Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Udhyakumar 511918631044
Udhyakumar 511918631044
Udhyakumar 511918631044
ANNA UNIVERSITY
CHENNAI-600025
JUNE-2020
1
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
2
DECLARATION
I D. UDHAYAKUMAR, Reg.No.511918631044bonafide student of Department of
Management Studies Priyadarshini Engineering College, Vaniyambadi would I like to declare that
the project work titled “A STUDY ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION TOWARDS R CUBE
ELECTRIC PRIVATE LIMITED BANGALORE”. Is an original work done by me submitted
in partial fulfillment of the award of “Master of Business Administration” of Anna University,
Chennai.
Date:
Place: Signature:
(D.UDHAYAKUMAR )
(511918631044)
3
R CUBE ENERGY MANAGEMENT & AUTOMATION SOLUTIONS (P) Ltd
Issued by
Mr.R.Jayakumar. Director-Technical
R Cube Energy Management &
Automation Solutions (P) Ltd
CIN NO.U31104KA2010PTCO53900
e- 560072.Tel:+918023212323
4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
5
CONTENT
3.2 SUGGESTION 66
3.3 CONCLUSION 67
APPENDIX 68
BIBILIOGRAPHY 70
6
LIST OF TABLES& CHARTS
7
2.3.24 SAFETY 54
2.3.26 56
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
2.3.27 HANDLING OF COMPLAINT 57
8
ABSTRACT
The present work develops a research r cube electric based on a systematic literature review
of customer satisfaction in electrical power supply services, applying for this purpose the Cochrane
method. Research trends could be identified through the lens of service operations, and they are
presented mostly using a Frequency analysis
9
CHAPTER-I
10
1.1-INTRODUCTION
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
IMPORTANTS:
Customer satisfaction is extremely important because it is the way of getting feedback from the
customers in a way that they can use it to manage and improve their business. Customer
satisfaction is the best indicator of how the business looks like in the future.
11
Customer satisfaction helps in doing SWOT analysis that could help them to develop their
business in an advance and in a systematic way.
satisfaction information (both positive and negative) can help guide the organization to
address issues related to meeting stated customer’s requirements. It can also help the
organization to understand and address the customer’s expectations, or issues related to the
customer’s perception of the delivered product or the organization, and thereby enhance
customer satisfaction
12
understand the expectations and requirements of customers, determine, how company
and its competitors meet these expectations and requirements,prepare services and products
based on information obtained as a result of the survey, find out, what current trends are in offer, to
take an immediate action, establish priorities, objectives and standards, to assess how company has
achieved it,assess the impact of changes in politics, corporate strategy, products and services.
➢ Identification of criteria which play a key role in evaluating the product or service by
customers,
➢ Research the perception of a product or service by customers,
➢ Assessing the fulfillment of customer expectations for product or service,
➢ Research the level of customer satisfaction with a cooperation with the company,
➢ Comparing the level of customer satisfaction with products of the competition,
➢ Understanding the main factors of customer satisfaction, affecting positively and
negatively on the level of satisfaction,
➢ Determining customer’s expectations connected with attributes of a product or service,
➢ Identifying the most important customer service elements,
➢ Determining the degree of importance of individual factors influencing the customer
service.
So far there is not one universal method in the customer satisfaction measuring. Each
measurement is exposed to error of estimate, because it is extremely difficult to measure human
emotional response. Therefore, it is very important to learn all capabilities and limitations before
making a decision concerning the choice of a specific methods. The companies, which explore the
degree of customers satisfaction with services, usually apply the set of methods and measures.
Choosing the methods depends on their specificity.
The Kano model is a theory for product development and customer satisfaction developed in
the 1980s by Professor Noriaki KanoThe Kano Model is used to visually model the customer
provided characteristics versus the level of satisfaction each characteristic delivers. It is a product
development and customer satisfaction tool that categorizes customer preferences.. This tool
is used after gathering the Voice of the Customer (VOC) phase
13
KANO MODEL
1. Research and brainstorm all of the possible features and attributes of your product or
service, and everything you can do to please your customers.
2. Classify these as Threshold, Performance or Excitement Attributes and add a fourth type,
Not Relevant. These are the things that don't add value because customers don't care about
them.
