UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

FAKULTI KEJURUTERAAN MEKANIKAL

Program : Bachelor of Engineering (Hons) Mechanical (EM220/EM221)

Course : Applied Mechanics Lab

Code : MEC 554

Lecturer : Ahmad Hussein Abdul Hamid

Group : EMD5A4 (4)

MEC 554 - LABORATORY

REPORT
TITLE : Flow Pass a Circular Cylinder
No NAME STUDENT ID SIGNATURE

1. MUHAMMAD AZRI FIKRI BIN ARBAIN 2019564353

2. MUHAMMAD HARITH BIN MOHD ZAHID 2019564199

3. MUHAMMAD FATIHIN BIN MOHANI 2019528189

4. MUHAMMAD HAYYUL QAYYUM BIN MOHD 2019704561

HALIM

5. MUHAMMAD IKHMAL HIJJAZ BIN MOHD JASMI 2019705053

LABORATORY SESSION: 4 OGOS 2020

REPORT SUBMISSION: 7 OGOS 2020

1
 1.0 LIST OF CONTENT

No list Page
1. LIST OF CONTENT 2
2. LIST OF FIGURES 3
3. INTRODUCTION 4
4. THEORETICAL 5-7
5. OBJECTIVES 8
6. APPARATUS AND PROCEDURES 9-11

7. RESULT AND CALCULATION 12-18

8. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 19-28
9. REFERENCES 29
10. APPENDICES 30

2
 2.0 LIST OF FIGURES

No List Of Figures Pages

1. Figure 1: Boundary layer separation location 5

2. Figure 2: Typical boundary layer velocity profile at various locations on the 6

cylinder, surface pressure distribution for in viscid flow and boundary layer
flow

3. Figure 3: Wind tunnel 10

4. Figure 4: Circular cylinder with holes 10

5. Figure 5: Multi-tube manometer 11

6. Figure 6: Controller speed 11

7. Figure 7: Test 1 line chart 13

8. Figure 8: Test 2 line chart 15

9. Figure 9: Test 3 line chart 15

3
1.0 INTRODUCTION

A wind tunnel is a tool used in aerodynamic research to study the effects of air moving past
solid objects. A wind tunnel consists of a tubular passage with the object under test mounted in the
middle. Air is made to move past the object by a powerful fan system or other means. The test
object, often called a wind tunnel model, is instrumented with suitable sensors to measure
aerodynamic forces, pressure distribution, or other aerodynamic-related characteristics.

Air is blown or sucked through a duct equipped with a viewing port and instrumentation
where models or geometrical shapes are mounted for study. Typically the air is moved through the
tunnel using a series of fans. For very large wind tunnels several meters in diameter, a single large
fan is not practical, and so instead an array of multiple fans are used in parallel to provide sufficient
airflow. Due to the sheer volume and speed of air movement required, the fans may be powered
by stationary turbofan engines rather than electric motors.

Due to the effects of viscosity, the cross-section of a wind tunnel is typically circular rather
than square, because there will be greater flow constriction in the corners of a square tunnel that
can make the flow turbulent. A circular tunnel provides a smoother flow. There are other way to
smoothing the flow such as flow straightener, sometimes called a honeycomb, is a device used to
straighten the air flow in a wind tunnel. It is a passage of ducts, laid along the axis of main air
stream to minimize the lateral velocity components caused by swirling motion in the air flow
during entry. The cross-section shapes of these "honeycombs" may be of square, circular and
regular hexagonal cells.

The inside facing of the tunnel is typically as smooth as possible, to reduce surface drag
and turbulence that could impact the accuracy of the testing. Even smooth walls induce some drag
into the airflow, and so the object being tested is usually kept near the center of the tunnel, with an
empty buffer zone between the object and the tunnel walls. There are correction factors to relate
wind tunnel test results to open-air results.

4
2.0 THEORY

The structure and development of vicious flow over a cylinder is described in Figure 1
below. The development of the boundary layer and changes in velocity profile from the stagnation
point A until flow separation at point E are described in Figure 2. These changes are closely linked
to the change of pressure gradient from A to F. Negative pressure gradient tends to maintain
laminar boundary layer, while positive pressure gradient will accelerate it to turbulent and
subsequently reverse flow resulting in flow separation.

