Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The National Archive of CJ Data 1991 PDF
The National Archive of CJ Data 1991 PDF
The National Archive of CJ Data 1991 PDF
have
-issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov.
--.--~------ -----
Data Collections
Available From
1 f~CJRS
't
J." UUL 14 1992
-i
f
Sponsored by the Bureau af Justice Statistics ulty. staff. and students at member schools to
(BJS) In the U.S. Department of Justice, the take advantage of the full range of /CPSR
National Archive of Criminal Justice Data was sElfVices. Because ICPSR Is structured as a
established In 1978 under the auspices of the "partnership' with Its member Institutions, it Is
Inter-university Consortium for Political and able to provide facilities and services to reo
Social Research (ICPSR). Headquarters of searchers and scholars that no one college or
the Criminal Justice Archive are located, along university could offer independently. Most
with the central staff of ICPSR, in the Institute ICPSR services are provided at no charge to
for Social Research at the University of Michigan. the Individual user.
The central mission of the Criminal Justice Ar- Each member institution designates one per-
chive Is to facilitate and encourage research son on campus to serve as the "ICPSR Offi-
in the field of criminal justice through the shar- cial Representative" (OR). The OR functions
ing of data resources. Specific goals inciude: as a liaison between ICPSR and the member
school and can answer questions about data
• Providing computer-readable data for the already on campus and arrange for local us-
quantitative study of crime and the crimi- ers to obtain access to data housed at ICPSR.
nal justice system through the develop-
ment of a central data archive that dis-
seminates computer-readable data
• Supplying technical assistance in select· How to Order Data
Ing data collections and the computer
hardware and software for analyzing data Individuals at member institutions can order
efficiently and effectiveiy data through their campus ORs. Individuals at
• Offering training In quantitative methods of nonmember Institutions may obtain ICPSR
social science research to facilitate secon- data by paying an access fee. The Bureau of
dary analysis of criminal jLlstice data Justice Statistics supports the utilization of
criminal justice data by individuals working in
government or under grants from the Depart-
ment of Justice.
Inter-university Consortium for
Users at nonmember institutions or In govern-
Political and Social Research ment agencies wishing to order criminal jus-
tice-related data collections should contact
Since 1962, ICPSR has served the academic Criminal Justice Archive staff members di·
community by acquiring, processing, and dis- rectly. Individuals at member schools can
tributing data relevant to a broad spectrum of also contact staff regarding substantive and
academic disciplines Including criminology, technical issues. Call or write to:
political science, sociology, law, history, eco-
nomics, gerontology, public health, and educa- National Archive
tion. The Consortium maintains the world's larg- of Criminal Justice Data
est repository of computer-based research and ICPSR
instructional data for the social sciences. Institute for Social Research
P.O. Box 1248
ICPSR is a membership-based organization Ann Arbor. MI48106
with over 350 member colleges and universi-
ties in the United States and abroad. Pay- 80Q-999-0960
ment of an annual institutional fee entitles fac- 313-763-5010
Introduction iii
Using the catalog
-
This catalog Includes descriptions of the data readable codebook (which may be edited and
collections relevant to research on criminal updated as required by further processing), a
Justice. Collections are organized by topic. multllithed draft version, or a photocopy of the
Study descriptions Include a brief outline of Investigator's codebook. My peculiarities In
the substantive content of the collection as the data will be Indicated irl the documenta-
well as the number and length of records In tion. A copy of the documentation will be sup-
the data IlIe(s). plied When the data are requested.
As part of each study description, a ·class Class III studies have been checked by the
designation" is given which Indicates the level ICPSR staff for the appropriate number of
of ICPSR processing conducted. This classifi- cards per case and accurate data locations
cation scheme Is not an Indicator of the sub- as specified by the investigator's codebook.
stantive quality of the data, nor does It always Often frequency checks on these data have
correspond to any given level of technical been made. Known data discrepancies and
data quality. other problems, If any, will be communicated
to the user at the time the data are requested.
Data are usually made available In two One copy of the codebook for these data will
stages: first, in the technical condition In be supplied when the data are requested.
Which they are received (Class IV). and later, The data themselves usually exist only In
after the completion of processing, the nature card Image form.
of Which Is determined by external advisory
committees and the ICPSR staff (Class lor Class IV studies are distributed In the form re-
II). In this way, an attempt Is made to provide ceived by ICPSR from the originallnvestlga-
reasonably quick access to data as they are tcr. Users of Class IV data should keep sev-
released by the pr;nclpallnvestigator and also eral considerations In mind. Problems may
to redlsseminate the data after additional exist which would not be known before proc-
work has been performed on the data and essing begins, and thus ICPSR can take no
documentation. responsibility for the technical condition of the
data The requestor, therefere, must be pre-
Class I datasets have been checked, corrected pared to accept some uncertalnty as to the
if necessary, and formatted to ICPSR specifica- condition of the data Requests for these stud-
tions. Also, the data may have been reccxied ies will normally require a longer time to com-
and reorganized in consultation with thf;llnvesti- plete than more fully processed studies. In
gator to maximize their utilization and accessi- addition, staff assistance on problems en-
bility. A ccxiebook, often capable of being read countered in the use of Class IV data will be
by a computer, is available. This ccxiebook fully limited. This policy is Intended to ensure that
documoots the data and may include descrip- staff resources are maximized while at the
tive statistics such as frequencies or means. same time not preventing early access to
For those Class I datasets thai have ccxis- data for those who must have them as soon
books available In printed form, a copy of the as possible. The documentation for Class IV
printed ccxiebook Is supplied routinely to seeh studies is reproduced from the material origi-
ICPSR Official Representative. All Class I stud- nally received. One copy of the documenta-
Ies E¥'e available on magnetic tape In either tion will be supplied upon request from the Of-
card Image or OSIRIS format. ficial Representative.
Class II studies have been checked and for- Data collections Included In this catalog repre-
matted to ICPSR standards. All nonnumeric sent only a partial listing of the holdings of
codes have been removed. The studies in ICPSR. Users are strongly urged to consult
this class are available on magnetic tape in the ICPSR Guide to Resources and Serv-
either OSIRIS or card Image format. The ices for a complete listing of the archive's
documentation exists as either a machine- data collections.
Introduction v
Contents
I. Attitude surveys 1
VI. Courts 91
Introduction vii
List of data collections
Sipes, Dale Anne and Mary Elsner Oram Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Analyzing trial time in California, U.S. Department of Justice
Colorado, and New J£lrsey, 1986 National survey of court organization:
(ICPSR 9223) . • • . . • • . . • . • . • 88 Courts and court division, 1971·1972
(ICPSR 7640) . • • • • • • • . • . • • . . 92
Sparks, Richard F.
Massachusetts statewide criminal justice Abt Associates, Inc.
guidelines evaluation, 1979: Sentencing Federal justice statistics program data,
data 1978·1986: [United States]
(ICPSR 7909) . • . . . • • . . • • • . • 88 (lCPSR 9296) . . • . . . • . • . . • • . . 93
Heinz, John P. and Edward O. Laumann National Center for Juvenile Justice
Chicago lawyers survey, 1975 and Nebraska Commission on Law
(ICPSR 8218) . . . • . . • • . . . . . 100 Enforcement and Criminal Justice
Nebraska juvenile court records,
Hindus, Michael S., Theodore M. Hammett, 1975·1987
and Barbara M. Hobson (ICPSR8915) . . • . . . . . . . • . . . 104
Massachusetts superior court files,
1859-1959 National Center for State Courts
(ICPSR 7776) . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Public image of courts, 1977: General
public data
Hirsch, Ronald L (ICPSR 7703) . . . . . . • . . . . . . . 105
National survey of lawyers' career Public image of courts, 1977: Special
satisfaction, 1984 publics data
(ICPSR 8975) . . . . . . . . • . . . 100 (ICPSR 7704) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Marvell, Thomas and Carlisle Moody Pennsylvania Sentencing Commission
State appellate court adaptation to Pennsylvania sentencing data, 1977, 1980,
caseload increase, 1968-1984: 1983
[United States] (ICPSR 8327) . . . . . • . . • . . . . . 105
(ICPSR 8262) • . • . • . . . . . . . • 101
Rowland, C.K.
Nagel, Stuart S. Federal district court civil decisions,
Federal court cases, 1962-1963 1981-1987: Detroit, Houston, and Kansas
(ICPSR 7245) . . . . . . . . . . • . 101 City
(ICPSR 9367) . . . . . . • . . . . . . • 105
Nagel, Stuart S.
Judicial characteristics and judicial Silverstein, Lee and Stuart S. Nagel
decision-making study, 1955 American bar foundation: State criminal
(ICPSR 7084) . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 court cases, 1962
(ICPSR 7272) . . • . . . . . . . . . . . 106
National Center for Juvenile Justice
Juvenile court statistics, 1982: Spaeth, Harold J.
[United States] United States supreme court judicial
(ICPSR 8440) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 database, 1953-1988 terms
(ICPSR 9422) • . . • . . . . . • . • . . 106
National Center for Juvenile Justice
Juvenile court statistics, 1983: United States Sentencing Commission
[United States] Monitoring of federal criminal sentences,
(ICPSR 8656) . • . . . . . . . . . . . 102 1987-1989
(ICPSR9317) . . • . . . . . . . . . • . 107
Attitude surveys 1
ABC News presidential vote choIce, education, age, relig-
ion, social class, marital status, household
ABC News poll of public opinion on composition, labor union membership, em-
crime, December 1982 ployment status, race, sex, Income, and
state/region of residence. Class IV
(ICPSR 8100)
Universe: Adults aged 18 and over living In
thIs survey was conducted by Chilton Re- households with telephones In the 48 contigu-
search ServIces for ABC News. IntervIews ous United States and the District of
were conducted wIth 2,464 respondents dur- Columbia
Ing December of 1982. Respondents were
questioned regardIng their perceptIons of Sampling: Households were selected by ran-
crime and the crImInal justice system. Ques- dom digit dialing. Within household, the re-
tions assessed the respondents' fears of be- spondent selected was the adult living in the
Ing a victim of crime, perceptions of the household who last had a birthday and who
seriousness of crime In the U.S., eVa/uatlon was at home at the time of the interview.
of the Judicial and penal systems, assess-
ment of police performance, and confidence Note: The data contain blanks and alphabetic
in the ability of the police to prevent crime. characters. A weight variable is included that
The poll also ask~d respondents' opinions to- must be used in any analysis.
ward Reagan's policies, the state of the econ-
omy, and government spending. This data col- Extent of collection: 1 data file
lection consists of a machine-read-able
codebook and an OSIRIS data file with a logi- Card image data format
cal record length of 158 c~\racters. A card-im-
age file is also available. There are 147 vari- rectangular file structure
ables for 2,464 cases. Class II 1,518 cases
121 variables
80-unlt-long record
4 records per case
ABC News/WashIngton Post
ABC News/ Washington Post poll,
January 1990
ABC News/Washington Post
(ICPSR 9436)
ABC News/Washington Post poll,
Summary: This data collection is part of a con- February 1990
tinuing series of monthly surveys that evalu- (iCPSR 9438)
ate the Bush presidency and solicit opinions
on a varlet)' of political and s()Ciallssues. Re- Summary: This data collection Is part of a con-
spondents were asked to name the two most tinuing series of monthly surveys that evalu-
important problems facing the country, if they ate the Bush presidency and solicit opinions
approved of the way George Bush was han- on a variety of political and social Issues. Re-
dling the nation's economy, the environment, spondents were asked if they approved of the
the Illegal drug problem, and foreign affairs, way George Bush was handling the nation's
and If they trusted federal, state, and local economy, the illegal drug problem, foreign af-
governments to do what was right. Respon- fairs, and relations with China, and if they ap-
dents also were questioned cLS to which politi- proved of the way George Bush, Congress,
cal party they trusted to do a better job han- and Dan Quayle were handling their jobs. In
dling a variety of political, economic, and addition, respondents were questioned re-
social problems, If they thought things would garding Bush's State of the Union address
get better in the next ten years, and how they and the leadership roles of Bush and Con-
wouid rate the military and economic power gress. Other topics covered inclUde the capi-
of the United States vis-a-vis Japan and the tal gains tax, abortion, the Social Security sys-
Soviet Union over the past 20 years. Other tem, defense spending, the upcoming
topics covered include the United States' mili- international drug summit, and drug trafficking
tary action in Panama, Manuel Noriega, the il- In Colombia. Background Information on re-
legal drug problem, and respondents' satisfac- spondents includes political alignment, 1988
tion with careers, marriage, children, and presidential vote choice, education, age, relig-
cultural life. Background information on re- ion, social class, marital status, household
spondents Includes political alignment, 1988 composition, labor union membership, em-
Attitude surveys 3
Blumenthal, Monica D., Robert L. Kahn, role of the respondents' personal values, their
and Frank M. Andrews definitions of violence, and their identification
with the groups Involved In violence. To exam-
ICPSR Instructional subset: Justifying ine the degree of violence which American
violence: Attitudes of American men, men felt could be justified for social conirol,
1969 the Investigators asked respondents to react
to situations Involving protests and other dis-
(lCPSR 7517) turbances. These situations Included hood-
lUm gang disturbances, student protests, and
This Instructional subset of 62 variables from black protest demonstrations. The respon-
the original justifying v!olence study Includes dents were asked what police actlons-from
an Initial series of questions which a"lk "letting it go" to ·shootlng to kliI"-were appro-
whether respondents view such actions as priate as police control measures. Several
protest demonstrations, police frisking, loot- such Items were combined to form an Index
Ing, burglary, and draft-card burning as vio- of "vIolence for social control." In questions
lence. Then the study Inquires about possible dealing with the level of violence necessary to
causes of violence and motives of those who bring about social change, respondents were
participate in violence. Another set of vari- asked whether they agreed with the necessity
ables deals with relative views of property of "protest In which some people will be killed"
damage and personal injury and respondents' in order to bring about changes sought by
agreement or disagreement with such state- blacks, by student demonstrators, and in gen-
ments as "it is often necessary to use vio- eral. These items were combined Into an In-
lence to prevent violence," "many people dex of "violence for social change." Class II
learn only through violence," and "when a per-
son harms you, you should turn the other Related Publication:
cheek and forgive him." Respondents were Blumenthal, Monica D., Robert L Kahn,
also asked for their views on the roles of Frank M. Andrews, and Kendra B. Head
courts and police agencies in combating Justifying violence: Attitudes of American
crime. Then, after a number of demographic men. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for So-
and socioeconomic variables (education, cial Research, 1972.
age, region of the country), the subset con-
cludes with a number of derived indices of vio-
lence attitudes which draw upon survey ques-
tions to form general patterns. These derived
Indices include attitudes toward retributive jus- CBS News
tice, self-defense, kindness, suspicion, and CBS News "48 Hours" gun poll, March
trust. Finalty, several summary measures 1989
gauge the respondents' general approval of
violence for social control and social change (ICPSR 9233)
purposes. (See ICPSR 3504 for full file.)
Summary: This data collection consists of re-
sponses to a nationwide survey of Issues sur-
rounding assault weapons. Topics covered in-
Blumenthal, Monica D., Robert L. Kahn, clude legislation regulating the Importation,
sale, and manufacture of assault weapons,
and Frank M. Andrews the sale and use of handguns, and the Na-
Justifying violence: Attitudes of tional Rifle Association. Respondents also
Ame:-Ican men, 1969 were asked to rate the performance of
George Bush as president and to specify
(ICPSR 3504) what they thought was the most Important
problem facing the country. Background Infor-
This survey of attitudes of American men re- mation on respondents Includes political party
garding violence was conducted In the sum- affiliation, sex, age, education, firearm owner-
mer of 1969 by the Survey Research Center ship, and race. Class III
of the Institute for Social Research at The Uni-
versity of Michigan. Tne survey included re- Universe: Adults aged 18 and over in the
sponses from 1,374 men, aged 16-64, drawn United States.
from the Survey Research Center's national
sample of dwellings. The investigators exam- Sampling: Stratified random digit dialing.
ined the level of violence which respondents
viewed as justified to accomplish social con- Note: This file contains a weight variable that
trol and social change and emphasized the must be used in any analysis. Tho data con-
Attitude surveys 5
Sampling: Stratified random digit dialing. Part 7
Texas
Note: These files contain a weight variable rectangular file structure
that must be used in any analysis. The data 742 cases
contain blanks. Telephone exchanges have 63 variables
been receded to '999' for reasons of SO-unit-long record
confidentiality. 2 records per case
Attitude surveys 7
conditions In their home areas, their relation- ogy and social deviance. Information was ob-
ship to their neighbors, who they know and tained from 1,504 respondents In the form of
visit around their homes, and What they watch 222 variables. The data were collected by the
on TV and read in the newspapers. Also In- NORC as the second In a series of General
cluded were a number of questions measur- Social Surveys. The survey was administered
Ing respondents' perceptions of the extent of in March 1973 to a cross-section national
crime in their communities, whether they sample of adults 18 years of age or older.
knew someone who had been a victim, and The data were obtained from the Roper Cen-
what they had done to reduce their own ter for Public Opinion Research. Class I
chances of being victirnlzed. Data are avail-
able in both OSIRIS and card-image formats,
with machine-readable documentation. There
are approximately 200 variables for each of Davis, James A.
the 5,121 cases. Class II
General social survey, 1974
(lCPSR 7341)
Davis, James A. As in 1972 and 1973, the 1974 Interview in-
General social survey, 1972 cludes items selected by the National Opinion
Research Center (NORC) staff and an advi-
(ICPSR 7309) sory panel of sociologists as "mainstream" in-
terests of academic sociology. In addition to
In addition to the standard personal charac- standard personal data items, the 1974 sur-
teristic Items, the survey covers items viewed vey covers such areas of Interest as the fam-
by the National Opinion Research Center ily, soclo-economlc status, social mobility, and
(NORC) staff and an advisory panel of soci- morale. About two-thirds of the questlonnalre
ologists as "mainstream" interests of modern probed for attitudes and opinions concerning
academic sociology. The interview covers the qualities of a job, satisfaction with life, roles of
areas of stratification, the family, race rela- women, birth control and abortion, sex rela-
tions, social control, civil liberties, and morale. tions, race relations, social control Issues,
A major objective of the project was the repli- and civil liberties. Information was obtained
cation of questions which have appeared in from 1,484 respondents In the form of 240
previous national surveys. Information was variables. The data were collected by the
obtained from 1,613 respondents in the form NORC as the third in a five-year series of
of 123 variables The data were collected by General Social Surveys. The survey was ad-
the NORC as the first in a five year series of ministered in March 1974 to a national cross-
General Social Surveys. The survey was ad- section sample of adults 18 years of age or
ministered in February-April 1972 to a na- older. The data were obtained from the Roper
tional cross-section sample of adults 18 years Center for Public Opinion Research. Class I
of age and older. The data were obtained
from the Roper Center for Public Opinion
Research. Class I
Davis, James A.
General social survey, 1975
Davis, James A. (ICPSR 7367)
General social survey, 1973
The survey covers items viewed by the Na-
(ICPSR 7315) tional Opinion Research Center (NORC) staff
and an advisory panel of sociologists as
The survey covers items viewed by the Na- "mainstream" Interests of modern academic
tional Opinion Research Center (NORC) staff sociology. In addition to standard personal
and an advisory panel of sociologists as data items, the 1975 survey covers such ar-
"mainstream" interests of modern academic eas of interest as race relations, the family, so-
sociology. As in the 1972 survey, the interview cial control, leisure activities, education, mor-
covers the areas of socioeconomic status and als, violence, and pornography. information
social mobility, intrafamlly relations, life cycle was obtained from 1,490 respondents in the
related changes in behavior, racial attitudes, form of apprOXimately 102 variables. The
social control, civil liberties, and morale. Addi- data were collected by the NORC as the
tional questions were added dealing with ecol- fourth In a five-year series of General Social
Attitude surveys 9
Austria. Data from this multinational collabora- Universe: English speaking persons aged 18
tion are being released in the 1972-1987 cu- and ova', living in non-institutional arrange-
mUlative data set. Class IV ments in the United States.
Universe: English speaking persons 18 years Sampling: National Opinion Research Center
of age or ovr!r, living in noninstitutional ar- multistage area probability national sample.
rangements within the United States.
Note: Data for surveys contained In previous
Sampling: National Opinion Research Center cumulative flies remain SUbstantively the
muitistage area probability national sample. same, while particulars of record structure
have changed to accommodate the inclusion
Extent of collection: 1 data file + SPSS con- of 1988 data.
trol cards
Extent of collection: 1 data file + SPSS con-
Card image data format with SPSS control trol cards
cards
Card image data format with SPSS control
rectangular file structure cards
21,875 cases
1,157 variables rectangular file structure
80-unit-long record 23,356 cases
21 records per case 1,327 variables
80-unit-long record
26 records per case
Attitude surveys 11
I
ate the Impact of a national crime prevention The New York Times
campalgn which was In progress In 1980.
There are 352 variables In the data Class II New York 77mes race relations survey,
March 1987: New York City
(ICPSR 9214)
National Opinion Research Center Summary: This survey examines the attitudes
of New Yorkers toward race relations. Topics
General social survey, 1976 covered Include the racial composition of the
(lCPSR 7398) respondent's neighborhood and friends, the
most Important white and black leaders In
The 1976 survey replicates almost ali Items New York City, police brutality, discrimination
that have appeared In at least two other sur- on racial grounds for housing and Jobs, crime,
veys In this series. Major emphasis Is placed and Important problems facing New York City
on the attitudes and opinions of the respon- such as drugs, transportation, the poor and
dents on Issues such as the faml~, socio- homeless, corruption, and Illegal aliens. Addi-
economic status, social mobility, sooial con- tional questions asked of respondents Include
trol, race relations, sex relations, and morale. If they approved or disapproved of the way
In addition, Information on the respondents' Ed Koch handled his Job as maya, If New
partisan Identifications and thalr 1972 presl- York City courts were tougher on blacks or
dentlal vote Is Included. Information was ob- whites, If the level of racial discrimination had
tained from 1,499 respondents In the form of Increased or decreased, and If a preference
240 variables. The data were collected by the in hiring or promotion should be given to
National Opinion Research Center as the last blacks. Background Information on Individuals
In a five-year series of General Social Sur- Includes party affiliation, age, Income, sex, relig-
veys. The survey was administered In March Ious preference, education, and ra:::e. Class III
and April of 1976 to a national cross-section
sample of adults 18 years of age and older. Universe: Adults In New York City.
The data were obtalned from the Roper Cen-
ter for Public Opinion Research. Class I Sampling: Random sample.
Attitude surveys 13
rectangular file structure Part 2
505 cases Call back, June 26
27 variables rectangular file structure
80-unlt-long record 96 cases
2 records per case 83 variables
80·unlt·long record
2 records per case
Part 3
WOBS-TV News/The New York Times Upstate New York, June 21·25
WCBS-TV News/New York TImes race rectangular fila structure
relations poll, June 1988 455 casas
71 variables
(lCPSR 9106) 80-unlt·long record
2 records per case
Summary: This data collection consists of re-
sponses to a survey of social issues In the
New York City area. Part 1 covers a variety of
topics Including race relations, leadership WOBS·TV News/The New York Times
among the black community, treatment of Indi-
viduals by courts and police, opinions of politi- WCBS·TV NewslNew York TImes race
cal leaders and public figures, and the ban on relations poll, June 1990
smoking In public places. In addition respon-
dents were asked a series of questions con- (ICPSR 9502)
cerning the Tawana Brawley case, in which a
black teenager accused a group of white men Summary: This data collection Is a survey of
of abducting and sexually molesting her in social Issues In the New York City area. Re·
Dutchess County. In Part 2, respondents who spondents were asked for their opinions on
had said they thought Brawley's advisers the quality of life In New York City, the job be·
were lying about the incident were recon- long done by Marlo Cuomo as governor and
tacted and again asked their opinions of David Dinkins as mayor, and the most impor-
these Individuals. Part 3, asked of Dutchess tant problem facing New York City that the
County residents, replicated the Part 1 ques- mayor needed to address. Addltlonallnforma-
tionnaire, with the exception of several ques- tion was gathered from Black respondents
tions specific to New York City. Background In- concerning race relations. Items covered
formation on respondents Includes political were quality of the city's economy, the
party affiliation, age, Income, sex, religious mayor's handling of race relations In the city,
preference, education, and race. Class III leadership among the Black community, treat-
ment of Individuals by courts and police,
Universe: Adults aged 18 and over In New neighborhood safety of Individuals, criminal
York City and Dutchess County. victimization, media Involvement In race rela-
tions, and specific Incidents of racial Insults.
Sampling: Stratified random digit dialing. Background Information on respondents In-
cludes political party affiliation, ethnlclty,
Note: These files contain weig,t variables that amount of media usage, age, Income, sex, reo
must be used in any analysis. The data contain ligious preference, education, and race.
blanks. Telephone exchanges have been re- Class IV
coded to '999' for reasons of confidentiality.
Universe: Adults ~ed 18 and over In New York
Extent of collection: 3 data files + machine- City.
readable documentation
Sampling: Stratified random digit dialing.
Card image data format
Note: This file contains a weight variable that
Part 1 must be used In any analysis. The data con-
New York City, June 21-25 tain blanks. Telephone exchanges have been
rectangular file structure recoded to '999' and the names of respon-
676 cases dents have been blanked for reasons of
78 variables confidentiality.
80.unit·long record
2 records per case Extent of collection: 1 data file
Attitude surveys 15
Community studies
Extent of collection: 4 data files this study was sponsored by the United
States Department of Justice, Natlonallnsti-
Card Image data format tute of Justice. The grant numbers are 7S-NI·
99·0044, 75-NI-95-0026 and 79-NI·AX-0026.
Part 1
Global Summary: The Hartford project, funded
rectangular file strl)cture through the Hartford Institute of Criminal and
128 cases Social Justice, began In 1973. The program
228 variables was designed to reduce the rates of burglary
80·unlt-Iong record and robbery or purse snatching and the fear
5 records per case of those crimes. These victimization surveys
provide a consistent measure of the rate at
Part 2 which such crimes occur over time. The sur·
Acts.1 veys also provide critical measures of pea·
rectangular file structure pie's fears and concerns about crime. The
128 cases project's most distinctive feature was Its Inte·
171 variables grated approach. Physical design changes
80-unit-long record were planned, carried out, and coordinated
3 records per case with appropriate citizen and police efforts In a
unique three-pronged program. As part of its
extensive evaluation, the center collected resi~
dent survey data on four occasions over a
five year period: 1973, 1975,1976,1977, and
1979. One half of the Interviews were con-
ducted by telephone and one half In person.
Community studies 17
In each survef, except 1979, respondents re- ber of physical characteristics of parceis and
ported on experiences during the preceding blocks in the study neighborhoods, and as
12-month period; in 1979 the time reference the sampling frame for the household survef.
was the past two years. The survey questions The original data were collected by the City of
are very similar from year to year, with 1973 Atlanta Planning Bureau. There are 9,121
being the most unique. Each year there are cases and approximately 80 lJariables in the
sections with questions on victimization, fear, file. The Atlanta SURVEY fUe contains the re-
and perceived risk of being victims of the tar- sults of a household survey administered to a
get crimes, perceptions of and attitudes to- stratified random sample of households within
ward police, neighborhood problems and each of the study neighborhoods. Variables
neighbors, household and respondent charac- here include respondents' attitudes and be-
teristics. There are five files. The 1973 file havior reiated to the neighborhood, fear of
contains 891 cases and approximately 300 crime, avo/dance and protective measures,
variabies. There are 556 cases and approxi- and victimization experiences. Crime rates,
mately 175 variables in the 1975 survef. The land use, and housing characteristics of the
1976 file contains 249 variables for 146 block in which the respondent resides have
cases. This 1976 survey is not an inde- been coded onto each case record. The data
pendent sample as it was based on some of were collected between August and October
the same households interviewed In 1975. of 1980. There are 523 cases and approxl-
The 1977 file contains 358 variables for 885 mateiy 700 variables. Class II
cases, and the 1979 file contains 320 vari-
ables for 623 cases. Class II
Community st(.Jdies 19
In each commercial center, and person crime Summary: This date, collection was designed
rates for the entire commercial and residential to address the crime problem as a barrier to
area. the economic health of three outlying com-
mercial centers of New York City: Brooklyn,
Extent of collection: 5 data files Fordham Road In the Bronx, and Jamaica
Center In Queens. Included In the survey are
Card image data format variables concerning the respondent's age,
race, gender, family income, length of resi-
Part 1 dence, and personal victimization experience.
