College of Education

The Wolf Man Case Study of Sigmund Frued: Reaction Paper

From the History of an Infantile Neurosis, the contextual investigation of Sergei

Konstantinovitch Pankejeff, "the Wolf Man", is a record of a total examination from first

conclusion to fix and was planned by its creator to show the legitimacy of psychoanalytic

hypothesis and the accomplishment of its strategy. The Wolf Man was a well off Russian blue -

blood, twenty-three years of age when he previously showed up at Freud's counseling rooms in

1910. He portrays to Freud an adolescence plagued by bad dreams and phobic responses in which

wolves show up as the predominant picture. From his eighteenth year, when he had been put on

an especially forceful treatment for gonorrhea, his life had gotten unmanageable, and from that

point on he is hounded by a versatile symptomatology that incorporates incessant obstruction and

over the top reasoning. Having just traversed Europe looking for a fix, the Wolf Man is at long last

treated by Freud from February 1910 to July 1914 and on a subsequent event to manage "a bit of

transference which had not up to this point been survived" (Freud 1918, p.122) from November

1919 until February 1920. Ascribing his enduring to a "butt-centric obsession", psychoanalytic

mediation, as indicated by Freud, reduced a great part of the Wolf Man's anguish and on its

decision his patient "felt typical a carried on unexceptionally". In spite of this affirmation, the way

that the Wolf Man required further investigation by Freud's student Ruth Mack Brunswick and

uncovers in his diaries that he depended on standard systematic meetings into at any rate his eighty-

second year, vouches for another less liberal perspective on his treatment. Therapy, it shows up,

would never totally evacuate the Wolf Man's symptomatology.

 In spite of being overwhelmingly drawn together, the Wolf Man's investigation with Freud

is portrayed by opposition and misrecognition. As a critical book throughout the entire existence

of analysis its irresolution has been a wellspring of disquiet for Freud and his adherents. It has

therefore gotten a locus of significant basic work, with psychoanalytic reevaluations on one side

attempting to fix or deny the tricky investigation, and increasingly aggressive pundits on the other

utilizing it as a concentration to assault the Freudian model.1 Perhaps the most intriguing and

significant of ongoing reactions to the case is Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok's The Wolf Man's

Magic Word. Contemplating the immense collection of writing that has developed around the Wolf

Man, Abraham and Torok don't consider his to be to Freudian treatment as essentially a

disappointment of psychoanalytic strategy, yet rather they change his hesitance into the very pith

of his being.

Freud's examination of the Wolf Man was famously dangerous, with this most celebrated

patient opposing psychoanalytic translation and requiring consideration from its specialists for the

term of his long life. The contextual investigation, distributed in 1918, brings into its circle the

stories of a masochist character and a withering class of Russian nobility, alongside key

hypothetical affirmations and political posing (in regards to the dissention of previous partners)

with respect to Freud. What the creator situates in Freud's content and the Wolf Man's later diaries

and meetings is an exclusionary mentality, in both hypothesis and individual reflections, to the

exceptionally emotional powers of world history that were to considerably affect the lives of

examiner and analysand. Utilizing the related ideas of joining and the sepulcher created in Nicolas

Abraham and Maria Torok's content The Wolf Man's Magic Word, the creator remakes this

rejection as both generative and problematic of the Wolf Man's commitment with, reliance on and
protection from therapy. Recognizing a trading off and hushed dynamic with respect to the Russian

Revolution followed into the Wolf Man's divided and dubious character, the creator utilizes proof

of a hopeless subject situation to advise a progressively mysterious comprehension regarding the

frequently peculiar mentalities, conduct and language showed by Freud's patient. More than giving

a response to the Wolf Man's pathology, this proposes rather a reconsidering of the case as a tricky,

puzzling and beautiful work of emblematic intervention to which a comparatively open and

numerous understanding is the main fitting interpretative reaction.