Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Urban Buildings System Summary: Circular Economy in Cities
Urban Buildings System Summary: Circular Economy in Cities
SUMMARY
CIRCULAR
ECONOMY
IN CITIES
URBAN BUILDINGS
SYSTEM SUMMARY
SUMMARY
$650bn
49%
9% 60%
One-third of urban By 2025, 1 billion 49% owner- 60% of European 9 out of 10
residents struggle new homes occupied homes office space is existing buildings
to secure decent are needed in the UK are unused during in the EU will
housing3 worldwide ‘under-occupied’ working hours6 still be in use in
costing an (at least two and in India 15% 20508
estimated USD bedrooms more of office space is
650 billion per than stated reported vacant7
year, or USD 9–11 need)5
trillion overall4
21%
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
ENDNOTES
1 McKinsey, Urban world: cities and the rise of 12 UN Environment, Global status report 2017:
the consuming class (2012) p. 35 towards a zero-emission, efficient, and resilient
buildings and construction sector (2017) p. 14;
2 UN Habitat, Urbanization and International Resource Panel, The weight of
development: emerging futures cities (2018)
world cities report (2016) p. 47
13 Stockholm Resilience Centre, Planetary
3 McKinsey, Tackling the world’s affordable boundaries framework
housing challenge (October 2014)
14 C. Montgomery, Tackling the crisis of social
4 UN Habitat, Urbanization and disconnection, Happy City (1 July 2017),
development: emerging futures Happy City, Walkability
world cities report (2016) p. 47
15 Arup, Cities alive: green Building Envelope
5 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, SUN, and (2013) p. 13
McKinsey Center for Business and
Environment, Growth Within: a circular 16 Circle Economy, .Fabric, TNO, Gemeente
economy vision for a competitive Europe Amsterdam, Circular Amsterdam: a vision and
(2015) p. 83 action agenda for the city and metropolitan
area (2016) pp. 4, 40
6 Ibid.
17 London Waste and Recycling Board, Towards a
7 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Circular economy circular economy – context and opportunities
in India: rethinking growth for long-term pros- (2015) p. 22
perity (2016) p. 34
18 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, SUN, and
8 Renovate Europe, Multiple benefits of McKinsey Center for Business and Environ-
renovating, renovate-europe.eu ment, Growth Within: a circular economy vision
9 OECD, Working party on resource for a competitive Europe (2015) p. 85
productivity and waste: a policy study 19 European Parliament, Boosting building
on the sustainable use of construction renovation: what potential and value for
materials (2015) p. 4 Europe? (2016) pp. 21, 51,
10 World Bank, What a waste: a global review of Renovate Europe, Multiple Benefits of
solid waste management (2012) p. 16 Renovating, renovate-europe.eu
11 OECD Better Life Index, Housing 20 London Waste and Recycling Board, Towards a
circular economy – context and opportunities
(2015) p. 22
DISCLAIMER
This document has been produced by a team from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Arup provided expert input. The Ellen MacArthur
Foundation makes no representations and provides no warranties in relation to any aspect of the document, including regarding the
advisability of investing in any particular company or investment fund or other vehicle. Whilst care and attention has been exercised in the
preparation of the document and its analyses, relying on data and information believed to be reliable, neither the Foundation nor any of its
employees or appointees shall be liable for any claims or losses of any nature in connection with information contained in this document
including, but not limited to, lost profits or punitive or consequential damages.
PLANNING
PLANNING
How a city’s buildings are planned and developed has a significant impact
on urban living conditions and on resource consumption. The physical
structure of a city is fundamental to how a city functions. Urban planning in a
city includes making decisions on the placement of buildings, their use, and
urban density. Planning for compact, connected cities can ensure that land is
used effectively and support the looping of local material flows while at the
same time increasing urban quality of life.
