Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tier-2 Audit Checksheet
Tier-2 Audit Checksheet
Audit Person
Vendor (Tier 1)
Achieved Score: 0
×100 = 0
Total Score: 140
Total Overall Rating
Description :
Name of the Customers and their
dependence
MSME Category
Product Category
TA/JV/Home grown
Domestic/Export
Key Observations
Detail report is enclosed for your kind consideration & improvement actions -
0 1 2
1 0/ 8 0 0 0
2 0/ 6 0 0 0
3 0 / 10 0 0 0
4 0/ 4 0 0 0
5 0/ 6 0 0 0
6 0/ 6 0 0 0
7 0/ 2 0 0 0
8 0 / 12 0 0 0Total
Achieved
9 0 / 10 0 0 0
10 0 / 10 0 0 0
11 0/ 8 0 0 0 1.Production
19. preparation
2.Regulation for initial
12 0 / 10 0 0 0 Legal Compliance & Environment production control
14 0/ 6 0 0 0
17. Scale and Top Management bandwidth
15 0/ 6 0 0 0
16 0/ 4 0 0 0 50
18 0 / 10 0 0 0
19 0/ 6 0 0 0 0
15. Adequate testing facility
Total
(MSI 0 / 140 0 0 0
L)
Pre decided negative Improvement Submission
Last Audit Rating
marking (if any) Date
14.Critical parts Management
Tier-2/002
13.Handling Management
0
0
Part Name 0
Regarding management /
Do you implement follow-up to control
implementation by 1 the schedule and progress of production
2 production preparation plan
preparation items? Incl top management
/ report (master plan)
Supplier Name 0
Auditors:
2.
Regulation for
initial
production 0
0
control
Part Name 0
1
Do you define unexpected change
(unusual) and planned change clearly?
Do you define procedure(rules applied
Definition and 2 from sharing information to result
1 implementation of changing confirmation) at change occurrence?
management
Do you record product quality check
3. 3 results to ensure traceability? Incl
Changing
retroactive checks
management
1
Do you define and control initial part
clearly?
Definition and control Do you control initial parts separately
2 method for initial part and make quality records about them?
2
(both internal and outsourced process
are included)
MARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLLOW UP REPORT
VENDOR ATTENDEES : 0
0
0
Part Name 0
0
0
Part Name 0
0
0
Part Name 0
1
Do you keep condition of production
equipment's, jigs and tools properly?
Production equipment's
2 management Do you keep condition of inspection
2 equipment's properly to ensure
accuracy?
Do you conduct daily/regularly check of
1 production equipment's, dies and jigs?
Are records of maintenance kept?
10. Auditors:
Supplier Name 0
Equipment/Ins
pection
equipment's
management 0
0
Part Name 0
12.
Products 0
0
management
Part Name 0
2
Do you have system to maintain Bins
/Trolleys in Good Condition.
Do you have Special checks/Inspection
1 for Maru A parameters of Maru A part are
14. available .
Critical parts 1 Maru A Parts Management Do you have Identification of Maru A
2
Management Process/Operator on Shop Floor.
3
Do you keep the repair history when
repairing & using Maru A items
Does the supplier has all inspection
1 instruments required as per drawing
requirements
15. Adequate Does the supplier has all Testing
testing 1 Testing Facility 2 Equipment/Rigs required as per drawing
facility requirements
Does the Supplier has trained manpower
3 to operate these inspection and testing
instruments
1
Conduct process audit as per process
16. Process control standard
1 As per PCS
Audit
2 Closure of all the observations
MARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLLOW UP REPORT
VENDOR ATTENDEES : 0
0
0
Part Name 0
PAT/Sales* PAT/Sales
4 4
D/E ratio
5 D/E Ratios* 5
ROCE* ROCE
6 6
MARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLLOW UP REPORT
VENDOR ATTENDEES : 0
0
0
Part Name 0
0
0
Part Name 0
Achieved Score 0
Audit Rating 0
Note :- * Scoring for these checkpoints will be started from Apr'20 onwards. Currently they have been added for data collection purpose only.
2955000
MANAGEMENT & FINANCIAL INFORMATION ( TIER-2 SUPPLIER)
VENDOR ATTENDEES : CEO/MD Name:
0
Supplier Name 0 Mob No:
Email Id:
Date of issue
Scale of
Organization
Expiry Date
2016-17
3 Net Sales (Rs Lacs) 2017-18
2018-19
2016-17
4 Net Profit ( Rs Lacs) 2017-18
2018-19
6 MSME Category
7 Industrial Climate
Does worker safety norms followed
Tonnage Range
Life of Machine
Machine condition
Summary: Based on data provided by supplier as above and shop floor visit following is the overall summary
Total 0 0 0 0 8 8 10 1
Monthly Avrg
Target
10
NA
8
8
1 19~20
16~17
17~18
18~19
0
16~17
17~18
18~19
19~20
1
4. Tier-2 Vendor - Internal Rejection (%) 5. No of Line Stoppages at T1 6. Defect at Tier-2 due to Tier-3
16~17 17~18 18~19 19~20 (upto jan) 16~17 17~18 18~19 19~20 16~17 17~18 18~19 19~20
Monthly Avrg Nos - - - - Nos - - - -
17~18
18~19
17~18
18~19
19~20
16~17
18~19
19~20
16~17
17~18
Monthly Avrg a b c a b c
Nos Nos
Remarks Data was available in % only Remarks :- No Line Stoppage Remarks :- Nil Suppliers
COPY TO : MARUTI VENDOR ASSESSMENT (TIER II) - COUNTERMEASURE REPORT
RECEIVING DATE PLANNED CHECKED APPROVED
PLANNING
PLANNING
CLUSTER NAME
TOTAL 0
AUDIT DATE
RECEIVING DATE
VERIFICATION
VERIFICATION
VERIFICATION
AUDIT PART NAME
SUB ITEM
ITEM NO. DESIRED IMPROVEMENT POINTS DETAIL OF IMPROVEMENT PLAN IN-CHARGE DATE RESULT OF VERIFICATION
NO.