Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Aggregate Planning

    Uploaded by

    Saumendra Sahoo
    The document compares three strategies - Level, Chase, and Mixed for meeting demand over four quarters. Level strategy maintains a steady production rate each quarter and carries the highest total inventory cost. Chase strategy chases demand closely each quarter but carries the highest total production cost. Mixed strategy balances production between quarters and has the lowest total cost.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Aggregate Planning

    Uploaded by

    Saumendra Sahoo
    9 views12 pages
    The document compares three strategies - Level, Chase, and Mixed for meeting demand over four quarters. Level strategy maintains a steady production rate each quarter and carries the highest total inventory cost. Chase strategy chases demand closely each quarter but carries the highest total production cost. Mixed strategy balances production between quarters and has the lowest total cost.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Aggregate Planning.xlsx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document compares three strategies - Level, Chase, and Mixed for meeting demand over four quarters. Level strategy maintains a steady production rate each quarter and carries the highest total inventory cost. Chase strategy chases demand closely each quarter but carries the highest total production cost. Mixed strategy balances production between quarters and has the lowest total cost.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    9 views12 pages

    Aggregate Planning

    Uploaded by

    Saumendra Sahoo
    The document compares three strategies - Level, Chase, and Mixed for meeting demand over four quarters. Level strategy maintains a steady production rate each quarter and carries the highest total inventory cost. Chase strategy chases demand closely each quarter but carries the highest total production cost. Mixed strategy balances production between quarters and has the lowest total cost.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 12

    Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

    Demand 24 30 48 42 144
    Capacity
    Regular 30 35 25 30 120
    OT 10 12 0 10 32
    Subcontract 36 36 36 36 144
    Demand 76 83 61 76 296
    Interest Cost Rs/pc/Qtr

    Level Strategy
    Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total
    Demand 24 30 48 42 144
    Open Inv 12 18 6 0
    Production 36 36 36 36 144
    Regular 30 35 25 30 120
    OT 6 1 0 6 13
    Subcontract 0 0 11 0 11
    Clos Inv 12 18 6 0 0
    Cost incl. Inv
    Carry 1176 1144 1373 1140 4833
    Chase Strategy
    Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total
    Demand 24 30 48 42 144
    Open Inv 0 0 0 0
    Production 24 30 48 42 144
    Regular 24 30 25 30 109
    OT 0 0 0 10 10
    Subcontract 0 0 23 2 25
    Clos Inv 0 0 0 0 0
    Cost incl. Inv
    Carry 720 900 2015 1410 5045

    MIXED Strategy
    Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total
    Demand 24 30 48 42 144
    Open Inv 8 25 2 0
    Production 32 47 25 40 144
    Regular 30 35 25 30 120
    OT 2 12 0 10 24
    Subcontract 0 0 0 0 0
    Clos Inv 8 25 2 0 0
    Cost incl. Inv
    Carry 1004 1605 756 1300 4665
    Costs

    30
    40
    55

    Costs

    30
    40
    55
    Costs

    30
    40
    55

    Costs

    30
    40
    55
    Gap 0 0 0 0
    Demand 24 30 48 42
    Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
    30 33 36 39
    R
    24 6
    40 43 46 49
    Q1 O
    6
    55 58 61 64
    S

    30 33 36
    R
    18 17
    40 43 46
    Q2 O
    1
    55 58 61
    S

    30 33
    R
    25
    40 43
    Q3 O

    55 58
    S
    5 6
    30
    R
    30
    40
    Q4 O
    6
    55
    S

    Total 24 30 48 42
    0
    144 4833
    Total Mfg. Capacity Total Cost

    30 30 918

    6 10 258

    0 36 0

    35 35 1101

    1 12 43

    0 36 0

    25 25 750

    0 0 0

    11 36 623

    30 30 900

    6 10 240

    0 36 0

    144 296 4833


    Gap 0 0 0 0
    Demand 24 30 48 42
    Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
    30 33 36 39
    R
    24
    40 43 46 49
    Q1 O

    55 58 61 64
    S

    30 33 36
    R
    30
    40 43 46
    Q2 O

    55 58 61
    S

    30 33
    R
    25
    40 43
    Q3 O

    55 58
    S
    23
    30
    R
    30
    40
    Q4 O
    10
    55
    S
    2

    Total 24 30 48 42
    0
    144 5045
    Total Mfg. Capacity Total Cost

    24 30 720

    0 10 0

    0 36 0

    30 35 900

    0 12 0

    0 36 0

    25 25 750

    0 0 0

    23 36 1265

    30 30 900

    10 10 400

    2 36 110

    144 296 5045


    Gap 0 0 0 0
    Demand 24 30 48 42
    Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
    Q1 R 30 33 36 39

    16 0 8 0
    O 40 43 46 49

    8 0 0 0
    S 55 58 61 64

    0 0 0 0
    Q2 R 30 33 36

    23 11 1
    O 40 43 46

    7 5 0
    S 55 58 61

    0 0 0
    Q3 R 30 33

    24 1
    O 40 43

    0 0
    S 55 58

    0 0
    Q4 R 30

    30
    O 40

    10
    S 55

    0
    Total 24 30 48 42
    0
    144 4725
    Total Mfg. Capacity Total Cost

    24 30 768

    8 10 320

    0 36 0

    35 35 1089

    12 12 495

    0 36 0

    25 25 753

    0 0 0

    0 36 0

    30 30 900

    10 10 400

    0 36 0
    144 296 4725

    You might also like