3. Make sure that your product or service has all of the essential Threshold Attributes. If
necessary, eliminate some Performance Attributes so that you can include these features.
4. Assess the Excitement Attributes, and think about how you can incorporate some of them
into your product or service. Again, if necessary, cut some Performance Attributes, so that
you can afford to invest in your Excitement Attribute.
5. Choose the Performance Attributes that you can deliver at a competitive price, while still
maintaining an acceptable profit margin.
14
1.2 OBJECTIVES FOR THE STUDY:
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES
15
1.3- SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The Study on Customer Satisfaction towards R’ Cube Electric Private Limited Bangalore
➢ The success and failure of the company is purely based on Customer satisfaction
➢ In order to retain the customer and also to attract the new customer the company has to
concentrate more .
➢ It helps in finding competitor strength as well as its weakness.
➢ It is helpful to perceive the customers.
➢ It is help ful to understand and analyze the factors that influence the customer .
16
1.4-LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
LIMITATION:
17
1.5-COMPANY PROFILE
Company overview
Mission;
Our mission is to use the most advanced technology products along with the most qualified
Engineers to provide the innovative solutions for our clients.
Founded By:
Kumaresan
Jayakumar
Ramamoorthy
⚫ Bangalore (HO)
⚫ Mangalore (Branch)
⚫ Hosur
⚫ Belgaum
⚫ Bellary
⚫ Chennai (Branch)
Team Strength
Applications – 20 Engineers
Administrative Staffs – 5
18
Applications Handling
Standard Applications
Special Applications
-ABB Motor
-ACS800 Drive
-ACS800/DCS800
-AC500 PLC
-ACSM1 Drive
-AC500 PLC
◆ Test Rigs
-ACS800/ACS850
19
-ACSM1
-AC500 PLC
-ABB Motor
◆ Winder
-ACS850 / ACSM1
-AC500 PLC
-ABB Motor
-ACSM1 Drive
-AC500 PLC
Monitoring
The Monitoring Module displays voltage, current, power, energy, and demand data from
remote intelligent electrical devices throughout a facility.
Log and trend data from meters, relays, and breaker trip units in order to analyze the power
system.
Highlight and acknowledge unusual activity and alarm conditions with the real-time and
historical alarm viewers to ensure that problems do not go unnoticed
Power Quality
The Power Quality module remotely captures disturbances on the electrical network such as
total harmonic distortion, individual harmonic distortion, and sub-cycle transients.
Event logs of triggered high speed electrical disturbances are displayed in a prioritized list
that is automatically written to a database file.
Event triggered waveform recordings and out-of-limit logs provide an accurate system-wide
depiction of power disturbances and allow for forensic analysis.
Cost Allocation
The Cost Allocation Module is an energy management tool that aggregates energy data to
create usage reports
Generate individual bills for user defined cost centers that show total energy and peak
demand power use, based on Time of Use (TOU) schedules, seasonal schedules, and utility rate
structures
20
Rate structure simulators highlight the revenue impact of power supplier changes and load
shifting
Control & Automation module executes energy management strategies by automating load-
shedding schemes to minimize energy charges.
Employ automatic transfer schemes to ensure continuous power for mission critical
processes by automatically switching to stable power feeds and shedding load when appropriate.
Summary of Benfits
21
1.6 -INDUSTRY PROFILE
Introduction:
India’s Electrical Equipment Industry can be broadly segmented into following two sectors: •
Generation equipment (boilers, turbines, generators) • Transmission & distribution (T&D)
equipment includes energy meters, transformers, cables, transmission lines, switchgears, capacitors
etc.
The generation equipment sector accounts 15% of the total market, while T&D equipment sector is
estimated to account for 85% of the total market. In the last couple of years, the Government has
been taking transformative change in the power sector for achieving its ambitious target of
providing affordable 24x7 power for all its citizens. It has taken several initiatives such as
increasing private participation in the transmission segment, increasing contribution of renewables
in the energy basket, developing the National Power Grid to boost growth in the T&D
(transmission and distribution) industry, etc.
