The
of the Spec
Volume I Autumn 1994
NEW WORLD ORDER
COMBAT
. ARMS SURVEY
Question #46
''I Would Fire Upon U.S. Citizens.~.''
e RESISTER has confim1ed that US Navy SEAL
Ti
latoons, including SEAL Team Six, Marine
combat veterans stationed at Twenty-Nine Palms,
CA, and Marine basic trainees at Camp Pendelton, CA,
have been administered a questionnaire asking, among
other things, if they would " ... fire upon US citizens who
refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the
U.S. government."
The questionnaire was first administered to operators
by the commanders of SEAL Team Six on 15 September
1993, then subsequently to the remaining SEAL platoons
throughout September and October. Rumors began
circulating in November that US Amly DELTA operators
were given the same or a similar questionnaire. The SF
Underground had been aware of the questionnaire since
late September but our observers had been unable to
secure a copy or confirm other than its substance con-
sisted of questions pertaining to the subordination of the
Boxholder, P.O. Box 1403, Addison, Texas, 75001
Nun1ber 2
US military to the UN and confiscation of the firearms of
US citizens. In early January, 1994, we obtained a copy of
the questionnaire from one of our DOD sympathizers but
lacking corroboration we ran the story in Vol.I, No.1 of
The RESISTER as a rumor.
On January 22, 1994, one of our observers copied a
chilling message off the Internet from Petty Officer 2nd
Class W. Kelly, US Navy Special Warfare Team Six, to D.
Hankins, Re: Gun Confiscation. Kelly began by stating
that the questionnaire was " .. .to find out if we would
follow the orders of commanding officers without ques-
tion." (Kelly omitted the fact that the questionnaire
assumes "commanding officers" gives equal authority to
UN officers commanding US forces.) Kelly continued; "If
you wish to find out how I answered I said yes I would
fire and kill all persons attempting to resist...we aren't
around to be the good guys." Remember, Kelly is referring
Continued on page 9
Gratis
 The RESISTER

EDITORIAL AN OPEN
LETTER TO OUR
READERS
The Lie of Equal Opportunity oR THE past two months our

Opportunity Program of the United States Army claims that it

F observers have been reporting
that some readers are question-

TI
EQUAL ing the integrity of contributors to
emulates, directs, and sustains a comprehensive effort to ensure fair The RESISTER because they choose
treatment of all soldiers "based solely on merit, fitness, capability, and to be known by pseudonyms rather
potential, which supports readiness." This policy is stated to be based on than their real names. This is a
"fairness, justice, and equity." But the simple fact is that if the Equal Opportu- legitimate concern and it deserves to
nity Program were based solely on merit, fitness, capability, and potential there be answered at length.
would be no need for it. The EO policy officially sanctions, by its very exist- First, no contributor is obliged to
ence, unfairness, injustice, and inequality. use a pseudonym, as anybody who
The philosophical premise of all equal opportunity programs is egalitarian- has actually read the first issue can
ism. Egalitarianism is the belief that all men are equal. If "equality" is held to tell you. Second, the decision to
any serious or rational standard, as in the realm of politics and law, egalitarian- require staff members and regular
ism is the principle of individual rights which cannot be repealed by democratic contributors to use pseudonyms was
majority, subverted by minority machinations, nor infringed by government an OPSEC issue, not an ethical one.
legislation. Third, there is a historical prece-
But political and legal equality are not the intent of equal opportunity dence we follow which, if not
programs. Equal opportunity programs seek nothing less than metaphysical already familiar to you, in all ·
equality; the equality of ability, competence, industriousness, and intelligence. likelihood never will be, and is
Equal opportunity programs, by their very existence, defy the objective reality therefore none of your business.
that all men are not equal. They seek to abolish some perceived "unfairness" Fourth, publishing The RESISTER
that does not permit the inept, incompetent, lazy, or stupid to succeed. is a security risk in it's own right, let
Note how the goal of equality is achieved. alone referring to it's tradecraft and
Since equal recognition for unequal performance would be too obvious an organization. Really; what do they
injustice, equal opportunity egalitarians prohibit unequal performance. (Read teach you guys in the Q-Course
any OER or NCOER.) these days?
Because some men are able to accept responsibility faster than others, the The RESISTER is a response to
egalitarians deny the notion of"merit" and substitute the concept of"seniority" the altruistic cannibalism which is
for promotions. (Study the results of any promotion board.) consuming the principle of inalien-
Since some men are more intelligent than others, the egalitarians forbid able individual rights upon which
individual excellence and subordinate it to the collective mediocrity of "consen- this nation was founded and which
sus building" and stultifying institutional group-think. (Observe the workings have been served-up in sacrifice to
of any committee or "team.") the mob god of democracy, the
Since some men have greater ability and study more conscientiously than minority god of tribalism, the nature
others, the egalitarians abolish objective standards based on achievement and god of environmentalism, the slave
substitute subjective outcome-based 'standards' that equate the lame to the fit god of collectivism, and the statist
and the moron to the intelligent. (Attend any school.) god of socialism.
Equality of opportunity has nothing to do with equality or opportunity. It is Do you want to know who we
the official doctrine of racism, tribalism, and collectivism. It is but one premise are? We are the individuals who
of the unconscionable evil of altruism. Equal opportunity is the official sanction conceive the ideas the cretinous mob
of the hatred of the good because it is good. calls "the team effort." We are the
If the Army's Equal Opportunity Program were truly based on individual individuals whose excellence is
"merit, fitness, capability, and potential," personnel records would be purged of subverted by the racist policy of
all references to race and ethnic origin, the Official Photo would be eliminated, "equal opportunity." We are the
and commanders would again have local promotion authority above Staff independent, innovative, and
Sergeant. creative who have been enslaved to
Richard Crossman
• serve the "greater good." Without us
Continued on page 4

