Professional Documents
Culture Documents
F3-25 IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
F3-25 IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
F3-25 IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
IAS 37 Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities
and Contingent Assets
FOCUS
This session covers the following content from the ACCA Study Guide.
Session 25 Guidance
Understand the basics of this very important IFRS. The implications of its requirements are far
reaching and in later papers you will need to deal with its more detailed requirements.
Learn the terminology in section 1. In particular, a provision must be a liability.
Understand the recognition criteria (s.2.1) and that an item meeting the criteria must be recognised
as a liability (s.2.2).
IAS 37
• Scope
• Terminology
PROVISIONS CONTINGENCIES
• Recognition Criteria • Nature
• Accounting Treatment • Uncertainty
• Measurement • Contingent Liabilities
• Contingent Assets
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT
• Summary
• Disclosures
Session 25 Guidance
Read the guidance on measurement (s.2.3) and appreciate its application to a single obligation
(Illustrations 2 and 3) or multiple obligations (Illustrations 4 and 5). Do Example 1.
Appreciate that a contingency is not necessarily uncertain (s.3.1). Do Example 2 as a review of
your understanding.
Read through the remainder of the session and understand the summary points.
1 IAS 37
1.1 Scope
IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
applies to all entities and details the accounting for provisions,
contingent liabilities and contingent assets excluding those
covered by other Standards.
For example, IAS 37 excludes provisions arising from:
construction contracts;
income taxes;
leases; and The more specific
employee benefits. IFRSs covering these
topics are all outside
1.2 Terminology the scope of the FFA/
F3 syllabus.
Provisions: liabilities of uncertain timing or amount.
Liability: a present obligation arising from past events, the
settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow of
resources embodying economic benefits.
Contingent liability: either a
possible obligation arising from past events whose existence
will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence
of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the
control of the entity; or*
*A possible obligation
present obligation arising from past events (an obligating cannot be provided as
event) which is not recognised because: a contingent liability
(i) an outflow of resources is not probable; or until it becomes
probable (i.e. when it
(ii) it cannot be measured with sufficient reliability.*
meets the definition of
Contingent asset: a possible asset arising from past events a liability).
whose existence will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non- *That is, it does not
occurrence of one or more uncertain future events. meet the recognition
criteria for a provision
in that again it is
not probable or it
cannot be measured.
(Elements of financial
statements must be
measurable.)
2 Provisions
*The debit (Dr) entry sometimes may be included in the initial cost
of a non-current asset (e.g. a decommissioning cost, in accordance
Provisions must be
with IAS 16) rather than as an expense. The credit (Cr) entry,
recognised in the
however, always will be a liability in the statement of financial
financial statements.
position.
2.3 Measurement
This should be a best estimate. For example, a best estimate
might be:
evidenced by events after the end of the reporting period
(see Session 26);
an expected value (i.e. weighting all possible outcomes
by their probabilities) which can be used to estimate
obligations such as warranties for products sold or other
multiple obligations;
the midpoint of a range of possible values;
the most likely outcome (for single, one-off obligations).
Illustration 1 Substantial
Legal Claims
Factors taken into account in evaluating the provision include:
In 2013, Bendick was sued for damages by a major customer for breach of contract. In
March 2014, the court ruled in favour of the customer but deferred its ruling on the amount
of damages until June. For legal advice in defence of this claim Bendick paid $15,000
in 2013; a further $20,000 to date (to be paid once the matter is settled in June); and
Bendick expects to pay an additional $10,000 before the matter is wholly settled.
Bendick's legal advisor is of the opinion that Bendick will be directed to reimburse the
customer's legal costs, which he estimates will be as much as those of Bendick. Based on
the level of damages being claimed, he also is of the opinion that these are likely to be in
the region of $250,000 to $300,000.
Analysis of best estimate
Bendick should provide for the sum of:
1. its own legal costs incurred after the end of the reporting period ($15,000 incurred in
2013 is already expensed);
2. the best estimate of the customer's legal costs;
3. the best estimate of the damages—this is the most subjective. As the estimated range
of the outcome is quite narrow, any amount in this range may be considered as good
an estimate as any other. However, as the lower end of the range may be considered
imprudent and the upper end over prudent, a midpoint may be selected.
