests for larceny or auto theft
387 variables hierarchical file structure
4oo·unlt·long record
6 records per case

Blumstein, Anred and Jacqueline Cohen

Blumstein, Mred and Jacqueline Cohen Adult criminal careers, Michigan:


1974·1977
Adult criminal careers In New York,
1972-1983 (ICPSR 8279)

(ICPSR 9353) ThIs study was sponsored by the United states


Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
TIls study was sponsored by the United States tice. The grant number Is 79·NI·GG·0121.
Depcrtment of Justice, Na1:onal Institute of Jus·
tice. The grant number Is 82·IJ·CX·OOO2. Summary: These data are Intended to de-
velop estimates of the extent and variation of
Summary: This data collection was designed Individual offending. The data were taken
to estimate the extent and variation of crimi- from the computerized criminal history files of
nal offenses by crime type, race, age, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Included
prior criminal record. Included In this collec· are the adult criminal records of Individuals 17
tion are the criminal records of Individuals years of age and older arrested In Michigan
aged 16 years or older who were arrested In from 1974 to 1977. The primary criterion for
the state of New York from 1972 to 1986. Two Inclusion In the sample was at least one ar-
separate data files are supplied. Part 1 con· rest In Michigan for murder, rape, robbery, ago
talns data on all adults arrested In New York gravated assault, burglary, or auto theft. Once
from 1972 to 1976 for rape, murder, robbery, sampled, the arrest history Includes data on
aggravated assault, or burglay. Part 21n· ALL recorded arrests through 1977, regard·
eludes data on all Individuals arrested for lar· less of offense type. The full dataset Includes
ceny or auto theft In Albany and Erie toun· records tor 41 ,191 Individuals for a total of
ties. Variables Include items such as sex, 200,007 arrests. The dataset Is organized by
race, age, number of prior arrests, date and individual, Including demographic aspects of
place of arrest, arrest charged, number of the Individual (birth date, state of birth, sex,
multiple counts, court disposition of charges, and race) followed by Information from the In·
and type and length of sentence. Class IV divldual's arrest record In chronological order.
The arrest records Include the date of arrest,
Universe: Adults, aged 16 or older, arrested In the offenses charged, the disposition (con-
the general areas of New York state for the of· victed, dismissed, or acquitted), and the sen·
fenses of murder, rape, robbery, aggravated tence. Because the data are organized by In-
assault, or burglary and for larceny or auto dividual, they are suitable for longitudinal
theft In Albany or Erie counties. analyses of Individual offendIng patterns over
a long period of time. The data are contained

126 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


In one file with 57 variables tor 241,198 economIc status, verbal and spatlalintelll-
cases. Class IV gence, and number of offenses. Class IV
Sampling: Subjects were selected from a
sample of 2,958 black children whose moth-
Debro, Julius ers participated in the Collaborative Prenatal
Project at Pennsyivania Hospital between
Research on minorities, [1981}: 1959 and 1962.
Race and crime In Atlanta and
Extent of collection: 1 data file
Washington, D.C.
(lCPSR 8459) logical record length data format

TIls study was sponsored by the United States rectangular file structure
Depmment of Justice, Natlon~ Inst"ute of Jus- 987 cases
tice. The grEM'lt number Is 8O-NI-AX-003. 200 variables
360-unlt-long record
Summary: This Is an Investigation of crimino- 1 record per case
logical and sociological factors within the
black community, and focuses on the alleged Related Publication:
high incidence of violent crime committed by Denno, Deborah W.
blacks. Four communities within Atlanta, 'Soclologlcal and human development ex-
Georgia and four within Washington, DC planations of crime: Conflict or consen-
were selected for this study: two communities sus?" CrImInology 23 (1985),711-741.
In each area were designated high crime ar-
eas whUe the other two were low crime areas.
Included among the variables are: the rela-
tionship of race and socioeconomic class to EHlott, Delbert
crime, faar of crime and experiences, con-
tacts and attitudes toward the police, gender, National youth survey [United States]:
and religion. There are 621 cases tn this da- Wave I, 1976
taset, which has a logical record length of 84
characters. Class IV (ICPSR 8375)

This dataset contains parent and youth data


for the first wave of the National Youth Sur-
vf1/. Youths and one of their parents or legal
Denno, Deborah W. guardians were Interviewed in early 1977
longitudinal study of blosoclal factors about events and behavior occurring during
calendar year 1976. Included Is information
related to crime and delinquency, on demographics and socioeconomic status
1959·1962: [Pennsylvania] of respondents, disruptive events In the
(ICPSR 8928) home, neighborhood problems, parental aspi-
rations for youth. labeling, Integration of fam-
TIls study was sponsored by the United States lIyand peer contexts, attitudes toward devi-
Depmment of Justice, Nationel Institute of Jus- ance In adults and Juveniles, parental
tice. The grmt number is 81-IJ-CX-00sS(S1). discipline, community involvement, and drug
use. The National Survey of Youth was sup-
Summary:Thls study was designed to meas- ported by the Centar of Studies of Crime and
ure the effects of family background and de- Delinquency, NiMH, and the National Institute
velopmental characteristics on school for Jwenila Justice and Dellnquency Preven-
achievement and delinquency within a "high tion. The data are contained In one file which
risk" sample of black youths. The study in- has a logical record length of 80 characters.
cludes variables describing the mother and There ere 11 cards per case. Class III
the child, Mother.related variables assess pre-
natal health, pregnancy and delivery compli-
cations, and socioeconomic status. Child-re-
lated variables focus on the child at age
seven and include place in birth order, physi-
cal development, family constellation, socio-

Delinquency 127
Elliott, Delbert OSIRIS and card Image data formats
National youth survey [United States]: rectangular file structure
Wave II, 1977 1,725 cases
900 variables
(ICPSR 8424) 1,368-unit-long record
21 records per case
Parent and youth data for the second wave of
the National Youth Survey are contalned In
this data collection. The first wave was con-
ducted in 1976 (iCPSR 8375). Youths and
their par6f1ts or legal guardians were inter- Elliott, Delbert
viewed In early 1978 about events and behav- National youth survey [United States]:
Ior which had occurred In 1977. The second
wave of the study was funded Jointly by the Wave IV, 19'/9
National InstiMe of Mental Health and the Bu- (lCPSR 8917)
reau of Justice Statistics (formerly the Law
Enforcement Assistance Administration). Be- Summary: Parent and youth data for the
cause of the funding arrangement, the inter- fourth wave of the National Youth Survey are
view schedules used In Wave I and Wave II contained In this dala collection. The first
are slightly different; e.g" there are differ- wave of this survey was conducted In 1976
ences In the "drug use" section. Data were (ICPSR 8375), the second wave In 1977
collected on demographic and socioeconomic (ICPSR 8424), and the third wave in 1978
status of respondents, disruptive events in (ICPSR 8506). Data are aVailable on demo-
the home, neighborhood problems, parental graphic and socioeconomic status of respon-
aspirations for youth, labeling, integration of dents, disruptive events In the home, neigh-
family and peer contexts, attitudes toward de- borhood prcblems, parenla.1 aspirations for
viance In adults and Juveniles, parental disci- youth, labeling, integration of family and peer
pline, and community Involvement. The data contexts, attitudes toward deviance In adults
are contained In one file which has a logical and juveniles, parental discipline, and commu-
record length of 80 characters. There are 963 nity Involvement. Class IV
variables. Class III
Universe: High school aged youth In the
United States.

Elliott, Delbert Note: In the documentation, variable names


are preceded by the code "Y4" to indicate the
National youth survey [United States]: fourth wave of youth data The data are con-
Wave III, 1978 talned in 15 80-column records or "cards".
Missing data am coded as blank, and "Don't
(ICPSR 8506) know" responses are coded as blan:", unless
otherwise indicated.
Summary: Parent and youth data for the third
wave of the National Youth Survey are con- Extent of collection: 1 data file
talned In this data collection which Includes
data for youth Interviewed in 1979 about Card image data format
events and behavior of the preceding year,
1978. The first wave was conducted in 1976 rectanaular file structure
(ICPSR 8375) and the second Wave was con- 1,725 eases
ducted in 1977 (ICPSR 8424). Data were col- 720 variables
lected on demographic and socioeconomic 80-unit-long record
status of respondents, disruptive events in 15 records per case
the home, neighborhood problems, parental
aspimtions for youth, labeling, integration of Related Publication:
family and peer contexts, attitudes toward de- Elliott, Delbert, David Huizinga, and Ageton
viance in adults and juveniles, parental disci- Explaining delinquency and drug use. Bev-
pline, and community involvement. Class III erly HiII~, CA: Sage Publications, 1985.
Universe: Youth in the United States.

Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-


readable documentation

128 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


-- --- ------------

Elliott, Delbert also performed psychologleaJ tests to deter-


mine the sources of crime and delinquency.
National youth survey [United States]: Information In the survey InclUdes reports
Wave V, 1980 from peers, family size, chiid-ra.'lI'lng behav-
let, Job histories. leisure habits, truancy, popu-
(ICPSR 9112) larity, physical attributes, tendencies toward
violence, sexual actiVity, and self-reported de-
Summary: Parent and youth data for the fifth linquency. Class II
wave o.f the National Youth Survey are con-
tained in this collect/on. American youths and Sampling: The major part of the sample was
their parents were interviewed in early 1981 chosen by taking all boys aged eight to nine
about current events and behavior that oc- who were on the registers of six state primary
curred during the previous year. Data are schools located within a one mile radius of a
avallable on demographIc and socioeconomic research office which had been established.
status of respondents. disrupt/'Je events In the
home, neighborhood problems, parental aspi- Universe: Population of young male children
rations for youth, labelirg, integration of family from a worklng class urban area.
and pesr contexts, attr.udes towards deviance
in adults and juveniles, parental discipline, and Note: A knowledge of British criminal Justice
COffimJnity Involvement. Class IV terminology would be helpful for those using
the data. Various British governmental and
Unlverse:Youths In the United States. law enforcement Institutions are mentioned.
Variables concerning the socioeconomic
Sampling: National sample of American youth status of respondents, schools attended, and
population selected by area probability personality characteristics use code explana-
sampling. tions that are not fully dooumented. The princi-
pal Investigator has offered to consult with re-
Note: The first wave of this survey was con- searchers on the use of the data, Contact
ducted in 1976 (ICPSR 8375). the second Professor David Farrington, Insti:'ute of Crimi-
wave in 1977 (ICPSR 8424), the third wave In nology, 7 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9dt,
1978 (iCPSR 8506), and the fourth wave in England. Telephone 01144-223-335384 or
1979 (ICPSR 8317). Variable names are pre- 01144-223·870597.
ceded by the code "Y5" to indicate the fifth
wave of youth data Missing data are coded Extent of collection: 1 data file + machlne-
as blank. "Don't know" responses are coded readable documentation + SPSS control
blank, unless otherwise indicated. cards
Extent of collection: 1 data file OSIRIS and Cdi'd image data formats, with
SPSS control cards for each
Card Image data format
rectangular file structure
rectangular file sir:Jcture 411 cases
1,725 eases 880 variables
689 variables 1,090-unit-Iong record
80-unlt-long record 15 records per case
15 records per case

Figlio, Robert M., Paul E. Tracy, and


Farrington, David P. Marvin E. Wolfgang
Cambridge study In delinquent Delinquency In a bhth cohort II:
development [Grea~ Britain], 1961·1981 Philadelphia, 1958-1986
(ICPSR 8488) (ICPSR 9293)
Summary: These data were collected in order Summary: The purpose of this data collection
to test several hypotheses about delinquency.
was to follow a birth cohort born in Philadel-
The principal investigator examined socioeco- phia during 1958 with a special focus on delin-
nomic conditions, schooling, friendship, par- quent activities as children and as adults. The
ent-child relationships, extracurricular activi-
collection includes a file that offers basic
ties, school records, and criminal records. He demographic information on each cohort

Delinquency 129
member such as sex, race, date of birth, Part 3
church membership, age, and socioeconomic Adult offense data
status. In addition, two files supply offense rectangular file structure
data, one pertaining to offenses committed 9,057 cases
while a juvenile and the other detailing oi- 109 variables
fenses as an adult. Variables Include most se- 252-unlt-long record
rious offense, police disposition, location of 1 record per case
crime, reason for police response, complain-
ant's sex, age, and race, type of Victimization, Part 4
date of offense, number of victims, average Survey of young adults: 1958 Philadelphia
age of victims, number of victims killed or hos- Birth Cohort Follow-up
pitalized, property loss, weapon Involvement, rectangular file structure
and final court disposition. Class IV 782 cases
Approx. 900 variables
Universe: All children born In Philadelphia dur- SO-unlt-Iong record
Ing 1958. 50 records per case

Note: When using the file on juvenile of-


fenses, users should exclude from analyses
any records of offenses committed when the
offender was over 17 years of age. All re- Gold, Martin
cords Included In the juvenile file represent po- National survey of youth, 1972
lice contacts. Only a subset of these cases
represents true offenses or violations of the (ICPSR 7593)
Pennsylvania Crime Code. The variable
EVENTYPE distinguishes between true of- This study builds upon an earlier study by the
fenses and cases that are police contacts principal investigator entitled National Survey
only. The crime code fields can also be used of Youth, 1967 (ICPSR 3509). Uke the pre-
to distinguish true offense charges from vious study, it was designed to measure the
charges that represent police contacts only. frequency and seriousness of delinquent ac-
Police contacts are those designated In the tivity among a representative sample of
crime code value labels by an asterisk directly American boys and girls; 1,395 interviews
following the "=" sign. For example, "1001 = were collected in the spring of 1972 from re-
COUNTERFEIT" represents a true offense, spondents who were 11 to 1B years old. The
while "2624 ="RUNAWAY" represents a po- interviews obtained information about the
lice contact only. teenagers' family characteristics, Including job
history, family size, and parents' education, at-
Extent of collection: 4 data files + machine- titudes toward school, school grades, peer
readable documentation group activities, and job aspirations. Respon-
dents were also rulked to indicate which of
Logical record length and card image data seventeen offenses they had committed in
format the previous three years and then to detail
the circumstances of each offense they re-
Part 1 ported. Sixteen of the offenses matched the
Demographic cohort daia list presented in the 1967 study; an additional
rectang'Jlar file structure offense, marijuana use, was included to re-
27,160 cases flect the changes that had appeared in the
28 variables American society during the intervening study
M-un/t-Iong record years. The data are available without restric-
1 record per case tion. Potential users of the National Survey of
Youth (NSy) datasets are advised, however,
Par'!2 to contact the original principalinvestigatcr,
JWlenile offense data D'. Martin Gold (Institute for Social Rasearch,
rectangular file structure The University of Michigan, Box 1248, Ann Ar-
19,145 cases bor, MI 48106), about their intended uses of
96 variables the data. These datasets have been and are
225-unit-long record being used extensively by researchers. Expe-
1 record per case rience has shown that informing D'. Gold of
intended use of the data can prevent unnec-
essary and sometimes embarrassing duplica-
tion of effort and can avoid misuse of the data
arising out of misunderstanding their nature.

130 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


IX. Gold would also apprecIate receiving cop- Haapenan, Rudy and Cart F. Jesness
Ies of reports based on the NSY datasets.
Class III Early Identification of the chronic
offender, [1978-1980: California]
(ICPSR 8226)
Gold, Martin and Jay R. Williams This Study was sponsored by the United
States Department of Justice, National Institute
National survey of youth, 1967 of Justice. The grant number is 79-IJ-AX-0114.
(ICPSR 3509)
Summary: The patterns of adult criminal be-
In the spring of 1967, 847 Interviews were col- havior are examined In this data collection.
lected in a study desIgned to measure the fre- Data covering the adult years of peak criminal
quencyand seriousness of delinquent activity, activity (from approximately 18 to 26 years of
detected or undetected, among a repre- age) Were obtained on three samples of delin-
sentative sample of American boys and girls quent youths who had been Incarcerated in
13 to 16 years old. The interview elicited Infor- California Youth Authority Institutions during
mation about the teenagers' family charac- the decade of the 1960s. Data Were obtalned
teristics, Including parents' aducation, job his- from three sources: official arrest records of
tcry, and family size, attitudes toward school, the CaI!fornia Bureau of Crimlnallnvestiga-
school grades, peer group activities and job tion and Identification (CII); supplementary
aspirations. Respondents were asked to Indi- data from the Federal Bureau of Investiga-
cate which of 16 offenses they had committed tion; and the California Bureau of Vital Statis-
In tho previous three years and then to detall tics. Follow-up data were collected between
the circumstances of each offense they re- 1978 and 1980. The unit of analysis In this da-
ported. The teenagers' reports of delinquency taset Is the individual offender and the num-
were checked against official delinquency re- bers of cases In the tl1ree samples are 1,715,
cords. The data are avallable without restric- 982, and 210. There are two flies per sample.
tion. Potential users of the National Survey of The first is a background data file containing
Youth (NSY) datasets are advised, howeva', information obtained while the subjects were
to contact the original principal investigatc:r, housed in Youth Authority Institutions, and the
IX. Martin Gold (Institute for Social Research, second is a follow-up history offense file con-
The University of Michigan, Box 1248, Ann Ar- taining data from arrest records. Each individ-
bor, MI 48106), about their Intended uses of ualls Identified by a unique ID number, which
the data. These datasets have been and are is the same in the background and offense
being used extensively by researchers. Expe- history files. Each case has 56 arrest vari·
rience has shown that Informing IX. Gold of abies. The samples have differing numbers of
intended use of the data can prevent unnec- variables for the background information.
essary and sometimes embarrassing duplica- Class IV
tion of effort and can avoid misuse of the data
arising out of misunderstanding their nature.
~. Gold would also appreciate receiving cop-
Ies of reports based on the NSY datasets. Katz. Jack
Two data files are avallable: one with the Indi-
vidual respondent as the unit of analysis (50 Autobiographical accounts of property
cards of data per respondent, and 828 vari- offenses by youths at UCLA, 1983-1984
ables) and one with each incident of an of-
fense as the unit of analysis (1,597 variables). (ICPSR 8950)
Class III
Summary: These data examine the attraction
Related Publication: of shoplifting and vandalism to nonprofes-
WilUams, Jay R. and Martin. Gold sional offenders. The data consist of actual
"From delinquent behavior to official delin- autobiographical accounts of offenses com-
quency." Social Problems 20 (Fall 1972). mitted by undergraduates enrolled in three
sections of undergraduate criminology
classes at the University of California, Los Arl-
geles. Verbatim answers of the respondents
are presented. Class III

Universe: Undergraduate university students


In the United States.

Delinquency 131
---------,

Sampling: The sample consisted of 250 stu- scores, aga at first theft, and drug and alcohol
dents in three offerings of an undergraduate use. Class IV
criminology class.
Universe: Males In the fourth, seventh, and
Note: This dataset Is a machlne-readabl e text tenth grades from 21 elementary and high
file. For reasons of confidentiality names schools In Orogon.
have been blanked from the data and re-
placed with spaces. Profanity has also been Sampling: Subjects were selected from a
blanked and replaced with spaces. The num- sample of 300 families who volunteered to
ber of records per case In this file varies from participate in all phases of the study.
nine to ten depending on the length of state-
ment given by each respondent. Extent of collection: 2 data files

Extent of collection: 1 data file logical record length data format

Card Image data format Part 1


lime one data
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
122 cases 245 cases
2 variables 219 variables
SO-unit-Iong record 1,740-unit-long record
1 record per case
Related Publication:
Katz, Jack Part 2
"Sneaky thrills. Seductions of crime." New lime two data
York, NY: Basic Books, 19S8. rectangular file structure
188 cases
858 variabies
1,159-unit-long record
Loeber, Ron 1 record per case

Screening of youth at risk for Related Publications:


delinquency In Oregon, 1980-1985 Loeber, Rolf, Thomas Dishon, and Gerald
Patterson
(ICPSR 9312) "Multiple gating: A multistage assessment
procedure for identifying youths at risk for
This study was sponsored by the United States delinquency." Journal of Research in
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- Crime and Delinquency 21 (1984),7-32.
tice. The grant number is 84-IJ-CX-0048. Loeber, Rolf, and Magda Stouthamer Loeber
"The prediction of delinquency." In H.C.
Summary: This longitudinal study follows Quay (ed.) Handbook of Juvenile Delin-
three birth cohorts of youngsters who were quency. New York, NY: Wiley, 1986.
considered at risk because of antisocial be- Loeber, Rolf, and Bruce Bowers
havior or because of officially recorded delin- "The screening of youths at risk for delin-
quency at early ages. The youth were se- quency: A manual" (unpublished report).
lected from 21 elementary and high schools Washington, DC: National Institute of
through two screening procedures or "gat- Justice.
ings." The first procedure used teacher rat-
ings, mothers' reports, and parental monitor-
ing. The second procedure involved teacher
ratings for school competence and mothers' Nationalinstttute of Justice,
reports of antisocial behavior in the home.
Data were collected on youths' personal, fam- U.S. Department of Justice
ily, school, and criminal backgrounds. Data Drug use forecasting In 20 cities In the
also are available on parental authoritaria'1- United States, 1987-1988
ism, proportion of days parents were absent,
parents' expressiveness, and parental con- (ICPSR 9477)
flict. Additional variables relate to youths' inde-
pendence and achievement, family criminal- Summary: This data collection investigates
ity, home conduct problems, school the level of drug use among drug offenders
disruptiveness, school competence score, and monitors changes in drug use trends.
self-reported delinquency, peer delinquency These data address the following topics:

132 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


(1) types of drugs used by offenders, (2) level Paternoster, Raymond, et at
of dependency on drugs, (3) offenders' reo
ported need for alcohol/drug treatment, (4) Youths and deterrence: Columbia,
whether drug use Is related to certain types of South Carolina, 1979·1981
offenses, and (5) the relationship between of·
fender·reported drug use and urinalysis find· (ICPSR 8255)
ings. The data also reflect the arrestee's cur·
rent charge, self·reported clrug use, and age This study was sponsored by the United
at first drug u:se. Demographic variables sup- Strues Department of Justice, Natlonallnsti·
plied Includ~age of arrestee, ethnicity, sex, tute of Justice. The grant numbers are 81·IJ·
education, marital status, and employment CX·0023 and 83·IJ·CX·0095.
status. The drugs tested for inclooe marijuana,
opiates, ~ne, PCP, methctlone, benzodi· Summary: This investigation of a high school·
azeplnes (Valium), methaqualone, pro· aged youth cohort was conducted in Colum·
poxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and am· bia, South Carolina. Identical qUestionnalres
phetamines. Questions about recent and past were administered to students each year, and
use, age at first use, and length of depend- the longitudinal data contaln information on
ency were asked for each drug the arrestee demographic and socioeconomic charac·
reported ever having tried. Other topic areas teristics, educational aspirations, occupational
covered by the data Include type of offense aims, and peer group activities. Also included
for which arrested, Injection history, drug and is Information from respondents on which of·
alcohol treatment history, and treatment fenses they committed, the number of times
needs. The unit of observation is the Indivld· they were apprehended by the police, their at·
ual. Class IV titudes toward deviancy, and perceived cer-
tainty of punishment. Class IV
Universe: Drug arrestees in 20 cities in the
United States Universe: Yo LIth from nine high schools in Co·
lumbla, South Carolina.
Sampling: The probability sample repre·
senting male arrestaes In the 20 cities is Extent of collection: 1 data liIe
10,554. All female arrestees (3,261) in only
14 cities were Included. Card Image data format

Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine· rectangular file structure


readable documentation 3,882 cases
164 variables
logical record length data format and SPSSX 80·unit·long record
export file 19 records per case

Part 1
Raw data
rectangular ffie structure Pennell, Susan, Christine Curtis, and Jeff
13,815 cases Tayman
184 variables
351·unit·long record Illegal ImmIgration and crIme In san
1 record per case Diego and EI Paso counties, 1985·1986
Part 2 (ICPSR 9330)
SPSSX export file
rectangular file structure ThIs study was sponsored by the United St<:l.tes
13,815 cases Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus·
184 variables tice. The grant number Is 86·IJ·CX·0038.
80·unlt·long record
Summary: This study was conducted to ex·
amine whether a rising crime rate in EI Paso,
Texas and San Diego, California in 1986
could be attributed to, among other factors,
the Influx of undocumented aliens. Data were
collected 1n the two cities with a focus on serio
O(.IS felony offenses. Variables include level of
involvement of undocumented aliens In serio
ous felony arrests in San Diego and EI Paso

Delinquency 133
Counties, the outcome of serious felony ar- Related PUblications:
rest cases Involving undocumented persons Pennell, S., and J. Tayman
compared to others arrested for similar of- "The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the
fenses, the Impact of arrests of undocu- criminal justice system.· San Diego, CA:
mented aliens on the criminal justice system San Diego Association of Governments,
In terms of workload and cost, the extent that 1989.
criminal justice agencies coordinate their ef- Pennell, S., C. Curtis, and J. Tayman
forts to apprehend and process undocu- "Data resources program award no. CX-
mented a1lem~ who have committed serious 0038: Case tracking study documentation:
crimes In San Diego and EI Paso counties, Illegal immigration and crime in San Diego
and how differences In agency objectives Im- and EI Paso counties, FY 1985-56." San
pede or enhance coordination. Data are also Diego, CA: San Diego Association of Gov-
provided on how many undocumented per- ernments Criminal Justice Research Unit,
sons were arrested/convicted for repeat of- and Los Aitos, CA: Data Resources Pro-
fenses In these counties and which type of gram of the National Institute of Justice,
policies or procedures could be Implemented Soclometrics Corporation, 1989.
In criminal Justice agencies to address the Is-
sue of crimes committed by undocumented
aliens. The collection Includes soclodemo-
graphic characteristics, citizenship status, cur-
rent arrest, case disposition, and prior crimi- Polk, Kenneth
nal history with additional data from San Marlon County [Oregon] youth study,
Diego to compute the costs Involving undocu- 1964·1979
mented aliens. Class IV
(ICPSR 8334)
Universe: Serious felony offense arrests in EI
Paso County, Texas and San Diego County, This Is an investigation of the young men In
California Marion County, Oregon between the years of
1964 and 1979. The subjects were Inter-
Sampling: In EI Paso all arrests for selected viewed In a twelve-wave panel study begin-
offenses were Included. In San Diego all ning In their sophomore year of high school
homicide and rape arrests were Included. A and continUing to age 30. The original base
stratified random sample with equal prob- population was determined through a large
abilities used to select 40 percent of the ar- scale survey of the county's youth, the male
rests was chosen within each of the other of- portion consisting of 1,227 Individuals. The
fense categories, which included robbery, first wave, conducted in the high schools In
aggravated assault, burglary, grand theft and 1964, consisted of a 200- item questionnaire.
motor vehicle theft, receiving stolen property, The second wave, the first In the longitudinal
and felony narcotics offenses. design, Involved face-to-face Interviews with
a 225-item instrument. The ten subsequent
Extent of collection: 2 data files waves of the study were conducted by mail,
at nearly year intervals. The Interview sched-
Card image data format ules are concerned with the issues of coming
of age such as family relations, school per-
Part 1 formance, educational plans, dating, drinking,
San Diego county dala drug use, military service, delinquency, of-
rectangular file structure fenses and dispositions (civilian and military),
4,431 cases and Vietnam experiences. The collection con-
128 variables sists of a data file that has been organized so
80-unit-long record that each of the 1,227 respondents Is repre-
5 records per case sented by 36 separate records. This results In
a total of 44,172 records, each with a logical
Part 2 record length of 162. The first 22 records con-
B Paso county dala tain data on 800 distinct variables gathered in
rectangular file structure the 12 waves of interviews. Records 26-28
2,268 cases are for the 17 variablc,s associated with the ju-
128 variables venile and adult offense data. There are 15
80-unit-long record socioeconomic variables, gathered for the
5 records per case "random sample group· only, which are found
in record 29. The last seven records contain
400 variables which concern Careers and Vi-
etnam Experiences. Class IV

134 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Shannon, Lyle W. Shannon, Lyle W.
Juvenile delinquency and adult crime, Juvenile delinquency and adult crlme j
1948·1977 [Racine, Wisconsin]: City 1948~1971 [Racine, WisconsIn]: Three
ecological data birth cohorts
(lCPSR 8164) (ICPSR 8163)

Tt'is study was sponsored by the United States ThIs study VIa'" sponsored by the United States
Depeftment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- Department of Justice, Natiooal Institute of Jus-
tice. The grmt number is 84-IJ·CX-0013. tice. The grant number Is 84-IJ-CX-0013.