2 Vol. I, No.2

CORRESPONDENCE
Is The RESISTER
For Real?
I write this letter the
arious comments I have
eard concerning The
RESISTER return to mind. The first
one is, "Are you for real?" The
converse being that your publication
is a U.S. Government plant to entrap
members of the SOF community into
revealing themselves. Secondly, why
not print the names of contributors?
To me that is obvious, but I'll let you
explain.
Thought I would let you know I
got a big kick out of the "Personals."
Reminds me of WWII and the
French Resistance stories I have
heard and read. Also, the commo
block was a nice touch.
If you are an actual paper I hope
you have the space to print this
letter. It will at least show some of
the doubting here at the Special
Warfare Center and School that
there is someone out there.
Please feel free to use my name
and office as I see no need to use a
nom de guerre.
SFC David R. Hall
USAJFKSWCS
Yes. See RUMORS. We will: See
Vol.!, No.1, p.6, col. 3, para. 3,
ln.l6.
It is impolite to discuss
tradecraft. Read--Secret Forces:
The Technique of Underground
A1ovements, by FO. Miksche.
We assume you mean "nom de
plume."
The Editor
Vol. I, No.2
The RESISTER
CONSERVATIVE
REVIEW
have received a xerox copy of The
I RESISTER, Vol. I, No. 1.
I like it! Can I be on your mailing
list?
Dr. Susan Huck
Associate Editor
Conservative Review
1307 Dolly Madison Blvd.
McLean, VA 22101
(703) 893-7302
For obvious (to us) reasons we do
not keep mailing lists. We will,
~ however, see to it that you are
included in the distribution scheme
and receive a grey copy.
We do ask that ifyou intend to
mention The RESISTER in your
publication you have the profes-
sional courtesy to let us review said
material first. Mail reaches us
through a rather indirect and
laborious route, so give us at least
four weeks to respond.
The Editor
NEW WORLD
SLAVERY
s anyone considered that if
H
he United Nations possessed
ufficient power to enforce
world peace they would also have
the power to enforce world dictator-
ship? Apparently this fact does not
trouble our government.
Since 1961 the United States
Department of State has been
negotiating away our national
sovereignty in the name of "World
Peace" consistent with the provi-
sions of the Kennedy administration
document entitled "FREEDOM
FROM WAR." I am no major league
historian but I am old enough to
remember that "peace" was the
communist catch phrase meaning
one-world communism.
Does anyone else stop to consider
that the United States is the orily
non-socialist country in the world
and United Nations edicts on arms
control, environmentalism, and
'human rights' are always focused
on, and contrary to, the interests of
tl1e United States?
"FREEDOM FROM WAR"
outlined a three-stage evolution
designed to make the UN the sole
legitimate user of force on the face
of the planet. Keep in mind that this
was the US Department of State's
vision for the future of this country
in 1961.
Phase One essentially eliminates
the notion of national sovereignty by
enforcing unilateral disarmament
while strengthening UN "peace-
keeping" powers.
Phase two reinforces UN "peace-
keeping" by transferring all legiti-
macy for the exercise of military
force to the United Nations. We are
already there. Note that regardless of
the sovereign interests of this .
country during DESERT SHIELD
president Bush went groveling to the
United Nations for permission to act.
Phase three will permit nations to
retain only those forces and arma-
Contmued on page 4
3

CORRESPONDENCE
Slavery
Continued from page 3
ments necessary for the maintenance
of internal order. Only the UN will
maintain arms and forces necessary
to wage offensive war under the
control ofit's "Peace Force."
Now, the US has endorsed a
working paper seeking global gun
control submitted to the UN Disar-
mament Commission by Patti
Londono, a Colombian UN diplo-
mat. On May 9, 1994, the United
States allowed consensus adoption of
the working paper which puts
domestic gun control on par with
nuclear disarmament.
George Prescott
USAJFKSWCS
The Danger of
Precedence
ope you have been following
E
e O.J. Simpson case at least
ough the preliminary hearing.
The key issue was Fourth Amend-
ment rights. For the sake of clarity
the Fourth Amendment states:
The right of the people to be secure in
their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
against umeasonable searches and seizures,
shall not be violated, and no warrants shall
issue but upon probable cause, supported
by oath or alf"umation, and particularly
describing the place to be searched, and the
persons or things to be seized.
Now that we're on the same sheet
of music, some of the arguments
made by O.J. 's council make better
sense. The Fourth Amendment says
in essence that, if you want to search
a residence, you need a warrant.
Quite plain and simple. It says
4 Vol. I, No.2
The RESISTER
nothing about exigent (urgent or
critical) circumstances nor does it
infer them.
The argument of exigent circum-
stances has developed from "legal
precedence." An analogy for
precedence is as follows : Your
mother tells you to stay out of the
cookie jar or she will beat your butt.
You get into it and get caught. Mom
is in a good mood and doesn't beat
you. The next time she catches you
she's angry but you plead precedence
to prevent your beating. You got
away with it the first time so why
not this time?
It is the same with the legal
system. When the police violate the
Constitution, and get away with it,
new case law follows and precedent
for the action is established.
What about exigent circum-
stance? It has become a standard
police tactic to subvert the intent of
the Fourth Amendment prohibitions
against unwarranted search and
~ unreasonable seizure.
I am not here to say the police
should not enter a place if a true
crisis is taking place. However, the
limit of their action though should
be to stop the disturbance, secure the
scene and request a warrant if
probable cause exists. But a tiny
blood spot on a vehicle door should
not be brought before the court as
the basis for the police or district
attorney's claim of"exigent circum-
stance."
Neither this, nor the claim of
someone else in danger, holds any
credence. The police did not race to
the home of Nicole's "friend" and
crash in to see if everyone was safe.
What about equal treatment under
the law?
O.J. Simpson's Fourth Amend-
ment rights were clearly violated.
You may not care for Simpson or
you may even say, "he is guilty so
who cares how he was brought
down." That attitude is precisely the
Open Letter
. Continued from page 2
you would still be prying roots out of
the ground with a pointed stick.
It would be a great comfort and
convenience for the myriad uncon-
stitutional federal agencies to note
us, categorize us, and file us away
for future "reference." We will not
give them an early chance, nor will
we be goaded into identifying
ourselves by sneering comments
about anonymous writers.
Every whim based, undefined,
un-judicable law it passes; every
unconstitutional gang of armed,
badge wielding thugs it deploys;
every unconstitutional agency it
creates; every incomprehensible
special interest regulation it man-
dates; every dime extorted through
taxation and redistributed to the
incompetent and undeserving; every
American life lost in some altruistic
war, humanitarian assistance, or
peacekeeping operation, demon-
strates the illegitimacy of the federal
government.
The federal government is not "of
the people," it is the instrument of
pull-peddlers. It is not "by the
people," it is the toady of special
interests. It is not "for the people," it
is the exercise offorce for the sake
of force.
Pass laws against us; we will not
obey. Regulate our activities; we will
not comply. Legislate our behavior;
we will not consent.
We are freemen. We will not be
subjugated. We have the guns to
prove it.
The Editor
problem. It is better for a guilty
man to go free than have our rights
trampled upon by the minions of so-
called justice. If any government is
allowed to use whatever measures it
deems necessary to bring order, you
can rest assure that it will be
totalitarian and brutal.
"Lexington"
USAJFKSWCS