$650bn
By 2025, 1 billion In 2010, as many Carbon emissions In 2018, 60% 15% of urban Decisions about
new homes as 980 million and energy of urban space land in the US is where buildings
are needed urban households consumption was sparsely vacant5 are placed will
worldwide, lacked decent are closely populated4 have implications
costing an housing2 connected to for one third
estimated USD urban density of a typical US
650 billion per and structure3 municipality’s
year, or USD 9–11 budget6
trillion overall1
PLANNING
Planning for local, circular material flows planners can ensure that the physical structure
of the city and its infrastructure are conducive to
The spatial planning of residential and/or industrial the effective reuse, collection, and redistribution
sites provides a key moment to lay the foundations of resources such as water, organics, industrial
for future circular material flows and resource by-products, building elements, and household
self-sufficiency. By integrating circular economy recyclables. See Policy levers.
principles early in the urban development process,
Compact city development in Curitiba effective land use. As of October 2016, over 7 acres
of new community spaces have been created.9
More than 30 years ago, the city of Curitiba
started to grow using a compact city development
strategy, which entailed mixed-use development Site-specific urban planning for material
and densification along five transport corridors flows and resources re-capture
served by a bus rapid transit (BRT) system. The
In London, circular economy principles were
development strategy has helped to improve the
integrated into the preliminary draft local plan
use of urban land, increase public transport use,
for the regeneration of the Old Oak and Park
and reduce the demand for private transport fuel.
Royal districts.10 The plan aims to create more
Today, Curitiba is one of Brazil’s wealthiest cities,
than 25,500 new homes and 65,000 jobs in 640
and the city has managed to maintain some of the
hectares of residential and industrial area, while
lowest congestion and transport costs in Brazil
at the same time ensuring optimal local materials
(around 10% of income).8
circulation to develop an “exemplary world class
neighbourhood underpinned by new business
Crowdsource-mapping of vacant space models, as well as new cultures of collaboration,
for community use in New York City innovation and community engagement”.11 Key
opportunities identified in the current planning
New York City has a large number of publicly phase are for buildings, fitouts, infrastructure, and
owned vacant lots. These empty spaces fill with spaces to be designed for reuse and disassembly
rubbish and blight communities they could from the outset, as well as resource-efficiency,
otherwise enliven. A citizen-driven pilot project, sharing, and adaptability. By capturing local
596 Acres, created an interactive crowdsourced resources such as water, heat, organics, and solid
map of vacant space, and assisted neighbourhood- waste for reuse and using underused space for
led campaigns to turn inner-city land into farming, the draft plan aims to ensure the area’s
community space, such as gardens, farms, and environmental and economic resilience.12
playgrounds that support social cohesion and
PLANNING
EXAMPLES OF BENEFITS:
PLANNING
ENDNOTES
1 UN Habitat, Urbanization and development: emerging futures 12 Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation, Local plan
world cities report (2016) p. 47 second revised draft for regulation 19 (2) Consultation (2018)
