Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fluid Tests22
Fluid Tests22
Fluid Tests22
Engineering College
Preface
Ammar A. Alsuraifi
2017
Basrah
Fluid mechanics laboratory
5. Sample calculations 0T
6. 0T
0T Discuss results; reference all tables and figures; compare Graphs
7. 0T Raw data sheet
0T
Fluid mechanics laboratory
Contents
No. of experiment Title Page
1 Bernoulli´s Theorem Demonstration 1
4 Reynolds number 12
are constant. Therefore the three terms must be interchangeable so that, for example, if in a
horizontal system the velocity head is increased then the pressure head must decrease
That is, we want to demonstrate with these practices that in one given pipe with two sections,
1 and 2, the energy between its sections is constant. The sum of the three previous terms is
constant and so, Bernoulli’ theorem can be shown as:
Apparatus:
1. Bernoulli's apparatus (Figure 1).
2. Hydraulic bench.
Procedure:at
1. Measure the area of conduit at various gauge points.
2. Open the supply valve and adjust the flow
3. Measure the height of water level (above the arbitrarily selected plane) in different piezometric
tubes
4. Measure the discharge of the conduit with the help of GMPXNFUFS
5. Repeat the step (1) to (4) for two more readings.
Fluid mechanics laboratory 2
hT
h6
ho
h5
h4
h3
h2
h1
10,74
12,44
14,46
11,3
25
25
10
10
S0 S1 S2S3 S4 S5 S6
Section S0 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6
Dia.(mm) 25 10 10.8 11.3 12.5 14.5 25
Fluid mechanics laboratory 3
Observation Table
Q(l/h) Section S0 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6
Hi(mm)
HT(mm)
Hi(mm)
HT(mm)
Hi(mm)
HT(mm)
Result Table
Section S0 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6
Q(m3/s)
Area(m2)
V(m/s)
Kinematic head
(v2/2g)(m)
Pressure head (hi)
(P/γ)(m)
Total Theoretical
Energy head
(hi+v2/2g)(m)
Total Actual Energy
head (ht)(m)
V(m/s)
Kinematic head
(v2/2g)(m)
Pressure head (hi)
(P/γ)(m)
Total Theoretical
Energy head
(hi+v2/2g)(m)
Total Actual Energy
head (ht)(m)
V(m/s)
Kinematic head
(v2/2g)(m)
Pressure head (hi)
(P/γ)(m)
Total Theoretical
Energy head
(hi+v2/2g)(m)
Total Actual Energy
head (ht)(m)
Fluid mechanics laboratory 4
Results Ploat
.Draw H.G.L. & Theorotical T.E.L. & Actual T.E.L.along the duct on same paper
Q. Do these total heights match up with the total height measured with the probe
If they are different, what are the reasons?
Questions:at
1. Practically the total head of liquid at a point does not remain constant during the flow,
why?
2. The liquid level in the piezometric tube connected to minimum c/s area is lowest, Why?
3. Why the water levels in the various piezometric tubes are different?
4. State one practical application of bernouli's theorem
5. What is Bernoulli's theorem?
6. What is the head loss between Piezometer 1 & 6
7. what do you mean by piezometric head ?
8. .Why does the pressure measured by the Pitot tube decrease along the pipe
Fluid mechanics laboratory 5
Theory:at
1#Venturi meter
If Bernoulli equation is applied between points 1 (upstream section) and 2 (throat). And
taking into account that the energy loss due to the height difference (z1 - z2) is negligible
Where:
ΔH: level difference of manometric tubes between tap 1 and 3 [m].
As A3 is the transverse area of the vena contracta and it is unknown, the area of the orifice
A2 is used, and the quotient C is added to take into account the difference.
Apparatus:
The accessory consists of a Venturi meter, a variable area meter and an orifice plate,
installed in series to allow a direct comparison as shown in fig.1
Each element includes one pressure tap at the inlet and one pressure tap at the outlet.
The unit consists of different elements used together with the Hydraulic Bench:
Fluid mechanics laboratory 7
Procedure:at
Experimental procedure
.Step 1: Connect the hydraulic bench to the unit and switch on the hydraulic bench
. Step 2: Proceed to fill the manometric tubes
. Step 3: Vary the flow of 5 l/min
Step 4: Take the measurements of the manometric tubes no. 1, 2 and 6,7. for each flow
.Step 5: Switch off the hydraulic bench
From the observation data calculate Q and LogQ & ∆H and Log∆H
arrange the result as in table below
Result Table
Venturi meter Orifice meter
Q(m3/s) Log(Q)
∆H (m) Log(∆H) ∆H (m) Log(∆H)
From this estimate the accurate valyue of Discharge coefficient (Cd) for Venturi meter &
Orifice meter:
Pitot’s tube
The operation with Pitot’s tube is: First of all, we consider a fix obstacle in the moving fluid
The ΔP line finishes in the impact point (P), if we make an orifice in this point P and we link
it with a manometric tube, we are measuring the total pressure.
