Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indian Highways January 2020
Indian Highways January 2020
Journal of the
Indian Roads Congress
https://www.irc.nic.in
JOURNAL OF THE
INDIAN ROADS CONGRESS
VOLUME 81-1 ▪ JANUARY - MARCH, 2020 ▪ ISSN 0258-0500
No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means without prior written permission from the Secretary General, IRC.
The responsibility of the contents and the opinions expressed in this Journal is exclusively of the author(s) concerned. IRC and the Editor disclaim
responsibility and liability for any statements or opinion, originality of contents and of any copyright violations by the authors. The opinion expressed in
the papers and contents published in the Journal do not necessarily represent the views of the Editor or IRC.
Printed at: M/s Aravali Printers & Publishers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi-110020 `20
(All Rights Reserved, No part of this Publication shall be reproduced, translated
or transmitted in any from or by any means without the permission of the
Indian Roads Congress)
ANIL KUMAR BADITHA1 ARUN KUMAR GOLI2 M AMARANATH REDDY3 K SUDHAKAR REDDY4
ABSTRACT
High Modulus Asphalt Mixes (HiMA) with high performance have been successfully used initially in France and some other
countries later on to alleviate the problem of early failures of pavement. Development and adoption of such mixes will be useful
for high volume roads in India. In order to examine and evaluate performance of such HiMA mixes for Indian highways, a test
section was constructed on a National Highway (NH)-18, with two types of HiMA mixes in the base course layer. These HiMA
mixes were prepared with two hard grade binders; Propane Deasphalting (PDA) pitch and Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA)
polymer modified binder. The present study focuses on the evaluation of binder rheological properties and mix characteristics
of HiMA mixes used for the construction of test section. The characteristics of HiMA mixes were also compared with the
conventional Dense Bituminous Macadam (DBM-II) mix laid using viscosity grade (VG)-40 binder. Temperature and frequency
oscillation tests and multiple stress creep and recovery tests were conducted on the binders to study the rheological and rutting
characteristics of the binders in terms of SHRP rutting parameter (G*/sinδ), non-recoverable creep compliance (Jnr), percent
recovery using Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR). Further, the plant produced mixes collected from field were evaluated for
mechanical properties (indirect tensile strength, resilient modulus) and rutting performance.
The Superpave rutting parameter (G*/sinδ), non recoverable creep compliance (Jnr) properties of binders suggest better rut
resistance of PDA pitch binder. HiMA mixes were observed to be superior in terms of their rut resistance when compared to
conventional bituminous mix. Further, the measured resilient modulus (Mr) values of HiMA mixes can be used for pavement
design purposes. Also, the study proved that there will be significant reduction in pavement thickness with the use of HiMA
mixes due to higher Mr values of mixes and improved performance than conventional DBM mix.
1, 2.
Research Scholar,
Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Kharagpur
3,4 .
Professor, Emails: manreddy@iitkgp.ac.in, ksreddy@civil.iitkgp.ac.in
1.
M. Tech (Transportation Engg.), Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, E-mail: suresh.suresh049@gmail.com
2.
Principal Scientist, CSIR- Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi, E-mail: sinha.crri@nic.in
3.
Assistant Professor, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, E-mail: shrabonyeq@gmail.com
Elements O Fe Si Ca Zn Mg Al
% 59.40 9.21 17.32 5.39 1.84 3.87 2.96
(Patil, 2009).
OMC (%) 10 9
Liquid Limit (%) - 28
Plastic Limit (%) - 15
PI (%) - 13
Fig. 8 Variation of Shear Stress with Horizontal
Permeability(m/sec) 1×10-4 1×10-6 Displacement of Zinc Slag (90% MDD).
6. Benkendorff PN (2006) Potential of Lead/ 18. BIS (2011) IS 2720: Part 16: Methods of Test for
Soils: Laboratory Determination of CBR. Published
Zinc Slag for use in Cemented Mine Backfill.
by Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, India.