p. 20, 31, 124, 154
2 Ibid.
13 Smart Growth America, Building better budgets (2013) p. ii
3 European Environment Agency, Urban sustainability issues —
what is a resource-efficient city? (2015) p. 48 14 City of London, Ontario, Building a mixed-use, compact city
(2013) p. 40
4 OECD, Rethinking urban sprawl: moving towards
sustainable cities (2018) p. 3 15 OECD, Rethinking urban sprawl (2018)
5 M. Pagano and A. Bowman, Vacant land in cities: an urban 16 Smart Growth America, Building better budgets (2013) p. iii
resource (2000) p. 1
17 Deloitte, The benefits of mixed use in the Southern Industrial
6 Smart Growth America, Building better budgets (2013) p. 1 Area (2015) p. ii
7 UN Habitat, Planning and design for sustainable urban 18 UN Habitat, Planning and design for sustainable urban mobili-
mobility: global report on human settlements (2013) pp. vii, ty: global report on human settlements (2013) p. 24–25
39, 91–93
19 New Climate Economy, Better growth, better climate: the new
8 Ibid., p. 98; C40 Cities, Good practice guide: Bus Rapid Transit climate economy Report (2014) p. 61
(2016) p. 15; , J. Goodman et al., Curitiba’s bus system is model
for rapid transit, Race Poverty and the Environment (2005) 20 C. Montgomery, Tackling the crisis of social disconnection,
pp. 75–76 Happy City (1 July 2017) , Happy City, Walkability
9 596 Acres, Impact, One Dollar Lots; onedollarlots.org 21 F. O’Sullivan, Barcelona forces banks to turn repossessed
homes into affordable housing, CityLab (17 April 2018)
10 Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation, Local plan
second revised draft for regulation 19 (2) consultation (2018) 22 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, SUN, and McKinsey Center for
pp. 20, 31, 124, 154 Business and Environment, Growth Within: a circular economy
vision for a competitive Europe (2015) p. 86
11 ARUP, OPDC, and LWARB, Circular and sharing economy
scoping study for Old Oak and Park Royal (2017) 23 International Resource Panel, The weight of cities (2018) p. 79
DISCLAIMER
This document has been produced by a team from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Arup provided expert input. The Ellen MacArthur
Foundation makes no representations and provides no warranties in relation to any aspect of the document, including regarding the
advisability of investing in any particular company or investment fund or other vehicle. Whilst care and attention has been exercised in the
preparation of the document and its analyses, relying on data and information believed to be reliable, neither the Foundation nor any of its
employees or appointees shall be liable for any claims or losses of any nature in connection with information contained in this document
including, but not limited to, lost profits or punitive or consequential damages.
DESIGNING
DESIGNING
How buildings are designed is key to how they are used, the impact they
have on their surroundings, and how long they are fit for purpose for.
Design can either improve or impede building performance, longevity, use,
and after-use management. Incorporating circular economy principles into
the design of buildings is therefore an important action to improve the time
they are fit for purpose, as well as optimising construction and disassembly.
Only 20–30% of More than 80% of the total US cities may be 1–3°C 33% of people over 60 in
construction and energy consumption in a warmer in the daytime and the UK would like a smaller
demolition waste (CDW) is building’s life is consumed up to 12°C warmer in the residence, but only 10%
recycled or reused, which during its use2 evening than surrounding actually downsize4
is often due to poor design areas due to the
and lack of information on heat-island effect3
building contents1
Designing for adaptable and flexible use modular design. Open-source solutions can
accelerate design innovation, as the platforms learn
New concepts and techniques, such as modular from their users, and offer another way to scale the
units and moveable interior walls, are bringing uptake of best-practice circular economy
greater flexibility and resource-efficiency into building approaches.8
residential and commercial buildings. These
methods support the efficient and effective use of
a building during its lifetime, such as repurposing a Integrating material choices into design
commercial building into housing, using modularity
Building materials used today can be unsuitable
to downsize a home or an office, or supporting
for high-value reuse if they contain toxic or harmful
sharing and mixed functionality.5 Flexible design
elements. Selecting safe and healthy materials
also supports incremental and participatory
to be used in buildings can result in healthier
housing; to begin with, only the essential parts
living and working environments for residents,
of the building are completed, allowing the
as well as encourage the looping of materials at
residents to expand and adapt the building as they
the end of their use. Adapting a building’s design
need and can afford. This also opens up a way
to incorporate locally available materials could
for low-income groups to access better-quality
also then actively support a local economy that
housing while contributing to building longevity.6
sources, uses, and reuses materials locally. (See
City Case Study: Venlo)
Using collaborative design processes
Using collaborative, multi-stakeholder processes Taking design inspiration from nature
supported by Building Information Modelling
Nature-inspired design can create effective
(BIM)7 in the design phase, allows designers
building solutions. Using a building’s exterior for
to coordinate with other stakeholders (clients,
energy production (for example by integrating
engineers, developers, deconstruction companies).
solar panels in roofs, windows or façades) is widely
BIM platforms can bring together the entire supply
applied and the technology continues to develop.