Commercial/Residential data Also included are variables pertaining to per-
rectangular file structure ceptions of safety, physical disorder In the
93 cases area, and source of Information about crime
150 variables in the commercial centEr. Class IV
80-unit-Iong record
7 records per case Universe: All residents in New York City com-
mercial districts of downtown Brooklyn, Ford-
Part 2 ham Road in the Bronx, and Jamaica Center
Area data In Queens.
rectangular file structure
24 cases Sampling: A random sample of residents liv-
183 variables ing in the three areas was systematically se-
80-unit-long record lected from the telephone directory.
9 records per case
Restrictions: For reasons of confidentiality,
Part 3 telephone numbers of respondents have
Telephone survey data been removed from the data file.
rectangular file structure
S70 cases Extent of collection: 1 data file
136 variables
SO-unit-long record Card image data format
4 records per case
rectangular file structure
Part 4 610 cases
Interview data 35 variables
rectangular file structure 80-unit-long record
213 cases 1 record per case
138 variables
SO-unit-long record Related Publications:
7 records per case Milder, N.D.
"Reducing the fear of downtown crime"
Part 5 (unpublished summary). Washington, DC:
Pedestrian activity data National Institute of Justice, 1987.
rectangular file structure Citizens Crime Commission of New York City
7,110 cases and Regional Plan Association
11 variables "Downtown safety, security, and economic
SO-unit-Iong record development program" (unpublished final
1 record per case report). Washington, DC: National Institute
of Justice, 1987.
Milder, N. David
Milkman, Raymond H.
Downtown safety, security, and
development In New York City, 1984 Employment services for ex-offenders,
1981-1984: Boston, Chicago, and San
(ICPSR 9326)
Diego
This study was sponsored by the United (ICPSR 8619)
States Department of JUstice, Nationallnsti-
tute ofJustice. The grant numbers are 84-IJ- This study was sponsored by the United States
CX-0006 and 85-IJ-CX-0070. Department of Justice, National Inst~ute of Jus-
tice. The grant number is 8O-IJ-CX-K013.
Community studies 21
concerning types of narcotic drug use, crime Shaffer, John W., et al.
~erns, and use of mariJtala, cocaine, bar- "Patterns of non-narcotic drug use among
bituates, CI/'lllhetamines, and Iibrlum. Class IV male narcotic addicts." Journal of Drug Is-
sues (In press).
Universe: Population of known narcotic of-
fenders arrested by the Baltimore police de-
partment between 1952 and 1976.
Sampling: The sample consists of 354 male Pennell, Susan, Christine Curtis, and Joel
narcotic addicts who were selected from a Henderson
population of 6,149 known narcotic offenders Guardian angels: CItizen response to
arrested by the Baltimore police department
between 1952 and 1976. The sample was crime In selected cities of the United
stratified by race and year of police contact. states, 1984
These 354 sample addicts were selected be- (ICPSR 8935)
cause they had used addictive narcotic drugs
at least four days per week for a period of
more than one month. The majority of sub- This study was sponsored by the United States
Jects were heroin addicts. Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number is 83-IJ-CX-0037.
Extent of collection: 3 data files + machine-
readable documentation Summary: This study was designed to
assess the effects of the activities of the
Card Image data format Guardian Angels on citizens' fear of crime, in-
cidence of crime, and police officers' percep-
Part 1 tions of the Guardian Angels. The data, which
Crime risk file were collected in several large American cit-
rectangular file structure ies, provide information Useful for evaluating
354 cases the activities of the Guardian Angels from the
approximately 15-18 variables perspectives of transit riders, residents, mer-
80-unit-long record chants, an~ ~olice officers. Respondents who
24 records per case were transit riders ware asked to provide infor-
mation on their knowledge of and contacts
Part 2 with the Angels~ attitudes toward the group,
Drug use file opinions regarding the benefits and effective-
rectangular file structure ness of the group, and law enforcement expe-
354 cases riences. Data for residents and merchants in-
approximately 15-18 variables ciude demographic characteristics, general
80-unit-long record prob!ems in the neighborhood, opinions re-
24 records per case garding crime problems, crime prevention ac-
tivities, fear of crime, knowledge of the An-
g.el~, ~ttitudes toward the group, and
Part 3
Illegal income file Victimization experiences. Class IV
rectangular file structure
354 cases Universe: Part 1: Transit riders in Boston, Chi-
24 variables cago, Cleveland, and New York City. Part 2:
80-unit-long record Patrol officers in Boston, Chicago Dalias
3 records per case New York City, Sacramento, and San Fr~
cisco. Part 3: Housing units in an area of 86
Related Publications: city blocks in downtown San Diego. Part 4:
Nurco, David N., Ira H. Cisin, and John C Ball Businesses in the downtown San Diego area
"Crime as a source of income for narc~tic that were open between 7 and 11 p.m.
addicts." Journal of Substance Abuse
Treatment 2 (1985), 113-115. Sampling: Part 1: Convenience sample of pa-
Shaffer, John W., et al. trol officers present for duty on date of survey.
"Th~ frequency of non-narcotic drug use
Part 3: Random sampling of housing units.
and its relationship to criminal activity Respondents were selected from within se-
among IlCl!'cotic addicts." Comprehensive lected housing units. Part 4: Random selec-
Psychiatry26:6 (1985), 558-566. tion of businesses.
Shannon, Lyle W.
Community studies 23
cohort, and decade the contact occurred. gated and merged to produce nelghborhood-
Class IV level data on disorder, crime, fear, residential
satisfaction, and other key factors In commu-
Universe: Persons In RacIne, WisconsIn born nity decline. The 40 neighborhoods studied
In 1942, 1949 and 1955. were located In Atlanta, Chicago, Houston,
Newark, Philadelphia, and San Francisco.
SampHng: The sample population included Variables in the data file Include: (1) disorder
6.127 persons from three birth cohorts (1942, characteristics such as loitering, drugs, van-
1949, and 1955). dalism, noise, and gang actiVity, (2) demo-
graphic characteristics such as race, age,
Note: The files are contact-by-contact data and unemployment rate, and (3) neighbor-
flies, that Is, the contact (not the person) Is hood crime problems such as burglary, rob-
the unit of analysis. Each contact becomes a bery, assault, and rape. Information is also
record. There can be multiple records (con- available on crime avoidance behavIors, fear
tacts) per Individual. Each Individual is identi- of crime on an aggregated scale, neighbor·
fied by the variable called UID (Unique Identi- hood satisfaction on an aggregated scale,
fication Number). and cohesion and social interaction. Class IV
Community studies 25
riods of incarceration, and the respondents' and residing In Brooklyn during July and Au-
demographic characteristics. The labor mar- gust, 1979. A sub-sample of 152 respondents
ket Information, which was obtalned through was re-Intervlewed In 1980.
Interviews at the tima of the respondents' ar-
rests, spans a two-year period prior to those Extent of collection: 1 data file
arrests. Prior arrest history and other criminal
justice data cover the two years prior to arrest Card Image data format
and one year following the arrest. Additional
variables Include: employment and occupa- rectangular file structure
tional data, social and neighborhood charac- 902 cases
teristics, and information on perceptions of 541 variables
the risk of committing selected crimes. This 80-unlt·long record
study Is valuable because it examines the em- 19 records per case
pirical relationship between crime and em-
ployment at three points In time: two years Related Publications:
prior to arrest, at the time of arrest, and a Sullivan, M., and J.W. Thompson
year following arrest. Class IV ·Youth crime and employment patterns In
three Brooklyn neighborhoods." New York,
Universe: All males arrested for felony of- NY: Vera Institute of Justice, 1984.
fenses and residing In Brooklyn during July Svlrldoff, M., and J. McElroy
and August 1979. "Employment and crime: A summary re-
port." New York, NY: Vera Institute of Jus-
Sampling: The sample consists of 902 males tice, 1984.
arrested predominantly for felony offenses
Corrections - adult 27
of education, and state of Incarceration. Crimi- Bureau of Justice Statistics,
nal history data Include prior felony convic- U.S. Department of Justice
tions for criminal homicide and legal status at
the time of the capital offense. Additlonallnfor- Capital punishment In the United
matlon Is provided on those Inmates removed States, 1973·1989
from death row by yearend 1988 and those In-
mates who were executed. Class II (ICPSR 9507)
Universe: Inmates In state prisons throughout Summary: This data collection provides an-
the United States under the sentence of nual data on prisoners under a sentence of
death. death and on those whose offense sentences
were commuted or vacated during the period
Note: Information collected prior to 1972 Is In 1973-1989. Information Is supplied on basic
many cases Incomplete and reflects vestiges soclodemographlc characteristics such as
In the reporting process. Names of Inmates age, sex, race and ethnlclty, marital status at
have been removed from the files for reasons time of Imprisonment, level of education, and
of confidentiality. The Inmate Identification state of Incarceration. Criminal history data In-
numbers were assigned by the Bureau of clude prior felony convictions for criminal
Census and have no purpose outside this homicide and legal status at the time of the
data collection. capital offense. Additional Information Is ave:;·
able for those Inmates removed from death
Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine- row by yearend 1989 and for those Inmates
readable documentation + SPSS control who were executed. Class II
cards
Universe: All Inmates on death row since
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with 1972 In the United States.
SPSS control cards
Note: Information collected prior to 1972 Is In
Part 1 many cases incomplete and reflects vestiges
Current file In the reporting process. Names of Inmates
rectangular file structure have been removed from the files for reasons
2,263 cases of confidentiality. The Inmate Identification
36 variables numbers were assigned ;y the Bureau of the
64-unit-long r&cord Census and have no purpose outside this
1 record per case data collection.
Corrections - adult 29
porting program In Which each state, the Dis- contalns all three of these record types. Parts 2
trict of Columbia, and the Federal Bureau of through 4 contaln the Individual record types.
Prisons reported summary statlstics as part of
the statistical Information on prison popula- Extent of collection: 4 data files + machine-
tions In the United States. Class" readable documentation + SPSS control cards
Note: This data collection preserves What OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with
was reported In the historical record. No at- SPSS control cards for each
tempts were made to correct any errors that
may have existed In the record. Part 1
Prison admissions and releases, parole
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- releases
readable documentation + SPSS control rectangular file structure
cards. 327,157 eases
95 variables
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with 233-unlt-long record
SPSS control cards for each 4 records per case
rectangular file structure Part 2
54 cases Prison admissions
126 variables rectangular file structure
923-unlt-long record 140,200 cases
14 records per case 95 variables
233-unlt-long record
Related Publications: 4 records per case
Bureau of Justice Statistics
"Historical statistics on prisoners In state Part 3
and federal Institutions, yearend 1925- Prison release
1986: Washington, DC: U.S. Government rectangular file structure
Printing Office, May 1988. 130,531 cases
Bureau of Justice Statistics 95 variables
"Historical Corrections Statistics In the 233-unlt-long record
United States, 1850-1984." Washington, 4 records per case
DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, De-
cember 1986. Part 4
Parole releases
rectangular file structure
56,426 cases
95 variables
Bureau of Justice Statistics, 233-unlt-long record
U.S. Department of Justice 4 records per case
National corrections reporting
program, 1983: [United states]
(lCPSR 8363) Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S, Department of Justice
Summary: This study was conducted to pro-
vide a cons:stent and comprehensive descrip- National corrections reporting
tion of convicted persons' entrances Into and program, 1984: [United states]
departures from correctional custody and cor-
rectional supervision. In order to accomplish (ICPSR 8497)
this goal, data were gathered on prison ad-
missions, prison releases, and paroie re- Summary: In 1983 the National Prisoners Sta-
leases. Class" tistics program on admissions and releases
(NPS) and the Uniform Parole Reports (UPR)
Universe: All sentenced persons who were were combined Into one reporting system, the
admitted to and/or released from a state National Corrections Reporting Program
prison system. (NCRP)_ The NCRP evolved from the need to
Improve and consolidate data on corrections
Note: This dataset Is available In four parts at the national leVel. Its objective Is to provide
containing racords on prison admissions, a consistent and comprehensive description
prison releases, and parole releases. Part 1 of prisoners entering and leaving the custody
Part 2
Prison releases
rectangular file structure
195,071 cases
103 variables
35g-unlt-long record
1 record per case
Corrections - adult 31
Part 3 that had been Identified In the National Jail
Parole releases Census, 1970, and were stili In existence In
rectangular file structure 1972. There are 3,580 records, one for each
96,637 cases jail. Data Include: number of Inmates held,
103 variables types of accommodations, number of dlfferElf1t
359-unlt-long record types of staff personnel, procedures for sEl!:ire-
1 record per case gating certain types of Inmates, selected facili-
ties, and programs and services. National JaJl
Censuses were also conducted In 1970
(ICPSR 7641) and In 1978 (ICPSR 7737).
Data and documentation were prepared by
Bureau of Justice Statistics, the Center for Advanced Computation, Univer-
U.S. Department of Justice sity of Illinois, Urbana. Class II
National Jail census, 1970
Related Publication:
(ICPSR 7641) "The nation's jails." Washington, D.C.:
U.S. Government Printing Office, Stock
The study was conducted for the National No. 02'1-000-00326-5.
Criminal Justice Informc:tlon and Statistics
Service by the Government's Division of the
United States Bureau of the Census. Coun-
ties and municipalities with a 1960 population Bureau of Justice Statistics,
of 1,000 or more were surveyed to determine
the presence of ajall. Data were collected for U.S. Department of Justice
jalls which were operated by the local jurisdic- National Jail census, 1978
tion and which confined Inmates for 48 hours
or more. There are data for 4,037 local jails. (ICPSR 7737)
Data Include jail population by reason being
held, age (juvenile or adult) and sex, maxi- The National jail census was conducted In
mum sentence that can be served in the fecll- early 1978 by the U.S. Bureau of the Census
ity, type of security available, facility capacity, for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The Cen-
age, construction and renovation of the facil- sus was taken of all locally administered
ity, employment, and operating expenditures. county and municipal jalls which had the
National Jail Censuses were also conducted authority to hold prisoners more than 48
In 1972 (ICPSR 7638) and in 1978 (ICPSR hours. Data are presented for 3,493 Jails In
7737). Data and documentation were pre- 45 states. Excluded are Connecticut, Dela-
pared by the Center for Advanced Computa- ware, HawaII, Rhode Island, and Vermont. In-
tion, University of illinois, Urbana. Class /I formation Includes Jail population by legal
status, age and sex of prisoners, maximum
Related Publication: sentence, admissions and releases, available
Bureau of Justice Statistics services, str~ture and capacity, expenditure,
"Local jails: A report presenting data for in- and employment. Class II
dividual county and city jails from the 1970
National Jail Census." Washington, D.C.:
U.S. Government Printing Office, Stock
No. 2700-00178.
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice
National Jail census, 1983
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
(ICPSR 8203)
U.S. Department of Justice
National jail census, 1972 The National Jail census was conducted by
the U.S. Census Bureau for the Bureau of
(ICPSR 7638) Justice Statistics. The Census was taken of
all locally administered county and municipal
Formerly: Survey of inmates of local j1.'ils: jails which had the authority to hold prisoners
institutional data, 1972. The survey was for more than 48 hours. Data are presented
conducted for the National Criminal Justice In- for 3,338 Jails in 45 states. Excluded are Con-
formation and Statistics Service by the Demo- necticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Rhode Island,
graphic Survey Division, United States Bu- and Vermont. Information includes Jail popula-
reau of the Census. The survey covers jails tion by legal status, age and sex of prisoners,
Corrections· adult 33
Part 2 Part 2
Jurisdiction-level Jurisdiction-level data
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
874 cases 868 cases
170 variables 174 variables
1,820-unlt-long record 695-unit-long record
1 record per case 11 records per case
Summary: This data collection provides an- Summary: This data collection provides an-
nual data on Jail populations across the nation nual data on Jail populations across the nation
and examines the ·spillover" effect on local and examines the ·spillover" effect on local
Jails resulting from the dramatic growth In Fed- Jails resulting from the dramatic growth in fed-
eral and state prison populations. These data eral and state prison populaticns. These data
permit an assessment of the demands placed permit an assessment of the demands placed
on correctional resources. Information Is avail- on correctional resources and provide a com-
able on the number of Inmates by sex, race, piete picture of the adult correctional system
adult or Juvenile status, reason being held, and the changes that occur In that system. In-
and cause of death. Class II formation is available on the number of in-
mates by sex, race, adult or juvenile status, rea-
Universe: All city and county Jails in the son being held, c:nd cause of death. Class II
United States.
Sampling: A stratified simple random sample
Sampling: A stratified simple random sample of jurisdictions stratified by the average daily
of jurisdictions stratified by the average daily population (ADP) as reported by the National
population (ADP) as reported by the National Jail Census, 1983.
Jail Census, 1983.
Note: The Census Bureau used a nine-digit
Note: The Census Bureau used a 9-digit Gov- Government Identification number In order to
ernment Identification number in order 10 uni- Identify each jail uniquely. Due to restrictions
quely identify each Jail. Due to restrictions in in OSIRIS, this variable has been broken up
OSiRIS, this variable has been broken up into Into four different variables. Users of the data
four different variables. Users of the data will will have to combine these four variables in or-
have 10 combine these four variables in order der to identify a particular Jail.
to identify a particular jail.
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine- readable documentation + SPSS control
readable documentation + SPSS control cards
cards
OSIRIS and card image data formats, with
OSIRIS and card image data formats, with SPSS control cards for each
SPSS control cards for each
rectangular file structure
Part 1 866 cases
Jail-level data 176 variables
rectangular file structure 1,660-unit-long record
1,137 cases 21 records per case
176 variables
740-unit-long record
12 records per case
Corrections - adult 35
whereas this study examines a variety of fac- Bureau of Justice Statistics,
tors, Including length of Incarceration, age, U.S. Department of Justice
sex, race, prior arrest record, prosecutions,
length of time between parole and rearrest, Survey of Inmates of local jails, 1983:
parolees not prosecuted for new offenses but [United States]
having their parole revoked, rearrests in
states other than the paroling states, and the (ICPSR 8274)
nature and location of rearrest charges. Parol-
ees In the 22 states covered In this study, ac- Data for the Survey of Inmates of Local Jails,
count for 50 percent of all state prisoners pa- 1983 were collected by the Bureau of the
roled In the United States In 1978. Class II Census for the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
The 5,785 respondents were selected from a
Universe: Population of offenders aged 18 to universe of 3,600 Institutions housing
22, released from prison to parole supervision. 190,000 male and 13,000 female Inmates.
The sample Included 400 Institutions, 4,300
Sampling: Random selection, or stratified male and 1,800 female Inmates. The survey
sampling, or all persons paroled, depending consists of Information regarding socioeco-
on the state, selected to ensure maximum nomic characteristics and demographics of re-
coverage. spondents; previous military service; prior
criminal hlstory;jall activities; drug and alco-
Note: This data collection Is hierarchically hol use; health care; and current offenses.
structured with two levels. The first level con- There are 1,040 variables In the dataset,
tains Uniform Parole Report data and has a which has a logical record length of 1,850
logical record length of 354, 49 variables, and characters. Class II
4,002 records. The second level contains re-
cord of arrest and prosecution and has a logi-
cal record length of 354, 169 variables, and
22,192 records. Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Restrictions: For certain variables, the data U.S. Department of Justice
have been masked In order to maintain the Survey of Inmates of state correctional
confidentiality of respondents participating in facilities, 1979
social science research.
(ICPSR 7856)
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machlne-
readable documentation Designed by the Bureau of Justice Statistics
and conducted by the Bureau of the Census,
OSIRIS data format this survey was one of a series of data-gather-
ing efforts undertaken during the 1970's to as-
hierarchical file structure sist policymakers in assessing the nation's
354·unit-long record correctional Institutions and in formulating
measures to overcome any deficiencies. Un-
Related Publications: der the terms of the Crime Control Act of
illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority 1976, the Law Enforcement Assistance Ad-
"The pace of recidivism in Illinois." Re- ministration (LEAA) was authorized by Con-
search Bulletin (Number 2, April 1986) . gress to survey existing and future needs in
Klein, S. and M. Caggiano federal, state, and local correctional facilities.
"The prevalence, predictability, and policy The Survey of Inmates of State Correctional
Irnplications of recidivism.· Santa Monica, Facilities gathered extensive information on
CA: Rand Corporation, 1986. demographic, socioeconomic, and criminal
Delaware Statistical Analysis Center history characteristics. Also obtained were de-
"Recidivism in Delaware - A study of rear- tails of inmates' military service records such
rest after release from incarceration.· De- as time of service and branch of service, eligi-
cember, 1984. bility for benefits, type of discharge, and con-
tact with veterans' groups. Other variables In-
clude age, ethnicity, education, life-time drug
use, drinking pattern prior to arrest, prior Incar-
ceration record, and prearrest annual/ncome.
All information was provided by Inmates who
participated in personal Interviews on a volun-
tary basis. The data comprised of 993 vari-
ables are in a single file with 11,397 records
Corrections - adult 37
Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine- Related Publication:
readable documentation National Criminal Justice Information and Sta·
tlstics Service
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with ·Survey of local Jails, Advance report. Na-
SPSS control cards for each tional prisoner statistics special report."
Part 1
Survey of Inmates of state correctional
facilities, 1974
rectangular file structure Bureau of Justice Statistics,
9,040 cases U.S. Department of Justice
432 variables SU/vey of jail Inmates, 1978
746-unlt-long record
11 records per case (ICPSR 7751)
Corrections - adult 39
Austin, James Note: Names of Inmates were blanked for rea-
sons of confidentiality. The unit of observation
Prison crowding and forced releases for Part I, the Inmate Jacket File, Is the Indlvid-
In illinois, 1979·1982 uallnmate, while the unit of observation for
the Arrest Rap Sheet file Is the arrest.
(ICPSR 8921)
Extent of collection: 2 data flies
This study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- logical record length data format
tice. The gra1t number Is 83-IJ-CX-K026.
Part 1
Summary: These data were collected In the Inmate jacket
illinois prison system where, In response to a rectangular file structure
prison overcrowding crisis, approximately two- 1,557 cases
thirds of the Inmates released by the illinois 94 variables
Department of Corrections (IDOC) were dis- 310-unlt-long reocrd
charged prior to serving their expected sen- 1 record per case
tences. This study was designed to evaluate
the eifoots of an early release program on Part 2
prisoners, prison populations, offense rates, Arrest rap sheet
local criminal just!ce systems, and the gen- rectangular file structure
eral public. The files oontaln extensive Fed- 17,361 cases
eral Bureau of Inve~tigation arrest history In- 22 variables
formation and oth~r personal and social 70-unlt-long record
Indicators describ~ng Inmates released from 1 record per case
the state prison system. Data are available
for three comparison groups: (1) a sample of Related Publication:
prisoners who served their regular sentences AUstin, James, Barry Krlsberg, and Paul
prior to the "forced release" program, (2) a Kitsky
group that served regular sentences after im- "Using early release to relieve prison
plementation of the program, and (3) a group crowding: A dilemma In public policy."
of Inmates who were released early under the CrIme and Delinquency 32 (1984), 405-
program (i.e., before serving their full sen- 502.
tences). The "Inmate jacket file," which Is the
comprehensive Institutional file malntalned for
all Inmates, contalns variables for each In-
mate on social and personal characteristics,
criminal conduct, prior release and return re- Austin, James and Barry Krisberg
cords, method of release, condition of supervi-
sion, and parole violation records. The arrest Differential use of Jail confinement In
file Includes variables which describe the type San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Yolo
and number of charges at arrest, case dispo- counties, 1981
sition of each charge, probation length, Incar-
ceration length, admission and release dates, (ICPSR 8920)
and release type. Class IV
This study was sponsored by the United States
Universe: Inmates released from Illinois pris- Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
ons between July 1979 and December 1982. tice. The grant number Is 81-IJ-CX-0008.
Sampling: A total of 1,600 Inmates was ran- Summary: This study provides detailed infor-
domly selected from the IDOC automatic in- mation on inmate characteristics, length of
formation system's records of Inmates re- time in jail, methods of release, conditions of
leased between July 1979 and December release, disciplinary violations, and types of
1982. Of these, Inmate jackets were located program participation while In Jail. The file con-
for 1,557 cases and arrest history information tains variables for each Inmate, including in-
was available for 1,430 of the cases. Of the formation about inmates' demographic char-
1,557 Inmates included in the study, 355 were acteristics, current offenses, prior records
released prior to June 1, 1980. The remaining confinement conditions, disciplinary prob.'
1,202 inmates were released during the op- lems, and nature and time of disposition.
eration of the program. Not all of these were Class IV
early releases. Some Inmates served their
normal expected sentences. Universe: Sentenced and unsentenced In-
mates of jails in three California counties:
Corrections - adult 41
19S0 and 1982, Including those defendants Part 5
who were unable to gain pretrial release due Merged intake and release
to seriousness of their prior records, but were rectan:.iular file structure
judged by the court to be suitable for release 1,672 C'3.ses
with supervision. Of these, 1,692 cases en- 141 variables
tered the experimental program. (2) Arrest SO-unlt-Iong record
Data Base: A sample of 245 arrests Involving 15 records per case
205 SPR defendants during the experimental
period was drawn. (3) Retrospective Data Part 6
Base: A random sample of approximately 400 Arrest data
felony defendants drawn from booking logs in rectangular file structure
each site for 19S0 and again for 19S1 was se- 245 cases
lected. The 1980 sample was drawn from a 115 varlabl es
list of 1,25S defenclants In the 12-month pe- SO.unit·long record
riod prior to the project start-up. The 1981 11 records per case
sample was selected from 1,040 defendants
in the 12-month period the SPR program was Parts 7 and S
in operation. This sample provides baseline Retrospective data and duplicated
data that can be compared with the SRIS da- retrospective data
tabase. (4) Jail Population Data Base: This rectangular file structure
sample consists of monthly observation for 2,415 and 2S cases
periods of time that vary by site. For Miami 52 variables
the dates were January 1979 to October SO·unlt·long record
1981, for Milwaukee, December 1979 to Au- 5 records per case
gust 1981, and for Portland, January 19S0 to
November 1981. Part 9
Miami jail data
Note: The unit of observation for the Super- rectangular file structure
vised Release Information (SRIS) and the 34 cases
Retrospective Data Base Is the defendant. 9 variables
The unit of observation for the Arrest Data SO·unlt·long record
Base Is the arrest, and the unit of observation 1 record per case
for the Jail Population Data Base Is the
month. Not all of the flies provided by the prin- Part 10
cipal Investigators are completely docu- Milwaukee jail data
mented. Also, the number of records for rectangular file structure
some files Is greater than the number ex- 20 cases
pected for unkown reasons. For three of the 4 variables
files, a separate file Is provided with duplicate SO-unit·long record
records only. 1 record per case
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States Universe: Adults, aged 16 or older, arrested In
Depf;lrtment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- the general aleas of New York state for the of-
tice. The grmt number Is 81-IJ-CX·0014. fenses of murder, rape, robbery, aggravated
assault, or burglary and for larceny or auto
Summary: The National Institute of Justice theft In Albany or Erie counties.
sponsored this study of 1,065 prison Inmates
In louisIana, PennsylvanIa, and WashIngton. Note: The data are organized hierarchically In
Respondents were adminIstered an aca- two levels: (1) a person record, and (2) one or
demic achievement test and an indlvldualln- more arrest records. Each of the two data
telllgence test. Two screening tests were also files has a variable number of records per
given to certain respondents. Testing was case. The number of records Is dependent on
completed between January 1982 and Janu- the number of arrests an offender had. There
ary 1983. Specifically, the following seven are 14 variables and 129,010 cases at the
:Jroups of variables were examined: 1, Demo- person level, and 16 variables and 12,555
graphic variables: age, sex, race, employ- cases at the arrest level.
ment history, physical condition. 2. Criminal
Justice variables: offenses committed, prior in- Extent of collection: 2 data files
stitutionalization, juvenile adjudication. 3. Edu-
cational background variables: years of for- Logical record length data format
mal education, academic and vocational
participation while Incarcerated, previous diag- Part 1
noses, and prior tlilst results. 4. Family back- Arrests for serious crimes
ground variables: childhood home situation, hierarchical file structure
death of parents, number of siblings, child-
hood problems. 5. Academic achievement Part 2
variables: as measured by the Tests of Basic Arrests for larceny or auto theft
Education. 6. Ability variables: as measured hierarchical file structure
by the Wechsler Adult [ntelllgence Scale-Re-
vised. 7. Disability variables: as measured by
the Mann-Suiter Disabilities Screening Test.