We can also know the velocity in the pipe, that is:
Where:
V1 = V (Particles velocity), V2 = 0
Apparatus: R
Pitot tube Composed of 8 static holes and total pressure tapping D-2.5 mm. Transparent tube.
32mm internal diameter and 430 mm length approx. Hose connections. Water manometer, 480
mm length Easy and quick coupling system built-in as shown in figure
Results Ploat
Plot the linear relationship between (Qth.) as y-axes & (Qact.) as x-axes for the values at the
pitute tube at pipe center only and discuse the ploat
However, although a straight line is obtained, Qreal≠ Qv , because an experimental factor must
be introduced.
Ploat graph the position of the Pitot tube with the velosity measurement of the Pitot tube and
obtain the different speed profiles in the pipe for the three Q values
Finally, to determine the error it is necessary to take into account that it is defined by the difference between
the actual volume and the volume obtained with the Pitot tube
Questions
Q.1. It is supposed that the error is given by a constant but if the error depends on the volume, when and
why does it happen
Fluid mechanics laboratory 12
Experiment No. 4 Reynolds number
Object:a To determine the type of flow by using Reynold’s Number.
Theory:1 ρ .V.y
Re =
µ
Where :
Re = Reynold’s number ( Dimensionless Parameter ).
V = Average velocity in cm / sec
y = Flow depth in chanel cm.
ρ = Mass density of fluid ( Kg / m3 )
µ = Dynamic viscosity ( N - s / m2 or Kg / m. sec)
The flow can be visualized by passing a streak of dye and observing its motion. In
the laminar, low velocity flow the streak line is only slightly zig – zag. In the turbulent flow,
the dye thoroughly mixes up in the flow. Thus passing through a glass chanel and observing
the velocity at different mixing stages of the dye is the principle on which Reynolds
apparatus is based.
Apparatus: R
1. Hydraulics Bench.
2. Osborne Reynolds Apparatus.
3. Measuring Cylinder (graduated cylinder).
4. Stop Watch.
5. Vegetable Dye.
6. Thermometer.
Re Devise
Fluid mechanics laboratory 13
Procedure:at R
* Dimension of the chanel & temperature was noted down.
* The tank was filled to some height by opening inlet valve and closing control valve.
* Colour dye was filled in dye tank.
* Control valve was open slightly and also the inlet valve such a way that the
water level in the tank remains constant. This happens when in coming
discharge is equal to the out going discharge.
* The discharge was measured.
* The whole procedure is repeated for 3 times.
Discharge Type of
Q l/h Flow
Water vescosity µ = 5
Results
Determine water kinematic viscosity suitable for the measured temperature.
Calculate the flow for each sampling (flow measurement).
Knowing that the Area of the glass chanel and knowing the flow which flows through it,
obtain the fluid velocity value.
With the equation of Re- calculate the Reynolds number for each flow.
Fill in the following table:
Result Table
Fluid mechanics laboratory 14
Results Ploat
Plot the linear relationship between (Q) as y-axes & (Re) as x-axes for the results values
Questions
Q1. How does the Reynolds number change with the flow increase?
Q2. Up to which Reynolds number can a laminar flow be obtained?
Q3. From which Reynolds number range do we obtain a transition flow?
Q4. From which Reynolds number does the turbulent flow appear?
Q5. Do these results have coherence with those obtained by Osborne Reynolds?