HORROR FILE
Crime Bill Defines
The RESISTER as
Instrument of
Terror
-;
s ONAlOR 'OSEPH BIDRN's SB 226,
now incorporated into the
Crime Control Act of 1993,
(passed by both houses of Congress
and soon to be signed by Clinton),
would make publication of The
RESISTER an "intent" to commit a
terrorist act.
Section 8 ofBiden's SB226
'defines' intent in this context as
"appear to be intended (1) to
intimidate or coerce a civilian
population; (2) to influence the
policy of a government by intimida-
tion or coercion."
This includes, but is not limited
to; demonstrations, pickets, com-
puter bulletin boards, publications,
assemblies, and speech.
First Amendment
Trial Balloon
H~RRY w. MARRERO (JD) is
being "detained" in a
1aximum security federal
prison, without bond, for producing
and selling a video tape about the
Constitution entitled "Sovereignty
vs. Slavery."
Mr. Marrero was indicted by a
federal Grand Jury on charges of
conspiracy, wire fraud, and mail
fraud because he poses a "danger to
society" for spreading "propa-
Vol. I, No . 2
The RESISTER
ganda." Mr. Merrero's message?
The primacy of the individual.
The federal crime bill designates
anti-government speech, such as
proclaiming the desirability of
revolution against tyranny, as
"material support to terrorism," and
makes RICO forfeiture possible for
statements made up to 4 years prior
to the enactment of the bill.
This is ex post facto legislation.
Equal Opportunity
Poverty
T: DECENT middle class
ighborhood you live in has
ow been designated by the
federal governn1ent as a "low
poverty area." This means your
neighborhood is unfairly divided
from inner city slums by a lack of
"income integration."
HUD now considers almost every
neighborhood in America as an
unfair housing market, liable to
forced integration by the whim of
the federal government. If you own
property in a middle-class neighbor-
hood you are now guilty, by default,
of the undefined charge of racism.
Between 1970 and 1976 HUD
transformed Detroit and Chicago
into giant sprawling slums by
redistributing welfare moochers and
their criminal, gang, and drug
addict hitchhikers to affluent
neighborhoods. HUD secretary
Henry Cisneros and HUD assistant
secretary for fair housing Roberta
Achtenberg figure that was not good
enough.
Altruist egalitarianism demands
that everyone live in equally crime-
ridden slums.
"This Isn't
Something You
Need to Have in
Your Library"
M o R MARK PRUGH, acting
n the instructions of
olonel Richard Seim,
Command Judge Advocate, United
States Army John F. Kennedy
Special Warfare Center and School,
confiscated the USAJFK Special
Warfare Center and School Marquat
Memorial Library's well thumbed
reference copy of The RESISTER.
(For the edification of' our civilian
readers the Command Judge
Advocate, COL Seim, works
exclusively for, and acts solely on
the behalf of, Major General
William Garrison, Commander,
USAJFKSWCS.) What is particu-
larly obnoxious is that it was a grey
copy; in other words, an original.
Tltis outrage occurred Thursday, 25
August, 1994.
Our observers report that MAJ
Prugh asked for the desk copy of
The RESISTER and, having
obtained it from the unwitting duty
librarian, turned to walk out the
door with it. When advised that the
issue in question was the library's
only reference copy and was not to
be removed from the premises Prugh
returned to the desk and scrawled a
note stating who he was and that he
was acting "per COL Seim's
instructions," while stapling his card
to the note.
When asked why he was taking
the library's only copy he replied,
"This isn't something you need to
have in your library."
Continued on page 15 .
5

The RESISTER a
Government Plot?
M
OR ROBERT TIFFANY, FA,
octrine Division,
SAJFKSWCS, has
opined that The RESISTER is
published by the Clinton administra-
tion as a vehicle designed to "smoke
out" dissidents and subversiveness
in the military.
Nice try Bob. Now that you 're
retiring we hope you don t have to
make a living by your analytical
skills.
The Staff
U.N. Fomenting
Insurgencies
N INTERESTING tidbit SUrfaced
n The New Federalist, dated
une 13, 1994. It seems the
United Nations Human Development
Program has been 'studying' the
internal conditions of various Third
World countries.
In the case of Mexico, the
UNHDP conducted an exhaustive
study of "human conditions" in State
of Chiapas during the spring of
1993. Seven months later, in
January 1994, Mexico was faced
with an insurgency in that state, led
by the masked (and alleged homo-
sexual) pipe smoking Marcos.
We have reproduced an article
leveling the charge of UN sponsored
insurgencies by a Mexican journal-
ist, Linda de Hoyos, on page 12.
Normally, we care less what happens
in Mexico. But because American
6 Vol. I, No.2
The RESISTER
RUMORS
soldiers are now routinely deployed
to dung heaps by our socialist
government to "help" miserable,
starving, Third World abstractions at
the behest of the United Nations, we
thought you should see what you're
getting into, and why.
Associate Editor
Primer Shortage
F
oR the past eight months it has
been almost impossible to buy
primers in any reasonable
quantity. The RESISTER began
quietly canvassing manufacturers,
wholesalers, and retailers to find out
why.
Retailers and wholesalers were
patiently waiting for cartridge
manufacturers to finish their annual
~ production which they (the distribu-
tors), said usually reduced primer
availability until early summer.
When we talked to the manufactur-
ers they said the U.S. government
had placed orders for ammunition
six times their normal annual
commission. Some quick fourth-
grade math completed the story.
In a normal year, the federal
government purchases approxi-
mately 1. 7 million rounds for its
myriad unconstitutional law enforce-
ment agencies. This excludes the
various arsenals which produce
ammunition for the military. This
year the federal government pur-
chased over one billion rounds.
It gets uglier. This year the
federal government began arming
the IRS and the EPA. The Fed's are
also expanding the FBI's HRT, the
BATF's enforcement branch, and
DOE's private army. Juxtapose this
with the federal government's
determination to abrogate the
Second Amendment.
If anyone has information
pertaining to this issue write us.
The Editor
National Forest
HLZ's
w.
HEN UNITs are deployed on
JTF-Six missions they are
routinely required to
locate and survey Helicopter
Landing Zones within National
Forests which are then turned over
to the National Forest Service during
the post mission AAR. The official
explanation is that these HLZ's will
be used by future missions as
MEDEVAC dust-off sites.
Debriefs of personnel returning
from JTF-Six missions indicate that
the purpose of the National Forest
HLZ surveys is not quite so benign.
The PIR and IR for JTF -Six
OPORDs frequently require units to
report on the locations, numbers,
dress, and types of arms carried by
civilians within National Forests,
and specifically address reporting
any type of "paramilitary" activity.
This information is included in the
post-mission INSUM which is then
turned over to JTF-Six J-2 and is
accessible by Operation Alliance; in
other words, the FBI, BATF, US
Border Patrol, and DEA, among
others.
Counter drug or internal security?
If you have been recently deployed
on a JTF-Six mission or an RSU
rotation and some of your mission
and reporting requirements did not
quite square with the official lie,
write us.
The Staff
 The RESISTER