Figure 1: Boundary layer separation location

5
 Figure 2: Typical boundary layer velocity profile at various locations on the cylinder,
surface pressure distribution for in viscid flow and boundary layer flow.

From the data collected during this experiment, the coefficient of pressure can be calculated
and compared to other coefficient of pressure at the various locations on the circumference of the
cylinder. The pressure coefficient is a dimensionless number which describes the relative
pressures throughout a flow field in fluid dynamics. The pressure coefficient is used
in aerodynamics and hydrodynamics. Every point in a fluid flow field has its own unique pressure
coefficient, Cp.

6
 The pressure coefficient is a parameter for studying the flow of incompressible fluids such
as water, and also the low-speed flow of compressible fluids such as air. The relationship between
the dimensionless coefficient and the dimensional numbers is:
𝑷 − 𝑷∞ 𝑷 − 𝑷∞
𝑪𝑷 = 𝟏 =
⁄ 𝟐𝝆𝑽𝟐 𝑷𝟎 − 𝑷∞

Where;

𝑷 is the static pressure at the point at which pressure coefficient is being evaluated

𝑷∞ is the static pressure in the free stream (i.e. remote from any disturbance)

𝑷𝟎 is the stagnation pressure in the free stream (i.e. remote from any disturbance)

𝝆 is the free stream fluid density (Air at sea level and 15 °C is 1.225𝐾𝑔⁄𝑚3 )

𝑽 is the free stream velocity of the fluid or the velocity of the body through the fluid

7
3.0 OBJECTIVES
The objective of this experiment is to study the pressure profile and flow characteristics for
flow around a circular cylinder.

8
4.0 Procedure

1. Switched on the wind tunnel and run it by pressing run button.

2. Set the velocity to 10 m/s by turning the controller speed knob in clockwise direction.
3. Let the velocity reading to stable for 1 minutes.
4. Record the multi-tube manometer readings for 0º to 180º angle.
5. Repeat steps 2 to 4 with 20 m/s velocity.

9
Apparatus

Figure 3. Wind Tunnel

Figure 4. Circular Cylinder with

Holes

10
Figure 5. Multi-tube Manometer

Figure 6. Controller Speed

11
5.0 RESULTS
Test 1, Velocity 10 m/s

Manometer height (tube 16), h0 +2 (348 mm)

Initial water height level 350 mm

Location Angle, Manometer h h-h0 P-P0 Cp Cp cos ϴ

ϴ height (mm) (mm) (Pa)
(mm)
1. 0 349 +1 -1 -9.781 -1.96 x 10-4 -1.96 x 10-4

2. 15 348 +2 0 0 0 0

3. 30 355 -5 -7 -68.463 -1.73 x 10-3 -1.50 x 10-3

4. 45 358 -8 -10 -97.806 -1.96 x 10-3 -1.39 x 10-3

5. 60 357 -7 -9 -88.025 -1.77 x 10-3 -8.85 x 10-4

6. 75 358 -8 -10 -97.806 -1.96 x 10-3 -5.07 x 10-4

7. 90 356 -6 -8 -78.245 -1.57 x 10-3 0

8. 105 357 -7 -9 -88.025 -1.77 x 10-3 4.58 x 10-4

9. 120 357 -7 -9 -88.025 -1.77 x 10-3 8.85 x 10-4

10. 135 357 -7 -9 -88.025 -1.77 x 10-3 1.25 x 10-3

11. 150 357 -7 -9 -88.025 -1.77 x 10-3 1.53 x 10-3

12. 165 356 -6 -8 -78.245 -1.57 x 10-3 1.51 x 10-3

13. 180 350 0 -2 -19.566 -3.92 x 10-3 3.92 x 10-3

12
 Coefficient of Pressure VS Location of the
cylinder

Coefficient of Pressure 0.00E+00

-1.00E-03

-2.00E-03

-3.00E-03

-4.00E-03

-5.00E-03
0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180
Location, ϴ

Figure 7: Test 1 Line Chart

13
 Test 2, Velocity 20 m/s

Manometer height (tube 16), h0 +2 (348 mm)

