Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

2006 IEEE COMPEL Workshop, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA, July 16-19, 2006

System Modeling and Characterization


of SiC Schottky Power Diodes
Hui Zhang, Student Member, IEEE, Leon M. Tolbert, Senior Member, IEEE, Burak Ozpineci, Senior Member, IEEE

Abstract-Most of the present models of silicon carbide (SiC) static state (forward conduction) and dynamic state (reverse
Schottky diodes are not suitable for evaluating their recovery) will be discussed respectively.
performance from a system level. The models presented in this
paper are specialized for system-level simulations. They are A. Static State
based on basic semiconductor theories and synthesis of some
models in the literature. Theoretical and experimental
characterization of SiC Schottky power diodes is also involved.

Contact
Metal
N- N+
The models describe both static and dynamic behaviors of SiC Drift Region Substrate
Schottky power diodes. Thermal effects are considered as well
for a better evaluation of power losses evaluation and cooling
system design. The models were also used to estimate the
efficiencies of Si IGBT/SiC Schottky diode hybrid inverter. To
validate the simulation, a Si IGBT/SiC Schottky diode hybrid
VFB RD RS RC
inverter and a Si IGBT inverter were built and tested.
Keywords — Silicon Carbide (SiC), Schottky diode, Fig. 1. Basic structure and equivalent circuit of Schottky power diodes.
modeling, temperature, hybrid inverter
The structure of a SiC Schottky power diode and its
equivalent circuit are shown in Fig. 1. VFB is the voltage drop
I. INTRODUCTION across the Schottky barrier; RD is the resistive voltage drop
The increasing needs for higher-voltage, more efficient, across the lightly doped drift region; RS and RC are the
and more reliable power electronic devices have given birth resistance of substrate and contact, respectively.
to the rapid progress of silicon carbide (SiC) semiconductor In a SiC Schottky power diode, the thermionic emission
technology. The advantages of SiC power devices have been process dominates in the transport of current across a metal
recognized by both the academia and industry. At present, n-type semiconductor contact. Under the forward bias
SiC Schottky power diodes, as the first commercially condition, the current flow across the Schottky barrier is
available SiC power devices, are ready to replace their Si given by [3]
counterparts in many applications in order to obtain higher
J F = CT 2 e q (VFB −φB ) / kT , (1)
efficiency, less cooling requirement, or higher compactness
of systems. where φB is the barrier height between the metal and n-type
semiconductor, T is the absolute temperature, q is the charge
Efficient device models are required to evaluate the
of an electron, k is Boltzmann’s constant, C is Richardson’s
performance of SiC Schottky diodes in different applications
constant, which is given by
and guide system design. Although several models have been
developed for SiC Schottky diodes, most of them are based 4π mk 2 q
C= , (2)
on device physics or based on experiments [1] [2]. For the h3
former, usually a number of device parameters (which are where m is the effective mass of an electron, and h is Plank’s
usually known only by designers) are required to solve the constant. For 4H-SiC, the theoretical value of Richardson’s
model, and sometimes the model itself is complicated, and constant is 146 A⋅cm-2⋅K-2 [4].
difficult to solve or time consuming. For the latter, a variety
of experiments are needed. Parameter extractions are also Solve (1) for VFB, and neglect RS and RC (because they are
involved and can be rather tough. Accordingly, these models usually small compared to RD for power devices with
are difficult to be integrated into a system simulation. It is breakdown voltage larger than 200V), then the total voltage
necessary to find some models of SiC Schottky power diodes drop across a Schottky power diode can be expressed as
specialized for system modeling. This work is to address this kT § J F ·
VF = φ B + ln¨ ¸ + J F RD , (3)
need. q © CT 2 ¹
where RD is given by
II. MODELING OF SIC SCHOTTKY POWER DIODES
4VB2
In this section, SiC Schottky diodes are characterized by RD = , (4)
ε Ec3 µn
both theoretical analysis and experiments. The models for

0-7803-9725-8/06/$20.00©2006
0-7803-9724-X/06/$20.00 ©2006IEEE.
IEEE.
199

Authorized licensed use limited to: NXP Semiconductors. Downloaded on December 19,2020 at 14:11:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
VB is the breakdown voltage; Ec is the breakdown electrical
field; µn is electron mobility, which is a function of doping 10

density Nd, electrical field E, and temperature T in the 9 From calculation


depletion layer. As paper [5], µn can be expressed as 8
From testing

µ0

Forward current IF (A)