India is the world's third largest producer and consumer of electricity. The electricity production is
stood around 1,201.54 billion units during FY18, up 3.57% from the previous year. An indication
of growing appetite for electricity in India, the country's per capita electricity consumption has
reached 1149kWh
Current status
The industry contributes 8.1% of the manufacturing sector in terms of value and 1.35% of India’s
GDP, providing a direct employment to 5 lakh persons and indirect employment to 10 lakh people
and over 50 lakhs across the entire value chain.
Significant infrastructure investments have been planned across the generation, transmission and
distribution segments to realize this target. Government in its “Indian Electrical Equipment
Industry Mission Plan 2012-2022” plans to increase power generation capacity from 200 GW in
2012 to about 400 GW by 2022 with commensurate T&D capacity enhancement, Indian EE
manufacturers not only have to meet demand of such huge capacity addition, but also that of
metros, airports, railways, other infrastructure projects and increase in domestic consumer demand
too. The growth of the Indian power sector will entail exponential demand for electrical equipment.
Expected investment in the 12th Five Year Plan period in the generation and T&D segment was
INR 6,390 billion (€79 billion) in generation, INR 1,800 billion (€22 bn) in transmission and ` INR
3,060 billion (€37.9 bn) in distribution. Based on investment estimates and capacity addition
22
targets, domestic demand for generation equipment (BTG) could be in the range of €22-26 billion
by 2022; for the T&D equipment industry, it may be €61–66 billion.
Exports of Electrical Equipment from India have been growing steadily. During 2017-18, exports
registered an annual growth of around 6.4% and stood at around INR 418 billion (~€5.2 billion) as
compared to around INR 393 billion (€4.9 billion) in 2016-17.
According to IEEMA, the growth in exports is helping the industry to grow especially in power
transformer & high voltage switchgear products, energy meters, and cables. The major export
markets for Indian Electrical Equipment are United States of America, United Arab Emirates,
Germany, United Kingdom, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Australia, Brazil, Canada, and France.
The major Export Products are Switchgear and Control gear, Transformers & Parts, Industrial
Electronics, Cables, Transmission Line Towers, Conductors, Rotating Machines (Motors, AC
Generators, and Generating Sets) & Parts.
A smart meter is an electronic device that records consumption of electricity, gas or water and
communicates that information for monitoring and billing. Smart meters send meter readings to the
utility company automatically. They also come with in-home displays, which give users real-time
feedback on their energy or water usage and what it is costing. With electricity demand expected
to rise by 79% in the next 10 years, India is on a path of transforming its energy mix with
innovation. Along with enhancing energy production, the nation also needs to cut Aggregate
Technical and Commercial (AT&C) losses to below 12% by 2022, and below 10% by 2027.
Market players
23
I. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL):
ABB India is operating mainly in power, heavy electrical equipment and automation technology
areas. ABB is leading builder of electricity grids. The company is active into many sectors and
mainly operating into power and automation technologies. ABB is planning to install microgrid
with battery energy storage at the campus of Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee (IITR) as
part of the smart campus development project.
Diamond Power Infrastructure Limited manufactures and sells power transmission equipment.
The company provides wires and cables, transmission and distribution conductors, power and
distribution transformers, transmission towers, control and relay panels, and isolators. It also
engages in planning, designing, and commissioning of turnkey transmission and distribution
projects.
Indian Electrical Equipment Industry Mission plan seeks to steer, coordinate and synergise the
efforts of all stakeholders to accelerate and sustain the growth of the domestic electrical equipment
industry. It identifies five key areas for action:
24
CHAPTER-II
25
2.1 - REVIEW OF LITREATURE
INTRODUCTION:
Both public and private sectors have given much attention to the concept of customer
Satisfaction in the past couple of decades. Naturally, administrators have requested their staff to do
customer satisfaction studies for their own organization. An analyst or researcher must
Operationalize the concept of customer satisfaction in order to measure it. More importantly,
inorder for any measurements to have validity, that analyst needs to assume some model of the
subject matter. The analyst must use very explicit conceptualizations of the subject matter (in other
words, models) if she/he expects to do research and analysis that has relevance for organizational
decisions.
In this paper, we try to provide the analyst an overview models of customer satisfaction.
These models come from a vast literature from the marketing research discipline. This pool of
research includes models that integrate the concept of customer satisfaction in a network of related
concepts, such as value, quality complaining behavior, and lechnical peroyalty. In this paper, we
will label these the policy-level implications of an organization's research in customer satisfaction.