Initial water height level 350 mm

Location Angle, Manometer h h-h0 P-P0 Cp Cp cos ϴ

ϴ height (mm) (mm) (Pa)
(mm)
1. 0 346 +4 +2 19.56 9.81 x 10-5 9.81 x 10-5

2. 15 347 +3 +1 9.78 4.90 x 10-5 4.74 x 10-5

3. 30 372 -22 -24 -234.73 -1.18 x 10-3 -1.02 x 10-3

4. 45 374 -24 -26 -254.29 -1.28 x 10-3 -9.05 x 10-4

5. 60 379 -29 -31 -303.20 -1.52 x10-3 -7.60 x 10-4

6. 75 379 -29 -31 -303.20 -1.52 x 10-3 -3.93 x 10-4

7. 90 378 -28 -30 -293.42 -1.47 x 10-3 0

8. 105 382 -32 -34 -332.54 -1.67 x 10-3 4.32 x 10-4

9. 120 377 -27 -29 -283.63 -1.42 x 10-3 7.10 x 10-4

10. 135 382 -32 -34 -332.54 -1.67 x 10-3 1.18 x 10-3

11. 150 380 -30 -32 -312.98 -1.57 x 10-3 1.36 x 10-3

12. 165 381 -31 -33 -322.76 -1.62 x 10-3 1.56 x 10-3

13. 180 358 -8 -10 -97.806 -4.91 x 10-4 4.91 x 10-4

14
 Coefficient of Pressure VS Location of the
cylinder
2.00E-04
Coefficient of Pressure 0.00E+00
-2.00E-04
-4.00E-04
-6.00E-04
-8.00E-04
-1.00E-03
-1.20E-03
-1.40E-03
-1.60E-03
-1.80E-03
0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180
Location, ϴ

Figure 8: Test 2 Line Chart

Coefficient of Pressure VS Location of the

cylinder
5.00E-04
0.00E+00
Coefficient of Pressure

-5.00E-04
-1.00E-03
-1.50E-03
-2.00E-03
-2.50E-03 Test 1, V=10m/s
-3.00E-03 Test 2, V=20m/s
-3.50E-03
-4.00E-03
-4.50E-03
0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105120135150165180
Location, ϴ

Figure 9: Test 3 Line Chart

15
SAMPLE CALCULATION

(Test 1):
V= 10m/s
h0 = 348 mm
Location of the cylinder, ϴ = 0°
Density of water = 997 kg/m3

Manometer height differences, h-ho (mm):

h-ho = 349 mm – 348 mm
= 1 mm / 0.001 m

The Pressure Value, P (Pa):

𝑘𝑔
𝜌𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑑 = 997
𝑚3
𝑚
𝑔 = 9.81
𝑠2

𝑃 = 𝜌𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑔ℎ

= (997)(9.81)(0.349)

= 3413.4 𝑃𝑎

The Pressure Differences, P-Po (Pa):

P – P0 = pgH
= (997) (9.81) (-0.001)
= -9.781 Pa

The coefficient Pressure, Cp:

𝑃 − 𝑃ₒ
𝐶𝑝 =
1⁄ 𝜌𝑉2
2
16
Where;
P = Pressure
𝜌 = density of water (997 kg/m3)
V = Velocity of air (10m/s)

𝑃 − 𝑃ₒ
𝐶𝑝 =
1⁄ 𝜌𝑉2
2
−15.38
𝐶𝑝 =
1⁄ (997)(10)2
2
𝐶𝑝 = −1.96 x 10^ − 4

At 𝜽 = 𝟎𝒐, 𝑪𝑷 𝐜𝐨𝐬 𝜽

𝐶𝑃 cos 𝜃 = (−1.96 x 10^ − 4) cos 00

= −1.96 x 10^ − 4

(Test 2):
V= 20m/s
ho = 348 mm
Location of the cylinder, ϴ = 0°

Manometer height Differences, h-ho (mm):

h-ho = 346 mm – 348 mm
= -2 mm / -0.002

The Pressure Value, P (Pa):