chain, and enable the end-customer to know
Low-tech solutions, such as bioclimatic and passive
what is in the building, and what the building
design, make use of natural conditions to cool,
and its components have been used for. This
heat, light, and ventilate buildings. These increase
transparency facilitates reuse and recycling of
a building’s performance, and minimise energy
building components and materials. Open-source
consumption.9 Biophilic design, i.e. greening of
design platforms, such as WikiHouse, Paperhouses,
building exteriors, façades and roofs, reduces air
and Abari, allow architects to share blueprints
pollution, noise, flooding and the urban
with end-users so that they can customise and
heat-island effect.
construct buildings to their own needs. These
blueprints inherently support adaptable and
DESIGNING
Modular and flexible meeting rooms and internal fittings to allow for easy subdivision,
interactivity and flexibility over time, which
A modular meeting room unit, called Jack, has facilitate the prolonging of the building’s lifespan.
been developed to meet Google’s rapidly changing Integrated smart services including concrete core
needs for meeting spaces. The unit can easily cooling, passive systems that maximise natural
be assembled, reassembled, and reconfigured daylighting and ventilation, and power and data
in a variety of ways to create differently sized, systems in raised access floors also help with
fully or partially enclosed spaces in Google’s repairs, maintenance, and longevity.12
open-plan London office, which improves the work
environment, use of the building, and
increases productivity.10 Using the local climate and ancient design
Pearl Academy of Fashion in Jaipur mixes modern
Incremental social housing architecture with local ancient Rajasthani building
technology to deal with a hot desert climate
The Iquique project in Chile is an incremental and without artificial cooling. A 1,500-year-old cooling
participatory housing concept, developed by the system (a pool of water in the base of the building)
company Elemental. With a budget of USD 7,500 creates a comfortable microclimate that keeps
per home (including land), buildings are designed the building 20 degrees Celsius cooler inside than
for low-income households but with middle-class the outdoor temperature. Other elements, such as
needs in mind. This ensures that the building’s shell latticed clay screens, absorb heat while decorating
will be useful for longer and limits the need for and enhancing cultural aesthetics.13
reconstruction. Initially, only half of the building
is constructed, including three floors with the
essential elements such as a kitchen, bedroom, Singapore aims to be the
roof, and sanitary installations. This makes the greenest city in the world
house fully habitable, but with the anticipation
Since the early 1960s, Singapore has had a strong
of additional rooms being added as and when
ambition to green itself in order to become a highly
residents can afford the expansion.11
liveable and competitive city. Sky-rise greenery
has increasingly become an essential component
Low-energy building with flexible interior of the city’s development plan, in part due to the
limited amount of land. The city’s 72 hectares of
White Collar Factory is a 16-storey building in
rooftop gardens and green walls are set to triple by
London designed to reduce occupational carbon
2030. These, combined with 4,172 hectare of green
emissions by 25% and offer a 10–33% annual
space (parks and park connectors), reduce the
reduction in operational energy costs. It contains
city’s heat-island effect, improve air quality, reduce
commercial, residential and public spaces, and
noise, help absorb stormwater, and increase urban
has been designed using adaptable floor plates
biodiversity.14
DESIGNING
EXAMPLES OF BENEFITS:
per night.23
ECONOMIC
PRODUCTIVITY
COMMUNITY AND
SOCIAL PROSPERITY
Reducing operation and maintenance costs
Implementation of circular economy design
opportunities in Chinese cities, such as green Improving living conditions