µn = 1
, (5) 7
β β
ª §µ E· º 6
«1 + ¨ 0 ¸ » 5
« © vs ¹ »
¬ ¼ 4

µmax − µmin 3
µ0 = µmin + , (6)
( )
α
1 + Ntot N ref 2

1
vmax,600 K
vs (T ) = , (7) 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
§ T ·
1 + 0.8 ⋅ exp ¨ ¸
Forward Voltage VF (V)
© 600 ¹
Fig. 2. Forward characteristic of SiC Schottky power diode.
− Bµmax
§ T ·
µmax = Aµmax × ¨ ¸ , (8)
© 300 ¹ dVF kT § 1 ·
Rsp = = ¨ ¸ + RD . (11)
− Bµmin dJ F q © JF ¹
§ T ·
µ min = Aµmin × ¨ ¸ , (9) It indicates the dependence of this on-state specific resistance
© 300 ¹
on temperature and forward current. Moreover, as the
§ T · forward current increases, the contribution of the first
N ref = AN ref × ¨ ¸. (10) component in (11) becomes smaller and can be neglected.
© 300 ¹
This means that the on-state resistance is nearly constant
Eqs. (3)-(10) give a comprehensive description of the regardless of forward current and only changes with
static characteristics of SiC Schottky power diodes. The temperature at a relative high current region (>1A in this
coefficients involved can be found in many papers (like [6- case), which corresponds to the linear region in Fig. 2. Most
8]), and only the breakdown voltage of devices is needed to SiC Schottky power diodes operate in this region. Thus, it is
solve the equations. Using this model to estimate the forward reasonable to only consider drift region resistance RD in
characteristic of a 1200V/10A 4H-SiC Schottky power system modeling. Correspondingly, the temperature
diode, a good match between the test and the calculation dependence of the on-state resistance is determined by the
results is obtained as shown as Fig. 2. The parameters used change of µn with temperature.
in the calculation are listed in Table I. Fig. 3 compares simulation results of the on-state
Differentiation of Eq. (3) with respect to JF yields the on- resistance of several commercially available SiC Schottky
state specific resistance of a Schottky power diode: diodes to the experimental results (from datasheet [10-12]) at

0.4
TABLE I. PARAMETERS USED IN SIMULATION
Simulation
Property 4H-SiC 0.35 Experiment
Breakdown electric field, Ec (kV/cm) 2200 CSD05120
0.3
Relative dielectric constant, ε 10.1
Doping coefficient of µ , α
Resistance (ohm)

0.76[7] 0.25
Electric field coefficient of µ , β 1[7] CSD10120
0.2
Coefficient of µ max , Aµ max
950[7[
Coefficient of µ max , Bµ max
2.4[7] 0.15

Coefficient of µ min , Aµ min


40[7] 0.1
CSD10060
Coefficient of µ min , Bµ min
0.5[7] 0.05
Coefficient of N ref , AN 2×1017[7]
ref
0
Maximum saturated velocity, vs max (cm/s) 4.77×107[7] 273 323 373 423 473 523

Schottky barrier height, φB (eV) 1.25 [9] Junction Temperature (K)

Richardson’s constant, A (A⋅cm-2⋅K-2) 146 [4]


Fig. 3. On-state resistance of SiC Schottky diodes (Cree).

200

Authorized licensed use limited to: NXP Semiconductors. Downloaded on December 19,2020 at 14:11:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
different junction temperatures. Small errors were found, temperature are not considered, the reverse recovery
which indicates that these models are effective in predicting behavior of SiC Schottky diodes will be the same at any
the temperature-dependent static characteristics of SiC temperature. This is also consistent with the test results in
Schottky diodes. paper [14]. Thus, in system modeling, the influence of
temperature on the reverse recovery characteristics of SiC
B. Dynamic State Schottky diodes can be neglected.
Reverse recovery is the most important dynamic behavior
of Schottky power diodes. Since there is no minority carrier Plane of injection

injection in Schottky power diodes, the depletion layer p-type n-type p0


capacitance determines their behaviors during reverse
recovery. When a reverse biased voltage VR is applied to a
Schottky power diode, from the well-known device theory
[13], the width of its depletion layer can be calculated by

2ε (VR + φB )
wd = . (12) wd w
qN d
Fig. 5. Injected minority carrier (holes) density vs. position in
Then, the specific depletion layer capacitance can be reverse-biased p-n junction.
presented as