Macro models give the researcher the strategic context of the design and of the results for a study
of customer satisfaction.
MACRO - MODELS:
To begin this discussion about customer satisfaction it well help to define customer
satisfaction. A widely accepted definition would be the following.
➢ Comparison standards can come from numerous sources that can vary widely by
individually situation, and by product/service type.
➢ Satisfaction feeling is a state of mind, an attitude. The phrase "mixed feelings" applies
here,as a consumer may have different levels of satisfaction for different parts of product,
service experience.
3. Norms Models
5. Attribution Models
6. Affective Models
7. Equity Models
➢ The Expectations Disconfirmation Model has been the dominant model in satisfaction
research. The model has consumers using pre-consumption expectations in a comparison
with post-consumption experiences of a product/service to form an attitude of satisfaction
or dis satisfaction toward the product/service. In this model, expectations originate from
beliefs about the level of performance that a product/service will provide.
➢ The Perceived Performance Model deviates from the model #1 above in that expectations
play a less significant role in satisfaction formation. The model performs especially well I
situations where a product/service performs so positively that the consumer's expectations
get discounted in her/his post-consumption reaction to the product, service.
➢ Norms Models resemble the Expectations Disconfirmation Model in that the consumer
compares perceived performance with some standard for performance. In this case,
however, the standard is not a predictive expectation. Rather than considering what will
happen in the consumption experience, the consumer uses what should happen as the
comparison standard.This is the normative meaning of "should rather than its occasional
chronological connotation in the English language.
➢ Affective Models differ from previous models in that it goes beyond rational processes. In
these models, emotion, liking, and mood influence (dis)satisfaction feelings following the
consumption experience.
➢ Equity Models emphasize the consumer's attitude about fair treatment in the consumption
process. Fair treatment can use the concept of the equity ratio (that is, the amount of her/his
27
2.2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
METHODOLOGY
Data collection is most essential aspect of any research because the whole result of research
depend on the data and information hence, the methodology adopted by me to collect the data final
interpretation were through
1. Survey research:
This kind of research finds factor with almost all the social science researches. It is one of
the most popular methods of investigation, because a study of the attribute and variables in relation
to the population (the entire group of people, inhabitants, items etc.... under study) is casier and is
more accurate.
Its suffers from a negligible Magnitude of error.now-a-days sample survey has become an
effective method for research. this is possible with the help of the personal interviews which are
backed by questionnaires, direct oral observations, indirect oral observations
And etc.......
Meaning: primary source of data are the data which need the personal efforts to collect it
and which are not readily available. Primary sources of data are the other type of sources thorough
which the data was collected.
(a) Questionnaires: its set of questions on a sheet of paper was being given to the response of the
fill it, based on whi the data was interpreted.
(b)Direct interviewing: direct interviewing involved in the process where I asked the questions
directly to the customer and get the feedback.
Secondary source of the other important sources through which the data were collected.
There are readily available sources if the data where on had need not put much efforts to collect,
because it is already have been and part in an elderly manner by some researchers, expect and
socialites.
Text books like marketing management, research methodology, advertisement and sales
promotion
4. Library survey:
This was also undertaken for the collection of data, this type of research is based on books
like periodical, documentation, and secondary data etc.... Which are available in the library.
5. Sample size:
By using random judgment random sampling technique 80 responds are selected for the
purpose of the study. Direct quaternaries are used to survey the customers.
PRIMARY DATA:
The primary data are those, which are collected a fresh and for the first time. The
information required for the study was directly collected from the responds by the using
questionnaires methods and interview method.
QUTIONNARIE METHOD:
The questionnaires were prepared for survey according to the specification of the study.
INSTRUMENT DESIDN:
• Open-ended questions
• Close-ended questions
• Dichotomous
• Multi-choice
OPEN-ENDED QUESTION:
I means respondents are given freedom to express their views freely. it allows the
respondents to answer in a free following format without restricting the range of choices to a
specific alternative suggested by the rescarches and the questionnaires should include an open
ended questions at the end allowing respondents to commend on any aspect the choose.