These data are intended to be used in con- Summary: This data collection contains data
junction with the Juvenile delinquency and on Juvenile delinquency and adult crime for
adult crime, 1948·1977 [Racine, Wiscon- three birth cohorts in Racine, Wisconsin. The
sin): Three birth cohorts (ICPSR 8163). three birth cohorts are 1942, 1949, and 1955.
These data are organized into 2 different The 1942 cohort consists of 1,352 persons,
types, Biock data and Home data The Block the 1949 cohort of 2,099 persons, and the
Dataset contains the characteristics of each 1955 cohort of 2,676, a total of 6,127 per-
block in Racine for the years 1950, 1960, and sons. These data are organized into 3 basic
1970 as selected from the U.S. Census of types of datasets: 1) Individual-level "Police
Housing for each at these years. The data contact" data for all 3 cohorts, 2} Indlvidual-
are presented for whole blocks for each year level Interview and contact data for the 1942
and for blocks agglomerated into equal and 1949 cohorts, and 3} Individual-level con-
spaces so that comparison may be made be- tact data classified by age for all three co-
tween the 1960, 1960 and 1970 data. In addi- horts, "Age-by-Age" data There are 8 data
tion, land use and target density (gas sta- files in all, The individual-level contact data
tions, grocery and liquor stores, restaurants, sets, referred to as the "police contact data, "
and taverns) measures are included. The contaln equivalent data for all three cohorts.
data were obtalned from land use maps and The data consist of tha type and frequency of
city directories. These block data have been police contacts by individuals as well as the
aggregated into census tracts, police grid ar- date, location, and number of the first contact.
eas, natural areas, and neighborhoods tor the Individual cohort members are the units of
purpose of describing the spatial units of each analysis. The interview datasets contain data
in comparable fashion for 1950, 1960, and on police contacts as well as a number of vari-
1970. The Information contalned within the ables measured during personal interviews
Block data file is intended to be used to with a sample of the 1942 and 1949 cohorts.
merge ecological data onto any of the files de- The interview variables include retrospective
scribed in the Juvenile delinquency adult measures of the respondent's perception of
crimo, 1948-1977 [Racine, Wisconsin}: his or her past police contacts, attitudes to-
Throe birth cohorts codebook. The Home ward the police, and a variety of other vari-
datasets contain selected variables from the ables such as socioeconomic status and age
block data files merged with the cohort police at marriage. The "age-by-age" dataset con-
contact data or the cohort interview data The tains juvenile court and police contact data
Home datasets represent the merged files classified by age. The data are organized into
used by the Principal Investigator for his three equivalent datasets, one for each co-
analysis and are included here only as exam- hort, and the Individual cohort member Is the
ples of how the files from the cohort data may unit of analysis. In contrast to the cohort data,
be merged with the block data. Class IV howeva-, the police contact data are organ-
ized according to the age of the cohort mem-
ber at the time of the contact(s). Thus vari-
ables have been constructed which measure
and summarize the number, type(s}, and seri-
ousness of contacts at a given age. These da·
tasets also contaln detalled data on the
type(s} of dispositlon(s) received by cohort
members at various ages. Class II

Delinquency 135
Singer, Simon I. Related Publication:
Singer, S.I., and D. McDowall
Deterrent effects of the New York ·Crlmlnallzing delinquency: The deterrent
Juvenile offender law, 1974-1984 effects of the New York Juvenile of~ender
iaN." Law and Soc{ety Review 22 (1988),
(ICPSR 9324) 521-535.
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number Is 85-IJ-CX-0026.
Swicord, Donald
Summary: This data collection was designed
Survey of facilities for runaway and
to assess the effects of the New York Juve-
nile Offender law on the rate of violent crime homeless youth, 1983·1988
committed by juveniles. The data were col- (ICPSR 9129)
lected to estimate the deterrent effects of the
law and to permit the use of an interrupted Summary: This data collection Is a compila-
tiffle-S9ries model to gauge the effects of the tion of demographic and service Information
interventi()fl. The deterrent effects of the law collected on youth In resldentlal and non-resi-
are assessed en five types of violent offenses dential shelters for runaways and homeless
over a post-intervention period of 75 months youth. The data provide descriptions of the
using two comparison fAme series to control youths using the shelters Including age, sex,
for temporal and geofjraphical characteristics. race, education, family setting, shelter serv-
One time series pertr.:llns to the monthiy Juve- Ices provided, and aftercare services re-
nile arrests of 16- to 19-year-olds in New York ceiVed. Class IV
City, and the other to monthly arrests of Juve-
niles aged 13 to 15 years in Philadelphia,. the Universe: Runaway and homeless youths In
control jurisdiction. Included in the collection 270 shelters in the United States, the District
are variables concerning the monthly rates of of Columbia, and the Trusts Territories.
violent Juvenile arrests for homicide, rape, as-
sault, arson, and robbery for the two Juvenile Extent of collection: 2 data tiles
cohorts. These time series data were col-
lected by Individual police Jurisdictions that re- logical record length data format
ported monthly arrests to the Uniform Crime
Reporting Division of the Federal Bureau of Part 1
Investigation. Class IV Youth information form (YIF)
rectangular tile structure
Universe: Juveniles arrested by police be- 78,005 cases
tween January 1974 and December 1984 in 118 variables
the state of New York and in Philadelphia, 138-unit-long record
Pennsylvania 1 record per case
Sampling: Juvenile arrests reported by police Part 2
between January 1974 and December 1984 Information collection and research
In New York City, upstate New York, and evaluation form (ICARE)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The monthly data rectangular file structure
for Philadelphia were collected to serve as a 102,280 cases
control series for comparison with the New 172 variables
York series. 235-unlt-long record
1 record per case
Extent of collection: 1 data file

Card Image data format

rectangular file structure


132 cases
26 variables
80-unit-long record
3 records per case

136 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Tach, Hans and Kenneth Adams Part 2
Criminal record data
Disturbed violent offenders In New rectangular file structure
York,1985 9,697 cases
6 variables
(ICPSR 9325) 20-unlt-long record
1 record per case
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
Department of JusUce, Natlonallnstkute of Jus- Part 3
tice. The grant number Is SS-IJ-CX-0033. Mental health data
rectangular file structure
Summary: This data collection was designed 3,365 cases
to Investigate the relationship between mental 6 variables
Illness and violent Involvement over an of· 20·unll-Iong record
fender's criminal career and to develop a ty- 1 record per case
pology of violent offenders that takes Into ac-
count both mental health history and Related Publication:
substance Use history. The collection Is organ- Tech, H., and K Adams
Ized so that data for the violent offender co- "The disturbed violent otrender" (unpub-
hort can be matched with records of offender lished final report). Washington, DC: N~­
mental health history, substance abuse his- tional Institute of Justice, 1988.
tory, and criminal career history. The offend-
ers studied were convicted of statutorlly·de-
fined "VIolent offenses.~ Included In the
collection are variables concerning conviction
offenses, Intoxication status, vlctim·offender Wid om, Cathy Spatz
relationship, Injury result, type of violence, em·
ployment, marital status, gender, and race. Child abuse, neglect, and violent
The criminal history file contains variables on criminal behavior In a midwest
dates of arrest or jlNenile contacts. The men- metropolitan area of the United States,
tal history file Include~ dates of entry and 1967-1988
"types of mental health services received, In-
formation on the personal characteristics of of- (ICPSR 9480)
fenders and their offenses were collected
from the New York State Department of Cor- This study was sponsored by the United States
rectional Services. The data for both mental Department of Justice, National Inst~ute of Jus-
health history and drug treatment history ~ce. The grant number Is OO-IJ·CX-0033.
were obtained from computerized client reo
cords maintained by the New York State Of- Summary: These data examine the relation-
fice of Mental Health. Class IV ships between childhOOd abuse and/or ne-
glect and later criminal and violent criminal be-
Universe: All offenders convicted of violent of- havia'. In particul~, the data focus on
fenses and sentenced to terms of Incarcera- whether being a victim of violence and/or ne-
tion during the period January 1985 through glect In early childhood leads to being a crimi-
December 1985 In the state of New York. nal offender in adolescence or earlX adult-
hood and whether a relationship exists
Extent of collection: 3 data files between childhood abuse or neglect and ar-
rests as a jlNenile, arrests as an adult, and ar-
logical record length data format rests for violent offenses. For this data cellec-
tion adult and juvenile criminal histories of
ParU sampled cases with backgrounds of abuse or
Offender data neglect were compared to those of a
rectangular file structure matched control group with no official record
1,308 cases of abuse or neglect. Variables contained in
37 variables Part 1 Include demographic Information (age,
66-unlt-Iong record race. sex, and date of birth). In Part 2, Infor-
1 record per case mation Is presented on the abuse/neglect Inci-
dent (type of abuse or neglect, duration of the
Incident, whether the child was removed from
the home, if so, for how long, results of the
placement, and whether the Individual Is still
alive). Part 3 contains family information (with

Delinquency 137
whom the child was living at the time of the in- Part 4
cident, family disruptions, and who reported Adult criminality
the abuse or neglect) and on the perpetrator rectangul~r file structure
of the Incident (relation to abused/neglected, 2,578 cases
age, race, sex, and whether living In the a variables
home of the victim). Part 4 contains Informa- aO-unit-long record
tion on the charges flied within adult arrest In- 1 record per case
cidents (occasion for arrest, mUltiple counts of
the same type of charge, year and location of Part 5
arrest, and type of offense or charge), and Juvenile criminality
Part 5 Includes Information on the ~harges rectangular file structure
filed within jwenlle arrest Incidents (year of ju- 1,101 cases
venile charge, number of arrests, and type of 5 variables
offense or charge). The unit of analysis for aD-unit-long record
Parts 1 through 3 Is the Individual at age 11 or 1 record per case
younger, for Part 4 the charge within the adult
arrest Incldont, and for Part 5 the charge
within the jwenlle arrest Incident. Class IV
Wo~gang, Marvin E., Robert M. Flgllo, and
Universe: All children under 12 years of ago
during the period 1967-1972 in a metropolitan Thorsten Sell;n
area in the Midwest. Delinquency In a birth cohort In
Sampling: Prospective cohorts research design Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
matched with a control group cohort. 1945-1963: Individual file
(ICPSR 7729)
Note: The data contain duplicate case num-
bers. Parts 2 and 3 appear to contain a large
amount of missing data. The data apply only Delinquency in a birth cohort In
to reported and substantiated cases of child- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
hood victimization. Misdemeanor criminal be- 1945-1963: Offenses file
havior for individuals may not show up In the (ICPSR 7729)
records checked.

Extent of collection: 5 data files This Is a study of the delinquent behavior of


9,945 males who were born In 1945 and re-
Card image data format sided In the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylva-
nia, from at least their tenth to their eight-
Part 1 eenth birthdays. Data were collected for the
Demographic years 1945-1963 from police, court and
1,575 cases school records. Information was obtained on
6 variables the extent and seriousness of delinquent ac-
aO-unlt-long record tivities, educational progress, and socioeco-
1 record per case nomic and demographic characteristics. The
data collection effort began in 1964 and the
Part 2 data are arranged in two files: one by individu-
Abuse/neglect als and one by offenses. The first file contains
rectangular file structure 9,944 records and has approximately 50 vari-
90a cases ables and the second file corltains the 10,214
2a variables offenses committed by the subjects, with ap-
aD-unit-long record proximately 40 variables for each case. Class II
3 records per case

Part 3
Family and perpetrator
rectangular file structure
90a cases
30 variables
aO-unit-long record
2 records per case

138 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


ZIII, Nicholas, Frank Furstenberg, Jr., and Part 1
James Peterson Merged 1976 and 1981 data
rectangular file structure
National survey of children: Wave Ij 1,423 cases
1976, Wave II, 1981, and Wave III, 1987 approximately 1,336 variables
3,574-unlt-long record
(ICPSR 8670) 1 record per case
Summary: The purpose of this study was to Part 2
assess the physical, social, and psychological 1976 data
well-being of American children, to develop a rectangUlar file structure
national profile of the way children In the 2,301 cases
United States live, to permit analysis of the re- approximately 1,159 variables
lationships between the conditions of chil- 1oo-unlt-Iong record
dren's lives and measures of child develop- 27 records per case
ment, and to examine the effects of marital
disruption on the development of children and Part 3
on the operation of single and multi-parent Merged 1976, 1981, and 1967 data
famllles. Informatlon Is provided on the child's rectangular file structure
well-being, family, experiences with family dIs- 1,427 cases
ruption, behavior, physIcal health, and mental 4,080 variables
health. Class IV 80-unlt-long record
106 records per case
UnIverse: Children living In households In the
48 contiguous states between the ages of Related Publications:
seven and eleven, or born between Septem- Peterson, J.L., etal.
ber 1, 1964 and December 31, 1969. "Marital disruption, parent-chUd relation-
ships, and behavioral problems In chil-
Note: The first file, which contains dala from dren.· Journal of Marriage and the Family
both the 1976 and 1981 surveys, Includes 48 (May 1986).
several derived varIables. The second file, Moore, K.A., et aI.
containing only 1976 data, Is logical record ·Parental attitudes and the occurrence of
length data but has 27 records per case. early sexual activity.· Journal of Marriage
and the Family 48 (November 1986).
Extent of collection: 3 data files
logical record length data format

Delinquency 139
Governmental response to crime

Jacob, Herbert with 1 card per case. The state laws file has
45 variables and 533 cases with 2 cards per
Governmental responses to crime In case. The media data flies concern attentive-
the United States, 1948-1978 ness to crime and criminal Justice Issues as
covers In the news media. The 9 city files (for
(ICPSR 8076) all cities with the exception of Newark) have
140 variables and approximately 670 cases
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States each. There are 3 cards per case, Class II
Depmment of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number Is 78-NI-AX-0096.
Summary: The Governmental Responses to
Crime ProJect was Initiated In October, 1978, Pogue, Thomas F.
as a result of the rising crime rate In the
United States and the wide variety of pro- Deterrent effects of arrests and
grams seeking to contain It. The project Inves- Imprisonment In the United States,
tigated the growth of crime and the ways In 1960-1977
which local governments responded to crime
during the period from 1948 to 1978 by ana- (ICPSR 7973)
lyzing policy responses to the rise In crime In
10 American cities: Atlanta, Boston, Houston, This study was sponsored by the United States
Indianapolis, Minneapolis, Newark, Oakland, Department of JU$~ce, National Institute of Jus-
Philadelphia, Phoenix and San Jose. The ma- tice. The grant number!s 79-NJ-AX-001S.
Jor areas of research Included the nature of
the rise In crime In the United States, atten- Summary: Emerging from the tradition of
tiveness to crime, connections between struc- econometric models of deterrence and crime,
tures and patterns of urban governments and this study attempts to obtain Improved esti-
their responses to crime, and urban communi- mates of how crime rates are affected by the
ties' principal responses to crime. This data apprehension and punishment of persons
collection Is contained In 5 parts: Baseline, charged with criminal activity. this stUdy em-
Ten Cltt, Local Ordinances, State Laws, and ploys avallable statistical toohnlques to esti-
Media Data. There are eighteen files: five con- mate relationships between $anction levels
taln SPSS control statement~ and the remain- and reported crime rates for particular geo-
Ing thirteen filas contaln the corresponding graphic areas (states and Standard Metropoli-
data The base/lne data file contalns Informa- tan Statistical Areas-SMSAs) and to assess
tion on all cities having a population of 50,000 the extent to which estimated relationships
or more In 1950, 1960, or 1970. These data can be plausibly Interpl'eted as evidence that
constitute a base/lne with which the 10 cities the sanctions have deterrent effects. Exploit-
can be compared to other cities In the United Ing a richer data base than has been pre-
States. There are 57 variables and 12 276 viously available In limited cross-sectional
cases with 3 cards per case. The ten ~ity file s('.lmplas,lt was possible to test far lags in the
contalns Information on changes In the activi- response of crime rates to sanction levels'
ties, focus, and resources of local police de- the stability of the relationships estimated '
partments, courts, prosecutorlal systems, and from data for Individual cross section years;
correctional Institutions In the 10 cities named and the hypothesis that adults respond differ-
above. There are approximately 58 variables ently to sanctions than do juveniles. Only
and 310 cases, with 3 cards per case (10 cit- property crimes (burglary, larceny, robbery,
les, 31 observations). The city ordinance and and auto theft) were considered. this data
state law files contaln data on public policy re- collection is contained In two files. State Data
sponses from examination of changes In ordi- consists of a state data panel of observations
nances and laws over time. The city ordi- from each of the 50 states covering the years
nance fila has 37 variables, and 422 cases 1960-1977. The approximately 484 variables

Governmental response to crime 141


contain InfOimation on crime rates, clearance procedures, outcome statistics on cltlJen calls
rates, length of time served, and probability of (suspects arrested, property recovered, and
Imprisonment; socioeconomic factors such as suspects prosecuted), reward setting and dis-
unemployment ra~es, population levels and In- tribution, and program relations with media,
come levels; sentencing statutes, prison popu- law enforcement, and the board of directors.
lation levels and estimated capacity; and Also available In this file are data on citizen
state and local expenditures for police protec- calls received by the program, the program's
~on. SMSA Data conslste of SMSA panel for arrests and clearances, and the program's ef-
77 SMSAs covering the years 1960-1977. fects on Investigation procedure. The merged
The approximately 232 variables contain Infor- file contains data from pollee coordinators
mation on crime rates, clearance rates, length and from Crime Stoppers board members.
of time served and probability of Imprison- Other variables Include city population, per-
ment; socioeconomic factors such as unem- cent of households living In poverty, percent
ployment rates, population levels and Income of white popUlation, number of Uniform Crime
levels; and taxation and expenditure Informa- Reports (UCA) Part I crimes Involved, mem-
tion. Class II bership and performance of the board, fund
raising methods, and ratings of the program.
Class IV
Universe: All Crime Stoppers programs In the
Rosenbaum, Dennis P., Althur J. Luriglo, United States.
and Paul J. Lavrakas
Crime stoppers: A national evaluation Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine-
readable documentation
of program operations and effects,
1984 Card Image data format
(ICPSR 9349)
Part 1
This study was sponsored by the United states Police coordinator file
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- rectangular filt' structure
tice. The grant number Is 83-IJ-CX-KOSO. 194 cases
296 variables
Summary: The goal of this data collection 80-unlt-long record
was to answer three basic questions about 6 records per case
the Crime stoppers (CS) program, a program
encouraging citizen Involvement In averting Part 2
crIme and apprehending suspects. First, how Merged file
does Crime Stoppers work In theory and In rectangular file structure
practice? Second, what are the opinions and 203 cases
attitudes of program participants toward the 596 variables
Crime Stoppers program? Third, how do vari- 80-unit-long record
ous components of the program such as re- 27 records per case
wards, anonymity, use of informants, and me-
dia participation affect criminal justice Related Publications:
outcome measures such as citizen calls and Rosenbaum, D.P., A.J. Lurlglo, and P.J.
arrests? This collection marks the first at- Lavrakas
tempt to examine the operational procedures ·Crlme stoppers-a national evaluation"
and effectiveness of Crime Stoppers pro- (research In brief). Washington, DC: Na-
grams In the United states. Police coordina- tional Institute of Justice, 1986.
tors and board chairs of local Crime Stoppers Rosenbaum, D.P., A.J. Lurlgio, and P.J.
programs described their perceptions of and Lavrakas
attitudes toward the Crime stoppers program. "Crime stoppers: A national evaluation of
The Police Coordinator File InclUdes vari- program operations and effects" (execu-
ables such as the police coordinator's back- tive summary). Evanston, !L: Northwest-
ground and experience, program develcp- ern University, Center for Urban Affairs
ment and support, everyday operations and and PoliGY Research, 1986.

142 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Illegal corporate behavior
-
Block, Michael K and Fredrick C. Nold Part 1
Month, city·month data
Deterrent effects of antitrust rectangular file structure
enforcement [United States]: The 2,136 cases
ready-mix concrete Industry, 1970-19BO 32 variables
166·unlt·long record
(ICPSR 9040) 1 record per case
Tlis study was sponsored by the United States Part 2
Depcrtment of Justice, NatloneJ Institute of Jus- Quarler, clty·quarter data
tice. The gralt number Is 8O·IJ·CX·0105. rectangular file structure
836 cases
Summary: These data were collected to ex· 37 variables
plore the relationship between profit levels In 158·unlt·long record
the concrete Industry and the antitrust en· 1 record per case
forcement activities undertaken by the United
States Department of Justice (DOJ) in 19 cit· Part 3
las over an 11·yaar period. The data collec· Annual, city-year data
tlon is composed mainly of published aggre· rectangull:lr file structure
gate data on ready·mlx concrete costs and 228 cases
prices. Profits and estimates of collusive 35 variables
markups In this Industry can be calculated 153·unit·long record
and related to antitrust enforcement efforts. 1 record per case
Variables InclUde measures of wages and mao
terlals costs, prices of concrete products, Related Publications:
number 01' oullding permits Issued, gasoline C!abault, J.M. and M.K. Block
prices, the consumer price Index, number of ·Sherman Act Indic.1ments, 1955·1980."
laborers employed, unemployment rates, New York, NY: Federal Legal Publications,
measures of change In the Department of 1981.
Justice's Antitrust Division budget, change In Block, M.K., F.C. Nold, and J.G. Sidak
number of DOJ permanent enforcement per· "The deterrent effect of antitrust enforce·
sonnel, and number of antitrust criminal ac· ment." Journal of Political Economy 89
tions Initiated by DOJ against readY'mix can· (1981),429.445.
crete users, producers of related products,
producers of substitutes for ready·mlx prod·
ucts, and ready·mix producers. Class IV

Sampling: The sample consists of 19 repre· Clinard, Marshall B. and Peter C. Yeager
sentative cities In the United States. Illegal corporate behavior, 1975·1976
Note: The data collection is a pooled time·se· (lCPSR 7855)
ries of cross·sections: data are presented for
the years 1970·1980, although data for 1969 This study was sponsored by the United States
are available for a limited number of vari- Department of Justice, Na1lon~ Institute of Jus-
ables. The three files supply data for varying tice. The grant number is 77·NI·GG·OOO9.
units of time (months, quarter, years).
Summary: This twa·part study represents the
Extent of collection: 3 data files first large·scale comprehensive Investigation
of corporate violations. It examines the extent
Logical record length data format and nature of these illegal activities In terms
of the corporate structure and economic set·
ting in Which the violations occurred. The

Illegal corporate behavior 143


study has concentrated on an empirical inves- Related Publication:
tigation of the 582 largest publicly owned cor- Clinard, MarshailB.
porations in the United States: 477 manufac- "Illegal corporate behavior." Washington,
turing, 18 wholesale, 66 retall and 21 service. D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office,
A major focus has been on manufacturing en- 1979. Stock Number 027-000-00843-7.
terprises. Corporations in banking, Insuiance,
transpottation, communication and utilities
have been excluded because of the unusual
nature of these businesses (i.e. they are sub- Wheeler, Stanton, David Weisburd, and
j'lCt to strict regulation and/or licensing). The
1975 annual sales of the corporations studied Nancy80de
ranged from $300 million to more than $45 Nature and sanctioning of white collar
billion, with an average sales volume of $1.7 crime, 1976-1978: Federal Judical
t::Uon for parent firms. The data in Part 2: Vio-
lations/Sanctions File covered all enforce- districts
ment actions that could be secured, initiated (ICPSR 8989)
or imposed by 24 federal agencies during
1975 and 1976. Variablesinelude number This study was sponsored by the United States
and types of violations, investigating agency, Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
and sanctions imposed. In addition to the col- tice. The grant number is 78-NI-AX-0017.
lection of data on the Illegal activities of the
corporations, the researchers collected eco- Summary: This data collection, one of only a
nomic data on the corporations as well as In- small number available on federal white collar
dustry-level economic data These are pre- crime, focuses on white collar criminals and
sented In a Part 1: Economic Analysis Data the nature of their offenses. The data contain
File. The variables in the Economic Data File descriptive information about the defendant in-
include Net Incomeffotal Assets, Working eluding age, sex, marital status, past criminal
Capital/ Total Assets, and SaJes/Total Assets. history, neighborhood environment, educa-
The da~aset is available in card image and tion, and employment history. Further Informa-
OSiRIS formats. Class II tion is provided on the source of conviction,
offense category, number of counts in the in-
Note: This study was originally called Illegal dictments, maximum prison term and maxi-
corporate behavior, 1979. However, it has mum fine associated with the offense, the du-
now been retitled to reflect the date of collec- ration and geographic spread of the offense,
tion and analysis of the data, rather than the numbor of participants, number persons ar-
date of publication. rested number of businesses indicted, and
spous~'s employment. The defendant's socio-
Extant of collection: 2 data files + machlne- economic status is measured using the Dun-
readable documentation + SPSS control can index. The data are limited to crimes com-
cards mitted solely by convicted Individuals and do
not Include defendants that are organizations
OSIRIS and card image data formats, with or groups. Class IV
SPSS control cards for each
Universe: Convicted white collar criminals in
Part 1 federal judicial districts representing metropoli-
Economic analysis data file tan centers, specifically, Central California,
rectangular file structure Northern Georgia, Northern Illinois, Maryland,
461 cases Southern New York, Northern Texas, and
128 variables Western Washington.
366-unlt-long record
10 records per case Sampling: A random sample of federa! crime
offenders convicted of one of ten statutory of-
Part 2 fenses including securities fraud, antitrust vio-
Violations/sanctions lations, bribery, bank embezzlement, mall and
rectangular file structure wire fraud, tax fraud, false claims and state-
2,230 cases ments, credit and lending institution fraud,
1"15 variables postal theft, and postal forgery was drawn
632-unit-long record f.om several judicial districts. All offenders
6 records per case convicted of securities fraud and antitrust
cases in all of the federal districts during the
three fiscal years were examined, thus yield-

144 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


lng a sample containing a higher proportlon of rectangular file structure
these offenders. 1,910 cases
296 variables
Note: The appendlees mentioned In the docu· 483·unlt·\on9 record
mentation CU'a not presently avaJlable. The 1 record per case
data In columns 452·467 and 471·483 are
undocumented. The FBI, PSI and Docket Related Publications:
variables have been blanked for reasons of Welsburd, D., S. Wheeler, N. Bode, and E.
confidentiality. Waring
The nature and sanctionIng of white collar
Extent of collection: 1 data file + SAS control crime, forthcoming.
cards Wheeler, S., and M.L Rothmann
"The organization as weapon In white col·
Logical record length data format lar crime." Michigan Law Review SO
(1982),1403·1426,
Wheeler, S., D. Welsburd, and N. Bode
·Sentencing the white collar offender:
Rhetoric and reality." American Soclologl·
cal Review 47 (1982), 641·659.

Illegal corporate behavior 145


Official statistics

Baumer, Terry and Michael D. Carrington Note: The Incident-based file Includes
merged data of victim offices from the office-
Robbe,y of financial Institutions In based file, robbery Incident data, and case
Indiana, 1982-1984 disposition data The merged office data con·
tain variables Identical to those available In
(ICPSR 9310) the office-based file.
This study was sponsored by the United States Extent of collection: 2 data files
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number Is 83-IJ-CX-0056. Card Image data format
Summary: The goals of this data collection Part 1
were to provide information on robbery-re- Bank office data
lated security measures employed by finan- rectangular file structure
clallnstitutions, to Identify factors that contrib- 358 cases
ute to robbery, and to study the correlates of 194 variables
case disposition and sentence length of con- 80-unlt-long record
victed robbers. The collection compares bank- 4 records per case
Ing Institutions that have been robbed with
those bank offices that have not been robbed Part 2
to provide information on factors that contrib- Robbery incident data
ute to these robberies. The office-based file in- rectangular file structure
cludes variables designed to measure gen- 223 cases
eral office characteristics, staff preparation 364 variables
and tralnlng, security measures, charac- BO-unit-Iong record
teristics of the area In which the banking Insti- 8 records per case
tution is located, and the robbery history of
each institution. The Incident-based file in- Related Publication:
cludes variables such as the robber's method Baumer, Terry, Michael D. Carrington, and
of operation and behavior, the employees' re- Emily Marshman
actions, the characteristics of the office at the "The robbery of financial institutions" (final
time of the robbery, and the apprehension of report). Washington, DC: Nat~onallnstitute
the offender. Also included Is Information on of Justice, 1986.
the status of the investigation, reasons in-
volved in solving the robbery, status of prose-
cution, ultimate prosecution, and length of
sentence. Class IV
Bennett, Richard R.
Universe: Banking and financial institutions in
Indiana. Correlates of crime: A study of 52
nat/ons, 1960-1984
Sampling: Victim institutions include banks (ICPSR 9258)
and savings and loan associations in the
state of Indiana that were robbed between Summary: This collection contains data on
January 1, 1982 and June 30, 1984. A com- crime and on relevant social, economic, and
parison group of 200 financial Institutions was political measures hypothe:::ized to be related
randomly selected from the remaining nonvle- to crime for 52 nations OW" ~ 25-year period.
tim offices in Indiana. Five of the nonvietim These time-series data are divided into five
sample were not Included In the file because substantive areas: offense, offender, and na-
their data were not available. tional social, political, and economic data Na-

Official statistics 147


lions Included In 1119 collection were drawn ment murder analysIs files for the years 1965-
from seven major regions of the world. Class IV 1981. Data are provided on place of homi-
cide, age, race, and sex of victim, time of oc-
Universe: All nations In the world. currence, type of weapon used, age, race,
and sex of offender, and relationshIp of vIctim
Sampling; This Is not a random sample, but to the offender. Class IV
the 52 nations In the collection were drawn
from the seven major regions of the world Universe: All homicides In Chicago Police De-
and represent a wide range of levels of devel- partment murder analysis files from 1965
opment, types of economy, political environ- through 1981.
ments, and criminal justice system structures.
Three criteria for oelecting the sample were Note: Because the data were collected In
employed: (1) the nation had to be a member many stages by many people over a long pe-
of INTERPOL between the years 1960 and riod of time, the codas used have undergone
1984, (2) the nation had to report crime data repeated revisions. In most cases, these revi-
to the Secretariat of INTERPOL between the sIons have been added to the coding catego-
years 1960 and 1984, and (3) the nation ries without changing the existing codes.
could skip no more than three of INTERPOL's Some variables were added to the study In
two-year crime data reporting periods. later years. This Is especially true of variables
attempting to capture sentence Information,
Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine- which was very seldom present In the Chi-
readable documentation cago Police Department analysis reports.

Card Image data format Extent of collection: 1 data file

Part 1 Card Image data format


United States to Kenya data
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
26 cases 12,875 cases
63 variables 54 variables
80-unlt-long record 80-unit-long record
150 records per case 1 record per case

Part 2
Tanzania to Fiji data
rectangular file structure
26 cases Bureau of the Census,
63 variables U.S. Department of Commerce
80-unit-long record Census of population and housing,
150 records per case
1970 [United States]: Persons In
Related Publications: Institutions and other group quarters
Bennett, Richard R., and Louise Shelley by age, sex, race, and Spanish origin
·Criminalite et developpement econo-
mlque: Une analyse Internatlonale longitu- (ICPSR 8342)
dinale." Anna/es de Vacresson 22 (1985),
13-31. Census of population and housing,
Simon, Rita J., and Sandra Baxter 1980 [United States]: Group quarters
Women and violent crime. Beverly Hills, population by age, sex, race, and
CA: Sage Publications, 1989. Spanish origin
(ICPSR8341)

These summary statistics tiles, one for 1970


Block, Carolyn Rebecca, and the Illinois and one for 1980, were compiled by the Bu-
Criminal Justice Information Authorny reau of the Census and both contain data on
Homicides In Chicago, '1965·1981 the same information. The data are a com-
plete or 100 percent count of all persons In
(ICPSR 8941) group quarters (all persons not living in house-
holds are considered to be living In group
Summary: This dataset contains information quarters) by sex and single years of age up to
on every homicide In ChIcago Police Depart- 74 with a category for 75 and over as well as

148 National Arichive of Criminal Justice Data


a total. The distribution Is repeated for 18 Note: Users are advised that the codebook
races Including Hispanic groups, Group quar- that the Census Bureau has Issued for use
ters population Includes persons In Institu- with this dataset Is a preliminary one and
tional group quarters such as homfls, does not Include codes and definitions for
schools, hospitals, or wards for the physically states, counties, and cities. The codes and
and mentally handicapped; hospitals or wards definitions may be listed off the tape or users
for mental, tuberculoc, or chronically III pa- may refer to other sources such as the
tients; homes for unwed mothers; nursing, printed version of the COUNTY AND CITY
convalescent, and rest homes for the aged DATA BOOK, 1988. For each case In the
and dependent; orphanages; and correctional Counties Data file, there are two 1,239-char-
Institutions. Noninstitutional group quarters in- acter records.
clude rooming and boarding houses; general
hospitals, Including nurses' and Interns' dormi- Extent of collection: 3 data files + machine-
tories; college student dormitories; religious readable documentation
group quarters; and similar housing. Data are
avallable for all counties and independent cit- logical record length data format
ies In the United states. The data for 1980
are contained in one file with a logical record Part 1
length of 2,088 characters. The 1980 data file Counties data
Includes 56,466 records. The data for 1970 rectangular file structure
are contained In one file with a logical record 3,191 cases
length of 2,040 characters. There are 60,159 215 variables
records In the 1970 data file. Class IV 1,239-unlt-long record
2 records per case

Part 2
Counties data dictionary
Bureau of the Census,
rectangular file structure
U.S. Department of Commerce 98-unlt-long record
County and city data book [United
States},1988
Part 3
Counties footnotes
(ICPSR 9251) rectangular file structure
19-unlt-long record
Summary: This collection presents in com-
puter-readable form the data Items used to Part 4
produce the corresponding printed volume of Cities data
the COUNTY AND CITY DATA BOOK, i988. rectangular file structure
Included Is a broad range of statistical Infor- 1,008 cases
mation, made avallable by federal agencies 132 variables
and national associations, for counties, cities, 1,498-unit-long record
and places. Information also is provided for 1 record per case
the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and for
the United States as a whole. The dataset is Part 5
comprised of seven files: a county file, a city Cities data dictionary
file, and a place file, with footnote files and rectangular file structure
data dictionaries for both the county and t'1e 86-unit-long record
city files. The county data file contains infor-
mation on areas such as age, agriculture, Part 6
banking, construction, crime, education, fed- Cities footnotes
eral expenditures, personal income, popula- rectangUlar file structure
tion, and vital statistics. Tha city data file in- 20-unlt-long record
cludes variables such as city government,
climate, crime, housing, labor force and em- Part 7
ployment, manUfactures, retail trade, and Places data
service Industries. Included In the place data rectangUlar file structure
file are items on population and money In- 9,593 cases
come. Class IV 4 variables
125-uoit-long record
Universe: The universe varies from item to 1 record per case
item within the files, e.g., all persons, all hous-
ing units, all local governments, etc.