The data are contained in one file that has a Bradshaw, Richard Anred
logical record length of 100 characters. Class IV
Cross-validation of the Iowa offender
risk assessment model In Michigan,
1980-1982
Blumstein, A~red and Jacqueline Cohen (lCPSR 9236)
Adult criminal careers In New York,
1972-1\983 ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Justice, Nationallnstnute of Jus-
(ICPSR 9353) tice. The grant number is 85-IJ·CX-0Q35.
Summary: This data collection was designed Summary: These data were collected in an at-
to estimate the extent and variation of crimi- tempt to cross-validate the 1984 and 1985
nal offenses by crime type, race, age, and versions of the Iowa model for assessing risk
of offending while on parole by applying the
Corrections - adult 43
model to a Michigan sample of male parolees Goodstein, Lynne, John H. Kramer, John
over a follow·up period of two and one·haIf R. Hepburn, and Doris L MacKenzie
years. Different measures of predictors such
as prior criminal history, current offense, sub· Effects of determinant sentencing on
stance abuse history, age, and recidivism on Institutional climate and prison
parole are available. The first file contains In· administration: Connecticut,
formation on parolees such as demographic Minnesota, ""nols, 1981·1983
characteristics, drug use history, prior criminal
history, risk scores, and parole history. The (ICPSR 8278)
second file Includes parolees' detailed crimi·
naI histories Including the total number of vlo· This study was sponsored by the United States
lent and nonviolent felony arrests and dates, Department of Justice, NatIonal Instnute of Jus-
and charges and dispositions of each arrest tice. The grant number Is SO·NI-AX-COO6.
with a maximum of eight arrests. Class IV
Summary: The effects of determinant sen-
Universe: Male parolees In tho state of Michl· tencing on prison climate and administratIon
gan In 1980. are examined In this data collection. Three
data collection periods are Included In the da-
Sampling: A random sample of 676 male pa. taset, and there are nIne flies. The first three
rolees was selected from the population of tiles contain data taken from a total random
4,084 Inmates released on parole by the sample of offenders housed at five prisons.
Michigan Parole Department during calendar File one was taken from the first data collec-
year 1980. tion period, file two from the second, and file
three from the thIrd data collectIon period.
Extent of collection: 2 data files The fourth file Is an additional sample from
the state of Connecticut of those Inmates
Card Image data format serving determinate sentences, collected dur-
Ing the third period of data collection. The fifth
Part 1 file Is indeterminate sample data from data
Parolees file collection periods one and two while the sixth
rectangular file structure file is indeterminate panel sample data taken
676 cases from collection period three. The seventh and
38 variables eighth files are determinate panel sample
80·unit-long record data from collection periods one and two, re-
1 record per case spectively. The ninth and final file is determi-
nate panel sample data from collectlon period
Part 2 three. There were six questionnaires used In
Crimes file collecting these data. The following Issues
rectangular file structure are covered In the questionnaires: inmates'
617 cases feelings about their arrest, court case, and
112 variables conviction, feelings about the law, physical
80-unlt-long record problems developed during prison term, how
6 records por case time Is spent In prison, family contacts outside
prison, relationships with other prisoners and
Related Publication: staff (guards), Involvement In prison pro·
Bradshaw, R.A. grams, and crlm!nal history. Each file has 550
"Multlvariate actuarial predletlon of felonl· records. The logical record length of each file
ous recidivism of male parolees: Compara· Is 80. Class IV
tlve cross-validation of two risk assess-
ment models on a Michigan sample.·
Unpublished dissertation, Michigan State
University, 1986.
Harper, Dean
Crime and mental disorder, 1972
(ICPSR 9088)
Corrections - adult 45
ant experience In the data file. Each record from 75 percent of the mainline Inmates out of
represents one experience, so It Is possible a population of 25,838 male felons.
for an Individual probationer to have multiple
records. There are 16 variables per case. All Extent of collection: 6 data files + machine-
three files have logical record lengths of 80 readable documentation
characters. Class IV
Card Image data format
Part 1
Census
Holeman, Herbert and Barbara J. rectangular file structure
Krepps-Hess 386 cases
Women correctional officers In 31 variables
80-unlt-long record
California, 1979 1 record per case
(ICPSR 8684)
Part 2
This study was sponsored by the United States Staff
Depa1ment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- rectangular file structure
tice. The grant number Is 79-NI-AX-0006. 241 cases
49 variables
Summary: This study examines women cor- 80-unit·long record
rset/onal officers working In California's male 1 record per case
institutions, focusing on three aspects: (1)
demographic characteris~cs of the female offi- Part 3
cers, (2) assessments of their ability to per- Inmate
form the jobs, and (3) attitudes of male and fe- rectangular file structure
male officers and inmates about female 400 cases
correctional officers. Class IV 41 variables
80·unit-long record
Universe: Male and female correctional offl- 1 record per case
cers and felons in 11 California male inmate
Institutions. Part 4
Profile
Sampling: Three different samples were col- rectangular file structure
lectl;ld: (1) A department-wide census that In- 252 cases
cluded every female corrootional officer work- 32 variables
Ing in the 11 California male inmate 80-unit·long record
institutions. This Includes baseline data for 1 record per case
386 female correctional officers. (2) Job per-
formance data from 168 female correctional Part 5
officers was matched (using age and job ten- Female
ure) with 168 male correctional officers. Only rectangular file structure
seven of the 11 Institutions were used since 168 cases
four of the Institutions employed less than 24 53 variables
female officers. For this reason, 24 women BO-unlt-Iong record
and 24 men were selected from each of 1 record per case
these seven institutions. For those institutions
employing more than 24 women officers, a Part 6
random digit table was used to select 24 Male
women. (3) Survey responses were gathered rectangular file structure
from structured attitude questionnaires given 168 cases
to 182 male and 59 female correctional offi- 53 variables
cers and 400 Inmates from seven Institutions. 80-unit·long record
For the officer sample, a proportionate strati- 1 record per case
fied random sample was conducted, using
the seniority listing of correctional officers.
The sample was stratified by sex and Institu-
tion so It would be representative of all correc-
tional officers In California Within each strata,
10 percent of the officers were selected. For
the inmate sarrlple, the selection Was made
Corrections - adult 47
Part 2 Part 9
Sandhills inmat') enrollment Inmate recidivism file
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
591 cases 157 cases
153 variables 80 variables
1,085-unlt-long record 595-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 3 Part 10
Polk/Harne" inmate enrollment file Inmate probation record file
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
236 cases 1,108 cases
88 variables 752 variables
590-unlt-long record 2,948-unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 4 Part 11
Inmate post release file Inmate jail education file
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
925 cases 815 cases
60 variables 130 variables
445-unit-long record 936-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 5 Part 12
Inmate unemployment file Inmate arrest file
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
31 cases 6,012 cases
102 variables 10 variables
415-unlt-long record 66-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 6 Part 13
County crime rate file Inmate wage data file
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
100 cases 533 cases
7 variables 45 variables
56-unit-long record 336-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Corrections - adult 49
Mande, Mary J. Part 2
Iowa data
Validation of the Rand selective rectangular file structure
Incapacitation survey and the Iowa 1,069 cases
risk assessment scale In Colorado, 157 variables
1982 and 1986 129-unit-long record
4 records per case
(lCPSR 9292)
Related Publications:
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States Mande, Mary J., and Kim English
Depa1ment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- "Estimating individual offending rates in
tice. The grait number Is 84-IJ-CX-0034. Colorado." Washington, DC: Unpublished
final report submitted to the National Insti-
Summary: This data collection was designed tute of Justice, 1987.
to replicate the Rand Selective Incapacitation Mande, Mary J., and Kim English
SUrvey and the Iowa Risk Assessment Scale "Validation of the Iowa assessment scale
using a group of Colorado offenders. The on a 1982 release cohort of Colorado In-
Iowa model provides two assessments of of- mates: Washington, DC: Unpublished fi-
fender risk: (1) a measure of general risk to nal report submitted to the Nationallnsti-
society and (2) a measure of the risk of new tute of Justice, 1988.
violence. The Iowa dataset Includes crime in-
formation from defendants' self-reports and
from official crime records. Both files contain
important self-report items such as perceived
probability of being caught, weapon used in Manpower Demonstration Research
the offense committed, months free on the Corporation
street during the reference period, and de- National supported work evaluation
tailed activity description during the free pe-
riod. Other items covered Include employ- study, 1975-1979: Public use files
ment history, plans, reasons for committing (ICPSR 7865)
the crime, and attitudes toward life, lem, pris-
ons, and police. Class IV The National Supported Work Demonstration
(of which this study Is an evaluation) was a
Universe: Incoming male inmates and re- transitional, subsidized work experience pro-
leased inmates in Colorado. gram for four target groups of people with
longstanding employment problems: ex-of-
Sampling: The sample for replicating the fenders, former drug addicts, women who are
Rand study was an incoming cohort of 313 long term recipients of welfare benefits, and
males sentenced to the Colorado Department school dropouts, many with criminal records.
of Corrections in 1986. Inmates housed at the For four years, at 15 locations across the
Reception and Diagnostic Unit were selected country, the program provided up to 12 to 18
first from an alphabetical list and later by loca- months of employment to a total of about
tion of cell block. Inmates backlogged at COlKlty 10,000 individuals. In ten of these sites-At-
jails Wf1:e systematically selected from a list. lanta, Chicago, Hartford, Jersey City, Newark,
The sample for validation of the Iowa model New York, Philadelphia, Oakland, San Fran-
was selected from all Inmates released from cisco and Wisconsln-6,600 eligible appli-
prison in 1982 who had been sentenced in the cants were randomly assigned either to ex-
districts of Denvf1:, Jefff1:son, EI Paso, or Mesa perimental groups (offered a job in supported
These districts were selected because of their work) arlo control groups, and an evaluation
well-maintained criminal records. was conducted on the effects of the Sup-
ported Work program. At the time of enroll-
Extent of collection: 2 data files ment, each respondent was given a retrospec-
tive baseline intf1:View, generally covering the
Logical record length data format previous two years, which was followed by up
to four follow-up Interviews scheduled at nine-
Part 1 month intervals. Each interview collected data
Rand data on demographic characteristics, ernployment
rectangular file structure history, job search, mobility, household in-
313 cases come, housing, and respondent's drug use.
584 variables AFDC recipients were further asked about
931-unit-long record children in school and welfare participation,
1 record per case while all non-AFDC respondents were ques-
Marsden, Mary Ellen and Thomas Orsagh Summary: Felons In the California prison sys-
tem are documented In this data collection.
Matching treatment and offender: Information is provided for each felon who
North Carolina, 1980·1982 was committed to the Department of Correc-
tions, returned to prison as a parole violator,
(ICPSR 8515) paroled, suspended from or reinstated on pa-
role, discharged, or who died or was exe-
This study was sponsored by the United States cuted from January 1, 1945 through Decem-
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- ber 31, 1964. The df.ta are arranged by year
tice. The gT~t number Is 81-IJ-CX-0061. and type of movement. Each record contains
Information on certain characteristics of the
Summary: The purpose of this data collection person involved, such as age at admission,
was to evaluate the implications of rational race, marital status, education, military his-
choice theory for offender rehabilitation. The tory, occupation, number of prior arrests, es-
hypothesis of the research was that income- cape record, date and type of releases, and
enhancing prison rehabilitation programs are parole violations. Class IV
most effective for the economically motivated
offender. The offender was characterized by Note: All files are rectangular, with logical re-
demographic and socioeconomic charac- cord lengths of 50 characters, and one record
teristics, criminal history and behavior, and per case. There are approximately 55 variables
work activities during Incarceration. Informa- in each file. Prisoner serial numbers have been
tion was also collected on type of release and extrooted for reasons of confidentiality.
postrelease recidivistic and labor market
measures. Recidivism was measured by ar- Extent of collection: 128 data files
rests, convictions, and reincarcerations after
release, length of time Until first arrest after re- Logical record length data format
lease, and seriousness of offense leading to
incarceration. Class IV Admissions to prison
17 female (1945-54. 1959-64).3 male (1945.
Sampling: Males who had been in prison at 1957,1964) files
least six months, who had not been out of 87-368 female, 1,950-5,010 male cases
prison for significant periods of time during
their recent incarcerations, and who had been
released into North Carolina.
Corrections - adult 51
Parole releases sonalincome, mobility, and drug treatment, if
16 female (1945-55, 1959-64),3 male (1945, any. There are four files In the data collection,
1957,1964) files each one containing 5,438 card-Image re-
50-560 female, 1,560-7,230 male cases cords. Class IV
Suspension of parole
16 female (1945-55, 1959-61, 1963-64),
2 male (1957, 1964) files Palumbo, Dennis J., Michael Musheno,
1-487 female, 1,170-4,230 male cases
and Steven Maynard-Moody
Reinstatement of parole Implementation of community
2 female (1963-64), 2 male (1957, 1964) files corrections In Oregon, Colorado, and
150-167 female, 270-600 male cases
Connecticut, [1981]
Parole violator returned (ICPSR 8407)
17 female (1945-55, 1958-61, 1963-64),
2 male (1957, 1964) files This study was sponsored by the United States
15-285 female, 1,380-3,300 male cases Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number Is 82-15-CU-K015.
Institutional termination to prison
18 female (1945-55, 1958-64),2 male (1957, Summary: Data were collected from three
1964) files states to evaluate the success of community
2-25 female, 960-1,050 male cases corrections programs and to identify the condi-
tions that underlie these successes. Personal
Active parole termination field Interviews and mall questionnaires were
17 female (1945-55,1959-64),1 male (1964) files used on state, county, and district levels. The
296 female, 2,580 male cases variables in the study were designed to exam-
ine the kind of people who implement and
Inactive parole termination maintain these programs, the level of commit-
18 female (1946-47, 1953-55, 1959, 1961, ment by judicial and prison officials to these
1963-64), 1 male (1964) files programs, community support, and the goals
1-55 female, 210 male cases of cost reduction, work training, and rehabilita-
tion. The data for this collection are contained
in eight files. Three files of SPSS control
cards document the eight data files. There
Nurco, David are 920 cases in Connecticut, 3171n Colo-
rado, and 444 In Oregon. The logical record
Crime days precursors study: length of all the files Is 80 characters. Class IV
Baltimore, 1952·1976
(lCPSR 8222)
Corrections - adult 53
one for rapists and one for child molesters, Summary: This data collection focuses on
used In a Massachusetts treatment center for problems in the women's correctional system
sexually aggressive offenders. Rapists and and examines specifically the origins and de-
child molesters were classified as two types velopment of prisoner and sentencing charac-
of sex offenders and then clinically classified teristics In three states. Information Is in-
Into different subtypes based on criteria for cluded on parents' place of birth, occupation,
the two taxonomies being tested. Variables In- marital status, offense, sentence, prior com-
clude type of traffic offenses, criminal of- mitments, method of release from prison, and
fenses, and sex offenses charged. Data on presence of crime partners. Class IV
dispositions of cases are also provided along
with parole and discharge Information. Of- Sampling: Cases were Identified from official
fenders' post-release offenses were catego- prison records that included a time span of
rized into traffic offenses, non-traffic offenses ten years before and after the opening of
and sex offenses. Class IV separate women's state prisons.
Universe: All sex offender cases referred to a Universe: All women housed In State prisons
treatment center In Brldgewata-, Massachu- from 1800 to 1935.
setts for Intensive observation and then
released. Extent of collection: 1 data file
Sampling: Of the 1,500 sex offender cases Card image data format
that were referred to the treatment center In
Bridgewater, Massachusetts for intensive ob- rectangular tile structure
servation during 1982-1985, 500 ware com- 4,609 cases
mitted and became treatment patients. Of 30 variables
these patients, 270 were released after vary- 80-unit-long record
ing lengths of treatment and were selected as 3 records per case
the sample in the study.
Related Publication:
Extent of collection: 1 data file Rafter, Nicole Hahn
Partial justice: Women In state prisons,
logical record length data format 1800-1935. Boston, MA: Northeastern Uni-
versity Press, 1985.
rectangular file structure
270 cases
332 variables
2,197-unit-long record
1 record per case The Rand Corporation
Effects of prison versus probation in
Related Publications: California, 1980-1982
Prentky, R.A., and A.A. Knight
"Impulsivity in the lifestyle and criminal be- (ICPSR 8700)
havior of sexual offenders." Criminal Jus-
tice and Behavior 13 (1986), 141 -164. This study was sponsored by the United States
Knight, R.A., R. Rosenberg, and B. Schneider Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
Classification of sexual assault: A research tice. The grant number Is 83-IJ-CX-QOO2.
hancbook. New York, NY: Garlard, 1985.
Summary: This study was divided Into two
phases. The first assessed the effects of dif-
ferent sanctions on separate criminal popula-
Rafter, Nicole Hahn tions, focusing on probation as a sentencing
alternative for felons. The second phase used
Women In prison, 1800-1935: a quasi-experimental design to address how
Tennessee, New York, and Ohio imprisonment affects criminal behavior when
criminals are released. Specific Issues In-
(ICPSR 8481) cluded (a) the effect which imprisonment (vs.
probation) and length of time served have on
This study was sponsored by the United States recidivism, (b) the amount of crime prevented
Depa1ment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- by imprisoning offenders rather than placing
tice. The grant number i~ 79-NI-AX-0039. them on probation, and (e) costs to the sys-
tem for achieving that reduction in crime.
Class IV
Corrections - adult 55
Part 20: Primary survey from Module F for mlsslonsrrermlnatlons files represents data
Texas prisoner replacements on an Individual probationer. There are 84
(frequencies) variables for 1,343 cases In the Reassess-
Part 21 : Official records data for Texas ment file and 218 variables for 1,922 cases In
prisoner replacements (frequencies) the Admlsslonsffermlnations file; both files
Part 22: Survey from Modules A-E for have logical record lengths of 100 characters.
Texas jail respondents (frequencies) Of the 1,922 cases for which admissions data
Part 23: Codebook were collected (about 133 variables), 397
Part 24: SAS control cards cases also have termination data available
Part 25: Follow-up data, California 1 (an additional 85 variables). Cases In the
Part 26: Follow-up data, California 2 Chronological file are records of probation
Part 27: Follow-up data, California 3 agent contacts with probationers over the
Part 28: Follow-up data, California 4 course of the study. There are 17 variables
Part 29: Follow-up data, Michigall1 for 47,169 cases (contacts) In this file which
Part 30: Follow-up data, Michigan 2 Includes Information on 1,781 probationers.
Part 31 : Follow-up data, Michigan 3 As many as 270 contacts with a single proba-
Part 32: Follow-up data, Michigan 4 tioner are recorded. this file has a logical re-
Part 33: Follow-up data, Texas 1 cord length of 80. Class IV
Part 34: Follow-up data, Texas 2
Part 35: Follow-up data, Texas 3
Part 36: Follow-up data, Texas 4
rectangular file structure Rossi, Peter
68 to 6,883 cases per part Transitional aid research project
8 to 455 variables per part (TARP), 1976·1977
43- to 133-unlt-long records per part
1 to 10 records per case per part (ICPSR 7874)
Corrections - adult 57
Wright, James and Peter Rossi Wrlght,:<evln
Armed criminals In America: A survey Imprtwlng correctional classl1lcatJon,
of Incarcerated felons, 1983 New Y~r'hl 1981·1983
(ICPSR 8357) (ICPSR 8437)
Ttis study was sponsored by 1he United c'tates ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
Oepa1ment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grmt number Is 82-IJ-CX-OO'{ • tice. The grant number Is 83-IJCX-001.
Summary: The data for this study ~Iere col- Summary: There were three specific goals of
lected using salf-admlnlstered quesllonnalres this research. The first was to evaluate three
given to a non-probability sample of IrlCarcer- procedures currently available for the classifi-
ated felons In ten states. There are 1,874 cation of correctional Inmates: the Risk Analy-
cases (surveyed parsons) Included In this sis method, Megargee's MMPR Typology,
data collection with approximately 600 vari- and Toch's Prison Preference Inventory. Sec-
ables. Each case has 10 records of Informa- ond, the research devised and tested a post-
tion. The codebook contains information dlctlve model of adjustment to prison life,
about questionnaire wording, responses, cod- Third, a new classification scheme was devel-
Ing of the data, column location and frequen- oped for predicting Inmate adjustment to
cies. More specifically, the original question- prison life that considers Individual and organ-
naire wording Is Included as well as values for Izational (contextual) level factors and various
missing data. These data are contained In Interactions between the two. These data
one file, with SPSS control cards In a second were collected from a sample of 942 volun-
file. Information In the data Include socioeco- teer Inmates from ten New York state correc-
nomic status of the Inmate, prior criminal re- tional facilities, five of which were maximum
cord, drug use, weapon usage, family history, security five of which were medium security
and demographic Information on the Inmate. facilities. Only ona-half of the original 942 In-
The logical record length of the data file Is 89 mates completed the MMPI. Background and
characters; the SPSS control card file has 80 questionnaire data were collected during the
characters. Class IV summer and fall of 1983. Outcome data on
each Inmate Infraction were collected for a
three-year period prior to that time. Each
case In the first file represents survey re-
sponse data from an Individual Inmate. There
are 172 variables for 882 cases In this file. Of
the 172 variables, 56 are from the Prison Pref-
erence Questionnaire (PPQ), 86 are from the
Prison Environment Inventory (PEl), and the
remaining 30 are from the Prison Adjustment
Questionnaire (PAQ). Cases In the second
file are records of medical contacts and diag-
noses of Inmates' Illnesses. There are five
variables for the 12,502 cases. Class IV
Corrections - juvenile 59
Statistics Division, National Criminal Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Information and Statistics Service U.S. Department of Justice
·Chlldren In custody: Final report on the ju-
venile detention and correctional facility Juvenile detention and correctional
census of 1973." Washington, D.C.: U.S. facility census, 1975
C'lOvernment Printing Office.
(ICPSR 7707)
The Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facil- The Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facil-
iiy Census, 1982·1983 is the seventh In a se-
ity Census, 1977, is the fifth in a series of sur- ries of surveys conducted by the Bureau of
veys of state and loes! public residential facili-
the Census. It contalns information on state
ties in the juvenile justice systam. The census
and local public residential facilities which the
Corrections - juvenile 61
Juvenile Justice system operated during the fis- rectangular file structure
cal year 1982. The previous surveys covered 1,040 cases
the years 1972,1973,1974,1975,1977, and 279 variables
1979, and they are included in the ICPSR ar- 80-unlt-long record
chive. Each data record is classified into one 9 records per case
of six categories: (1) detention center; (2)
shelter; (3) reception or diagnostic center; (4)
tralning school; (5) ranch, forestry camp, or
farm; and (6) halfway house or group home.
Data Include state, county, and city identifica- Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
tion; level of government responsible for the Prevention,
facility; type of agency; agency Identification; U.S. Department of Justice
resident population by sex, age range, deten-
tion status, and offense; and admissions and Juvenile detention and correctional
departures of population. Also included in the facility census, 1986·1987: Public
data are average length of stay, staffing ex- facilities
penditures, capacity of the facility, and pro-
grams and services avallable. There are 369 (ICPSR 8973)
variables and 1,023 casas, one for each Juve-
nile detention or correctional facility. Class" Summary: The purpose of this data collection
Is to provide Information on the number and
type of juveniles placed In state and local resl·
dentlal facilities for juvenile offenders and to
facilitate the development of programs under
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency the Juvenile J:Jstice and Delinquency Preven-
Prevention and Bureau of Justice Statistics, tion Act of 1974. The collection augments in-
U.S. Department of Justice formation currently avallable on the adequacy
and needs of the nation's juvenile correctional
Juvenile detention and correctional system. Six types of public facilities are cov-
facility census, 1984·1985 ered: (1) detention centers, (2) shelters, (3) re-
ception or diagnostic centers, (4) tralnlng
(ICPSR 8495) schools, (5) ranches, forestry camps, and
farms, and (6) halfway houses and group
Summary~ This survey pfovldes information homes. Data a'I> provided in this collection on
on the characteristics and administration of ju- the number o!.· 'enlles held according to
venile detention and correctional facilities. Six age, sex, race.,::.thnlc origin, reason for cus-
types of facilities are covered: (1) detention tody, facility type, and number of staff and
centers, (2) shelters, (3) reception or diagnos- educational programs. Class IV
tic centers, (4) training schools, (5) ranches,
forestry camps, and farms, and (6) halfway Universe: All state-, county-, and city-oper-
houses and group homes. Survey items in- ated public juvenile facilities in the United
clude facility capacity, number of full-time and States. These Include residential programs
part-time staff, number of admissions and dis- and group homes that were (1) in operation
charges, average quarterly population, and on February 2,1987, (2) housed three or
expenditures by the facility. Data for facility more residents, at least 50 percent of whom
residents include age, sex, and average were juvenile, and (3) had accused or adjudi-
length of stay. Class II cated delinquents or status offenders making
up at least one percent of the dally population.
Universe: Residential facilities operated by
state and local governments as juvenile de- Extent of collection: 1 data file
tention and correctional facilities that were in
operation at the time the census was Initiated Logical record length data format
(February 1, 1984).
rectangular file struct:;re
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- 1,107 cases
readable documentation + SPSS control 600 variables
cards 6,32o-unit-long record
1 record per case
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with
SPSS control cards for each
Corrections - juvenile 63
Court case processing
-
Bureau of Justice Statistics, California. Ohio, New York, and Pennsylva-
U.S. Department of Justice nia Using the Individual adult offender as the
unit for analysis, selected Information Is pro-
Offender based transaction statistics vided about the offender and his or her arrest,
(08TS), 1979: HawaII prosecution, and court disposition. Examples
of variables Included are: arrest and level of
(ICPSR 8042) arrest charge, date of arrest, charge filed by
the prosecutor, prosecutor or grand jury dispo-
Summary: This data collection was complied sition, type of counsel, type of trial, court dis-
In order to analyze, publish, and disseminate position, sentence type, and minimum and
statistical Information concerning the opera- maximum sentence length. Dates of disposi-
tion of the criminal justice system at the fed- tion of each stage of the process allow for
eral, state, and local levels. Facts are in- tracking of time spent at each stage. In cases
cluded for an arrested offender showing where the offender is charged with multiple of-
actions by the police, prosecutor, and court. fenses, the most serious charge and most se-
The individual offender is the unit of analysis, rious outcome at each stage of the process
and felony arrests and other related disposi- (from the offender's point of view} are pro-
tions are Inclooed. Class IV vided. Individual offenders are also given
unique Identification which is consistently
Universe: Population of adults charged with used when they are involved In subsequent
felonies In Hawaii. cases, Class II
Extent of collection: 1 data file Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
readable documentation + SPSS control
Logical record length data format cards
rectangular file structure logical record length data format w~h SPSS
4,253 cases control cards
49 variables
99-unlt-loog record rectangular file structure
1 record per case 360,676 cases
60 variables
152-unlt-long record
1 record per case
Bureau of JUstice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice
Offender based transaction statistics Bureau of Justice Statistics,
(08TS), 1980: California, Ohio, New U.S. Department of Justice
York, and Pennsylvania
Offender based transaction statistics
(ICPSR 824f3) (OBTS)J 1981: California JOhlof
Pennsylvania, Utah, Minnesota, New
Summary; the Offender Based Transaction
Statistics (OBTS) consist of data which allow York, and Virginia
examination of offender characteristics and (ICPSR 8277)
patterns of court action and case disposition.
