Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Complaint Against Elevations RTC
Complaint Against Elevations RTC
Cutt (5937)
EISENBERG GILCHRIST & CUTT
900 Parkside Tower
215 South State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Telephone: (801) 366-9100
Facsimile: (801) 350-0065
Plaintiff, (TIER 3)
vs.
Case No. _________________
KENNETH SIO and SYRACUSE RTC,
LLC, d/b/a ELEVATIONS RTC, Judge: ___________________
Defendants.
Plaintiff Zelda Hutcheon, by and through counsel, hereby complains against Defendants
4. The events that give rise to this Complaint took place in Davis County, Utah.
5. The Parties have complied with the pre-litigation requirements of the Utah Health
6. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Utah Code § 78A-5-102.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
8. Defendant Syracuse RTC, LLC (“Syracuse”) owns and operates Elevations RTC
(“Elevations”), a residential treatment center for “troubled teens” located in Syracuse, Utah.
9. At all relevant times, Defendant Kenneth Sio (“Sio”) was a staff member and
10. Plaintiff was admitted as a patient to Elevations on June 15, 2015. Plaintiff was
11. The staff at Elevations lacked the proper knowledge, training and experience to
care for Plaintiff in a safe and effective manner. As a result, Plaintiff was repeatedly subjected to
physical restraints and other physically and emotionally abusive treatment. Elevations also
failed to provide Plaintiff with appropriate psychiatric care and medication management.
12. On October 6, 2015, Sio was working as a staff member at Elevations. Sio
violently grabbed Plaintiff and slammed her to the floor. As a result, Zelda sustained a traumatic
brain injury, skull fracture, and permanent injury to her fourth cranial nerve resulting in
nausea, vomiting and double vision), Defendants failed to diagnose or treat Plaintiff’s injuries for
2
14. Defendants also failed to document the incident in which Sio injured Plaintiff.
15. It was not until after Plaintiff was diagnosed with a brain injury and admitted to
the hospital that Defendants created a report on the incident involving Sio, and the report is
Syracuse and Elevations also instructed its employees not to report or discuss the incident
involving Sio.
16. As a result of her injuries, Plaintiff has suffered, and will continue to suffer,
economic damages including, without limitation, past and future medical and care expenses, loss
of wages, loss of earning capacity, and loss of the ability to provide household services.
17. Plaintiff has also suffered, and will continue to suffer, non-economic damages
resulting from physical and emotional pain and disability, and loss of the enjoyment of life.
18. Sio owed a duty of care to Plaintiff, including a duty to comply with the standard
D. Failing to report that Plaintiff hit her head and ensure that she received
proper evaluation and treatment.
3
20. Sio’s conduct constituted negligence which was the proximate cause of Plaintiff’s
21. Sio was an employee of Syracuse and Elevations and was acting in the course and
22. Syracuse and Elevations are liable for Sio’s negligence under the doctrine of
respondeat superior.
23. Syracuse and Elevations owed a duty to exercise reasonable care in the hiring and
retention of employees, including Sio. This duty was especially important with respect to staff
members like Sio who would be working around minors who were particularly vulnerable due to
24. Syracuse and Elevations’ duty included, without limitation, performing complete
background checks and monitoring employees to ensure that they were appropriately suited to
25. Syracuse and Elevations breached their duties in hiring and retaining Sio. A
competent assessment of Sio would have revealed that he was not appropriately suited to work
26. Syracuse and Elevations’ breaches constituted negligence which was a proximate
4
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(Negligence – Syracuse and Elevations)
27. Syracuse and Elevations owed a duty to comply with the standard of care
28. Syracuse and Elevations breached their duties, without limitation, as follows:
management to Plaintiff;
Plaintiff;
G. Failing to provide Plaintiff was medical care for at least six days despite
and reports.
29. Syracuse and Elevations’ breaches constituted negligence which was a proximate
5
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
d. For costs of suit, pre- and post-judgment interest, and attorneys’ fees as
e. For such further relief as the court deems just and proper.
TIER DESIGNATION
Pursuant to Utah Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a) and 26(c)(3), this matter falls under Tier 3
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff hereby requests a trial by jury on all issues that may be tried to a jury.