𝑘𝑔
𝜌𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑑 = 997
𝑚3
𝑚
𝑔 = 9.81
𝑠2

17
𝑃 = 𝜌𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑔ℎ

= (997)(9.81)(0.346)

= 3384.07 𝑃𝑎

The Pressure Differences, P-Po (Pa):

P – P0 = pgH
= (997) (9.81) (0.002)
= 19.56 Pa

The coefficient Pressure, Cp:

𝑃 − 𝑃ₒ
𝐶𝑝 =
1⁄ 𝜌𝑉2
2
Where;
P = Pressure
𝜌 = density of water (997 kg/m3)
V = Velocity of air (20m/s)

𝑃 − 𝑃ₒ
𝐶𝑝 =
1⁄ 𝜌𝑉2
2
19.56
𝐶𝑝 =
1⁄ (997)(20)2
2
𝐶𝑝 = 9.81 x 10-5

At 𝜽 = 𝟎𝒐, 𝑪𝑷 𝐜𝐨𝐬 𝜽

𝐶𝑃 cos 𝜃 = (9.81 x 10 − 5) cos 00

= 9.81 x 10 − 5

18
6.0 DISCUSSION
MUHAMMAD IKHMAL HIJJAZ BIN MOHD JASMI
2019705053
EMD5M4A

DISCUSSION
It is understood from this experiment that the object of this experiment was primarily
to understand and establish the pressure profile and flow properties for flowing around a
circular ring. The angles and heights were the only variables reported in the table in this
experiment, and the rest were determined from the data obtained. The pressure differential
would be simple to measure by using the disparity between heights of the manometer.
Measurements of the coefficient of static pressure on the cylinder surface were used to calculate
the curve in the graph above which will be addressed later.

Statistics are seen in figures displaying increasing variables and parameters in test 1
and test 2, respectively. The angle can be calculated in the table shown by the positions
tabulated from 00 to 180o..By reading the multi-tube manometer increasing pressure taping
location corresponding to the pressure calculation can be obtained. In this experiment the fluid
density was given at 997 kg / m3. And the pressure coefficient will then be measured in the
existence of velocity by averaging the distance, the gap in the taping location and the gravity
factor at sea level. Therefore, the angle reported can easily be used to calculate the.

This experiment was carried out using two separate velocities at 10 m/s and 20 m/s,
respectively. The set to 350 mm and 348 mm, however. The table was completed based on the
measured results, and a graph was created for both experiments. The variables used for y-axis
in the graph are the pressure coefficient, Cp where the position on cylinder diameter is defined
for the x-axis.

The coordinate system used as seen in plotted maps, where the Cp begins with a
decrease of 0o to 30o in the first study. The curve was then expanded quickly all the way from
30o to 80o at a pace of 10 m/s. Until gradually rising in the region of 90 o to 100o, the pressure
coefficient was again slowly decreasing. The manner of fluctuation in this state which occur
due to the unstable red fluid in the manometer which prevents us from getting accurate data
from the manometer.

19
 In the second study, the curve line was found to be smoother relative to the first study,
although it initially had a small decrease as low as Cp = -1.96x10-4 until the pressure coefficient
began to rise at 300 position of the cylinder circumference. It is assumed that due to the steady
manometer fluid at the manometer, the smooth speed of the curve can occur when the system
has completely heated up, thereby loading its maximum power. So, cp achieved its average
coefficient of pressure of 3.92x10-3.

20
CONCLUSION

From the analysis, we can infer that, according to positions, the coefficient pressure
rises but at a certain stage it gets reduced and is steady at the end. And from the equation we
can see the line angle rise is directly proportional to the pressure coefficient. The velocity does
not offer the coefficient pressure value major results.

21
MUHAMMAD AZRI FIKRI BIN ARBAIN

2019564353

Discussion

From the results, it shows that the coefficient of pressure could be calculated by using
standard equation and the data taken from the experiment. The coefficient of pressure is
calculated for both test where two different velocity is used which is 10 and 20 m/s. As we
know, if the height value is positive it means there is a pressure and negative indicating suction.
For test 1 where 10 m/s velocity is used, the higher the manometer height, the bigger the
coefficient of pressure. For example, at 358 mm manometer height, the value of coefficient of
pressure is -1.96x10-3 while at 349 mm manometer height the value of coefficient of pressure
is -1.96x10-4.