FIELD REPORT: "Assault Gun"

SECOND AMENDMENT Ban Analysis
RALLY ''Minuteman"
3dSFG
Alexander Davidson
Washington D.C., 14 August, 1994 RECENT ban on military
tyle semi-automatic weapons
IS far more onerous than even
oF the oddities of political demonstrations is that those who do not pro-Second Amendment organiza-

O
NE
actually work for a living have the time, supporting front organizations, tions presume. Placed in context
and resources donated by altruists, do-gooders, and other socialists, with Clinton's Aprill9, 1994
communists, and influence peddlers to form mobs to protest this or the other remark, " ... there's too much
perceived inequity while carrying cardboard placards demanding that ground- personal freedom." and Senator
less theories, mindless philosophies, and range of the moment whims be given Eiden's recent statement that the
the same status as fact, reason, and reality. federal government will decide what
Those of us who actually work to earn our living do not have the idle luxury "people need," the purpose of the
to demonstrate in defense of our inalienable objective rights. ban is clear.
The Second Amendment Rally drew, we estimate, about 2,000 people. (Our Semi-automatic firearms cost
estimate is based on the area covered divided by approximately 3 square meters hundreds, if not thousands, of .
per person given the area covered and the mean dispersion). Bus loads of dollars. The majority of these
people arrived from Ohio, Illinois, and North Carolina. Individuals drove from weapons are not owned by collec-
as far away as Colorado and Alabama. tors, who are relatively well-off, and
We admit to being a little disappointed in the turnout when we heard the who obtain them for their own
first reports from our observers at the rally. But upon reflection we quickly esoteric purposes. Nor are they
came to realize that people who are in the right seldom think they are com- owned by "the poor," who could not
pelled to prove it to others. It is the liar who must shout down the truthful to be hope to splurge on an $800 to
heard, the incompetent who must denigrate the work of the competent to be $3,000 firearm. They are owned by
recognized, and the inept who must enslave the able to feign success. the middle-class; hard working, law
While the numbers of honest, competent, and able citizens who came to the abiding property owners.
rally may not be remarkable, the fact that most of them were willing to miss the Some possess them out of
following day or two of work to defend their right to bear arms against govern- nostalgia for their military service,
ment tyranny is. some for weekend plinking, some for
The media was conspicuous by their absence. Not one news agency arrived competitive shooting, some for self
to record and report on a rally by law abiding citizens opposing government protection, a few for hunting. Their
abrogation of their rights. If an equal number of homosexuals, drug addicts, motive is irrelevant because it is
communists, bean curd eaters, animal worshipers, minority tribalists, or their Constitutional and natural
common street garbage had staged a rally the carrion eaters of the media would right to own them.
have been there in force clucking their tongues wondering how these people Now, consider the legislative
could have suffered for so long. assaults against the middle-class for
Of the distinguished guests who were invited to attend only G. Gordon the past thirty years. Environmental
Liddy appeared and spoke. His message was clear and succinct: "You have no laws are anti-property. Economic
moral obligation to obey unconstitutional laws. When they tell you to register laws are anti-capitalism. Civil rights
your firearms--don't. When they tell you to turn in your firearms--don't." No laws are anti-individual. Education
argument from us. laws are anti -reason. The sole
Rush Limbaugh was too busy signing books in Colorado. purpose of federal anti-gun laws is
There was a consistent underlying theme that brought these people together anti-resistance.
to take a stand for their rights, unified them in their outrage against our There is a growing movement
unconstitutional federal government, and kept them focused on the very reason throughout America to form local
why the Second Amendment is the keystone of the Bill of Rights--Waco. militias. This movement is not .