Official statistics 149


Related Publication: Part 5: Offenses known and clearances
Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of by arrest, 1981
Commerce Part 6: Property stolen and recovered,
"County and city data book, 1988." Wash- 1981
ington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Of- Part 7: Supplementary homicide report
fice, n.d. (SHR),1981
Part 8: Police employee (LEOKA) data,
1981
Part 9: Offenses known and clearances
Uniform crime reports series by arrest, 1982
Part 10: Property stolen and recovered,
The Federal Bureau of Investigation compiled 1982
the Uniform Crime Reports to serve as peri- Part 11: Supplementa'ry homicide report
odic nationwide assessments of reported (SHR),1982
crime not avallable elsewhere in the criminal Part 12: Police employee (LEOKA) data,
Justice system. By 1980, there were approxi- 1982
mately 16,000 law enforcement agencies con- Part 13: Offenses known and clearances
tributing reports either directly or through their by arrest, 1979
state reporting program. The agencies re- Part 14: Property stolen and recovered,
ported the number of offenses that became 1979
known to them on a monthly basis, according Part 15: Supplementary homicide report
to the Crime Index categories of serious of- (SHR),1979
fenses: murder, forcible rapfl, robbery, aggra- Part 16: Police employee (LEOKA) data,
vated assault, burglary, larceny-theft and mo- 1979
tor vehicle theft. This count is taken from a Part 17: Offenses known and clearances
record received by the law enforcement by arrest, 1983
agency from victims or other sources and/or Part 18: Property stolen and recovered,
those discovered by officers. These data may 1983
include "offenses known", "offenses cleared" Part 19: Supplementary homicide report
(by arrest or other exceptional means), ·per- (SHR),1983
son arrested", or other law enforcement re- Part 20: Police employee (LEOKA) data,
lated information. The Uniform Crime Reports 1983
study descriptions that follow this summary Part 21 : Offenses known and clearances
are organized by the years covered in each by arrest, 1978
particular dataset rather than by ICPSR study Part 22: Property stolen and recovered,
number. 1978
Part 23: Supplemental homicide report,
1978
Part 24: Police employee (LEOKA) data,
1978
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Part 26: Offenses known and clearances
U.S. Department of Justrce by arrest, 1984
Part 27: Property stolen and recovered,
Uniform crime reporting program data: 1984
[United States] Part 28: Supplemental homicide report,
(ICPSR 9028) 1984
Part 29: Police employee (LEOKA) data,
1984
Data from the FBI Uniform Crime Report
Part 30: Offenses known and clearances
(UCR) Master tapes which cover every
by arrest, 1977
monthly return submitted by law enforcement
Part 31 : Property stolen and recovered,
agencies in the United states have been ex-
1977
panded to include 1975 through 1988.
Part 32: Supplementary homicide report,
1977
Part 1: Offenses known and clearances
Part 33: Police employee (LEOKA) data,
by arrest, 1980
1977
Part 2: Property stolen and recovered,
Part 35: Offenses known and clearances
1980
by arrest, 1985
Part 3: Supplementary homicide report
Part 36: Property stolen and recovered,
(SHR),1980
1985
Part 4: Police employee (LEOKA) data,
1980

150 National Arichive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 37: Supplementary homicide report, cause some parts of this data collection are
1985 very large, these data are normally available
Part 38: Police employee (LEOKA) data, only In OSIRIS and logical record length for-
1985 mats. Class II
Part 39: Property stolen and recovered,
1976 Related Publications:
Part 40: Supplementary homicide report, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Depart-
1976 ment of Justice
Part 41: Police employee (LEOKA) data, "Crime in the United States: Uniform crime
1976 reports for the United States-1980." Wash-
Part 44: Property stolen and recovered, Ington, D.C.: U.S. Governrrlent Printing Of-
1986 fice, 1981. {Annual publlcation1
Part 45: Supplementary homicide report, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S, Depart-
1986 ment of Justice
Part 46: Police employee (LEOKA) data, ·Uniform crime reporting handbook."
1986 Washington. D.C.: U.S. Government Print-
Part 49: Offenses known and clearances Ing Office, 1980.
by arrest, 1976
Part 50: Offenses known and clearances
by arrest, 1986
Part 51 : Offenses known and clearances
by arrest, 1975 Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Part 52: Property stolen and recovered, U.S. Department of Justice
1975 Uniform crime reporting program data
Part 53: Supplementary homicide report,
1975 [United States], 1966·1976
Part 54: Police employee (LEOKA) data, (ICPSR 7676)
1975
Part 55: Offenses known and clearances For the years 1966-76, the data are in two
by arrest, 1987 files per year. The data included In Part I are
Part 56: Property stolen and reco"ered, arranged in 11 files, one for each year, with
1987 1,129 variables per year. There are also 11
Part 57: Supplementary homicide report, files of data in Part II, one file for each year,
1987 with 328 variables per year. Class III
Part 58: Police employee (LEOKA) data,
1987
Pm159: Offenses known and clearances
by arrest, 1966
Part 60: Property stolen and recovered, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
1988 U.S. Department of Justice
Part 61: Supplementary homicide report,
1988 Uniform crime reporting program data
Part 62: Police employee (LEOKA) data, [United States]: County level arrest
1988 and offenses data, 1977-1983
All these data were collected at the agency (ICPSR 8703)
level with the exception of the data for the
Supplementary Homicide Report which were Summary: The files in this collection contain
collected at the incident leVel. Information on counts of arrests and offenses for UCR Index
victims and offenders such as gender. race, crimes: murder, rape, robbery, assault, bur-
age, relationship, and circumstances is in- glary, larceny, auto theft, and arson. County
cluded for each homicide "incident: Incidents populations are also reported. Class III
are Identified by homicide type, month of oc-
currence, ORI code, situation type, and popu- Universe: Local law enforcement agencies in
lation size and group. For the agency-level the United States.
data, agencies are identified by FBI ORI
code, geographic region, state, populOltion Note: Data have been aggregated to the
size and group, and an alphabetic agency county level. Within each county, data for
name variable. The data within each general agencies reporting six to eleven months of in-
file type have fixed record lengths with the ex- formation were welghted to produce 12-
ception being the Supplementary Homicide month equivalents. Agencies reporting less
Report which has variable length records. Be- than six months of data were excluded from

Official statistics 151


the aggregation. Data from agencies report- counties proportionate to their share of the
Ing only statewide figures were allocated to state population.
counties proportionate to their share of the
state population. Extent of collection: 2 data files

Extent of collection: 14 data files Logical record length and card image data
formats
Card Image and logical recOl'd length data
formats Part 1
Arrest, 1984
Parts 1,3,5,7,9,11,13 rectangular file structure
Arrest files, 19n·1983 3,125 cases
rectangular file structure 19 variables
3,124 to 3,129 cases per part 83-unit-long record
19 variables 1 record per case
B2-unit-long record
1 record per case Part 2
Offenses,1984
Parts 2,4,6,B,1 0,12,14 rectangular file structure
Offenses files, 19n·1983 3,119 cases
rectangular file structure 17 variables
3,123 to 3,127 cases per part BO-unit-Iong record
17 variables 1 record per case
BO-unlt-Iong record
1 record per case Related Publication:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Depart-
Related Publication: ment of Justice
Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Depart- "Uniform crime reporting handbook."
ment of Justice Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Print-
"Uniform crime reporting handbook." ing Office, 1980.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Print-
Ing Office, 1980.

Federal Bureau of Investigation,


U.S. Department of Justice
Federal Bureau of Investigation,
U.S. Department of Justice Uniform crime reporting program data
[United States]: Detailed arrest and
Uniform crime reporting program data offense data for 321 counties, 1988
[United States]: County level arrest
and offenses data, 1984 (lCPSR 9470)

(ICPSR B714) Summary: The files In this collection contain


counts of arrests and offenses for Part I and
Summary: The files In this collection contain Part II offenses: murder, rape, robbery, as-
counts of arrests and offenses for UCR index sault, burglary, larceny, auto theft, arson, for-
crimes: murder, rape, robbery, assault, bur- gery, fraud, embezzlement, vandalism, weap-
glary, larceny, auto theft, and arson. County ons violations, sex offenses, drug and alcohol
populations are also reported. Class III abuse violations, gambling, vagrancy, curfew
violations, and runaways. County populations
Universe: Local law enforcement agencies in are also reported. Data are Included for 321
the United States. counties in the United States. Class 11/

Note: Data have been aggregated to the Universe: All law enforcement agencies in the
county level. Within each county, data fer United States.
agencies reporting six to eleven months of in-
formation were weighted to produce 12- Sampling: Counties were selocted in order to
month equivalents. Agencies reporting less match those chosen for the National Judi·
than six months of data were excluded from cial Reporting Program, 1988 (ICPSR
the aggregation. Data from agencies report- 9449) sponsored by the U.S. Dept. of Justice,
ing only statewide figures were allocated to Bureau of Justice Statistics.

152 National Arichive of Criminal Justice Data


Note: Data have been aggregated to the Bureau of Justice Statistics
county level. Within each county, data for "Felony sentences In state courts, 1986'-
agencies reporting 6 to 11 months of Informa- Washlngteln, DC: U.S. Government Print-
tion were weighted to produce 12-rnonth Ing Office, 1989.
equivalents. Data from agencies reporting Federal Bureau of Investigation
only statewide figures were allocated to coun- "Uniform crime reporting handbook."
ties proportionate to their share of the state Washington, DC: U.S. Government Print-
population. These files are a subset of Uni- Ing Office, 1980.
form Crime Reports: County Level De-
tallod Arrest and Offense Data, 1986
(ICPSR 9335), and were created to be used
with National Judicial Reporting Program,
1988: [United States] (ICPSR 9449), by the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
U.S. Dept. of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statis- U.S. Department of Justice
tics. Users wishing to replicate figures in the Uniform crime reports: County level
Bureau of Justice Statistics report entltied
"Felony Sentences in State Courts, 1988" arrest and offense data, 1986
should use both this collootlon and /CPSR (ICPSR 9119)
9449.
Summary: The flies In this collection contain
Extent of co!lectior.: 4 data files tabulations of arrests and offenses for UnI-
form Crime Reports (UCR) Index crimes: mur-
logical record length data format der, rape, robbery, assault, burgla/Y, larceny,
auto theft, and arson. County populations are
Part 1 also reported. Class III
Arrests, all ogos,1988
rectangular file structure Universe: Law enforcement agencies In the
321 cases United States.
53 variables
229-unit-Iong record Note: Data have been aggregatod to the
1 record per case county level. Within each county, data for
agencies reporting six to 11 months of Infor-
Part 2 mation Were weighted to produce 12-rnonth
Arresls, adults, 1988 equivalents. Agencies reporting less than 6
rectangular file structure months of data were excluded from the aggre-
321 cases gatIon. Dala from agencies reportlng only state-
53 variables wide figures w~e allocated to counties propor-
229·unit·lang record tionate to fuelr share of the state popUlation.
1 record per case
Extent of collection: 2 data files
PartS
Arrests, juveniles, 1988 Card image and logical record length data
rectangular file structure formats
321 cases
53 variables Part 1
229-uniHong record Arrests, 1986
1 record per case rectangular file structure
3,133 cases
Part 4 19 variables
Crimes reported, 1988 82-unit-long record
rectangular file structure 1 record per case
321 cases
17 variables Part 2
73-unit-long record Offenses,1986
1 record per case rectangular file structure
3,129 cases
Related Publications: 17 variables
Lar,gM, Patrick A, and John N. Dawson 79-unit-long record
"Felony sentences in state courts, 1988." 1 record per case
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Print-
Ing Office, December 1990.

Official statistics 153


Related Publication: Part 3
Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Depart- Arrests, juveniles, 1988
ment of Justice rectangular file structure
"Uniform crime reporting handbook." 3,132 cases
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Print- 53 variables
Ing Office, 1980. 240-unll-long record
1 record per case

Part 4
Crimes reported, 1988
Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. rectangular file structure
Department of Justice 2,944 cases
Uniform crime reports: County level 17 variables
73-unlt-long record
detailed arrest and offense data, 1988 1 record per case
(ICPSR 9335)
Related Publications:
Summary: The flies In this collection contaln Federal BUi'eau of Investigation
counts of arrests and offenses for Part I and "Uniform crime reporting handbook."
Part II offenses: murder, rape, robbery, as- Washington, DC: U.S. Government Print-
sault, burglary, larceny, auto theft, arson, for- ing Office, 1980.
gery, fraud, embezzlement, vandalIsm, weap- Bureau of Justice Statistics
ons violations, sex offenses, drug and alcohol "Felony sentences In state courts, 1986.·
abuse violations, gambling, vagrancy, curfew Wasillngton, DC: U.S. Government Print-
violations, and runaways. County populations ing Office, 1989.
are also reported. Class III

Universe: All law enforcement agencies In the


United States. Federal Bureau of Investigation,
U.S. Department of Justice
Note: Data have been aggregated to the
county level. Within each county, data for Uniform crime reports: Arrest data for
agencies reporting 6 to 11 months of Informa- the 75 most populous counties In the
tion were weighted to produce 12-month United State.s, 1986
equivalents. Data from agencies reporting
only statewide figures were allocated to coun- (iCPSR 9163)
ties proportionate to their share of the state
population. Summary: The files In this collection contain
counts of arrests and offenses for Index
Extent of collection: 4 data files crimes and other offenses committed by
adults and jweniles. Types of offenses In-
logical record length data format clude murder, rape, robbery, assault, burglary,
larceny, auto theft, arson, forgery, fraud, em-
Part 1 bezzlement, vandalism, weapons violations,
Arrests, all ages, 1988 sex offenses, drug and alcohol abuse viola-
rectangular llIe structure tions, gambling, vagrancy, curfew, and run-
3,132 cases aways. County populations are also reported.
53 variables Class III
240-unlt-long record
1 record per case Universe: The 75 most !,opulous counties in
the United States.
Part 2
Arrests, adults, 1988 Note: Data have been aggregated to the
rectangular file structure county level. Within each county, data for
3,132 cases agencies reporting six to eleven months of In-
53 variables formation were weighted to produce 12-
240-unlt-long record month equivalents. Data from agencies re-
1 record per case porting only statewide figures were allocated
to counties proportionate to their share of the
state population.

154 National Arichive of Criminal Justice Data


Extent ot (:oUootiom '2 data files Extent of collection: 2 data flies
I..oglc.all'scord length data format logical record length data format
Part 1 Part 1
AduHs Adults
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
76 cases 121 cases
49 varIables 49 variables
238-unlt-long record 238·unlt-Ioog record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 2 Part 2
Juveniles Juvei'llIes
rectangular file structure rectangUlar file structure
7Scases 121 case~
49 variables 49 variables
238·unlt-fong record 238-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Related PublicatIon: Related PublicatIons:


federal Bureau of InvestigatIon, u.s .. Depart- Federal Bureau of Inve$tIgatloo, U.S. Depart-
ment of Justice ment of Justice
·Uniform crime reporting handbook." 'Unlform crime reporting handbook.~
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Print- Washington, DC: U.S. Government Ptlnt-
Ing Office. 1980, Ing Office, 1980.
Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Depart-
ment of Justice
"Felony sentences In state courts, 1986'-
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington. DC: U.S. Government Print-
Ing Office, 1989.
U.S. Department of Justice
Uniform crime reports: Arrest data for
121 counties in the United States, 1986
f!'ederQ/ Bureau of InvestIgation,
(ICPSR 9226) U.S. Depal1ment of Justice
Summary: The flies in this collection contain Uniform crime reports: County level
counts of arrests and offenses for Index detailed arrest and offense data, 1985
crimes and other offenses commItted by and 1987
adults and juveniles. Types of offenses In-
elude murder, rape, robbery, assault, burglary, (ICPSR 9252)
larceny, auto theft, arson, forgery, fraud, em-
bezzlement, vandalism, weapons violations, Summary: The files In this collection contain
sex offense~, drug and alcol'Jol abuse viola- counts of arrests and oftens~s for Part I and
tions, gambling, vl'Igrancy, curfew, and run~ Part II offenses: murder, rape, robbery, as·
aways. County popu/alions are also reported. sault, burglary, lercmy, aula th0ft, arson, for-
Class 1lI gery, fraud, embo7,zlement, vandalism, weap-
ons violations, sex offenses, drug and alcohol
Note: Data have been aggregated to the abuse violations, gambling, vagrancy, curfew,
o,unty level. Withln each count)', data for Md runaways. County populations aloo are
agencies reporting six to 11 months of Infor- reported. Class III
mation ware weighted to produce 12-month
equivalents. Data from agencies .eporting Unlver$e: All law enforcement agencies In the
only statewide figures wer(3 allocated to coun- United States.
ties proportionate to their share 01 the state
population. A related data collection contain- Note: Data have been aggregated to the
ing a subset of these data is available from count}' level. Within I'lach county, data tor
lCPSR under the title Uniform crime re- agenclos reportirog sjx to eleven months of in-
ports: Al'n~st data for ~,e 75 most popu· lormatlon were weighted to produce twelve-
lous counties In the United States, 1986 month eqUivalents. Data from agencies re-
(ICPSR 9163).

Official statistics 155


porting only statewide figures were allocated Part 7
to counties proportionate to their share of the Arres~" JuvenUef): 1987
state population. rectanglJiar file structure
3,132 cases
Extent of collection: 8 data files 53 variables
245-unlt-long record
logical record length data format 1 record per case

Part 1 PartS
Arre2ts, all ages: 1985 Crimes reported: 1987
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
3,131 casas 3,130 cases
63 variables 17 variables
242-unlt-long record 74-unlt-lon9 record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 2 Related Publications:


Arrests, adults: 1985 Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Depart-
rectangular file structure ment of Justice
3,131 cases ·Unlform crime reporting handbook."
53 variables Washington, DC: U.S. Government Print-
242-unlt-long record Ing Office, 1980.
1 record per case Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Depart-
ment of Justice
Part 3 "Felony sentences in state courts, 1986."
Arrests, juveniles: 1985 Washington, DC: United States Govern-
rootangular file structure ment Printing Office, 1989.
3,131 cases
53 variables
242-unit-long record
1 record per case
Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Part 4 U.S. Department of Justice
Crimes reported: 1985 Uniform crime reports, 1966-1976:
rectangular file structure
3,130 cases Data aggregated by standard
17 variables metropolitan statistical areas
73-unlt-long record (IGPSR 7743)
1 record per case
A new file has been added to the Uniform
Part 5 Crime Reports collection. This dataset utilizes
Arrests, all ages: 1987 the FBI's Uniform Crime Reports statistics
rectangular file structure gathered from 1966-1976. It consists of an ag-
3,132 cases gregation of all relevant law enforcement re-
53 variables porting agencies into Standard Metropolitan
245-unlt-long record Statistical Areas, and corresponding approxi-
1 record per case mate aggregations of crime rates and disposi-
tions. Each case in this file Is part of a SMSA,
Part 6 with data including annual statistics of eight in-
Arrests, adults: 1987 dex crimes (murder, manslaughter, rape, rob-
rectangular file structure bery, assault, burglary, larceny and motor ve-
3,132 cases hicle theft). There are 291 SMSA's in the file
53 variables and 2,609 cases. Each case has 160 vari-
245-unlt-long record ables. The data were prepared by the Hoover
1 record per case Institution for Economic Studies of the Crimi-
nal Justice System, at Stanford University.
Class IV

156 National Arichive of Criminal Justice Data


Federal Bureau of Investigation, anees by Arrest. (2) Property Stolen and Re·
U.S. Department of Justice covered, (3) The Supplementary Homicide
and Bureau of the Census, Reports (SHR), and (4) Police Employee
(LEOKA) data. This collection contains Of·
U.S. Department of Commerce fenses Known and Clearances by Arrest data
Uniform crime reports, 195B-1969, and Includes monthly Informatlon on the num·
and county and city data books) 1962) ber of Crime Index offenses reported, the
number of offenses cleared by arrest or other
1967,1972: Merged data means, and the number of adults and Juve-
(ICPSR 7715) niles arrested in cities with populations over
250,000. The counts include ;;'l/I reports of In-
This datasat Includes selected variables and dex Crimes (excluding arson) recelvad from
cases from the Federal Bureau of Invostlga- Victims, from officers who discovered infrac·
tion's Uniform Crime Reports, 19513-1969, tiO!1'l, (,'j( (rom other sourceo. Class U
and the County and City Oala 800ks for
1962, 1967, and 1972. Data art) reported for Extent o~ coli@ction: 1 data file + machine-
all U.S. cWes with a population of 75,000 or readable do(ll.lmentation + $PSS Control
more In 1960. The data were taken from a da· Cerds
taset originally created by AJvln L. Jacobson,
with further processing by Colin Loftin. They logical record length data format with SPSS
were prepared for use In the ICPSR's Work· control cards
shop on Data Processing and Data Ma.nage-
ment In the Criminal Justice rleld during the roo~..i'Igular ilia structllre
summer of 1978. Data taken from the Uni- 1~9 cases
form Crime Reports Include numb ElI'S for ellCh 1,4SS variables
year on: the number of homicides, fc;Jrcibla 4,5OS·unlt·long record
rapes, robberies, aggravated assaults, burg!a. 1 record per CCMil;)
ries, larcenies over $50, and auto thefts. Also
Included Is the Total Crime Index, which Is the Related PvbHca:trons:
simple sum of ;;'l/I the crimes listed above, Cer- Federal Bura.tu of investigation
tain variables which describe population chw'- ·Crimsln the United States: Uniform crime
acterlstlcs and city finances have been taken reports ttl( the United States-1988."
from the 1962, 1967, end 1972 County and Washington, DC: U.S. Government Print-
City Data Books. The dataset contains 162 Ing Ofilce, 1989.
variables for 172 cases. Class Ii FEl{Jel'al Bureau of Investigation
·Unlform crime reporting handbook."
Related Publication: Washington, DC: U.S. Government Print-
Jacobson, Alvin L ing Office, 1980.
·Crlme trend:ll In southern and non·south·
ern citles: A twenty-year perspective." So-
cIa/ Forces (September 1975), 226·242.
Fox, James Alan and Glenn L. Pierce
Uniform crime reports [United States}:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Supplementary homicide reports,
Department of Justice 1976·1983
(ICPSR 8657)
Uniform crime reporting program data
[United $tates]: Offenses known and Summary: These uniform crime reports sup-
clearances by arrest In all cities with plementary homicide data provide incident-
populations over 250,000,1987·1988 level Information on criminal homicides includ-
ing information on the date, location,
(ICPSR 9336) circumstances, and method of offenses, as
well as demographic characteristics of victims
Summary: Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of and perpetrators and the relationship be-
Investigation has compiled the Uniform Crime tween the two. The data were provided
Reports (UCR) to serve as periodic nation- monthly to the Federal Bureau of Investiga-
wide assessments of reported crime not avail· tion (FBI) by local law enforcement agencies
able elsewhere in the criminal Justice system. participating In the FBI's Uniform Crime Re-
Each year, this Information is reported in four porting Program. In 1983, 97 by jurisdictions
types of files: (1) Offenses Known and Clear· that submitted supplementary homicide data

Official statistics 157


to the Uniform Crime Reporting Program. Summary: The data for this collection were
Coverage In 1976 had been 88. Class IV gathered from the 1970 and 1980 Census
and the 1970 through 1980 Uniform Crime
Universe: Homicides In the United States Reports. The unit of analysis In this dataset Is
from January 1976 through December 1983. cities, Included In the dataset are population
figures and arrest frequencies for selected
Note: These data were restructured, reformat- crimes for Atlanta, Georgia; Chicago, illinois;
ted, and cleaned at the Center for Applied So- DenvEr, Colorado: Knoxville, Tennessee; San
cial Research, Northeastern University, Bos- Jose, California; Spokane, Washington; and
ton, Massachusetts. Tucson, Arizona. There are two files for each
city listed above. One file contains arrest data
Extent of collection: 4 data files + SPSS con- for males and females of all ages, and the
trol cards other file contains popUlation data by sex and
age. The population data files have 247 vari-
Logical record length data format with SPSS ables, while the arrest flies contain '1,470 vari-
control cards ables. Arrest data are collooteo lor the follow·
Ing crimes: murder, forclbls rape, robbery,
Part 1 aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, motor
Agency aggregate vehicle theft, other assaults, arson, forgery,
rectangular file structure fraud, embezzlement, stolen property, vandal-
29,650 cases ism, weapons, pro.'3titutlon, other sex of-
9 variables fenses, opium abuse, marijuana abuse, gam-
133-unlt-long record bling, family offenses, drunk driving, liquor
1 record per case law violations, drunkenness, disorderly con-
duct, vagrancy, and all other offenses com-
Part 2 bined. The files both have logical record
Incident lengths of 80. Class IV
rectangular file structure
155,267 cases
149 variables
2SS-unlt-long record
1 record per case Gurr, Ted Robert and Erika Gurr
Crime In western SOCieties, 1945-1974
Part 3
Offender (ICPSR 7769)
rectangular file structure
175,840 cases These data were collected from national sta-
69 variables tistical sources for 16 western societies plus
148-unit-long record Israel and Japan. Data on population and
1 record per case eight categories of crime were gathered for
as many years as possible between 1945
Part 4 and 1974. Both <;tmvictlons and offenses
Victim known 10 police ware recorded whenever pos-
rectangular file structure sible. There are approximately 67 variables
161,587 cases for each case Including percent yearly
113 variables change and population-weighted measures of
223-unit-long record the Incidence of each offense. Class II
1 record per case
Related Publications:
Gurr, Ted Robert
·Crime trends In modern democracies
since 1945." Intflrnational Annals of Criml-
Greenberg, David F. nology16 (1977),41·86.
Age cohort arrest rates, 1970-1980 Gurr, Ted Robert
·On the history of violent crimes in Europe
(ICPSR 8261) and America" In Hugh Davis Graham and
Ted Robert Gurr (eds.), Violence in Amer-
Tlis study wa'~ sponsored by the United States ica. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications,
Depcrtnent of Justice, National Institute of Jus- 1979.
tice. The gra1t number is 82-IJ-CX-0025.

158 National Arichive of Criminal Justice Data


HeJUman, Daryl A. and Jam'3s Alan Fox term. sex. age, and race of the allegad defen-
dant. There are six files in the data collection
Census of urban crime, 1970 and the logical record length of each fils Is BO
(ICPSR 8275) characters. Two of the files are SPSS control
cards that are associated with two of the data
files. One fila has a printed codebook, a-~
Tlis study was sponsored by the United States the final file contains SPSS control card~ ("'-
Departmant of Justice, Na1ionallnst~ute of Jus- lowed by data. Class IV
tice. The grC¥'lt number Is 81-IJ·CX·OOO3.

