Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Life Insurance
Life Insurance
Life Insurance
LIFE INSURANCE
IRDA plans to cap surrender charges; negative for margins, volumes
Since October 2009, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has May 27, 2010
focused on rationalising charges, bringing broader uniformity in product features and
improving disclosures. After capping charges, fixing minimum policy terms and making
it compulsory to offer sum assured on products, IRDA now proposes to cap surrender
charges at 15% of fund value for 10-year policies and 12.5% for >10-year policies, Vivek Verma
declining to 0% in a stepped manner by the sixth policy year - lower than the +91-22-4040 7576
existing levels. As per our interpretation, these guidelines will apply to new business vivek.verma@edelcap.com
only (including the existing products, but not the existing in-force business).
Nilesh Parikh
+91-22-4063 5470
Our view: Current reported margins and volumes unsustainable nilesh.parikh@edelcap.com
In the ULIP business, since investment risk is borne by policyholders,
manufacturers were exposed only to persistency and operating risks. With higher Kunal Shah
surrender charges, a significant proportion of persistency risk was passed on to +91-22-4040 7579
policyholders. However, a cap on surrender charges will imply higher persistency Kunal.shah@edelcap.com
risk on life insurers’ balance sheet. We believe the impact will be felt on both
volumes and margins, as illustrated below:
• The biggest risk comes from the policyholder behaviour in response to drop in
surrender charges; due to lower penalty, persistency across sector may
drop, hitting margins adversely.
• Our analysis reveals that in products where life insurers have managed to
garner margins without surrender charges, they have done so by increasing
policy administration charges. However, with growing public clatter on high
allocation charges being used to pay commissions, it will be difficult to
frontload products. At the same time, if insurers sell only frontloaded
products, there will be a limit on choice offered to prospective policyholders.
Further, high frontloading may not fit into SEBI’s scheme of things. Hence,
impact on margins appears inevitable.
Edelweiss Research is also available on www.edelresearch.com,, Bloomberg EDEL <GO>, Thomson First Call, Reuters and Factset. Edelweiss Securities Limited
BFSI
Appendix I
Most products have surrender charges higher than the limit proposed by IRDA
Policy duration ICICI Pru SBI Reliance HDFC Std Kotak OM Birla SL Bajaj Allianz Max NYL
Year <10 years >10 years % of FV % of FV % of FV % of FV % of FV % of FYP % of FYP % of FYP
1 12.5 15 0-70 15-20 95-100 20-100 40-100 0-50 40
2 10 12.5 0-70 10-15 50 15-80 40-100 0-50 15-40
3 7.5 10 0-70 7.5-10 30-35 10-70 40-100 0-50 10-30
4 5 7.5 0-10 2-5 20 15 4-10 2-50 0-47 5-20
5 2.5 5 0-5 0-5 10 0-15 2-5 0-40 0-26 2.5-10
6 - 2.5 - 0-3 - - 0-2.5 0-10 - -
7th year
- - - - - - - 0-10 -
onwards
Source: IRDA, Company, Edelweiss research
Note: FV stands for fund value; FYP for First Year Premium
Appendix II
Companies can manage margins even without surrender charges by tweaking other charges (example enlisted
below of two products of ICICI Pru)
ACE Assure wealth
Premium allocation charges 0% Yr 1: 100%; Yr 2-5: 4%; Yr 6-7: 0-4%; Yr
8 onwards: 0%
Policy admin charges INR 60 p.m. Yr 2 onwards: INR 60 p.m.