ε qN d ε Compared to SiC Schottky diodes, the switching loss of Si


Cd = = . (13) diodes during reverse recovery is much larger. This is
wd 2(VR + φB )
because most of the Si diodes used in power applications
As shown by (13), Cd is a strong function of VR, but is not have a p-n junction structure. For this type of diodes, besides
affected by the current flowing through it. That is to say, the the depletion layer capacitance, there is an additional
switching loss of a SiC Schottky diode mainly depends on capacitance due to the minority carrier injection under
the reverse voltage. Thus, in system modeling, it is reverse biased condition. As shown in [15], the injected
reasonable to model the reverse recovery charge of SiC minority carrier density in a reverse-biased p-n junction
Schottky diodes as a function of their reverse voltage. decreases approximately linearly through the distance w
Specifically, the reverse-recovery charge increases (shown in Fig. 5) and becomes negligible at the edge of the
approximately linear with VR0.5, and the energy loss during junction, the total charge and the capacitance due to minority
this period increases linearly with VR1.5 (see (13)). carrier injection can be therefore expressed as
To further validate this argument, a SiC Schottky diode J w
QI = F , (16)
(Cree CSD10120) was tested at different reverse voltage 2D p
with the same forward current. The turn-off characteristics
are shown in Fig. 4. As expected, the reverse-recovery ∂QI J w ε (Nd + Na )
CI = − = F . (17)
charge increased as the reverse voltage increased, and the ∂VR D p 2qN d N a (VR + φ R )
ratio of reverse-recovery charge at 315 V to that at 150 V is
1.452, which coincides with the square root of 315V/150V where Nd and Na are the doping density in n-type and p-type
(1.449). In addition, if the slight changes of ε and φB with regions, respectively. DP is the diffusion constant of holes.
In accordance with the above two equations, the
capacitance due to minority carrier injection dominates the
7
reverse recovery characteristic, especially for high current
6
level. As a result, for Si diodes, the total charge swept out
5 150V, Qrr=241nC
during turn off is more dependent on the forward current
4
Forword current (A)

than the reverse voltage. The test results reflect the same
3
facts. As shown as Fig. 6, the reverse-recovery charge of the
2
72V, Qrr=197nC tested Si diode increased quickly as the forward current
1
increased, while its variation with reverse voltage was much
0
less (see Fig. 7). Therefore, for a system with current
-1
315V, Qrr=350nC changing from time to time, the influence of the forward
-2
current on the reverse recovery of Si diodes must be
-3
-1.00E-06 -5.00E-07 0.00E+00 5.00E-07 1.00E-06
considered. This is one of the important factors that account
Time (s) for the larger power loss of Si diodes compared to SiC
Schottky diodes.
Fig. 4. Reverse recovery waveforms of the SiC Schottky diode.

201

Authorized licensed use limited to: NXP Semiconductors. Downloaded on December 19,2020 at 14:11:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
10 recovery current in diodes will be also reduced. Therefore,
5
inverter applications are one of the potential areas for SiC
Schottky diodes.
0
Forward current (A)

-5

-10

-15

-20

-25
-5E-06 -3E-06 -1E-06 1E-06 3E-06 5E-06 7E-06 9E-06
Time (s)

Fig. 6. Reverse recovery waveforms of the Si diode


at VR=150V (IR 20ETS08). Fig. 8. Si/SiC Hybrid Inverter

10
A hybrid inverter was built using the hybrid 1200V/300A
5 IGBT Module (Si IGBT and SiC Schottky diode from Cree)
as shown in Fig. 8 [19]. It was tested with an R-L load at
For war d cur r ent ( A)

0
72V different power levels and switching frequencies in order to
-5 study efficiencies of the inverter at various operating points.
- 10 315V Fig. 9 shows inverter efficiency versus its output power for
three switching frequencies at the same fundamental output
- 15
frequency of 50 Hz. As expected, the test results demonstrate
- 20 that the inverter efficiencies increase with higher output
150V power from 0.5 kW to 8.3 kW, and decreases with higher
- 25
- 5E- 06 - 3E- 06 - 1E- 06 1E- 06 3E- 06 5E- 06 7E- 06 9E- 06
switching frequency; specifically, from 5 kHz to 10 kHz, it
Ti me ( s) deceased by 1.78%, and 3.78% from 10 kHz to 15 kHz.