and smart buildings, would reduce operation and
maintenance costs by 10% in 2030 and 28% in Green rooftops can facilitate social and recreational
2040, compared with the current activities or be used for urban agriculture, which
development path.15 brings a broad range of societal benefits such
as improved neighbourhood relations, worker
creativity and productivity, or supporting learning
Increasing workforce performance and food production to increase self-sufficiency.24
Designing for better indoor air quality (low
concentrations of CO2 and pollutants, and
high ventilation rates) in offices can lead to
improvements in workforce performance of RESOURCE USE
up to 8%.16
HEALTH AND
Reducing material costs
ENVIRONMENT
Locally appropriate materials can be more
affordable. In China, the cost of a bamboo façade
Reducing the need for air could be 60% lower than that of a concrete one
conditioning and heating and can be built in a modular fashion, strongly
supporting adaptable use.26
Trees in urban areas can cool the air by between
2 and 8 degrees Celsius, reduce air conditioning
needs by 30%, and save energy used for heating Reducing embodied energy
by 20–50%.18 A bio-composite building façade panel could
reduce the embodied energy in façade
Reducing air pollution systems by up to 50% compared to
conventional construction.27
Green façades can lead to a reduction in
concentrations of particulate matter by 10–20% in
the immediate surroundings.19 Increasing resource-efficiency
Engineered clay can offer an alternative to
Reducing noise concrete, and uses up to 15% less material, requires
less energy to produce, and can be recycled
Green façades can reduce sound levels from after use.28
emergent and traffic noise sources by up
to 10 dB(A).20
Reducing energy consumption
Supporting better health Insulated walls and efficient glazing can reduce
energy consumption twofold or more.29 Compared
Spending time near trees improves physical and to traditional houses, buildings built to passive
mental health, while decreasing blood pressure house standards save 80% of heating energy and
and stress.21 50% of energy for cooling and dehumidification.30
DESIGNING
ENDNOTES
1 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Towards the circular 15 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, The circular economy
economy (2013) p. 16; M. Honicet et al., Data- and opportunity for urban and industrial innovation in China
stakeholder-management framework for the implementation (2018) p. 53
of BIM-based material passports, Journal of Building
Engineering (2019) 16 World Green Building Council, About green buildings,
worldgbc.org
2 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Circular economy in India:
rethinking growth for long-term prosperity (2016) p. 30 17 Dodge Data and Analytics, World green building trends 2016:
Europe (2016) p. 1
3 Arup, Cities alive: green building envelope (2013) p. 24
18 Food and Agricultural Organisation, Video: benefits of urban
4 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, SUN, and McKinsey Center for trees (2016)
Business and Environment, Growth Within: a circular economy
vision for a competitive Europe (2015) p. 83 19 Arup, Cities alive: green building envelope (2013) p. 13
DISCLAIMER
This document has been produced by a team from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Arup provided expert input. The Ellen MacArthur
Foundation makes no representations and provides no warranties in relation to any aspect of the document, including regarding the
advisability of investing in any particular company or investment fund or other vehicle. Whilst care and attention has been exercised in the
preparation of the document and its analyses, relying on data and information believed to be reliable, neither the Foundation nor any of its
employees or appointees shall be liable for any claims or losses of any nature in connection with information contained in this document
including, but not limited to, lost profits or punitive or consequential damages.