Miner Process Extr Metall 115:171–173 . doi:
10.1179/174328506x109149 19. BIS (2011) IS 2720: Part 17: Laboratory Determination
of Permeability. Published by Bureau of Indian
7. Bishop, A. W. (1955). The use of the Slip Circle
Standard, New Delhi, India.
in the Stability Analysis of Slopes. Geotechnique,
5 (1), 7-17. 20. BIS (2011) IS 2720: Part 40: Methods of Test for
RAJIB CHATTARAJ1
ABSTRACT
NH 117 connects Kolkata to Bakkhali and is 137 km long National Highway. At Namkhana, ch 113 km of the NH, a river
named Hatania-Doania is there with high tidal variations, very near to Bay of Bengal. The NH was not connected by a
bridge to cross the river. The river is an important National inland waterway number 1 and connects Bangladesh through
waterways. So the primary requirement of construction of a bridge over this river was a minimum horizontal clearance of
100 metre and a vertical clearance of 10 metre from high tide level. Moreover, by roadways, this location was connected
from one side only and Bakkhali on the other side, just 24 km away from the crossing of the river is the Bay of Bengal. So,
the construction of a high-level bridge at the project site was a challenge. Moreover, in the DPR of the project the span
arrangement of the bridge was proposed with much lesser dimension. During execution, the proposed span arrangement
was not found to be suitable for the construction of the bridge. In this paper, the author being a part of the execution team,
tried to bring out why the span arrangement of the bridge had to be changed, what were the challenges faced, innovations
applied in the project and the success story of completion of this critical bridge project without any cost overrun and almost
within allowed time span through EPC model of contract for which the project had won MoRTH, GOI’s National Highway
gold award of excellence in the category of outstanding work in challenging situation.
1.
Superintending Engineer, PWD, Govt. of West Bengal, Email: chattarajrajib@gmail.com
• Stair case: 4 Nos. RCC Staircase have been provided on either side 160 meter
away from the Main Bridge for facilitating the pedestrians to cross the bridge
along the footpath.
• Retaining Wall: 125 meter Retaining Earth Wall have been provided on either
side of the Viaduct.
• Pedestrian Underpass: 2 Nos. pedestrian Underpasses have been provided at
Starting and End of the Viaduct.
• Crash Barrier: RCC Crash Barrier and Railing on Footpath portion have been
provided.
• Expansion Joint: Strip Seal Type Expansion Joints. Strip seal joints were
provided at A1, P2, P5, P8 and P10 on Kakdwip side and on Bakkhali side at
P17, P19, P22, P25 and A2 locations.
• Wearing Coat: 40 mm BC and 25 mm Mastic Asphalt have been provided as
wearing coat.
xi Major Bridge P12-P13, P13-P14 & P14-P15 = 85+170+85 = 340 m.
(Extra dosed cable stayed) Three Span Continuous Extra dosed Cable Stay Bridge with RCC Rectangular
Solid Pylon of 23 mtr height above bridge deck.
• Navigational Clearance “Obligatory”: Lateral clearance 100 mtr. and Vertical
Clearance 10 mtr. from HHTL is maintained for unobstructed movement of
inland water transport vessels/barge.
• Foundation: Double “D” Type Well Foundation of Depth 41mtr. at founding
RL (-) 39.00 m. and Well Cap of 18 m x 8 mtr* 2 mtr. height.
• Substructure/ Lower Pylon: RCC Solid Rectangular Pylon with cross
sectional dimension 2 mtr*3.5 mtr and 10 mtr. height above well cap and
upto Diaphragm/Pier head.
• Super Structure: Cast in situ segmental construction with a depth of 5.0 mtr.
to 4.00 mtr.
• Stay Cable: 10 Nos. on each Pylon. i.e. 40 Nos. Stay Cable have been provided
total in the span.