CLOSE-ENDED QUESTION:
29
DICHOTOMOUS QUESTION:
It means two alternatives are given, a positive and negative one. the dichotomous scale is
used to yes or no answer.
MULTI-CHOICE:
It means multiple items are given respondents to elicit a single response. It is a statistical
technique which allows us to study the difference between 2 or more group of objectives or
individuals with respect to several variables simultaneously.
It depend variable is not internally scaled, we use discriminator analysis other wise
regression analysis. discriminator function analysis is used to determine which variables
discriminates between two or more naturally occurring groups.
INTERVIEW METHOD:
Personal interview was concluded with the help of a questionnaires prepare for the survey.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
Sampling size : 80
• Frequencies analysis
FREQUENCIES ANALYSIS:
Frequencies analysis is used to find the percent value for the different questions used.
Frequencies are used in making comparison between two or more series of data
30
CHI SQUARE TEST:
Chi square test is useful measure of comparing experimentally obtained results with those
stall artiscally expected there for it measure to study the divergence of actual and expected
frequencies
(O-E)
0 = observed frequency
E = expected frequency
31
2.3 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
TABLE NO -2.3.1
Frequencies
Median 1.00
Mode 1
From the above table it is observed that 68.8% of the respondents are male, and 31.3% of
the respondents are belongs to female.
CHART NO-2.3.1
32
TABLE NO -2.3.2
Frequencies
Interpretation:
From the table it is inferred that 35% of respondents are age between 31 to 40 years, 32.5%
of respondents are aged between 23 to 30 years, 18.8% of respondents are aged between 41 to 50
years, 13.8 of respondents are aged between above 50 years.
CHART NO -2.3.2
33
TABLE NO -2.3.3
Frequencies
Statistics
Q3. What best describes your marital status? Q3. What best describes
your marital status?
Valid N Valid 80
Frequency Percent Percent
Missing 0
Valid Married 48 60.0 60.0
Mean 1.40
Unmarried 32 40.0 40.0
Median 1.00
Total 80 100.0 100.0
Mode 1
Interpretation:
From the table above table 60% of the respondents married, 40% of the respondents are
unmarried.
CHART NO -2.3.3
34
TABLE NO -2.3.4
Frequencies Statistics
Interpretation:
From the table above table 66.3% of the respondents are under graduate, 33.8% of the respondents
post graduate.
CHART NO -2.3.4
35
TABLE NO -2.3.5
Frequencies Statistics
Q5. Do you know about R cube service? Q5. Do you know about R
cube service?
Valid N Valid 80
Frequency Percent Percent
Missing 0
Valid YES 65 81.3 81.3
Mean 1.19
NO 15 18.8 18.8
Median 1.00
Total 80 100.0 100.0
Mode 1
Interpretation:
From the table above table 81.3% of the repondents are yes, 18.8% of the respondents are
no.
CHART NO -2.3.5
36
TABLE NO -2.3.6
Frequencies
Q6. How did you know about R cube electric product? Statistics
Interpretation:
From the table, it is inferred that 33.8% of the respondents are friends, 25% of the
respondents retailer, 15% of the respondents dealers, 13.8% of the respondents advertisement,
12.5% of the respondents others.
CHART NO 6
37
TABLE NO -2.3.7
Frequencies
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 32.5% of the respondents are 3 years, 25% of
the respondents 2 years, 17.5% of the respondents 1 years, 13.8% of the respondents 4 years or
more, 11.3% of the respondents 1 to 6 months.
CHART NO -2.3.7
38
TABLE NO -2.3.8
Frequencies
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 38.8% of respondents are definitely, 27.5% of
the respondents are probably, 18.8% of the respondents are might or not might, 15% of the
respondents are never used.
CHART NO -2.3.8
39
TABLE NO -2.3.9
Q9. When you contracted our customer service team were all issues resolved to your complete
satisfaction?
Valid Frequencies
Frequency Percent Percent
Mode 1
From the table above table, it is inferred that 42.5% of the respondents are yes, by the
company its representatives, 23.8% of the respondents are Yes, by me or someone outside the
company, 17.5% of the respondents No, the problem was not resolved, 16.3% of the respondents
No problems no contact with customer service.