Continued on page 8 Continued on page 15

Vol. I, No.2 7

Rally
Continued from page 7
Waco defined, in one act, the
federal government's true position
on the rights and individual liberties
guaranteed to all freemen by the
constitution.
Waco put the fear of tyrannical
government into every rational
person in this country. If ever there
was a war cry to mobilize resistance
to the vagaries of the federal
government, the nonobjectivity of
our undefined, undefinable, on-
judicable, and therefore unjust
firearms laws, that war cry is
"REMEMBER WACO!"
There is a small, but growing,
segment of the American public who
are aware that the BATF thugs who
assaulted a community of Christian
law abiding citizens were trained
and advised by members of 3d
Special Forces Group (Abn), under
the auspices of Operation Alliance
and Joint Task Force - Six. It was
with great interest therefore that our
observers at the Second Amendment
Rally learned that Mr. James Pate, a
free-lance journalist who uncovered
that fact and broke the story in
Soldier ofFortune, would speak at
the rally.
Mr. Pate began his speech at a
disadvantage; everything he had to
say about Waco had already been
said by Kirk Lyons, from Black
Mountain, NC, one of the defense
attorneys for the Waco defendants.
But then, Pate paused, held above
his head a grey document and
announced:
"There is a crisis of command in
our standing army. I am holding a
copy of The RESISTER: The
Official Publication of the StJecial
Forces Underground. This letter,
written by a soldier from 7th Special
Forces Group, expresses the con-
cerns of some members of the
Special Operations Community
about a government and it's ap-
pointed officers who order them to
oppress the citizens of this country:
8 Vol. I, No.2
The RESISTER
My friends and I are all in
agreement; our government is getting
out of control and the first time we
are given a mission to disarm the
citizens of this country we are going
to desert and join whatever guerrilla
movement demonstrates it is fighting
to restore the principles this country
was founded on ... "
As our observers edged their way
out of the crowd under cover of HC
and violet smoke, mixed, to cover
their break in contact, they heard the
crowd roar it's approval.
Approval. For the first time in
200 years elements of the United
States Army openly publicize their
intent to resist the policies of the
federal government and American
citizens publicly demonstrate their
approval.
Why? Because most people are
afraid of the government. It is a very
subtle fear. It is a fear resulting from
the uncertainty of legal status born
of the incomprehensibility of our
laws and their whimsical application
and enforcement.
One of our staff members has
remarked that his mother persis-
tently says, "Don't say things like
that over the phone!" Another points
out that most people are afraid to
join politically active organizations
because they don't want to wind-up
on "their" list.
The RESISTER has one answer
to those and other objections to
resisting tyranny-- "You behave like
someone who lives in a police state."
During their debriefing one of
our observers stated, "I don't know
how he (Pate) got hold of it (The
RESISTER). When he mentioned
Special Forces there were murmurs
of 'traitors,' and 'Quislings.' But
when he read the letter from ' John'
the crowd went crazy because they
found out we (The Resistance) were
with them. It may take twenty years,
but we' re going to win .. .I know that
now."
AMEN
• invite friends .
BTB
Melvil:
Paragraph 2 by sentence. Thank '
you. You're not the only one. We
call them "tobacco spitters." Whom,
lately, has said, "No?'' We know that.
I knew him; he fell into the same
trap as the "centurions."
Paragraph 3, start sentence 2.
You are correct, we' re working on it.
We know. You're right; we will
when it's possible. We know. Thank
you.
P.S. So are many others.
SGM:
Reference our telephone conver-
sation of 18 August 1994: Want to
put theory into practice?
Bruce:
It is impolite to discuss tradecraft.
Re: 1) He wouldn't; 2) Yes, yes, no;
3) No; irrelevant; 4) You mean nom
de plume. Would you take the
chance? You mean: agents provoca-
teurs.
Kyle:
Your plumbing business and
advertising are going to compromise
you. It's time to start behaving as
you believe.
Kevin:
You can do more for us outside.
Mr. Charles Peterson will contact
you soon. You are in a unique
position. If you are interested
inquire about Mr. Peterson's reading
habits.
Michael:
Brief resume required.
"Sentinal"
We need to talk. Details forth-
coming. Do not tell anybody. Do not
 The RESISTER
NWO Survey COMBAT ARMS SURVEY
Continued from page 1
This questionnaire is to gather data concerning the
to American civilians. attitudes of combat trained personnel with regards to
In February, 1994, Modern Gun magazine ran a story nontraditional missions. All of your responses are
on the elusive questionnaire which was subsequently confidential. Write your answers directly on the question-
circulated by various patriotic citizens groups. Then, on naire form. In Part II, place an "X'' in the space provided
10 May, 1994, the questionnaire was administered to for your response.
Marine Desert Storm veterans at Twenty-Nine Palms, CA.
A Marine smuggled a copy of the questionnaire out of the Part I. Demographics
testing center and mailed it on 15 May, 1994, with a cover
letter to the editor of The New American, which ran the 1. What service are you in?
story,in their July 11, 1994, issue. The New American
quotes the Marine's impression that the questionnaire 2. What is your pay grade? (e.g. E-7, 0-7)
"was just research for this (Navy) commander's(sp)
degree." The RESISTER obtained a copy of the Marine's 3. What is your MOS code and description?
letter, which actually states: "A Navy Commander came
before us and said he was working on his masters degree 4. What is your highest level of education in years?
and he was writing a paper about giving up our military's
soverenty(sp) to the United Nations Secretary General." 5. How many months did you serve in Operation
The official DOD lie surrounding the questionnaire, Desert Storm/Desert Shield?
entitled "Combat Arms Survey," supports that of the Navy
Commander. Significantly, the Combat Arms Survey was 6. How many months did you serve in Somalia?
first given at the time Presidential Decision Directive
(PDD) 25 was being prepared. The RESISTER's corre- 7. What state or country did you primarily reside in
spondent in the Pentagon staff of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during childhood?
confirms that PDD 25 surrenders control of the U..S.
military to the United Nations. (A cursory survey of Part II. Attitudes
articles written by MACOM commanders and staff
members in official military journals for the past year Do you feel that U.S. Combat troops should be used
reveals a universal acceptance of U.N. c~mtrol of tl1e within the United States for any of the following mis-
American military.)
sions?
The RESISTER has been eliciting responses to the
questionnaire for the past year. Frighteningly, among 8. Drug enforcement
service members with less than 10 years of service, 63% ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
agree, or strongly agree, witl1 question #46: "I would fire Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion
upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of
firearms banned by the U.S. government." Among new 9. Disaster relief (e.g. hurricanes, floods, fires,
recruits almost 90% give the response: "If it's the law earthquakes)
and they order me to do it I guess it 's okay." Our federally () () () () ()
controlled public schools have done their job. Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion
Of those with more than 15 years of service, 87%
replied "disagree" or "strongly disagree." Responses by 10. Security at national events (e.g. Olympic Games,
members of the Special Forces Underground were Super Bowl)
unprintable; basically, tl1ere will not be many officers who () () () () ()
give tlmt order more than once. Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion
The RESISTER has enclosed a copy of the Combat
Arms Survey with this issue. As you read it pay particular 11. Environmental disaster clean-up
attention to the qualifiers and their relation to recent () () () ( ()
articles in the official publications of the Department of Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion
Defense, the civilian media, and the policies of the federal
government. • 12. Substitute teachers in public schools
Editorial Note () () () () ()
The enclosed Combat Anus Survey is a true and accurate Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion
reproduction ofthe contents of the questiotmaire. We altered the format
to accommodate Tile RESISTER 's layout. The Editor
Continued on page }O

Vol. I, No.2 9
 The RESISTER

Combat Arms Survey

Continued from page 9

13. Community assistance programs (e.g. landscaping, 23. Humanitarian relief (e.g. food and medical supplies,
environmental clean-up, road repair, animal control) temporary housing, and clothing)
() () () () () () () () () ()
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion

14. Federal and state prison guards Do you feel that U.S. combat troops should be used in
() () () () () other countries, under command of non-U.S. officers
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion appointed by the United Nations for any of the following
missions? ·
15. National emergency police force
() () () ( ( ) 24. Drug enforcement
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion
16. Advisors to S.W.A.T. units, the FBI, or the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (B.A.T.F.) 25. Disaster relief (e.g. hurricanes, floods, fires, earth-
() () () () () quakes)
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion () () () () ()
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion
17. Border patrol (e.g. prevention of illegal aliens into
U.S. territory.) 26. Environmental disaster clean-up
() () () () () () () () ( ( )
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree N,o opinion Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion

27. Peace keeping

Do you feel that U.S. combat troops under U.S. ( ) ( ( ) ( ) ( )
command should be used in other countries for any of the Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion
following United Nations missions?
28. Nation building (Reconstruct civil government,·
18. Drug enforcement develop public school system, develop or improve public
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) transportation system, etc.)
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion () () () () ()
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion
19. Disaster relief (e.g. hurricanes, floods , fires,
earthquakes) 29. Humanitarian relief (e.g. food and medical supplies,
() () () () temporary housing, and clothing)
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion () () () () ()
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion
20. Environmental disaster clean-up
() () () ( ( ) 30. Police Action (e.g. Korea, Vietnam, but serving under
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion non-U.S. officers)
() () () () ()
21. Peace keeping Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion
( ) ( ( ) ( ) ( )
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion Consider the following statements:

22. Nation building (Reconstruct civil government, 31. The U.S. runs a field training exercise. U.N. combat
develop public school system, develop or improve public troops should be allowed to serve in U.S. combat units
transportation system, etc.) during these exercises under U.S. command and control.
() () () () () () () () () ()
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion

10 Vol. I, No.2
 The RESISTER

Combat Arms Survey

Continued from page 10

32. The United Nations runs a field training exercise. 41. I feel my unit's combat effectiveness would not be
U.S. combat troops under U.S. command and control affected by performing humanitarian missions for the
should serve in U.N. combat units during these exercises. United Nations.
() () () () () () () () () ()
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion

33. The United Nations runs a field training exercise. 42. I feel a designated unit of U.S. combat soldiers should
U.S. combat troops should serve under U.N. command be permanently assigned to the command and control of
and control during these exercises. the United Nations.
() () () () () () () () () ()
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion

34. U.S. combat troops should participate in U.N. 43. I would be willing to volunteer for assignment to a
missions as long as the U.S. has full command and U.S. combat unit under a U.N. commander.
control. () () () () ()
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion
44. I would like U.N. member countries, including the
35. U.S. combat troops should participate in U.N. U.S., to give the U.N. all the soldiers necessary to main-
missions under United Nations command and control. tain world peace.
() () () () () () () () () ()
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion

36. U.S. combat troops should be commanded by U.N. 45 . I would swear to the following code:
officers and non-commissioned officers (NCOs) at "I am a United Nations fighting person. I serve in the
battalion and company levels while performing U.N. forces which maintain world peace and every nation 's way
missions. of life. I an1 prepared to give my life in their defense."
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () () () () ()
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion

37. It would make no difference to me to have U.N. 46. The U.S. government declares a ban on the posses-
soldiers as members of my team. (e.g. fire team, squad, sion, sale, transportation, and transfer of all non-sporting
platoon) firearms . A thirty (30) day anmesty period is permitted for
() () () () () these firearms to be turned over the the local authorities.
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion At the end of tltis period, a number of citizen groups
refuse to turn over their firearms. Consider the following
38. It would make no difference to me to take orders from statement:
a U.N. company commander.
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government.
() () () () ()
39. I feel the President of the United States has the Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion
authority to pass his responsibilities as Commander-in-
Chief to the U.N. Secretary General.
() () () () () End Note
•
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion Our civilian readers my be wondering why the Combat Arms
Survey was circulated so heavily within the Department of the Navy.
40. I feel there is no conflict between my oath of office 1l1e reason is simple; the Navy is not subject to USC Title 10 Posse
Comitatus prohibitions against using federal military forces for
and serving as a U.N. soldier. domestic law enforcement. This includes the US Marine Corps.
() () () () () Just thought you would like to know.
Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion
The Staff

Vol. I, No.2 11
 The RESISTER
U.N. PLAN: One
PEACEKEEPING: World Government
What For? by 1995
Linda de Hoyos
Joseph Thomas
Human Development

TI
RECENT oRGY of articles about United Nations peacekeeping and
umanitarian assistance in Special Warfare magazine reveals a great
deal about where the United States military in general, and Special
TI port 1994, released by the
United Nations Human
Development Program on June 1,
Forces in particular, is being lead. 1994, sets forth a blueprint to .
Instead of focusing on the defense of this nation and the protection of vital destroy the sovereign nation-state
United States interests the U.S. military has become a slave service for the and replace it with a One World UN
wealth redistribution schemes of internationalists and gangs of weeping do- dictatorship by March 1995.
gooder mystics. One need simply note the circling of media carrion-eaters to The UNDP report, endorsed by
predict in which Third World toilet these altruists will next flush hundreds-of- UN Secretary-General Boutros
millions of tax dollars and the lives of U.S. service men. Boutros-Ghali, outlines plans for
Peacekeeping is a monumental fraud. It has nothing to do with peace and establishment of "world institutions"
even less with keeping it. Peacekeeping, and it's bastard offsprings--peacemak- with powers to dictate policies to
ing and peace enforcement--constitutes nothing less than the abrogation of government, while simultaneously
national sovereignty. The insinuation of U.N. agencies into the political fabric declaring was on nations of the
of the nations it "helps," the expropriation and redistribution of property and developing sector.
wealth, and the establishment of "democratically elected" socialist governments Under the ruse of a concept of
are actions that speak louder than the mushy rhetoric of U.N. cheerleaders in "human security" designed to
the federal government. replace the imperatives of national
In Somalia eighteen American slave-soldiers under U.N. command died, and security of sovereign countries, the
seventy-seven were wounded, for exactly nothing. They were not heroes, they UNDP report sets the agenda and
were sacrificial animals. At the same titne the circus sideshow man hunt for protocols for the March 1995 heads-
Adid was in full swing the United Nations was paying him over US$100,000 of-state summit on Social Develop-
monthly in protection money so altruists could deliver food to hoards of ment to be held in Copenhagen
starving irrelevancies. Vice President Gore consoled the parents of the victims Denmark. This summit is to follow
by telling them their sons died "in the service of the United Nations." (The this September's Cairo Conference
RESISTER is reliably informed it is a good thing he had his Secret Service on Population, where Boutros-Ghali
hoods with him at the time.) et al. are demanding that nations
Sergeants Major Steve Burback, a U.N. toady, conveniently sidesteps these agree to population reduction as the
facts in his groveling January 1994, Special Warfare article: The Blue Hel-
Continued on page 13
mets: A History of United Nations
Peacekeeping Forces. Burback
considers Somalia a success.
Motive
During the U.N. sponsored

E
Korean War (which the socialist
Truman called a "police action"),
military orders and directives sent
from the NCA and the Pentagon to
commanders in Korea were routinely
briefed to U.N. Military Staff
Committee members. This informa-
tion was then relayed to the North
Koreans and Chinese communists by
their allies, the Soviet Union. Lin
Piao, commander of communist
Chinese forces in Korea gloated, "I
Continued on page 13
You believe the Official Lie that the various Third World tribes which
rovide the U.N. with peacekeeping forces do so out of the kindness of their
eart, guess again. They do it for your tax money.
One example in particular is illustrative. When Zambia send its hoodlums to
Mozambique last year each soldier was paid US$300.00 per month by the U.N ..
Of course, the Zambian government looted more than half that money, but the
net result was that the deployed Zambian soldier's pay more than doubled. The
added benefit was that it got some of their armed gangs out of the country for a
while, thus reducing the threat of a coup.
There is an analogy to be drawn here. If the thugs and hoodlums of Third
World sewers get well paid by their U.N. masters (at least by their standards),
that at least makes them prostitutes--a known honorable profession.
United States peacekeepers get no extra pay. The RESISTER figures that
this makes U.S. Peacekeepers little more than common street sluts.