Summary: This dataset contains Information


on United States cities with 1970 populations
over 150,000. ThEira are 331 variables includ- Lizotte, Alan J.
ing crime Incidence, criminal sanctions, police
employment, police expenditures, pottce un- Crime on campus, 1978-1979:
Ionization, city revenues and sources uf reve- A survey of 150 college campuses
nue (including intergovernmental transfers), and citIes
property values, public sector package char-
acteristics, demographic and socioeconomic (ICPSR 8381)
characlerlstics, and housing and land use
characteristics. Data for 88 cities were col- These data contain information about crime
lected, The data were primarily gathered from on 150 selected college campuses and cities
various governmental censuses: Census of In the United States. This collection contains
Population, Census of Housing, Census of Information on violent crime on campus. prop-
Government, Census of Manufactures, and erty crime on campus, the number of police
Census of Business. The Uniform crime reo officers assigned to campus duty, aggregate
ports (ICPSR 9028) and Expenditure and demographics and socio-economlc conditions
employment data for the criminal justice of the students on campus as well as for the
system (ICPSR 7818) were used as supple- cities in the dataset. Three files comprise this
mental sources. There are 43 records per collection. One Is an SPSS Version 9111e con-
case each with a logical record length of 80. taining control cards; and a second has SP-
Class IV SSx control cards. A third file contains the
data The logical record length of the data Is
80 characters. There are approximately 80
variables. Class IV
Hawnt, John
Social order In Middletown, 1932-1975
National Center for Heatth Statistics
(ICPSR 9058)
Mortality detail flies, 1968-1978
Muncla, Indiana which has more commonly [Volume I], 1979-1980 [Volume II],
been referred to as "Middletown" in social sci- 1981-1982 [Volume III], 1983-1984
ence (,fudies, Is the location for this data col-
lection. The purpose of this study was to ex- [Volume IV), 1985 [Volume V], and
amine crime over a period of 43 years. The 1986..1987 [Volume VI]
data were collected from official records of (lCPSR 7632)
the criminal courts in Muncie and Delaware
County, Indiana. The unit of analysis is the The Mortality detail files, which document all
criminal act charged. All charges were deaths In the United States, are presented In
counted and appropriately categorized. The five groupings: data for 1968-1978, data for
following rules were observed for cases In- 1979-1980, data for 1981-1982, 1983-1984,
volving multiple charges or muitiple counts of and 1985, The 1968·1978 Mortality detail files
single charges. Flrst, each charge was contain information on all deaths registered
counted separately when multiple charge:> on individual death certificates in the United
were filed. Second, when a defendant was States from 1968 Ulrough 1978. Detailed geo-
charged with multiple counts of a single graphic and personal items as well as data on
charge, each count was considered 10 ba a the cause of death are Included. Personal in-
separate act and so recorded. Variables in formation includes the month and day of
this dataset Include year of criminal oct death, the sex of the deceased, the detailed
charge, first, second, and third offenses age of the deceased at the time of death. the
charged, amount of bail, length of prison decedent's place of residence and place of

Official statistics 159


death, and whether or not an autopsy was Part 6
performed. Cause of death information is re- 1972
corded using codes from the International rectangular file structure
Classification of Diseases (9th Revision). The 983,001 cases
1968-1978 datasets each have a total of 35 35 variables
variables. Each year has a logical record SO-unit-long record
length of 80 characters. The 1979-1980 data 1 record per case
files contaln Information on all deaths regis-
tered on Individual death certificates In the Part 7
United States for the years 1979-1980 and 1973
transmitted to the National Center for Health rectangular file structure
Statistics (NCHS). this volume differs from 1,975,126 cases
Volume I of the Mortality detail flies, 1968- 35 variables
1978 because of changes In Cause of Death 80-unit-long record
Definitions Incorporated In the Ninth Revision 1 record per case
of the International Classification of Diseases
(ICD-9). Because of these changes, code- Part 8
books and data are not directly comparable 1974
between volumes, although attempts were rectangular file structure
made to standardize coding whenever possi- 1,936,476 cases
ble. In addition to differences In cause of 35 variables
death codes, the 1979 and 1980 data Include SO-unit-long I'ecord
several variables not avallable for the 1968- 1 record per case
1978 period. They are: (1) mortality by marital
status, (2) state or country of birth, and (3) Part 9
place of death and status of decedent when 1975
death occurred In a hospital or medical cen- rectangular file structure
ter. Therefore, there are 38 variables In the 1,S95, 135 cases
1979 and 1980 datasets each with a logical 35 variables
record length of 86 characters. With these ex- SO-unit-long record
ceptions, the data are similar In structure and 1 record per case
content to the 1968-1978 data For the 1980
dataset, NCHS revised its SMSA codes using Part 10
the 1980 Census SMSfo. codes. A list of these 1976
revised SMSA codes Is appended to the code- rectangular filE. ,:\Jcture
book. For most years Included in this dataset, 1,911,907 cases
there are close to two million records. For ex- 35 variables
ample, there are 1,930,082 records In the SO-unit-long record
1968 dataset and 1,993,137 records In the 1 record per case
1980 dataset. A few years, 1972, 1973, 1974,
and 1975, only contain approximately Part 11
160,000 records. 1977
rectangular file structure
Note: A special subset of data, the Mortality 1,902,106 cases
detail file: External cause extract, 1968- 35 variables
1978,1979-1980 (ICPSR 8224) was made SO-unit-Iong record
by ICPSR through the Criminal Justice Ar- 1 record per case
chive. This dataset includes all registered
deaths that were caused by events other than Part 12
disease including accidents, war, natural 1978
events, and homicide. The reason-for-death rectangular file structure
codes and the number of variables in Volume I 1,930,627 cases
are different from those in Volume II. Volumes I 35 variables
and II, 1008-1980, are Class I. VolUmes III, IV, SO-unit-Iong record
V, ~d VI, 1981-19S7, are Class IV. 1 record per case

Extent of collection: 20 data files + machine-


readable documentation

OSIRIS and card Image data formats for the


years 1965- i 9S0, logical record length for the
years 1981-19S7

160 National Arichive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 13 Part 20
1969 1982
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
1,921,990 cases 1,977,957 cases
35 variables 59 variables
80-unlt-long record 159-unlt-long (ecord
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 14 Part 21
1970 1983
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
1,922,966 cases 2,022,190 cases
35 variables 59 variables
aO-unit·long record 159-unit·long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 15 Part 22
1971 1984
rectangular file sb'Ucture rectangular file structure
1,929,476 cases 2,942,304 cases
35 variables 59 variables
80·unlt-long record 159-unlt·long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 16 Part 23
19G8 1985
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
1,930,082 cases 2,089,378 cases
35 variables 53 variables
80-unit-Iong record 159·unit·long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 17 Part 24
1980 1986
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
1,993,137 cases 2,108,384 cases
38 variables 67 variables
86-unit-!ong record 159-unit·long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 18 Part 25
1979 1987
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
1,916,776 cases 2,126,342 cases
38 variables 67 variables
86·unit-long record 159.unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 19
1981
rectangular file structure
1,981,309 cases National Center for Heakh Statistics
59 variables Mortality detail file: External cause
159-unit-long record extract, 1968-1978, 1979·1980
1 record per case
(ICPSR 8224)

The Mortality Detail File: External Cause Ex-


tract is a special subset of data prepared from
the Mortality Detail Fife 1968-1980 (lCPSR
7632). These data were collected by the Na-
tional Center for Health Statistics and are of

Official statistics 161


considerable Importance to those Individuals Center for Applied Social Research, North-
Interested In criminological research. The eastern University, Boston, Massachusetts un-
Cause of Death codes for the 1968-1978 der several grants from the National Institute
data are derived from the Eighth Revision of of Justice In order to produce easily accessi-
the International Classification of Diseases ble and highly reliable time series data on offi-
Adapted for Use In the United States (ICDA- cially reported crime. Originally provided by
8), The Cause of Death codes for the 1979- the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
1980 data ara derived from the Ninth Revi- these data exclude Uniform Crime Report
sion, International Classification of Diseases (UCR) data from Infrequently reporting law en-
(ICD-9). Due to changes In Cause of Death forcement agencies. In general, only those
definitions Incorporated In the Ninth Revision, agencies which submitted ten or more
the 1968-1978 data and codebooks differ monthly reports in every year during 1967
slightly from the 1979-1980 data files. For ex- through 1980 are included In this dataset.
ample, the 1979-1980 external cause defini- The data Include detailed breakdowns of of-
tions Include new codes fOf handgun versus fenses and clearances taken from dlsaggre-
other gun accidents, handgun versus other gated UCR Return A tapes. Of particular Inter-
gun SUicides, handgun versus other gun homi- est are weapon-specific robbery and assault
cides, and drug poison versus other polson variables; types of rape, burglary, larceny,
homicides. In addition to the differences in the and motor vehicle theft; and clearances by ar-
Cause of Death codes and recodes, the 1979- rest (or other exceptional means) of adults
1980 data Include three variables not avail- and jwenlles for each offense sub-type. Both
able In the 1968-1978 datasets. These are: monthly and annual counts of these are avail-
(1) mortality by marital status, (2) state or able. Finally, as an aid to the user, each
country of birth, and (3) place of death and agency is Identified by its FBI ·ORI Code" as
status of decedent when death occurred In a well as a sequential case number produced
hospital or medical center. With these excep- and documented by ICPSR In the codebook's
tions, the data are similar In structure and con- appendix. Cases also may be Identified by
tent to the 1968-1978 data providing such de- geographic region, state, SMSA, county,
tailed personal and geographic Information as population size and group, and frequency of
month and day of death, deceased's race and reporting. The time series data are stored In
gender, age of deceased at time of death, 14 separate files of annually pooled cross-
place of decedent's residence (specific to the sections. Each file contains approximately
city level) and place of death (specific to the 1,279 variables for 3,328 cases where each
county level), and whether an autopsy was case represents a consistently reporting law
performed. For each data file for the years enforcement agency. The data are available
1968 through 1978, there are 35 variables for In OSIRIS and card Image formats. Class II
approximately 82,846 to 166,997 records,
each with a logical record length of 80 charac-
ters. For the years 1979 and 1980, there are
38 variables for 159,635 and 161,374 re-
Pierce, Glenn L. and James Alan Fox
cords, respectively. The 1979 and 1980 data
have a logical record length of 86 characters. Uniform crime reports: Offenses
Class I known and clearances by arrest time
series data, 1965-1983
(lCPSR 8631)
Pierce, Glenn L., William J. Bowers,
James Baird, and Joseph Heck Summary: The Uniform Crime Reporting
(UCR) Program Data Is a system designed to
Uniform crime reports: National time monitor the incidence of crime and the activi-
series community-level database, ties of law enforcement agencies at the com-
1967,,1P80 munity leVel. Participating local law enforce-
ment agencies throughout the nation report
(ICPSR 8214) regularly (usually on a monthly basis) on the
volume of selected crimes and arrests and
The Uniform Crime Reports National Time Se- also on the levels of police personnel and
ries Data, 1967-1980 include detailed criminal types of police activities. This collection con-
offense and clearance information submitted sists of time series data relating to offenses
monthly by over 3,000 consistently reporting known and clearances by arrest for the years
law enforcement agencies in the United 1965-1983,1970-1983, and 1975-1983. Only
States. These data were processed at the those agencies that consistently reported
over the three time periods of the study were

162 National Arichive of Criminal Justice Data


Included. Consistently reporting agencies data and to analyze trends over the period
were defined as those agencies that were In 1968-1978. The unit of analysis Is the homi-
operation during the time of the study and cide Victim, and vorlables Include Information
submitted nine or more monthly reports dur- on the reporting agency, the circumstances of
Ing the calendar year for the three specified the Incident, and the characteristics of the vic-
time periods. Variables Include number of ac- tim and the offender. Within these categories
tual offenses reported to the police, the total are variables pertaining to population and city
number of offenses for each category cleared size, victim's £ind offender's age, race, and
by arrest, and the number of clearances by ar- sex as well as the number of victims and of-
rest involving only persons und er 18 years of fenders involved In the incident. Information
age. Crimes covered are criminal homicide, about the Incident Includes the type of
forcible rape, robbery, assault, burglary, lar- weapon used and the circumstances sur-
ceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft. Class IV rounding the Incident. Class IV
Universe: All law enforcement agencies In the Universe: Homicide victims In the United
United States from 1965 to 1983. States.
Note: These data are organized In rectangu- Note: The data have been reformatted be-
lar format with variable length records. The cause of the dlfflculty In using FBI data as
longest LRECL Is 5,676 characters. they are released. The reformatting has re-
sulted In the unit of observation (homicide vic-
Extent of collection: 42 data flies tim) being constant across the study
period. The storage mode Is ·character-
logical record length data format numeric". Two major changes In FBI coding
of the Supplementary Homicide Reports have
Parts 1-19 resulted In relatively consistent coding within
Years 1965-1983 the time periods 1968-1972, 1973-Hl75, and
rectangular file structure 1976-1978, but not between them.
3,395 cases
approx. 1,100 variables Extent of collection: 11 data files
1 record per case
Logical record length data format
Parts 20-33
Years 1970-1983 Part 1
rectangular file structure 1968
4,454 cases rectangular file structure
approx. 1,100 variables 11,957 cases
1 record per case 37 variables
132-unit-lcng record
Parts 34-42 1 record per case
Years 1975-1983
rectangular file structure Part 2
8,149 cases 1969
approx. 1,100 variables rectangular file structure
1 record per case 12,918 cases
37 variables
132-unit-long record
1 record per case
Riedel, Marc and Margaret A. Zahn Part 3
Trends In American homicide, 1970
1968-19713: Victim-level supplementary rectangular file structure
13,039 cases
homIcide reports 37 variables
(ICPSR 8676) 132-unlt-long record
1 record per case
This study was sponsored by the United States
Depa'tment of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grmt number is 79-NI-AX-0092.

Summary: This stUdy was carried out in order


to standardize the format of national homicide

Official statistics 163


Part 4 Part 11
1971 1976
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
15,323 cases 18,941 cases
37 variables 37 variables
132-unit-long record 132-unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 5
1972
rectangular file structure
15,832 cases Vandaele, Watter
37 variables Participation In illegitimate activities:
132-unlt-long record Ehrlich revisited, 1960
1 record per case
(ICPSR 8677)
Part 6
1973 ThIs study was sponsored by the UnltOO States
rectangular file structure Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
17,124 cases tice. The grant number Is J-LEAA-006-76.
37 variables
132-unlt-long r~crd Summary: This study re-analyzes Isaac Ehr-
1 record per case lich's 1960 cross-section data on the relation-
ship between aggregate levels of punishment
Part 7 and crime rates. It provides alternative model
1974 specifications and estimations. The study ex-
rectangular file structure amined the deterrent effects of punishment
18,632 cases on seven FBI Index crimes: murder, rape, as-
37 variables sault, larceny, robbery, burglary, and auto
132-unit-long record theft. Socioeconomic variables Include family
1 record per case income, percentage of families earning below
half of the median Income, unemployment
Part 8 rate for urban males In the age groups 14-24
1975 and 35-39, labor force participation rate, edu-
rectangular file structure cational level, percentage of young males
18,642 cases and non-whites In the population, percentage
37 variables of population In the SMSA, sex ratio, and
132-unlt-long record place of occurrence. Two sanction variables
1 record per case are also Included: 1) the probability of Impris-
onment, and 2) the average time served in
Part 9 prison when sentenced (severity of punish-
1976 ment). Also Included are: per capita police ex-
rectangular file structure penditure for 1959 and 1960, and the crime
16,821 cases rates for murder, rape, assault, larceny, rob-
37 variables bery, burglary, and auto theft. Class IV
132-unit-long record
1 record per case Extent of collection: 1 data file
Part 10 logical record length data format
19n
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
18,300 cases 47 cases
37 variables 66 variables
132-unit-long record 501-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Related Publications:
Ehrlich, I.
"PartiCipation In Illegitimate activities: A
theoretical and empirical investigation."
Journal of Political Economy (May-June
1973),521-565.

164 National Arichive of Criminal Justice Data


Ehrlich. I. Related PUblications:
·Partlclpatlon In illegitimate activities: An Wolfgar.g. Marvin E., et al.
economic analysis." In essays In the eco· "The national crime survey Index of crime
nomlcs of crime and punishment. 1974, severlty.~Washlngton, D.C.: U.S. Govern-
69·134. ment Printing Office, 1985.
Vandaele. W. Wolfgang. Marvin E., et aI.
"Partlclpatlon In illegitimate activities: Ehrlich "The sourcebook of crime severity ratios
revisited." In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, BOO D. for core-Item offenses." Washington. D,C.:
Nagln (ads.), Deterrence and IncapacitE;· U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985.
tion: Estimating the effects of criminal sanc·
tions on crime rat9S. Washington, D.C.: N~·
tiona! Academy of Sciences, 1978,
Zahn, Margaret A. and Marc Riedel
Nature and patterns of homicide
WoKgang, Marvin E., Robert M. Flgllo, In eight American cities, 1978
Paul E. Tracy, and Simon I. Singer (ICPSR 8936)
National crime surveys: Index of crime
Thls study was sponsored by the United States
severity. 1977
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
(lCPSR 8295) tice. The grant number Is 79-NI-AX-0092.

Summary: The purpose of this data collection Summary: This data set contains detailed In-
was to determine the seriousness of criminal formation on homicides in eight United States
events. The principal Investigators sought to cities: Philadelphia, Newark, Chicago, St.
determine and rate the relative seriousness of Louis, Memphis, Dallas, Oakland, and "Ash-
murder, rape, and petty theft, Information In ton" (a representative large western city). De-
the collection Includes respondents' opinions taJled characteristics for each homicide, age,
on the severity of particular crimes as well as gender, race, place of birth, marital status, liv·
how that severity compared to other crimes. Ing arrangements, occupation, socioeco-
Class IV nomic status (SES), employment status,
method of assault, location where homicide
Universe: All households In the United States. occurred, relationship 01 victim to olfender, cir-
cumstances surrounding death, precipitation
Sampling: A stratified random sample of or resistance of victim, physical evidence col-
households In the United States. lected, victim's drug history, victim's prior
criminal record, and number of offenders iden-
Note: This data collection was conducted as tified. Data on up to two offenders and three
a supplement to the National Crime Survey: witnesses are also available including the
National Sample over a six-month period be· criminal history, justice system disposition,
ginning In July. 1977. and age, sex, and race 01 each olfender. Infor-
mation on the age, sex, and race of each
Extent of collection: 2 data files witness also was collected as were data on
witness type (police informant, child, eyewit-
Logical record length data format ness, etc.). Finally, Information from the medi-
cal examiner's records including results of
Part 1 narcotics and blood alcohol tests of the victim
1977 collection quarter 3 are provided. Class IV
rectangular file strUcture
30,000 cases Universe: Cases in the United States defined
204 variables by each city's police department and medical
1OS-unlt-Iong record examiner as homicide.
8 records per case
Sampling: A purposive sample of eight cities
Part 2 was selected based on geographic region,
1977 collectioi1 quarter 4 population size, and whether their eleven-
rectangular file structure year homiclde trend Hne followed or diverged
30,000 cases from respective regional trend lines. Dallas,
204 variables St. LOUis, and VAshton" diverged from re-
1OS-unit-Iong record gional patterns, while the other cities In the
8 records per case sample-Philadelphia, Newark, Chicago,

Official statistics 165


Memphis, and Oakland-followed them. Universe: Robberies reported to and re-
Within each city, all homicide cases were corded by the Chicago Pollee Department.
coded, except In Chicago, where a 50 per-
cent systematic random sample of homicide Sampling: For the sample of robberies reSUlt-
cases was drawn. Ing In victim Injury, the sample was con-
structed from a screening and referral of the
Extent of collactlon: 1 data file + SPSS con- first 30 reports of robbery to the Detective DI-
trol cards vision each month where a notation was pre-
sent that hospital assistance was required for
logical record length data format with SPSS thev!ctim.
control cards
Note: This dataset Is a machine-readable text
rectangular file structure file. Records per case va;les depending on
1,748 cases the length of the narratives. In Part 1 there
214 variables are from 3 to 70 SO-character records per
82-unlt-long record case. In Parts 2 and 3 the number of records
1 record per case per case ranges from 2 to 70.

Related Publication: Extent of collection: 3 data flies


Riedel, M., M. Zahn, and L.F. Mock
"The nature and patterns of American Logical record length data format
homicide." Washington, D.C.: National In-
stitute of Justice. Part 1
Robberies with homicides
rectangular file structure
95 cases
2 variables
Zimring, Franklin E. and James Zeuhl 80-unit-long record
Robbtlrles In Chicago, 1982-1983
Part 2
(lCPSR 8951) Homicides with no apparent motive
rectangular file structure
Summary: These data examine the factors 142 cases
that cause victim Injury and death In robber- 2 variables
Ies. The study Inve!>tigated the relationship of 80-unlt-long record
victim and offender, place of event, relation-
ship to drugs, weapon used, sex of victim, re- Part 3
sistance to assallant, Incidence of Injury Robberies with Injury
and/or death, and the clearance patterns of rectangular file structure
the offense. The researchers constructed nar- 346 cases
ratives of criminal events from police records 2 variables
and, In the cases of death, from interviews 80-unlt-long record
with police conducted while an Investigation
was still in progress or shortly after it con- Related Publication:
cluded. The data consist of the actual narra- Zimrlng, Franklin E., and James Zeuhl
tive accounts. Class IV "Victim Injury and death In urban robbery:
A Chicago study." Journal of Legal Studies
15 (January 1986), 1-40.

166 National Arichive of Criminal Justice Data


Police

Bureau of Justice Statistics, sheriffs' department, levels of employment


U.S. Department of Justice and spending, various functions of the depart-
ment, average salary levels for uniformed offi-
Directory of law enforcement cers, and other matters relating to manage-
agencies, 1986: [United States] ment and personnel. Class II
(ICPSR 8696) Universe: All United States state law enforce-
men! agencies and city and township law en-
Summary: This dataset Was collected by the forcement agencies.
Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Jus-
tice Statistics. It Is a list of law enforcement Sampling: State law enforcement agencies
agencies and contains variables regarding and city and township law enforcement agen-
employment categories such as total full-time, cies with 135 or more sworn employees were
part-time, sworn-In and other employees. It selected. County police, as distinguished
also contalns FIPS codes and populations. from sheriffs' departments, were combined
Class IV with municipal and township law enforcement
agencies In the category of local police agen-
Universe: Law enforcement agencies In the cies. The remaining agencies were selected
United States. In a two-stage process. The first stage units
were counties, the same as those selected
Extent of collection: 1 data file for the Survey of inmates of local jails,
1983 [United States] (lCPSR 8274). For that
logical record length data format survey, all counties In the United States were
divided Into five strata based on the average
rectangular file structure daily Inmate population of the Jails In the
16,708 cases county. The first stratum Included all counties
20 variables contalning Jalls with average daily populations
148-unlt-long record of 100 Inmates or more. lnese counties were
1 record per case included with certainty. The other four strata,
with decreasing average Jail populations,
were sampled at varying Intervals. A sixth stra-
tum was added for the LEMAS survey to rep-
Bureau of Justice Statistics, resent those states with combined Jail/prison
U.S. Department of Justice systems that were not Included In the 1983
Survey of inmates of local jails. All counties
Law enforcement management and In these states were Included with certainty.
administrative statistics (LEMAS), 1987 All county-level law enforcement agencies In
the counties selected for the sample were in-
(ICPSR 9222) cluded In the survey. The second stage units
were municipal and township law enforce-
Summary: This survey, the first In the Bureau ment agencies. A sample of these agencies
of Justice Statistics' new program on law En- was selected from within the six strata based
forr-ement Management and Administrative on the number of sworn employees In the
Statistics (LEMAS), presents information on agency. In all, 3,054 law enforcement agen-
three types of general purpose law enfo/ce- cies were included in the sample. The final
ment agencies: state police, local police, and weight assigned to each case was the In-
sheriffs' departments. Data from the primary verse of its probability of selection.
state police agency in each of 49 states (Ha-
wali does not have a state police agency) are Note: The LEMAS survey will be repeated In
also presented. Variables include size of the 1990 and every three years thereafter. The
populations served by the typical police or number of sheriffs' agoncies In this repoit
may not correspond exactly to the totals

Police 167
found In other publications. Also, the total for the traffic stops Include manner of Investl·
number of agencies Is the result of the gatlon, Incident coda, officers' description of
weighted sample and not an exact count of all the incident, condition of the vehicle stopped,
agencies nationwide. During the course of police contact with the passengers of the vehi-
data collection, the sampling frame was found cle, demeanor of passengers to the pollee, de-
to be deflclmt In Texas because a number of meanor of police to the passengers, resolu-
constable offices had not been Included. A tion of the situation, and others. The data
systematic sample of one-fourth of these of- were collected based on field observation, us-
fices was added to the survey. ing an in strum ant tor recording observations.
The data were sampled based on a stratified
Extent of collection: 1 data fila + machine- sample by precinct and shift. The logical record
readable documentation + SPSS control length of each file Is BO. Class IV
cards
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with
SPSS cootrol cards for each
Berk, Richard A. and Lawrence W.
rectangular file structure Sherman
2,907 cases Specific deterrent effects of arrest for
508 variables
1,434-unlt-long record domestic assault: Minneapolis,
21 records per case 1981~1982

(ICPSR 8250)
Related Publication:
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice
Programs This study was sponsored by the United States
'Profiles of state and local law enforce- Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
ment agencies, 1987." Bureau of Justice tice. The grant number Is BO-IJ·CX-0042.
Statistics Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S.
Summary: This data collection contalns data
Government Printing Office, n.d.
on 330 domestio Violent events. The data
were collected between March 1981 and Sep-
tember 1982. There are several parts to this
collection. The first deals with Information
Bayley, David about domestic assault incidents taken from
the persons involved in such incidents. Inter-
Effectiveness of police response: views were conducted with all parties to the
Denver, 1982 domestic assault. Included here are such
(ICPSR 8217) items as socioeconomic and demographic at-
tributes of the suspect and victim, their rela-
tionship (husband, wife, boyfriend, girlfriend,
This study was sponsored by the United States lover, divorced, separated), the nature of the
Department of Justice, National lnsmute of Jus- argument that spurred the assault, the pres-
tice. The grant number is 81-IJ·CX-0082. ence or absence of physical violence, and the
nature and extent of police contact in the Inci-
Summary: The nature of police behavior in dent. In addition to data on the individuals in-
problematic situations encountered by patrol volved In the disputes, police arrest records
personnel, primarily disturbances and traffic were also documented. The date of the
stops, Is Investigated In thIs data collection. crime, the ethnlcity of the participants, the
The site for the data collection was Denva', presence or absence of alcohol or drugs, a
Colorado; information was gathered In the pe- weapon, and a police assault In the incident
riod from June to September, 1982. The da- were also recorded. This data collection has
taset contains two files. The first Is for distur- nine files and there are over 100 variables.
bance encounters, and contains data for 92 Class IV
cases and 404 variables. The second liIe Is
for trafflc stops; it has 164 cases, and 210
variables. The variables for disturbances in-
clude type of disturbance, manner of investi-
gation, designation of police response, sev-
eral situational variables such as type of
setting, number of victims, bYf:tanders, sus-
pects, and witnesses, demeanor of police to-
ward participants, and others. The variables

168 National Archive of Criminal 'Justice Data


Bowers, William J., Jon Hirsch, Jack Part 2
McDevttt, ~nd Glenn L Pierce Police activity reports data file 1
rectangular llIe structure
Effects of foot patrol policing In 1.8,450 cases
80ston, 1977-1985 10 variables
aD-unit-long record
(ICPSR 9351) 1 record per case
Tlis study was sponsored by the United States PartS
Depa1ment of Justice, NatlC!lal Institute of Jus- Police activity reports data file 2
1ice. The grant number Is 84-IJ-CX-K035. rectangular file structure
7,760 cases
Summary: This collection eValuates the Im- 10 variables
pact of a new foot patrol plan. Implemented 80-unlt-long record
by the Boston Pollca Department, on Inci- 1 record per case
dents of crime and neighborhood distur-
bances. Part ; contalns Information on serv- Part 4
Ice calls catagorlzed by types of criminal Police activity reports data file 3
offenses such as murder, rape, aggravated rectangular file structure
assault/ simple assault, robbery, larceny, bur- 8/178 cases
glary, and auto theft. It also contains data 071 10 variables
types of community disturbances such as a 80-unlt-long record
noisy party. gang. 01' mil'l'Jr disturbance and 1 record per case
response priority of the Incidents. Response
priorities arE! classified according to a four- Related Publlcatlon:
levfilf scale: Priority 1: emergency calls Includ- Bowers, W.J., and J.H. Hirsch
Ing crimes in progress. high risk or personal "The Impact of foot patrol staffing on crime
injury. and medical emergencies, Priority 2: and disorder in Boston: American Journal
calls of intermediate urgency, Priority 3: calls of Police 6 (1987).17-44.
not requiring Immediate response, Priority 4:
calls of undetermined priority. Parts 2 and 3 in-
clude Information about patrol 'time used In
eelCh of the three dally shifts during the pre-
and post·lntervention periods. Part 4 presents Dunford,. Franklyn W., David HUizinga,
information similar to Parts 2 and 3 but the and Delbert Elliott
data span a longer period of tlme-approxl- Domestic vIolence experience In
mately seven years. Class IV
Omaha, Nebraska, 1986-1987
Universe: All 911 calls received by the Boston (ICPSR 9481)
Police Department from 1977 through 1985.
Summary: The purpose of this data collection
Sampling: Sampling consists of all calls for was to corroborate the Minneapolis Domestic
service and police activity data recorded in Violence Experiment (1984) finding that ar·
the Boston Police Department's computer- rest Is an effective deterrent against contin-
alded dispatch (CAD) system for rela~vely ued domestic assaults. The data addressed
small geographical reporting areas In the city the following questions: (1) To what extent
of Boston. does arrest decrease the likelihood of contin-
ued Violence. as assessed by the victim? (2)
Extent of collection: 4 data files To what extent does arrast decrease the likeli-
hood of continued complalnts of crime, as as-
Logical record length data format sessed by pollee records? (3) What are the
differences in arrest recldlvlam between
Part 1 cases that Involved arrest versus cases that
Monthly calls for service data Involved mediation, separation, warrant, or no
rectangular file structure warrant? Based on three data sources, do-
83.284 cases mestic violence cases in the three sectors of
25 variables Omaha, Nebraska were assigned to one of fr...e
140-unit.\ong record experimental treatments: mediation, separa- •
1 record per case lion. arrest, warrant, or no warrant. Data for VIC-
tim reports werfil collected from three interviews
of the victims corKiucted one week, six months,
ana 12 monUls after the domestic violence incl-
Police 169
dent. The Investigators used arrest recIdI- Part 5
vism, continued complaints of crime, and vic- Six-month pollco record saarch data file
tim reports or repealed violence (fear of Injury, 1,154 cases
pushing-hitting, and physical Injury) as out- 1,034 variables
come measures to assess the extent to which 80-unlt-long record
treatments prevented subsequent conflicts. 22 records per case
Other variables Include self-esteem, locUS of
control, welfare dependency, changes In the PartS
relationships between suspect and victim, Twelve-month police record search data
charactorlstics of pollce action taken, extent file
of the victim's Inlury, and extent of drug use rectangular file structure
by the victim and suspect. The following 1,154 cases
demographic variables are Included In the 1,034 variables
data: race, age, sex, Income, occupational 80-unlt-long record
status, and marital status. Class IV 22 records par case

Universe: Domestic violence cases In Related Publication:


Omaha, Nebraska. Dunford, F.W., D. HUizinga, and D.S. Elliott
"The Omaha domestic violence police ex-
Sampling: Two-stage random sampllng de- periment" (final report to the National Insti-
sign. tute of Justice). Boulder, CO: University of
Colorado at Boulder, Institute of Bel,av-
Note: By design, the sample was confined to loral Science, 1989.
misdemeanor domestic violence Incidents. Dunford, F.W., D. Huizinga, and D.S. Elliott
Conclusions cannot be generalized to more "The Omaha domestic violence experi-
serious forms of assault. ment. " Criminology 28 (1990), 183-206.
Extent of collection: 6 data files
Card Image data format
Edelhertz, Herbert, and Thomas D.
Part 1 Overcast
Ons-week data file Organized crime business actlvltle$
rectangular file structure
577 cases and their Implications for law
506 variables enforcement, 1986·1987
80-unlt-long record (ICPSR 9476)
10 records per case
This study was sponsored by the United States
Part 2 Department of Justice, National Inst~ute of Jus-
Six-mon~h data file tice. The grant number Is 87-IJ-CX-0053.
rectangular file structure
577 cases Summary: This project was undertaken to In-
690 variables vestigate organized criminal groups and the
80-unlt-long record types of business activities In which they en-
13 records per case gage. The fccus (unit of analysis) was on the
organized groups rather than their Individual
Part 3 members. The project assessed the needs of
Twelve-month data liIe
rectangular file structurE! these groups In pursuing their goals and con-
sidered the operations used to implement or
577 cases carry out their activities. The data collected
704 variables address some of the following Issues: (1) Are
80-unlt-long record business operations Onciuding dally opera-
13 records per ~e tions, acquiring ownership, and structuring
the organization) of organized criminal groups
Part 4 conducted In a manner paralleling legitimate
Police report data file
business ventures? (2) Should Investigating
rectangular file structure and prosecuting white-collar crime be a cen-
577 cases tral way of proceeding against organized
45 variables criminal groups? (3) What are the charac-
80-unlt-long record teristics of the Illegal activities of organized
1 record per case