CHART NO -2.3.9
40
TABLE NO -2.3.10
Frequencies
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 37.5% of the respondents are very well, 27.5%
of the respondents are extremely well, 20% of the respondents are somewhat well,15% of the
respondents are not well at all.
CHART NO -2.3.10
41
TABLE NO -2.3.11
Frequencies
Valid Statistics
Frequency Percent Percent
Q11. How likely you to
Valid Extremely 23 28.7 28.7 repurchase the service of R
likely cube company?
Very likely 21 26.3 26.3 N Valid 80
Something 16 20.0 20.0 Missing 0
likely
Mean 2.51
Not so likely 12 15.0 15.0
Median 2.00
Not at all likely 8 10.0 10.0
Mode 1
Total 80 100.0 100.0
Std. Deviation 1.322
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 28.7% of the respondents are extremely likely,
26.3% of the respondents are very likely, 20% of the respondents are something likely, 15% of the
respondents are not so likely, 10% of the respondents are not at all likely.
CHART NO -2.3.11
42
TABLE NO -2.3.12
Frequencies
Q12. Based on your experience with R cube service would you recommend this to other firm or
individual? Statistics
Frequenc Valid
y Percent Percent
Q12. Based on your
Valid Definitely will 21 26.3 26.3 experience with R cube
service would you
Probably will 26 32.5 32.5 recommend this to other
Might or Might 18 22.5 22.5 firm or individual?
not N Valid 80
Probably will not 8 10.0 10.0 Missing 0
Definitely will 7 8.8 8.8 Mean 2.42
not
Median 2.00
Total 80 100.0 100.0
Mode 2
From the table above table, it is inferred that 32.5% of the respondents are probably will,
26.3% of the respondents are definitely will, 22.5% of the respondents are might or might not, 10%
of the respondents are probably will not, 8.8% of the respondents are definitely will not
CHART NO -2.3.12
43
TABLE NO -2.3.13
Frequencies
Q13. Would you recommend our product and service to other people?
Valid Statistics
Frequency Percent Percent
Q13. Would you
Valid Definitely 22 27.5 27.5 recommend our product and
service to other people?
Probable 26 32.5 32.5
N Valid 80
Not sure 17 21.3 21.3
Missing 0
Probably not 9 11.3 11.3
Mean 2.39
Definitely 6 7.5 7.5
not Median 2.00
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 32.5% of the respondents are probable, 27.5%
of the respondents are definitely, 21.3% of the respondents are not sure, 11.3% of the respondents
are probably not, 7.5% of the respondents are definitely not.
CHART NO -2.3.13
44
TABLE NO -2.3.14
Frequencies
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 31.3% of the respondents are strongly agree,
28.7% of the respondents are agree, 17.5% of the respondents are not applicable, 13.8% of the
respondents are disagree, 8.8% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
CHART NO -2.3.14
45
TABLE NO -2.3.15
Frequencies
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 42.5% of the respondents are highly satisfied,
23.8% of the respondents are satisfied, 17.5% of the respondents are neutral, 16.3% of the
respondents are dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.15.1
46
TABLE NO -2.3.16
Frequencies
Statistics
Valid
Frequency Percent Percent Q15.2. Variety of Solutions
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 35% of the respondents are neutral, 22.5% of
the respondents are satisfied, 16.3% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 15% of the respondents
are dissatisfied, 11.3% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.16
47
TABLE NO -2.3.17
Frequencies
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 30% of the respondents are neutral, 26.3% of
the respondents are satisfied, 22.5% of the respondents are highly satisfied,11.3% of the
respondents are dissatisfied, 10% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.17
48
TABLE NO -2.3.18
Frequencies
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 32.5% of the respondents are satisfied, 23.8%
of the respondents are highly satisfied, 22.5% of the respondents are neutral, 12.5% of the
respondents are dissatisfied, 8.8% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.18
49
TABLE NO -2.3.19
Frequencies
Valid Statistics
Frequency Percent Percent
Q15.5 Overall Appraisal
Valid Highly Satisfied 17 21.3 21.3
N Valid 80
Satisfied 22 27.5 27.5
Missing 0
Neutral 25 31.3 31.3
Mean 2.59
Dissatisfied 9 11.3 11.3
Median 3.00
Highly 7 8.8 8.8
Mode 3
Dissatisfied