FMC 0.75-1.35% 0.75-1.35%
Surrender value Yr1-3: 70%; Yr 4: 10%; Yr 5: 5%, Yr 6 No surrender charges
onwards: 0%
Remarks Zero premium allocation charge balanced Surrender charges are zero but recovery
by higher surrender charge done through 100% policy admin charges
in Year 1
Appendix III
As per our understanding, these regulations do not apply to existing business, hence, insurers will be able to
realise profits out of Funds for Future Appropriations (FFA) amassed over years
6,400 2.8
(INR mn)
4,800 2.1
(%)
3,200 1.4
1,600 0.7
0 0.0
Reliance
Bajaj
Birla
ICICI
Kotak
SBI
HDFC
Max
Reliance
Bajaj
Birla
ICICI
Kotak
SBI
HDFC
Max
FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
Source: IRDA, Company, Edelweiss research
Note: FFA (includes traditional and linked) implies the penalty to be obtained by insurer on premature surrenders; to be realized in P&L post
the revival period
16.0
12.0
(%)
8.0
4.0
0.0
ICICI
Reliance
SBI
Bajaj
Kotak
HDFC
LIC
Max
Appendix IV
Key recommendations of Exposure Draft on Standardisation of Terms and Conditions of ULIPs and measure for
Policyholders’ Protection Regulations
Parameter Recommendation
Grace Period Payment mode:
monthly 15 days
others 30 days
Lapsation Options to policyholders in case of lapsation:
a) revive
b) continue to extent of risk cover
c) continue risk cover and as a part of fund (default option)
d) withdrawal
if no fund option is selected by policyholder:
Lapsed fund to be invested in fixed income fund earning atleast savings
deposit rate
Interest on lapsed funds not available to shareholder
Minimum revival period 5 years
FMC
Risk charges
Proceeds to be refunded:
Not before three policy years
Compuslorily after the revival period
Disclosures Following to be shown as separate item in balance sheet:
Appendix V
History:
Action Details Impact
Term Overall cap FMC capped Profitability capped
Oct-09 IRDA caps difference <= 10 years 300bps <=135bps Downward pressure on commissions
between gross and net Focus on improving persistency and
>10 years 225bps efficient cost management
yield on ULIP policies
Mortality charges, cost of guarantees kept out To maintain margins, new products
of the ambit carried:
Higher sum assured
Guarantees
No surrender charges allowed beyond 5th Freedom to fix surrender charges still
policy year allowed insurers to reduce persistency
No limit imposed by IRDA on surrender risk on their balance sheet during first
charges five policy years
Apr-10 Disclose commissions to As per media reports, IRDA has asked insurers To exhert downward pressure on
agents to disclose explicitly the commission in the (effective) distributor commissions
benefit illustration
May-10 Minimum policy term Individual policies to be of 5 year duration Renders regulator imposed long-term
fixed Group business to be on annually renewable nature to insurance contract; life
basis insurers cannot cater to demand for
short-term policies
Reduces persistency risk
No partial withdrawals in ULIPs during first five Makes product inflexible, hard to sell
policy years
No partial benefits on pension/annuity plans on
linked platform
At time of maturity and surrender 1/3rd value
can be commuted, rest need to be annuitised
in linked pension plans
Insurers to offer All pension/annuity plans to carry sum assured Restricts sale of pure savings/investment
guarantees on policy Top-ups to carry cover; to be treated as single products under umbrella of life insurance
benefits premium contract
No loans to be granted
on ULIPs
IRDA recommends Refer Appendix IV on details on caps on Since the caps recommended by IRDA
capping surrender surrender charges appear to be below what insurers are
charges on ULIPS charging currently, so a significant
persistency risk will now be borne by
insurer, even in first five policy years,
jeopardizing margins
Source: IRDA, media reports, Edelweiss research
1,400
Date Company Title Price (INR) Recos
Rating Distribution* 101 56 9 169 Buy appreciate more than 15% over a 12-month period
Copyright 2009 Edelweiss Research (Edelweiss Securities Ltd). All rights reserved
Edelweiss
8 ResearchSecurities
Edelweiss is also available on www.edelresearch.com ,Bloomberg EDEL <GO>, Thomson First Call, Reuters and Factset.
Limited Edelweiss Securities Limited