170 National Atcllive of Criminal Justice Data


criminal groups? (4) In what ways are legal tute of Justice. The grant numbers are 73-NI·
activities used by organized criminal groups 99-0047 and 77-NI-GG-0016.
to pursue Income from Illegal activities? (5)
What Is the purpose of Inv.oIvement In legal Summar~: This Is a study of the relationship
activities for organized criminal groups? (6) between the amount of time taken by police
What sel'Vices are used by organized criminal to respond to calls for service and the out-
groups to Implement their activities? Variables comes of the criminal and noncriminal Inci-
include Information on the offen!Se actually dents. Outcomes were evaluated In terms of
charged against the criminal organization In police effectiveness and citizen satisfaction.
the ir)dictments or complalnts, other illegal ac- The data were collected between March and
tivities participated in by the organization, and December of 1975 in Kansas City, Missouri.
the Judgments against the orga."lization re- Respo.',se time data were generated by tim-
quested by law enforcement agencies. Thel.le Ing telephone and radio exchanges on police
Judgmenta fall Into several categorleo: mone- dispatch tapes. Police travel time was meas-
tary relief (such as payment of costs of investi- ured and recorded by highly trained civilian
gation and recovery 01 stolen or misappropri- observers. To assess satisfaction with police
ated funds), equitable relief (such as placing service, personal and telephone interviews
the business In receivership or establishment were conducted with victims and witnesses
of a victim fund), restralnts on actions (such who had made the calls to the police. Sllrty·
as prohibiting participation in labor union ac- nine police beats within the three patrol divi-
tivities or further crin'linallnvolvement), and sions of Kansas City, Missouri, were select,ad
forfeitures (such as forfeiting assets in pen- on the basis of thuff high rate of robbery and
sion funds or bank accounts). Other variables aggra'll'lted assaults. These police beats
Include the organization's participation In busi- seemed likely to produce a higher proportion
ness-type activities-both Illegal and legal, of the types of calls desired for the analysis.
the organization's purpose for providing legal The data are stored In card-Image form In 23
goods and services, the objectives of the or- files, with SPSS control cards available for
ganization, the market for the illegal goods each file. Class IV
and services provided by the organization,
the organization's assets, the business serv-
Ices it requires. how it financially provides for
Its members, the methods It uses to acquire Klein, Malcolm W., Cheryl L. Maxson, and
ownership. Indicators of Its ownership, and
the nature of its victims. Class IV Margaret A Gordon
Pollee response to street gang
Universe: Organized criminal groups within
the United States. violence In California: Improving the
Investigative process, 1985
Sampling: Purposeful (rather than random) (ICPSR 8934)
sampling.
This study was sponsored by \he United States
Extent of collection: 1 data file
Department of Justice. National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number is 84-IJ·CX-0052.
Card Image data format
Summary: This data collection examines
rectangular file structure
gang and non-gang homicides as well as
167 cases
371 variables other types of offenses in small CaliforniaJu-
risdictlons. Data are provided on violent gang
80-unlt-long record
offenses and offenders as well as on a com-
10 records per case panion sample of non-gang offenses and of-
fenses and offenders. Two separate data files
are avallable, one for participants and one for
Incidents. The participant data Include age,
Kansas City, Missouri, Policf.:! Department gender, race, and role of participants. The Inci-
dent data Include information from the "violent
Police response 11me analysis, 1975 incident data collection form" (setting, auto in-
(lCPSR 7760) volvement, and amount of property loss). and
the "group Indicators coding form" (argot, tat-
This study was sponsored by the United toos, clothing, and slang terminology). Class IV
States Department of Justice, Natlonallnsti-

Police 171
Universe: Homicides and violent crimes in charge reductions or dismissals due to evi·
five small California jurisdictions. dentiary problems. The data were designed
to permit an assessment of the effectiveness
Sampling: Separate gang-designated and of two experimental police evidence collection
non·gang·designated samples were selected programs Implemented on April 1, 1985. One
from cases that included at least one named of these was an Investigative and post·arrest
or described suspoct between the ages of 10 procedural guide. The other was an Individual·
and 30. ized feedback report prepared by prosecutors
for police officers. The officer file Includes In·
Extent of collection: 2 data flies formation on each officer's sex and race,
length of police service, and assignment
Card image data format changes during the study period. Data on the
offender and the case files include time of ar·
Part 1 rest, Information on arresting offiCEr, original
Incidents investigating officer and principal investigating
rectangular file structure offiCEr, offense and victim Gharacteristics, ar-
273 cases restee characteristics, available evidence,
94 variables case processing Information, and arrestee's
80·unit·long record criminal history. Class IV
1 record per case
Universe: All police officers In the Baltimore
Part 2 County Police Department and all felonies
Participants committed between April 1, 1984 and Novem-
rectangular file structure ber 30,1985 in Baltimore County, Maryland.
1,006 cases
8 variables Sampling: The sample for the officer file con-
aO·unit-long record sisted of all police officers on patrol in four
1 record per case shifts In the Western and Eastern Divisions of
the Baltimore County Police Department dur-
Related Publications: Ing the period April 1, 1984 through Novem-
I<lein, M.W., M.A. Gordon, and C.L. Maxson ber 30, 1985. The target population was all
"The impact of pollr.e inVestigations on po. felony cases (except homicide, rape/other
lice·reported rates of gang and non·gang sex offenses, and child abuse) from police
homicides: Criminology 24 (1986), 489· and prosecutor records for the time period
512. April 1, 1984 through November 30, 1984 and
Klein, M.W., M.A. Gordon, and C.L. Maxson April 1, 1985 through November 30, 1985.
"Differences between gang and non·gang
homicides." Criminology 23 (1985), 209· Note: For reasons of confidentiality police offi-
222. cer badge numbers wtJre replaced with
Klein, M.W., C.L. Maxson, and M.A. Gordon unique identifiers In each of the flies. Data on
"Evaluation of an imported gang violence the individualized feedback report should not
deterrence program: Final report: Univer· be used for purposes of analysis due to prob-
sity of Southern California, 1984. lems in implementing this portion of the study.

Extent of collection: 3 data files + SPSS con-


trol cards
Martin, Susan Logical record length data format
Improving evidence collection through
police-prosecutor coordination In Part 1
Officer data
Baltimore, 1984-1985 rectangular file structure
(lCPSR 9290) 501 cases
24 variables
This study was sponsored by the United States 78-unit·long record
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus· 1 record per case
tice. The grant number is 84·IJ·CX·0075.

Summary: The purpose of this data collection


was to investigate the effects of changes in
police evidence procedures and the effects of
providing feedback to officers on felony case

172 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 2 McCampbell, Michael S.
Offender data
rectangular file structure National survey of field training
1,440 cases programs for police officers, 1985-1986
85 variables
235-unlt-long record (ICPSR 9350)
1 record per case
This study was sponsored by the United States
Part 3 Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
Case data tice. The grant number Is BS-IJ-CX-0039.
rectangular file structure
1,622 cases Summary: This national survey of field train-
85 variables ing programs for police officers contains data
235-unit-long record gathered from state and local criminal justice
1 record per case agencies regarding the format of their pro-
grams, costs of programs, impact on civil li-
Related Publication: ability suits, and other complaints. Topics cov-
Martin, Susan ered Include length of time since the
"Improving evidence collection through po- Implementation of the program, reasons for In-
lice-prosecutor coordination." Unpubiished Itiating the program, objectives of the pro-
final report submitted to the National Insti- gram, evaluation criteria and characteristics
tute of Justice, 1987. of the program, and number of dismlGsals
based on performance In field training pro-
grams. Other topics deal with hours of class-
room training, characteristics of field service
training otticers, and Incentives for pursuing
Matulia, Kenneth J. this position. Topics pertaining to agency
evaluation Include impact of program on the
Police use of deadly force, 1970-1919 number of civil liability complaints, number of
(iCPSR 9018) successful equal employment opportunity
complaints, presence of alternative training
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States such as with a senior officer, and additional
Department of Justice, National Instttute 01 Jus- classroom training during probation when
~ce. The grant number Is 79-NI-AX-0131. there Is no field training program. Class IV
Funding also was received from the Interna-
tional Association of Chiefs of Police. Universe: Law enforcement agencies In the
United States.
Summary: The circumstances surrounding
"Justifiable homicides" by police are the focus Bampllng: A stratified random s.:lmple was se-
of this data collection which examines occur- lected from a list of 588 state and local law en-
rences In 57 U.S. cities during the period forcement agencies provided by the National
1970-1979. Incidents Include homicides by Criminal Justice Reference Service.
on- and off-duty police officers serving com-
munities of 250,000 or more. Data were col- Extent of collection: 2 data files
lected through a survey questionnaire sent to
police executives of the 57 cities. The Federal Card Image data format
Bureau of Investigation supplied data on justi-
fiable homicide by police and civilians, includ- Part 1
ing age, sex, and race data The variables in- Field training program data
clude number of sworn officers; number of rectangular file structure
supervisory officers; average years of educa- 183 cases
tion; department regulations about such 107 variables
issue~ as off-duty employment, uniforms, car- 80-unit-long record
rying firearms, and discipUnary actions, in- 11 records per case
service training, firearms practice, assign-
ments without firearms; on-duty deaths; and Part 2
off-duty deaths. There are 26 records In the No field training program data
dataset. The study was funded by a grant rectangular file structure
from the National Institute of Justice to the In- 104 cases
ternational Association of Chiofs of Police. The 6 variables
file has a logical record length of 132 charac- 80-unlt-long record
ters. Class IV 1 record per case

Police 173
Related Publication: Orne, Martin T. and Wayne G. Whnehouse
McCampbell, M.S.
"Fjeld training for police officers: State of Use and effectiveness of hypnosis and
the art" (research in brief). Washington, the cognitive Interview for enhancing
DC: National Institute of Justice, 1986. eyewitness recall: Philadelphia,
1988-1989
(lCPSR 9478)
Monkkonen, Eric
This study was sponsored by the United States
Police departments, arrests and crime Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
In the United States, 186()"1920 tice. The grant number is 87 -IJ-CX-0052.

(ICPSR 7708) Summary: This study investigated the effec-


tiveness of hypnosis and the cognitive inter-
These data on nineteenth and early twentieth view (a technique for stimulating memory) on
century police departments and arrest behav- the recall of events In a criminal incident. The
ior were collected between 1975 and 1978 by data collected In the study address the follow-
Eric Monkkonen for a study of police and ing questions: (1) Does hypnosis or the cogni-
crime In the United States. Two of the da- tive interview mitigate recall deficits that result
tasets report time series data on 23 American from emotionally upsetting events? (2) Does
cities for the period 1860-1920. The data, hypnosis or the cognitive interview Improve re-
which are present for most but not all of the call when individuals recall events in narrative
years in this time span, were drawn from an- fashion? (3) Does hypnosis or the cognitive in-
nual reports of police departments, found in terview Improve recall when individuals are re-
the Ubrary of Congress or In newspapers and quired to respond to each item in a set of fo-
legislative reports located elsewhere. Vari- cused questions? (4) Does the cognitive
ables In the raw data fiie include arrests for interview Improve recali better than motivated
drunkenness, conditional offenses and homi- control recall procedures? For this two-stage
cides, persons dismissed or haid, police per- study, subjects were randomly assigned to re-
sonnel and population. The second file aggre- ceive hypnosis, cognitive interview, or control
gates by year and reports some of these treatment. Stage 1 Involved completing unre-
variables on a per capita basis using a linear lated qUestionnaires and viewing a short film
interpoiation from the last decennial census in containing an emotionally upsetting criminal
order to estimate population. Data for 267 event. Stage 2 was conducted 3 to 13 days
United States cities for the period 1880-1890 iater (the average was 6.5 days) and involved
are from the 1880 federal census volume, Re- baseline information gathering about the
port on the Defective, Dependent, and Delin- events in the film, application of the assigned
quent Classes, published in 1888, and the treatment, and post-treatment written recall of
1890 federal census volume Social Statistics the events. Data were collected from the writ-
of Cities. Information includes police person- ten narratives provided by subjects and from
nel and expenditures, arrests, persons held an oral forced recall of events in a post-experi-
overnight, trains entering town and popula- mental interview. Variables in File 1 inciude to-
tion. "Raw data from 23 U.S. Cities, 1860- tal information (correct, incorrect, confabula-
1920" contains 1,179 cases (1 case per city tions, and attributions) as well as new
per year) and 14 variables (Class II); "Aggre- information given in the post-treatment written
gated U.S. Cities, 1860-1920" contains 61 narrative. The remaining variables in File 1 in-
cases (1 per year) and 9 variables (Class II); dude score on Harvard Group Scale of Hyp-
"U.S. Cities, 1880-1890" contains 267 cases notic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A), re-
and 15 variables. Class IIi pressor status, and number of days between
viewing the film and completing the baseline
Related Publications: and post-treatment interviews. Variables in
Monkkonen, Eric Fiie 2 were derived from the post-experimen-
"Toward a dynamic theory of crime and tal oral forced recall interview and include to-
the police: A criminal justice system per- tal correct and incorrect responses and confi-
spective.· Historical Methods Newsletter dence ratings for correct and incorrect
(Fall, 1977) 157-165. responses. The unit of observation is the indi-
Monkkonen, Eric vidual. Class IV
"Sources for criminal justice history." Juur-
nal of Interdisciplinary History (Winter Universe: All university students in Philadel-
1978). phia, Pennsylvania

174 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Note: The size of the samples used can result Ostrom, BinCX", Roger B. Parks, and
In moderate sampling errors. The use of a ho- Gordon P. Whnaker
mogeneous sample of young adult volunteers
makes it difficult to assess the generalizability Police referral practices and social
of the findings to demographically dissimilar service agency practices In three
populations. The information contained in the metropolitan areas, 1977
data files is limited to the various measures
derived from the baseline and post-treatment (lCPSR 7791)
narratives and the post-experimental forced
recall interview. This study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
Extent of collection: 2 data files tice. The grant number is 78-NI-AX-0Q20.

Card imags data format and SPSSX export Summary: The dataset contains two related
files studies conducted in the metropolitan areas
of st. Louis, Missouri; Tampa - St. Peters-
Part 1 burg, Florida; and RochestEJ", New York. The
Baseline and treatment data file study of police referral practices provides in-
rectangular file structure formation on the types of calls made to police
72 cases departments, the referrals made to social
20 variables service agencies from these calls, and the
SO-un it-long record pattern of citizen demands. Data for this
1 record per case study were collected from 26,465 calls for po-
lice service at 21 police departments. The 36
Part 2 variables include the nature of the call, char-
Post-experimental data file acteristics of the caller, and the type of
rectangular file structure agency receiving the referral. The sampling
72 cases frame for the study of social service agency
5 variables practices was any agency within the three
SO-un it-long record metropolitan areas that agreed to participate
1 record per case in the study, accepted police referrals, and
dealt with at least one of ten selected soclai
Part 3 concerns (e.g., drug abuse, suicide preven-
Baseline and treatment data: SPSSX tion, aid to the elderly). The study classifies
export file agencies according to the extent of their coop-
rectangular file structure eration with the police, the range of the social
72 cases services they provide, and their history of
20 variables service provision. Budget information was
SO-un it-long record also obtained to calculate the costs of alterna-
tive methods of social service delivery. Repre-
Part 4 sentatives of 103 agencies were interviewed
Post-experimental data: SPSSX export file and data were collected for 139 variables.
72 cases Data generated by the Social Service Agency
5 variables questionnaire are available in two machine-
SO-unlt-Iong record readable formats: precoded data and narra-
tive text. Class IV
Related Publication:
Orne, Martin T., and Wayne G. Whitehouse
"The use and effectiveness of hypnosis
and the cognitive interview for enhancing
eyewitness recall." Merion Station, PA: In- Ostrom, BinCX", Roger B. Parks, and
stiMe for Experimental Psychiatry, 1990. Gordon P. Whnaker
Police services study, Phase ", 1977:
Rochester, St. LOUis, and St. Petersburg
(ICPSR S605)

This study was sponsored by the United States


Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number Is 78-NI-AX-0020.

Police 175
Summary: The data for this study were col- Part 2
lected In order to examine the delivery of po- General shift information
lice services In selected neighborhoods. The rectangular file structure
performance of differently organized police 949 cases
agencies were compared as they delivered 170 variables
services to different sets of comparable neigh- 80-unit-long record
borhoods. Variables included In the study are 8 records per case
total number of encounters, number of con-
tacts with other officers, number of contacts Part 3
with non-police support units, characteristics Police encounters data
surrounding specific encounters, and citizen rectangular file structure
satisfaction. Class IV 5,688 cases
594 variables
Note: The entire dataset consists of 19 files: SO-unit-long record
four are currently available. There are several 20 records per case
aspects of the data which require mention: (1)
Column locations and widths of variables Part 4
noted in the data collection coding guides do Victimization survey data
not describe the data in its present format. rectangular file structure
Some of the variables noted in these coding 12,019 cases
guides have also been deleted from the data. 273 variables
Users should refer to the SPSS-X control SO-unit-Iong record
cards provided or the SPSS-X DISPLAY DIC- 6 records per case
TIONARY program for the current variable list
and column locations. (2) The General Shift Related Publication:
Data file contains a variable named Smith, Douglas A.
TIMERUN. The values for this variable are in- "Invoking the law: Determinants of police
correct. Analysis utilizing the variable will prob- arrest decisions." Unpublished PhD. dis-
ably be misleading. Users of this file will note sertation, Indiana University, 1982.
that 49 shifts are represented twice in the
data This occurred because a single ob-
server was unable to observe a shift in its en-
tirety, thus requiring that the shift be split be-
tween two members of the research team. Pate, Antony M. and Sampson O. Annan
The split shift was then coded as two cases in Community policing In Baltimore,
the data. (3) Value labels are not provided in 1986-1987
the data dictionary files for the variables identi-
fying the observed neighborhoods, because (ICPSR 9401)
these labels are unique in each jurisdiction.
The variables identifying the neighborhoods This study was sponsored by the United States
contain some values which are not identified Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
on the list of jurisdictions and neighborhoods. tice. The grant number is OO-IJ-CX-0003.
These values refer to combinations of neigh-
borhoods. (4) The variable identifying the ob- Summary: This data collection was designed
served shift contains values which are not in- to investigate the effects of foot patrol and om-
cluded in the original format of the variable. It budsman policing on perceptions of the inci-
is not known which shifts these values refer dence of crime and community policing prac-
to. (5) SPSSX control cards are not available tices in Baltimore, Maryland. Data collected at
for Part 4 of the dataset. Wave 1 measured perceptions of crime and
community policing practices before the two
Extent of collection: 4 data files + SPSS con- new policing programs were introduced. Fol-
trol cards low-up data for Wave 2 were collected ap-
proximately one year later and were designed
Card image data format to measure the effects of the new policing
practices. Included on the instrument were
Part 1 questions on the perceived incidence of vari-
Citizen debriefing data ous crimes, police effectiveness and pres-
rectangular file structure ence, disorder, property and personal crime
1,675 cases and the likelihood of crime in general, feelings
152 variables of safety, crime avoidance behaviors and the
80-unlt-long record use of crime prevention devices, cohesion
5 records per case and satisfaction with neighborhoods, and

176 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


awareness of victimization and victimization Petersllia, Joan, Allen Abrahamse, and
history. The Instrument also Included demo- James Q. Wilson
graphic questions on employment, education,
race, and Income. Class IV Police performance and case attrition
In Los Angeles County, 1980-1981
Universe: All residents of Baltimore, Maryland.
(ICPSR 9352)
Sampling: Multistage sampling based on
neighborhood socioeconomics. ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Justice, Nationa Institute of Jus-
Note: The combination file contains all cases tice. The grant number III 85-IJ-CX-0072.
With data In both Waves 1 and 2, Including all
variables from each wave. Summary: The purpose of this data collection
was to Investigate the effects of crime rates,
Extent of collection: 3 data files + machine- city characteristics, and police departments' fi-
readable documentation nancial resources on felony case attrition
rates In 28 cities located in Los Angeles
Logical record length data format County, California Demographic data for this
collection were obtained from the 1983
Part 1 COUNTY AND CITY DATA BOOK. Arrest
Wave 1 data were collected directly from the 1980
rectangular file structure and 1981 CALIFORNIA OFFENDER BASED
921 cases TRANSACTION Sf ATISTICS (OBTS) data
229 variables files maintainod by the California Bureau of
250-unit-long record Criminal Statistics. City demographic vari-
1 record per case ables Include total popUlation, minority popula-
tion, population aged 65 years or older, num-
Part 2 ber of female-headed families, number of
Wave 2 Index crimes, number of families below the
rectangular file structure poverty level, city expenditures, and police ex-
636 cases penditures. City arrest data Include Informa-
217 variables tion on number of arrests disposed and num-
232-unit-long record ber of males, females, blacks, and whites
1 record per case arrested. Also Included are data on the num-
ber of cases released by police, denied by
Part 3 prosecutors, and acquitted, and data on the
Combination number of convicted cases given prison
rectangular file structure terms. Class IV
636 cases
446 variables Universe: Cities In Los Angeles County,
250-unit-long record California
1 record per case
Sampling: Eligible cities met all of the follow-
Related Publication: ing criteria: (1) the city's demographic data
Pate, A.M., and S.O. Annan were published in the 1983 COUNTY AND
"The Baltimore community policing experi- CITY DATA BOOK, (2) the police department
ment: Summary report" (draft report sub- made more than 300 felony arrests per year,
mitted to the National Institute of Justice). and (3) the police department agreed to par-
Washington, DC: The Police Foundation, ticipate in the study. Rlteen arresting agen-
1989. cies, including the Los Angeles Police Depart-
ment and Los Angeles County Sheriff's
Office, were excluded.

Note: The data for the 28 cities are broken


into seven files. Numeric variables contain ai-
phabetics and leading blanks.

Extent of collection: 7 data files

Card image data format

Police 177
Parts 1-7 filed agalnst the defendant, the manner in
Dala, sections 1·7 which the case was adjudicated (dismissal,
rectangular file structure guilty plea, final case), the final case out-
2Scases come, and the sentence given the defendant.
9 variables There are eight files in this dataset. Each of
SO-unlt-Iong record the four cities has one file for cases with
1 record per case physical evidence and one file for cases
where physical evidence was not collected or
Related Publication: examined. The number of cases varies In the
Petersllla, J., A. Abrahamse, and J.Q. Wilson tiles, with the total number of cases being
·Police performance and case attrition." 2,659 and the approximate number of vari-
Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corpora- ables being 120. Each file has a logical re-
tion,19S7. cord length of SO. Class IV

Peterson, Joseph L., Steve Mlhajlovic, and Reiss, Albert J., Jr.
Michael Gilliland
I~ttltudes and perceptions of police
Forensic evidence and the police, officers In Boston, ChIcago, and
1976·1980 Washington, DC, 1966
(ICPSR S186) (ICPSR 90S7)

T1is study was sponsored by the United States This study was sponsored by the United
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- States Department of Justice, Office of Law
tice. The grmt number is 82-IJ-CX-0064. Enforcement Assistance. The grant number Is
OLEA-006.
Summary: The data in this collection focus on
adult cases in the serious crime categories of Summary: This survey was designed to ex-
homicide (and related death Investigations), plore perceptions and attitudes of police offi-
rape, robbery, aggravated assaulVbattery, bur- cers of three metropolitan areas toward their
glary, and arson. Data for four cities are In- work and the organizations and publics with
cluded In this dataset: Peoria, Chicago, Kan- which they Interact. Issues of interest Include
sas City, and Oakland. A sampling approach (1) the nature of police careers and police
was used In Chicago, Oakland, and Kansas work and officers' satisfaction with their jobs,
City, the largest jurisdictions, while all crimes (2) officers' orientations toward policing tasks
processed by the crime laboratory In Peoria and their relationships with the public, and (3)
were Included. Three sources are used for officers' perceptions of organizations and sys-
the collection: police, court, and laboratory re- tems that influence or change police work.
cords. The primary source Is police case tiles. Class IV
These tiles consist of all reports submitted by
police personnel during an Investigation of a Universe: Police officers in major metropoli-
suspected criminal offense, including the in- tan areas of the United States.
itial report taken by the responding patrol offi-
cer, the detective's reports, all follow-up sup- Sampling: Three sample cities (Chicago, Bos-
plemental reports, statements taken from ton, and Washington, DC) were purposively
witnesses and possible suspects, arrest re- selected to represent differences in the size,
ports, a detailed report describing the evi- location, degree of control, and type of organi-
dence collected by the evidence technician, zation in police departments. Within each city,
and other documents. Crime laboratory re- two police precinctrl (four in Washington, DC)
ports are also Included in this dataset. These with high crime rates were selected to repre-
tiles contaln information identifying the evi- sent areas with different race and class com-
dence submitted, the examiner's work sheets positions. The selected sites were (1) Boston,
and notes, photographs, the final laboratory MA (Dorchester and Roxbury precincts), (2)
results of the sclentisrs examinations, and Chicago, IL (Fillmore and Town Hall pre-
often notes made by the scientist of conversa- cincts), and (3) Washington, DC (precincts 6,
tions with investigating officers. Finally, prose- 10,13, and 14). Simple random samples of
cutor or COLirt files were reviewed for informa- approximately 25 police officers In each of the
tion regarding the dispositions of suspects eight precincts were drawn from department
who were arrested and formally charged. The rosters. The response rate was nearly 100
records provide the initial and final charges percent.

178 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Note: Several of the variables were coded as ter, individuals' definitions of the situation after
OSIRIS "multiple response" variables. When the arrival of police, specific police actions
a program such as SPSS translates the and manner of police behavior during the en-
OSIRIS dictionary, It converts the multiple re- counter, and informal characterizations by po-
sponse categories into variables, thus ex- lice of participants involved in the encounter.
panding the total number of variabies In the In cases where offender suspects were in-
dataset. The number of variables reported by volved, Information was collected on re-
SPSS is given beloN. These data are part of straints employed, searches, Interrogations,
a larger study entitled "Reid Surveys Iii: Stud- confessions, advisement of rights, booking,
ies in Crime and Law Enforcement In Major and other arrest processes. Class IV
Metropolitan Areas." ICPSR distributes two re-
lated data collections: Survey of victimiza- Universe: All encounters between citizens
tion and attitudes towards crime and law and police in major metropolitan areas of the
enforcement in Boston and Chicago, 1966 United States.
(ICPSR 9085) :wi Patterns of behavior in
police and citizen transactions: Boston, Sampling: Three sample cities (Chicago, Bos-
Chicago, and Washington, DC, 1966 ton, and Washington, DC) were purposively
(ICPSR 9086). selected to represent differences in the size,
location, degree of control, and type of organi-
Extent of collection: 1 data file + OSIRIS zation In police departments. Within each city,
dictionary two police precincts (four in Washington, DC)
with high crime rates were solected to repre-
Logical record lengt~1 data format sent areas with different race and class com-
positions. The selected sites were: (1) Bos-
rectangular file structure ton, MA (Dorchester and Roxbury precincts),
203 cases (2) Chicago, IL (Fillmore and Town Hall pre-
607 variables cincts), and (3) Washington, DC (precincts 6,
672-unit-long record 10,13, and 14). Stratified probability samples
1 record per case of police tours of duty were drawn. Evening
and weekend shifts were overrepresented
Related Publication: to maximize the number of encounters
Reiss, AJ., Jr. (ed.) observed.
"Studies in crime and law enforcement in
major metropolitan areas." U.S. Presi- Note: Each of the files in this collection is ac-
dent's Commission on law Enforcement companied by an OSIRIS dictionary that pro-
and the Administration of Justice Field Sur- vides variable locations and abbreviated vari-
vey ill, Vol. II, Section II. Washington, DC: able labels. Codebooks are available for Part
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967. 2 and Part 6 only. Facsimiles of the original
coding forms are availabie for Parts 1, 2, 3,
and 6. These forms may provide enough infor-
mation for some types of analyses depending
Reiss, Albert J., Jr. on the variables of interest. Several of the
variables In these files were coded as OSIRIS
Patterns of behavior In police and "multiple response" variables. When a pro-
citizen transactions: Boston, Chicago, gram such as SPSS translates the OSIRIS
dictionary, It converts the multiple response
and Washington, DC, 1966
categories into variables, thus expanding the
(ICPSR 9086) total number of variables in the dataset. The
number of variables SPSS reports for these
This study was sponsored by the United files are given belem. TrSlse data are part of a
States Department of Justice, Office of Law larger study entitled "Fieid Surveys III: Stud-
Enforcement Assistance. The grant number is ies in Crime and Law Enforcement In Major
OLEA-OOO. Metropolitan Areas." ICPSR distributes two re-
lated data collections: Survey of victimiza-
Summary: These data have been influential tion and attitudes towards crime Imd law
in the development of theories of police be- enforcement in Boston and Chicago, 1966
havia. Variables in the collection suppiy infor- (ICPSR 9086) and Attitudes and percep-
mation on the nature and context of encoun- tions of police officers in Boston, Chi-
ters between citizens and the police. Data are cago, and Washington, DC, 1966 (ICPSR
included on the characteristics and roles of in- 90B7).
dividuals involved in an encounter, relation-
ships among the participants in the encoun-

Police 179
Extent of collection: 5 data files + OSIRIS Reiss, Albert J., Jr.
dictionaries
SUivey of victimization and attitudes
logical record length data format towards crime and law enforcement In
Boston and Chicago, 1966
Part 1
General data: Observers' summaries of (ICPSR 9085)
recorded encounters
rectangular file structure this study was sponsored by the United
840 cases States Department of Justice, Office of Law
679 variables Enforcement Assistance. The grant number Is
868-unlt-long record OLEA-OOO.
1 record per case
Summary: This data collection was designed
Part 2 to explore attitudes toward crime and the po-
Police initiated encounters lice and to examlrle factors related to criminal
rectangular file structure victimization and the reporting of crime Inci-
738 cases dents to the police. It combines a victimization
752 variables survey with data on citizens' attitudes toward
939-unlt-long record crime and the police ond Information on be-
1 record per case havior In response to crime or the threat of
crime. Variables provide Information about
Part 3 neighborhood characteristics, Individual
Citizen initiated contacts with police in demographic attributes (e.g. age, race, gen-
field areas der, edUcation, Income, religion, marital
rectangular file structure status), perception of crime, social environ-
282 cases ment, the criminal justice system, experi-
721 variables ences with the police, criminal victimization
907-unlt-long record experiences, protective measures taken, vic-
1 record per case tim·offender relationship, characteristics of
the crime Incident, police response to crime
Part 4 reports, and victim perceptions of and satis-
Police dispatch records faction with police response. Clrus IV
rectangular file structure
6,172 cases Universe: The adult population (any house-
25 variables hold member 18 years or older) In major met-
43-unit-long record ropolitan areas of the United States.
1 record per case
Sampling: Precincts were selected to repre-
PartS sent high and low Income populations living in
Service-called initiated encounter high crime areas. Within areas, probability
rectangular file structure samples werF3 drawn. The sites selected were
4,371 cases Boston, MA (Dorchester and Roxbury pre-
719 variables cincts) and Chicago, IL (Fillmore and Town
900-unit-long record Hall precincts).
1 record per case
Note: While OSIRIS dictionaries providing
Related Publications: variable locations and abbreviated variable la-
Friedrich, R.J. bels accompany both files In this collection,
"The impact of organizational, individual, only Part 1, Contact Data, is documented by
and situational factors on police behavior." a codebook. The only additional documenta-
Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Depart- tion available for Part 2, Resident Data, is a
ment of Political Science, University of facsimile of the original coding form. There is,
Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1977. however, considerabie overlap between the
Reiss, A.J., Jr. two parts, and the Contact Data codebook
The police and the public. New Haven, can be used for Resident Data also. Many of
CT: Yale University Press, 1971. the variables were originally coded as
Reiss, A.J., Jr. OSIRIS "multiple response" variables. When
"Systematic observation of natural social a program such as SPSS translates the
phenomena." In Herbert L Costner (ed.), OSIRiS dictionary, it converts the multiple
Sociological Methodology, 1971. San categories into variables, thus expanding the
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 1971. total number of variables In the dataset. The

180 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


numbers of variables SPSS reports are given Snortum, John R., et at
balON. These data are part of a larger study
entitled "Aeld SUrveys III: Studies In Crime Police documentation of drunk driving
and Law Enforcement In Major Metropolitan arrests, 1984·1987: Los Angeles,
Areas." ICPSR distributes two related data Denver, and Boston
collections: Patterns of behavior in police
and citizen transactions: Boston, Chi- (ICPSR 9400)
cago, and Washington, DC, 1966 (ICPSR
9086), and Attitudes and perceptions of po- This stud'i was sponsored by the United States
lice officers in Boston, Chicago, and Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
Washington, DC, 1966 (ICPSR 9087). tice. The gralt number Is 86-IJ·CX-0056.