Collected by individual states from existing Summary: The Offender Based Transaction
data. the dataset includes all cases which Statistics consist of data which allow examina-
reached disposition during the calendar year tion of offender characteristics and patterns of
1980. Data were collected and submitted by court action and case dispOSition. Collected
logical record length data format with SPSS Summary: This study provides data on how
control cards prosecutors and the courts disposed of crimi-
nal cases Involving adults arrested for felony
rectangular file structure crimes in two Individual urban jurisdictions,
642,127 cases Portland, Oregon and Washington, D.C.
60 variables Cases in the data files were Initiated or filGd in
152-unlt-long record 1982. Both the Washington, D.C. file and the
1 record per case Portland file contaln Information on all let any
arrests (which Include arrests declined as
well as those filed), cases filed, and cases in-
dicted. Sentencing information Is provided In
the Portland file but Is not available for Wash-
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Ington D.C. Class IV
U.S. Department of Justice
Universe: All Information stored on aJurisdic-
State and local probation and parole tlon's manageml:lnt system for felony cases
systems, 1976 Initiated in 1982, cases initiated in 1981, and
cases initiated in the two or more years after
(ICPSR 7673) 1982.
This study Is a census of all state and local Note: For reasons of confidentiality, the pollee
probation and parole systems. it was con- department Identification number, the individ-
ducted In late 1976 by the United States Bu- ual's true name, and the circuit attorney's
reau of the Census for the Bureau of Justice manual case file number have been blanked.
Statistics. The data contain Information on This Is part of a larger three-part study.
each agency, Including: jurisdiction, funding
and operation, employment, and client Extent 01 collection: 2 data files
caseload. There are 93 variables for 3,587
agencies. Class II logical record length data format
Part 1
Washington, D.C.
Bureau of JUstice Statistics, rectangular file structure
U.S. Department of Justice 11,185 cases
18 variables
State and local prosecution and civil 1OS-unlt·long record
attorney systems, 1976 1 record per case
(ICPSR 7674) Part 2
Portland
The study is a census of all state and local rectangular file structure
prosecutors and civil attorney systems. The 6,146 cases
data Vlere collected in late 1976 by the U.S. 30 variables
Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Jus- 180-unlt-long record
tice Statistics. The study includes Information 1 record per case
concerning jurisdiction, funding and opera-
tion, employment, compensation, policies, Related Publications:
and number and type of employees. There Brosl, Kathleen
are 43 variables for 9,229 agencies. Class 11 "A cross-city comparison ollelony case
processing." Washington, D.C.: U.S. Gov-
ernment Printing Office, 1979.
Boland, Barbara and Elizabeth Brady
"The prosecution of felony arrests, 1980."
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Print-
Ing Office, 1985.
Boland, Barbara
Baldus, David C., George Woodworth, and
Charles A. Pulaski, Jr. Prosecution of felony arrests, 1986:
Indianapolis, Los Angeles, New
Procedural reform of jury murder Orleans, Portland, 5t. Louis, and
convictions In Georgia, 1970-1978 Washington, DC
(ICPSR 9265) (iCPSR 9094)
Summary: The purpose of this data collection Summary: This data collection represents the
was to assess the Impact of the 1973 reforms sixth In a series of statistical reports spon-
of the death penalty laws on the levels of arbi- sored by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The
trariness and discrimination In capital sentenc- purpose of the series is to provide statistical
Ing In Georgia The data cover two different Information on how prosecutors and the
periods corresponding to the periods before courts dispose of criminal cases involving
and after the reform: 1970-1972 and 1973- adults arrested for falony crimes. The 1986 re-
1978. Numerous measures of defendant port provides data on cases that originated as
blameworthiness were developed as a basis felony arrests and were disposed In 1986 for
for assessing levels of arbitrariness and dis- these six jurisdictions; SI. Louis, MO, Wash-
crimination In Georgia's capital charging and Ington, DC, Portland, OR, Indianapolis, IN,
sentencin{1 system. Specific variables Include Los Angeles, CA, and New Orleans, LA.
race, sex, current offense, prior conviction Class II
and arrests, method of killing, and number of
victims. Class IV Universe: All felony arrests disposed In 1986
in Indianapolis, Los Angeles, New Orleans,
Urjverse: All defendmts convicted of murder at Portland. St. Louis. and Washington. DC.
trial during 1973-1978, and for 1970-1972 all
death cases plus life-sentence cases that re- Ext~nt of collection: 6 data files + machine-
sUted in a murder trial conviction in Georgia readable documentation + SPSS control
cards
Sampling: Nonprobabllity sample for 1970-
1972 and all cases (death and life sentence) Card Image data format
convicted of murder at trial from 197310 1978.
Part 1
Extent of collection: 1 data file Indhmapolis
rectangular file structure
Card image data format with SAS control 3,579 cases
cards 31 variables
80-unlt-long record
rectangular file structure 1 record per case
762 cases
160 variables
80-unlt-long record
31 record per case
Part 7
Prosecutors: Middlesex County
rectangular file structure Clarke, Stevens H.
181 cases
48 variables Alaska plea bargaining study I
SO-unlt-Iong record 1974-1976
6 records per case
(lOPSR 7714)
PartB
Self response: Los Angeles County This study examines the characteristics of
rectangular file structure criminal offenders as they affect the primary
29B cases outcomes of their court cases, particularly
377 variables plea bargaining decisIons. The study was con-
BO-unlt-Iong record ducted In Anchorage, Juneau, and Fairbanks,
10 records per case Alaska. over a two-year period from August
1974 to August 1976. The data were col-
Part 9 lected from poHce booking sheets, public fin-
Self response: Middlesex County gerprint files, and court dockets, The unit of
rectangular file structure observation Is the telony case, I.e., a single
202 cases felony charge against a single defendant.
377 variables Each unIt of data contaIns Information about
BO-unlt-Iong record both the detendant and the charge. There are
10 records per case 3,586 cases. The approxImately 200 vari·
abies include demographic and social charac-
Related Publication: teristics of the offender, criminal history ot the
Chalken, Marcia R. and Jan M. Chalken offender, nature ot the offense, evidence, vic-
"Selecting career criminals for priority tim characteristics, and administrative factors
prosecution." Unpublished final report sub- related to the disposition of the case. Class 11
mitted to the National Institute of Justice,
1987.
Part 19
All jurisdictions
rectangular file structure Cunnnf, Mark A. and The National
14,876 cases Association of Criminal Justice Planners
24 variables A sentencing postscript: Felony
80-unlt-long record
1 record per case probationers under supervision In the
community, 1983
(ICPSR 8647)
Part 12 Part 19
Offense: Bank embezzlement Offense: Income tax
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
561 cases 636 cases
94 variables 93 variables
378-unlt-long record 401-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 13 Part 20
Offense: Bank robbery Offense: Bribery
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
723 cases 602 cases
86 variables '75 variables
409-unlt-long record 326-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 14 Part 21
Offense: Random other Offense: False claims
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
751 cases 573 cases
85 variables 79 variables
494-unit-long record 326-unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 15 Part 22
Offense: Forgery Offense: Homicide
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
751 cases 578 cases
85 variables 115 variables
386-unit·long record 443-unlt-long record
'I record per case 1 record per case
Part 16 Part 23
Offense: Mail theft Offense: Add l'Iarcotics
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
154 cases 737 cases
74 variables 6 variables
376-unit-long record 15-unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 17 Part 24
Offense: Mail fraud AO: Combined
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
480 cases 4,728 cases
72 variables 28 variables
388-unit·long record as-unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 5
Dispute survey open-ended questions
20,402 cases
84-unlt-long record
1 record per case
Summary: The purpose of this study was to Summary: This data collection tabulates the
update the directory listing of felony courts In number of persons convicted of felonies In
this country, and to provide a universe from state courts and describes the sentences
which a sample of courts could be selected these Individuals receiVed. Data were col-
based on felony caseload. The study Includes lected from state courts and state prosecutors
Information on all state felony courts In the In 100 counties of the United States. The col-
United States, Including the number of cases lection contains soclodemographlc Informa-
filed and dispoGed by conviction, acquittal, dis- tion such as age, race, and sex of felon.
missal, or other means. Court administrators Types of offenses committed Include homi-
were asked to Indicate the manner In Which cide, rape, and robbery. Adjudication vari-
cases filed and disposed were counted, such ables referring to the process between arrest
as by defendant, charge, or Indictmentlinfor- and sentencing are also a part of this dataset.
malion. The total number of cases disposed Data can be analyzed on a national level or
during the period was also collected for juve- by the Individual counties. Class II
nile delinquents and fex traffic offenses (mov-
Ing violations,) where applicable. Finally, data Universe: Sentenced felons In the United
were gathered on whether felonies reduced States.
to misdemeanors were Included In the felony
count and whether felonies reduced to misde- Sampling: A two-stage stratified cluster sam-
meanors were Included In the felony count pling design was employed. At the first stage
and whether lower courts In the jurisdiction ac- all counties In the nation were divided Into six
cept guilty pleas to felonies. Class II strata. At the second stage, a systematic sam-
ple of felons sentenced for murder/nonnegll-
Universe: All general Jurisdiction courts In the gent manslaughter, rape, robbery, aggravated
United States. assault, burglary, felony larceny/motor vehicle
theft, drug tralficking, and other offenses was
Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine- selected from each county's official records.
readable documentatIon + SPSS control cards
Extent of collection; 1 data file + machine-
OSIRIS and card image data formats, with readable documentation + SPSS control
SPSS control cards for each cards
rectangular file structure OSIRIS and card image data formats, with
3,590 cases SPSS control cards for each
48 varIables
193-unit-long record rectangular file structure
3 records per case 55,966 cases
66 variables
293-unlt-long record
5 records per case
Courts 91
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Related Publication:
U.S. Department of Justice Langan, Patrick A., and John N. Dawson
"Felony sentences in state courts, 1988."
National Judicial reporting program, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Print-
1988: [United States] ing Office, December 1990.
(ICPSR 9449)
Courts 93
Part 16 Part 1
Offenders who terminated supervision, County data
1984-1986 rectangular file structure
rectangular file structure 491 cases
76,612 cases 46 variables
149 variables 289-unlt-long record
796-unlt-long record 4 records per case
1 record per case
Part 2
Related Publications: Preliminary program data
Bureau of Justice Statistics rectangular file structure
"Federal criminal cases, 1980-87: Federal 750 cases
offenses and offenders." Washington, DC: 180 variables
Bureau of Justice Statistics, July 1989. 461-unlt-long record
Bureau of Justice Statistics 6 records per case
"Pretrial release and detention: The ball re-
form act of 1984." Washington, DC: Bu- Part 3
reau of Justice Statistics, February 1988. Conflict program data
rectangular file structure
148 cases
180 variables
461-unlt-long record
Abt Associates, Inc. 6 records per case
National Indigent criminal defense
survey, 1982: [United States]
(ICPSR 8417) Aikman, Alexander, Mary Bsner Cram,
Summary: This survey was conducted to pro- and Frederick Miller
vide defense practitioners, policy makers, and Use of adjuncts to supplement Judicial
planners in the criminal justice system with
resources In six Jurisdictions,
national-level data on topics such as system
types, funding sources, costs, and caseloads 1983·1986: [United States]
of Indigent defense programs. The goal of the (ICPSR 8979)
survey effort was to obtain data concerning
the nature and scope of Indigent service deliv- ThIs study Vvas sponsored by the United States
ery. Specifically, the three basic objectives Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
were to provide descriptive data, to assess tice. The grant number is 83-IJ-CX-0021.
the level of response to defense service deliv-
ery requirements, and to facilitate further re- Summary: This multi-site data collection
search. Class II evaluates the Impact of Judicial adjunct attor-
neys and referees on the court system at the
Universe: Indigent defense programs In the county and state levels In six Jurisdictions: (1)
United States. Pima County, Arizona, (2) Multnomah County,
Oregon, (3) King County, Washington, (4)
Sampling: Stratified random sample based on Hennepin County, Minnesota, (5) Phoenix,
county population size, as reported In the Arizona, and (6) the state of Connecticut •.
1980 Census of the Population. There are three different units of observation
In this study: (1) civil trial cases, (2) trial
Extent of collection: 3 data files + machine- judges, Including regular Judges and adjunct
readable documentation + SPSS control attorneys, and (3) litigating attorneys. The
cards court case data include information on type of
case, date of trial, type of judge, type of dispo-
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with sition, and date of disposition. For the ques-
SPSS control cards for each tionnaire data obtained on judges, adjuncts,
and litigating attorneys, information Includes
experience with the program, satisfaction,
and Ideas for changes. Class IV
Courts 95
Association of the Bar of the Cny of NGW on at least one felony charge In Manhattan's
York and the Drug Abuse Council, Inc. Criminal Court In 1972 and 1975, were
sampled.
New York drug law evaluation project,
1973 Criminal court study file: The data contain
1,802 records, 901 respondents, 2 records
(ICPSR 7656) per respondent, and approximately 44 vari-
ables. The purpose of this study was to esti-
T1is study was sponsored by the United States mate the number and proportion of felony
Depcrtmsnt of Justice, National Institute of Jus- crimes committed In Manhattan that are attrlb·
tice. The grMt number Is 76-NI-GG-0115. utable to narcotics users. Case records for
male defendants, ages 16 and OVfK, who
Summary: The Association of the Bar of the were arraigned on at least one felony charge
City of New York and the Drug Abuse Council In Manhattan's Criminal Court or Manhattan's
jointly organized a committee and research Supreme Court, were sampled from 1971
project to collect data, In a systematic fash- through 1975. Eighty percent of the sample
Ion, about the 1973 drug law revision and to was drawn from the Criminal Court while the
evaluate the law's effectiveness. The objec- remalnlng 20 percent was taken from the Su-
tives of the project were: 1) to ascertain the re- preme Court.
percussions of the drug law revision; 2) to
analyze, to the degree possible, why the law Prison detox study file: The data contain
was revised; 3) to Identify any general princi- 7,100 records, 3,550 respondents, 2 records
ples or specific lessons that can be derived per respondent, and approximately 67 vari-
from the New York experience and that can ables. The purpose of this study was to esti-
be helpful to other states as they wrestie with mate the number and proportion of felony
the problem of illegal drug use and related crimes attributable to narcotics users In Man·
crime. Class" hattan. Detained malE!ll ages 16 and over In
Manhattan pretrial detention centers who face
Ave files contained within the study are being at least one current felony charge were
released at this time. These files are de- sampled.
scribed as follows:
Courts 97
forfeitures, fines, ti'ansfers, and other traffic Parts 15·28
dlsposi~ons for bench and Jury trials. This file Appellate tormlnatlons flies, 1971·1984
contains 145 variables. rectangular file structure
12,428 to 31,186 cases per part
5. State appellate court caseload inven- 80 variables
tory: These data have variables on the num· 218·unlt·long record
ber of begin· ending, filed, disposed, end· 1 record per case
pending, and ·certiorari granted" cases for
various appeals, original proceedings, reo Parts 29·32
quests to appeal cases, and other appellate· Criminal Terminations, 1984-1987
level case types. Each file of this study has In· rectangular file structure
formation on state population; number of 48,400 to 57,700 cases per part
judges; court's jurisdiction; court's repo~ng 46 variables
year; court's jury and bench trial deflnl~ons; 133· to 134·unlt·long records per part
and court's c/vll and criminal units of court. 1 record per case
The data are for the 50 states, Guam, Puerto
Rico, and the District of Columbia. There are Part 33
15 files each with a logical record length of 80 Criminal pending, 1987
characters. Class II rectangular file structure
37,500 cases
46 variables
134·unlt·long record
1 record per case
Federal Judicial Center
Federal court cases 1970·1989: Parts 34·36
Integrated data base Appellate terminations, 1985·1987
rectangular file structure
(ICPSR 8429) 31 ,388 to 34,444 cases per part
80 variables
Summary: This data collection provides an of· 218·unlt-long record
fiC/al public record of the functioning of the 1 record per case
federal courts. Gathered from 100 court of·
fices throughout the United States, these data Part 37
focus on two points In the life of a case, filing Appel/ate pending, 1987
and termination, and are grouped Into three rectangular file structure
categories: criminal terminations, appellate 26,008 cases
termlna~ons, and appellate pending data. 80 variables
The termination data contain Information on 218·unlt·long record
both filing and termination while the pending 1 record per case
data contain only filing Informa~on. For the ap.
pellate data, the unit of analysis Is a single Parts 38·55
case. The unit of analysis for criminal data Is Civil terminations, 1970·1987
a single defendant. Class II rectangular file structure
80,520 to 238,080 cases per part
Universe: All federal court cases. 42 variables
147·unlt·long record
Exte.,t of collection: 64 data flies + machine· 1 record par case
readable documentation + SPSS control
cards Part 66
Civil pending, 1987
logical record length data format rectangular file structure
243,240 cases
Parts 1·14 42 variables
Criminal terminations files, 1970·1983 147-unit·long record
rectangular file structure 1 record per case
39,400 to 62,500 cases per part
46 variables
133· to 134·unlt·long records per part
1 record per case
Courts 99
occupation and years In residence In Oregon, dataset consists of 82 variables for civil cases
educational background, family Information, Including type of complaint, relationship be·
and past jury and trial Information. The data tween parties, relief sought and relief granted,
Include both Individual-level juror and aggre- size of file, and the historical Interest of the
gate jury case data. The data collection con- case. Fifty-two variables exist for the criminal
talns 199 variables and the data are In card- cases, Including type of crime, pleas, sen·
Image format with a logical record length of tences, appeals, size of file, and the historical
80 characters. The data Include Information Interest of the case. Class IV
on 6,657 jurors and 1,159 trials. There are
48,244 records with 7 records per case. Related Publication:
Class IV Hindus, M.S., T.M. Hammett, and B.M. Hobson
"The files of the Massachusetts Superior
Court, 1859-1959: An analysis and a plan
for action." Report of the Massachusetts
Judlclai Records Committee to the su-
Heinz, John P. and Edward O. Laumann preme Judicial Court, Boston, 1979.
Chicago lawyers survey, 1975
(ICPSR 8218)
Cour/stot
spondents, one record per respondent and United States having jurisdiction over juvenile
approximately 50 variables. Class IV matters.
National Center for Juvenile JUstice Extent of collection: 4 data files + machine-
readable documentation
Juvenile court statistics, 1985:
[United States1 Logical record length data format
National Center for JUVenile Justice National Center for Juvenile JUstice and
and Minnesota State Court Administration Missouri Division of Youth Services
Mlnnesnta Juvenile court records, Missouri juvenile court records,
1984-1987 1984·1987
(ICPSR 9447) (ICPSR 9448)
Summary: This data collection provides Infor- Summary: This data collection provides Infor-
mation on the disposition of juvenile court mation on each juvenile case disposed in the
cases (delinquency, status, and dependency) state of Missouri during calendar years 1984-
in the state of Minnesota. Data are included 1987. The Missouri Division of Youth Services
on all cases petitioned before the juvenile within the Department of Social Services be-
courts and supply Information on sex, race, gan collecting and disseminating juvenile
court data In 1975 as the result of legislation
Courts 103
passed by the state. Despite this legislation, Office of JUVenile Justice and Delinquency
no binding laws required the courts to submit Prevention
data to the Division of Youth Services. In "Updates on statistics." Washington, DC:
1980, such a law was passed, and data were U.S. Government Printing Office, n.d.
first collected In 1982 and 1983. The system
was automated In 1984, and these data are
now aVailable for public use. The data files
provide Information on Juveniles' progress National Center for Juvenile Justice
through the Juvenile Justice system from the
time of referral to Juvenile court to final dispo- and Nebraska Commission on Law
sition. Variables include sex, race, and birth Enforcement and Criminal Justice
date of the Juveniles, court referral date, ma-
jor allegation, number of law violations, num-
Nebraska Juvenile court records,
ber of prior referrals, detention status, jail 1975·1987
status, court orders, placement status, and fi- (ICPSR 8915)
nal court action. Class IV
Summary: Data In this collection provide infor-
Universe: Records from the state of Mis- mation on the disposition of JUVenile court
souri's courts with Juvenile Jurisdiction. cases In the state of Nebraska. The data files
contain Individual records on each delin-
Extent of collection: 4 data files + machine- quency, status offense, neglect, and depend-
readable documentation ency case disposed. Cases processed for-
mally (with a petition) and those handled
logical record length data format Informally (without a petition) are Included for
most courts. Records contain a county code,
Part 1 the youth's data of birth, age at referral, sex,
Missouri juvenile court data, 1984
date of referral, source of referral, number of
rectangular file structure prior referrals, care pending disposition, rea-
48,418 cases son for referral, manner of handling, date of
49 variables disposition, and case disposition. A case may
10S-unit-long record have Included more than one offense, but
1 record per case only the "most serious· offense (In the opinion
of court personnel) Is recorded. The majority
Part 2 of records also Include Information on diag-
Missouri juvenile court data, 1985 nostic services needed, educational attain-
rectangular file structure ment employment and school status, length
53,054 cases of re;ldence of child in county, child's living ar-
49 variables rangements at referral, marital status of natu-
1OS-unit-Iong record ral parents, combined family annual Income,
1 record per case
whether or not the youth was represented by
counsel, and the occupation of the primary
Part 3 parent or guardian. Class IV
Missouri juvenile court data, 1986
rectangular tile structure Universe: Records from the state of Ne-
56,847 cases braska's courts with juvenile jurisdiction.
49 variables
1OS-unit-long record Extent of collection: 13 data files + machine-
1 record per case readable documentation
Part 4 logical record length data format
Missouri juvenile court data, 1987
rectangular file structure Parts 1-13
57,963 cases Nebraska Juvenile court data, 1975-1985
49 variables rectangular file structure
1OS-unit-Iong record 4,454 to 6,856 cases per part
1 record per case 40 variables
80-unit-long record
Related Publications: 1 record per case
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention
"Juvenile court statistics." Washington,
DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, n.d.
Courts 105
ture of the decision, whether a monetary Spaeth, Harold J.
award was granted and, If so, the amount In-
volved. Information also Is Included on United States supreme court JudiCial
whether a government litigant was Involved, If database, 1953·1988 tenns
a Jury trial was requested and by whom, type
of attorney for plaintiff and defendant, tvpe (ICPSR 9422)
and number of motions filed (and by whom),
and outcome of appeal, If applicable. Summary: This data collection encompasses
CLASS IV all aspects of United States Supreme Court
decision-making from the beginning of the
Universe: Civil federal district court cases Warren Court In 1953 to the completion of the
filed and terminated In Houston, Detroit, and most recent term of the Rehnqulst Court. Vari-
Kansas City, between 1981 and 1987. ables in this database concern six distinct as-
pects of the Court's decisions. (1) Identifica-
Extent of collection: 1 data file tion variables Include case citation, docket
number, unit of analysis, and number of re-
logical record length data format cords per unit of analysis. (2) Background
variables offer Information on origin of case,
rectangular file structure source of case, reason for granting cert, par-
7,995 cases ties to the case, direction of the lower court's
37 variables decision, and manner in which the Court
60-unlt-long record takes jurisdiction. (3) Chronological variables
1 record per case cover date of oral argument, reargument
~ate, decision date, term of Court, chief jus-
tice, and natural court. (4) Substantive vari-
ables Include multiple legal prOVisions, author-
ity for decision, Issue, issue areas, and
Silverstein, Lee and Stuart S. Nagel direction of decision. (5) Outcome variables
supply information on form of decision. dispo-
American bar foundation: State sition of case, winning party, declaration of un-
criminal court cases, 1962 constitutionality, and multiple memorandum
(ICPSR 7272) decisions. (6) Voting and opinion variables
pertain to the vote in the case and the direc-
During the years 1963-1964 data were col- tion of the Individual Justices' votes. Class IV
lected on the 1962 criminal court cases for
the 50 states and the District of Columbia. A Note: This data collection contains both nu-
sample of cases from 194 counties was se- meric and alphanumeric fields.
lected and weighted to yield a national cross-
section of cases. The data Include demo- Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
graphic information on the defendant, state readable documentation
and county of trial, offense charged, sen-
tence, type of counsel, amount of bail, length Logical record length data format and SPSS
of time in jail ant,' other variables relating to export file
disposition of the case. Thore Is one card of
data for each of the 11,257 cases. Class IV Part 1
Court raw dala file
Related Publications: rectangular file structure
Nagel, Stuart S. 9,976 cases
"Disparities In criminal procedure." UCLA 188 variables
Law RevIew 14 (1967), 1272. 555-unit-long record
Nagel, Stuart S. 1 record per case
"The tipped scales of American justice."
Transaction: Social Science and Modern Part 2
Society 1966, 3. SPSS export file
Nagel, Stuart S. 80-unlt-long record
"Effects of alternative types of counsel on
criminal procedure." Indiana Law Journal Part 3
48 (1973), 404. Codebook
80-unit-long record
Related Publication:
United States Sentencing Commission
Untted States Sentencing Commission Annual report, 1988.
Monitoring of federal criminal
sentences, 1987·1989
(lCPSR 9317) Untted States Sentencing Commission
Summary: Two databases of federal criminal Organizations convicted In federal
cases sentenced under the Sentencing criminal courts, 1998: [United States]
Guidelines and Policy Statements of the Sen-
tencing Reform Act of 1984 comprise this (ICPSR 9513)
data collection. The first database Includes all
cases received by the United States Sentenc- Summary: The data describe offense and
Ing Commission that had sentencing dates sentencing characteristics for organizations
between November 1, 1987 and December sentenced in federal district courts in 1988.
31, 1988 and were assessed as constitu- The purpose of the collection was to shape
tional. Constitutionality compares each case's the guidelines development process of the
sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to United States Sentencing Commission. The
provide uniformity in reporting the cases. The Commission's primary function is to Inform
cases are categorized as New Law, with all of- federal courts of sentencing policies and prac-
fenses occurring after the November 1, 1987 tices that include guidelines prescribing the
Guidelines, or as Mixed Law, with at least one appropriate form and severity of punishment
count occurring after the Guideline effective- for offenders convicted of federal r.rimes.
ness date and other counts prior to the Guide- Court-related variables include primary of-
lines. This database contains 6,129 New Law fense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain,
caseH and 94 Mixed Law cases. The second dates of disposition and sentencing, method
database Includes all cases received as of of determination of gUilt, number of counts
Novamber 8, 1989 that were sentenced be- pled and charged, and dates and types of
t1'leen January 1, 1989 and June 30, 19B9. It sentencing and restitution. Defendant organi·
contains 9,233 New Law and 127 Mixed Law zation variables Include ownership structure,
cases. Class IV number of owners and employees, highest
level of corporate knowledge of the criminal
Universe: All federal criminal court cases en- offense, highest level of corporate Indictment
tering the court system between 1987 and and conviction for participation in the criminal
1989. offense, annual revenue, equity and financial
status of the defendant organization, whether
Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine- it was a criminal organization, duration of
readable documentation criminal activity, and risk to national security.
Class IV
logical record length data format
Universe: An organizational defendants sen-
Part 1 tenced In federal district courts during 1988.