MAKING
MAKING
54%
Construction materials 11% of global energy Up to 40% of urban solid 54% of construction and
and the building sector related CO2 emissions waste is construction and demolition waste in Europe
are responsible for more can be attributed to the demolition waste (CDW)3 is landfilled4
than one-third of global construction industry2
resource consumption1
Developing ‘buildings as
Building with resource-efficient material banks’ (BAMB)
construction techniques
Technology such as building information
New industrial construction techniques are gaining modelling (BIM) and similar digital building
traction due to their many benefits, including mapping technology can help turn buildings into
cost-efficiency and reduced waste generation. ‘banks of material’. With such building material
Prefabricated building elements (such as a wall or maps, owners will have information on what
sections of a wall) can easily be assembled on-site, materials and components are in the building,
significantly reducing construction time. where they are sourced from, and guidance on
3D printing (also known as additive manufacturing) their potential future use. This makes reusing
of building units on- or off-site, from components building components and recycling materials
significantly easier.7
MAKING
EXAMPLES OF BENEFITS
MAKING
HEALTH AND
RESOURCE USE
ENVIRONMENT
MAKING
ENDNOTES
1 OECD, Working party on resource 14 Circle Economy, Fabric, TNO, Gemeente
productivity and waste: a policy study on Amsterdam, Circular Amsterdam: a vision and
the sustainable use of construction materials action agenda for the city and metropolitan
(2015) p. 4 area (2016) pp. 4, 40
2 UN Environment, Global status report 2017: 15 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, The circular
towards a zero-emission, efficient, and resilient economy opportunity for urban and industrial
buildings and construction sector (2017) p. 14 innovation in China (2018) p. 54
3 World Bank, What a waste: a global review of 16 Circle Economy, .Fabric, TNO, Gemeente
solid waste management (2012) p. 16 Amsterdam, Circular Amsterdam: a vision and
action agenda for the city and metropolitan
4 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, SUN, and area (2016) p. 40
McKinsey Center for Business and
Environment, Growth Within: a circular 17 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Circular economy
economy vision for a competitive Europe in India: rethinking growth for long-term
(2015) p. 20 prosperity (2016) p. 38
5 Arup, Additive manufacturing: design method 18 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, A circular
for critical structural steel elements, arup.com economy in Brazil: case study appendix (2017)
p. 9; Whirlwind Steel, Impacts of 3D printing
6 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, The circular on the construction industry (30 March 2016)
economy opportunity for urban and industrial
innovation in China (2018) p. 47 19 R. Lawson and R. Ogden, Sustainability and
process benefits of modular construction, Pro-
7 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Circular economy ceedings: TG57 – Special Track. 18th CIB World
in India: rethinking growth for long-term Building Congress (2010) p. 50
prosperity (2016) p. 36; BAMB Buildings as
Material Banks 20 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, The circular
economy opportunity for urban and industrial
8 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Circular economy innovation in China (2018) p. 53
in India: rethinking growth for long-term
prosperity (2016) p. 35 21 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, The circular
economy opportunity for urban & industrial
9 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Superuse innovation in China (2018) p. 54
Studios: Finding and utilising ‘waste’
materials for construction purposes 22 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Circular
economy in India: rethinking growth for long-
10 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Circular economy term prosperity (2016) p. 37; Lendager Group,
in India: rethinking growth for long-term The resource rows, Lendager.com
prosperity (2016) p. 36
23 Circle Economy, .Fabric, TNO, Gemeente
11 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, A circular Amsterdam, Circular Amsterdam: a vision and
economy in Brazil: case study appendix (2017) action agenda for the city and metropolitan
p. 9; Whirlwind Steel, Impacts of 3D printing area (2016) p. 4, 40
on the construction industry (30 March 2016)
24 R. Lawson and R. Ogden, Sustainability and
12 Circle Economy, .Fabric, TNO, Gemeente process benefits of modular construction,
Amsterdam, Circular Amsterdam A vision and Proceedings: TG57 – Special Track. 18th CIB
action agenda for the city and metropolitan World Building Congress (2010) p. 50
area (2016) pp. 4, 40
13 OVAM, Employment impact of the transition to
a circular economy: literature study (2018) p.
22
DISCLAIMER
This document has been produced by a team from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Arup provided expert input. The Ellen MacArthur
Foundation makes no representations and provides no warranties in relation to any aspect of the document, including regarding the
advisability of investing in any particular company or investment fund or other vehicle. Whilst care and attention has been exercised in the
preparation of the document and its analyses, relying on data and information believed to be reliable, neither the Foundation nor any of its
employees or appointees shall be liable for any claims or losses of any nature in connection with information contained in this document
including, but not limited to, lost profits or punitive or consequential damages.
ACCESSING
ACCESSING
Buildings in cities are often underused, but this can be countered through
shared use, new business models, and reconfigurable building designs.
New sharing-schemes and business models for residential and commercial
buildings can have numerous benefits, including lowering the financial barrier
of accessing built space. Aided by digital technology, these use models are
gaining traction through a broad range of different sharing schemes such
as home sharing, co-living and co-working offices. Design features can also
enable greater use of space, such as moving walls which enable users to
reconfigure spaces as needs change, and thereby also improving building use.