The value of coefficient of pressure for test 2 is much bigger than value for test 1 due
to bigger value of velocity is used. The relation can be observed from the coefficient of pressure
versus location of the cylinder graph that have been plotted. From the graph, it shows that the
value of coefficient of pressure is significantly different especially at 180º angle. For test 1 the
value of coefficient of pressure at 180º is -3.92x10-3 while for test 2 the value is -491x10-4.

The result for this experiment may slightly different from published data due to some
error that may occur during the experiment. Error that must be taken precaution step is parallax
error especially during recording the measurement. This happen due to apparatus that been
used in this experiment is multi-tube manometer.

22
Conclusion

As a conclusion, we can say that the objective of this study has been achieved which is
to measure the coefficient of pressure over a range of velocities in circular cylinder. What can
be observed from this study is the higher the manometer height, the bigger the coefficient of
pressure. Also, we can conclude that the higher velocity used, the higher the coefficient of
pressure. Precaution that can be taken during the experiment in order to minimize the error is
eyes must be perpendicular to the scale when taking the manometer reading. This study is very
important in engineering sector especially for piping works.

23
Muhammad Harith Bin Mohd Zahid

2019564199

DISCUSSION

The experiment is being proceeed to determine the characterisitic of movement flow for certain
pressure profile based on circular cylinder. To gather the pressure that acting on the cylinder it
will act inside the closed wind tunnel circuit. The position for the cylinder will be vertically
proportional with the wind flow that comes in for about 11 pressure tapping inside the angular
interval of 15 degrees. Two different type of speed hase been used for experiment which is
20m/s and 10 m/s. All the result data will be tabulated on the graph data to observe the process..

Based on the data that has been gathered, the initial angle is 0° and end at 150°. The
pressure coefficient in being determined on the graph by y-axis, while the x-axis is shown the
location point for cylinder circumference. At test 1, the graph is shown the increasing for the
curve until 15° before it start to shown fluctuate behavior till 45°. After that, the curve start to
increase in steady state until 165 degrees angle before it decrease down to 180°. Next, the test
2 shown the curve is bending down thoroughly until 105°. Then it start to rapidly rise till 120
degrees angle before it start to fluctuate again to 165 degrees. The final end for the graph is
different with test 1 where it rise when reach 180 degrees angle. These two test shown the
differential of result when it goes throughout the process until it reaches the end point for the
comparison. It shown major different between test 1 and test 2 for at point angle of 180 degrees.
Due to unstable state for the red fluid it cause the graph to fluctuate for both test based on
manometer reader which reduce the accuracy for data taken. Thus, it determined the maximum
and minimum measurement data for coefficient of pressure for these two test velocity value.
For 10 m/s were taken value of 0 and -3.92 x 10-3 respectively. Then for 20 m/s were given is
9.81 x 10-5 and -4.91 x 10-4 respectively.

Throughout the experiment, the value result taken might be not accurate with theoretical
value due to involvement of certain natural occur. The parallax error is being found on the first
experiment because of the data might being calculated with wrong formula mathematic
procedures. Plus, human eye might give a high error due to not perpendicular or the eye sight
with reader apparatus. In the same time, the unstable fluid inside the manometer also causing
the reading value is hard to reach the most efficiency value due to apparatus error.

24
CONCLUSION

For the conclusion, the objective experiment is achieved through the experiment and is satisfy
enough to be observe with theoretical value. All procedure and step was carefully being done
and the data has beem plot on the graph. For the error occur, we can reduce it by doing several
inspection and maintenance on the machine and apparatus to reduce the error percentage during
the experiment process. We also can conclude that, if the velocity of air is increase, the drag
force also will increase to some point

25
Muhammad Fatihin Bin Mohani
2019528189

DISCUSSION

The experiment conducted is to analyze the flow characteristics for flow around a circular cylinder
and its pressure profile. The cylinder in a closed wind tunnel circuit will be gather the pressure
distribution acting on it. The cylinder is vertically placed to the incoming flow with 11 pressure
tapping at angular interval of 15°. There are two different speeds used which are 10 m/s and 20
m/s. Then the data was tabulated and plotted into line graph. The value then used to determine the
curve of graph against the location of the cylinder.