Std. Deviation 1.198
Total 80 100.0 100.0
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 31.3% of the respondents are neutral, 27.5% of
the respondents are satisfied, 21.3% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 11.3% of the
respondents are dissatisfied, 8.8% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.19
50
TABLE NO -2.3.20
Frequencies
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 31.3% of the respondents are neutral, 27.5% of
the respondents are satisfied, 21.3% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 11.3% of the
respondents are dissatisfied, 8.8% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.20
51
TABLE NO -2.3.21
Frequencies
Valid Statistics
Frequency Percent Percent
Q16.2 Technical Properties
Valid Highly Satisfied 19 23.8 23.8
N Valid 80
Satisfied 26 32.5 32.5
Missing 0
Neutral 18 22.5 22.5
Mean 2.50
Dissatisfied 10 12.5 12.5
Median 2.00
Highly 7 8.8 8.8
Mode 2
Dissatisfied
Std. Deviation 1.232
Total 80 100.0 100.0
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 32.5% of the respondents are satisfied, 23.8%
of the respondents are highly satisfied, 22.5% of the respondents are neutral, 12.5% of the
respondents are dissatisfied, 8.8% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.21
52
TABLE NO -2.3.22
Frequencies
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 30% of the respondents are neutral, 26.3% of
the respondents are satisfied, 22.5% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 11.3% of the
respondents are dissatisfied, 10% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.22
53
TABLE NO -2.3.23
Frequencies
Statistics
Valid
Frequency Percent Percent Q16.4 Economic Life-time
Valid Highly Satisfied 17 21.3 21.3 N Valid 80
Satisfied 19 23.8 23.8 Missing 0
Neutral 23 28.7 28.7 Mean 2.71
Dissatisfied 12 15.0 15.0 Median 3.00
Highly 9 11.3 11.3 Mode 3
Dissatisfied
Std. Deviation 1.275
Total 80 100.0 100.0
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 28.7% of the respondents are neutral. 23.8% of
the respondents are satisfied, 21.3% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 15% of the respondents
are dissatisfied, 11.3% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.23
54
TABLE NO -2.3.24
Frequencies
Statistics
Valid
Frequency Percent Percent Q16.4 Economic Life-time
Valid Highly Satisfied 12 15.0 16.3 N Valid 80
Satisfied 18 22.5 22.5 Missing 0
Neutral 28 35.0 35.0 Mean 2.86
Dissatisfied 13 16.3 15.0 Median 3.00
Highly 9 11.3 11.3 Mode 3
Dissatisfied
Std. Deviation 1.199
Total 80 100.0 100.0
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 35% of the respondents are neutral, 22.5% of
the respondents are satisfied, 16.3% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 15% of the respondents
are dissatisfied, 11.3% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.24
55
TABLE NO -2.3.25
Frequencies
Statistics
Valid
Frequency Percent Percent Q16.6 Overall Appraisal
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 28.7% of the respondents are neutral, 23.8% of
the respondents are satisfied, 18.8% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 15% of the respondents
are dissatisfied, 13.8% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.25
56
TABLE NO -2.3.26
Frequencies
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 32.5% of the respondents are satisfied, 23.8%
of the respondents are highly satisfied, 22.5% of the respondents are neutral, 12.5% of the
respondents are dissatisfied, 8.8% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.26
57
TABLE NO -2.3.27
Frequencies
Valid Statistics
Frequency Percent Percent
Q17.2 Handling of
Valid Highly Satisfied 15 18.8 18.8 Complaint
Satisfied 19 23.8 23.8 N Valid 80
Neutral 23 28.7 28.7 Missing 0
Dissatisfied 12 15.0 15.0 Mean 2.81
Highly 11 13.8 13.8 Median 3.00
Dissatisfied
Mode 3
Total 80 100.0 100.0
Std. Deviation 1.294
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 28.7% of the respondents are neutral, 23.8% of
the respondents are satisfied, 18.8% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 15% of the respondents
are dissatisfied, 13.8% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.27
58
TABLE NO -2.3.28
Frequencies
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 35% of the respondents are neutral, 22.5% of
