Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Classification of Photovoltaic Power Systems: Presentation
Classification of Photovoltaic Power Systems: Presentation
2017
c
1 Conventional Classification
2 Classification by MPPT granularity level
3 Centralized maximum power point tracking (CMPPT)
CMPPT with galvanic isolation
CMPPT without galvanic isolation
PV array mismatch
Monitoring CMPPT systems
4 Distributed maximum power point tracking (DMPPT)
DMPPT at string level
DMPPT at module level
DMPPT at submodule level
DMPPT at PV cell level
5 Summary
The parallel connections of PV strings forms the subarray and the full array for
high power capacity.
Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) is a control algorithm that is
commonly utilized in all PV power systems for the highest power output
regardless of the variation in environmental conditions.
Systems are classified by the granularity level at which the function of MPPT
is applied.
The centralized MPPT (CMMPT) system is defined when the MPPT function can
only be operated by the centralized inverter at the subarray or the array level.
The distributed MPPT (DMMPT) system is defined when the MPPT function can
be operated by the finer granularity than the subarray level.
DMPPT includes the MPPT applied for the string, module, submodule, and
cell levels.
Photovoltaic Power System: Modelling, Design, and Control 4 / 27
Centralized maximum power point tracking
Module output characteristics can be different even though they are the same
model and manufactured by the same date.
PV module manufacturers always give the power tolerance in the datasheets.
Direct mismatch loss is expected when they are connected in series.
1.5
22
20
18
16
PPV (W)
IPV (W)
1 14
12
I−V of module #1 10 P−V of module #1
MPP of module #1 MPP of module #1
I−V of module #2 8 P−V of module #2
MPP of module #2 MPP of module #2
0.5 6
10 15 20 10 15 20
VPV (V) VPV (V)
Photovoltaic Power System: Modelling, Design, and Control 8 / 27
Mismatch resulted from partial shading
20
18
(W)
(W)
1 16
PV
PV
P
P
I−V of module #1 14 P−V of module #1
MPP of module #1 MPP of module #1
I−V of module #2 12 P−V of module #2
MPP of module #2 MPP of module #2
0.5 10
10 15 20 10 15 20
VPV (V) VPV (V)
Photovoltaic Power System: Modelling, Design, and Control 9 / 27
More loss due to the series connection
Two power peaks appears,but none can represent the true available power
that is the sum of the individual maximum power.
Direct loss is from the shading, counted for 14%.
Additional loss is from the series connection of two modules, counted for 8%.
Total loss (22 %) can be realized for the simple partial shading case.
1.5 35
30
PPV (W)
PPV (W)
25
1
20
15
I−V of series connection I−V of series connection
MPP of series connection MPP of series connection
0.5 10
10 20 30 40 10 20 30 40
VPV (V) VPV (V)
Photovoltaic Power System: Modelling, Design, and Control 10 / 27
wireless communication technologies used for monitoring in three levels
Two configurations
Common AC link for multiple string inverters to perform DC/AC conversion
Common DC link for multiple string converter to perform DC/DC conversion
Parallel
configuration
High step-up
voltage conversion
Highly modular
structure for AC grid
connection
Challenge for high
efficiency
Common topologies
Steady DC link
voltage
Fluctuating DC
link voltage
Parallel
configuration
High step-up
voltage of DC/DC
conversion
Highly modular
structure for DC
grid connection
For AC grid, a
centralized DC/AC
inverter required.
Challenge for high
efficiency
Since the output of subIPDPPs share the common ground, galvanic isolation
is required.
Each submodule is integrated in parallel with a dedicated subIPDPP.
Complex wiring in outdoor condition to process mismatch current
Coordination and communication among SubMIPDPPs
Implementation can be costly due to the galvanic isolation requirement.