Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article 370 and 35A Have Been Revoked From The Constitution of India
Article 370 and 35A Have Been Revoked From The Constitution of India
ART. 370: 1949, Gave special status to Jammu and Kashmir, conferring it with the
power to have a separate constitution, a state flag and autonomy over the internal
administration of the state. Foreign affairs, defence and communications remained
the preserve of the central government.
ART. 35A: 1954, It defined "permanent residents" of the state and provide special
rights and privileges to those permanent residents. The state of Jammu and Kashmir
defined these privileges to include the ability to purchase land and immovable
property, ability to vote and contest elections, seeking government employment and
availing other state benefits such as higher education and health care. Non-
permanent residents of the state, even if Indian citizens, were not entitled to these
'privileges'.
These two articles became part of the Indian constitution in response to the promise
made by then PM Jawaharlal Nehru to Maharaja Hari Singh to grant a
Political/administrative independency to Kashmir.
LEGAL CRITIQUES
1- The special status cannot be reversed by the Center on its own, it could only be
reversed by the consent of the Kashmir Assembly. (If it passes a resolution
with the 2/3 majority only then the SS can be omitted) this guarantee has
been given by the constitution to the Kashmiris.
In 1954 Pm Mr. Nehru on the floor of Lok Sabah stated that The SS given to
Kashmir is IRON CLAD, there is only way to reverse it which is the consent of
the Kashmir Parliament
2- The reversal of the SS is the violation of the ACCESSION TREATY
AGREEMENT, which the maharaja of Kashmir signed with the Indian
government (the pre-condition: that Kashmir would enjoy its special status,
and non Kahmiris would not receive their Citizenship)
Therefore, the Method adopted by the Indian government is ILLEGAL.
3- Kashmir high court 2016: ART 370/35A stated that The SS of Kashmir is
permanent, it cannot be reversed in any case; Only the constituent assembly
(the one who made the constitution) of Kashmir has the power to pass the
resolution. The constituent assembly of Kashmir was dissolved in 1957 thus
the SS could not be reversed in any case.
2. India knows that one day, sooner or later, will have to face the Referendum
according to the resolution of the UN 1949, if he wants to become the member
of UN security council. Therefore, he is trying to increase the pro-Indian vote
bank.
RESPOSNCE OF PAKISTAN
SEVERING OF RELATIONS WITH INDIA:
- Downsizing of its diplomatic relations
- Cut of trade relations
- Closure of air space for general transportation
- Protest launched in Pakistan including AJK and across the world, protests
held in the country on every Friday, huge protests in Kashmir, in
Muzaffarabad, where the PM Khan conducted the biggest gathering.
- Protests all over the world: London, Washington, Brussels…
In the recent history of London (since 2nd world war) there haven’t been such
a big protest conducted by Sikhs, Pakistanis and Kashmiris.
PAKISTAN RESPONDED PRO-ACTIVELY
PM Khans accessed his counter parts several times, and so the FM
We used the UN platform wisely: Kashmir issue was taken to the UN security
council after 54 years.
Speech of Mr Khan in the UN assembly (which included climate change,
Islamophobia, money laundering and Kashmir), has been considered the best
speech ever in UN general assembly.
Legally/humanitarianly our stance is strong, but the world government decides on
the basis of econometrics. Therefore we should continue highlighting this issue at
every possible platform
THERE WAS NO FORMATABLE STEPS TAKEN AGAINST INDIA,
the world proofed that economies are more important than
human rights violation.