12 Vol. I, No.2

Peacekeeping
Continued from page 12
would never have made the attack
(across the Yalu, ed.) and risked my
men and military reputation if I had
not been assured that Washington
would restrain General MacArthur
from taking adequate retaliatory
measures against my lines of supply
and communication." The number of
American who soldiers died as a
result of this federal government
treason cannot be calculated.
The true intent ofUnited Nations
"peacekeeping" is best illustrated by
the 1960- 1964 ONUC (Operation
des Nations Unies au Congo), in
what is now the archetype U.N.
client state and IMF money sewer,
Zaire.
When Moise Kapenda Tshombe,
pro-west and anti-communist leader
of Katanga province declared
secession and independence from the
communist regime of Patrice
Lumumba, the United Nations, at
the behest of American liberals and
the Soviet Union deployed thousands
of pro-communist thugs on U.S.
transport aircraft to bring Katanga
back into line. Thousands died in
U.N. concentration camps, whites
were routinely murdered, and
civilian facilities were bombed by
U.N. aircraft (flown by Czeck and
Russian "technicians") between July
1960 and January 1962. (See:
Rebels, Mercenaries and Dividends,
by Smith Hempstone, 1962.)
Never in it's history has the
United Nations intervened on behalf
of a pro-west, pro-capitalist nation
under assault from conmmnist
subversion from within or socialist
aggression from without. Where was
the U.N. in Malaysia, VietNam,
Laos or Cambodia? Objections that
member states must appeal to the
United Nations for assistance are
irrelevant since their ideological
aggressors, communists and social-
ists, controlled (and still control) the
Security Council. The U.N. does not
send peacekeepers to the Middle
East to protect Israel, but to preserve
the lunatic Islamic nations who
Vol. I, No.2
The RESISTER
attacked her.
For what reason should the
United States throw away hundreds
of millions of dollars in so-called
foreign "aid" and risk the lives of
American servicemen to "save"
mobs of starving irrelevancies and
hoards of suffering abstractions at he
whim of the One World Socialists of
the United Nations? So New World
Order altruists can feel good about
themselves.
There are many who view the
mindless whimsy and senseless
rationalizing of American foreign
policy in general, and United
Nations peacekeeping in particular,
as an omnipotent conspiracy
masterminded by some malevolent
powerful giant. Lacking irrefutable
facts in proof of this contention The
RESISTER prefers to remain silent.
If there is a conspiracy we believe it
is more a conspiracy of philosophy
than a conspiracy of men.
The RESISTER contends that the
truth is far more horrible: at the
bottom of the cloying fog of stench
that surrounds U.N. peacekeeping
and American foreign policy is a
~ nest of scurrying cockroaches.
• to militarily intervene in the
UNHDP
Continued from page 12
criterion of economic performance.
The UNDP proposals, if imple-
mented, would create the enforce-
ment apparatus for such genocidal
aims.
Specifically, the UNDP report
calls for the creation of a World
Court, with powers to subpoena
nations; A World Police; A World
Bank, which would give the Interna-
tional Monetary Fund sole power to
enforce austerity on nations; A
World Treasury; An Economic
Security Council, with a mandate to
interfere in those states that do not
conform to UN protocols for
"population reduction" or "free
trade" liberalization; A World Trade
and Production Organization, which
would not only regulate "free trade"
but also dictate production quotas to
nations.
To fund its One World govern-
ment the UNDP report calls for
global taxation. This is to include
taxes on pollution, taxes on 'sav-
ings' from demilitarization, taxes on
all foreign exchange transactions,
and a global income tax on nations
whose people average an income
above US$10,000 per year.
Genocide: The Aim
The UN requires such global
power of dictatorship, the report
makes clear, in order to enforce
population reduction. The biggest
threat to "human security," the
report states on page 34, is "un-
checked population growth." The
report states that by the year 2015,
world population must be stabilized
at 7.3 billion. For this goal to be
reached, nations must "commit
themselves to ... participating in
annual reviews of the 20 :20 com-
pact," to be held as joint donor-
recipient meetings on 'each country
as well as annual reviews in the
Economic Security Council.
Further, the UNDP demands that,
while the UN heightens its powers
sovereign territory of any nation, the
militaries of developing countries
must be dismantled, their national
security stripped. The UNDP report
lists five cases in which UN Blue
Helmet troops must be deployed into
the internal conflicts of nations:
"mass slaughter of the population of
the state, decimation through
starvation or the withholding of
health or other services, forced
exodus, occupation and the denial of
the right to self-determination, (and)
environmental destruction."
To understand what this means,
at the behest of British Prime
Minister Lord Palmerson, UN
"Peace-makers" would have inter-
vened to protect the secession of the
Confederacy from the Union during
the American Civil War.
At the same time, under the title
"special contributions," the UNDP
endorses a call by Oscar Arias,
Continued on page 15
13
 The RESISTER

BOOK REVIEWS apparently random whim issues--but

by conscious adherence to the ideal
of individual rights.
This history begins with the
ideological foment of 1761. The use
of "writs of assistance" --blanket
THE RIGHT AND WRONG OF COMPULSION BY THE search warrants, designed to curb
STATE, by Auberon Herbert smuggling and giving their bearers
the right to search any ship or
lile not many people know his name, England's Auberon Herbert