the respondents are satisfied, 15% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 16.3% of the respondents
are dissatisfied, 11.3% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.28
59
TABLE NO -2.3.29
Frequencies
Valid Statistics
Frequency Percent Percent
Q17.4 Staff‘s Knowledge
Valid Highly Satisfied 17 21.3 21.3
N Valid 80
Satisfied 22 27.5 27.5
Missing 0
Neutral 25 31.3 31.3
Mean 2.59
Dissatisfied 9 11.3 11.3
Median 3.00
Highly 7 8.8 8.8
Dissatisfied Mode 3
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 31.3% of the respondents are neutral, 27.5% of
the respondents are satisfied, 21.3% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 11.3% of the
respondents are dissatisfied, 8.8% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.29
60
TABLE NO -2.3.30
Frequencies
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 28.7% of the respondents are neutral, 23.8% of
the respondents are satisfied, 21.3% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 15% of the respondents
are dissatisfied, 11.3% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO -2.3.30
61
TABLE NO -2.3.31
Frequencies
Valid Statistics
Frequency Percent Percent
Q17.6 Overall Appraisal
Valid Highly Satisfied 18 22.5 22.5
N Valid 80
Missing 0
Satisfied 21 26.3 26.3
Mean 2.60
Neutral 24 30.0 30.0
Median 3.00
Dissatisfied 9 11.3 11.3
Mode 3
Highly 8 10.0 10.0
Std. Deviation 1.239
Dissatisfied
Interpretation:
From the table above table, it is inferred that 30% of the respondents are neutral, 26.3% of
the respondents are satisfied, 22.5% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 11.3% of the
respondents are dissatisfied, 10% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied.
CHART NO 17.6
62
Crosstabs
Cases
Q17.5 Customer
Service
31 to 40 Count 6 6 7
years
Expected 5.9 6.7 8.0
Count
41 to 50 Count 3 3 3
years
Expected 3.2 3.6 4.3
Count
Above 50 Count 2 3 3
years
Expected 2.3 2.6 3.2
Count
Total Count 17 19 23
63
Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance
Value Df (2-sided)
N of Valid Cases 80
Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
Standard Approximate Approximate
Value Errora Tb Significance
N of Valid Cases 80
64
CHAPTER-III
65
3.1-FINDINGS
66
3.2- SUGGESTIONS
67
3.3 – CONCLUSIONS
The study was conducted to find the study out the customer satisfaction with special
reference to R cube electric product. The main objectives of the study is maintained good
relationship between R cube electric product the customers provided time delivery and staff
knowledge. The various stragies that influencing customer satisfaction.
68
3.4 QUESTIONNARIE
1. Name: __________________________________
2. Name of the company: ___________________________________
3. What gender do you identify as?
(a) Male (b) female
4. What is your age?
(a) 23to 30 years (b) 31 to 40 years (c) 41 to 50 years (e) Above 50 years
5. What best describes your marital status?
(a) Married (b) Unmarried
6. What is your educational qualification?
(d) under graduate (e) Post graduate
7. Do you know about R cube service?
(a) Yes (b) No
8. How did you know about R cube electric product?
(a) Advertisement (b) Dealers (c) friends (d) Retailer (e) Others
9. How long have you used R cube product?
(a) 1-6 months (b) 1-year (c) 2-years (d) 3- years or more (e) 4- years or more
10. Will you use or purchase our product again?
(a) Definitely (b) probably (c) Might or Not might (d) Never used
11. When you contracted our customer service team were all issues resolved to your complete
satisfaction?
(a)Yes, by the company its representatives
(b)Yes, by me or someone outside the company
(c)No, the problem was not resolved
(d)No problems no contact with customer service
12. How well does R cube service meet your needs?
(a) Extremely well (b) Very well (c) Somewhat well (d) Not well at all
13. How likely you to repurchase the service of R cube company?
(a)Extremely likely (b) Very likely (c) Something likely (d) Not so likely
(e) Not at all likely
14. Based on your experience with R cube service would you recommend this to other firm or
individual?
(a) Definitely will (b) Probably will (C) Might or Might not
(d) Probably will not (e) Definitely will not
15. Would you recommend our product and service to other people?
(a) Definitely (b) Probably (C) Not sure (d) Probably not (e) Definitely not
70
3.5 – BIBLIOGRAPHY
WEBSITES
1. www.leam marketing.com
71