1987·1988 data
rectangular file structure Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
6,223 cases readable documentaticn
90 variables
236-unit-long record Logical record length data format
1 record per case
rectangUlar file structure
328 cases
80 variables
999-unit-long record
1 record per case
Courts 107
Vera Inst~ute of Justice, New Yorl< C~y nal Justice Agency, and CEP were used to ob-
tain Information on the prior and subsequent
New York City court employment arrests of the participants. Variables include
project evaluation study, 1976·1979 the age, sex, race and charges aga/nst the
defendant, previous training and work experi-
(ICPSR 7832) ence, satisfaction with CEP services, atten-
dance at counselling sessions, type of
The New York City Court Employment Project employment found, job attendance, and sub-
(CEP) Is an Independent corporation under sequent arrests and convictions. The collec-
contract to New York City's Human Re- tion contains 29,422 card Images with up to
sources Administration. CEP Was designed to 61 records for each of the 666 cases. Class IV
divert accused offenders from routine court
procedures of criminal prosecution, sentenc-
Ing and possible Incarceration, and to place
the~ Into jobs, training, or vocationally ori-
ented counseling services. Established In Yankelovich, Skelly, and Whtte, Inc.
1968, making it one of the oldest pretrial Inter- Survey of Judges on the role of courts
vention programs In the U.S., the ultimate aim
of CEP Is to change the incomegenerating ba- In American society, 1979
havior of its participants to reduce their sub- (ICPSR 7824)
sequent criminal activity. Eligible defendants
must agree to attend mandatory counselling The U.S. Department of Justice's Office for
sessions, devise and execute an Individual Improvements In the Administration of Justice
plan for securing training and employment, authorized this survey of judges on the role of
and avoid arrest and conviction during their courts In American society. The role of courts,
participation. Charges are dismissed by the rather than encompassing issues of policy-
court if, at the end of the six-month period, making, Is more narrowly focused on Issues
CEP counselors determine that the defendant of caseload management. Federal and state
has participated successfully. The Vera Insti- judges In five districts (Milwaukee/Eastern
tute of Justice, a nonprofit New York City pol- Wisconsin, South Carolina, Philadelphia!
icy research agency which originally organ- Eastern Pennsylvania, Albuquerque/New
Ized CEP, conducted its evaluation of CEP Mexico, and Los Angeles/Central California)
With funding from the National Institute of Law were questioned about the amount of time
Enforcement and Criminal Justice. The study they spent on routine judicial activities, the
compares a control group of non-CEP offend- time spent on certain types of cases, their
ers With an experimental group of CEP partici- techniques for reducing or more expeditiously
pants to assess the program's effectiveness handling heavy caseloads, and their sugges-
In helping offenders find and maintain employ- tions for extra-jUdicial dispute settlement proc-
ment or training and avoid criminal activity. esses that could serve as alternatives to
Data were collected on 666 SUbjects With 410 courts. Variables include judges' legal edu~a
in the experimental group and 256 in the con- tion and experience, types of cases heard In
trol group. Three interviews were conducted the previous year, percent of time spent on
at six-month intervals with each subject, in- particular types of cases, characteristics of
itially to record self-reports about criminal ac- cases requiring excessive time, and tech-
tivity work experience, social service and niques for caseload management. The collec-
training needs, and then to maintain current tion contains approximately 250 variables for
information about their school, employment, each of the 104 respondents and has a logi-
Income arid court processing status. Files cal record length of 720. Class IV
from th~ NYC Police Department, the Crimi-
The data were collected by the UnIted States These dala are taken from a specIal compila-
Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Jus- tion of dala and sources aVallable from the
tice Statistics. There is a separate dataset for Census Bureau's 1982 Census of Govern.
each fiscal year beginning In 1970-1971. ments. The census on governmental and pub-
Data were collected for all state and county lic employment provides data on expenditure
governments, all municipal governments with and employment, by function, of federal,
a population over 10,000, and a sample of state, and local governments (counties, cities,
municipal governments with a popUlation un- townships, school districts, and other special
der 10,000. The survey was accomplished us- districts). Information Is Included on total em-
Ing both field compilation and mail canvass. ployment, total police protection, police pro-
The variables include Identincation of each tection with arrest powers, other police protec-
government, number of full and part-time em· tion, Judlcial.legal employment, corrections
ployees, level of full- and part-time payroll, employment, total expenditures, police protec-
current expenditure, capital outlay, and Inter- tion expenditures, judicial-legal expenditures,
governmental expenditures for six sectors: po- and corrections expenditures. The data are
lice protection, Judicial, legal servicas and contalned in one file which has a logical re-
prosecution, public defense, corrections and cord length of 803 characters. There are 80
other. There are approximately 8,000 records variables and 321 cases. Class If
In each file. Data and documentation for fiscal
years 1971-1975 were prepared by the Cen-
ter for Advanced Computation, University of il-
linois, Urbana. Class 11 Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Related Publication: U.S. Department of justice
U.S. Department of Commerce. U.S. Bureau Expenditure and employment dats for
of the Census
"Expenditure and employment data for the the criminal Justice system [United
criminal Justice system." Washington. States]: Extract file, 1983
D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. (ICPSR 8455)
One publication for each ye:at.
Summary: These data were compiled from
the United States Census Bureau's 1983 sur-
veys of governmental finances and employ-
ment, which provide information on expendi-
ture and employment, by function, of the
federal, state, and local governments. Fed·
eral government financial data for this collec-
tion were obtained from those data contalnaci
in the Budget of the United States for the Rs·
cal Year 1985. State and large county and
city finance statistics were compiled by Cen-
sus Bureau representatives from official re-
Expenditure and employment data for Summary: This file provides data on federal,
the criminal Justice system [United state, and local governmental expenditures
states]: Extract file, 1986 and employment for criminal justice activities
in the United States. Information is supplied
(ICPSR 9160) on police protection, judicial and 1El9a1 servo
ices, and correctional institutions and agen·
Summary: These data collections prElsent cies. Variables describing each of these crimi·
public expenditure and employment data per· naI Justice functions include number of and
taining to criminal justice activities in the payroll for full·time, part·time, and full·time
United States. Information on employment, equivalent employees, current total and gen·
payroll, and expenditures Is provided for po. eral expenditures, capital outlay, and intergov·
lice, courts, prosecutors' offices, and correc· ernmental expenditures. Class 1/
tions agencies. Specific variables include
Identification of each government, number of Universe: Local governments identified in the
full· and part·time employees, level of full· 1982 Census of Governments, modified by
Summary: This dataset presents public ex- Project STAR was designed to collect Infor-
penditure and employment data on criminal mation about the various roles of operational
justice activities In the United States. Informa- criminal justice personnel In order to anslst In
tion on employment, payroll, and expendi- the design of educational and training pro-
tures Is provided for police, courts, prosecu- grams for these personnel. Data were col-
tors' offices, and corrections agencies. lected from a two-part questionnaire adminis-
Specific variables are Identification of each tered to criminal justice personnel In four
government, number of full- and part-time em- state~: California, Michigan, New ,Jersey and
ployees, level of full- and part-time payroll, Texas. The first part of the questionnaire con-
current expenditures, capital outlay, and Inter- tains general Information Including personal,
governmental expenditures. Class II attitUdinal, and opinion Items as well as ques-
tions concerning the goals of the criminal jus-
Universe: All state, county, municipality, and tice system. The second part consists of 97
township governments and university campus situations which the respondent was asked to
police departments In the United States. rank using a five-part scale. The situations
deal with the roles of police officers, prosecut-
Sampling: Probability sampling In which the Ing attorneys, defense attorneys, Judges, pro-
relative size of a government's criminal justice bation officers, correctional officers and pa-
expenditure as reported in the 1982 Census role officers. The data are organized In four
of Governments determines Its probability of flies by state. The logical record length Is
selection. Each sample case was assigned a 3,912 characters for aU cases. Class IV
weight based on its probability of selection. In-
cluded were 173 state, county, municipality,
and township governments serving popula-
tions of 10,000 or more, 8,100 general pur-
pose state and local governments with popu- Bureau of Social Science Research, Inc.
lations under 10,000, and 1,000 special National manpower survey, 1973·1976
campus police departments from universities
and colleges. (ICPSR 7675)
Extent of collection: 2 data tiles + machine- The National Manpower Sur.vey was under-
readable documentation + SPSS control taken in 1974 to assess the adequacy of exist-
cards Ing fedeial, state and local training and educa-
tion (T and E) programs to meet both current
OSIRIS and card Irnage data formats, with personnel needs In various law
SPSS control cards for each enforcement and criminal justice functions
and operations. In order to assess the future
Part 1 adequacy of T and E resources, the study In-
Full tended to project futlJre personnel and train-
rectangular tile structure Ing needs by occupation, In relation to antici-
7,276 cases pated availability of qualified personnel. It
166 variables also sought to establish "needs priorities· as a
1, 153-unit-long record basis for future training and ClCadamlc assis-
19 records per case tance programs to be funded by the Bureau
of Justice Statistics (BJS). The study design
Part 2 systematically covers the personnel needs In
Estimate all state and local government agencies
rectangular file structure which are part of the law enforcement and
366 cases criminal justice system. Sectors within the sys-
143 variables tem Include: 1) law enforcement sector, con-
691-unit-long record sisting of police departments and sheriffs
11 records per case agencies ranging In size from one person con-
stabularies to largo city departments employ-
Delinquency 121
Monitoring the future: A continuing Johnston, L.D., J.G. Bachman, and P.M.
study of the lifestyles and values of O'Malley
youth,1980 "Student drug use, attitudes, and beliefs:
National trends, 1975-1981." DHHS Publi-
(ICPSR 7900) cation No. ADM 83-1260, 1982.
In the 1980 wave, 16,524 students were Monitoring the future: A continuing
questioned. study of the lifestyles and values of
youth,1985
Monitoring the future: A continuing
study of the lifestyles and values of (ICPSR 8546)
youth,1981
Summary: The eleventh annual survey In the
(ICPSR 9013) Monitoring the Future series continues that
series' exploration of changes in many Impor-
This is the seventh In the continuing series of tant values, behaviors, and lifestyle orienta-
annual surveys of high school seniors In the tions of contemporary American youth. A na-
U.S. The 1981 nationally representative sam- tionally representative sample of high school
ple of public and private high school students seniors was asked to respond to a set of drug
includes a total of 18,267 respondents. use and demographic questions. In addition
to these "core" questions, which were In-
Monitoring the future: A continuing cluded In all five questionnaire forms, each of
study of the lifestyles and values of the forms sought student response to ques-
tions on certain other subjects. These in-
youth,1982 cluded attitudes toward government, social In-
(ICPSR 9045) stitutions, race relations, changing roles for
women, educational aspirations, occupational
The eighth survey questioned 18,348 public alms, and family plans. Class II
and private high school students from a na-
tionally representative sample. Universe: High school seniors in the contigu-
ous United States.
Monitoring the future: A continuing
study of the lifestyles and values of Sampling: National multistage sample.
youth,1983 Extent of collection: 6 data files + machlne-
(ICPSR 8387) readable documentation + SPSS control
cards
Th.e 1983 sample of public and private high
school students include 16,947 respondents. OSIRIS and card image data formats, with
SPSS control cards for each
Monitoring the future: A continuing
Part 1
study of the lifestyles and values of Form 1 questionnaire
youth,1984 rectangular file structure
(ICPSR 8388) 3,312 cases
650 variables
The 1984 sample of public and private high 663-unit-long record
school students Include 16,499 respondents. 10 records per case
Related Publications:
Part 2
Bachman, J.G. and LD. Johnston Form 2 questionnaire
rectangular file structure
"The monitoring the future project: Design 3,329 cases
and procedures." Ann Arbor, MI: Institute 354 variables
for Social Research, 1978.
O·Malley,P.M., J.G. Bachman, and L.D. 367-unit-long record
6 records per case
Johnston
"Period, age, and cohort effects on sub-
stance use among American youth: 1976-
1982." Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social
Research, 1983.
Part 4 Part 3
Form 4 questionnaire Form 3 questionnaire
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
3,278 cases 3,148 cases
323 variables 369 variables
337-unit-long record 382-unlt-long record
5 records per case 6 records per case
PartS Part 4
Form 5 questionnaire Form 4 questionnaire
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
. 3,284 cases 3.120 cases
392 variables 325 variables
405-unlt-long record 339-unlt-long record
6 records per case 5 records per case
Part 6 Part 5
Core variables Form 5 questionnaire
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
16,502 cases 3,083 cases
117 variables 395 variables
130-unlt-long record 408-unlt-long record
2 records per case 6 records per case
Sampling: National multistage sample. Summary: This Is the thirteenth annual sur-
vey in this series that examines values, life-
Extent of collection: 6 data files + machine- styles, and behaviors among American youth.
readable documentation + SPSS control Class II
cards
Universe: High school seniors in the contigu-
OSIRIS and card image data formats, with ous United States.
SPSS control cards for each
Sampling: National multistage sample.
Part 1
Form 1 questionnaire Extent of collection: 6 data files + machine-
rectangular file structure readable documentation + SPSS control
3,188 cases cards
661 variables
676-unit-long record OSIRiS and card image data formats, with
10 records per case SPSS control cards for each
Delinquency 123
Part 1 and rate of change occurring over time. The
Form 1 questionnaire second obJective, more analytic than descrip-
rectangular file structure tive, Involves the explanation of the relation-
3,375 cases ships and trends observed. Several questions
673 variables relate to respondents' use of drugs-for ex-
689-unlt-long record ample, use of cigarettes, alcoholic beverages,
9 records per case mariJuana, hashish, psychedelic drugs, am-
phetamines, barbiturates, tranquilizers, co-
Part 2 caine, crack, heroin, and other narcotics. Also
Form 2 questionnaire Included are questions on parents' marital
rectangular file structure status and education, as weil as respondents'
3,368 cases religious preferences, school activities, politi-
377 variables cal beliefs and preferences, educational aspi-
390-unlt-long record rations, occupational alms, and mental and
5 records per case family plans. Additional questions probe for re-
spondents' attitudes toward government, so-
Part 3 clallnstltutlons, race relations, and changing
Form 3 questionnaire roles for women. Demographic Information on
rectangular file structure respondents such as race, sex, education,
3,358 cases and marital status are supplied. Class II
369 variables
382-unlt-long record Universe: High school seniors In the contigu-
5 records per case ous United States.
Delinquency 125
Part 5 Note: The data are organized hlerarhlcally In
Form 4 questionnaire two levels: (1) a person record, and (2) one or
rectangular file structure more arrest records. Number of records per
2,854 cases case varies In Elach of the two data files. The
341 variables number of records Is dependent on the num·
355·unlt·long record ber of arrests an offender had. There are 14
5 records per case variables and 129,010 cases at the person
level, and 16 variables and 12,555 cases at
Part 6 the arrest level.
Form 5 questionnaire
rectangular file structure Extent of Collection: 2 data flies
2,852 cases
395 variables logical Record Length data format
408·unlt·long record
6 records per case Part 1
Arrests for serious crimes
Part 7 hierarchical file structure
Form 6 questionnaire
rectangular file structure Part 2
2,851 cases Arrests for larceny or auto theft
387 variables hierarchical file structure
4oo·unlt·long record
6 records per case
TIls study was sponsored by the United States rectangular file structure
Depmment of Justice, Natlon~ Inst"ute of Jus- 987 cases
tice. The grEM'lt number Is 8O-NI-AX-003. 200 variables
360-unlt-long record
Summary: This Is an Investigation of crimino- 1 record per case
logical and sociological factors within the
black community, and focuses on the alleged Related Publication:
high incidence of violent crime committed by Denno, Deborah W.
blacks. Four communities within Atlanta, 'Soclologlcal and human development ex-
Georgia and four within Washington, DC planations of crime: Conflict or consen-
were selected for this study: two communities sus?" CrImInology 23 (1985),711-741.
In each area were designated high crime ar-
eas whUe the other two were low crime areas.
Included among the variables are: the rela-
tionship of race and socioeconomic class to EHlott, Delbert
crime, faar of crime and experiences, con-
tacts and attitudes toward the police, gender, National youth survey [United States]:
and religion. There are 621 cases tn this da- Wave I, 1976
taset, which has a logical record length of 84
characters. Class IV (ICPSR 8375)
Delinquency 127
Elliott, Delbert OSIRIS and card Image data formats
National youth survey [United States]: rectangular file structure
Wave II, 1977 1,725 cases
900 variables
(ICPSR 8424) 1,368-unit-long record
21 records per case
Parent and youth data for the second wave of
the National Youth Survey are contalned In
this data collection. The first wave was con-
ducted in 1976 (iCPSR 8375). Youths and
their par6f1ts or legal guardians were inter- Elliott, Delbert
viewed In early 1978 about events and behav- National youth survey [United States]:
Ior which had occurred In 1977. The second
wave of the study was funded Jointly by the Wave IV, 19'/9
National InstiMe of Mental Health and the Bu- (lCPSR 8917)
reau of Justice Statistics (formerly the Law
Enforcement Assistance Administration). Be- Summary: Parent and youth data for the
cause of the funding arrangement, the inter- fourth wave of the National Youth Survey are
view schedules used In Wave I and Wave II contained In this dala collection. The first
are slightly different; e.g" there are differ- wave of this survey was conducted In 1976
ences In the "drug use" section. Data were (ICPSR 8375), the second wave In 1977
collected on demographic and socioeconomic (ICPSR 8424), and the third wave in 1978
status of respondents, disruptive events in (ICPSR 8506). Data are aVailable on demo-
the home, neighborhood problems, parental graphic and socioeconomic status of respon-
aspirations for youth, labeling, integration of dents, disruptive events In the home, neigh-
family and peer contexts, attitudes toward de- borhood prcblems, parenla.1 aspirations for
viance In adults and Juveniles, parental disci- youth, labeling, integration of family and peer
pline, and community Involvement. The data contexts, attitudes toward deviance In adults
are contained In one file which has a logical and juveniles, parental discipline, and commu-
record length of 80 characters. There are 963 nity Involvement. Class IV
variables. Class III
Universe: High school aged youth In the
United States.
Delinquency 129
member such as sex, race, date of birth, Part 3
church membership, age, and socioeconomic Adult offense data
status. In addition, two files supply offense rectangular file structure
data, one pertaining to offenses committed 9,057 cases
while a juvenile and the other detailing oi- 109 variables
fenses as an adult. Variables Include most se- 252-unlt-long record
rious offense, police disposition, location of 1 record per case
crime, reason for police response, complain-
ant's sex, age, and race, type of Victimization, Part 4
date of offense, number of victims, average Survey of young adults: 1958 Philadelphia
age of victims, number of victims killed or hos- Birth Cohort Follow-up
pitalized, property loss, weapon Involvement, rectangular file structure
and final court disposition. Class IV 782 cases
Approx. 900 variables
Universe: All children born In Philadelphia dur- SO-unlt-Iong record
Ing 1958. 50 records per case
Delinquency 131
---------,
Sampling: The sample consisted of 250 stu- scores, aga at first theft, and drug and alcohol
dents in three offerings of an undergraduate use. Class IV
criminology class.
Universe: Males In the fourth, seventh, and
Note: This dataset Is a machlne-readabl e text tenth grades from 21 elementary and high
file. For reasons of confidentiality names schools In Orogon.
have been blanked from the data and re-
placed with spaces. Profanity has also been Sampling: Subjects were selected from a
blanked and replaced with spaces. The num- sample of 300 families who volunteered to
ber of records per case In this file varies from participate in all phases of the study.
nine to ten depending on the length of state-
ment given by each respondent. Extent of collection: 2 data files
Part 1
Raw data
rectangular ffie structure Pennell, Susan, Christine Curtis, and Jeff
13,815 cases Tayman
184 variables
351·unit·long record Illegal ImmIgration and crIme In san
1 record per case Diego and EI Paso counties, 1985·1986
Part 2 (ICPSR 9330)
SPSSX export file
rectangular file structure ThIs study was sponsored by the United St<:l.tes
13,815 cases Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus·
184 variables tice. The grant number Is 86·IJ·CX·0038.
80·unlt·long record
Summary: This study was conducted to ex·
amine whether a rising crime rate in EI Paso,
Texas and San Diego, California in 1986
could be attributed to, among other factors,
the Influx of undocumented aliens. Data were
collected 1n the two cities with a focus on serio
O(.IS felony offenses. Variables include level of
involvement of undocumented aliens In serio
ous felony arrests in San Diego and EI Paso
Delinquency 133
Counties, the outcome of serious felony ar- Related PUblications:
rest cases Involving undocumented persons Pennell, S., and J. Tayman
compared to others arrested for similar of- "The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the
fenses, the Impact of arrests of undocu- criminal justice system.· San Diego, CA:
mented aliens on the criminal justice system San Diego Association of Governments,
In terms of workload and cost, the extent that 1989.
criminal justice agencies coordinate their ef- Pennell, S., C. Curtis, and J. Tayman
forts to apprehend and process undocu- "Data resources program award no. CX-
mented a1lem~ who have committed serious 0038: Case tracking study documentation:
crimes In San Diego and EI Paso counties, Illegal immigration and crime in San Diego
and how differences In agency objectives Im- and EI Paso counties, FY 1985-56." San
pede or enhance coordination. Data are also Diego, CA: San Diego Association of Gov-
provided on how many undocumented per- ernments Criminal Justice Research Unit,
sons were arrested/convicted for repeat of- and Los Aitos, CA: Data Resources Pro-
fenses In these counties and which type of gram of the National Institute of Justice,
policies or procedures could be Implemented Soclometrics Corporation, 1989.
In criminal Justice agencies to address the Is-
sue of crimes committed by undocumented
aliens. The collection Includes soclodemo-
graphic characteristics, citizenship status, cur-
rent arrest, case disposition, and prior crimi- Polk, Kenneth
nal history with additional data from San Marlon County [Oregon] youth study,
Diego to compute the costs Involving undocu- 1964·1979
mented aliens. Class IV
(ICPSR 8334)
Universe: Serious felony offense arrests in EI
Paso County, Texas and San Diego County, This Is an investigation of the young men In
California Marion County, Oregon between the years of
1964 and 1979. The subjects were Inter-
Sampling: In EI Paso all arrests for selected viewed In a twelve-wave panel study begin-
offenses were Included. In San Diego all ning In their sophomore year of high school
homicide and rape arrests were Included. A and continUing to age 30. The original base
stratified random sample with equal prob- population was determined through a large
abilities used to select 40 percent of the ar- scale survey of the county's youth, the male
rests was chosen within each of the other of- portion consisting of 1,227 Individuals. The
fense categories, which included robbery, first wave, conducted in the high schools In
aggravated assault, burglary, grand theft and 1964, consisted of a 200- item questionnaire.
motor vehicle theft, receiving stolen property, The second wave, the first In the longitudinal
and felony narcotics offenses. design, Involved face-to-face Interviews with
a 225-item instrument. The ten subsequent
Extent of collection: 2 data files waves of the study were conducted by mail,
at nearly year intervals. The Interview sched-
Card image data format ules are concerned with the issues of coming
of age such as family relations, school per-
Part 1 formance, educational plans, dating, drinking,
San Diego county dala drug use, military service, delinquency, of-
rectangular file structure fenses and dispositions (civilian and military),
4,431 cases and Vietnam experiences. The collection con-
128 variables sists of a data file that has been organized so
80-unit-long record that each of the 1,227 respondents Is repre-
5 records per case sented by 36 separate records. This results In
a total of 44,172 records, each with a logical
Part 2 record length of 162. The first 22 records con-
B Paso county dala tain data on 800 distinct variables gathered in
rectangular file structure the 12 waves of interviews. Records 26-28
2,268 cases are for the 17 variablc,s associated with the ju-
128 variables venile and adult offense data. There are 15
80-unit-long record socioeconomic variables, gathered for the
5 records per case "random sample group· only, which are found
in record 29. The last seven records contain
400 variables which concern Careers and Vi-
etnam Experiences. Class IV
Tt'is study was sponsored by the United States ThIs study VIa'" sponsored by the United States
Depeftment of Justice, National Institute of Jus- Department of Justice, Natiooal Institute of Jus-
tice. The grmt number is 84-IJ·CX-0013. tice. The grant number Is 84-IJ-CX-0013.
These data are intended to be used in con- Summary: This data collection contains data
junction with the Juvenile delinquency and on Juvenile delinquency and adult crime for
adult crime, 1948·1977 [Racine, Wiscon- three birth cohorts in Racine, Wisconsin. The
sin): Three birth cohorts (ICPSR 8163). three birth cohorts are 1942, 1949, and 1955.
These data are organized into 2 different The 1942 cohort consists of 1,352 persons,
types, Biock data and Home data The Block the 1949 cohort of 2,099 persons, and the
Dataset contains the characteristics of each 1955 cohort of 2,676, a total of 6,127 per-
block in Racine for the years 1950, 1960, and sons. These data are organized into 3 basic
1970 as selected from the U.S. Census of types of datasets: 1) Individual-level "Police
Housing for each at these years. The data contact" data for all 3 cohorts, 2} Indlvidual-
are presented for whole blocks for each year level Interview and contact data for the 1942
and for blocks agglomerated into equal and 1949 cohorts, and 3} Individual-level con-
spaces so that comparison may be made be- tact data classified by age for all three co-
tween the 1960, 1960 and 1970 data. In addi- horts, "Age-by-Age" data There are 8 data
tion, land use and target density (gas sta- files in all, The individual-level contact data
tions, grocery and liquor stores, restaurants, sets, referred to as the "police contact data, "
and taverns) measures are included. The contaln equivalent data for all three cohorts.
data were obtalned from land use maps and The data consist of tha type and frequency of
city directories. These block data have been police contacts by individuals as well as the
aggregated into census tracts, police grid ar- date, location, and number of the first contact.
eas, natural areas, and neighborhoods tor the Individual cohort members are the units of
purpose of describing the spatial units of each analysis. The interview datasets contain data
in comparable fashion for 1950, 1960, and on police contacts as well as a number of vari-
1970. The Information contalned within the ables measured during personal interviews
Block data file is intended to be used to with a sample of the 1942 and 1949 cohorts.
merge ecological data onto any of the files de- The interview variables include retrospective
scribed in the Juvenile delinquency adult measures of the respondent's perception of
crimo, 1948-1977 [Racine, Wisconsin}: his or her past police contacts, attitudes to-
Throe birth cohorts codebook. The Home ward the police, and a variety of other vari-
datasets contain selected variables from the ables such as socioeconomic status and age
block data files merged with the cohort police at marriage. The "age-by-age" dataset con-
contact data or the cohort interview data The tains juvenile court and police contact data
Home datasets represent the merged files classified by age. The data are organized into
used by the Principal Investigator for his three equivalent datasets, one for each co-
analysis and are included here only as exam- hort, and the Individual cohort member Is the
ples of how the files from the cohort data may unit of analysis. In contrast to the cohort data,
be merged with the block data. Class IV howeva-, the police contact data are organ-
ized according to the age of the cohort mem-
ber at the time of the contact(s). Thus vari-
ables have been constructed which measure
and summarize the number, type(s}, and seri-
ousness of contacts at a given age. These da·
tasets also contaln detalled data on the
type(s} of dispositlon(s) received by cohort
members at various ages. Class II
Delinquency 135
Singer, Simon I. Related Publication:
Singer, S.I., and D. McDowall
Deterrent effects of the New York ·Crlmlnallzing delinquency: The deterrent
Juvenile offender law, 1974-1984 effects of the New York Juvenile of~ender
iaN." Law and Soc{ety Review 22 (1988),
(ICPSR 9324) 521-535.
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number Is 85-IJ-CX-0026.