Fig. 7. Reverse recovery waveforms of the Si diode Fundamental Output Frequency =50Hz
100
at IF=6A (IR 20ETS08).
95
Inverter Efficiency (%)

In addition, it should be noted that DP is a function of 90

temperature and mobility of holes: 85

kT 80
Dp = µp . (18) 75
q
70 5kHz
µp is also affected by temperature. From [16], for silicon, it 65
10kHz
can be determined by 15kHz
60
−2.2
§ T · 0 2 4 6 8 10
 µ p = 495 ¨ ¸ .  (19) Output Power (kW)
© 300 ¹
Fig. 9. Inverter efficiency vs. output power
The final effect is that DP decreases and QI increases as at different switching frequencies.
temperature increases. Consequently, the power loss during
the reverse recovery of Si diodes increases with temperature, The hybrid module is in the same package with Powerex
which is another reason for the large switching power losses 1200V/300A Si IGBT/diode Module (CM300DY-24NF).
in Si diodes. The same tests were done for the Si inverter built using the
Si IGBT/diode modules. Figs. 10-11 compare the efficiency
III. TESTS OF SI/SIC HYBRID INVERTER of these two inverters at different switching frequencies. The
average power loss reduction in the hybrid inverter is
As discussed above, SiC Schottky diodes have smaller on- between 11.5% - 19.4% of the total power loss of the Si
state resistance, and better reverse recovery behaviors, which inverter.
greatly reduce the power losses in themselves. More
The efficiency of the hybrid inverter can be estimated by
importantly, if SiC Schottky diodes work as anti-parallel
using the models presented previously in this paper (for
diodes, the power loss in the switches due to the reverse

202

Authorized licensed use limited to: NXP Semiconductors. Downloaded on December 19,2020 at 14:11:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
100
100
95
95
Inverter Efficiency (%)
90 90

Efficiency (%)
85 85

80 80
Average reduction in losses:19.4%
75 75
Simulation
70 Hybrid 70
Si Test
65 65
0 3 6 9 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Output Power (kW) Load current (Arms)

Fig. 10. Efficiency of the hybrid inverter and the Si inverter. Fig. 13. Efficiency of the hybrid inverter vs. load current.
(Switching frequency=5 kHz). (Fundamental output frequency=50 Hz, Switching frequency=5 kHz)

100 100

95 95
Inverter Efficiency (%)

90 90

Efficiency (%)
85 85

80 80
Average reduction losses:11.5%
75 75
Simulation
70 Hybrid 70
Test
Si
65
65
0 3 6 9 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Load current (Arms)
Output Power (kW)
Fig. 14. Efficiency of the hybrid inverter vs. load current.
Fig. 11. Efficiency of the hybrid inverter and the Si inverter. (Fundamental output frequency=50 Hz, Switching frequency=10 kHz)
(Switching frequency=10 kHz)

100 100

95 95
Inverter Efficiency (%)

90
90
Efficiency (%)

85
85
80
80
Average reduction losses: 17% 75
75 Simulation
70
Test
70 Hybrid
65
Si
65 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
0 3 6 9 Load current (Arms)

Output Power (kW) Fig. 15. Efficiency of the hybrid inverter vs. load current.
(Fundamental output frequency=50 Hz, Switching frequency=15 kHz)
Fig. 12. Efficiency of the hybrid inverter and the Si inverter.
(Switching frequency=15 kHz)

IV. CONCLUSION
IGBT models, refer to papers [17] [18], and the parameters
used in the simulation are also from tests and datasheet). In The models presented in this paper are specialized for
Figs. 13-15, the solid lines are the efficiency obtained from system-level simulations. These models not only described
simulations (for fundamental output frequency of 50 Hz, DC static and dynamic characteristics of SiC Schottky power
voltage of 315 V), and scatter points are from test results. diodes, but also reflect their dependence on temperature.
The simulation results fit the test results very well for most Thus, they are very useful and effective to estimate the
of the test points, and only deviate at the low current level power losses of SiC Schottky diodes and to predict device
(compared to the device rating 300A). Thus, the models temperatures. The models were also used to estimate the
presented in section II are effective in inverter applications. efficiency of a Si IGBT/SiC Schottky diode hybrid inverter.