Extent of collection: 2 data flies + OSIRIS Summary: These data measure the etfects of
dictionaries blood alcohol content coupled with officer re-
ports at the time of arrest on driVing while in-
logical record length data format toxicated (OWl) case outcomes Qury verdicts
and guilty pleas). Court records and relevant
Part 1 police reports for drunk driving cases drawn
Contact data from the greater metropolitan areas of Bos-
rectangular file structure ton, Denver, and Los Angeles were complied
343 cases to produce this data collection. Cases were
1,836 variables selected to Include roughly equal proportions
1,925·unlt·long record of guilty pleas, guilty verdicts, and not guilty
1 record per case verdicts. OWl cases were compared on the
quality and quantity of evidence concerning
Part 2 the suspect's b!1havlor, with the evidence
Resident data coming from any mention of 20 standard vis-
rectangular file structure ual detection cues prior to the stop, 13 attrib-
1,469 cases utes of general appearance and behavior Im-
1,469 variables mediately after the stop, and the results of as
1,986·unlt·long record many as seven field sobriety tests. Questions
1 record per case Included driving under the Influence cues
(scoring sheet), observed traffic violations
Related Publications: and actual traffic accidents, the verdict, DWI
Reiss, A.J., Jr. (ed.) history, whether the stop resulted from an ac-
"Studies In crime and law enforcement In cident, whether the attorney was public or pri-
major metropolitan areas." U.S. Presi- vate, and sanctions that followed the verdict.
dent's Commission on Law Enforcement Also Included were demographic questions
and the Administration of Justice Field Sur- on age, sex, and ethnlcity. Class IV
vey III, Vol. I, Section I. Washington, DC:
United States Government Printing Office, Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
1967. readable documentation
Reiss, A.J., Jr. (ad.)
"Studies In crime and law enforcement In Card Image data format
major metropolitan areas." U.S. Presi-
dent's Commission on Law Enforcement rectangular file structure
and the Administration of Justice Field Sur- 617 cases
vey III, Vol. I, Section iI. Washington, DC: 112 variables
United States Government Printing Office, 77-unit·long record
1967. 2 records per case
Related Publication:
Berger, D.E., J.R. Snortum, R.J. Homel, R.
Hauge, and W. Loxley
"Oaterrence and prevention of alcohol-Im-
paired driving In Australia, the United
States, and Norway." Justice Quarterly 7
(1989),453-465.

Police 181
Berger, D.E., J.R. Snortum, R.J. Homel, R. Stillman, Frances A.
Hauge, and W. Loxley
·Soclal, cultural, and legal Influences on aI· Concerns of police sUlVlvors, 1986:
cohol-Impalred driving: compliance In Aus- [United states]
tralia, the United States, and Norway."
Chicago, IL: Paper presented at T89 • In- (ICPSR 9327)
ternational Conference on Alcohol, Drugs,
and Traffic Safety, October 1989. This study was sponsored by the United States
Snortum, J.R., et aI. Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
·Pollce documentation of drunk driving ar- tice. The grant number Is 85-IJ-CX-0012.
rests: Jury verdicts and gUilty pleas as a
function of quantity and quality of evl- Summary: This data collection was designed
dance." Journal Of Criminal Justice 18 to assess the Impact of IIne-of-duty deaths of
(1990),99-116. law enforcement officers on their family mem-
bers In terms of the psychological, emotional
and financial effects. To assess the Impact of
the traumatic event, a wide varlet)! of clinical
and psychiatric measures of psychological
Spelman, WIlliam and Dale K Brown disorder were used. The data are stored In
two files. Included In the first file are variables
Calling the police: CItizen reporting of concerning the respondents' personal charac-
sorlous crime, 1979 teristics such as age, sex, ethnic origin marl·
(ICPSR 8185) tal status, educational level, relationship to
deceased offlca', and employment. Also In-
Tfls study was sponsored by the United States cluded are the deceased officer's demo-
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- graphic characteristics such as age at time of
tice. The grant number Is 78-NI-AX-0107. death, sex, ethnic origin, educatIonal level,
number of times married, number of years In
Summary: This dataset replicates the citizen law enforcement, and date and time of the In-
reporting component of the Kansas City, Mis- claent. Also Included are experiences and
souri Police Department's Response 11me emotional reactions to the death of the officer
Analysis. Information Is Included on 3,300 re- and clinical symptoms of psychological dis-
ported crime Incidents of aggravated asflault, tress. The second tile contains variables on
motor vehicle theft, burglary, larceny-theft, the respondent's relationship with friends and
forcible rape, and robbery. The data cover citi- relatives before and after the traumatic avant
zen calls to police between April 21 and De- behavioral changes of survivors' children fol- '
cember 7, 1979. There are four files to this da- lewlng the death, financial Impacts on survi-
taset, one each for Jacksonville, Florida; vors, and satisfaction with treatment and re-
Peoria, Illinois; Rochester, New York; and sponses recalved from police departments.
San Diego, California The data are taken Class IV
from police dispatch records and Interviews of
citizens requesting police assistance. The Universe: Surviving spouses of police officers
variables taken from the dispatch records In- killed between November 1982 and February
clude the dispatch times, CC\JI priority, police 1986 In the United States.
travel time, age, sex, and race of the calla', re-
sponse code, number of suspects, and aroa Restrictions: Data also were collected on the re-
of t!1e city In which the call originated. The actions of pollee department offlclcals but this
variables taken from the citizen Interviews In- file was not made available for archiving by the
clude res~ondent's r~le In the Incident (Victim, orlginallnvestigallon. For further Information
calla', victim-caller, witness-caller), incident lo- contact the principal Investigator cirectly. '
cation, relationship of caller to victim, number
of victims, Identification of suspect, Interaction Extent of collection: 2 data files
with police, and others. There are approxi-
mately 250 variables In this dataset. Each file Logical record length data format
has a logical record length of 80. Class IV
Part 1
Survivor demographic information
recta'1gular file stnJcture
174 cases
182 variables
244-unit-long record
1 record per case

182 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 2 counters involving 2,555 citizens in this collec-
Survivor relationship information tion, and the data reside [n two files. There
rectangular file structure are three cards per case in the Shift Level
174 cases Data File and sixteen cards per case in the
78 variables Encounter Level Data File. Missing data were
92-unit-long record recoded to 9's by the Principal Investigator
1 record per case and can mean either actual missing data or
unknown or inapplicable data The logical re-
Related Publications: cord length of both files is 80 characters.
Stillman, F. Class IV
"Une-of-duty deaths: SUrVivor and depart-
mental responses· (research in brief).
Washington DC: National Institute of Jus-
tice,1987.
Stillman, F.
Triplett, Ruth, et al.
"Psychological responses of surviving City police expenditures, 1946-1985:
spouses of public safety officers kllied acci- [United Statss]
dentally or feloniously in the line of duty."
Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Johns (ICPSR 8706)
Hopkins University.
Summary: This study examines police expen-
ditures for selected cities for an extended pe-
riod of time. The data set contains one vari·
Teplin. Linda A able per year for each of the following items:
total general expenditures, expenditure for po-
Keeping the peace: Pollee discretion lice protection, deflated general expenditures
and the mentally disordered In adjusted for inflation, deflated police expendi-
Chicago, 1980·1981 tures adjusted for Inflation, residential popula-
tion, land area, patterns of population change
(ICPSR 8438) during the study period, government Identifica-
tion, and implicit price deflators of goods and
This study was sponsored by the United States services. Class IV
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number is 81-IJ-CX-4079. Universe: Cities In the United States.

Summary: Data on police-citizen encounters Sampllng: All cities that had 50,000 or more
were collected to explore the peace keeping residents in 1940 or entered that size ciass
lunctions of the police and their handling of during the study period. All towns and town-
encounters with mentally ill persons. The data ships in Connecticut, MassachUsetts, New
were gathered through observations by re- Jer~ey and Pennsylvania were Included.
searchers riding in police cars in two Chicago
police districts during a 14-month period in Extent of collection: 1 data file
1980-1981. There are two parts to this da-
taset. First, information was collected once Logical record length data format
per shift on the general level of activity during
the shift and the observer's perceptions of rectangUlar file structure
emotions/attitudes displayed by the police offi- 6,944 casas
cers he/she observed. Also, information is in- 216 variables
cluded for each of the 270 shifts about the 80-unit·long record
personal characteristics, work history, and 1 record per case
worl<lng relationships of the police officers ob-
served. The second part of the dataset con-
tains detailed information on each police-citi-
zen encounter including its nature, location,
police actions andlor responses, citizens in-
volved, and their characteristics and behavia.
A unique and consistent shift identification
number is attached to each encounter so that
information about police officer characteristics
from the first ("shift-level") part of the dataset
may be matched with the second ("encounter-
level") part. There are 1,382 police-citizen en-

Police 183
Uchida, Craig D. and Laure W. Brooks Part 2
Calls for service data
Violence against police: Baltimore rectangular file structure
County, Maryland, 1984·1986 15,916 cases
4 variables
(lCPSR 9347) 80·unlt·long record
1 record per case
This study was sponsored by the United States
Depa1ment of Justice, Natlon~ Institute of Jus· Related Publication:
tice. The gra1t number is 86·IJ·CX·OO22. Uchida, C.D., and L.W. Brooks
"Violence against the police: Assaults on
Summary: This data collection examines Indi- Baltimore County police officers." Unpub-
vidual and situational characteristics of nonfa· lished Final Report submitted to the Na-
tal assaults on police officers In the Baltimore tional Institute of Justice. College Park,
County Police Department. In the assault MD: University of Maryland, 1988.
data, variables Include (1) Information on the
officer such as age, race, sex, height, weight,
education, rank, assignment, years of experi·
ence, weapon, and Injury sustained, (2) Infor·
mation on the offender(s) such as age, race, Uchida, Craig D. and Timothy S. Bynum
sex, height, weight, weapon, Injury sustained,
and arrest status, and (3) Information on the Effects of "United states vs. Leon" on
actual situation and Incident itself such as police search warrant practices,
type of call anticipated, type of call encoun· 1984·1985
tered, type of location, numbers of persons
present (by role, e.g., assaulter, nonassaulter, (ICPSR 9348)
complainant, etc.), type of initial officer action
actions of suspect before assault, sabri· ' This study was sponsored by the United States
ety/drug use by suspects, and final disposl· Department of Justice, National Inst~ute of Jus-
tion. The calls for service data were collected tice. The grant number is as·IJ·CX·Q015.
to provide an indication of the frequency of
various types of calls. In these data, variables Summary: This data collection examines the
include time of call, Initial call category, dispo· impact of the Supreme Court decision In
sitlon code, and sheet 10. Class IV "UNITED STATES VS. LEON" on police
search warrant applications In seven jurisdic-
Universe: All calls for service in Baltimore tions. For this collection, which is one of the
County, Maryland from 1984 through 1986. few data collections currentiy available for the
study of warrant activities, data were gath-
Sampling: For the Calls for Service Data file ered from search warrant applications filed
an activity sample was based on calls for po. during a three·month period before the Leon
lice services that were received between decision and three months after it. Each war-
January 1,1987 and March 31,1987. From rant application can be tracked through the
this 90-day period, 14 days of calls were ran- criminal justice system to Its disposition. The
domly selected. file contains variables on the contents of the'
warrant such as rank of applicant, specific
Extent of collection: 2 data files area of search, offense type, material sought
basis of evidence, status of Informants, and '
Logical record length data format reference to good faith. Additional variables
concern the results of the warrant application
Part 1 and include items such as materials seized,
Assaults data arrest made, cases charged by prosecutor,
rectangular file structure type of attorney, whether a motion to sup-
1,550 cases press the warrant was filed, outcomes of mo-
11 0 variabl es tions, appeal status, and number of arres-
408-unit·long record tees. Class IV
1 record per case
Universe: All search warrants filed in the
United States In 1984 and 1985.

Extent of collection: 7 data files

Card image data format

184 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 1 Related Publications:
Jurisdiction of river Uchida, C.D., T. Bynum, D. Rogan, and D.
rectangular file structure Murasky
237 cases "Acting in good faith: The effects of United
235 variables States vs. Leon on the police and courts."
80-unlt-long record Arizona Law Rsvlew30 (1988), 467-495.
4 records per case Uchida, C.D., T. Bynum, D. Rogan, and D.
Murasky
Part 2 "The effects of United States vs. Leon on
Jurisdiction of mountain the police search warrant practices" (Re-
rectangular file structure search in Action, NCJ 106630). Washing-
87 cases ton, DC: National Institute of Justice, 1987.
235 variables
80-unlt-long record
4 records per case
Van Dulzend, Richard, L. Paul Sutton, and
Part 3
Jurisdiction of plains Charlotte A. Carter
rectangular file structure Search warrant procedures In seven
302 cases cities, 1984: [United Statesl
235 variables
80-unit-long record (ICPSR 8254)
4 records per case
This study was sponsored by the United
Part 4 States Department of Justice, Nationallnsti-
Jurisdiction of border tute of Justice. The grant numbers are 80-IJ-
rectangular file structure CX-0089 and 80-\J·CX·008S.
312 cases
235 variables summary: These data were collected by the
80-unit-long record National Center of State Courts In seven un-
4 records per case named cities. Court cases were Identified In
one of three ways: 1) observation during real-
Part 5 time Interviews; 2) court records of real-time
Jurisdiction of hill interviews; or 3) court records of hIstorical
rectangular file structure cases. The vaJiables In this dataset Include
25Bcases the rank of the law enforcement officer apply-
235 variables ing for the warrant; the type of agency apply-
80-unlt-long record ing for the warrant; general object of the
4 records per case search requested; specific area to be
searched; type of crime being Investigated;
PartS central offense named in the warrant; evi-
Jurisdiction of forest dence upon which the waJ'rant application is
rectangular file structure based; and disposition of the warrant applica-
209 cases tion. The data contain 128 variables, and
235 variables have a logicai record length of 80 characters.
80-unit-long record The data file has 8,352 records. There Is also
4 records per case a file of SPSS control cards, Class IV
Part 7
Jurisdiction of harbor
rectangular file structure
735 cases
235 variables
80-unit-long record
4 records per case

Police 185
Victimization

Bureau of Justice Statistics, cldent records Is 181. There are 172 vari·
U.S. Department of Justice abies and 39 files.
Commercial victimization surveys, The National Sample data collection has 18
1973·1975 [United States]: Cities liIes. The total number of cases is 188,271.
sample The data are fixed-length with a logical record
length of 230 characters. There are a total of
(ICPSR 8002} 203 variables. Class II

Commercial victimization surveys,


1973·1977 [United States): National
sample Bureau of Justice Statistics,
(ICPSR 8003) U.S. Department of Justice
National crime surveys: CIties sample,
The Commercial VictimIzation Surveys were 1972·1975 (complete sample)
collected as a component of the larger Na·
tlonal Crime Surveys. These surveys were (lCPSR 7658)
collected by the U.S. Bureau of the Census
for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Their pur· National crime surveys: Cities sample,
pose was to obtain current and reliable meas· 1972·1975 (person level file)
ures of serious crime in the United States by
relying on the public for information, not law (ICPSR 7658)
enforcement agencies.
The National Crime Surveys were designed
These surveys focus on two crimes relative to by the Bureau of Justice Statistics to obtain
business establishments, burglary and rob· detailed Information about crime and its vic·
bery. All types of business establishments are tims and consequences. The data were col·
included In the survey; political, cultural, and lected by the U.S. Bureau of the Census from
religiolls organizations. Each month one·sixth 1972·1975 in 26 different cities.
of the establishments In the sample were In·
terviewed. Thus, six months are necessary to Interviews were conducted with household
enumerate a full sample. During interviews, members in each household sampled and de·
bUsinesses were asked to report victimiza· tailed Information about each household or
tions which occurred during the six·month ref· personal victimization was recorded. The
erence period prior to the month of interview. data include type of crime, description of of·
Interviews Included questions about business fender, severity of crime, injuries or losses,
characteristics such as form of ownership, and demographic characteristics of the house-
size and type of business and presence or abo hold. Interviews were administered to differ·
sence of security measures. Screening ques· ent samples in 1972 and 1975 in At!anta, Bal·
tions were used to establish the occurrence timore, Cleveland, Dallas, Denver, Newark,
of any incidents of burglary or robbery. For reo Portland, and St. Louis. In 1973 and 1975 In·
ported incidents, detailed Information was terviews were conducted In Chicago, Detroit,
obtained. Los Angeles, Philadelphia, and New York. In
1974 only, interviews were conducted in Bos-
The Cities Sample includes data for 26 cities. ton, Buffalo, Cincinnati, Houston, Miami, Mil·
Interviews were conducted between 1972 waukee, Minneapolis, New Orleans, Oakland,
through 1975. The data are fixed·length with Pittsburgh, San Diego, San Francisco, and
a total of 119,301 cases. The logical record Washington, D.C.
length of both the business records and the in·

Victimization 187
For each year, the data are organized by city Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S.
Into 39 separate datasets. Each dataset Is hi- Department of Justice
erarchically structured In three levels. There
are 43 variables for an average of 6,028 National crime surveys: Crime school
households, 38 variables for an average of supplement, 1989
9,039 persons, and 199 variables for an aver-
age of 3, 138 Incidents per city per year. (lCPSR 9394)

Person level filo: The Archive has also com- Summary: This supplement to the National
pleted a person-Ieval subset file from the Na- Crime Surveys was designed to collect data
tional Crime Surveys: CIties Sample, 1972- on crime victimization In schools throughout
1975 (Complete Sample) dataset (ICPSR the United States. Student respondents were
7658). This subset was created In order to asked a series of questions to determine their
provide users with a file which Is easier to school attendance In the last six months.
work with but which preserves the charac- Other questions concerning their schools
teristics of the Cities Sample data In creating were posed including type of school, distance
this person-level file, a full sample of victims from home, and general attendance and
and a ten percent sample of non-victims for monitoring policies. The data include informa-
up to four Incidents was employed. Thus, a tion on response of school to student violation
maximum of four Incidents per victim have of rules, accessibility of drugs, and violence In
been retained in the subset file; the remain- school Including types of violence and stu-
der of the incidents were dropped from the dent reaction. Other variables cover general
file. In the entire Cities Sample, approxi- violent crimes, parsonallarceny crimes, and
mately 97 percent of the respondents in each household crimes and include information on
quarter report four or fewer incidents. These date, time, and place of crime. Demographic
data are in a rectangulcr, or flattened, file so characteristics of household members such
that for each incident retrieved for a respon- as age, sex, race, education, employment,
dent all of the variables in the incident record median family Income, and marital status are
are repeated as many times as there are inci- provided. Class III
dents. For respondents with fewer than four
incidents, the incident record variables will Universe: All persons In the United States 12
contaln missing data where Incidents did not years of age and older.
occur. There Is one subset file for each of the
26 cities represented in the Complete Cities Sampling: Stratified multistage cluster sample.
Sample. The person-level files are appropri-
ate for the analysis of victims or personal vic- Extent of collection: 1 data file
timizations. The data contain 877 variables.
As part of Its quality control procedures, Logical record length data format
ICPSR undertook a study using this data col-
lection to determine whether It CQuid replicate rectangular file structure
published figures from Bureau of Justice Sta- 15,353 cases
tistics (BJS) publications. Based on results of 319 variables
the analysis, ICPSR concluded that the BJS 536-unit-long record
datsets accurately represent published fig- 1 record per case
ures. The replication study was done on the
crime of robbery and used figures from the
three publications identified in Appendix E of
the the documentation for this collection. Re- Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S.
sults of comparisons of datset-derived esti-
mates with published estimates are now in- Department of Justice
clude in Appendix F. An attitude supplement National crime surveys: National
sub-sample from this survey is also available
as ICPSR 7663. Class I
sample, 1973·1983
(lCPSR 7635)

Summary: The National Crime Survey (NCS),


a study of personal and household Victimiza-
tion, measures victimization for six selected
crimes, including attempts. The NCS was de-
signed to achieve three primary objectives: to
develop detailed Information about the victims
and consequences of crime, to estimate the

188 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


number and types of crimes not reported to 310 variables for an average of 8,000 inci-
police, and to provide uniform measures of dents per quarter. (2) An expanded introdUC-
selected types of crime. The surveys cover tory section has been added to this data col-
the following types of crimes, Including at- lection to explain hierarchical datasets, rate
tempts: rape, robbery, assault, burglary, lar- estimating procedures, and standard error es-
cooy, and auto or motor vehicle theft. Crimes timating procedures. Additional Information on
such as murder, kJdnapplng, shoplifting, an, the sample also is provided.
gambling are not covered. Questlons de-
signed to obtain data on the characteristics Extent of collection: 51 data files + machine-
and circumstances of the victimization were readable documentation
asked in each Incident report. Items such as
time and place of occurrence, injuries suf- logical record length data format and OSIRIS
fered, medical expenses Incurred, number,
age, race and sex of offender(s), relationship Part 1
of offender(s) to victim (stranger, casual ac- 1973, incident level
quaintance, relative, etc.), and other detailed rectangular file structure
data. relevant to a complete description of the 28,782 cases
incident were included. Legal and technical 337 variables
terms, such as assault and larceny, were 549-unlt-long record
avoided during the interviews. Incidents were 1 record per case
later classified In more technical terms based
upon the presence or absence of certain ele- Part 2
ments. In addition, data were collected in the 1974, incidlmt level
study to obtain information on education, mi- rGCtanglJlar fill~ structure
gration, labor force status, occupation, and In- 32,312 cases
come. Incident-level extract files are available 337 variables
to provide users with a file that Is easy to ma- 549-unit ·long record
nipulate. The incident-level datasets contain 1 record per case
each incident record which appears in the full
sample file, the victim's person record, and Part 3
the victim's household Information. As ex- 1975, incident level
pected, these data include person and house- rectangular file structure
hold information for incidents only. Subsetted 32,747 cases
person-level files also are available. All of the 337 variables
variables for victims are repeated for a maxi- 549-unit-long record
mum of four incidents per victlm. There Is one 1 record per case
person-level subset file for each interview
quarter of the complete National Sample from Part 4
1973 to 1980. Class I 1976, incident level
rectangular file structure
Universe: Population of the United States 32,675 cases
over 12 years of age. 337 variables
549-unit-long record
Sampling: A national sample of households 1 record per case
drawn with a stratified multistage clUster pro-
cedure was used. Rotating subsamples were Part 5
reinterviewed at six-month intervals. Inter- 1977, incident level
views were conducted with each household rectangular file structure
member over 12 years old. In generating the 32,351 cases
person-level file, a full sample of victims and 337 variables
a 10 percent sample of non-vbtims for up to 549-l.Init-long record
four incidents was employed. 1 record per case

Note~ (1) Pa.is 101-110 are hierarchically Part 6


structured into mUltiple levels. For the 1973- 1978, incident level
1977 files, the hierarchy is three levels: house- rectangular file structure
hold, person, and incident. For the 1978-1982 26,229 cases
files, the hierarchy is four levels: header reo 337 variables
cord, household, person, and incident. There 549-unit-long record
are 103 variables for an average of 35,000 1 record per case
households per quarter, 102 variables for an
average of 65,000 persons per quarter, and

Victimization 189
Part 7 Part 52
1979, Incident level 1973 person level, third interview quarter,
rectangular file structure all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up
27,945 casas to iour incidents
337 variables rectangular file structure
549-unlt-long record 13,696 cases
1 record per case 935 variables
1,381-unit-long record
Part 8 1 record per case
1980, incident level
rectangular file structure Part 53
28,469 cases 1973 person level, fourth interview
337 variables quarter, all victims, 10 porcent
549-unlt-long record non-victims, for up to four incidents
1 record per case rectangular file structure
13,989 cases
Part 9 935 variables
1981, incident level 1,381-unit-iong record
rectangular file structure 1 record per case
29,261 cases
337 variables Part 54
549-unit-long record 1974 person level, first interview quarter,
1 record per case all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up
to four incidents
Part 10 rectangular file structure
1982, incident level 12,421 cases
rectangular file structure 935 variables
27,995 cases 1,381-unit-long record
337 variables 1 record per case
549-unlt-long record
1 record per case Part 55
1974 person level, second interview
Part 41 quarter, all victims, 10 percent
1973-1982, incident level: Concatenated non-victims, for up to four incidents
file rectangular file structure
rectangular file structure 12,243 cases
298,766 cases 935 variables
337 variables 1,381-unit-Iong record
549-unit-long record 1 record per case
1 record per case
Part 56
Part 50 1974 person level, third interview quarter,
1973 person level, first interview quarter, all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up
all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up to four incidents
to four incidents rectangular file structure
rectangular file structure 11,950 cases
6,171 cases 935 variables
935 variables 1,381-unit-long record
1,381-unit-long record 1 record per case
1 record per case
Part 57
Part 51 1974 person level, fourth interview
1973 person level, second interview quarter, all victims, 10 percent
quarter, all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up to four incidents
non-victims, for up to four incidents rectangular file structure
rectangular file structure 12,839 cases
6,167 cases 935 variables
935 variables 1,381-unit-long record
1,381-lJnit-long record 1 record per case
1 record per case

190 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 58 Part 64
1975 person level, first interview quarter, 1976 person level, third interview quarter,
all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up
to four incidents to four incidents
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
12,912 cases 12,533 cases
935 variables 935 variables
1,381-unit-long record 1,381-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 59 Part 65
1975 person lavel, second interview 1976 person level, fourth interview
quarter, all victims, 10 percent quarter, all victims, 10 percent
non-victims, for up to four incidents non-victims, for up to four incidents
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
12.759 cases 12,966 cases
935 variables 935 variables
1,381-unlt-long record 1,381-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 60 Part 66
1975 person level, third interview quarter, 1977 person level, first interview quarter,
all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up
to four incidents to four incidents
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
12,405 cases 12,792 cases
935 variables 935 variables
1,381-unlt-long record 1,381-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 61 Part 67
1975 person level, fourth interview 1977 person level, second interview
quarter, all victims, 10 percent quarter, all victims, 10 percent
non-Victims, for up to four incidents non-victims, for up to four incidents
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
12,948 cases 12,824 cases
935 variables 936 variables
1,381-unlt-long record 1,381-unlt-Ion9 record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 62 Part 68
1976 person level, first interview quarter, 1977 person level, third interview quarter,
all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up
to four incidents to four incidents
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
12,791 cases 12,673 cases
935 variables 935 variables
1,381-unlt-long record 1,381-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 63 Part 69
1976 person level, second interview 1977 person level, fourth interview
quarter, all victims, 10 percent quarter, all victims, 10 percent
non-victims, for up to four incidents non-Victims, for up to four incidents
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
12,668 cases 12,873 cases
935 variables 935 variables
1,381-unlt-long record 1,381-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Victimization 191
Part 70 Part 76
1978 person level, first interview quarter, 1979 person level, third interview quarter,
all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up
to four incidents to four incidents
rectangular tile structure rectangular file structure
12,158 cases 10,469 cases
935 variables 935 variables
1,381-unit-long record 1,381-unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 71 Part 77
1978 person level, second interview 1979 person level, fourth interview
quarter, all victims, 10 percent quarter, all victims, 10 percent
non-victims, for up to four incidents non-victims, for up to four incidents
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
11,011 cases 11,799 cases
935 variables 935 variables
1,381-unlt-long record 1,381-unlt-Iong record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 72 Part 78
1978 person level, third interview quarter, 1980 person level, first interview quarter,
all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up
to four incidents to four incidents
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
10,061 cases 11,000 cases
935 variables 935 variables
1,381-unlt-long record 1,381-unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 73 Part 80
1978 person level, fourth interview 1980 person level, second interview
quarter, all victims, 10 percent quarter, all victims, 10 percent
non-victims, for up to four incidents non-victims, for up to four incidents
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
10,486 cases 11,325 cases
935 variables 935 variables
1,381-unit-long record 1,381-unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case

Part 74 Part 101


1979 person level, first interview quarter, 1973 full file
&11 victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up hierarchical file structure
to four incidents
rectangular file structure Part 102
9,395 cases 1974 full file
935 variables hierarchical file structure
1,381-unit-long record
1 record per case Part 103
1975 full file
Part 75 hierarchical file structure
1979 person level, second interview
quarter, all victims, 10 percent Part 104
non-victims, for up to four incidents 1976 full file
rectangular file structure hierarchical file structure
10,261 cases
935 variables Part 105
1,381-unit-long record 1977 full file
1 record per case hierarchical file structure

192 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 106 Bureau of JUstice Statistics,
1978 full file U.S. Department of Justice
hierarchical file structure
National crime surveys: National
Part 107 sample, 1979·1987 [revised
1979 full file questionnaire]
hierarchical file structure
(ICPSR 8608)
Part 108
1980 full file Summary: The purpose of the NatIonal Crime
hierarchical file structure Surveys Is to provide data on the level of
crime victimiZation In the United States and to
Part '109 collect data on the charf;lOterlstics of crime in-
1981 full file cidents and victims. Interviews were coo-
hierarchical file structure ducted with aach household member twelve
years of age and older and detailed informa-
Part 110 tion about each household and persooal vic-
1982 full file timization was recorded. The data Include
hierarchical file structure type of crime, description of the offender, se-
verity of crime, injuries or losses, and demo-
Part 111 graphic characteristics of household mem-
Codebook for full file (1973-1976), bers. Class I
incident-level (1973-1982), and
person-Jevel (1973-1978) Universe: All persons in the United States 12
rectangular file structure years of age and older.
82-unit-long record
1 record per case Sampling: Stratified multistage cluster sample.