Swicord, Donald
Summary: This data collection was designed
Survey of facilities for runaway and
to assess the effects of the New York Juve-
nile Offender law on the rate of violent crime homeless youth, 1983·1988
committed by juveniles. The data were col- (ICPSR 9129)
lected to estimate the deterrent effects of the
law and to permit the use of an interrupted Summary: This data collection Is a compila-
tiffle-S9ries model to gauge the effects of the tion of demographic and service Information
interventi()fl. The deterrent effects of the law collected on youth In resldentlal and non-resi-
are assessed en five types of violent offenses dential shelters for runaways and homeless
over a post-intervention period of 75 months youth. The data provide descriptions of the
using two comparison fAme series to control youths using the shelters Including age, sex,
for temporal and geofjraphical characteristics. race, education, family setting, shelter serv-
One time series pertr.:llns to the monthiy Juve- Ices provided, and aftercare services re-
nile arrests of 16- to 19-year-olds in New York ceiVed. Class IV
City, and the other to monthly arrests of Juve-
niles aged 13 to 15 years in Philadelphia,. the Universe: Runaway and homeless youths In
control jurisdiction. Included in the collection 270 shelters in the United States, the District
are variables concerning the monthly rates of of Columbia, and the Trusts Territories.
violent Juvenile arrests for homicide, rape, as-
sault, arson, and robbery for the two Juvenile Extent of collection: 2 data tiles
cohorts. These time series data were col-
lected by Individual police Jurisdictions that re- logical record length data format
ported monthly arrests to the Uniform Crime
Reporting Division of the Federal Bureau of Part 1
Investigation. Class IV Youth information form (YIF)
rectangular tile structure
Universe: Juveniles arrested by police be- 78,005 cases
tween January 1974 and December 1984 in 118 variables
the state of New York and in Philadelphia, 138-unit-long record
Pennsylvania 1 record per case
Sampling: Juvenile arrests reported by police Part 2
between January 1974 and December 1984 Information collection and research
In New York City, upstate New York, and evaluation form (ICARE)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The monthly data rectangular file structure
for Philadelphia were collected to serve as a 102,280 cases
control series for comparison with the New 172 variables
York series. 235-unlt-long record
1 record per case
Extent of collection: 1 data file
Delinquency 137
whom the child was living at the time of the in- Part 4
cident, family disruptions, and who reported Adult criminality
the abuse or neglect) and on the perpetrator rectangul~r file structure
of the Incident (relation to abused/neglected, 2,578 cases
age, race, sex, and whether living In the a variables
home of the victim). Part 4 contains Informa- aO-unit-long record
tion on the charges flied within adult arrest In- 1 record per case
cidents (occasion for arrest, mUltiple counts of
the same type of charge, year and location of Part 5
arrest, and type of offense or charge), and Juvenile criminality
Part 5 Includes Information on the ~harges rectangular file structure
filed within jwenlle arrest Incidents (year of ju- 1,101 cases
venile charge, number of arrests, and type of 5 variables
offense or charge). The unit of analysis for aD-unit-long record
Parts 1 through 3 Is the Individual at age 11 or 1 record per case
younger, for Part 4 the charge within the adult
arrest Incldont, and for Part 5 the charge
within the jwenlle arrest Incident. Class IV
Wo~gang, Marvin E., Robert M. Flgllo, and
Universe: All children under 12 years of ago
during the period 1967-1972 in a metropolitan Thorsten Sell;n
area in the Midwest. Delinquency In a birth cohort In
Sampling: Prospective cohorts research design Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
matched with a control group cohort. 1945-1963: Individual file
(ICPSR 7729)
Note: The data contain duplicate case num-
bers. Parts 2 and 3 appear to contain a large
amount of missing data. The data apply only Delinquency in a birth cohort In
to reported and substantiated cases of child- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
hood victimization. Misdemeanor criminal be- 1945-1963: Offenses file
havior for individuals may not show up In the (ICPSR 7729)
records checked.
Part 3
Family and perpetrator
rectangular file structure
90a cases
30 variables
aO-unit-long record
2 records per case
Delinquency 139
Governmental response to crime
Jacob, Herbert with 1 card per case. The state laws file has
45 variables and 533 cases with 2 cards per
Governmental responses to crime In case. The media data flies concern attentive-
the United States, 1948-1978 ness to crime and criminal Justice Issues as
covers In the news media. The 9 city files (for
(ICPSR 8076) all cities with the exception of Newark) have
140 variables and approximately 670 cases
ThIs study was sponsored by the United States each. There are 3 cards per case, Class II
Depmment of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number Is 78-NI-AX-0096.
Summary: The Governmental Responses to
Crime ProJect was Initiated In October, 1978, Pogue, Thomas F.
as a result of the rising crime rate In the
United States and the wide variety of pro- Deterrent effects of arrests and
grams seeking to contain It. The project Inves- Imprisonment In the United States,
tigated the growth of crime and the ways In 1960-1977
which local governments responded to crime
during the period from 1948 to 1978 by ana- (ICPSR 7973)
lyzing policy responses to the rise In crime In
10 American cities: Atlanta, Boston, Houston, This study was sponsored by the United States
Indianapolis, Minneapolis, Newark, Oakland, Department of JU$~ce, National Institute of Jus-
Philadelphia, Phoenix and San Jose. The ma- tice. The grant number!s 79-NJ-AX-001S.
Jor areas of research Included the nature of
the rise In crime In the United States, atten- Summary: Emerging from the tradition of
tiveness to crime, connections between struc- econometric models of deterrence and crime,
tures and patterns of urban governments and this study attempts to obtain Improved esti-
their responses to crime, and urban communi- mates of how crime rates are affected by the
ties' principal responses to crime. This data apprehension and punishment of persons
collection Is contained In 5 parts: Baseline, charged with criminal activity. this stUdy em-
Ten Cltt, Local Ordinances, State Laws, and ploys avallable statistical toohnlques to esti-
Media Data. There are eighteen files: five con- mate relationships between $anction levels
taln SPSS control statement~ and the remain- and reported crime rates for particular geo-
Ing thirteen filas contaln the corresponding graphic areas (states and Standard Metropoli-
data The base/lne data file contalns Informa- tan Statistical Areas-SMSAs) and to assess
tion on all cities having a population of 50,000 the extent to which estimated relationships
or more In 1950, 1960, or 1970. These data can be plausibly Interpl'eted as evidence that
constitute a base/lne with which the 10 cities the sanctions have deterrent effects. Exploit-
can be compared to other cities In the United Ing a richer data base than has been pre-
States. There are 57 variables and 12 276 viously available In limited cross-sectional
cases with 3 cards per case. The ten ~ity file s('.lmplas,lt was possible to test far lags in the
contalns Information on changes In the activi- response of crime rates to sanction levels'
ties, focus, and resources of local police de- the stability of the relationships estimated '
partments, courts, prosecutorlal systems, and from data for Individual cross section years;
correctional Institutions In the 10 cities named and the hypothesis that adults respond differ-
above. There are approximately 58 variables ently to sanctions than do juveniles. Only
and 310 cases, with 3 cards per case (10 cit- property crimes (burglary, larceny, robbery,
les, 31 observations). The city ordinance and and auto theft) were considered. this data
state law files contaln data on public policy re- collection is contained In two files. State Data
sponses from examination of changes In ordi- consists of a state data panel of observations
nances and laws over time. The city ordi- from each of the 50 states covering the years
nance fila has 37 variables, and 422 cases 1960-1977. The approximately 484 variables
Sampling: The sample consists of 19 repre· Clinard, Marshall B. and Peter C. Yeager
sentative cities In the United States. Illegal corporate behavior, 1975·1976
Note: The data collection is a pooled time·se· (lCPSR 7855)
ries of cross·sections: data are presented for
the years 1970·1980, although data for 1969 This study was sponsored by the United States
are available for a limited number of vari- Department of Justice, Na1lon~ Institute of Jus-
ables. The three files supply data for varying tice. The grant number is 77·NI·GG·OOO9.
units of time (months, quarter, years).
Summary: This twa·part study represents the
Extent of collection: 3 data files first large·scale comprehensive Investigation
of corporate violations. It examines the extent
Logical record length data format and nature of these illegal activities In terms
of the corporate structure and economic set·
ting in Which the violations occurred. The
Baumer, Terry and Michael D. Carrington Note: The Incident-based file Includes
merged data of victim offices from the office-
Robbe,y of financial Institutions In based file, robbery Incident data, and case
Indiana, 1982-1984 disposition data The merged office data con·
tain variables Identical to those available In
(ICPSR 9310) the office-based file.
This study was sponsored by the United States Extent of collection: 2 data files
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grant number Is 83-IJ-CX-0056. Card Image data format
Summary: The goals of this data collection Part 1
were to provide information on robbery-re- Bank office data
lated security measures employed by finan- rectangular file structure
clallnstitutions, to Identify factors that contrib- 358 cases
ute to robbery, and to study the correlates of 194 variables
case disposition and sentence length of con- 80-unlt-long record
victed robbers. The collection compares bank- 4 records per case
Ing Institutions that have been robbed with
those bank offices that have not been robbed Part 2
to provide information on factors that contrib- Robbery incident data
ute to these robberies. The office-based file in- rectangular file structure
cludes variables designed to measure gen- 223 cases
eral office characteristics, staff preparation 364 variables
and tralnlng, security measures, charac- BO-unit-Iong record
teristics of the area In which the banking Insti- 8 records per case
tution is located, and the robbery history of
each institution. The Incident-based file in- Related Publication:
cludes variables such as the robber's method Baumer, Terry, Michael D. Carrington, and
of operation and behavior, the employees' re- Emily Marshman
actions, the characteristics of the office at the "The robbery of financial institutions" (final
time of the robbery, and the apprehension of report). Washington, DC: Nat~onallnstitute
the offender. Also included Is Information on of Justice, 1986.
the status of the investigation, reasons in-
volved in solving the robbery, status of prose-
cution, ultimate prosecution, and length of
sentence. Class IV
Bennett, Richard R.
Universe: Banking and financial institutions in
Indiana. Correlates of crime: A study of 52
nat/ons, 1960-1984
Sampling: Victim institutions include banks (ICPSR 9258)
and savings and loan associations in the
state of Indiana that were robbed between Summary: This collection contains data on
January 1, 1982 and June 30, 1984. A com- crime and on relevant social, economic, and
parison group of 200 financial Institutions was political measures hypothe:::ized to be related
randomly selected from the remaining nonvle- to crime for 52 nations OW" ~ 25-year period.
tim offices in Indiana. Five of the nonvietim These time-series data are divided into five
sample were not Included In the file because substantive areas: offense, offender, and na-
their data were not available. tional social, political, and economic data Na-
Part 2
Tanzania to Fiji data
rectangular file structure
26 cases Bureau of the Census,
63 variables U.S. Department of Commerce
80-unit-long record Census of population and housing,
150 records per case
1970 [United States]: Persons In
Related Publications: Institutions and other group quarters
Bennett, Richard R., and Louise Shelley by age, sex, race, and Spanish origin
·Criminalite et developpement econo-
mlque: Une analyse Internatlonale longitu- (ICPSR 8342)
dinale." Anna/es de Vacresson 22 (1985),
13-31. Census of population and housing,
Simon, Rita J., and Sandra Baxter 1980 [United States]: Group quarters
Women and violent crime. Beverly Hills, population by age, sex, race, and
CA: Sage Publications, 1989. Spanish origin
(ICPSR8341)
Part 2
Counties data dictionary
Bureau of the Census,
rectangular file structure
U.S. Department of Commerce 98-unlt-long record
County and city data book [United
States},1988
Part 3
Counties footnotes
(ICPSR 9251) rectangular file structure
19-unlt-long record
Summary: This collection presents in com-
puter-readable form the data Items used to Part 4
produce the corresponding printed volume of Cities data
the COUNTY AND CITY DATA BOOK, i988. rectangular file structure
Included Is a broad range of statistical Infor- 1,008 cases
mation, made avallable by federal agencies 132 variables
and national associations, for counties, cities, 1,498-unit-long record
and places. Information also is provided for 1 record per case
the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and for
the United States as a whole. The dataset is Part 5
comprised of seven files: a county file, a city Cities data dictionary
file, and a place file, with footnote files and rectangular file structure
data dictionaries for both the county and t'1e 86-unit-long record
city files. The county data file contains infor-
mation on areas such as age, agriculture, Part 6
banking, construction, crime, education, fed- Cities footnotes
eral expenditures, personal income, popula- rectangUlar file structure
tion, and vital statistics. Tha city data file in- 20-unlt-long record
cludes variables such as city government,
climate, crime, housing, labor force and em- Part 7
ployment, manUfactures, retail trade, and Places data
service Industries. Included In the place data rectangUlar file structure
file are items on population and money In- 9,593 cases
come. Class IV 4 variables
125-uoit-long record
Universe: The universe varies from item to 1 record per case
item within the files, e.g., all persons, all hous-
ing units, all local governments, etc.
Extent of collection: 14 data files Logical record length and card image data
formats
Card Image and logical recOl'd length data
formats Part 1
Arrest, 1984
Parts 1,3,5,7,9,11,13 rectangular file structure
Arrest files, 19n·1983 3,125 cases
rectangular file structure 19 variables
3,124 to 3,129 cases per part 83-unit-long record
19 variables 1 record per case
B2-unit-long record
1 record per case Part 2
Offenses,1984
Parts 2,4,6,B,1 0,12,14 rectangular file structure
Offenses files, 19n·1983 3,119 cases
rectangular file structure 17 variables
3,123 to 3,127 cases per part BO-unit-Iong record
17 variables 1 record per case
BO-unlt-Iong record
1 record per case Related Publication:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Depart-
Related Publication: ment of Justice
Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Depart- "Uniform crime reporting handbook."
ment of Justice Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Print-
"Uniform crime reporting handbook." ing Office, 1980.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Print-
Ing Office, 1980.
Note: Data have been aggregated to the Universe: All law enforcement agencies in the
county level. Within each county, data fer United States.
agencies reporting six to eleven months of in-
formation were weighted to produce 12- Sampling: Counties were selocted in order to
month equivalents. Agencies reporting less match those chosen for the National Judi·
than six months of data were excluded from cial Reporting Program, 1988 (ICPSR
the aggregation. Data from agencies report- 9449) sponsored by the U.S. Dept. of Justice,
ing only statewide figures were allocated to Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Part 4
Crimes reported, 1988
Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. rectangular file structure
Department of Justice 2,944 cases
Uniform crime reports: County level 17 variables
73-unlt-long record
detailed arrest and offense data, 1988 1 record per case
(ICPSR 9335)
Related Publications:
Summary: The flies In this collection contaln Federal BUi'eau of Investigation
counts of arrests and offenses for Part I and "Uniform crime reporting handbook."
Part II offenses: murder, rape, robbery, as- Washington, DC: U.S. Government Print-
sault, burglary, larceny, auto theft, arson, for- ing Office, 1980.
gery, fraud, embezzlement, vandalIsm, weap- Bureau of Justice Statistics
ons violations, sex offenses, drug and alcohol "Felony sentences In state courts, 1986.·
abuse violations, gambling, vagrancy, curfew Wasillngton, DC: U.S. Government Print-
violations, and runaways. County populations ing Office, 1989.
are also reported. Class III
Part 1 PartS
Arre2ts, all ages: 1985 Crimes reported: 1987
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
3,131 casas 3,130 cases
63 variables 17 variables
242-unlt-long record 74-unlt-lon9 record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 14 Part 21
1970 1983
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
1,922,966 cases 2,022,190 cases
35 variables 59 variables
aO-unit·long record 159-unit·long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 15 Part 22
1971 1984
rectangular file sb'Ucture rectangular file structure
1,929,476 cases 2,942,304 cases
35 variables 59 variables
80·unlt-long record 159-unlt·long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 16 Part 23
19G8 1985
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
1,930,082 cases 2,089,378 cases
35 variables 53 variables
80-unit-Iong record 159·unit·long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 17 Part 24
1980 1986
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
1,993,137 cases 2,108,384 cases
38 variables 67 variables
86-unit-!ong record 159-unit·long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 18 Part 25
1979 1987
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
1,916,776 cases 2,126,342 cases
38 variables 67 variables
86·unit-long record 159.unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 19
1981
rectangular file structure
1,981,309 cases National Center for Heakh Statistics
59 variables Mortality detail file: External cause
159-unit-long record extract, 1968-1978, 1979·1980
1 record per case
(ICPSR 8224)
Part 5
1972
rectangular file structure
15,832 cases Vandaele, Watter
37 variables Participation In illegitimate activities:
132-unlt-long record Ehrlich revisited, 1960
1 record per case
(ICPSR 8677)
Part 6
1973 ThIs study was sponsored by the UnltOO States
rectangular file structure Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
17,124 cases tice. The grant number Is J-LEAA-006-76.
37 variables
132-unlt-long r~crd Summary: This study re-analyzes Isaac Ehr-
1 record per case lich's 1960 cross-section data on the relation-
ship between aggregate levels of punishment
Part 7 and crime rates. It provides alternative model
1974 specifications and estimations. The study ex-
rectangular file structure amined the deterrent effects of punishment
18,632 cases on seven FBI Index crimes: murder, rape, as-
37 variables sault, larceny, robbery, burglary, and auto
132-unit-long record theft. Socioeconomic variables Include family
1 record per case income, percentage of families earning below
half of the median Income, unemployment
Part 8 rate for urban males In the age groups 14-24
1975 and 35-39, labor force participation rate, edu-
rectangular file structure cational level, percentage of young males
18,642 cases and non-whites In the population, percentage
37 variables of population In the SMSA, sex ratio, and
132-unlt-long record place of occurrence. Two sanction variables
1 record per case are also Included: 1) the probability of Impris-
onment, and 2) the average time served in
Part 9 prison when sentenced (severity of punish-
1976 ment). Also Included are: per capita police ex-
rectangular file structure penditure for 1959 and 1960, and the crime
16,821 cases rates for murder, rape, assault, larceny, rob-
37 variables bery, burglary, and auto theft. Class IV
132-unit-long record
1 record per case Extent of collection: 1 data file
Part 10 logical record length data format
19n
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
18,300 cases 47 cases
37 variables 66 variables
132-unit-long record 501-unlt-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Related Publications:
Ehrlich, I.
"PartiCipation In Illegitimate activities: A
theoretical and empirical investigation."
Journal of Political Economy (May-June
1973),521-565.
Summary: The purpose of this data collection Summary: This data set contains detailed In-
was to determine the seriousness of criminal formation on homicides in eight United States
events. The principal Investigators sought to cities: Philadelphia, Newark, Chicago, St.
determine and rate the relative seriousness of Louis, Memphis, Dallas, Oakland, and "Ash-
murder, rape, and petty theft, Information In ton" (a representative large western city). De-
the collection Includes respondents' opinions taJled characteristics for each homicide, age,
on the severity of particular crimes as well as gender, race, place of birth, marital status, liv·
how that severity compared to other crimes. Ing arrangements, occupation, socioeco-
Class IV nomic status (SES), employment status,
method of assault, location where homicide
Universe: All households In the United States. occurred, relationship 01 victim to olfender, cir-
cumstances surrounding death, precipitation
Sampling: A stratified random sample of or resistance of victim, physical evidence col-
households In the United States. lected, victim's drug history, victim's prior
criminal record, and number of offenders iden-
Note: This data collection was conducted as tified. Data on up to two offenders and three
a supplement to the National Crime Survey: witnesses are also available including the
National Sample over a six-month period be· criminal history, justice system disposition,
ginning In July. 1977. and age, sex, and race 01 each olfender. Infor-
mation on the age, sex, and race of each
Extent of collection: 2 data files witness also was collected as were data on
witness type (police informant, child, eyewit-
Logical record length data format ness, etc.). Finally, Information from the medi-
cal examiner's records including results of
Part 1 narcotics and blood alcohol tests of the victim
1977 collection quarter 3 are provided. Class IV
rectangular file strUcture
30,000 cases Universe: Cases in the United States defined
204 variables by each city's police department and medical
1OS-unlt-Iong record examiner as homicide.
8 records per case
Sampling: A purposive sample of eight cities
Part 2 was selected based on geographic region,
1977 collectioi1 quarter 4 population size, and whether their eleven-
rectangular file structure year homiclde trend Hne followed or diverged
30,000 cases from respective regional trend lines. Dallas,
204 variables St. LOUis, and VAshton" diverged from re-
1OS-unit-Iong record gional patterns, while the other cities In the
8 records per case sample-Philadelphia, Newark, Chicago,
Police 167
found In other publications. Also, the total for the traffic stops Include manner of Investl·
number of agencies Is the result of the gatlon, Incident coda, officers' description of
weighted sample and not an exact count of all the incident, condition of the vehicle stopped,
agencies nationwide. During the course of police contact with the passengers of the vehi-
data collection, the sampling frame was found cle, demeanor of passengers to the pollee, de-
to be deflclmt In Texas because a number of meanor of police to the passengers, resolu-
constable offices had not been Included. A tion of the situation, and others. The data
systematic sample of one-fourth of these of- were collected based on field observation, us-
fices was added to the survey. ing an in strum ant tor recording observations.
The data were sampled based on a stratified
Extent of collection: 1 data fila + machine- sample by precinct and shift. The logical record
readable documentation + SPSS control length of each file Is BO. Class IV
cards
OSIRIS and card Image data formats, with
SPSS cootrol cards for each
Berk, Richard A. and Lawrence W.
rectangular file structure Sherman
2,907 cases Specific deterrent effects of arrest for
508 variables
1,434-unlt-long record domestic assault: Minneapolis,
21 records per case 1981~1982
(ICPSR 8250)
Related Publication:
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice
Programs This study was sponsored by the United States
'Profiles of state and local law enforce- Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
ment agencies, 1987." Bureau of Justice tice. The grant number Is BO-IJ·CX-0042.
Statistics Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S.
Summary: This data collection contalns data
Government Printing Office, n.d.
on 330 domestio Violent events. The data
were collected between March 1981 and Sep-
tember 1982. There are several parts to this
collection. The first deals with Information
Bayley, David about domestic assault incidents taken from
the persons involved in such incidents. Inter-
Effectiveness of police response: views were conducted with all parties to the
Denver, 1982 domestic assault. Included here are such
(ICPSR 8217) items as socioeconomic and demographic at-
tributes of the suspect and victim, their rela-
tionship (husband, wife, boyfriend, girlfriend,
This study was sponsored by the United States lover, divorced, separated), the nature of the
Department of Justice, National lnsmute of Jus- argument that spurred the assault, the pres-
tice. The grant number is 81-IJ·CX-0082. ence or absence of physical violence, and the
nature and extent of police contact in the Inci-
Summary: The nature of police behavior in dent. In addition to data on the individuals in-
problematic situations encountered by patrol volved In the disputes, police arrest records
personnel, primarily disturbances and traffic were also documented. The date of the
stops, Is Investigated In thIs data collection. crime, the ethnlcity of the participants, the
The site for the data collection was Denva', presence or absence of alcohol or drugs, a
Colorado; information was gathered In the pe- weapon, and a police assault In the incident
riod from June to September, 1982. The da- were also recorded. This data collection has
taset contains two files. The first Is for distur- nine files and there are over 100 variables.
bance encounters, and contains data for 92 Class IV
cases and 404 variables. The second liIe Is
for trafflc stops; it has 164 cases, and 210
variables. The variables for disturbances in-
clude type of disturbance, manner of investi-
gation, designation of police response, sev-
eral situational variables such as type of
setting, number of victims, bYf:tanders, sus-
pects, and witnesses, demeanor of police to-
ward participants, and others. The variables
Police 171
Universe: Homicides and violent crimes in charge reductions or dismissals due to evi·
five small California jurisdictions. dentiary problems. The data were designed
to permit an assessment of the effectiveness
Sampling: Separate gang-designated and of two experimental police evidence collection
non·gang·designated samples were selected programs Implemented on April 1, 1985. One
from cases that included at least one named of these was an Investigative and post·arrest
or described suspoct between the ages of 10 procedural guide. The other was an Individual·
and 30. ized feedback report prepared by prosecutors
for police officers. The officer file Includes In·
Extent of collection: 2 data flies formation on each officer's sex and race,
length of police service, and assignment
Card image data format changes during the study period. Data on the
offender and the case files include time of ar·
Part 1 rest, Information on arresting offiCEr, original
Incidents investigating officer and principal investigating
rectangular file structure offiCEr, offense and victim Gharacteristics, ar-
273 cases restee characteristics, available evidence,
94 variables case processing Information, and arrestee's
80·unit·long record criminal history. Class IV
1 record per case
Universe: All police officers In the Baltimore
Part 2 County Police Department and all felonies
Participants committed between April 1, 1984 and Novem-
rectangular file structure ber 30,1985 in Baltimore County, Maryland.
1,006 cases
8 variables Sampling: The sample for the officer file con-
aO·unit-long record sisted of all police officers on patrol in four
1 record per case shifts In the Western and Eastern Divisions of
the Baltimore County Police Department dur-
Related Publications: Ing the period April 1, 1984 through Novem-
I<lein, M.W., M.A. Gordon, and C.L. Maxson ber 30, 1985. The target population was all
"The impact of pollr.e inVestigations on po. felony cases (except homicide, rape/other
lice·reported rates of gang and non·gang sex offenses, and child abuse) from police
homicides: Criminology 24 (1986), 489· and prosecutor records for the time period
512. April 1, 1984 through November 30, 1984 and
Klein, M.W., M.A. Gordon, and C.L. Maxson April 1, 1985 through November 30, 1985.
"Differences between gang and non·gang
homicides." Criminology 23 (1985), 209· Note: For reasons of confidentiality police offi-
222. cer badge numbers wtJre replaced with
Klein, M.W., C.L. Maxson, and M.A. Gordon unique identifiers In each of the flies. Data on
"Evaluation of an imported gang violence the individualized feedback report should not
deterrence program: Final report: Univer· be used for purposes of analysis due to prob-
sity of Southern California, 1984. lems in implementing this portion of the study.
Police 173
Related Publication: Orne, Martin T. and Wayne G. Whnehouse
McCampbell, M.S.
"Fjeld training for police officers: State of Use and effectiveness of hypnosis and
the art" (research in brief). Washington, the cognitive Interview for enhancing
DC: National Institute of Justice, 1986. eyewitness recall: Philadelphia,
1988-1989
(lCPSR 9478)
Monkkonen, Eric
This study was sponsored by the United States
Police departments, arrests and crime Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
In the United States, 186()"1920 tice. The grant number is 87 -IJ-CX-0052.
Card imags data format and SPSSX export Summary: The dataset contains two related
files studies conducted in the metropolitan areas
of st. Louis, Missouri; Tampa - St. Peters-
Part 1 burg, Florida; and RochestEJ", New York. The
Baseline and treatment data file study of police referral practices provides in-
rectangular file structure formation on the types of calls made to police
72 cases departments, the referrals made to social
20 variables service agencies from these calls, and the
SO-un it-long record pattern of citizen demands. Data for this
1 record per case study were collected from 26,465 calls for po-
lice service at 21 police departments. The 36
Part 2 variables include the nature of the call, char-
Post-experimental data file acteristics of the caller, and the type of
rectangular file structure agency receiving the referral. The sampling
72 cases frame for the study of social service agency
5 variables practices was any agency within the three
SO-un it-long record metropolitan areas that agreed to participate
1 record per case in the study, accepted police referrals, and
dealt with at least one of ten selected soclai
Part 3 concerns (e.g., drug abuse, suicide preven-
Baseline and treatment data: SPSSX tion, aid to the elderly). The study classifies
export file agencies according to the extent of their coop-
rectangular file structure eration with the police, the range of the social
72 cases services they provide, and their history of
20 variables service provision. Budget information was
SO-un it-long record also obtained to calculate the costs of alterna-
tive methods of social service delivery. Repre-
Part 4 sentatives of 103 agencies were interviewed
Post-experimental data: SPSSX export file and data were collected for 139 variables.
72 cases Data generated by the Social Service Agency
5 variables questionnaire are available in two machine-
SO-unlt-Iong record readable formats: precoded data and narra-
tive text. Class IV
Related Publication:
Orne, Martin T., and Wayne G. Whitehouse
"The use and effectiveness of hypnosis
and the cognitive interview for enhancing
eyewitness recall." Merion Station, PA: In- Ostrom, BinCX", Roger B. Parks, and
stiMe for Experimental Psychiatry, 1990. Gordon P. Whnaker
Police services study, Phase ", 1977:
Rochester, St. LOUis, and St. Petersburg
(ICPSR S605)
Police 175
Summary: The data for this study were col- Part 2
lected In order to examine the delivery of po- General shift information
lice services In selected neighborhoods. The rectangular file structure
performance of differently organized police 949 cases
agencies were compared as they delivered 170 variables
services to different sets of comparable neigh- 80-unit-long record
borhoods. Variables included In the study are 8 records per case
total number of encounters, number of con-
tacts with other officers, number of contacts Part 3
with non-police support units, characteristics Police encounters data
surrounding specific encounters, and citizen rectangular file structure
satisfaction. Class IV 5,688 cases
594 variables
Note: The entire dataset consists of 19 files: SO-unit-long record
four are currently available. There are several 20 records per case
aspects of the data which require mention: (1)
Column locations and widths of variables Part 4
noted in the data collection coding guides do Victimization survey data
not describe the data in its present format. rectangular file structure
Some of the variables noted in these coding 12,019 cases
guides have also been deleted from the data. 273 variables
Users should refer to the SPSS-X control SO-unit-Iong record
cards provided or the SPSS-X DISPLAY DIC- 6 records per case
TIONARY program for the current variable list
and column locations. (2) The General Shift Related Publication:
Data file contains a variable named Smith, Douglas A.
