Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sample Pleadings For Law Written by Me
Sample Pleadings For Law Written by Me
SCHOOL OF LAW
SAMPLE PLEADINGS
COMPLAINT-AFFIDAVIT
I, Anna Fritz, Filipino, Female, of legal age, and a resident of Naga City,
Philippines, after being sworn to in accordance with law, depose and state:
1. That Juan Dela Cruz, at the time of the crime, once resided in Naga State
Asylum and was suffering from psychosis due to drug abuse;
2. That he was once a suitor of mine before his time at the asylum;
3. That three days before the commission of the crime, Juan Dela Cruz was
dismissed from the asylum due to having been healed of his psychosis, herein
records of the dismissal attached as “Annex A”;
4. That in the morning of April 1, Juan Dela Cruz stole my bag while I was
walking at the local park without a proper reason;
6. That testimonials from various eyewitnesses and a report from the local police
authority confirmed that on such dates such incident occurred, herein attached as
“Annex B”;
7. That Dr. John Doe, the head doctor at Saint Nick Hospital, described such
physical abuse to be serious physical injury that could have resulted to my death if
it wasn’t treated early. A medical certificate was issued by said hospital signed by
the shift doctor, hereby attached as “Annex C”;
8. That a Complaint was filed under RTC Branch 41 on April 11, 2019 for crime
against Art 310 of RPC or Qualified theft, filed Complaint attached “Annex D”;
CERTIFICATION
GAY BOWSER
Assistant City Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines )
Naga City ) s.s.
COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT
I, JUAN DELA CRUZ, Filipino, Male, of legal age, and a resident of Naga
City, Philippines, after being sworn to in accordance with law, depose and state:
1. I was charged with Serious Qualified theft under Art 310 of R.P.C. and of R.A.
9262 Violation of Violence against women and children attached “Annex A”;
3. I deny such allegations of the petitioner that I urged her to do sexual intercourse
with me as stated in the complaint-affidavit;
4. That the police officer arrested me at the same spot where I assaulted her while
not being under a lucid state;
5. That upon careful examination by Dr. Joe mama after the incident, assistant
doctor of St. Nick Hospital, It was confirmed that before the act was done I under a
lucid interval, herein attached a statement of the Doctor being “Annex B”;
6. That I should be exempted of any criminal liability as I did not act during a lucid
interval upon the commission of the crime under Par. 1 of Art. 12;
7. That there is no need for any protection or restraining order to be issued because
I do not intend to hurt or cause in harm to the petitioner in whatever form;
CERTIFICATION
Doc. No.
Page No.
Book No.
Series of 2020.
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of the City Prosecutor
Naga City
Anna Fritz,
Complainant,
REPLY
2. That the argument raised by the respondent in the counter affidavit is that his
actions are not criminal in nature but due to insanity;
3. That there can be no conclusion other than the fact that the respondent willfully,
unlawfully, feloniously committed serious physical injuries against the petitioner;
4. That the rest of the allegations in respondents’ counter affidavit are unreliable
and are designed to release the accused from any criminal liability;
5. That the allegations of the accused that he had his sanity lost during the assault
was unconfirmed as there were no statement from any proper authority to validate
during the that time of the commission of the crime, he was not acting during a
lucid interval;
WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is hereby prayed that the
corresponding information for a violation of R.A. 9262 and R.A. 120 be promptly
filed with the proper court.
ANNA FRITZ
Complainant
Doc. No.
Page No.
Book No.
Series of 2020.
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of the City Prosecutor
Naga City
Anna Fritz,
Complainant,
REJOINDER
COMES NOW, Pedro Santos, unto the Honorable Prosecutor, and by way
of a Rejoinder, most respectfully aver that:
1. This Rejoinder is being filed with the Office of the City Prosecutor considering
that Reply filed by the complainant disregards the fact that the acts committed by
respondent are psychotic in nature;
2. Such points to no other conclusion that what transpired is a purely psychotic and
respondent is not criminally liable;
3. There appears neither a valid nor a cogent reason to proceed with the filing of
the information as there is a lack of merit on the case of the complainant.
Doc. No.
Page No.
Book No.
Series of 2020.
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of the City Prosecutor
Naga City
Anna Fritz,
Complainant,
SUR-REJOINDER
COMES NOW the complainant, Anna Fritz, through counsel, unto the
Honorable Prosecutor, and by way of a Sur rejoinder, respectfully aver and state
that:
1. This Sur rejoinder is being filed with the Office of the City Prosecutor
considering that Rejoinder filed by the respondent disregards the fact that his
actions are criminal in nature and not in any way defensive in nature.
Copy furnished:
Anna Fritz,
Complainant,
Accused Pedro Santos, through the undersigned counsel and unto the
Honorable Prosecutor, most respectfully avers:
2. That the Complaint-Affidavit contains matters that are vague and may
jeopardize the Constitutional rights of the accused.
Dear Sir,
Greetings!
Please take notice that on Friday, August 12, 2020, at the Regional Trial
Court Branch 41 at 12 o’clock p.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard,
the undersigned will submit the foregoing motion for the approval of the court.
Anna Fritz,
Complainant,
RESOLUTION
In his statement, the complainant alleges that, during said time and place, the
respondent, motivated by malice against the said complainant by means of stealing
her belongings, then forcibly grabbing her and kicking her at the back, and then
dragging her to a dark alleyway to and was nearly able to commit illegal sexual
intercourse with her without any means from the complainant to defend herself
However, the respondents claim that, the filing of the complaint does not
carry any criminal liability since the act was performed during a psychotic episode
under Par. 1 of Art. 12.
Approved:
Sans Heil
City Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of the City Prosecutor
Naga City
Anna Fritz,
Complainant,
That on April 1 2019, in Naga City, Philippines, and within the jurisdiction
of this Honorable Court, the said accused willfully, unlawfully and feloniously
stole the complainant’s personal belongings all the while physically assaulting her,
and dragging her to a dark alleyway where he almost sexually assaulted her, only
to be stopped and apprehended by local authorities.
Contrary to law.
Naga City,
Philippines
BAIL RECOMMENDED: P 70,000.00.