RAS MARKAZ CRUDE OIL PARK PROJECT

PUNCH LIST
Item
Punch List No. 9686-PO0025-CPP-PL-001 TGS System Date 22-Dec-20
Description

Company OTTCO P.O. No. CPP-RM-PO-0025 Contract No.

Contractor CPP P.O. Item No. Project No.

Vendor/Sub Vendor Honeywell Tag No.

Remarks VERIFIED BY
Action
Category/ Inititaed Close-out CPP (Mech)
Sl.No Discipline Photograph Description of item or Pending points taken Result CPP Engg EPC
Component by/Date Date Vendor Response Inspector VENDOR COMPANY
by/Date Response CONTRACTOR
Resposne
Line number 2 of BoM: Flange 6" ANSI 300RF, AISI
316 for 990 according to BoM quantity of material
to be 3 while quantity of actual presented material
was 1

- Page number 6 of drawing number 9620-51- Ordered quantity was 3 no, but seems 2 flanges have misplaced but under
PO0025-0001 to be update according to actual investigation. It may be 1 of the reason we have concerned to CPP that
appearance of material factory can’t hold the materials for long time so might have happened
that 2 flanges for this ordered were dispatched to other customer/client.
CPP Procurement CPP Procurement
Visual inspection/ Having said we have immediately raised new PO to factory for 2 Flanges
1 Visual 12/23/2020 Honeywell have accepted have accepted
flange (please see attached PO) & once those are available will be shipped out
vendor resposne vendor resposne
separately may be by/before Jan’21 end.
In current shipment, Honeywell will not invoice for this 2 short supply
flanges.

Line number 7 of BoM: VITO Flange NPS 6" ANSI

150 RF acc. ASME 16.5 with threaded G1/2
according to BoM quantity of material to be 3 while
quantity of actual presented material was 1

Ordered quantity was 3 no, but seems 2 flanges have misplaced but under
investigation. It may be 1 of the reason we have concerned to CPP that
factory can’t hold the materials for long time so might have happened
that 2 flanges for this ordered were dispatched to other customer/client.
CPP Procurement CPP Procurement
Visual inspection/ Having said we have immediately raised new PO to factory for 2 Flanges
2 Quantity 12/23/2020 Honeywell have accepted have accepted
flange (please see attached PO) & once those are available will be shipped out
vendor resposne vendor resposne
separately may be by/before Jan’21 end.
In current shipment, Honeywell will not invoice for this 2 short supply
flanges.

Termination details of actual mounted terminal box

on the radar gauge is not according to darawing

CPPE has cleared on

Nov 16, 2020.
We have submitted the drawing on 10-Nov-2020 & haven’t received the
CPP procurement
commented/approved drawing to do the revised submission & was
Documention/ shall expdite further
3 Functional test 12/23/2020 Honeywell informed to CPP team couple of times. Anyways this point is related to Refer CPPE response
terminalbox with
drawing revision & same shall be rectified once we receive Enraf GAD &
vendor/company
termination drawing returned from CPP.
whether they
received or not

since the radar gauge is designed for using in the

pipe and not for open area, and given this fact that
test is done on test bench on open area,
undersigned inspector cannot verify if measured
and read level and changing in the level is
according to project specification or not. Supplied Radar is for Still Well application & meets the Project Noted.This shall be
specifications & requirements. further verified
during SAT. Any non
Procedure to functional test the Radar @ Enraf Factory is on Test bench & compliance
by moving object this is also mentioned in the FAT Procedure. This identified during
functional test procedure is standard & applicable for all projects to SAT shall be in
Functionl test/
4 Functional test 12/23/2020 Honeywell verify the Radars are communicating with the CIU888 & readings are Refer CPPE response honeywell
radar gauge
available on EntisPro system. However all 3 Radars are tested for responsibility to
accuracy on the calibration bench & calibration certificate for all 3 Radars resolve it.
is submitted with CPP.
CPP QA shall advise
Having said & as clarified above the Antenna is for Still well application & further & get
meets the functional & accuracy requirements. company approval

FORM No:9686-QAQC-FRM--0035 Rev-03

 Since no any certified calibrated thermometer was
present dung the test undersigned inspector can
not verify if read value is correct or not.
As per the FAT procedure the Temperature reading is verified in the
HART SmartView & Entis System, same is demonstrated by our Enraf FAT
team. Purpose is readings should be same/similar in Entis System & HART Noted. approved
Smartview. There is no Thermometer & hence it is not mentioned as part FAT procedure shall
of FAT procedure. be followed during
Functionl test/
5 Visual No photo 12/23/2020 Honeywell Temperature Probe is standard function of 766 unit & Honeywell takes Refer CPPE response inspection.
radar gauge
the responsibility of its functionality, accuracy. CPP QA shall advise
further & get
We, Honeywell, confirm that all Enraf materials manufactured against this company approval
order meets the Project requirements & we take the responsibility to
demonstrate the functionality, accuracy during the SAT.

test of optional water probe, is not done due to

lack of water tank on the Honeywell building.

We understand this couldn’t be demonstrated, but could have been

possible if TPI visit was happened in the timing suggested from 9am till
5:30pm. After 4pm if TPI is visiting it is difficult to accommodate most of
the test as in the FAT room Water is not allowed & once the factory
timing is closed normally 5:30pm it is not possible to arrange. We
CPP QA shall advise
Functionl test/ managed to complete the FAT with the revised timing. However water Verified Honeywell
6 Functional test No photo 12/23/2020 Honeywell further & get
radar gauge probe is standard function of 766 unit & Honeywell takes the COC
company approval
responsibility of its functionality, accuracy.

We, Honeywell, confirm that all Enraf materials manufactured against this
order meets the Project requirements & we take the responsibility to
demonstrate the functionality, accuracy during the SAT.

Cat. A To be completed prior to dispatch.

Ahmad Yamoudi Mahesh Narawade, Dated: 06-Jan-2021

Cat. B To be attended at site prior to pre-com/com. Punch list originator (Name/Sign And Date) Vendor Representative (Name/Sign And Date)

FORM No:9686-QAQC-FRM--0035 Rev-03