60% 49%
9%
Globally, one-third In the OECD, 60% of European 49% owner-occupied 20% of retail space
of urban dwellers households on office space is homes in the UK are in New York City is
struggle financially average spend unused during ‘under-occupied’ (at vacant and fit for
to secure decent around 21% of their working hours3 and least two bedrooms other commercial
housing1 gross adjusted in India 15% of office more than stated purposes6
disposable income on space is reported need)5
keeping a roof over vacant4
their heads2
ACCESSING
ACCESSING
EXAMPLES OF BENEFITS
Increasing utilisation
In London, peer-to-peer renting, better urban
planning, office sharing, repurposed buildings, and RESOURCE USE
multipurposed buildings, increases the value of
new buildings and can double utilisation of 20% of
London’s buildings by 2036, saving over GBP 600
million annually.16 Making the best use of buildings
As building utilisation increases, cities may
Decreasing space need find themselves with more space available and
By introducing flexible working for 18,000 staff a reduced need to construct new buildings
in 20% of their offices, the Lloyds Banking Group – countering urban sprawl and resource
were able to remove 1,000 desks from their consumption.20
London offices and saved GBP 10 million.17
Attracting talent
Shared space offers companies the opportunity
to facilitate remote working, and attract talent by
meeting employee preferences for flexibility and a
diverse working environment.18
ACCESSING
ENDNOTES
1 McKinsey, Tackling the world’s affordable 11 3Space, Cabinet Office, Croydon and
housing challenge (October 2014) Wimbledon
2 OECD Better Life Index, Housing 12 HomeShare, About homesharing, homeshare.
org
3 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, SUN, and
McKinsey Center for Business and Environ- 13 Spacious, How it works, spacious.com;
ment, Growth Within: a circular economy vision N. Bowles, ‘Sorry, power-lunchers. This
for a competitive Europe (2015) p. 83 restaurant is a co-working space now’, The
New York Times (8 July 2018)
4 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Circular economy
in India: rethinking growth for long-term 14 DoepelStrijkers, Circl Interiors
prosperity (2016) p. 34
15 D. White and P. White, 4 ways co-working
5 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, SUN, and spaces inspire innovation and collaboration,
McKinsey Center for Business and Entrepreneur Europe (8 June 2017);
Environment, Growth Within: a circular S. Soni, Makerspaces: the ‘Lego’ of startups,
economy vision for a competitive Europe Entrepreneur Europe (6 May 2016)
(2015) p. 83
16 London Waste and Recycling Board, Towards a
6 C. Kilgannon, ‘This Space Available’, The New circular economy – context and opportunities
York Times (6 September 2018) (2015) p. 22
7 For Example, cities including Paris, 17 Arup, The Circular Economy in the built
Amsterdam, and Berlin have started environment (2016) p. 23
regulating commercial home sharing, which
includes introducing a cap on how many days 18 CBRE, Occupier survey report 2017 (2017)
homeowners can sub-let through short-term pp. 9–11
leases. N. Lomas, Amsterdam to halve 19 D. White and P. White, 4 ways co-working
Airbnb-style tourist rentals to 30 nights a spaces inspire innovation and collaboration
year per host, TechCrunch (2017); Airbnb, entrepreneur Europe (8 June 2017);
New rules for home sharers in Berlin: the S. Soni, Makerspaces: the ‘Lego’ of startups,
new housing law, airbnb.com (2018) Entrepreneur Europe (6 May 2016)
8 HomeShare, About homesharing, homeshare. 20 Y. Voytenko et al., Sustainability framings of
org accommodation sharing, Environmental
9 WeWork, WeWork office space locations, Innovation and Societal Transitions (2017)
wework.com
10 A. Peters, Hoffice turns your apartment into a
free – and incredibly productive – coworking
space, Fast Company (29 January 2015)
DISCLAIMER
This document has been produced by a team from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Arup provided expert input. The Ellen MacArthur
Foundation makes no representations and provides no warranties in relation to any aspect of the document, including regarding the
advisability of investing in any particular company or investment fund or other vehicle. Whilst care and attention has been exercised in the
preparation of the document and its analyses, relying on data and information believed to be reliable, neither the Foundation nor any of its
employees or appointees shall be liable for any claims or losses of any nature in connection with information contained in this document
including, but not limited to, lost profits or punitive or consequential damages.