• Bearing: 4 Nos. POT cum PTFE Bearings and 2 Nos. of Metallic guided
bearing at End of Major Bridge i.e. at P12 and P15 have been provided.
• Expansion Joint: Modular Expansion Joint have been provided at each end of
Major Bridge i.e. at P12 & P15.
xii Approach Road/ Bituminous • Total 1665 mtr., designed for 10 Million Standard Axle (Msa) Bituminous
Road have been provided.
• Kakdwip Side: 937 mtr. approach road having width varying 10.00 mtr. to
19 mtr.
• Bakkhali Side: 728 mtr. approach road having width 10.0mtr. to 19.0 mtr.
• Lane Configuration: 7.0 mtr. carriage way width with 1.50 mtr. paved shoulder
xiii Approach Road/ CC Pavement 300 mtr. CC Pavement at Bakkhali Side have been provided at Toll Plaza Section.
xiv Service Road Total 4650 mtr. Service Road with design of 3 MSA designed have been provided
at both side of the River to facilitate the Local People having 6.0 mtr. Bituminous
carriage way width.
xv Box / Pipe Culvert 3 Nos. box Culverts and 1 Nos. Pipe Culvert have been provided for Drainage
System.
xvi Drain Total 4650 mtr. RCC Cover and Open Drain have been provided along the Service
Road of the Project.
xvii Toll Plaza Full functional 2 Lane Staggered Toll Plaza with 4 Nos. Toll Both, Canopy,
Automatic Barrier, Toll Management System have been provided at Bakkhali
side at Chainage 114+440. Also 1 No. 2 storied Administrative Building and
1 No. Sub Station Building have been provided for smooth operation of Toll
Collection System.
xviii Illumination System LED Lighting System have been provided throughout the Project Stretch @ 30
lux lighting system.
Fig. 1a
Fig. 1c Bakkhali Side Viaduct and the rest part of the Main Bridge
2.4 Design Data: Designed for Basic wind speed of 50 m/s without LL
Seismic data Another Design Case considering basic wind speed of 36
m/s with LL.
Structure lies in Seismic Zone -IV
3-Dimensional Static Analysis performed on Calculation
Z: Zone factor - 0.24 Model of the bridge.
I: Importance factor - 1.5 (service) & 1.0 (Constr.) Hydraulic data:
R: Response Reduction factor as per Table 9 of Design discharge: 4571 Cusec
IRC:6-2014. Velocity of flow: 2.56 m/sec
Static Analysis Performed on Calculation Model. Highest High Tide Level: 5.4 mt
Wind Loads Low tide level: -1.2 mt.
Load Calculation as per cl 209 of IRC-6:2014 MSL (Maximum Scour Level) : -20.194 mt
Fig.3 Detailed Drawing of the Double D well. Details of the Well Curb.
Photo 1 Carrying and placing the assembly of double D well curb along with sacrificial form work with 8 mm MS
plate and the reinforcement with the help of 2* 75 MT crane at the actual position of the well where
island was done with the help of sheet pile. (P-13), Kakdweep side.
Photo 2 Assembly of Double D Sacrificial Well Curb Along with the Reinforcement Being Placed at its Position by
Sliding Arrangement on P-14, Bakkhali side.
Photo 3 Sacrificial Steining Were Being Added to Well Curb at P-14 Location, Bakkhali Side.
Fig.6 Module of 3*40 Meter Continuous Span with PSC Girders and Diaphragm Wall but Without any Pier Cap and Bearing.
Photo 4 The Arrangement of Pier, 4 PSC Girders, Diaphragm Wall, and Deck Slab in the viaduct Portion.