1. Reynolds number importance?
2. Describe the Reynolds number experiments to demonstrate the two type of flow?
3. Define laminar flow, transition flow and turbulent flow?
Laminar
Transitional
Turbulent
Theory:1
Rectangular Notch
Sluice gate
The practical estimation of Q below a Sluice gate is
𝑄 = 𝐶. 𝐵. 𝑊. �2𝑔(𝑦1 − 𝑦2 )
Where:
Apparatus: R
1. Hydraulics Bench.
2. Open chanel Apparatus
3. Hydrodynamic models
4. Rectangle proad weir with rounded edges
5. Sharp weir
6. Sluice gate
Procedure:at R
* Place the model in use in the channel using the setscrews supplied. The model will be
placed in the appropriate hole in the lower part of the channel
Observation Table
Sharp weir Broad weir Sluice gate
Q(l/h)
H (mm) H (mm) y1 (mm) y2 (mm)
From the observation data calculate Q & LogQ & H & LogH & ∆y and Log∆y
arrange the result as in table below
Result Table
2
𝑄𝑤 = 𝐶𝑑. . 𝐵. �2𝑔. (𝐻)1.5 → 𝑄𝑤 = 𝐾. (𝐻)1.5 → log(𝑄) = 𝐿𝑜𝑔(𝐾) + 1.5log(𝐻)
3
For Sluice gate:
𝑄𝑠 = 𝐶𝑑. 𝐵. 𝑤. �2𝑔. (∆𝑦)0.5 → 𝑄𝑠 = 𝐾. (∆𝑦)0.5 → log(𝑄) = 𝐿𝑜𝑔(𝐾) + 0.5log(∆𝑦)
Results Ploat
Plot the linear relationship between Log(Q) as y-axes & Log(H) for the two weirs type.
And plot the linear relationship between Log(Q) as y-axes log(∆y) as x-axes for the sluice
gate and then estimate K from intersection value with y-axes for each model.
Intersection = Log(K)
𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒:
2
𝐾 = 𝐶𝑑. . 𝐵. �2𝑔. for the weirs
3
𝐾 = 𝐶𝑑. 𝐵. 𝑊. �2𝑔. for the sluice gate
From this estimate the accurate value of Discharge coefficient (Cd) for Sharp weir, Broad
weir and Sluice gate :
where Y is the weir height and H the height measured over the channel.
Does the Rehbock’s formula coincide with the values obtained experimentally?
Q.2 Do the flows experimentally calculated, taking the weir and Cw as flowmeter, coincide
with the flows given by the Hydraulic Bench or Group? If there are any difference, which
could be the reason?
Q.3 As happened with the thin-wall weirs, it is more correct to use a formula where we have
introduced a weir coefficient. The theoretical coefficient would be:1
and the formula recommended:
From the values measured of the weir upstream height and of the weir height, check the
value of the coefficient.
Q.4 Calculate the flow, taking the weir as flowmeter.
For the measures of the heights upstream taken, check that the flows obtained by using the
latter formula and those obtained directly by the Hydraulic Bench or Group: are equal? if
they aren’t, which could be the reason of this difference?
1. Differentiate between :-
•Uniform and non uniform flow
•Steady and unsteady flow
2. Define notch?
3. What is coefficient of discharge?
Fluid mechanics laboratory 19
Furthermore, for a circular pipe flowing full, the head loss due to friction may be calculated from
the formula:
where L is the length of the pipe between tappings, d is the internal diameter of the pipe, u is the
mean velocity of water through the pipe in m/s, g is the acceleration due to gravity in m/s2 and f is
pipe friction coefficient.
The Reynolds' number, Re, can be found using the following equation:
For the gate valve experiment, pressure difference before and after the gate is measured directly
using a pressure gauge. This can then be converted to an equivalent head loss using the equation :
1 bar = 10.2 m water
The loss coefficient may then be calculated as above for the gate valve.
Apparatus: R
1. Fluid friction apparatus.
2. Hydraulics bench to supply water to the fluid friction apparatus
3. Energy losses in bends and fittings apparatus (Figure 1).
4.1Clamps for pressure tapping connection tubes.
Procedure:at R
Measure & records all the pipes and fittings data Measure the internal diameter of each test pipe
Prime the pipe network with water. Open and close the appropriate valves to obtain flow of
water through the required test pipe.
Measure flow rates using the Rotameter. Measure head loss between the required
tappings using the pressure gages
• Take readings at several different flow rates, altering the flow using the control valve on the
hydraulics bench
• Obtain readings on all test pipes and fittings
Long bend.
Area enlargement.
Area contraction.
Elbow bend.
Short bend.
Valve fitting.
Mitre bend.
Fluid mechanics laboratory 21
Q(l/h)
Fitting Type.
P1(bar) P2(bar) P1(bar) P2(bar) P1(bar) P2(bar)
From the observation data calculate V , Re, f, hL & ∆P and actual losses hL arrange
the result as in tables below
Fluid mechanics laboratory 22
Result Tables
Confirm that the head loss can be predicted using the pipe friction equation provided the
velocity of the fluid and the pipe dimensions are known.