30% of global energy Up to 21% of water use Around 10% of EU 9/10 existing buildings in
consumption and 28% of in Europe happens in households struggle to pay the EU will still be in use
the world’s energy-related buildings2 their energy bills3 in 20504
CO2 emissions are linked to
the use of buildings1
EXAMPLES OF BENEFITS
Increasing productivity
Improving building insulation can lead to improved Reducing energy consumption
thermal comfort, and therefore reap productivity through refurbishment
benefits. A study estimates that every EUR 1
invested in insulation, results in EUR 0.78 benefit Through simple refurbishment solutions, it is
in a reduction of days missed. Productivity possible to reduce energy consumption by 20–30%
improvements due to better air quality can in existing buildings.17 Deep refurbishment can cut
reach 8–11%.13 building-related energy consumption in Europe up
to 80%, saving the EU over 30% of its total energy
use (equivalent of 4 billion barrels annually).18
ENDNOTES
1 UN Environment, Global status report 2017: 12 European Parliament, Boosting building
towards a zero-emission, efficient, and resilient renovation: what potential and value for
buildings and construction sector (2017) p. 14; Europe? (2016) p. 52
International Resource Panel, The weight of
cities (2018) 13 Ibid.,
2 BIO Intelligence Service, Water performance 14 Ibid., pp. 51, 52, 54,
of buildings (2012) p. 9 15 Ibid., pp. 22, 51
3 European Parliament, Boosting building 16 Renovate Europe, Multiple benefits of
renovation: what potential and value for renovating, renovate-europe.eu
Europe? (2016) p. 53
17 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, SUN, and
4 Renovate Europe, Multiple benefits of McKinsey Center for Business and
renovating, renovate-europe.eu Environment, Growth Within: a circular
5 Arup, The circular economy in the built economy vision for a competitive Europe
environment (2016) p. 36; Arup, Smart city (2015) p. 85
opportunities for London (2016) 18 European Parliament, Boosting building
6 Refurbishing here used synonymously with renovation: what potential and value for
renovation, deep renovation, and retrofit Europe? (2016) pp. 21, 51, Renovate Europe,
Multiple benefits of renovating,
7 European Parliament, Boosting building renovate-europe.eu
renovation: what potential and value for
Europe? (2016) p. 22 19 UN Environment, Global status report 2017:
towards a zero-emission, efficient, and resilient
8 Arup, The Circular economy in the built buildings and construction sector (2017) p. 10
environment (2016) p. 41
20 Schneider Electric, Predictive maintenance
9 3Space, Barclays Hatch, 3space.org strategy for building operations: a better
approach (2014) p. 4
10 SparEnergi.dk, Middelfart Kommune,
SparEnergi.dk, Introduktion til ESCO, 21 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, The circular
economy opportunity for urban and industrial
11 Renovate Europe, Multiple benefits of innovation in China (2018) p. 50
renovating, renovate-europe.eu
DISCLAIMER
This document has been produced by a team from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Arup provided expert input. The Ellen MacArthur
Foundation makes no representations and provides no warranties in relation to any aspect of the document, including regarding the
advisability of investing in any particular company or investment fund or other vehicle. Whilst care and attention has been exercised in the
preparation of the document and its analyses, relying on data and information believed to be reliable, neither the Foundation nor any of its
employees or appointees shall be liable for any claims or losses of any nature in connection with information contained in this document
including, but not limited to, lost profits or punitive or consequential damages.