Thus a best estimate may be:
$000
For Bendick's legal costs ($20,000 + 10,000) 30
For the customer's legal costs ($15,000 + 20,000 + 10,000) 45
For the award of damages (midpoint of range) 275
350
Illustration 4 Warranties
Provision
Amber sells goods with a warranty to cover the costs of repairing
manufacturing faults found within 12 months of purchase. The
estimated costs of repairs in 2014 for products sold in 2013 depend
on whether the faults are major or minor. If all products returned
under warranty are returned with only minor faults, the repair costs
are estimated at $100,000. However, if all returned products have
major faults, repair costs are estimated at $400,000. In Amber's
experience, 75% of goods sold have no faults, 20% have minor
faults and 5% have major faults.
Analysis of best estimate
An expected cost of repairs can be calculated as the amount to
be provided in the financial statements in respect of the warranty
claims for the year ended 31 December 2013:
(75% × $0) + (20% × $100,000) + (5% × $400,000) = $40,000*
Journal entry:
Dr
Cr
Warranty provision*
$ $
Transfer to warranty repairs 4,500 1 Jan Balance b/fwd 40,000
31 Dec Balance c/fwd 35,500
40,000 40,000
1 Jan Balance b/fwd 35,500
3 Contingencies
3.1 Nature
For a contingent asset or liability, a key issue is whether its
existence is confirmed or not confirmed.*
If confirmed, it is contingent because recognition criteria for
a provision have not (yet) been met.
If not confirmed, then it is contingent because uncertain
future events may or may not occur.
*The fact that an estimate is involved does not of itself create the
type of uncertainty which characterises a contingency.
Example 2 Contingencies
Determine which of the following uncertainties meet the criteria of a
contingency. Write "Yes" (if it does) or "No" (if it does not).
Solution
Contingency:
Uncertainty Yes or No
3.2 Uncertainty
The uncertainty of a contingency can be expressed by a range of
outcomes. The approaches range from specific to general.
Quantified probabilities (e.g. 40% chance of A and 60%
chance of B) are specific. This suggests a level of precision
which is unlikely to be supported by available information.
General descriptions, which are better supported by the
available information, use terms ranging from probable to
remote.
4 Accounting Treatment
4.1 Summary
4.2 Disclosures
4.2.1 Provisions
For each class of provision, the following must be disclosed:
A reconciliation of carrying amounts (including increases,
utilisation and reversals).
A brief description of the obligation.
An indication of uncertainties about the amount or timing of
outflows.
Expected reimbursement (if any).
Exhibit 1 RECONCILIATION OF
CARRYING AMOUNTS
The following extract is from the notes to SKF's 2011 Annual Report.
Environmental provisions and provisions for claims cover obligations not settled at year-
end. Long-term employee benefits primarily include jubilee bonuses and part-time retirement
programmes which are provided to employees in certain countries and are expected to be
settled before employment ends. The increase in long-tern employee benefits for 2011 refers
mainly to the Jubilee provisions in Italy. Other provisions primarily include litigation, insurance
and anti-dumping duties.
4.2.2 Contingencies
The following disclosures are required for contingencies:
Nature of the contingent liability/asset.
Estimate of financial effect (where practicable).
Uncertainties affecting amount or timing.
Session 25 Quiz
Estimated time: 15 minutes
EXAMPLE SOLUTIONS
Solution 2—Contingencies
Contingency:
Uncertainty Yes or No
(a) Litigation pending is contingent on the court's decision. Yes
(b) Estimating useful lives of asset is not a contingency. Estimation No
used to determine depreciation does not make depreciation a
contingency. Eventual expiry of useful life is not an uncertain
event.
(c) Guarantee (e.g. of a bank loan): Whether the bank will call upon Yes
the guarantee to obtain reimbursement of the loan is an unknown
future event; therefore, it is a contingency.
(d) Recoverability of a liquidated debt: The fact that the amount of a No
provision against the recorded trade receivable has to be estimated
does not result in a contingency. There is nothing uncertain about
the fact that the customer has gone into liquidation.
(e) Options (e.g. to sell or purchase shares): An option is a right that Yes
is exercised at the behest of the person who paid for the option.
Whether the option will be exercised is not known with certainty
therefore it is a contingency.
(f) Estimates of amounts owed for services received are not No
contingencies. These obligations have been incurred.
(g) Net realisable value of slow-moving inventories: That a provision No
needs to be estimated does not create a contingency. The
inventory is slow moving. The exercise of prudence will be a
consideration in determining an appropriate accounting estimate.