Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sacred Cows of English
Sacred Cows of English
Sacred Cows of English
The fact that English becomes a global language has challenged the way linguistics
had exposed five types of traditional ideas of English, as known as Sacred cows (Bhatt, 2001,
p.538). There are the acquisitional, sociolinguistic, pedagogical, theoretical, and ideological
countries (Bhatt, 2001, p.539). As in the case of Indian English, speakers do not differ the use
of tag questions, which is a part of their cultural grammar rather than an error in the language
Another problem is that traditional linguistic understanding does not perceive the
structure of the interlanguage as its own but view it from the systematic scope of the target
language (Bhatt, 2001, p.539). This false comparison caused consequences to the fossilisation
theory (Bhatt, 2001, p.539). However, there would be no discussion of this theory without
mentioning the target language's structure and native speakers (Bhatt, 2001, p.539). This
idealisation confirms that only native speakers can achieve the competent use of the target
Theoretical Sacred cow involves the perceptions of the speech community, the native
speaker, and the ideal speaker-hearer (Bhatt, 2001, p.539). Traditional linguistics believe that
p.539). However, most of the case happens in non-native contexts (Bhatt, 2001, p.539). This
idealisation also states that only the homogenous speech community that includes the ideal
speaker-hearer can own the model of a specific language (Bhatt, 2001, p.539).
As a result, this framework of the mother-tongue acquisition generates “linguistic
communism”, which is an impractical idea indicating the equality of all languages. This
idealisation entitles the language of power by excluding other cultures and languages (Bhatt,
2001, p.539). The difference appears to clarify the inner-circle variety despite its probable
unreality.
As in Pedagogical Sacred cow, a two-decade study states that world Englishes are
distinctive for their own localised varieties (Bhatt, 2001, p.540). However, the pedagogical
paradigm excludes this reality and employ the norm in inner-circle contexts for the English
language teaching (Bhatt, 2001, p.540). Bhatt hopes that the study of the fundamental features
in the classroom would contribute to more suitable ESL pedagogical approaches (Bhatt, 2001,
p.540).
localised versions of English as the contract-based languages nationally and regionally (Bhatt,
2001, p.540). As a crucial result, the "pluricentricity" of English explains the canon of
traditional English and forms that of modern English with their cultural, literacy and linguistic
Ideological Sacred cow concerns with the teaching of English that promotes the
standard English and this idealisation competes with the localised varieties for domination
(Bhatt, 2001, p.540-541). As a part of the promotion, the institutional agency persuades the
public to believe the adoption of standard English will benefit them significantly, such as
increased life quality (Bhatt, 2001, p.541). The English language teaching in outer-circle
contexts continues to employ this strategy to maintain and evolve the ideology and status of
standard English (Bhatt, 2001, p.541). However, the ideological landscape is changing as the
localised varieties are fighting for the functional domains over the standard English (Bhatt,
2001, p.541).
Reference