Part 112 Note: The National Crime Surveys data are


Codebook for full file (1977), incident-level organized by collection quarter and six quar-
(1973-1982), and person-level (1973-1978) ters comprise an annual file. For example, for
rectangular file structure the 1979 file the four quarters of 1979 are in-
84-unit-long record cluded as well as the first two quarters of
1 record per case 1980. The first seven files described below
are hierarchically structured with four levels:
Part 113 the first level, the household ID, has a logical
Codebook for full file (1978), incident-level record length of 54 characters and contains
(1973-1982), and person-level (1973-1978) eight variables. The second lavel, the house-
rectangular file structure hold, has a logical record length of 204 with
82-unlt-long record 89 variables. The third or person level has a
1 record per case logical record length of 142 and 57 variables,
and the final level, the incident level has a
Part 114 logical record length of 481 and 327 vari-
Codebook for full file (1979-1980), ables, The person-level files contain data 00
incident-level (1973-1982), and all victims with a maximum four incidents
person-level (1979-1980) each, and a 10 percent sample of non-vic-
rectangular file structure tims. The unit of analysis is the victim. The
82-unit-long record subset of rape cases includes attempts and
1 record per case completed rapes. Users of the incident-level,
person-level, or rape subsets should refer to
Part 115 the codebook documenting the full files for ap-
Codebook for full file (1981-1982) and propriate codes for each variabie.
incident-Jevel (1973-1982)
rectangular file structure Extent of collection: 29 data files + machine-
82-unlt-long record 1 record per case readable documentation

OSIRIS data format

Victimization 193
Part 1 Part 9
1979 full 1980 Incident
hierarchical file structure rectangular file structure
household level: 191,906 28,713 cases
person level: 351,860 473 variables
Incident level: 41,084 731-unlt-long record
1 record per case
Part 2
1980 full Part 10
hierarchical file structure 1981 incident
household level: 209,882 rectangular file structure
person level: 382,707 28,267 cases
Incld9!1t level: 43,375 473 variables
731-unlt-long record
Part 3 1 record per case
1981 full
hierarchical file structure Part 11
household level: 214,336 1982 incident
person level: 389,524 rectangular file structure
Incident level: 43,959 28,267 cases
473 variables
Part 4 731-unit-long record
1982 full 1 record per case
hierarchical file structure
household level: 216,005 Part 12
person level: 393,685 1983 incident
Incident level: 42,305 rectangular file structure
26,093 cases
Part 5 473 variables
1983 full 731-unit-long record
hierarchical file structure 1 record per case
household level: 217,814
person level: 392,058 Part 13
incident level: 39,056 1984 incidentfile
rectangular file structure
Part 6 20,980 cases
1984 full 473 variables
hierarchical file structure 731-unit-long record
household level: 201,516 1 record per case
person level: 341,790
incident level: 32,352 Part 14
1985 incident
Part 7 rectangular file structure
1985 full 19,171 cases
hierarchical file structure 473 variables
household IEIVel: 178,324 731-unit-long record
person level: 316,094 1 record per case
incident level: 28,564
Part 15
Part 8 Codebook for all datasets
1979 incident rectangular file structure
rectangular file st.-ucture 80-unit-long record
28,207 cases 1 record per case
473 variables
731-unit-long record Part 16
1 record per case 1979-1987 incident-level concatenated file
rectangular file structure
216,417 cases
473 variables
731-unlt·long record
1 record per case

194 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 17 Part 25
1986 full 1983 person
hierarchical file structure rectangular file structure
household level: 175,269 57,514 cases
person level: 306,732 1,454 variables
Incident level: 27,105 2,078·unll·long record
1 record per case
Part 18
1966 incident Part 26
rectangular file structure 1984 person
18,158 cases rectangular file structure
473 variables 48,748 cases
731-unlt-long record 1,454 variables
1 record per case 2,078·unlt·lon9 record
1 record per case
Part 19
1987 full Part 27
hierarchical file structure 1985 person
household level: 167,375 rectangular file structure
person level: 290,935 45,085 cases
IncIdent level: 25,703 1,454 variables
2,078·unlt-long record
Part 20 1 record per case
1987 incident
rectangular file structure Part 28
17,337 cases 1986 person
473 variables rectangular file structure
731-unlt·long record 43,576 cases
1 record per case 1,454 variables
2,078-unlt-long record
Part 21 1 record per case
1979 person
rectangular file structure Part 29
54,677 cases 1987 person
1,454 variables rectangular file structure
2,078-unit-lon9 record 41,386 cases
1 record per case 1,454 variables
2,078-unlt-long record
Part 22 1 record per case
1980 person
rectangular file structure Part 30
57,923 cases All rape cases 1979·1987
1,454 variables 897 cases
2,078-unit-Iong record 473 variables
1 record per case 731-unit-long record
1 record per case
Part 23
1981 person
rectangular file structure
59,078 cases
1,454 variables Bureau of Justice Statlstles,
2,078-unlt-Iong record U.S. Department of Justlee
1 record per case National crime surveys: National
?~·rt24
sample, 1986·1990 [near-term data]
1982 person (ICPSR 8864)
rectangular file structure
58,930 cases Summary: The objective of the National
1,454 variables Crime Surveys Is to provide data on the level
2,078-unit-long record of crime victimization In the United States and
1 record per case to collect data on the characteristics of crime
Incidents and victims. For this survey each re-

Victimization 195
spondent was asked a series of screen ques- Extent of collection: 12 data files + machine-
tions to determine If ho or she was vlctlmlzOO readable documentation
during the six-month period preceding the
first day of the month of the Interview. Screen OSIRIS data format
questions ask about break-Ins or attempts
and stolen household Items, Including motor Part 9
vehicles and motor vehicle parts. The data In- 1986 collection quarter 3 file
clude type of crime, description of the of- hierarcilical file structure
fender, severity of the crime, Injuries or household level: 29,808
losses, and demographic Information on person level: 52,184
household members such as age, sex, race, Incident level: 4,489
education, employment, median family In-
come, marital status, and military history. Part 10
Class I 1986 collection quarter 4 file
hierarchical fila structure
U"Jverse: All persons In th e United States 12 household level: 29,572
years of age and older. person level: 51,762
Incident level: 4,802
Sampling: Stratified multistage cluster sample.
Part 11
Note: The National Crime Surveys data are 1987 full file
organized by collection quarter, with six quar- hierarchical file structure
ters comprising an annual file. For example, household level: 180,409
for the 1987 file the four quarters of 1987 are person level: 314,349
Included as well as the first two quarters of Incident level: 28,176
1988. The first four files described below are
hierarchically structured with four levels. The Part 12
first leVel, the household ID, has a logical re- 1988 full file
cord length of 54 characters and contains five hierarchical file structure
variables. The second level, the household, household level: 180,823
has a logical record length of 189 and 91 vari- person level: 313,196
ables. The third or person level has a logical Incident level: 28,605
record length of 124 and 50 variables (pl3r
person), and the final level, the incident level, Part 13
has a logical record length of 639 and 499 1981 incident file
variables (per Incident). The first eight parts of rectangular file structure
this collection were the original collection 18,964 cases
quarter files from the Census Bureau. These 640 variables
flies are not available for public release. The 856-unlt-long record
processed files made available for public re- 1 record per case
lease begin with Part 9. The person-level ex-
tract files are structured as annual rectangular Part 14
files, one file for each year-1987, 1988, and 1988 incident file
1989. Only incidents within the calendar y6<"J rectangular fils structure
have been Included, up to a maXimum of four 19,145 cases
Incidents per person. A 10 percent random 640 variables
sample of all peopla without incidents has 856-unIHong record
also been Included. People without Incidents 1 record per case
have also been bound by calendar year.
Each case or person contains all household, Part 15
person, and Incident variables from the full hi- Incident-level concatenated file
erarchical files or variables 2001-2091, 3001- rectangular file structure
3050, and 4001-4499. Variables 5001-5499, 56,442 cases
6001-6499, and 7001-7499 represent the sec- 640 variables
ond, third, and fourth occurrence of incidents. 856-unlt-long record
For respondents with fewer than four Inci- 1 record per case
dents, the Incident record variables contain
missing data codes. Users working with the Part 16
person- or Incident-level national crime surveys Codebook-listed-to-tapa for all parts
files should refer 10 the codebook documenting rectangular file structure
the full hierarchical file for methodological infor- 80-unit-long record
mation am appropriate code values. 1 record per case

196 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 17 Note: This collection 01 rape cases was take\'\
1987 person file trom the National Crime Survey: National
rectangular file structure Sam pic, 1973·1983 (ICPSR 7635). The defi-
35,650 cases nition of rape In the National Crime SUrVey In·
2,137 variables cludes attempts that Involve a verbal threat of
2,Sn-unlt-long record rape only.
1 record per case
Extent of collection: 2 data flies + machine-
Part 18 readable documentation + SPSS control
1988 person file cards
rectangular file structure
35,971 cases OSIRIS data format with SPSS control cards
2,137 variables
2,Sn-unlt-long record Part 1
1 record per case Victims file
rectangular file structure
Part 23 1,236 cases
1989 full file 342 variables
hierarchical file structure 559-unlt-long record
household level: 174,303 1 record per case
person level: 301,404
Incident level: 27,472 Part 2
Non-victims and othcr victims file
Part 24 rectangular file structure
1989 Incident file 2,523 cases
rectangular file structure 929 variables
18,333 cases 1,391-unlt-long record
640 variables 1 record per case
856-unlt-long record
1 record per case Related Publication:
Bureau of Justice Statistics
Part 25 The crime of rape. Washington, D.C,: Bu-
person file reau of Justice Statistics, 1985,
rectangular file structure
34,298 cases
2,137 variables
2,Sn-unlt-long record
1 record per case
Bureau of JUstice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice
National crime surveys: Redesign
data, 1975-1979
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice (lCPSR8484)

National crime surveys: National Summary: These data are a product of the
sample of rape victims, 1973·1~IB2 National Crime Surveys Redesign Project.
The purpose of the data collection was to cre-
(ICPSR 8625) ate several different data files from existing
public-use National Crime Surveys files. For
Summary: The purpose of this stUdy was to each crime, information is gathered on the vic-
provide an In depth look at rapes and at- tim's housing unit and housl:!hold as well as
tempted rapes in the United States. The col- the incident itself. A personal history and Inter-
lection contains variables regarding the char- view are also included. Several data files con-
acteristics of the crime, such as the setting, tain National Crime Survey and Uniform
the relationship between the victim and 01- Crime Report data on the following Index
fender, the likelihood of Injury, and the reasons crimes: robbery, larceny-theft, burglary, motor
why rape is not reported to police. Class 11\ vehicle theft, rape, and aggravated assault.
Class IV
Universe; All persons In the United States.
Universe: All persons In the United States.
Sampling; A stratified mLitistade cluster sample.
Sampling: Stratiffed multistage cluster sample.

Victimization 197
Note: The victimization files were originally Part 6
part of the National crime survey: National Incident level, longitudinal file, part 2
sample (ICPSR 7635). The full longitudinal rectangular file structure
files and the longitudinal reference period re- 81,475 cases
search file each have five levels. The first 625 variables
level, the housing unit, has approximately 1,499-unlt-long record
40,000 cases. The second level, the house- 1 record per case
hold Intervie.v, has approximately 50,000
cases. The third level, the person interview Part 7
history has approximately 110,000 cases. Research referenco period file
The fourth level, the person Interview, has ap- hierarchical file structure
proximately 350,000 cases, and the fifth level,
the Incident Information, has approximately Part 8
42,000 cases. The first level of the longitudi- All index crimes file
nal full file has approximately 60 variables rectangular file structure
and a logical record length of 150. The sec- 70 cases
ond level has 350 variables and a logical re- 45 variables
cord length of 827. The third level has 100 315-unlt-long record
variables and a logical record length of 222. 1 record per case
The fourth levc~ has 44 variables and a logical
record length of 106, and the fifth level has Part 9
190 variables and a logical record length of BurglDry data file
314. The first level research reference year rectangular file structure
file has 70 variables and a logical record 70 cases
length of 160. The second level has 470 vari- 14 variables
ables and a logical record length of 900. The 60·unit-long record
third level has 115 variables and a logical re- 1 record per case
cord length of 240. The fourth level has 44
variables and a logical record length of 106, Part 10
and the fifth le·o/el has 190 variables and a logi- Change scene data file
cal record length of 314. rectangular file structure
60 cases
Extent of collection: 10 data files + machine- 15 variables
readable documentation 65-unlt-long record
1 record per case
Logical record length data format

Part 1
Longitudinal file, part 1
hierarchical file structure
Bureau of Justice Statis1ics,
U.S. Department of Justice
Part 2 National crime surveys: Reverse
Longitudinal file, part 2
hierarchical file structure record check studies: Washington,
D.C., San Jose, and Baltimore,
Part 3 1970-1971
Longitudinal file, part 3
hierarchical file structure (ICPSR 8693)

Part 4 Summary: These surveys were part of a se-


Longitudinal file, part 4 ries of pretests conducted during the early
hierarchical file structure 1970s to reveal problems associated with do-
ing a nationwide study on victimization. They
PartS were done to determine the most effective ref-
Incident level, longitudinal file, part 1 erence period to use when questioning re-
rectangular file structure spondents in order to gain the fullest and
88,875 cases most reliable informatiof', ~o measure the de-
620 variables gree to which respondents move incidents oc-
1,499-unit-long record curring outside the reference period into that
1 record per case period when questioned, and to explore the
possibility of identifying incidents by a few
broad general questions as opposed to a se-

198 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


rles of more specific probing questions. data on nonlntervlowed and Interviewed per-
Class IV sons reporting household victimizations. The
Supplement was administered in February,
Universe: Part 1: All crime victims In &tn 1984 for a one-month period in place of t'1e
Jose during 1970. Part 2: All crime victims In National Crime Survej. The purpose of the
Baltimore In 1970. Part 3: All crime victims In Supplement was to collect data on people's
Washington D.C. In 1970. life-styles in order to determine vmelher cartaln
life-styles are related to crime victimization.
Sampling: Part 1: A probability sample of per-
sonal victims of crimes was selected from offi- The Victim Risk Supplement Is based on five
cial police reports. Victims were chosen to questionnaires used by the Census Bureau
provide uniform representation over 12 for data collection. The first and second ques-
months on robbery, burglay, rape, assault, tionnaires, VRS-1 and VRS-2, contain basic
and larceny. Part 2: 500 victims were Identi- screen questions and an Incident report, re-
fied from official police records and repre- spectively. VRS-3, the third questionnaire,
sented four crimes: assault, robbery,larceny, was completed for every household member
and burglay, from five recall time periods. age 12 or older, and It Includes questions
Part 3: 600 victims were identified from official specifically designed to determine vmether a
police records and represented four crimes: person's life-style at work, home, or during lal-
assault, robbery, larceny, and burglary. sure time affects the risk of crime victimiza-
tion. The Interviewers completed the fourth
Extent of collection: 3 data files and fifth questionnaires, VRS-4 and VRS-5;
they Were Instructed to answer questions
logical record length data forenat about the respondents' neighborhoods and
behavior during the interview.
Part 1
San Jose pilot study The Victim Risk Suppiement Is a hierarchi-
hierarchical file structure cally structured data collection. There are 791
395 cases variables and the logical record length of the
450 variables data is 481 characters. There are 14,258
9,236·unit-lon9 record households, 25,238 person records, and
1 record per case 2,952 incidences of crime. The VRS-3 ques-
tionnaire was completed for 25,138 respon-
Part 2 dents; the VRS-4 for 11,700; and the VRS-5
Baltimore study for 22,990. Class II
hierarchical file structure
360 cases Note: The dataset is hierarchical, containing
450 variables three levels of information within one file.
1,54O-unit-long record These three levels of data can be used Jointly
1 record per case or Independently of each other and are made
up of the following types of information: data
Part 3 on the household, data on the persons in that
Washington, D.C. study household, and data on the criminal victim-
hierarchical file structure i7.ations experienced by members in that
326 cases household. The hierarchical file has 42,448 re-
450 variables cords which are broken up as follows: 14,258
1,030-unit-long record household level records, 25,238 person level
1 record per case records I and 2,952 victimization records. The
logical record length of the household level
portion of the data file is 252. The person
level record length Is 323, and the victimiza-
tion level is 470. The data file is variably
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
blocked. There Is also a fixed block tile. Its
U.S. Department of Justice contents and structure are identical to the vari-
National crime surveys: Victim risk able blocked data file except that the record
lengths of the 3 levels of data have a uniform
supplement, 1983 length of 470. The fixed block hierarchical
(lCPSR 8316) data file exists for users whose computing fa-
cilities cannot handle variable blocked data
Summary: This special one-time survey was
conducted in conjunction with the larger Na- Extent of collection: 1 data file + 1 codebook
tional Crime Survey and designed to collect dictionary

Victimization 199
OSIRIS data format Related Publication:
Archer, Dane, and Rosemary Gartner
hierarchical file structure Violence and crime in a cross-national per-
725 variables spective. New Haven, CT: Yale University
1 record per case Press, 19B4.

Archer, Dane and Rosemary Gartner Cook, Royer, Barbara Sm~h, and Adele
Harrell
Violence and crime In cross-national
perspective, 1900-1972 Helping crime victims: Levels of
(ICPSR 8612)
trauma and effectiveness of services
in Arizona, 1983·1984
Slimmary: The purpose of this data collection (ICPSR 9329)
was to provide comparative, cross-national,
longitudinal data on rates of violent and non- This study was sponsored by the United States
violent crimes for every country In the world Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
over a period of 72 years. The study was de- tice. The grant number Is 82-IJ-CX-K036.
signed to supply both comparative breadth
and historical depth. Information is Included Summary: This dAta collection was designed
on murder, rape, robbery, assault, and thefts. to gauge the Impact of a victim assistance
Class IV program on the) behavior and attitudes of vic-
tims and to 0V,'aluate the program as as-
Universe: All countries in the world. sessed by p(1l/ce and prosecutors. Program
Impuct WOi~ ~~tifl1atad by examining the
Note: The machine-readable documentation change In psycftolog)cal, social, and financial
Includes two FORTRAN command filas whloh e:ondltlol'1s of tha vletm1~ following the service
can be used in conjunction with tha data files Intervention. Three types of victim service
to output crime rates atld raw crime figures conditions were compared: crisis intervention
for each country. The only documentation pro- service, delayed assistance service, and no
vided for these files Is the comment state- service. The victim files contain information
ments Included In the files. on the victim's demographic characteristics,
various kinds of psychological indicators and
Restrictions: Users are asked to send copies stress symptoms following the incident, re-
of articles based on the data to: Dane Archer, spondent's assessments of impacts of victimi-
Stevenson College, Univ. of Calif., Santa zation on social activity, family, job, and finan-
Cruz, CA 95064 (408) 429-2555 or cial conditions. The follow-up files have
(408) 426-1186. information on the victims' financial and emo-
tional state some time after the incident. The
Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine- police files include respondent's personal
readable documentation background, types and frequency of victim-
witness services used, and opinions about
Card image data format contacts with police. The prosecutor files in-
clude variables relating to personal back-
Part 1 ground and satisfaction with the court system.
Crime file Class IV
rectangular file structure
4,568 cases Universe: Victims of the crimes of sexual as-
12 variables sault, domestic assault, other assault, robbery,
BO-unit-Iong record and burglary in Tucson, Arizona during 1983.
1 record per case
Sampling: The sample of 323 victims of sex-
Part 2 ual assault, domestic assault, other assault,
Eight crime file robbery, and burglary consists of two major
rectangUlar file structure groups. For the first group 223 victims were
3,520 cases selected from victim assistance program re-
11 variables cords (109 had received immediate crisis in-
BO-unit-Iong record tervention services and 114 had received de-
1 record per case layed services from the program). A matched

200 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


control group of 100 victims who had re- Writz, P. and A. Harrell
ceived no program services also was se- "Victim and crime characteristics, coping
lected. The sample of 148 police officers was response, and short and long-term recov-
drawn randomly, stratified by "team" (ihe four ery from victimization." Journal of Consult-
teams were located In the four geographical Ing and Clinical Psychology 55 (1987),
quadrants of the city). The survey of 36 dep- 866·871.
uty county attorneys represented a sample of
all prosecutors in the city with the exception
of two prosecutors used for the pretest and
three who did not return their questionnalres. Davis, Robert C.
Extent of collection: 26 data files Providing help to victims: A study of
psychological and material outcomes
Card Image data format In New York City, 1984-1985
Part 1: Victim, initial interview data. (ICPSR 9479)
Part 2: Victim background
Part 3: Victim feelings This study was sponsored by lhe United States
Part 4: Victim stress Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
Part 5: Victim social life and family tice. The grant number is 83-IJ-CX-0044.
Part 6: Victim reactions file 1
Part 7: Victim reactions file 2 Summary: This data collection was designed
Part 8: Victim finances to examine the effectiveness of a New York
Part 9: Victim assistance City agency's attempt to decrease the nega-
Part 10: Victim crisis tive emotions that result from victimization.
Part 11: Victim direction The data address the following questions: (1)
Part 12: Victim criminal justice To what extent do specific treatments mitigate
Part 13: Victim follow-up the negative psychological impact of victimiza-
Part 14: Victim follow-up feelings tion? (2) Ive individuals from a particular
Part 15: Victim follow-up stress demographic group more prone to suffer from
Part 16: Victim social life and family psychological adjustment problems following
follow-up victimization? (3) When victimized, do indi-
Part 17: Victim reactions 1 follow-up viduals blame themselves or the situation? (4)
Part 18: Victim reactions 2 follow-up Ive some crimes more difficult to cope with
Part 19: Victim finance follow-up than others? (5) Does previous victimization
Part 20: Victim assistance follow-up affect the likelihood that an individual will
Part 21 : Police data file 1 have difficulty coping with current as well as
Part 22: Police data file 2 future victimization? Data were collected in
Part 23: Police data file 3 two waves, with Wave 1 interviews completed
Part 24: Prosecutor data file 1 within one month of the victimization incident
Part 25: Prosecutor data file 2 and Wave 2 interviews completed three
Part 26: Prosecutor data file 3 months after treatment. The effects of three
treatments were measured. They included:
rectangular fila structure traditional crisis counseling (which Incorpo-
35 to 323 cases per part rates psychological and material assistance
7 to 36 variables per part such as food, shelter, cash, etc.), cognitive reo
80-unit-long record structuring (challenges to "irrational" beliefs
1 record per case about the world and one's self used In con-
junction with crisis counseling), and material
Related Publication!!: assistance only (no psychological aid pro-
Cook, R., B. Smith, and A. Harrell vided). A fourth group of victims received no
"Helolng crime victims: Level of trauma treatment or services. Three standardized
and 'effectiveness of service" (executive psychometric scales were used in the study.
summary). Washington, DC: Nationallnsti- In addition to these standardized scales, the
Me of Justice, 1987. initial assessment battery included an index
Smith, 8., R. Cook, and A. Harrell of fear of crime as well as an index that meas-
"Evaluation of victim service" (final report). ured behavior adjustment. Another set of
Washington, DC: National Institute of Jus- measures assessed how victims perceived
tice, 1986. their experience of victimization and included
items on self.blame, selective evaluation, and
control. Also included were questions about
the crime and precautions taken to guard

Victimization 201
agalnst future victimization. The follow-up as- age, housebreaking, violence, robberies, as-
sessment battery was virtually Identical to the saults, and attempts. Victim-offender relation-
Initial battery, except that questions about ships, crime prevention techniques, and po-
services and social support received by the lice contact variables are also provided.
victim were added. The following demo- Household demographic variables Include
graphic variables are Included In the data: employment, education, Income, Insurance,
sex, age, marital status, education, Income, and city size. Class IV
and race. The unit of analysis was the individ-
ual. Class IV Extent of collection: 4 data files + machlne-
readable documentation + SPSS Control
Universe: Victims of crime In New York City Cards
during 1984 and 1985.
logical record length data format
Extent of collection: 2 data files + SPSS Con-
trol Cards Part 1
1988 data, sample 2,000
logical record length data format with SPSS rectangular file structure
control cards 2,000 cases
247 variables
Part 1 328-unit-long record
Wave I interview data 1 record per case
rectangular file structure
272 cases Part 2
136 variables Data list 1988, sample 2,000
303-unlt-long record 80-unit-long record
1 record per case
Part 3
Part 2 Variable list 1988, sample 2,000
Wave II interview data 132-unit-long record
rectangular file structure
196 cases Part 4
110 variables 1988 data, sample 28,006
259-unit-long record rectangular file structure
1 record per case 28,006 cases
280 variables
Related Publication: 372-unit-long record
Davis, Robert C. 1 record per case
·Providing help to victims: A study of psy-
chological and material outcomes: Execu- Part 5
tive summary." New York, NY: Victim Serv- Data list 1988, sample 28,006
Ices Agency, 1987. 80-unit-long record

Part 6
Variable list 1988, sample 28,006
Dutch Ministry of Justice 132-unit-long record

International victimization survey, 1988 Part 7


1988 data, sample 500
(ICPSR 9421) rectangular file structure
500 cases
Summary: This data collection Is the longest 246 variables
ongoing series of national surveys conducted 326-unit-long record
by the Dutch Ministry of Justice. The data are 1 record pel' case
collected by the Central Bureau of Statistics
for the Ministry of Justice and include vari- Part 8
ables such as total number of crime experi- Data list 1988, sample 500
ences, number of persons in the household, 80-unit-long record
sex of the respondent, and number of respon-
dents in the home 16 years of age and older Part 9
as well as under 16. Crimes covered include Variable list 1988, sample 500
motor vehicle theft and damage, motor bicy- 132-unit-long record
cle theft and damage, bicycle theft and dam-

202 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 10 rectangular file structure
Data list 1988, weight 500 6,002 cases
eO-unit-long record 608 variables
394-unlt-long record
Part 11 1 record per case
Weight data 1988, sample 500
rectangular fila structure Related Publications:
500 cases Gelles, Richard J., and Murray A. Straus
6 variables Intimate violence. New York, NY: Simon
41-unit-long record and Schuster, 1988.
1 record per case Straus, Murray A. and Richard J. Gelles
Physical violence In American families:
Risk factors and adaptations to violence in
8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Trans-
action Books, 1989.
Gelles, Richard J. and Murray A. Straus
Physical violence In American
families, 1985
Gibbs, John J. and Peggy L Shelly
(ICPSR 9211)
Port Authority cargo theft data of New
Summary: Data were collected In this follow- Jersey and New York, 1978-1980
up survey to compare estimates of the Inci-
dence of Intiafamlly physical violence with es- (ICPSR 8089)
timates obtained In an earlier surve,',
Physical violence in American families, This study was sponsored by the United States
1976 (ICPSR 7733). The main component of Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
this survey design was a national cross-sec- tice. The grant number Is 8O-IJ-CX-OOOO.
tional survey of adults in the United States
who either (1) were currently married or living Summary: This criminal justice data collection
together, (2) were single parents with children was prepared by the Commercial Theft Stud-
under 18 in the household, or (3) had been ies division of the Causes of Crime for Gain
married or living with a partner of the opposite as one of three data bases established to
sex within the past two years. Approximately study patterns of commercial theft and char-
two-thirds of American households met one acteristics of commercial thieves. Created to
of these three qualifications at the time of the study methods used to commit thefts involv-
surve,'. Another objective of the survey was to Ing cargo, these data include incident and
generate comparisons of the incidence of in- missing cargo characteristics, suspect charac-
trafamily physical violence by race and ethnlc- teristics and punishments, and type and value
lty. Variables in this data collection Include the of stolen property.
number of couples, single parents, and chil-
dren In the household, respondent's race, eth- Cargo thefts which occurred at John F.
nlcity, sex, age, and marital status, number of Kennedy International Airport, laGuardia Air-
persons In the household previously married, port, Newark International Airport, and the
years lived in the community, and employ- New York Marine Terminals at Brooklyn, Port
menVoccupation Information. Class IV Elizabeth, and Port Newark were included In
the data which were collected from the Crime
Universe: Adults and children under 18 in Analysis Unit files of the Port Authority of New
American families. York and New Jerse,'.
Sampling: The Initial stage of sample con- This data collection consists of a printed code-
struction required the development of a na- book and one data file. The 864 incidents and
tional area probability sample b~ed upon the 126 variables are available In card-Image for-
distribution of the roult population of the United mat with three decks per case. Class IV
States. Non-Hispcnic blooks, Hispanic blooks,
and non-blook Hispanics were oversampled.
Extent of collection: 1 data file

Logical record length data format

Victimization 203
Gibbs, John J. and Peggy L Shelly These data were collected from the files of
the Xenon, New Jersey, Police Department.
SLATS truck theft data of New York
City, 1976-1980 The collection consists of one data file con-
taining 218 incidents and 37 variables. A
(lCPSR 8090) printed codebook documents these data
which are available In card-Image format with
This study was sponsored by the United States one deck per Incident. Class IV
Depcvtment of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grCW'lt number Is 8O-IJ-CX-OOOO.

Summary: Created by the Commercial Theft


Studies component of the Study of the Groves, Robert M.
Causes of Crime for Gain, this is one of three
quantitative data bases which study patterns National crime surveys redesign data:
of commercial theft and characteristics of Peoria record check study
commercial thieves. This Criminal Justice (ICPSR 8669)
data collection was created to examine the
methods used to commit various acts of theft Summary: The purpose of this study was to
which involved a truck or a portion of a truck measure criminal activity In the United States
(I.e., its contents). The variables in the collec- based on survey reports of crime victims. In
tion include incident characteristics, types of the study two different questionnaire forms
crime involved, type and value of stolen prop- were used in order to assess which provided
erty weapon involvement, treatment of driver better responses. One form was very lengthy
and' helper, suspect characteristics, and re- and asked detailed questions about each
covery information. household, person, and incident. The second
form was much shorter and asked very gener-
These data were collected from the files of a alized questions. The datcl collection was an
specialized New York Police Department de- attempt to find alternative methods of sam-
tective squad, which was created specifically pling, interviewing, designl~g questionnaires,
to Investigate commercial truck thefts. managing data, and reporting results. De-
tailed information is provided on household
This collection consists of one data file con- characteristics and other characteristics of the
taining 601 incidents and 93 variables. A respondents, as well as on crime incidents, in-
printeo codebook documents these data cluding burglary, vandalism, assault, and
which are aVailable in card-Image format with rape. Ciass IV
two decks of data per case. Class IV
Universe: All persons in the United States 12
years of age and older.

