Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Comparison

    Uploaded by

    JW Bee
    16 views1 page
    This document compares three route options for a project, listing the length, amount of embankment material needed, central cut depth, and final cut depth for each. Option 1 is the longest at 925 meters but requires the most embankment material. Option 2 is slightly longer at 959 meters with no embankment needed and the same central cut depth as Option 1. Option 3 is the shortest at 909 meters with the least amount of central cut but a shallower final cut depth.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Comparison.xlsx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document compares three route options for a project, listing the length, amount of embankment material needed, central cut depth, and final cut depth for each. Option 1 is the longest at 925 meters but requires the most embankment material. Option 2 is slightly longer at 959 meters with no embankment needed and the same central cut depth as Option 1. Option 3 is the shortest at 909 meters with the least amount of central cut but a shallower final cut depth.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    16 views1 page

    Comparison

    Uploaded by

    JW Bee
    This document compares three route options for a project, listing the length, amount of embankment material needed, central cut depth, and final cut depth for each. Option 1 is the longest at 925 meters but requires the most embankment material. Option 2 is slightly longer at 959 meters with no embankment needed and the same central cut depth as Option 1. Option 3 is the shortest at 909 meters with the least amount of central cut but a shallower final cut depth.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Comparison of the Different Route/ Solutions

    Final Cut
    Option Length Embankment (cum) Central Cut (m)
    (m)
    1 925 47080 86944 - 13.1
    2 959 - 86944 1 13.1
    3 909 - 44880 1 9

    You might also like