Based on the data obtained, the angle was starting from 0° to 150°. The graph determined
the y-axis as the pressure coefficient, Cp and x-axis represented as the location on the
circumference of the cylinder. From Test 1, the graph shown that the curve increase slightly to 15°
before it fluctuated to 45°. Then the curve was increase steadily until 165° before it fall down to
180°. For the Test 2, the curve was decrease thoroughly to 105°. Then the curve slightly rise to
120° before it decrease again to 165°. The end of the curve is different from Test 1 where it increase
to 180°. Furthermore, by comparing two graph it shown there are minor differences between these
two until it reach the last angle. There are major difference between Test 1 and Test 2 for angle of
180° . The fluctuation of both curves may happen due to the unstable red fluid in the manometer
which prevent to get accurate data. Hence, it can be measure that the maximum and minimum
coefficient of pressure for both velocity. For 10 m/s were 0 and -3.92 x 10-3 respectively. Then for
20 m/s were 9.81 x 10-5 and -4.91 x 10-4 respectively.

The experimental reading taken might not accurate as theoretical value as there are some
error in the experiment. The first experiment founded was involves of parallax error where the data
is calculated with wrong formulae or silly mathematic mistakes. Next, the eyes of person might
not perpendicular to the reading that causes inaccurate of data. Furthermore, the apparatus error
might occur where there is unstable of fluid in manometer thus hard to take the exact value. It can
be solve by calibrate and maintain the apparatus frequently.

26
CONCLUSION

In the nutshell, the experiment objective to study the pressure profile and flow
characteristics for flow around a circular cylinder was successful done. All the procedure was
completely understand and the value from calculation was plotted into the graph. In the end, it can
be learned that if the air velocity increases, the drag force also will increases. As the velocity rose
up, the coefficient of pressure decrease until it meet a point and then continue with steady value
with no major fluctuation.

27
MUHAMMAD HAYYUL QAYYUM BIN MOHD HALIM
2019704561
Discussion
Objective of the experiment is to measure the drag coefficient over velocities of a range. It used
a wind tunnel to find the data needed for the calculation. It used 2 different of velocity that are
20m/s and 10 m/s.

Each velocity encounter 13 different angle and manometer height. For test first graph, the value
of Cp increases up to 15 ˚C. Then it drops until 45 ˚C. The value then increases slightly until
165 ˚C then drop heavily to 180 ˚C.

For test second graph, the value of Cp drops from 0 ˚C to 15 ˚C. Then it decreases heavily until
105 ˚C. After that the value increase steadily until 165 ˚C before it rose up at 180 ˚C.

The major different as we can see at 180 ˚C. This high different might due to error reading
during the experiment. The error must be taken consider due to the high different between this
2-test graph. The higher the height of manometer, the higher the pressure of coefficient.

Conclusion

Based on the result collected and calculated, the experiment has been completely done.
Different velocity used for the experiment, different value of Cp we will get. The higher value
of Cp is due to higher value of velocity.

28
7.0 REFERENCES
1. Bertin J.J., 2002, Aerodynamics for Engineers , 4th edition, Prentice Hall.
2. Panton R.L., 2005, Incompressible Flow, Wiley.
3. von Kármán T., 1963, Aerodynamics, McGraw-Hill, pp. 68-72, 85.
4. van Dyke M., 1982, An Album of Fluid Motion, Parabolic Press, pp. 28-31.