Gibbs, John J. and Peggy L Shelly Sampling: Combination of sample from police
record system and random digit dialed sample.
Xenon (New Jersey) commercial
burglary data, 1979-1981 Note: For reasons of confidentiality the
ICPSR has masked several variables.
(ICPSR 8088)
Extent of collection: 6 data files
This study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- Logical record length data format
tice. The grant number is 8O-IJ-CX-OOOO.
Part 1
Summary: One of three quantitative data Record check 1, person-level data
bases comprising the Commercial Theft Stud- rectangular file structure
ies component of the Study of the Causes of 2,077 cases
Crime for Gain, this criminal justice data col- approximately 2,322 variables
lection contains information on commercial 3,447-unit-long record
burglary incidents in a specific geographic 1 record per case
area. The data collection includes Incident
characteristics, theft item, value of stolen
property and suspect characteristics, e.g., po-
lice contacts, number of arrests, sex, race,
and age.

204 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Part 2 zation, involvement in case processing, use
Record check 1, incident-level data of victim assistance service, satisfaction with
rectangular file structure case outcomes, and opinions about the court
2,675 cases system. The police file Information Includes
approximately 162 variabl es personal background. screening recommen-
240-unlt-long record dations on scenario cases, communications
1 record per case with victims, and opinions about the role of
victims in the criminal justice system. The
Part 3 prosecutor file contains variables on personal
Record check 2, screener data background, screening decisions on the sce-
rectangular file structure nario cases, sentencing recommendations on
1,097 cases the scenarios, contacts with victims, and opin-
approximately 378 variables ions about the role of victims in the criminal
703-unit-long record justice system. Data are suppUed In the judge
1 record per case file on personal background, sentencing rec-
ommendations on the scenario cases, com-
Part 4 munications with Victims, sources of Informa-
Record check 2, incident-level data tion regarding victim harm, and opinions
rectangular file structure about the role of victims In the criminal justice
1,332 cases system. Class IV
326 variables
388-unit-long record Universe: Population of victims and criminal
1 record per case Justice officials In the United States.
PartS Sampling: Eight sites were selected to repre-
National sample, current data sent regional variation In population size and
rectangular file structure types of victim services offered. The victim
654 cases sample was a systematic sample selected
approximately 405 variables from 1981 prosecutor files. Every tenth case
816-unit-long record up to 150 cases were taken from each site.
1 record per case Responses from criminal justice officials were
obtained through convenience samples of po-
Part 6 lice officers, prosecutors, and judges all of
National sample, experimental data whom were experienced with the five target
rectangular file structure oHenses.
767 cases
approximately 432 variables Extent of collection: 4 data files
907-unit-long record
1 record per case Logical record length data format

Part 1
Victim file
Hernon, Jolene C. and Brian Forst rectangular file structure
392 cases
Criminal justice response to victim 67 variables
harm In the United States, 1981 268-unlt-long record
1 record per case
(ICPSR 8249)
Part 2
This study was sponsored by the United States Police file
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- rectangular file structure
tice. The grant number is 82-IJ-CX-0009. 111 cases
66 variables
Summary: This data collection examines the 317-unit-long record
effects of victim harm on decisions regarding 1 record per case
arrest, prosecution, and sentencing and the
effect of these decisions on the victim's per-
ception of the criminal justice system. Five
types of offenses were studied; homicide, sex-
ual assault, burglary, robbery, and aggravated
assault. The victim file contains information
on personal characteristics, results of victimi-

Victimization 205
Part 3 Sampling: Multistage probability sample using
Prosecutor file electoral registers as the frame.
rectangular file structure
101 cases Note: This collection offers three distinct rep-
73 variables resentations of British Crime Survey data
380-unlt-long record They are Parts 1-3, Part 4, and Part 5. Part 1
1 record per case consists of data captured on the Main Ques-
tionnaire. Pan 2 represents data from the Vic-
Part 4 tim Form. Part 3 consists of data collected via
Judge file the Follow up Questionnaire. Parts 1-3 are
rectangular file structure documented with SPSS Control Cards and
48 cases the nonnumeric codes "-1" and "-2" are used
52 variables to represent missing data Part 4 Is a hierar-
278-unit-long record chically structured file consisting of 5 cards
1 record per case per respondent containing data from the Main
Questionnaire (approximately 188 variables),
Related Publication: followed by 5 cards per Victim Form (approxi-
Hernon, Jolene C., and Brian Forst mately 290 variables) for up to four Victim
"The criminal Justice response to victim Forms per respondent, followed by 5 carcls
harm." Washington, DC: National Institute containing data from the Follow up Question-
of Justice, 1984. naire (approximately 230 variables). Only re-
spondents reporting incidents of victimization
have Victim Forms. The Follow-up Question-
naire was administered to all respondents re-
porting Incidents of victimization arId to two in
Home Office Research and Planning Un~ five other respondents. Part 5 is identical to
British crime sUlVay, 1982 Part 4 except that it has been "padded" by in-
serting blank cards so that there are thirty 80-
(lCPSR 8672) column cards for each respondent. The code-
book describes Parts 4 and 5 only. Hardcopy
Summary: The primary purpose of the British documentation describes interviews with
Crlma Survey was to estimate how many of 5,031 people in Scotland, however, data for
the public In England and Wales are victims Scotland are not included In this dataset.
of selected types of crime over a year, de-
scribing the circumstances under which peo-
ple become victims, and the consequences of
crime for victims. Other aims included provid-
Ing background Information on fear of crime Home Office Research and Planning Untt
among the public and on public contact with British crime surveys, 1984
the police. Respondents were asked a series
of screening questions to establish whether (ICPSR 8685)
or not they or their households had been vic-
tims of relevant crimes during the one-year Summary: In 1982 the Home Office con-
reference period. They were then asked a se- ducted the first British Crime Survey, a major
ries of very detailed questions about the Inci- study with the aim of discovering levels of vic-
dents they reported. Basic descriptive back- timization in Britain, and of producing attitudi-
ground Information on respondents and their nal data on issues relating to crime. The sur-
households was collected to allow analysis of vey was repeated in 1984 and was restricted
the sorts of people who do and do not be- to England and Wales whereas the previous
come victims. Information was also collected study had included Scotland. The survey set
on other areas which were of Intrinsic interest out to replicate the previous one as far as pos-
and which could usefully be related to experi- sible. Other than questions having to do with
ence as a victim, namely, fear of crime, con- victimization and basic demographic details,
tact with the police, lifestyle, and self-reported the topics covered in the questionnaire were:
offending. Class IV general opinion of the local area, fear of crime
and precautions taken, likelihood of crime oc-
Universe: People aged 16 and over living in curring, extent of "incivliities" in the area, seri-
private households in England and Wales ousness of various crimes, attitudes towards
and whose addresses appear In the electoral punishment and prison reform, victim support
registers. schemes, neighborhood watch schemes, and
self-reported offending. Class IV

206 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Universe: In England and Wales, people age victim and non-victim file has 108,245 cases
16 and ov~, living in private accommodations. each with a length of 530 characters. Class II
Sampling: Stratified sample based on
residency.
Extent of collection: 1 data file Pate, Anthony M. and Sampson O. Annan
RedUcing fear of crime: Program
Card Image data format evaluation survey In Newark and
rectangular file structure Houston, 1983-1984
11,030 cases (ICPSR 8496)
188 variables
80-unit-long record ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
16 records per case Department of Justice, Nallonal Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number is 8O-IJ-CX-3003.

Summary: Seven neighborhoods In Houston,


Innes, Christopher A. Texas and Newark, New Jersey were sur-
veyed In order to determine the extent of vic-
National crime surveys extract: timization experience and crime prevention
Personal crime longitudinal flies, activities In these areas. The study also as-
~976-1982: Assault victim experiences sessed citizen attitudes toward the police.
Baseline data were collected to determine the
(lCPSR 8315) current citizen perceptions of crime, crime-
avoidance behavior, and citizen satisfaction
National crime surveys extract: with the quality of life In the neighborhoods. In
Personal crime longitudinal flies, addition, experiments were conducted to
1976-1982: Victim and non-victim evaluate the effectiveness of special police
programs designed to reduce the fear of
responses
crime within communities. Class IV
(ICPSR 8315)
Universe: Parts 1, 2, 5, and 6: Residents from
The National Crime Survey (NCS) collects neighborhoods In Newark and Houston. Parts
data on personal and household victimization 3, and 4: Non-residential establishments In
through an ongoing national survey of house- Newark and Houston.
holds and household members. Data collec-
tion was sponsored by the U.S. Department Sampling: Parts 1 and 6: Random sample of
of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). households. Part 2: Follow-up Interviews from
The National Crime Survey program was the same respondents who completed sur-
originally intended to achieve four primary ob- veys in the pre-Intervention stage, and first-
jectives: to develop detailed information about time respondents from households In the pre-
victims and consequences of crime, to esti- intervention sample who did not complete the
mate the numbers and types of crimes not re- first survfJj. Parts 3 and 4: Random sample of
ported to police, to provide uniform measures non-residential establishments. Part 5: Ran-
of selected types of crimes, and to permit dom sample of victims.
comparisons over time and types of areas.
Only data for robbery and assaults are in- Extent of collection: 6 data files
cluded in this dataset. Items included are time
and place of occurrence; injuries suffered; Card image dati:\ format
medical expenses incurred; number, age,
race, and sex of offender(s); relationship of of- Part 1
fender(s) to victim; marital status, employ- Pre-intervention surveys of residential
ment, military experience, and residency. neighborhoods
rectangular file structure
There are two data files contained In two 3,014 cases
separate codebooks; one contains data on as- 434 variables
sault victims and the other contains data for 80-unit-long record
both victims and non- victims. The assault vic- 7 records per case
tim file has 5,846 records, each of which has
a logical record length of 914 characters; the

Victimization 207
Part 2 Ity of life In the District. Also studied was the
Post-intervention surveys in residential degree to which Congressional employees
neighborhoods working In the Capitol Hill area were subject
rectangular file structure to victimization and the extent to which victimi-
3,079 cases zation and the fear caused by it affected their
343 variables productivity.
SO-unlt-Iong record
5 records per case This data collection contalns six files, three of
which are data files. The first file contalns per-
Part 3 son-level data such as residential mobility,
Pre-Intervention surveys of crime provention efforts, and soclodemo-
non-residential establishments graphic characteristics. This file includes
rectangular file structure 5,542 cases with one record per respondent
293 cases and has a logical record length of 334. The
205 variables crime data file, called the "In Scope Crimes
sO-un it-long record File,· contains 1,950 records. Each record in
5 records per case this file represents a reported criminal victimi-
zation, and the file's logical record length Is
Part 4 531. The third file, the "Out of Scope File,·
Post-intervention surveys of has 2,525 cases. An out of scope crime was
non-residential establishments defined as one which was either outside the
rectangular file structure analysis time period of May 1, 19S2 to April
299 cases 30, 1983 or not a crime of interest for this
195 variables study. The logical record length of this file Is
BO-unit-Iong record 150. The three remaining files In this collec-
5 records per case tion are machine-readable codebook files
with logical recl')rd lengths of 133 characters.
PartS Class IV
Follow-up study of victims from Hous~on,
Texas
rectangular file structure
485 cases
224 variables Schreiber, Jan E.
BO-unit-Iong record Inmate victimization in state prisons in
6 records per case the United States, 1979
Part 6 (lCPSR S087)
Questionnaire newsletter
rectangular file structure This data collection was designed to deter-
B19 cases mine the nature and extent of victimization in
633 variables state prisons across the nation. In particular, it
BO-unlt-Iong record examines such quantitative areas as prison
11 records per case living conditions, prison programs, prison
safety, and Inmates' victimization of (or by)
other inmates in several types of property and
bodily crimes. In addition, it contalns a set of
Research Triangle Instttute attitudinal measures dealing with Inmates'
thoughts and perceptions on a variety of sub-
CrimInal victImIzation of DIstrict of jects including their reactions to general state-
Columbia residents and Capitol Hili ments about prison life and to a series of hy-
employees, 1982-1983 pothetical and potentially provocative
situations.
(ICPSR B22B)
Data are aVallable in both OSIRIS and card-
This victimization study of District of Columbia image formats, with machine-readable docu-
residents and Capitol Hill employees was con- mentation. The data file contalns 339 vari-
ducted between May 1982 and April 1983. ables for each of the 487 cases and has a
The data collection was sponsored by the logical record length of 545 characters.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Class II
Statistics (BJS). The primary objective was to
measure the extent of crime In the District of
Columbia and the Impact of crime on the qual-

208 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Skogen, Wesley G., Robert O. Davis, and Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
Arthur J. Lurlglo readable documentation

Victims' needs and victim services, Card Image data format


19~1989: Evanston, Rochester, Pima
Cnunty, and Fayette County rectangular fila structure
470 cases
(lCPSR 9399) 222 variables
80-unlt-long record
ilis study was sponsored by the United States 7 records per case
DepMment of Justice, National Instltute of Jus-
tice. The grcnt number is 88-IJ-CX-0047.

Summary: This data collection examines the Straus, Murray A. and Richard J. Gelles
needs of burglary, rObbery, and assault vic-
tims and the responses of local victim assis- Physical violence In Amorlcan
tance programs to those needs in four metro- families, 1~76
politan areas: Evanston, Ullnols, Rochester,
New York, Pima County, Arizona, and Fayette (ICPSR 7733)
County, Kentucky. Four issues were explored
in detail: the needs of victims, where they This study was conducted In 1976 at the Uni-
seek help, the kinds of help they receive, and versity of New Hampshire with funding pro-
which of their problems do and do not get reo vided by a grant from NIMH. :2,143 respon-
solved. Variables Include (1) demographic In- dents were Interviewed In a nationwide
formation such as clty of residence, length of sample - 960 males and 1,183 females. In-
ret:ldence, birth date, marital status, race, terviews were conducted by Hesponse Analy-
work status, education, and income, (2) infor- sis, Inc. The purpose of the study was to as-
mation on the crime itself, such as type of certaln methods of contllct resolution within
crime, when the crime happened, and details the family. Information was gathered regard-
of the attack and attacker, and (3) conse- ing the following areas: resolution of conflicts
quences of the crime, such as problems en- between spouees and between parents and
countered as a result of the crime, emotional children, InclUding detailed Information on the
responses to the crime, and reactions to the development of conflicts resulting In violence;
crime on a practical level. Class IV resolution of conflicts In respondent's child-
hood family; family power structure; marital
Universe: All burgla'Y, robbery, and assault closeness and stability; and personality and
victims In Evanston, illinoiS, Rochester, New stress factors. The file consists of approxi-
York, Pima County, Arizona, and Fayette mately 481 varlables and 450 derived meas-
County, Kentucky. ures for each respondent. Class II
Sampling: Proportional stratified sample
based on type of victims-fobbery, assaUlt,
and burgiat)'.

Victimization 209
Index of principal investigators

A Cartel', Charlotte A. . . . , . . . . . . . 185


CBS News ••••.•••••.•••• 4-7
ABC News •••••••••••••• 1,2,3 Center for Action Research and Social
Abrahamse, Allen ••••.••..•. 177 Science Educatlon Consortium • • • . 115
Abt Associates, Inc. •.• 39, 69, 70, 93, 94 Center for Urban Affairs and Policy
Adams, Kennoth • • • . • • • . • • • • 137 Research •••••••••••••••• 7
AIkman, Alexander • • • . • . • • • • • • 94 Chabota', Kent •••••••.••••• 116
American Institutes for Research • . • . . 17 Chaiken, Jan Michael •••••••••.. 53
American Justice Institute •••.••• .114 Chaiken, Marcia R. . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2
American Political Science Association • • • 3 Champagne, Anthony S. .......73, 85
Andrews, Frank M. • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 Church, Thomas W., Jr. • • . • • • . • • .96
Annan, Sampson O. ••••••• • 176, 207 Clarke, Stevens H. ..........73, 74
Apao, William K. .••..•••.•••• 39 Clements, William H. ...........74
Archer, Dane • . • . . • • • • • • . • . 200 Clinard, Marshall B. • .••••••..• 143
Association of the Bar of the City of Cohen, Jacqueline ••••.•••• 43, 126
New York •••.•••.•.•.•.. 96 Cole, George F. • ••••..••..•.. 97
Athens, Lonnie A. • •••.....••• 118 Cook, Royer • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • 200
Austin, James ••.•..•••... 40, 41 Court Statistics and Information
- Management Project ••.••••• , .97
Cramer, James A. •••..••••••.• 84
B Cunniff, MarkA. ' .••••.•••.. 74,76
Curtis, Christine • • • • • • • • • • • 22, 133
Bachman. Jerald G. •••.•.•••. 121
Baird, James • • • , • • • • • . . • . • 162
Baldus, David C. , • • • . • • • • . . 70, 71
Baumer, Terry .•...••••••.. 147
o
Bayley, David . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 Davis, James A. . • • • • . • . • • • 8, 9, 10
Bell, Raymond ••• • . • • • • • • • • . 43 Davis, Robert C. . • . • • • • • • . 201, 209
Bennett, Richard R. •••••••.•• 147 Debro, Julius .•.••••••..••• 127
Berk, Richard A. ••••.•••.... 168 Denno, Deborah W. • • • . . • . . . • • i 27
Block, Carolyn Rebecca ••..•.•• 14$ The Drl.!g Abuse Council, Inc. • ••.••• 96
Block, Michael K. • • • • . • • . • . • . 143 PunICI'd, Franklyn W. ••••.•.••• 169
Blumenthal, Monica D. • • • • • . . • . • .4 putch Ministry of Justice ..•.•••• 202
Blumstein, Alfred • • • • • • • • • • .43, t26
Bode, Nancy • • • • • • • . • . . . • • 144
Boland, Barbara ••••.•••••.•• 71 E
Bowers, William J. •••••.••• 162, 169
Bradshaw, Richard Alfred .•.••• •• 43 Edelhertz, Herbert • . • . • • • . • • • . 170
Brooks, laure W. • • • • . • • • . • • . 184 Elmermann, Thomas ••.••••.•.• 85
Brown, Dale K. • • • . • • • • . • • •• 182 Eisenstein, James •.•••.••.•••• 86
Bureau of Justice Statistics • . • 1, 27·38, 59, Elliott, Delbert . . . • . • • . • 127·129,169
60,62,65-69,91,92,109·111,113,114,
167,187,188,193,195,197-199
Bureau of Social Science Research, Inc. .114 F
Bureau of the Census •••• 148,149,157
Bynum, Timothy S. • . • . . • • • • • • 184 Farrington, David P. . • . . • . • • • • • 129
Federal Bureau of Investigation .•• 150-157
Federal Judicial Center ........98, 99
c Feeney, Floyd •.•••.•..•••.•• n
Felstiner, William LF. . . . . . . . . . . . 82
Camp, Geroge M. • ••••••.•.•• 115 Feyerherm, William H.••..••••.• 116
Carrington, Michael D. ••• • • • . . • 147 Flgllo, Robert M••••..•.• 129,138,165

Index 211
Fleming, Roy B. •••••.••••••• 86 J
Forst, Brian • • • • • • • • • • • 77, 117, 205
FowlEr, Floyd J. • •••••••••••• 17 Jacob, Herbert ••••••••••••• 141
Fox, James Alan ••••••• 157,159,162 Jesness, Carl F. • • • • • • • • • • • • • 131
FrE¥. David • • • • • • • • • • 19 Johnston, Uoyd D. • •••••••••• 121
Furstenberg, Frank, Jr. • • • • • • • • • 139
K
G
Kahn, Robert L . . . . . . . . . . 4
Gartner, Rosemary • • • • • • . • • • • 200 Kansas City, Missouri, Police
Gelles, Richard J. •••••••.• 203, 209 Department • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 171
Gibbs, John J. •••••••• ••• 203, 204 Katz, Jack • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 131
Gilliland, Michael • • • • . . • • • • • • 178 Kerstetter, Wayne A. • •••••••••• 82
Gold, Martin •••••••••••• 130,131 Klecka, Wesley •••••••••••••• 3
Goldkamp, John S. • • • • • • , • • • • • 80 Klein, Malcolm W. • • • • • • • • • • • • 171
Goodstein, Lynne •••••••••••• 44 Knight, Rayrnond .............53
Gorden, Margaret A. •••. • • • • • • 171 Kobrin, Solorno., •••••••••••• .18
Gottfredson, Michael R. ••••••••• 80 Kramer, John H•..•••••••••.•• 44
Gould, LeRoy ••••.•••••••. .115 Krepps·Hess, Barbara J. . •••••••• 46
Greenberg, David F. •••••.•••• 158 Krlsberg, Barry •.••••••••• .40,41
Greenberg, Stephanie .••••••••• 18 Kritzer, Herbert M. • • • • • • • • • • • • .82
Grofman, Bernard • • • • • • • 99
Grossman, Joel B. • • • • • • • • 82
Groves, Robert M. . . . . . . . . . , . 204 L
Gurr, Erika . • • . • • • , . • • • • • • 158
Gurr, Ted Robert • • • . • • • • • • • . 158 lattimore, Pamela K. ...........47
Laumann, Edward O. ••••. . • • . • 100
Lavrakas, Paul J. •••••••••. 11, 142
H Uzotte, Alan J. . • • • • • • • • . . • • • 159
Loeber, Rolf ••••.•••••.•••• 132
Haapenan, Rudy • • • • • . • • • • • . 131 Loftln, Colin •••.•••••• • • • ,19, 83
Hakim, Simon . . . , . . . . . . . . . .118 Los Angeles District Attorney's Office ••• 48
Hammett, Theodore M. . • • • . • • • • 100 Lurlglo, Arthur J. • . • • • • • • • • 142, 209
Harper, Dean .•••.•.••••••.• 44
Harrell, Adele . • • • • • • • • • • • . . 200
Hartigan, Richard .•••.••••. •• 45 M
Heck, Joseph • • • • • . 162
Heinz, John P. .•.••.•.••••• 100 MacKenzie, Doris L. •••••••••••• 44
Hellman, Daryl A. • . . • • • . . • • • • 159 Mahoney, Barry •••••.•••.•••• 97
Henderson, Joel ••••.•.••.• •• 22 Mande, Mary J. ••••.•••••••. .50
Hepburn, John R. , . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Manpower Demonstration Research
Hernon, Jolene C. .••.•.•..•• 205 Corporation • • • • • • • • . . • • • • .50
Heumann, Milton • . • • . . . . • • • • • 83 Marans, Robert W. ............23
Hewitt, John ••••••••••..•. 159 Marsden, Mary Ellen ••.•••••••• 51
Hindus, Michael S. • • . • • . • • • .80, 100 Martin, Susan . • • • • • • • • • • • • • 172
Hirsch, Jon ••.•..•.•. , • , •. 169 Marvell, Thomas ••••.••••••• 101
Hirsch, Ronald L . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Matulia, Kenneth J. •••.••••••• 173
Hobson, Barbara M. ••••••••.• 100 Maxson, Cheryl L . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
Holeman, Herbert ••••••••..•. 46 Maynard·Moody, Steven ••••••••. 52
Home Office Research and Planning McCampbell, Michael S. • ••••••• 173
Unit •••.••.•••.••.••• 206 McCarthy, Jack •••.••.••••••• 49
Huizinga, David •••••.•.•.•• 169 McDevitt, Jack ••••••••.•••. 169
McDonald, William F. . •••••.• 84,118
McPherson, Marlys •••.•••••••• 19
Mendelsohn, Harold • • • • • . • • • • • • 11
Messinger, Sheldon •••••••••••• 51
The illinois Criminal Justice Information Mlethe, Terance •••••••.•••.•• 84
Authority • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • 148 Mihajlovlc, Steve . . , . . . . . . . . . 178
Innes, Christopher A. . . • . • • • • . • 207 Milder, N. David • • • . . . . . . • . . • . 20
Institute for Law and Social Research, Inc. 81 Milkman, Raymond H.•• , •••••••• 20
Miller, Frederick .••.•..••••••• 94

212 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data


Miller, HerbertS•••.•••••••••• 84 Pogue, Thomas F. •••••••••••• 141
Minnesota Criminal Justice System Driving Polich, Suzanne . . . • . . • • . • • . • • 53
While Intoxicated Task Force .•.•• 21 Polk, Kenneth • . . . . . . • . . • • . . 134
Minnesota State Court Administration . 103 Prentky, Robert • . . . . . • • . . . . . • 63
Minton, Thomas J. . ..•..••••.• 118 Pretrial Services Resource Center ..•. 87
Missouri Division of Youth Services • • . 103 Pulaski, Charles A., Jr. ........70, 71
Monkkonen, Eric . . . . • . . . . . . • 174
Moody, Carlisle • . . . • , . • . . • . • 101
Moore, Charles A. ..•.•••••.• 84 R
Musheno, Michael . . . . . . . 52
Rafter, Nicole Hahn . . . • . • . . • . 54
The Rand Corporation ••••••••• 54,65
N Reinbolt, Kathleen . . . . . • . . • . . • . 85
Reiss, Albert J., Jr. •••.•... 178· 180
Nagsl, Stuart S. •..• 73, 85, 86, 101, 106 Research Triangle Institute •••...• 208
Nardulli, Peter . . . . • . . . • . . . . • 86 Rhodes, William . • . . • • . . • • • 77,117
The National Association of Criminal Richardson, Richard . . . . • . . . • . . • 13
Justice Planners . . . • • • • . . • . • 76 Riedel, Marc • • . . . . . . • • . . 163,165
National Center for Health Statistics 159,161 Rodgers, Willard L. . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
National Center for Juvenile Justice . 102·104 Romm, Joseph •..• . . . . • . 56
National Center for State Rosenbaum, DennlsP. . . . . . • . . • 142
Courts • • . . • . . • . • . 86,87,97,105 Rossi, Peter • • . • . . . . . • • . . .56, 68
National Institute of Justice . . . . . . • 132 Rowland, C.K. • • . . • . 105
National Opinion Research Center • • . . 12
Nebraska Commission on Law Enforcement
and Criminal Justice . . . . . . . . • . 104 s
Neff, Marian • . . . . . . . . . . • • • . 86
New York Daily News . . • . . • . • . . 13 Sarat, Austin . . . . . . • . • .82
The New York TImes . . . . . . . 5·7, 12, 14 Schmidt, Peter . . . • . • . . . .56
Nold, Fredrick C. . • . . • . • . . . • . 143 Schreiber, Jan E. ••• . . . . . 208
Nurco, David . . • . . . . • • . . . • 21, 52 Schuerman, Leo A. •. • . . . . . 18
Sellin, Thorsten . • . • . • . . . . . . . 138
Shannon, Lyle W. •.. . . . . . . . 23, 135
o Shelly, Peggy L . . . . . . . . . . 203, 204
Sherman, Lawrence W. • . • . . . • . • 168
O'Keefe, Garrett J. • • • • • • • • • . •• 11 Silloway, Glenn •••••••••••••• 19
O'Malley, Patrick M. . . . . . . . . . . 121 Silverstein, Lee • . • . • . . • • . • . . 106
Office of Justice Assistance, Research, Singer, Simon I. • . . . • • . • . . . . • 165
and Statistics . . . • . . . . • . • . . 119 Sipes, Dale Anne . . . • . . . . • . . . . 88
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Skogan, Wesley G. . . • . . . 3, 11, 24, 209
Prevention . • . . . . . . . . . . . 61·63 Smith, Barbara . . . • • . . . . . . • . 200
Oram, Mary Elsner . . . . • . . . . . 8S, 94 Smith, D. RMdail .............49
Orne, MartinT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174 Smith, Tom W. . . . . . . ... 9,10
Orsagh, Thomas • . . . • . . . . . • . . 51 Smith, William R. • . . • . • . . . . . . . 49
Ostrom, Elinor . . . . . . • • . . • . . 175 Snortum, John R., • • . . • . • . . . 57,181
Overcast, Thomas D. • . . . . . • • . . 170 Spaeth, Harold J. . • . • . • • . . . . . 106
Sparks, Richard F. . . . . . • • . • . .88, 89
Spelman, William • . . . • . • • . . 25, 182
p Spohn, Cassia • . • . • • . • • . . • • . 90
Stillman, Frances A. . . . . . • . . • . . 182
Palumbo, Dennis J. • . . . . • . . . • . 52 Straus, Murray A. • .••..•.• 203,209
Parks, Roger B. . • • . . . . . . . . . 175 Sutton, L Paul . . . . . . . , . . . . . 185
Pate, Antony M. • . • . . . • • • . 176, 207 Swicord, Donald . . . . • . • • . . . . • 136
Paternoster, Raymond '" • . . • . . 133
Pearson, Frank S. . . • . • . . . . . • . 62
Pennell, Susan • . . . • . . • . . • .22, 133 T
Pennsylvania Sentencing Commission . 105
Petersilia, Joan • . . . . . . . . • • • . 177 Taub, Richard . . . • . • . . . . 25
Peterson, James • . . • . . . . . • • . 139 Taylor, D. Garth • . . • • . . . . . . . . . 25
Peterson, Joseph L . . . . . . . . . . 178 Tayman, Jeff • . . . . . . . . . . • . • 133
Peterson, Mark A. • • . . . . . . . . • . 53 Teplin, Unda A. • . • . • . . . . . • • . 183
Pierce, Glenn L . . . . . . . 157, 162, 169 Thompson, James W•••••••••••• 25

Index 213
little, Charles R. • ••••.••.•.•. 13 Whitaker, Gordon P. . . • . . • . . . . . 175
Toborg, Mary A. ••.••.••..••• 89 Whitehouse, Wayne G. . . . • . . . • • 174
Toeh, Hans • . • . . . . . . • . . . . . 137 Wice, Paul .•...• . .86
Tracy, Paul E. • . . . • . • . . • . 129,165 Widom, Cathy Spatz . . . . . . . • • . 137
Triplett, Ruth ...• • • . . 183 Williams, Jay R. . . • . • . . . . . . . . 131
Trubek, David M. . • . • . . . . . . . • • 82 Wilson, James Q. ••• • • • • • • • • • 177
Wise, lois Recascino . • . . . . • . . . 119
Witte, Ann D. • . . . . . • . . . . . . . . 56
U Wolfgang, Marvin E. • . • . . . 129,138,165
Woodworth, George . • . . . . . • . .70, 71 .".
Uchida, Craig D. . . . • . • . . . . • . 184 Wright, James . • . • • . . . • . • . . . .58
United States Sentencing Commission 107 Wright, Kevin. . . . . . . . . . .58

v y
Van Duizend, Richard . . . . . . . . • 185 Yankelovlch, Skeltj, and White, Inc. • 108
Vandaele, Waiter . • • . . . . . . . . . 164 Yeager, Peter C. . . . . • . • • . 143
Vera Institute of Justice, New York City 108

W
z
Zahn, Margaret A. . . . . . . 163, 165
WABC·TV . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 13 Zedlewski, Edwin W. • • • • . . . . . . 120
Washington Post . • . • . . . . . . . 2,3,15 Zeuhl, James ••..•.. • . . . . 166
WCBS·TV News • . . . . . . . . • . . . 14 Zill, Nicholas . 139
Weisburd, David ., . . • . . • . . . . 144 Zimring, Franklin E. • . . . . . . . . . • 166
Welch, Susan • . . • . . . • . • . . 90
Wheeler, Stanton • . . • . . . . • . . . 144

214 National Archive of Criminal Justice Data

You might also like