203

Authorized licensed use limited to: NXP Semiconductors. Downloaded on December 19,2020 at 14:11:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
A good match between simulation results and test results is [5] S. Selberherr, Analysis and Simulation of Semiconductor Devices,
Springer-Verlag/Wien, New York, 1984.
shown. [6] S. Kagamihara, H. Matsuura, “Parameters required to simulate electric
In addition, according to the dynamic models presented in characteristics of SiC devices for n -type 4H–SiC,” Journal of Applied
Physics, vol. 96, no.10, 15 Nov. 2004, pp. 5601-5606.
this paper, the power loss of Si diodes during turn off [7] M. Roschke, F. Schwierz, “Electron mobility models for 4H, 6H, and
increases quickly as forward current, reverse voltage, and 3C SiC,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 48, no. 7, July
temperature go up, while that of SiC Schottky diodes only 2001, pp. 1442-1447.
[8] M. Ruff, H. Mitlehner, R. Heibig, “SiC devices: physics and numerical
changes with reverse voltage. Thus, SiC Schottky diodes are simulation,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 41, no.6,
better than Si diodes as anti-paralleled diodes, especially for June 1994, pp.1040-1054.
high power and high temperature applications. This is [9] F. Roccaforte, F. L. Via, A. L. Magna, S. D. Franco, and V. Raineri,
“Silicon carbide pinch rectifiers using a dual metal Ti-Ni2Si Schottky
accordant to the tests results of the hybrid inverter and the Si barrier,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 50, no. 8,
inverter in this work. August 2003, pp.1741-1747.
[10] Datasheet of silicon carbide Schottky diode-CSD10120, www.cree.co
m/products/pdf/CSD10120.pdf
ACKNOWLEDGMENT [11] Datasheet of silicon carbide Schottky diode-CSD05120, www.cree.co
m/products/pdf/CSD05120.pdf
The authors would like to thank Charles Scozzie of Army [12] Datasheet of silicon carbide Schottky diode-CSD10060, www.cree.co
Research Lab for funding the program that made the Si/SiC m/products/pdf/CSD10060.pdf
Hybrid IGBT modules and Anant Agarwal of Cree Inc. for [13] N. Mohan, T. M. Undeland, W. P. Robbins, Power Electronics, 2nd
Edition, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1995, pp.516-517.
supplying these modules. The authors would also like to
[14] S. Hodge, “SiC power Schottky diodes in power factor correction
thank Jeremy Campbell of ORNL for his assistance with the circuits,” Cree Application Note.
experimental testing of the inverters. [15] J. R. Collard, F. Sterzer, “Current dependence of the depletion-layer
capacitance of reverse-biased P-N junctions,” Applied Physics Letters,
vol. 5, no. 8, October 1964, pp. 165 – 167.
REFERENCES [16] B. J. Baliga, Power Semiconductor Devices, PWS Publishing
[1] K. J. Tseng, S. Pan, C. F. Foo, “Issues in power diode modeling for Company, Boston, 1996, pp. 11.
circuit simulation,” Proceedings of 1997 International Conference on [17] H. Zhang, L. M. Tolbert, B. Ozpineci, M. Chinthavali, “A SiC-based
Power Electronics and Drive Systems, vol. 1, 26-29 May 1997, pp. 78- converter as a utility interface for a battery system,” IEEE Industry
84. Applications Society Annual Meeting,, October 8-12, 2006, Tampa,
[2] D. Linzen, R. W. D. Doncker, “Simulation of power losses with Florida.
MATLAB/Simulink using advanced power device models,” [18] H. Zhang, L. M. Tolbert, B. Ozpineci, M. Chinthavali, “Power losses
Proceeding of 2002 IEEE Workshop on Computers in Power and thermal modeling of 4H-SiC VJFET inverter,” IEEE Industry
electronics, 3-4 June 2002, pp. 71-75. Applications Society Annual Meeting, October 2-6, 2005, Hong Kong,
[3] B. J. Baliga, Modern Power Devices, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New China, pp. 2630-2634.
York, 1987. [19] B. Ozpineci, M. Chinthavali, A. Kashyap, L. M. Tolbert, A. Mantooth,
[4] F. Roccaforte, S. Libertino, F. Giannazzo, C. Bongiorno, F. L. Via, “A 55 kW three-phase inverter with Si IGBTs and SiC Schottky
and V. Raineri, “Ion irradiation of inhomogeneous Schottky barriers diodes,” IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, March 19-23,
on silicon carbide,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 97, issue 12, 15 2006, Dallas, Texas, pp. 448-454.
June 2005.

204

Authorized licensed use limited to: NXP Semiconductors. Downloaded on December 19,2020 at 14:11:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

You might also like