TIMERUN. The values for this variable are in- "Invoking the law: Determinants of police
correct. Analysis utilizing the variable will prob- arrest decisions." Unpublished PhD. dis-
ably be misleading. Users of this file will note sertation, Indiana University, 1982.
that 49 shifts are represented twice in the
data This occurred because a single ob-
server was unable to observe a shift in its en-
tirety, thus requiring that the shift be split be-
tween two members of the research team. Pate, Antony M. and Sampson O. Annan
The split shift was then coded as two cases in Community policing In Baltimore,
the data. (3) Value labels are not provided in 1986-1987
the data dictionary files for the variables identi-
fying the observed neighborhoods, because (ICPSR 9401)
these labels are unique in each jurisdiction.
The variables identifying the neighborhoods This study was sponsored by the United States
contain some values which are not identified Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
on the list of jurisdictions and neighborhoods. tice. The grant number is OO-IJ-CX-0003.
These values refer to combinations of neigh-
borhoods. (4) The variable identifying the ob- Summary: This data collection was designed
served shift contains values which are not in- to investigate the effects of foot patrol and om-
cluded in the original format of the variable. It budsman policing on perceptions of the inci-
is not known which shifts these values refer dence of crime and community policing prac-
to. (5) SPSSX control cards are not available tices in Baltimore, Maryland. Data collected at
for Part 4 of the dataset. Wave 1 measured perceptions of crime and
community policing practices before the two
Extent of collection: 4 data files + SPSS con- new policing programs were introduced. Fol-
trol cards low-up data for Wave 2 were collected ap-
proximately one year later and were designed
Card image data format to measure the effects of the new policing
practices. Included on the instrument were
Part 1 questions on the perceived incidence of vari-
Citizen debriefing data ous crimes, police effectiveness and pres-
rectangular file structure ence, disorder, property and personal crime
1,675 cases and the likelihood of crime in general, feelings
152 variables of safety, crime avoidance behaviors and the
80-unlt-long record use of crime prevention devices, cohesion
5 records per case and satisfaction with neighborhoods, and
Police 177
Parts 1-7 filed agalnst the defendant, the manner in
Dala, sections 1·7 which the case was adjudicated (dismissal,
rectangular file structure guilty plea, final case), the final case out-
2Scases come, and the sentence given the defendant.
9 variables There are eight files in this dataset. Each of
SO-unlt-Iong record the four cities has one file for cases with
1 record per case physical evidence and one file for cases
where physical evidence was not collected or
Related Publication: examined. The number of cases varies In the
Petersllla, J., A. Abrahamse, and J.Q. Wilson tiles, with the total number of cases being
·Police performance and case attrition." 2,659 and the approximate number of vari-
Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corpora- ables being 120. Each file has a logical re-
tion,19S7. cord length of SO. Class IV
Peterson, Joseph L., Steve Mlhajlovic, and Reiss, Albert J., Jr.
Michael Gilliland
I~ttltudes and perceptions of police
Forensic evidence and the police, officers In Boston, ChIcago, and
1976·1980 Washington, DC, 1966
(ICPSR S186) (ICPSR 90S7)
T1is study was sponsored by the United States This study was sponsored by the United
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- States Department of Justice, Office of Law
tice. The grmt number is 82-IJ-CX-0064. Enforcement Assistance. The grant number Is
OLEA-006.
Summary: The data in this collection focus on
adult cases in the serious crime categories of Summary: This survey was designed to ex-
homicide (and related death Investigations), plore perceptions and attitudes of police offi-
rape, robbery, aggravated assaulVbattery, bur- cers of three metropolitan areas toward their
glary, and arson. Data for four cities are In- work and the organizations and publics with
cluded In this dataset: Peoria, Chicago, Kan- which they Interact. Issues of interest Include
sas City, and Oakland. A sampling approach (1) the nature of police careers and police
was used In Chicago, Oakland, and Kansas work and officers' satisfaction with their jobs,
City, the largest jurisdictions, while all crimes (2) officers' orientations toward policing tasks
processed by the crime laboratory In Peoria and their relationships with the public, and (3)
were Included. Three sources are used for officers' perceptions of organizations and sys-
the collection: police, court, and laboratory re- tems that influence or change police work.
cords. The primary source Is police case tiles. Class IV
These tiles consist of all reports submitted by
police personnel during an Investigation of a Universe: Police officers in major metropoli-
suspected criminal offense, including the in- tan areas of the United States.
itial report taken by the responding patrol offi-
cer, the detective's reports, all follow-up sup- Sampling: Three sample cities (Chicago, Bos-
plemental reports, statements taken from ton, and Washington, DC) were purposively
witnesses and possible suspects, arrest re- selected to represent differences in the size,
ports, a detailed report describing the evi- location, degree of control, and type of organi-
dence collected by the evidence technician, zation in police departments. Within each city,
and other documents. Crime laboratory re- two police precinctrl (four in Washington, DC)
ports are also Included in this dataset. These with high crime rates were selected to repre-
tiles contaln information identifying the evi- sent areas with different race and class com-
dence submitted, the examiner's work sheets positions. The selected sites were (1) Boston,
and notes, photographs, the final laboratory MA (Dorchester and Roxbury precincts), (2)
results of the sclentisrs examinations, and Chicago, IL (Fillmore and Town Hall pre-
often notes made by the scientist of conversa- cincts), and (3) Washington, DC (precincts 6,
tions with investigating officers. Finally, prose- 10,13, and 14). Simple random samples of
cutor or COLirt files were reviewed for informa- approximately 25 police officers In each of the
tion regarding the dispositions of suspects eight precincts were drawn from department
who were arrested and formally charged. The rosters. The response rate was nearly 100
records provide the initial and final charges percent.
Police 179
Extent of collection: 5 data files + OSIRIS Reiss, Albert J., Jr.
dictionaries
SUivey of victimization and attitudes
logical record length data format towards crime and law enforcement In
Boston and Chicago, 1966
Part 1
General data: Observers' summaries of (ICPSR 9085)
recorded encounters
rectangular file structure this study was sponsored by the United
840 cases States Department of Justice, Office of Law
679 variables Enforcement Assistance. The grant number Is
868-unlt-long record OLEA-OOO.
1 record per case
Summary: This data collection was designed
Part 2 to explore attitudes toward crime and the po-
Police initiated encounters lice and to examlrle factors related to criminal
rectangular file structure victimization and the reporting of crime Inci-
738 cases dents to the police. It combines a victimization
752 variables survey with data on citizens' attitudes toward
939-unlt-long record crime and the police ond Information on be-
1 record per case havior In response to crime or the threat of
crime. Variables provide Information about
Part 3 neighborhood characteristics, Individual
Citizen initiated contacts with police in demographic attributes (e.g. age, race, gen-
field areas der, edUcation, Income, religion, marital
rectangular file structure status), perception of crime, social environ-
282 cases ment, the criminal justice system, experi-
721 variables ences with the police, criminal victimization
907-unlt-long record experiences, protective measures taken, vic-
1 record per case tim·offender relationship, characteristics of
the crime Incident, police response to crime
Part 4 reports, and victim perceptions of and satis-
Police dispatch records faction with police response. Clrus IV
rectangular file structure
6,172 cases Universe: The adult population (any house-
25 variables hold member 18 years or older) In major met-
43-unit-long record ropolitan areas of the United States.
1 record per case
Sampling: Precincts were selected to repre-
PartS sent high and low Income populations living in
Service-called initiated encounter high crime areas. Within areas, probability
rectangular file structure samples werF3 drawn. The sites selected were
4,371 cases Boston, MA (Dorchester and Roxbury pre-
719 variables cincts) and Chicago, IL (Fillmore and Town
900-unit-long record Hall precincts).
1 record per case
Note: While OSIRIS dictionaries providing
Related Publications: variable locations and abbreviated variable la-
Friedrich, R.J. bels accompany both files In this collection,
"The impact of organizational, individual, only Part 1, Contact Data, is documented by
and situational factors on police behavior." a codebook. The only additional documenta-
Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Depart- tion available for Part 2, Resident Data, is a
ment of Political Science, University of facsimile of the original coding form. There is,
Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1977. however, considerabie overlap between the
Reiss, A.J., Jr. two parts, and the Contact Data codebook
The police and the public. New Haven, can be used for Resident Data also. Many of
CT: Yale University Press, 1971. the variables were originally coded as
Reiss, A.J., Jr. OSIRIS "multiple response" variables. When
"Systematic observation of natural social a program such as SPSS translates the
phenomena." In Herbert L Costner (ed.), OSIRiS dictionary, it converts the multiple
Sociological Methodology, 1971. San categories into variables, thus expanding the
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 1971. total number of variables In the dataset. The
Extent of collection: 2 data flies + OSIRIS Summary: These data measure the etfects of
dictionaries blood alcohol content coupled with officer re-
ports at the time of arrest on driVing while in-
logical record length data format toxicated (OWl) case outcomes Qury verdicts
and guilty pleas). Court records and relevant
Part 1 police reports for drunk driving cases drawn
Contact data from the greater metropolitan areas of Bos-
rectangular file structure ton, Denver, and Los Angeles were complied
343 cases to produce this data collection. Cases were
1,836 variables selected to Include roughly equal proportions
1,925·unlt·long record of guilty pleas, guilty verdicts, and not guilty
1 record per case verdicts. OWl cases were compared on the
quality and quantity of evidence concerning
Part 2 the suspect's b!1havlor, with the evidence
Resident data coming from any mention of 20 standard vis-
rectangular file structure ual detection cues prior to the stop, 13 attrib-
1,469 cases utes of general appearance and behavior Im-
1,469 variables mediately after the stop, and the results of as
1,986·unlt·long record many as seven field sobriety tests. Questions
1 record per case Included driving under the Influence cues
(scoring sheet), observed traffic violations
Related Publications: and actual traffic accidents, the verdict, DWI
Reiss, A.J., Jr. (ed.) history, whether the stop resulted from an ac-
"Studies In crime and law enforcement In cident, whether the attorney was public or pri-
major metropolitan areas." U.S. Presi- vate, and sanctions that followed the verdict.
dent's Commission on Law Enforcement Also Included were demographic questions
and the Administration of Justice Field Sur- on age, sex, and ethnlcity. Class IV
vey III, Vol. I, Section I. Washington, DC:
United States Government Printing Office, Extent of collection: 1 data file + machine-
1967. readable documentation
Reiss, A.J., Jr. (ad.)
"Studies In crime and law enforcement In Card Image data format
major metropolitan areas." U.S. Presi-
dent's Commission on Law Enforcement rectangular file structure
and the Administration of Justice Field Sur- 617 cases
vey III, Vol. I, Section iI. Washington, DC: 112 variables
United States Government Printing Office, 77-unit·long record
1967. 2 records per case
Related Publication:
Berger, D.E., J.R. Snortum, R.J. Homel, R.
Hauge, and W. Loxley
"Oaterrence and prevention of alcohol-Im-
paired driving In Australia, the United
States, and Norway." Justice Quarterly 7
(1989),453-465.
Police 181
Berger, D.E., J.R. Snortum, R.J. Homel, R. Stillman, Frances A.
Hauge, and W. Loxley
·Soclal, cultural, and legal Influences on aI· Concerns of police sUlVlvors, 1986:
cohol-Impalred driving: compliance In Aus- [United states]
tralia, the United States, and Norway."
Chicago, IL: Paper presented at T89 • In- (ICPSR 9327)
ternational Conference on Alcohol, Drugs,
and Traffic Safety, October 1989. This study was sponsored by the United States
Snortum, J.R., et aI. Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
·Pollce documentation of drunk driving ar- tice. The grant number Is 85-IJ-CX-0012.
rests: Jury verdicts and gUilty pleas as a
function of quantity and quality of evl- Summary: This data collection was designed
dance." Journal Of Criminal Justice 18 to assess the Impact of IIne-of-duty deaths of
(1990),99-116. law enforcement officers on their family mem-
bers In terms of the psychological, emotional
and financial effects. To assess the Impact of
the traumatic event, a wide varlet)! of clinical
and psychiatric measures of psychological
Spelman, WIlliam and Dale K Brown disorder were used. The data are stored In
two files. Included In the first file are variables
Calling the police: CItizen reporting of concerning the respondents' personal charac-
sorlous crime, 1979 teristics such as age, sex, ethnic origin marl·
(ICPSR 8185) tal status, educational level, relationship to
deceased offlca', and employment. Also In-
Tfls study was sponsored by the United States cluded are the deceased officer's demo-
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- graphic characteristics such as age at time of
tice. The grant number Is 78-NI-AX-0107. death, sex, ethnic origin, educatIonal level,
number of times married, number of years In
Summary: This dataset replicates the citizen law enforcement, and date and time of the In-
reporting component of the Kansas City, Mis- claent. Also Included are experiences and
souri Police Department's Response 11me emotional reactions to the death of the officer
Analysis. Information Is Included on 3,300 re- and clinical symptoms of psychological dis-
ported crime Incidents of aggravated asflault, tress. The second tile contains variables on
motor vehicle theft, burglary, larceny-theft, the respondent's relationship with friends and
forcible rape, and robbery. The data cover citi- relatives before and after the traumatic avant
zen calls to police between April 21 and De- behavioral changes of survivors' children fol- '
cember 7, 1979. There are four files to this da- lewlng the death, financial Impacts on survi-
taset, one each for Jacksonville, Florida; vors, and satisfaction with treatment and re-
Peoria, Illinois; Rochester, New York; and sponses recalved from police departments.
San Diego, California The data are taken Class IV
from police dispatch records and Interviews of
citizens requesting police assistance. The Universe: Surviving spouses of police officers
variables taken from the dispatch records In- killed between November 1982 and February
clude the dispatch times, CC\JI priority, police 1986 In the United States.
travel time, age, sex, and race of the calla', re-
sponse code, number of suspects, and aroa Restrictions: Data also were collected on the re-
of t!1e city In which the call originated. The actions of pollee department offlclcals but this
variables taken from the citizen Interviews In- file was not made available for archiving by the
clude res~ondent's r~le In the Incident (Victim, orlginallnvestigallon. For further Information
calla', victim-caller, witness-caller), incident lo- contact the principal Investigator cirectly. '
cation, relationship of caller to victim, number
of victims, Identification of suspect, Interaction Extent of collection: 2 data files
with police, and others. There are approxi-
mately 250 variables In this dataset. Each file Logical record length data format
has a logical record length of 80. Class IV
Part 1
Survivor demographic information
recta'1gular file stnJcture
174 cases
182 variables
244-unit-long record
1 record per case
Summary: Data on police-citizen encounters Sampllng: All cities that had 50,000 or more
were collected to explore the peace keeping residents in 1940 or entered that size ciass
lunctions of the police and their handling of during the study period. All towns and town-
encounters with mentally ill persons. The data ships in Connecticut, MassachUsetts, New
were gathered through observations by re- Jer~ey and Pennsylvania were Included.
searchers riding in police cars in two Chicago
police districts during a 14-month period in Extent of collection: 1 data file
1980-1981. There are two parts to this da-
taset. First, information was collected once Logical record length data format
per shift on the general level of activity during
the shift and the observer's perceptions of rectangUlar file structure
emotions/attitudes displayed by the police offi- 6,944 casas
cers he/she observed. Also, information is in- 216 variables
cluded for each of the 270 shifts about the 80-unit·long record
personal characteristics, work history, and 1 record per case
worl<lng relationships of the police officers ob-
served. The second part of the dataset con-
tains detailed information on each police-citi-
zen encounter including its nature, location,
police actions andlor responses, citizens in-
volved, and their characteristics and behavia.
A unique and consistent shift identification
number is attached to each encounter so that
information about police officer characteristics
from the first ("shift-level") part of the dataset
may be matched with the second ("encounter-
level") part. There are 1,382 police-citizen en-
Police 183
Uchida, Craig D. and Laure W. Brooks Part 2
Calls for service data
Violence against police: Baltimore rectangular file structure
County, Maryland, 1984·1986 15,916 cases
4 variables
(lCPSR 9347) 80·unlt·long record
1 record per case
This study was sponsored by the United States
Depa1ment of Justice, Natlon~ Institute of Jus· Related Publication:
tice. The gra1t number is 86·IJ·CX·OO22. Uchida, C.D., and L.W. Brooks
"Violence against the police: Assaults on
Summary: This data collection examines Indi- Baltimore County police officers." Unpub-
vidual and situational characteristics of nonfa· lished Final Report submitted to the Na-
tal assaults on police officers In the Baltimore tional Institute of Justice. College Park,
County Police Department. In the assault MD: University of Maryland, 1988.
data, variables Include (1) Information on the
officer such as age, race, sex, height, weight,
education, rank, assignment, years of experi·
ence, weapon, and Injury sustained, (2) Infor·
mation on the offender(s) such as age, race, Uchida, Craig D. and Timothy S. Bynum
sex, height, weight, weapon, Injury sustained,
and arrest status, and (3) Information on the Effects of "United states vs. Leon" on
actual situation and Incident itself such as police search warrant practices,
type of call anticipated, type of call encoun· 1984·1985
tered, type of location, numbers of persons
present (by role, e.g., assaulter, nonassaulter, (ICPSR 9348)
complainant, etc.), type of initial officer action
actions of suspect before assault, sabri· ' This study was sponsored by the United States
ety/drug use by suspects, and final disposl· Department of Justice, National Inst~ute of Jus-
tion. The calls for service data were collected tice. The grant number is as·IJ·CX·Q015.
to provide an indication of the frequency of
various types of calls. In these data, variables Summary: This data collection examines the
include time of call, Initial call category, dispo· impact of the Supreme Court decision In
sitlon code, and sheet 10. Class IV "UNITED STATES VS. LEON" on police
search warrant applications In seven jurisdic-
Universe: All calls for service in Baltimore tions. For this collection, which is one of the
County, Maryland from 1984 through 1986. few data collections currentiy available for the
study of warrant activities, data were gath-
Sampling: For the Calls for Service Data file ered from search warrant applications filed
an activity sample was based on calls for po. during a three·month period before the Leon
lice services that were received between decision and three months after it. Each war-
January 1,1987 and March 31,1987. From rant application can be tracked through the
this 90-day period, 14 days of calls were ran- criminal justice system to Its disposition. The
domly selected. file contains variables on the contents of the'
warrant such as rank of applicant, specific
Extent of collection: 2 data files area of search, offense type, material sought
basis of evidence, status of Informants, and '
Logical record length data format reference to good faith. Additional variables
concern the results of the warrant application
Part 1 and include items such as materials seized,
Assaults data arrest made, cases charged by prosecutor,
rectangular file structure type of attorney, whether a motion to sup-
1,550 cases press the warrant was filed, outcomes of mo-
11 0 variabl es tions, appeal status, and number of arres-
408-unit·long record tees. Class IV
1 record per case
Universe: All search warrants filed in the
United States In 1984 and 1985.
Police 185
Victimization
Bureau of Justice Statistics, cldent records Is 181. There are 172 vari·
U.S. Department of Justice abies and 39 files.
Commercial victimization surveys, The National Sample data collection has 18
1973·1975 [United States]: Cities liIes. The total number of cases is 188,271.
sample The data are fixed-length with a logical record
length of 230 characters. There are a total of
(ICPSR 8002} 203 variables. Class II
Victimization 187
For each year, the data are organized by city Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S.
Into 39 separate datasets. Each dataset Is hi- Department of Justice
erarchically structured In three levels. There
are 43 variables for an average of 6,028 National crime surveys: Crime school
households, 38 variables for an average of supplement, 1989
9,039 persons, and 199 variables for an aver-
age of 3, 138 Incidents per city per year. (lCPSR 9394)
Person level filo: The Archive has also com- Summary: This supplement to the National
pleted a person-Ieval subset file from the Na- Crime Surveys was designed to collect data
tional Crime Surveys: CIties Sample, 1972- on crime victimization In schools throughout
1975 (Complete Sample) dataset (ICPSR the United States. Student respondents were
7658). This subset was created In order to asked a series of questions to determine their
provide users with a file which Is easier to school attendance In the last six months.
work with but which preserves the charac- Other questions concerning their schools
teristics of the Cities Sample data In creating were posed including type of school, distance
this person-level file, a full sample of victims from home, and general attendance and
and a ten percent sample of non-victims for monitoring policies. The data include informa-
up to four Incidents was employed. Thus, a tion on response of school to student violation
maximum of four Incidents per victim have of rules, accessibility of drugs, and violence In
been retained in the subset file; the remain- school Including types of violence and stu-
der of the incidents were dropped from the dent reaction. Other variables cover general
file. In the entire Cities Sample, approxi- violent crimes, parsonallarceny crimes, and
mately 97 percent of the respondents in each household crimes and include information on
quarter report four or fewer incidents. These date, time, and place of crime. Demographic
data are in a rectangulcr, or flattened, file so characteristics of household members such
that for each incident retrieved for a respon- as age, sex, race, education, employment,
dent all of the variables in the incident record median family Income, and marital status are
are repeated as many times as there are inci- provided. Class III
dents. For respondents with fewer than four
incidents, the incident record variables will Universe: All persons In the United States 12
contaln missing data where Incidents did not years of age and older.
occur. There Is one subset file for each of the
26 cities represented in the Complete Cities Sampling: Stratified multistage cluster sample.
Sample. The person-level files are appropri-
ate for the analysis of victims or personal vic- Extent of collection: 1 data file
timizations. The data contain 877 variables.
As part of Its quality control procedures, Logical record length data format
ICPSR undertook a study using this data col-
lection to determine whether It CQuid replicate rectangular file structure
published figures from Bureau of Justice Sta- 15,353 cases
tistics (BJS) publications. Based on results of 319 variables
the analysis, ICPSR concluded that the BJS 536-unit-long record
datsets accurately represent published fig- 1 record per case
ures. The replication study was done on the
crime of robbery and used figures from the
three publications identified in Appendix E of
the the documentation for this collection. Re- Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S.
sults of comparisons of datset-derived esti-
mates with published estimates are now in- Department of Justice
clude in Appendix F. An attitude supplement National crime surveys: National
sub-sample from this survey is also available
as ICPSR 7663. Class I
sample, 1973·1983
(lCPSR 7635)
Victimization 189
Part 7 Part 52
1979, Incident level 1973 person level, third interview quarter,
rectangular file structure all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up
27,945 casas to iour incidents
337 variables rectangular file structure
549-unlt-long record 13,696 cases
1 record per case 935 variables
1,381-unit-long record
Part 8 1 record per case
1980, incident level
rectangular file structure Part 53
28,469 cases 1973 person level, fourth interview
337 variables quarter, all victims, 10 porcent
549-unlt-long record non-victims, for up to four incidents
1 record per case rectangular file structure
13,989 cases
Part 9 935 variables
1981, incident level 1,381-unit-iong record
rectangular file structure 1 record per case
29,261 cases
337 variables Part 54
549-unit-long record 1974 person level, first interview quarter,
1 record per case all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up
to four incidents
Part 10 rectangular file structure
1982, incident level 12,421 cases
rectangular file structure 935 variables
27,995 cases 1,381-unit-long record
337 variables 1 record per case
549-unlt-long record
1 record per case Part 55
1974 person level, second interview
Part 41 quarter, all victims, 10 percent
1973-1982, incident level: Concatenated non-victims, for up to four incidents
file rectangular file structure
rectangular file structure 12,243 cases
298,766 cases 935 variables
337 variables 1,381-unit-Iong record
549-unit-long record 1 record per case
1 record per case
Part 56
Part 50 1974 person level, third interview quarter,
1973 person level, first interview quarter, all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up
all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up to four incidents
to four incidents rectangular file structure
rectangular file structure 11,950 cases
6,171 cases 935 variables
935 variables 1,381-unit-long record
1,381-unit-long record 1 record per case
1 record per case
Part 57
Part 51 1974 person level, fourth interview
1973 person level, second interview quarter, all victims, 10 percent
quarter, all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up to four incidents
non-victims, for up to four incidents rectangular file structure
rectangular file structure 12,839 cases
6,167 cases 935 variables
935 variables 1,381-unit-long record
1,381-lJnit-long record 1 record per case
1 record per case
Victimization 191
Part 70 Part 76
1978 person level, first interview quarter, 1979 person level, third interview quarter,
all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up
to four incidents to four incidents
rectangular tile structure rectangular file structure
12,158 cases 10,469 cases
935 variables 935 variables
1,381-unit-long record 1,381-unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 71 Part 77
1978 person level, second interview 1979 person level, fourth interview
quarter, all victims, 10 percent quarter, all victims, 10 percent
non-victims, for up to four incidents non-victims, for up to four incidents
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
11,011 cases 11,799 cases
935 variables 935 variables
1,381-unlt-long record 1,381-unlt-Iong record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 72 Part 78
1978 person level, third interview quarter, 1980 person level, first interview quarter,
all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up all victims, 10 percent non-victims, for up
to four incidents to four incidents
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
10,061 cases 11,000 cases
935 variables 935 variables
1,381-unlt-long record 1,381-unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Part 73 Part 80
1978 person level, fourth interview 1980 person level, second interview
quarter, all victims, 10 percent quarter, all victims, 10 percent
non-victims, for up to four incidents non-victims, for up to four incidents
rectangular file structure rectangular file structure
10,486 cases 11,325 cases
935 variables 935 variables
1,381-unit-long record 1,381-unit-long record
1 record per case 1 record per case
Victimization 193
Part 1 Part 9
1979 full 1980 Incident
hierarchical file structure rectangular file structure
household level: 191,906 28,713 cases
person level: 351,860 473 variables
Incident level: 41,084 731-unlt-long record
1 record per case
Part 2
1980 full Part 10
hierarchical file structure 1981 incident
household level: 209,882 rectangular file structure
person level: 382,707 28,267 cases
Incld9!1t level: 43,375 473 variables
731-unlt-long record
Part 3 1 record per case
1981 full
hierarchical file structure Part 11
household level: 214,336 1982 incident
person level: 389,524 rectangular file structure
Incident level: 43,959 28,267 cases
473 variables
Part 4 731-unit-long record
1982 full 1 record per case
hierarchical file structure
household level: 216,005 Part 12
person level: 393,685 1983 incident
Incident level: 42,305 rectangular file structure
26,093 cases
Part 5 473 variables
1983 full 731-unit-long record
hierarchical file structure 1 record per case
household level: 217,814
person level: 392,058 Part 13
incident level: 39,056 1984 incidentfile
rectangular file structure
Part 6 20,980 cases
1984 full 473 variables
hierarchical file structure 731-unit-long record
household level: 201,516 1 record per case
person level: 341,790
incident level: 32,352 Part 14
1985 incident
Part 7 rectangular file structure
1985 full 19,171 cases
hierarchical file structure 473 variables
household IEIVel: 178,324 731-unit-long record
person level: 316,094 1 record per case
incident level: 28,564
Part 15
Part 8 Codebook for all datasets
1979 incident rectangular file structure
rectangular file st.-ucture 80-unit-long record
28,207 cases 1 record per case
473 variables
731-unit-long record Part 16
1 record per case 1979-1987 incident-level concatenated file
rectangular file structure
216,417 cases
473 variables
731-unlt·long record
1 record per case
Victimization 195
spondent was asked a series of screen ques- Extent of collection: 12 data files + machine-
tions to determine If ho or she was vlctlmlzOO readable documentation
during the six-month period preceding the
first day of the month of the Interview. Screen OSIRIS data format
questions ask about break-Ins or attempts
and stolen household Items, Including motor Part 9
vehicles and motor vehicle parts. The data In- 1986 collection quarter 3 file
clude type of crime, description of the of- hierarcilical file structure
fender, severity of the crime, Injuries or household level: 29,808
losses, and demographic Information on person level: 52,184
household members such as age, sex, race, Incident level: 4,489
education, employment, median family In-
come, marital status, and military history. Part 10
Class I 1986 collection quarter 4 file
hierarchical fila structure
U"Jverse: All persons In th e United States 12 household level: 29,572
years of age and older. person level: 51,762
Incident level: 4,802
Sampling: Stratified multistage cluster sample.
