Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Legal Methods PDF
Legal Methods PDF
of
Legal Methods
for
Semester I
Compiled By :
Ankit Srivastava
Course Teacher
Table of Contents
3. Syllabus
4. Teaching Plan
5. Reference Material
6. List of Assignments/Projects
7. Important Instructions
1. Preface/Outline of the Subject
This subject has its relevance in acquainting the law students with the method adopted by
law in realizing its objective. Especially for a first year law student it becomes essential to
firstly understand the context within which legal subjects are to be understood. In such a
scenario there are a number of fundamental questions that arise in the naïve mind of a first
year student. For instance one fundamental question that arises concerns with the aspect of
whether there is anything unique about the functioning of law. In particular this goes on to
raise following number of questions- Is it different to argue legally than to argue in
different contexts? If the answer to this question is yes, then does it mean that there is a
particular form of reasoning that is followed while arguing legally? If the answer to this
question is yes, then are we to assume that as a matter of generality whenever there is
Legality the method so used to operationalize law is going to be same and thereby can there
be different Systems of Law? Lastly, a question arises with respect to the craft of Legal
Writing.
In the course of Legal Methods so prepared all these questions so raised would be pondered
over in detail. It is for this purpose that the entire course curriculum has been structured in a
matter of seven modules. Each module has a specific purpose of bringing about a new
perspective on the aspect of legal functioning. For instance, where on the one hand the
module on legal systems provides for an answer to the concern of generality and
particularity of legal methods, on the other hand, the module on legal reasoning analyzes
the possibility of formally defining the relation between a legal premise and legal
conclusion.
Therefore, the main structure has been designed so as to enable students to scrutinize and
critically evaluate the method so employed by the legal systems. The overarching aim is to
impart a new perspective to the young students to enhance their knowledge on legal
mechanism itself.
Origin of Common Law, Custom and Unwritten Laws, Judgment Based evolution of
Common Laws.- Judge and Jury based Distinction, Procedures and Writs, Dual Court
System, Precedents in Common Law, Adversarial System
Civil Law System
Indian Legal System and Hierarchy of Courts: Orignal Jurisdiction of Supreme Court,
Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court, Writ Jurisdiction of High Court, Hierarchy of
Courts in Criminial Law, Hierarchy of Courts in Civil Law, Tribunals
Jurisdiction and its Types: Pecuniary Jurisdiction, Subject Matter Jurisdiction,
Territorial Jurisdiction, Original Jurisdiction; Appeallate Jurisdiction, Legal
Authority: Binding and Persuasive Authority, Subject Dependent and Subject
Independent Authority, Permissive and Non Permissive Authority, Precedent.
Precedents and Stare Decisis: Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dictum, Obiter Dictum and
Hypothetical Facts, Vertical and Horizontal Precedents
Reasoning of judgment
Material Facts and General Facts- Various case examples such as Donoghue vs
Stevenson and Grant vs Australia,
Tests for Determining Ratio Decidendi: Eugine Wambaugh’s Notion of Inversion
Test, Goodhart Test, Julius Stone Challenge to Goodhart Test.
Deductive Reasoning
Inductive Reasoning
Abductive Reasoning
Legal Reasoning: Rule Based Reasoning, Pragmatic Reasoning versus Traditional
Form of Formal Reasoning, Incompleteness of a rule, Interpretation.
5.1 Module I
1. Sir Frederick Pollock, The Expansion of the Common Law, pp. 53-80.
2. Sir Frederick Pollock and Frederic William Maitland, The History of English Law
Before the Time of Edward I, ( Liberty Fund, Inc.
3. Stephen N. Subrin, How Equity Conquered Common Law: Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure in Historical Perspective, University of Pennsylvania Law Report, Vol.
135:909.
4. Gerald J. Postema, Classical Common Law Jurisprudence (Part I and Part II), Oxford
University Commonwealth University.
5. David J Bederman, Custom as a Source of Law, Cambridge University Press.(2010),
Chapter 3.
5.2 Module II
1. Arthur L. Goodhart, Determining the Ratio Decidendi of a Case, Yale Law Journal,
vol.40.
2. Eugene Wambaugh, The Study of Cases, Boston Brown and Company.
3. Neil Duxbury, The Nature and Authority of Precedent, Cambridge University Press,
2008. Chapter 3.
4. Julius Stone, The Ratio of the Ratio Decidendi, The Modern Law Review, Vol. 22,
pp. 597-620, 1959.
Case Laws-
1. Vern R. Walker, Discovering the Logic of Legal Reasoning, Hofstra Law Review,
Vol. 35:1687.
2. Scott Brewer, Exemplary Reasoning: Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Rational Force
of Legal Argument by Analogy, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 109, pp. 923-1028, 1996.
3. John R Josephson and Susan G. Josephson, Abductive Inference: Computation,
Philosophy and Technology, Cambridge University Press 1996.
4. Frederick Schauer, Thinking Like A Lawyer, Harvard University Press 2009.Chapter
1, Chapter 2 and Chapter 5.
5. Larry Alexander and Emily Sherwin, Demystifying Legal Reasoning , Cambridge
University Press, 2008. Chapter 2.
6. Enrico Francesconi, A learning Approach for Knowledge Acquisition in the Legal
Domain, in “Approaches to Legal Ontologies: Theories, Domains, Methodologies.”
Springer.
7. Chandra Chakraborty, Logic, PHI Learning Private Ltd, New Delhi, 2nd Edition,
2007. Chapter 2 and Chapter 3.
5.4 Module IV
Research Methodology
The student should submit the research methodology for approval at the time of consultation
which should include the following:
Research Problem
Literature Review
Objectives of the research
Research Questions
Scope and Limitation
Research Methodology
Course Teacher/Teachers