W
building they chose--was legally
1838-1906) was a profound defender of capitalism. He wrote challenged as an assault on Ameri-
eloquent, uncompromising, and philosophically insightful defenses of cans' rights.
individual rights. Politics, he says, must be "the battle of the principles ... the Langguth summarizes the case
principle of liberty against the principle of force." made by the British attorney:
Herbert presents his views intransigently and articulately: "True liberty "Which was more important,
cannot exist apart from the full rights of property, for property is the only protecting the liberty of an indi-
crystallized form of free faculties .. .The whole meaning of socialism is a vidual or collecting the taxes
systematic glorification offorce ... No literary phrases about social organisms are efficiently? Gathering public money
potent enough to evaporate the individual, who is the prime, indispensable, must take precedence." On the other
irreducible element." hand, James Otis, the attorney for
Herbert readily applies these same principles to show the evils of unlimited the colonists, argued that "every
democratic rule. "How should it happen that the individual should be without man was his own sovereign ... No
rights, but that the combination of individuals should possess unlimited other creature on earth could
rights?" legitimately challenge a mans right
But he does not regard the issue of force as a primary. Instead, he under- to his life, his liberty and his
stands that it depends on something far more fundamental: the value of reason. property. That principle, that
"Force and reason--which last is the essence of the moral act--are at the two unalterable law, took ·
opposite poles," he argues. "The man who compels his neighbor... treats him, precedence ... even over the survival
not as a being with reason, but as an animal in whom reason is not." of the state."
Because of Herbert's conm1itment to reason, religion too is a target of his When Otis finished, "something
withering attacks: "Socialism is but Catholicism addressing itself not to tl1e profound changed America" --i.e.,
soul but to the sense of men." Both implore one to "accept authority, accept the individual rights had been invoked
force which it employs, resign yourself to all-powerful managers, give up the to limit state power.
free choice and the free act ... They both of them seek to sacrifice man." The The heroes who made the
basic difference, he remarks, is that socialism "is a creed even more denigrating Revolution were men like Samuel
than Catholicism, but it offers more tangible bribes for its acceptance." Adams, the ascetic Puritan who
Writing at the end of the 19th century, as attacks on capitalism began to stir, inflamed the mob in Boston--Patrick
this unconm10n thinker declares: "It is not laissez-faire that has failed. That Henry, the brilliant orator whose
would be an ill day for men. What has failed is the courage to see what is true "Give me liberty or give me death"
and speak it to the people, to point to tl1e true remedies." became the rallying cry for Ameri-
can troops--George Washington,
whose patrician integrity inspired
his soldiers while his aggressive
PATRIOTS: The Men Who Started the American Revolution, tactics won the war--Thomas
by A.J. Langguth Jefferson, whose commitment to
rights persuaded the Continental
urn off the evening news, put down your novel, and read this book. The Congress to endorse his Declaration
happenings in Patriots are as relevant as the day's headlines and as of Independence.
compelling as any "page-turner" --it is the story of the events that created Reading this book will inspire
the United States. you. •
America's unique revolution was a war guided by intellectual activists. The
HRLER DTTIA LRCRT ABNRS WEIIP CSCIR
incidents in this book may seem similar to those covered by contemporary
LIIHO AHUGN DITGI SPYEA MERYA HUYHT
journalists--mass protests of unpopular political decisions; legislatures wran-
KETTD ATRFM INRXF VUWQL THCAH WDTIA
gling over the imposition of new taxes; soldiers firing into a violent mob and
XAMWA HBTMA NMWAP EISOT BROYA MIAPF
inciting further demonstrations; a rebellious people taking over the government ZORTP JWVNJ ODSJU TYISN AKIRD BYDJC
of a country. However, these events were driven not by blind emotions and LEBSU QVRFT OMSTG INYVR SCEGR RELRH

14 Vol. I, No.2

UNHDP
Continued from page 13
former President of Costa Rica and
Nobel Peace Prize winner, for
developing nations to fully demobi-
lize their armed forces. Arias calls
for a Global Demilitarization Fund,
managed by the UN, that would dish
out money to developing countries
who make efforts to "disarm and
demobilize their armed forces,
reintegrate military people into
society, and promote gun control."
Through the Economic Security
Council, demilitarization would
become a new condition for any aid
or loans to developing nations.
Demand for Disintegration
The UNDP report has already
drawn the wrath of some developing
countries for the inclusion in the
report of a "hit list" of countries
which the report says are either in a
state of crisis, or on the verge of
crisis, and therefore warrant UN
"preemptive action."
Targeted are Afghanistan,
Angola, Haiti, Iraq, Mozambique,
Sudan, Zaire, Burundi, Georgia,
Liberia, Rwanda, and Tajikistan.
The report further cites Brazil,
South Africa, Egypt, Mexico, and
Nigeria as vulnerable to disintegra-
tion due to "unequal distribution of
resources." Of these nations Egypt,
Mexico, and Nigeria were also
targets ofthe 1970's National
Security Memorandum 200, written
by Henry Kissinger, which declares
that population reduction is a
national security goal of the United
States.
In the press conference which
released the Human Development
Report, UNDP index designer
Mabubhul Haq, an IMF flunky and
former Pakistani Finance Minister
in the early 1980's, indicated that
countries which do not submit to the
parameters of the UNDP "Human
Development Index" will be hit with
insurgencies modeled on that of this
year's Chiapas uprising of "indig-
enous people" in southern Mexico.
Vol. I, No.2
The RESISTER
PERSONALS
Mr. Richard White's Texas ranch
is ideally suited for the grazing of
large herds of cattle.
The King's Mountain Model
Railroad Club will hold its quarterly
meeting at the Charlotte address.
Topic: Switching yards or spur lines,
which is the greater modeling
challenge?
Mr. Howard Devon, of Medford
Wisconsin, wishes to announce the
Medford Gardening Club will now
hold their monthly meetings every
third Wednesday. The next meeting
will be a seminar on sunflowers.
The Sand Hills Bird Watchers
Society will conduct its 1st Annual
Membership Drive throughout the
month of October. Clara Miller, vice
president, reminds prospective
members to provide their own
optics. The club's Guide to Birds
will be provided at no cost.
• ATTN: AOJK-CO
Haq, in fact, revealed the UNDP had
done a detailed study ofChiapas
seven months before the January
1994 insurgency was launched.
A mere coincidence? Haq further
said the UNDP is now engaged in
similar 'studies' of regional dispari-
ties in Egypt, Nigeria, and Brazil.
Despite the liberal distribution of
the word "human" throughout the
UNDP report human beings are not
a high priority. James Gustave
Speth, head of the UNDP, was the
project director for the Carter
administration's Global 2000 report
which demanded that the world
population be reduced to 2 billion by
the year 2000. •
HORROR FILE
Library
Continued from page 5
We will point out that the
Marquat Memorial Library contains
the collected works of Marx, Lenin,
Stalin, Mao, Hitler's Mein Kampf,
and at least something representing
the philosophy of every brand of
collectivism, socialism, statism,
tribalism, and anarchy. Obviously,
the Chain of Command considers
those works perfectly acceptable
reading for our soldiers.
The RESISTER's message of
strict constitutionalism, isolation-
ism, laissez-faire capitalism,
individual rights, limited govern-
ment, and republicanism, is consid-
ered subversive.
It is tempting to hold MAJ Prugh
accountable for his action, but we
know he was just an "errand boy
sent by grocery clerks;" an errand
boy who held mandatory "Homo-
sexuality Sensitivity Training" for
all USAJFKSWCS instructors and
staff throughout August, 1994.
Major General Garrison's address
is:
Commander
USAJFKSWCS
Fort Bragg, North Carolina
28307-5000
(910) 432-4404
Analysis
Continued from page 7 .
universal, nor is it well advertised,
but it is expanding with the growing
recognition that the myriad incom-
prehensible laws passed in the last
thirty years were never intended to
serve their stated purpose.
If you are not a member of a non-
state approved militia, join one. If
there is none where you live, form
one--in secret. When the time
comes we will find you and assist
you. •
15
 The RESISTER

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

In The Next Issue:

.,.. How the Second Amendment Will Be Abrogated By UN Treaty
.,.. Why NAFTA is Anti-Capitalism
.,.. How Democracy Subverts the Constitution
.,.. The True Nature ofRights
-plus-
Our Usual Features
Ask for the Winter Issue in January; somebody will have it.

16 Vol. I, No.2