Part 11
Note: The National Crime Surveys data are 1987 full file
organized by collection quarter, with six quar- hierarchical file structure
ters comprising an annual file. For example, household level: 180,409
for the 1987 file the four quarters of 1987 are person level: 314,349
Included as well as the first two quarters of Incident level: 28,176
1988. The first four files described below are
hierarchically structured with four levels. The Part 12
first leVel, the household ID, has a logical re- 1988 full file
cord length of 54 characters and contains five hierarchical file structure
variables. The second level, the household, household level: 180,823
has a logical record length of 189 and 91 vari- person level: 313,196
ables. The third or person level has a logical Incident level: 28,605
record length of 124 and 50 variables (pl3r
person), and the final level, the incident level, Part 13
has a logical record length of 639 and 499 1981 incident file
variables (per Incident). The first eight parts of rectangular file structure
this collection were the original collection 18,964 cases
quarter files from the Census Bureau. These 640 variables
flies are not available for public release. The 856-unlt-long record
processed files made available for public re- 1 record per case
lease begin with Part 9. The person-level ex-
tract files are structured as annual rectangular Part 14
files, one file for each year-1987, 1988, and 1988 incident file
1989. Only incidents within the calendar y6<"J rectangular fils structure
have been Included, up to a maXimum of four 19,145 cases
Incidents per person. A 10 percent random 640 variables
sample of all peopla without incidents has 856-unIHong record
also been Included. People without Incidents 1 record per case
have also been bound by calendar year.
Each case or person contains all household, Part 15
person, and Incident variables from the full hi- Incident-level concatenated file
erarchical files or variables 2001-2091, 3001- rectangular file structure
3050, and 4001-4499. Variables 5001-5499, 56,442 cases
6001-6499, and 7001-7499 represent the sec- 640 variables
ond, third, and fourth occurrence of incidents. 856-unlt-long record
For respondents with fewer than four Inci- 1 record per case
dents, the Incident record variables contain
missing data codes. Users working with the Part 16
person- or Incident-level national crime surveys Codebook-listed-to-tapa for all parts
files should refer 10 the codebook documenting rectangular file structure
the full hierarchical file for methodological infor- 80-unit-long record
mation am appropriate code values. 1 record per case
National crime surveys: National Summary: These data are a product of the
sample of rape victims, 1973·1~IB2 National Crime Surveys Redesign Project.
The purpose of the data collection was to cre-
(ICPSR 8625) ate several different data files from existing
public-use National Crime Surveys files. For
Summary: The purpose of this stUdy was to each crime, information is gathered on the vic-
provide an In depth look at rapes and at- tim's housing unit and housl:!hold as well as
tempted rapes in the United States. The col- the incident itself. A personal history and Inter-
lection contains variables regarding the char- view are also included. Several data files con-
acteristics of the crime, such as the setting, tain National Crime Survey and Uniform
the relationship between the victim and 01- Crime Report data on the following Index
fender, the likelihood of Injury, and the reasons crimes: robbery, larceny-theft, burglary, motor
why rape is not reported to police. Class 11\ vehicle theft, rape, and aggravated assault.
Class IV
Universe; All persons In the United States.
Universe: All persons In the United States.
Sampling; A stratified mLitistade cluster sample.
Sampling: Stratiffed multistage cluster sample.
Victimization 197
Note: The victimization files were originally Part 6
part of the National crime survey: National Incident level, longitudinal file, part 2
sample (ICPSR 7635). The full longitudinal rectangular file structure
files and the longitudinal reference period re- 81,475 cases
search file each have five levels. The first 625 variables
level, the housing unit, has approximately 1,499-unlt-long record
40,000 cases. The second level, the house- 1 record per case
hold Intervie.v, has approximately 50,000
cases. The third level, the person interview Part 7
history has approximately 110,000 cases. Research referenco period file
The fourth level, the person Interview, has ap- hierarchical file structure
proximately 350,000 cases, and the fifth level,
the Incident Information, has approximately Part 8
42,000 cases. The first level of the longitudi- All index crimes file
nal full file has approximately 60 variables rectangular file structure
and a logical record length of 150. The sec- 70 cases
ond level has 350 variables and a logical re- 45 variables
cord length of 827. The third level has 100 315-unlt-long record
variables and a logical record length of 222. 1 record per case
The fourth levc~ has 44 variables and a logical
record length of 106, and the fifth level has Part 9
190 variables and a logical record length of BurglDry data file
314. The first level research reference year rectangular file structure
file has 70 variables and a logical record 70 cases
length of 160. The second level has 470 vari- 14 variables
ables and a logical record length of 900. The 60·unit-long record
third level has 115 variables and a logical re- 1 record per case
cord length of 240. The fourth level has 44
variables and a logical record length of 106, Part 10
and the fifth le·o/el has 190 variables and a logi- Change scene data file
cal record length of 314. rectangular file structure
60 cases
Extent of collection: 10 data files + machine- 15 variables
readable documentation 65-unlt-long record
1 record per case
Logical record length data format
Part 1
Longitudinal file, part 1
hierarchical file structure
Bureau of Justice Statis1ics,
U.S. Department of Justice
Part 2 National crime surveys: Reverse
Longitudinal file, part 2
hierarchical file structure record check studies: Washington,
D.C., San Jose, and Baltimore,
Part 3 1970-1971
Longitudinal file, part 3
hierarchical file structure (ICPSR 8693)
Victimization 199
OSIRIS data format Related Publication:
Archer, Dane, and Rosemary Gartner
hierarchical file structure Violence and crime in a cross-national per-
725 variables spective. New Haven, CT: Yale University
1 record per case Press, 19B4.
Archer, Dane and Rosemary Gartner Cook, Royer, Barbara Sm~h, and Adele
Harrell
Violence and crime In cross-national
perspective, 1900-1972 Helping crime victims: Levels of
(ICPSR 8612)
trauma and effectiveness of services
in Arizona, 1983·1984
Slimmary: The purpose of this data collection (ICPSR 9329)
was to provide comparative, cross-national,
longitudinal data on rates of violent and non- This study was sponsored by the United States
violent crimes for every country In the world Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
over a period of 72 years. The study was de- tice. The grant number Is 82-IJ-CX-K036.
signed to supply both comparative breadth
and historical depth. Information is Included Summary: This dAta collection was designed
on murder, rape, robbery, assault, and thefts. to gauge the Impact of a victim assistance
Class IV program on the) behavior and attitudes of vic-
tims and to 0V,'aluate the program as as-
Universe: All countries in the world. sessed by p(1l/ce and prosecutors. Program
Impuct WOi~ ~~tifl1atad by examining the
Note: The machine-readable documentation change In psycftolog)cal, social, and financial
Includes two FORTRAN command filas whloh e:ondltlol'1s of tha vletm1~ following the service
can be used in conjunction with tha data files Intervention. Three types of victim service
to output crime rates atld raw crime figures conditions were compared: crisis intervention
for each country. The only documentation pro- service, delayed assistance service, and no
vided for these files Is the comment state- service. The victim files contain information
ments Included In the files. on the victim's demographic characteristics,
various kinds of psychological indicators and
Restrictions: Users are asked to send copies stress symptoms following the incident, re-
of articles based on the data to: Dane Archer, spondent's assessments of impacts of victimi-
Stevenson College, Univ. of Calif., Santa zation on social activity, family, job, and finan-
Cruz, CA 95064 (408) 429-2555 or cial conditions. The follow-up files have
(408) 426-1186. information on the victims' financial and emo-
tional state some time after the incident. The
Extent of collection: 2 data files + machine- police files include respondent's personal
readable documentation background, types and frequency of victim-
witness services used, and opinions about
Card image data format contacts with police. The prosecutor files in-
clude variables relating to personal back-
Part 1 ground and satisfaction with the court system.
Crime file Class IV
rectangular file structure
4,568 cases Universe: Victims of the crimes of sexual as-
12 variables sault, domestic assault, other assault, robbery,
BO-unit-Iong record and burglary in Tucson, Arizona during 1983.
1 record per case
Sampling: The sample of 323 victims of sex-
Part 2 ual assault, domestic assault, other assault,
Eight crime file robbery, and burglary consists of two major
rectangUlar file structure groups. For the first group 223 victims were
3,520 cases selected from victim assistance program re-
11 variables cords (109 had received immediate crisis in-
BO-unit-Iong record tervention services and 114 had received de-
1 record per case layed services from the program). A matched
Victimization 201
agalnst future victimization. The follow-up as- age, housebreaking, violence, robberies, as-
sessment battery was virtually Identical to the saults, and attempts. Victim-offender relation-
Initial battery, except that questions about ships, crime prevention techniques, and po-
services and social support received by the lice contact variables are also provided.
victim were added. The following demo- Household demographic variables Include
graphic variables are Included In the data: employment, education, Income, Insurance,
sex, age, marital status, education, Income, and city size. Class IV
and race. The unit of analysis was the individ-
ual. Class IV Extent of collection: 4 data files + machlne-
readable documentation + SPSS Control
Universe: Victims of crime In New York City Cards
during 1984 and 1985.
logical record length data format
Extent of collection: 2 data files + SPSS Con-
trol Cards Part 1
1988 data, sample 2,000
logical record length data format with SPSS rectangular file structure
control cards 2,000 cases
247 variables
Part 1 328-unit-long record
Wave I interview data 1 record per case
rectangular file structure
272 cases Part 2
136 variables Data list 1988, sample 2,000
303-unlt-long record 80-unit-long record
1 record per case
Part 3
Part 2 Variable list 1988, sample 2,000
Wave II interview data 132-unit-long record
rectangular file structure
196 cases Part 4
110 variables 1988 data, sample 28,006
259-unit-long record rectangular file structure
1 record per case 28,006 cases
280 variables
Related Publication: 372-unit-long record
Davis, Robert C. 1 record per case
·Providing help to victims: A study of psy-
chological and material outcomes: Execu- Part 5
tive summary." New York, NY: Victim Serv- Data list 1988, sample 28,006
Ices Agency, 1987. 80-unit-long record
Part 6
Variable list 1988, sample 28,006
Dutch Ministry of Justice 132-unit-long record
Victimization 203
Gibbs, John J. and Peggy L Shelly These data were collected from the files of
the Xenon, New Jersey, Police Department.
SLATS truck theft data of New York
City, 1976-1980 The collection consists of one data file con-
taining 218 incidents and 37 variables. A
(lCPSR 8090) printed codebook documents these data
which are available In card-Image format with
This study was sponsored by the United States one deck per Incident. Class IV
Depcvtment of Justice, National Institute of Jus-
tice. The grCW'lt number Is 8O-IJ-CX-OOOO.
Gibbs, John J. and Peggy L Shelly Sampling: Combination of sample from police
record system and random digit dialed sample.
Xenon (New Jersey) commercial
burglary data, 1979-1981 Note: For reasons of confidentiality the
ICPSR has masked several variables.
(ICPSR 8088)
Extent of collection: 6 data files
This study was sponsored by the United States
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- Logical record length data format
tice. The grant number is 8O-IJ-CX-OOOO.
Part 1
Summary: One of three quantitative data Record check 1, person-level data
bases comprising the Commercial Theft Stud- rectangular file structure
ies component of the Study of the Causes of 2,077 cases
Crime for Gain, this criminal justice data col- approximately 2,322 variables
lection contains information on commercial 3,447-unit-long record
burglary incidents in a specific geographic 1 record per case
area. The data collection includes Incident
characteristics, theft item, value of stolen
property and suspect characteristics, e.g., po-
lice contacts, number of arrests, sex, race,
and age.
Part 1
Victim file
Hernon, Jolene C. and Brian Forst rectangular file structure
392 cases
Criminal justice response to victim 67 variables
harm In the United States, 1981 268-unlt-long record
1 record per case
(ICPSR 8249)
Part 2
This study was sponsored by the United States Police file
Department of Justice, National Institute of Jus- rectangular file structure
tice. The grant number is 82-IJ-CX-0009. 111 cases
66 variables
Summary: This data collection examines the 317-unit-long record
effects of victim harm on decisions regarding 1 record per case
arrest, prosecution, and sentencing and the
effect of these decisions on the victim's per-
ception of the criminal justice system. Five
types of offenses were studied; homicide, sex-
ual assault, burglary, robbery, and aggravated
assault. The victim file contains information
on personal characteristics, results of victimi-
Victimization 205
Part 3 Sampling: Multistage probability sample using
Prosecutor file electoral registers as the frame.
rectangular file structure
101 cases Note: This collection offers three distinct rep-
73 variables resentations of British Crime Survey data
380-unlt-long record They are Parts 1-3, Part 4, and Part 5. Part 1
1 record per case consists of data captured on the Main Ques-
tionnaire. Pan 2 represents data from the Vic-
Part 4 tim Form. Part 3 consists of data collected via
Judge file the Follow up Questionnaire. Parts 1-3 are
rectangular file structure documented with SPSS Control Cards and
48 cases the nonnumeric codes "-1" and "-2" are used
52 variables to represent missing data Part 4 Is a hierar-
278-unit-long record chically structured file consisting of 5 cards
1 record per case per respondent containing data from the Main
Questionnaire (approximately 188 variables),
Related Publication: followed by 5 cards per Victim Form (approxi-
Hernon, Jolene C., and Brian Forst mately 290 variables) for up to four Victim
"The criminal Justice response to victim Forms per respondent, followed by 5 carcls
harm." Washington, DC: National Institute containing data from the Follow up Question-
of Justice, 1984. naire (approximately 230 variables). Only re-
spondents reporting incidents of victimization
have Victim Forms. The Follow-up Question-
naire was administered to all respondents re-
porting Incidents of victimization arId to two in
Home Office Research and Planning Un~ five other respondents. Part 5 is identical to
British crime sUlVay, 1982 Part 4 except that it has been "padded" by in-
serting blank cards so that there are thirty 80-
(lCPSR 8672) column cards for each respondent. The code-
book describes Parts 4 and 5 only. Hardcopy
Summary: The primary purpose of the British documentation describes interviews with
Crlma Survey was to estimate how many of 5,031 people in Scotland, however, data for
the public In England and Wales are victims Scotland are not included In this dataset.
of selected types of crime over a year, de-
scribing the circumstances under which peo-
ple become victims, and the consequences of
crime for victims. Other aims included provid-
Ing background Information on fear of crime Home Office Research and Planning Untt
among the public and on public contact with British crime surveys, 1984
the police. Respondents were asked a series
of screening questions to establish whether (ICPSR 8685)
or not they or their households had been vic-
tims of relevant crimes during the one-year Summary: In 1982 the Home Office con-
reference period. They were then asked a se- ducted the first British Crime Survey, a major
ries of very detailed questions about the Inci- study with the aim of discovering levels of vic-
dents they reported. Basic descriptive back- timization in Britain, and of producing attitudi-
ground Information on respondents and their nal data on issues relating to crime. The sur-
households was collected to allow analysis of vey was repeated in 1984 and was restricted
the sorts of people who do and do not be- to England and Wales whereas the previous
come victims. Information was also collected study had included Scotland. The survey set
on other areas which were of Intrinsic interest out to replicate the previous one as far as pos-
and which could usefully be related to experi- sible. Other than questions having to do with
ence as a victim, namely, fear of crime, con- victimization and basic demographic details,
tact with the police, lifestyle, and self-reported the topics covered in the questionnaire were:
offending. Class IV general opinion of the local area, fear of crime
and precautions taken, likelihood of crime oc-
Universe: People aged 16 and over living in curring, extent of "incivliities" in the area, seri-
private households in England and Wales ousness of various crimes, attitudes towards
and whose addresses appear In the electoral punishment and prison reform, victim support
registers. schemes, neighborhood watch schemes, and
self-reported offending. Class IV
Victimization 207
Part 2 Ity of life In the District. Also studied was the
Post-intervention surveys in residential degree to which Congressional employees
neighborhoods working In the Capitol Hill area were subject
rectangular file structure to victimization and the extent to which victimi-
3,079 cases zation and the fear caused by it affected their
343 variables productivity.
SO-unlt-Iong record
5 records per case This data collection contalns six files, three of
which are data files. The first file contalns per-
Part 3 son-level data such as residential mobility,
Pre-Intervention surveys of crime provention efforts, and soclodemo-
non-residential establishments graphic characteristics. This file includes
rectangular file structure 5,542 cases with one record per respondent
293 cases and has a logical record length of 334. The
205 variables crime data file, called the "In Scope Crimes
sO-un it-long record File,· contains 1,950 records. Each record in
5 records per case this file represents a reported criminal victimi-
zation, and the file's logical record length Is
Part 4 531. The third file, the "Out of Scope File,·
Post-intervention surveys of has 2,525 cases. An out of scope crime was
non-residential establishments defined as one which was either outside the
rectangular file structure analysis time period of May 1, 19S2 to April
299 cases 30, 1983 or not a crime of interest for this
195 variables study. The logical record length of this file Is
BO-unit-Iong record 150. The three remaining files In this collec-
5 records per case tion are machine-readable codebook files
with logical recl')rd lengths of 133 characters.
PartS Class IV
Follow-up study of victims from Hous~on,
Texas
rectangular file structure
485 cases
224 variables Schreiber, Jan E.
BO-unit-Iong record Inmate victimization in state prisons in
6 records per case the United States, 1979
Part 6 (lCPSR S087)
Questionnaire newsletter
rectangular file structure This data collection was designed to deter-
B19 cases mine the nature and extent of victimization in
633 variables state prisons across the nation. In particular, it
BO-unlt-Iong record examines such quantitative areas as prison
11 records per case living conditions, prison programs, prison
safety, and Inmates' victimization of (or by)
other inmates in several types of property and
bodily crimes. In addition, it contalns a set of
Research Triangle Instttute attitudinal measures dealing with Inmates'
thoughts and perceptions on a variety of sub-
CrimInal victImIzation of DIstrict of jects including their reactions to general state-
Columbia residents and Capitol Hili ments about prison life and to a series of hy-
employees, 1982-1983 pothetical and potentially provocative
situations.
(ICPSR B22B)
Data are aVallable in both OSIRIS and card-
This victimization study of District of Columbia image formats, with machine-readable docu-
residents and Capitol Hill employees was con- mentation. The data file contalns 339 vari-
ducted between May 1982 and April 1983. ables for each of the 487 cases and has a
The data collection was sponsored by the logical record length of 545 characters.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Class II
Statistics (BJS). The primary objective was to
measure the extent of crime In the District of
Columbia and the Impact of crime on the qual-
Summary: This data collection examines the Straus, Murray A. and Richard J. Gelles
needs of burglary, rObbery, and assault vic-
tims and the responses of local victim assis- Physical violence In Amorlcan
tance programs to those needs in four metro- families, 1~76
politan areas: Evanston, Ullnols, Rochester,
New York, Pima County, Arizona, and Fayette (ICPSR 7733)
County, Kentucky. Four issues were explored
in detail: the needs of victims, where they This study was conducted In 1976 at the Uni-
seek help, the kinds of help they receive, and versity of New Hampshire with funding pro-
which of their problems do and do not get reo vided by a grant from NIMH. :2,143 respon-
solved. Variables Include (1) demographic In- dents were Interviewed In a nationwide
formation such as clty of residence, length of sample - 960 males and 1,183 females. In-
ret:ldence, birth date, marital status, race, terviews were conducted by Hesponse Analy-
work status, education, and income, (2) infor- sis, Inc. The purpose of the study was to as-
mation on the crime itself, such as type of certaln methods of contllct resolution within
crime, when the crime happened, and details the family. Information was gathered regard-
of the attack and attacker, and (3) conse- ing the following areas: resolution of conflicts
quences of the crime, such as problems en- between spouees and between parents and
countered as a result of the crime, emotional children, InclUding detailed Information on the
responses to the crime, and reactions to the development of conflicts resulting In violence;
crime on a practical level. Class IV resolution of conflicts In respondent's child-
hood family; family power structure; marital
Universe: All burgla'Y, robbery, and assault closeness and stability; and personality and
victims In Evanston, illinoiS, Rochester, New stress factors. The file consists of approxi-
York, Pima County, Arizona, and Fayette mately 481 varlables and 450 derived meas-
County, Kentucky. ures for each respondent. Class II
Sampling: Proportional stratified sample
based on type of victims-fobbery, assaUlt,
and burgiat)'.
Victimization 209
Index of principal investigators
Index 211
Fleming, Roy B. •••••.••••••• 86 J
Forst, Brian • • • • • • • • • • • 77, 117, 205
FowlEr, Floyd J. • •••••••••••• 17 Jacob, Herbert ••••••••••••• 141
Fox, James Alan ••••••• 157,159,162 Jesness, Carl F. • • • • • • • • • • • • • 131
FrE¥. David • • • • • • • • • • 19 Johnston, Uoyd D. • •••••••••• 121
Furstenberg, Frank, Jr. • • • • • • • • • 139
K
G
Kahn, Robert L . . . . . . . . . . 4
Gartner, Rosemary • • • • • • . • • • • 200 Kansas City, Missouri, Police
Gelles, Richard J. •••••••.• 203, 209 Department • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 171
Gibbs, John J. •••••••• ••• 203, 204 Katz, Jack • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 131
Gilliland, Michael • • • • . . • • • • • • 178 Kerstetter, Wayne A. • •••••••••• 82
Gold, Martin •••••••••••• 130,131 Klecka, Wesley •••••••••••••• 3
Goldkamp, John S. • • • • • • , • • • • • 80 Klein, Malcolm W. • • • • • • • • • • • • 171
Goodstein, Lynne •••••••••••• 44 Knight, Rayrnond .............53
Gorden, Margaret A. •••. • • • • • • 171 Kobrin, Solorno., •••••••••••• .18
Gottfredson, Michael R. ••••••••• 80 Kramer, John H•..•••••••••.•• 44
Gould, LeRoy ••••.•••••••. .115 Krepps·Hess, Barbara J. . •••••••• 46
Greenberg, David F. •••••.•••• 158 Krlsberg, Barry •.••••••••• .40,41
Greenberg, Stephanie .••••••••• 18 Kritzer, Herbert M. • • • • • • • • • • • • .82
Grofman, Bernard • • • • • • • 99
Grossman, Joel B. • • • • • • • • 82
Groves, Robert M. . . . . . . . . . , . 204 L
Gurr, Erika . • • . • • • , . • • • • • • 158
Gurr, Ted Robert • • • . • • • • • • • . 158 lattimore, Pamela K. ...........47
Laumann, Edward O. ••••. . • • . • 100
Lavrakas, Paul J. •••••••••. 11, 142
H Uzotte, Alan J. . • • • • • • • • . . • • • 159
Loeber, Rolf ••••.•••••.•••• 132
Haapenan, Rudy • • • • • . • • • • • . 131 Loftln, Colin •••.•••••• • • • ,19, 83
Hakim, Simon . . . , . . . . . . . . . .118 Los Angeles District Attorney's Office ••• 48
Hammett, Theodore M. . • • • . • • • • 100 Lurlglo, Arthur J. • . • • • • • • • • 142, 209
Harper, Dean .•••.•.••••••.• 44
Harrell, Adele . • • • • • • • • • • • . . 200
Hartigan, Richard .•••.••••. •• 45 M
Heck, Joseph • • • • • . 162
Heinz, John P. .•.••.•.••••• 100 MacKenzie, Doris L. •••••••••••• 44
Hellman, Daryl A. • . . • • • . . • • • • 159 Mahoney, Barry •••••.•••.•••• 97
Henderson, Joel ••••.•.••.• •• 22 Mande, Mary J. ••••.•••••••. .50
Hepburn, John R. , . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Manpower Demonstration Research
Hernon, Jolene C. .••.•.•..•• 205 Corporation • • • • • • • • . . • • • • .50
Heumann, Milton • . • • . . . . • • • • • 83 Marans, Robert W. ............23
Hewitt, John ••••••••••..•. 159 Marsden, Mary Ellen ••.•••••••• 51
Hindus, Michael S. • • . • • . • • • .80, 100 Martin, Susan . • • • • • • • • • • • • • 172
Hirsch, Jon ••.•..•.•. , • , •. 169 Marvell, Thomas ••••.••••••• 101
Hirsch, Ronald L . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Matulia, Kenneth J. •••.••••••• 173
Hobson, Barbara M. ••••••••.• 100 Maxson, Cheryl L . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
Holeman, Herbert ••••••••..•. 46 Maynard·Moody, Steven ••••••••. 52
Home Office Research and Planning McCampbell, Michael S. • ••••••• 173
Unit •••.••.•••.••.••• 206 McCarthy, Jack •••.••.••••••• 49
Huizinga, David •••••.•.•.•• 169 McDevitt, Jack ••••••••.•••. 169
McDonald, William F. . •••••.• 84,118
McPherson, Marlys •••.•••••••• 19
Mendelsohn, Harold • • • • • . • • • • • • 11
Messinger, Sheldon •••••••••••• 51
The illinois Criminal Justice Information Mlethe, Terance •••••••.•••.•• 84
Authority • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • 148 Mihajlovlc, Steve . . , . . . . . . . . . 178
Innes, Christopher A. . . • . • • • • . • 207 Milder, N. David • • • . . . . . . • . . • . 20
Institute for Law and Social Research, Inc. 81 Milkman, Raymond H.•• , •••••••• 20
Miller, Frederick .••.•..••••••• 94
Index 213
little, Charles R. • ••••.••.•.•. 13 Whitaker, Gordon P. . . • . . • . . . . . 175
Toborg, Mary A. ••.••.••..••• 89 Whitehouse, Wayne G. . . . • . . . • • 174
Toeh, Hans • . • . . . . . . • . . . . . 137 Wice, Paul .•...• . .86
Tracy, Paul E. • . . . • . • . . • . 129,165 Widom, Cathy Spatz . . . . . . . • • . 137
Triplett, Ruth ...• • • . . 183 Williams, Jay R. . . • . • . . . . . . . . 131
Trubek, David M. . • . • . . . . . . . • • 82 Wilson, James Q. ••• • • • • • • • • • 177
Wise, lois Recascino . • . . . . • . . . 119
Witte, Ann D. • . . . . . • . . . . . . . . 56
U Wolfgang, Marvin E. • . • . . . 129,138,165
Woodworth, George . • . . . . . • . .70, 71 .".
Uchida, Craig D. . . . • . • . . . . • . 184 Wright, James . • . • • . . . • . • . . . .58
United States Sentencing Commission 107 Wright, Kevin. . . . . . . . . . .58
v y
Van Duizend, Richard . . . . . . . . • 185 Yankelovlch, Skeltj, and White, Inc. • 108
Vandaele, Waiter . • • . . . . . . . . . 164 Yeager, Peter C. . . . . • . • • . 143
Vera Institute of Justice, New York City 108
W
z
Zahn, Margaret A. . . . . . . 163, 165
WABC·TV . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 13 Zedlewski, Edwin W. • • • • . . . . . . 120
Washington Post . • . • . . . . . . . 2,3,15 Zeuhl, James ••..•.. • . . . . 166
WCBS·TV News • . . . . . . . . • . . . 14 Zill, Nicholas . 139
Weisburd, David ., . . • . . • . . . . 144 Zimring, Franklin E. • . . . . . . . . . • 166
Welch, Susan • . . • . . . • . • . . 90
Wheeler, Stanton • . . • . . . . • . . . 144