Fig.6
DESIGN PERAMETERS
NON-SEISMIC: SEISMIC:
Vertical (Max) = 00.00 MT Vertical (Max) = 00.00 MT
Vertical (Min) = 00.00 MT Vertical (Min) = 00.00 MT
Horizontal Longitudinal = 00.00 MT Horizontal Longitudinal = 00.00 MT
Horizontal Transverse = 10.00 MT Horizontal Transverse = 170.00 MT
Longitudinal Movement = * 182.5mm
Fig. 8 Fig. 9
Photo 5a Photo 5b
Fig.10
Fig.10
JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN ROADS CONGRESS, JANUARY-MARCH 2020 37
PAPER NO. 705
INFORMATION SECTION
• Extremely quick replacements over weekends and/ 4. THE MAIN ACB TECHNOLOGIES
or over-night closures using total superstructure Three particular ACB technologies are: Prefabricated
replacement techniques where possible. Bridge Elements and Systems (PBES), Slide in Bridge
Deck Construction (SIBDC) and Geosynthetic Reinforced
2. HOW TO ACHIEVE ACB? Soil-Integrated Bridge System (GRS-IBS).
The work essentially (though not entirely) revolves around 4.1 Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems
Prefabrication, and comprises basically of : (PBES)
• Using Precast Superstructure Elements PBES are structural components of a bridge that
• Using Precast Substructure Elements and are cast/built away from the bridge-site or adjacent
to the site – and includes construction methods
• In some cases Precasting entire structure, with that reduce the onsite construction time compared
some cast-in-place work. with the time required by the conventional
construction methods.
1.
Consultant, World Bank, E-mail:rainavk@gmail.com
based erection would allow for repetitive use of modular • Integral abutments
superstructure systems, which could make contractors • Semi-integral abutments
more willing to invest in equipment-based methods of
erection to speed up the assembly. Repetitive use would • Precast approach slabs
allow contractors to spread the equipment costs over • Precast complete pier systems
several projects, which would help bring overall costs in
line with those of conventional construction. Where site • Conventional piers
condition makes crane-based erection difficult, overhead • Superstructure Modular systems
erection methods using ACB construction technologies,
• Decked steel stringer system
will provide an attractive alternative.
• Concrete deck (T-sections and Slab sections)
9. ACB STANDARD CONCEPTS
• Bridge erection systems
9.1 Standard concepts were developed for large scale
bridge replacement applications.They include complete • Erection using cranes
prefabricated modular systems and construction systems • Manual and motor driven carriers, moving atopa
as outlined below: deck
• Precast modular abutment systems • Launching systems
Photo 1 Placing The Precast Footing On The Sub- Photo 2 Complete Segmental Precast Footing
Footing. The Sub-Footing Does Not Need To Be (Source: PCI)
‘Formed’(Source PCI)
Photo 3 Placement Of Precast Abutment Section Photo 6 Completed Integral Precast Abutment Section
(Source: PCI) (Source: PCI)
Photo 4 Precast Abutment With Pin Connection Photo 7 Schematic Of Precast Deck Assembly
(Source: PCI) (Source: PCI)
C) Jacking
Photo 9 c
Photo 9 a (ii)
D) Launching
Photo 9 d (i)
Photo 9 d (ii)
E) Self-Propelled Modular Transport (SPMT) Photo 9 e (iv)
Photo 9 e (i)
Photo 9 e (v)
CONTENTS
Paper No. 703
¾ An Investigation on Mechanical Properties and Rutting Performance of Plant
Produced High Modulus Asphalt Mixes 03-11
by Anil Kumar Baditha, Arun Kumar Goli, Prof. M Amaranath Reddy
& Prof. K Sudhakar Reddy
Information Section
¾ Accelerated Construction of Bridges (ACB) 43-52
by Dr. V.K. Raina
Edited and Published by Shri Sanjay Kumar Nirmal, Secretary General, Indian Roads Congress, IRC HQ, Sector-6, R.K. Puram,
Kama Koti Marg, New Delhi - 110 022. Printed by Shri Sanjay Kumar Nirmal on behalf of the Indian Roads Congress
at M/s. Aravali Printers & Publishers Pvt. Ltd.