Results Ploat
1. Plot a graph of h versus u for each size of pipe. Identify the laminar, transition and turbulent
zones on the graphs.
2. Confirm that the graph is a straight line for the zone of laminar flow h α u .
3. Plot a graph of pipe friction coefficient versus Reynolds' number (log scale).
Fluid mechanics laboratory 23
Questions
1. Compare the values of head loss determined by calculation with those measured using the
manometer.
2. Define hydraulic gradient and total energy lines?
3. Define eddy loss?
4. Define friction factor in the pipe?
5. Define major loss in pipe?
6. Define equilent pipe?
SPECIFICATIONS
This unit allows the detailed study of fluid friction pressure losses, which occur when a non-compressible fluid flows through pipes, valves, pipe
fittings and flow metering devices.
Anodized aluminum structure with panel of painted steel. Main metallic elements made of stainless steel.
Diagram in the front panel with similar distribution to the elements in the real unit.
5 Pipes of different diameter, material and roughness:
Rough pipe (PVC): external diameter: 25mm. and internal diameter: 17mm.
Rough pipe (PVC): external diameter: 32mm. and internal diameter: 23mm.
Smooth pipe (PMMA): external diameter: 10mm. and internal diameter: 6.5mm.
Smooth pipe (PVC): external diameter: 20mm. and internal diameter: 16.5mm.
Smooth pipe (PVC): external diameter: 32mm. and internal diameter: 26.5mm.
Types of valves:
Angle-seat valve: internal diameter: 20mm.
Gate valve: internal diameter: 20mm.
Diaphragm valve: internal diameter: 20mm.
Ball valve: internal diameter: 20mm.
Types of couplings:
In-line strainer, internal diameter: 20mm.
Sudden widening. Its section changes from 25mm to 40mm.
Sudden contraction. Its section changes from 40mm to 25mm.
90º elbow: inner diameter: 20mm.
“T” junction: inner diameter: 20mm.
45º elbow: inner diameter: 20mm.
45º “T” junction: inner diameter: 20mm.
Symmetrical “Y” branch: inner diameter of each pipe: 20 mm.
Double 90º elbow: inner diameter: 20mm.
Special couplings (methacrylate):
Pitot tube: length:30mm., external diameter:4mm and internal diameter: 2.5mm.
Venturi tube: length: 180mm. , larger section: 32mm. and smaller section: 20mm.
Diaphragm with measuring plate: larger diameter: 25mm. and smaller diameter: 20mm.
24
EXERCISES AND PRACTICAL POSSIBILITIES
1.-Determination of pressure loss due to friction in a rough pipe with 29.- Determination of pressure loss in a gradual widening.
an internal diameter of 17mm.
30.- Determination of pressure loss in a diaphragm.
2.- Determination of pressure loss due to friction in a rough pipe with
an internal diameter of 23mm. 31.- Comparison of pressure loss in the different fittings.
3.- Determination of pressure loss due to friction in a smooth pipe 32.- Measurement of the flow with the Venturi tube.
with an internal diameter of 6.5mm.
33.- Determination of the discharge coefficient, Cd, in the Venturi
4.- Determination of pressure loss due to friction in a smooth pipe tube.
with an internal diameter of 16.5mm.
34.- Measurement of the flow with the Pitot tube.
5.- Determination of pressure loss due to friction in a smooth pipe
with an internal diameter of 26.5mm. 35.- Determination of the discharge coefficient, Cd, in the Pitot tube.
6.- Study of the influence of the diameter in the pressure loss due to 36.- Comparison between the flow measured in the Venturi and Pitot
friction in rough pipes. tubes.
7.- Study of the influence of the diameter in the pressure loss due to Additional practical possibilities:
friction in smooth pipes.
37.- Study of the relationship between pressure losses due to fluid
8.- Study of the influence of the roughness in the pressure loss. friction and the water flow rate.
9.- Determination of the friction coefficient in a rough pipe with an 38.- Determining the relationship between the pipe friction
internal diameter of 17 mm. coefficients and Reynolds number for flow through a pipe with
roughened bore.
10.- Determination of the friction coefficient in a rough pipe with an
internal diameter of 23 mm. 39.- Determining of the resistance coefficients for bends,
enlargements and contractions.
11.- Determination of the friction coefficient in a smooth pipe with an
internal diameter of 6.5 mm. 40.- Determining of characteristic curves of valves and fittings.