29
APPENDICES

30
 DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION
by Muhammad Ikhmal Hijjaz bin Mohd Jasmi 8A

Submission date: 06-Aug-2020 11:50PM (UTC+0800)

Submission ID: 1366599316
File name: discussion_conclusion_lab_circular_flow.docx (14.27K)
Word count: 509

31
Character count: 2515

32
33
34
35
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
ORIGINALITY REPORT

0 %
SIMILARITY INDEX
0%
INTERNET SOURCES
0%
PUBLICATIONS
0%
STUDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

Exclude quotes On Exclude matches < 15 words

Exclude bibliography On

36
 Flow Pass a Circular Cylinder
by 4A MUHAMMAD AZRI FIKRI BIN ARBAIN

Submission date: 07-Aug-2020 05:53AM (UTC+0800)

Submission ID: 1366696421
File name: Discussion_Flow_Pass.pdf (11.28K)
Word count: 359

37
Character count: 1755

38
39
40
Flow Pass a Circular Cylinder
ORIGINALITY REPORT

10 %
SIMILARITY INDEX
0%
INTERNET SOURCES
0%
PUBLICATIONS
10%
STUDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to Universiti Teknologi MARA

1 Student Paper 6%
Submitted to University of Bristol
2 Student Paper 4%

Exclude quotes On Exclude matches < 15 words

Exclude bibliography On

41
 Discussion and Conclusion
by MUHAMMAD HARITH BIN MOHD ZAHID 5A

Submission date: 07-Aug-2020 10:12AM (UTC+0800)

Submission ID: 1366770962
File name: Discussion_and_Conclusion_Cylinder.docx (13.4K)
Word count: 529

42
Character count: 2538

43
44
45
Discussion and Conclusion
ORIGINALITY REPORT

0 %
SIMILARITY INDEX
0%
INTERNET SOURCES
0%
PUBLICATIONS
0%
STUDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

Exclude quotes On Exclude matches < 15 words

Exclude bibliography On

46
 Flow Pass A Circular Cylinder
Discussion & Conclusion
by 4A MUHAMMAD FATIHIN BIN MOHANI

Submission date: 07-Aug-2020 03:11AM (UTC+0800)

Submission ID: 1366653339
File name: Discussion_Flow_Pass_A_Circular_Cylinder.docx (13.01K)
Word count: 472

47
Character count: 2303

48
49
50
Flow Pass A Circular Cylinder Discussion & Conclusion
ORIGINALITY REPORT

13 %
SIMILARITY INDEX
6%
INTERNET SOURCES
0%
PUBLICATIONS
11%
STUDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to Eastern Mediterranean University

1 Student Paper 8%
www.scribd.com
2 Internet Source 5%

Exclude quotes On Exclude matches < 15 words

Exclude bibliography On

51
 Discussion and Conclusion
(2019704561 M.Hayyul Qayyum)
by 4A MUHAMMAD HAYYUL QAYYUM BIN MOHD HALIM

Submission date: 07-Aug-2020 09:16AM (UTC+0800)

Submission ID: 1366751518
File name: Discussion_and_Conclusion.pdf (63.71K)
Word count: 210

52
Character count: 948

53
54
Discussion and Conclusion (2019704561 M.Hayyul Qayyum)
ORIGINALITY REPORT

0 %
SIMILARITY INDEX
0%
INTERNET SOURCES
0%
PUBLICATIONS
0%
STUDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

Exclude quotes On Exclude matches < 15 words

Exclude bibliography On

55
 Thermalfluid Lab – MEC 554 / LSRC / SCA Rev. 01-2017

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA FACULTY

OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

Program : Bachelor of Engineering (Hons.) Mechanical

Course : Thermalfluids Lab
Course Code : MEC 554
Lecturer/Tutor Name : Ahmad
Hussein Abdul Hamid
Group :EMD5A4 (4)
Lab Report

Experiment’s Tittle

Flow Pass a Circular Cylinder

Bil Student Name Student ID Signature

1.
MUHAMMAD AZRI FIKRI BIN 2019564353
ARBAIN
MUHAMMAD HARITH BIN MOHD 2019564199
2.
ZAHID
3. MUHAMMAD FATIHIN BIN MOHANI 2019528189

4. MUHAMMAD HAYYUL QAYYUM 2019704561

BIN MOHD HALIM
5.
MUHAMMAD IKHMAL HIJJAZ BIN 2019705053
MOHD JASMI

Lab Session : 4 OGOS 2020 Approved by:

(Date)

Submission of Report : 7 OGOS 2020 Received by:

(Date)

56