Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Do You Know
What Do You Know
{ai}'~'1p~f'
T-
J
.f.~':";"
".rfV{e, H9.~SJ
-.~.'..-~
~. 1Á,,"~ p,'fh :Motr-~'4 ~ 0'0 .J!rrYMo&ahor>.&--
~~ ; eo/ ~
...
Aduocp- i-e:
~/
sions about what competence must be like. However, they try to disregard performanee factors (the
inevitable speeeh errors, ineomplete utteranees, and so on) and foeus on consistent pattems in their
study of linguistie competence. .
So what are some of the things you know about your language? Here is a brief survey.
Phonetics
•...
Part of your linguistic competence has to do with your knowledge of the sounds of your language.
You know how to produee them though you may have never had to really think about the mechanics
of doing 50, Imagine, for instance, that you are trying to describe to someone else how the first sound
in the word' ihe is pronouneed (the, by the way, contains only two sounds). Or suppose you had to ex-
plain the diHerenees between the vowels in the words bat, beai, and boot. Youhave probably been pro-
ducing these sounds for years withaut having to think twiee about them. When you attempt to leam
another language, you become acutely aware that other languages have sounds that English does not
have-for example, French r, French ar Spanish p, the German ü and o vowels, the ch of German
(which has more than a single pronuneiation), or the clieks of some languages of África,such as Xhosa
and Zulu.
))8
- •• --
.-i
"
'f
Wlzat Do You Knoto When You Know a Language?
Phonology
-, File 1.4
~ Not only ean yau produce and perceive the sounds of your language, yau knaw how these sounds
1~
~,
work together as a system. For instance, you know what sequenees of sounds are possible in different
positions. In wards like ptomaine ar Ftolemy English speakers usually omit the p, because pt is nat a
cambinatian that ean aeeur at the beginning of English words. There is nothing inherently difficult
J. about this cluster, hawever; it oeeurs non-initially in many English words, sueh as apt, captive, and
l:
~ tapped, and some languages (such as Greek) do allow pt clusters to aeeur ward-initially.
1>
An even more dramatie demanstration of yaur inherent knawledge of possíble saund se-
f quenees appears when yau consider Jumbles and Scrambles from the newspapers. (These are aetually
eoncemed with unserambling letters, not sounds, but the same principles apply.) For example, gisnt
has five letters. There are 5! (5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 = 120)possible arrangements of these letters, When you do
a [umble, hawever, you rarely eansider many of the possibilities: yau've probably a1ready grouped n
and g as ng, put the one vowel somewhere in themiddle, and put s and t tagether in st. Yau don't even
think of beginning words with ng, gt, ar gs or ending them with gnt ar tn, ar even gn [this does oeeur,
but it's rare and pranauneed as n). Your inherent knowledge of what is a possible sequenee of sounds
, in the English language enables you to eliminate these possibilities.
i\.....J
Your knawledge of phonology also allows you to make substifutions for uníamiliar sounds.
Consider the sounds diseussed earlier that are foreign to an English speaker. When we try to pro-
nounce words containing sueh sounds, we usually replaee them with saunds from our own language.
For instanee, English speakers often pronounce the German name Bach with a final k sound and re-
place the ü in German grün 'green' with the same vowel as in English moon. Or English speakers may
ignore differences that are important in other languages but not in English, sueh as the tones in Thai
and the Chinese languages.
Morphology
'v
,) For the most part, speech eonsists of a eontinuous stream of sound with few pauses between words.
Speakers, however, have little trouble breaking utteranees down into the words that make them up.
Thus an English speaker ean easily analyze (a) as containing the sequenee of words in (b), and a Welsh
speaker ean just as easily break (e) down into (d) (which means the same thing as (bj].
(a) Ihavetogohomeearlytoday.
(b) I have to gohome early today.
(c) Rhaidimifyndadre'ngynnarheddiw.
(d) Rhaid i mi fynd adre'n gynnar heddiw.
Vou also know how ta break individual words down into smaller parts that have a meaning or
some other function, and yau know howto create words by combining these smaller parts. For in-
stance, how many parts are there to the words desk, oranges, and unbelievability? Can you produee an
example af a word you've never heard or read before? You can certainly understand newly eomposed
words-for example, uncoffeelike. As a speaker of some language, you know which sueh combinations
are possible and which ones aren't. Compare baka: with the nonword "erbake, ar nicely with *bookly (the
"*" is used to mark that something is ungrammatieal-in this case, that it is not a possíble ward). What
is wrong with these starred words?
:j) 9
1
Syntax
I Introductíon
T
I
I
!
Sentences (a) and (b) are ungrammatical; (a) is just nonsense and (b) violates the morphological condi-
tion imposed by modals that their verb complements appear in "bare"form. Sentences '(e) and (d) are
grammatieal, and they are also syntaetically related to each other. Why is (d) grammatical but (e) not?
Semantics
Part of yaur linguistic eompetenee has to do with your ability to determine the meaning of sentences.
Your competenee also allows you to determine when a sentence has more than one meaning. Consider
" ) the following ambiguous sentences; what are the different meanings eaeh one ean have?
You also know when different sentences mean the same thing.
Above, (e) and (f) are synonymaus sentences, as are (g) and (h). In addition, (g) and (h) are syntacti-
cally related (one ís the passiva ot the other).
Pragmatics \..
Your understanding of the meaning of sentences and larger utteranees also involves an understanding
of how the context of those utteranees influences their meaning. For instance, suppose you're a stu-
dent in a classroom; there's a lot of noise out in the hall, and the instructor says to you, "Can you dose
!J
10
•
. . ~'. ,l/l<, ,,'
- -- . --- - .-_.-._---~---- -- - ...
-.' •
-
',',
/'
,-;;,"
)f. ...
~
~.'~" , ..
. . What Do You Know When You Know a Language? File 1.4
I
the door?" Taken quite literally, this is an inquiry about your door-closing abilitíes, but you would
probably not even think of ta.king the question in that way, Instead, you would understand it as a re-
quest that you dose the doar.
~ As a speaker of a language, you subscribe to unspoken conventions that enable you to use and
interpret language correctly, though you may have never consciously become aware of these "rules."
You also know how to use language to do things-to perform what are called speech acts. In the ex-
ample above, your instructor performed the act of requesting you to elose the door. Think about the
many different ways you could use Ianguage to perform the act of, for example, finding out from
someone what time it is, requesting information fram someone, orgiving someone a waming.
Styles of Speech
You also understand the contexts or situations in which different styles of language may be used. Sup-
pose, for instance, you are explaining what it is you plan to do after college (a question most students
are relentlessly subjected to). In what ways would your answer be different if you were taIking to your
roornrnate, to your parents, or to a prospective employer at a job interviejv? Speech styIes can vary in
pronunciation, vocabulary, and syntax, among other things. (Who are "OU more líkely to use a sen-
tence like this one with? With whom is ihere a greater likelihood that one wil/ employ a sentence cf this genre?)
You are also prabably quite aware that not ali speakers of your language talk in exactly the
same way. Everyone speaks a dialect, and dialects can vary in subtle ar striking ways. You can often
draw conclusions about where a speaker is from, and you may make assumptions about their ethnic
background or socioeconomic class based on the way they talk. Justified ar not, most people have
opinions about their own speech and that of others; though they may not realize it, these opinions are
strangly influenced by nonlinguistic factors.
:, ))
'0»
11